This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007CA0466
Case C-466/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany)) — Dietmar Klarenberg v Ferrotron Technologies GmbH (Social policy — Directive 2001/23/EC — Transfer of undertakings — Safeguarding of employees' rights — Concept of legal transfer — Legal transfer of a part of a business to another undertaking — Organisational autonomy following the transfer)
Case C-466/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany)) — Dietmar Klarenberg v Ferrotron Technologies GmbH (Social policy — Directive 2001/23/EC — Transfer of undertakings — Safeguarding of employees' rights — Concept of legal transfer — Legal transfer of a part of a business to another undertaking — Organisational autonomy following the transfer)
Case C-466/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany)) — Dietmar Klarenberg v Ferrotron Technologies GmbH (Social policy — Directive 2001/23/EC — Transfer of undertakings — Safeguarding of employees' rights — Concept of legal transfer — Legal transfer of a part of a business to another undertaking — Organisational autonomy following the transfer)
IO C 82, 4.4.2009, p. 5–5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
4.4.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 82/5 |
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany)) — Dietmar Klarenberg v Ferrotron Technologies GmbH
(Case C-466/07) (1)
(Social policy - Directive 2001/23/EC - Transfer of undertakings - Safeguarding of employees' rights - Concept of legal transfer - Legal transfer of a part of a business to another undertaking - Organisational autonomy following the transfer)
(2009/C 82/08)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Dietmar Klarenberg
Defendant: Ferrotron Technologies GmbH
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf — Interpretation of Article 1(1)(a) and (b) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses (OJ 2001 L 82, p. 16) — Applicability of Directive 2001/23/EC in the event of a legal transfer of a part of a business to another undertaking which integrates, into its organisational structure, the part of the business that has been transferred without preserving the latter's organisational autonomy — Concept of ‘transfer’ for the purposes of Directive 2001/23/EC
Operative part of the judgment
Article 1(1)(a) and (b) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses must be interpreted as meaning that that directive may also apply in a situation where the part of the undertaking or business transferred does not retain its organisational autonomy, provided that the functional link between the various elements of production transferred is preserved, and that that link enables the transferee to use those elements to pursue an identical or analogous economic activity, a matter which it is for the national court to determine.