EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009TJ0344
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2012. # Hearst Communications, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark COSMOBELLEZA - Earlier national and international word and figurative marks COSMO, COSMOPOLITAN, COSMOTEST, COSMOPOLITAN TELEVISION and THE COSMOPOLITAN SHOW - Non-registered marks and trade names COSMO and COSMOPOLITAN - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the marks - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. # Case T-344/09.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2012.
Hearst Communications, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark COSMOBELLEZA - Earlier national and international word and figurative marks COSMO, COSMOPOLITAN, COSMOTEST, COSMOPOLITAN TELEVISION and THE COSMOPOLITAN SHOW - Non-registered marks and trade names COSMO and COSMOPOLITAN - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the marks - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-344/09.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2012.
Hearst Communications, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark COSMOBELLEZA - Earlier national and international word and figurative marks COSMO, COSMOPOLITAN, COSMOTEST, COSMOPOLITAN TELEVISION and THE COSMOPOLITAN SHOW - Non-registered marks and trade names COSMO and COSMOPOLITAN - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the marks - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-344/09.
European Court Reports 2012 -00000
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2012:324
- Date of document:
- 27/06/2012
- Date lodged:
- 31/08/2009
- Author:
- Cúirt Ghinearálta
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Tríú tíortha
- Form:
- Breithiúnas
- Authentic language:
- Béarla
- Type of procedure:
- Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú - gan bhunús
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Schwarcz
- Treaty:
- An Conradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 32009R0207-A08P1LB: N 21 - 105
- 32009R0207-A08P2: N 27
- 32009R0207-A08P5: N 96
- 32009R0207-A08P2LC: N 97
- 61995CJ0251: N 95
- 61997CJ0039: N 94 95
- 61997CJ0342: N 95
- 62001TJ0162: N 22 40
- 62001TJ0292: N 58
- 62002TJ0286: N 41
- 62002TJ0359: N 44
- 62003TJ0081: N 24 94
- 62003TJ0169: N 27
- 62003TJ0194: N 85 - 87
- 62004TJ0007: N 43
- 62004TJ0034: N 76
- 62004TJ0256: N 28
- 62004TJ0277: N 96
- 62004TJ0353: N 63
- 62005CJ0334: N 42
- 62005TJ0158: N 52
- 62006CJ0234: N 85
- 62006TJ0099: N 35
- 62006TJ0112: N 100 101
- 62006TJ0287: N 87
- 62007TJ0316: N 23 100
- 62009TJ0369: N 52
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
-
4.11.03.02.07.02.01 Beartas inmheánach an Aontais Eorpaigh / Dlíthe a chomhfhogasú / Trádmharc Comhphobail / Forais choibhneasta le diúltú / / /
-
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2012 —
Hearst Communications v OHIM — Vida Estética (COSMOBELLEZA)
(Case T-344/09)
Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark COSMOBELLEZA — Earlier national and international word and figurative marks COSMO, COSMOPOLITAN, COSMOTEST, COSMOPOLITAN TELEVISION and THE COSMOPOLITAN SHOW — Non-registered marks and trade names COSMO and COSMOPOLITAN — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the marks — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009
Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 36, 98-104)
Re:
| ACTION against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 June 2009 (Case R 770/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Hearst Communications, Inc. and Vida Estética, SL. |
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Hearst Communications, Inc. to pay the costs. |
