EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007FA0139
Case F-139/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 — Van Arum v Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal — Staff Report — Scope of the complaint referred to in Article 90 of the Staff Regulations)
Case F-139/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 — Van Arum v Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal — Staff Report — Scope of the complaint referred to in Article 90 of the Staff Regulations)
Case F-139/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 — Van Arum v Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal — Staff Report — Scope of the complaint referred to in Article 90 of the Staff Regulations)
IO C 267, 7.11.2009, p. 83–83
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
7.11.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 267/83 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 — Van Arum v Parliament
(Case F-139/07) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Appraisal - Staff Report - Scope of the complaint referred to in Article 90 of the Staff Regulations)
2009/C 267/149
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Rinse van Arum (Winksele, Belgium) (represented by: W. van den Muijsenbergh, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J.F. De Wachter, C. Burgos and K. Zejdová)
Re:
Staff case — Application to alter, or, alternatively, to annul the Staff Report, and to order the defendant to pay the token sum of EUR 1 as damages.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 92, 12.4.2009, p. 49.