This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62005FA0104
Case F-104/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2008 — Valero Jordana v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2004 promotion exercise — Award of priority points — Temporal application of provisions of the new Staff Regulations)
Case F-104/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2008 — Valero Jordana v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2004 promotion exercise — Award of priority points — Temporal application of provisions of the new Staff Regulations)
Case F-104/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2008 — Valero Jordana v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2004 promotion exercise — Award of priority points — Temporal application of provisions of the new Staff Regulations)
IO C 116, 9.5.2008, p. 31–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
9.5.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 116/31 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2008 — Valero Jordana v Commission
(Case F-104/05) (1)
(Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - 2004 promotion exercise - Award of priority points - Temporal application of provisions of the new Staff Regulations)
(2008/C 116/58)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Gregorio Valero Jordana (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Merola and I. van Schendel, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and V. Joris, Agents, assisted by D. Slater, lawyer)
Re:
Annulment of the Commission's decision awarding priority points to the applicant under the 2004 promotion exercise and of the decision not to promote him to Grade A*12 under that exercise
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1. |
Annuls the decision setting Mr Valero Jordana's total number of points at the end of the 2004 promotion exercise and the decision not to promote him under that exercise; |
2. |
Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
3. |
Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear all the costs. |
(1) OJ C 10, 14.1.2006, p. 27 (Case initially registered at the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under T-394/05 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15 December 2005).