Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020CO0088

    Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 May 2021.
    Criminal proceedings against ENR Grenelle Habitat SARL and Others.
    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Fundamental rights – Ne bis in idem principle – Joint imposition of administrative and criminal penalties for identical facts – Cold calling – Misleading commercial practice – Insufficient justification for a reference for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.
    Case C-88/20.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:407

     Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 May 2021 – ENR Grenelle Habitat and Others

    (Case C‑88/20) ( 1 )

    (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Fundamental rights – Ne bis in idem principle – Joint imposition of administrative and criminal penalties for identical facts – Cold calling – Misleading commercial practice – Insufficient justification for a reference for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility)

    Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the factual and legislative context and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Questions submitted in a context which precludes a useful answer – Manifest inadmissibility

    (Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94)

    (see paras 28-37, 39, operative part)

    Operative part

    The request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the tribunal correctionnel de Bordeaux (Criminal Court, Bordeaux, France), by decision of 12 December 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.

    Top