Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017CJ0172

    Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 September 2018.
    ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias v European Commission.
    Appeal — Arbitration clauses — Pocemon Agreement concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration 2007-2013 — Eligible costs — European Commission decision — Obligation to reimburse sums paid — Counter-claim.
    Case C-172/17 P.

    Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 September 2018 — ANKO v Commission

    (Case C‑172/17 P) ( 1 )

    (Appeal — Arbitration clauses — Pocemon Agreement concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration 2007-2013 — Eligible costs — European Commission decision — Obligation to reimburse sums paid — Counter-claim)

    1. 

    Appeal — Grounds — Mistaken assessment of the facts — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of Justice of the assessment of the facts put before the General Court — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted — Plea alleging distortion of the facts — Need to indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted and show the errors of appraisal which led to that distortion

    (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)

    (see paras 23, 24, 32)

    2. 

    Appeal — Grounds — Inadequate statement of reasons — Reliance by the General Court on implied reasoning — Lawfulness — Conditions

    (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 36 and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 117)

    (see para. 33)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2. 

    Orders ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias to pay the costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 168, 29.5.2017.

    Top