This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023TJ0194
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.
Fractal Analytics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark FRACTALIA – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1) and (2) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Nature of use – Assessment of the evidence – Comparison between the subcategories of services used and the specification of the services covered by the trade mark.
Case T-194/23.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.
Fractal Analytics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark FRACTALIA – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1) and (2) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Nature of use – Assessment of the evidence – Comparison between the subcategories of services used and the specification of the services covered by the trade mark.
Case T-194/23.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:696
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2024 –
Fractal Analytics v EUIPO – Fractalia Remote Systems (FRACTALIA)
(Case T‑194/23) ( 1 )
(EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark FRACTALIA – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1) and (2) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Nature of use – Assessment of the evidence – Comparison between the subcategories of services used and the specification of the services covered by the trade mark)
|
1. |
EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Revocation proceedings – Facts and evidence not submitted within the prescribed time limit – Account taken – Discretion of the Board of Appeal (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 95(2); Commission Regulation 2018/625, Art. 27(4)) (see paragraphs 36, 41, 42, 48) |
|
2. |
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Grounds for revocation – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Proof of use – Genuine use – Concept – Criteria for assessment – Requirement of solid and objective evidence (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 18(1) and 58(1)(a); Commission Regulation 2018/625, Art. 10(3)) (see paragraphs 66-69, 127, 128) |
|
3. |
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Grounds for revocation – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Proof of use – Genuine use – Use during a five year period – Consideration of evidence concerning use outside of that period – Conditions (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 18(1) and 58(1)(a)) (see paragraph 76) |
|
4. |
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Grounds for revocation – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Figurative mark FRACTALIA (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 18(1) and 58(1)(a)) (see paragraphs 77, 86, 96, 107, 116, 123, 140, 167) |
|
5. |
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Grounds for revocation – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Proof of use – Genuine use – Concept – Criteria for assessment – Territorial extent of the use (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 18(1) and 58(1)(a)) (see paragraphs 82-84) |
|
6. |
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Grounds for revocation – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Proof of use – Genuine use – Concept – Criteria for assessment – Company name, commercial name or trade name (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 18(1) and 58(1)(a)) (see paragraph 101) |
|
7. |
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Grounds for revocation – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Use by a third party with the consent of the trade mark proprietor (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 18(2)) (see paragraphs 102, 103) |
|
8. |
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Grounds for revocation – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Use of the mark in a form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Purpose and scope of Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of alteration of distinctive character (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 18(1)(a) and 58(1)(a)) (see paragraphs 113, 114) |
|
9. |
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Grounds for revocation – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Proof of use – Partial use – Effect – Concept of ‘part of the goods or services’ covered by the registration (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 18(1) and 58(1)(a)) (see paragraphs 119-122, 147, 154-156) |
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Fractal Analytics, Inc. to pay the costs incurred by Fractalia Remote Systems, SL and to bear its own costs; |
|
3. |
Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 189, 30.5.2023.