EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FA0064
Case F-64/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 June 2011 — Mantzouratos v European Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — Promotion period 2009 — Decision not to promote — Admissibility of plea of illegality — Comparative examination of merits — Manifest error of assessment)
Case F-64/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 June 2011 — Mantzouratos v European Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — Promotion period 2009 — Decision not to promote — Admissibility of plea of illegality — Comparative examination of merits — Manifest error of assessment)
Case F-64/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 June 2011 — Mantzouratos v European Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — Promotion period 2009 — Decision not to promote — Admissibility of plea of illegality — Comparative examination of merits — Manifest error of assessment)
OJ C 232, 6.8.2011, p. 40–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 07/06/2011
- Date lodged:
- 03/08/2010
- Author:
- An Binse um Sheirbhís Shibhialta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Fraincis
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
6.8.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 232/40 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 June 2011 — Mantzouratos v European Parliament
(Case F-64/10) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Promotion - Promotion period 2009 - Decision not to promote - Admissibility of plea of illegality - Comparative examination of merits - Manifest error of assessment)
(2011/C 232/71)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Andreas Mantzouratos (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by V. Montebello-Demongeot and K. Zejdová, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the European Parliament’s decision not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 13 in the promotion period 2009 and also of the decisions to promote to that grade officials having fewer promotion points than the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
