(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1028/2006 lays down the basic requirements which eggs must satisfy to be marketed in the Community. For the sake of clarity, new detailed rules for the implementation of those requirements should be laid down. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2295/2003 of 23 December 2003 introducing detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 on certain marketing standards for eggs (2) should therefore be repealed and replaced by a new Regulation.

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs (3) and Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin (4) apply to eggs. Therefore, reference should be made to the extent possible to those horizontal Regulations.

(3)

The quality characteristics for Class A eggs should be fixed in order to guarantee the high quality of eggs to be delivered directly to the final consumer and to set criteria that can be checked by inspection services. Such quality characteristics should be based on Standard No 42 of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) concerning the marketing and commercial quality controls of eggs-in-shell moving in international trade between and to UN/ECE member countries.

(4)

Cold eggs left out at room temperature can lead to condensation, facilitating the growth of bacteria on the shell and probably ingress into the egg. Therefore, eggs must be stored and transported preferably at a constant temperature, and should in general not be refrigerated before sale to the final consumer.

(5)

In general, eggs should not be washed or cleaned because such practices can cause damage to the egg shell, which is an effective barrier to bacterial ingress with an array of antimicrobial properties for the egg. However, some practices, such as treatment of eggs with ultra-violet rays, should not be interpreted as constituting a cleaning process. Moreover, Class A eggs should not be washed because of the potential damage to the physical barriers, such as the cuticle, which can occur during or after washing. Such damage may favour trans-shell contamination with bacteria and moisture loss and thereby increase the risk to consumers, particularly if subsequent drying and storage conditions are not optimal.

(6)

However, egg-washing systems subject to authorisation and operating under carefully controlled conditions are used in some Member States with good results. According to the opinion of the European Food Safety Authority, Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards on the request from the Commission related to the Microbiological risks on washing of Table Eggs adopted on 7 September 2005 (5), the egg-washing practice as performed in certain packing centres can be sustained from a hygienic standpoint provided, inter alia, that a code of practice for egg-washing systems is developed.

(7)

Class A eggs should be graded by weight, and a limited number of weight grades and corresponding clear terms should be fixed as minimum labelling requirements, which do not rule out additional voluntary labelling, provided the requirements of Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs (6) are met.

(8)

Only undertakings whose premises and technical equipment are suited to the scale and type of their operations, and which therefore allow eggs to be handled properly, should be authorised to grade eggs by quality and weight as packing centres.

(9)

Maximum time limits for the grading, marking, packing of eggs and marking of packs should be fixed in order to facilitate checks as provided for in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1028/2006.

(10)

In addition to the general obligation to establish traceability of food, feed, food-producing animals, and any other substance intended to be, or expected to be, incorporated into food or feed at all stages of production, processing and distribution in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (7), certain information on transport packaging containing eggs and accompanying documents for the purpose of carrying out checks should be laid down.

(11)

For the purpose of performing checks effectively as provided for in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1028/2006, the marking of eggs with the producer code at the production site is essential where eggs are delivered to another Member State. In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1028/2006, Class B eggs are to be marked with the producer code and/or with another indication if marketed in another Member State. It should be clarified that in case the producer code alone does not allow for a clear distinction of the quality grading, Class B eggs should be marked with another indication.

(12)

The composition of the producer code provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1028/2006 should be fixed. Moreover, it should be clarified that an exception to the marking requirement with the producer code may be made if the technical equipment for egg marking does not allow for marking cracked or soiled eggs.

(13)

The characteristics of the other possible indications for marking Class B eggs as referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1028/2006 should be defined.

(14)

Under Article 2(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 of 26 June 1990 on certain marketing standards for eggs (8), provisions on marking did not apply to eggs delivered directly to the food industry for processing. In order to improve controls on such deliveries, Member States should grant exemptions from the marking requirement only on request of such operators. However, in order to allow Member States to grant such exemptions, a reasonable transitional period of one year should be laid down.

(15)

Directive 2000/13/EC lays down rules of a general nature applicable to all foodstuffs put on the market. However, some specific marking requirements should be provided for packs.

(16)

Article 9 of Directive 2000/13/EC defines the date of minimum durability of a foodstuff to be the date until which the foodstuff retains its specific properties when properly stored. For the sake of clarity, this date should be fixed at not more than 28 days after laying.

(17)

Eggs may be sold with an indication highlighting the particular freshness of the egg. For this purpose, a maximum time limit should be fixed clarifying the use of such indications.

(18)

Eggs may be sold with an indication highlighting the particular feed formula fed to the laying hens. It is appropriate to fix minimum requirements for such indications.

(19)

When eggs are sold loose, certain information normally on the pack should be accessible to the consumer.

(20)

In addition to the general hygiene requirements for the wrapping and packaging of foodstuffs, some additional requirements should be laid down in order to minimise the risk of deterioration or contamination of eggs during storage and transport. Such standards should be based on UN/ECE Standard No 42.

(21)

Industrial eggs are unfit for human consumption. It is therefore appropriate to require special bands or labels for the easy identification of packaging containing such eggs.

(22)

Only packing centres have the premises and technical equipment suitable for repacking eggs. It is therefore appropriate to limit any repacking activities to packing centres.

(23)

Food business operators are obliged to establish traceability in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 178/2002. Producers, collectors and packing centres should be obliged to keep specific additional records in order to allow inspection services to check compliance with the marketing standards.

(24)

The methods and criteria for conducting checks should be laid down.

(25)

It is appropriate to check compliance with the marketing standards for a batch as a whole, and the marketing of a batch found not to be compliant should be prohibited unless compliance can be proven.

(26)

Certain tolerances should be allowed when checking compliance with the marketing standards. Such tolerances should differ according to the different requirements and marketing stages.

(27)

Third countries may have requirements different from those fixed for the Community for the marketing of eggs. In order to facilitate exports, eggs packed and intended for export should be allowed to conform to such requirements.

(28)

Details should be fixed regarding the assessment of the equivalence of third country marketing standards with Community legislation to be conducted by the Commission at the request of third countries. Certain marking and labelling requirements for eggs imported from third countries should be laid down.

(29)

It is useful for the Commission to have data available on the number of laying hen places registered.

(30)

Member States should communicate significant infringements of the marketing standards so that other Member States that may be affected can be alerted in an appropriate manner.

(31)

Egg supply for the retail trade in the French overseas departments relies partly on the supply of eggs from the European continent. In view of the duration of transport and of climatic conditions, the preservation of eggs transported to the French overseas departments presupposes the fulfilment of specific supply arrangements, including the possibility to dispatch eggs chilled. These special arrangements can be justified by the current lack of sufficient local egg production capacities. Until sufficient local production capacities are built up, these exceptional arrangements should be prolonged for a reasonable period of time.

(32)

Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1028/2006 allows Member States to exempt certain forms of direct sales of eggs from producers to the final consumer from the requirements of that Regulation. In order to take account of the specific conditions of egg marketing in certain regions in Finland, sales from producers to retail outlets in those regions should be exempted from the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1028/2006 and of this Regulation.

(33)

Member States should ensure that rearing of laying hens in unenriched cage systems is prohibited with effect from 1 January 2012 in accordance with Article 5(2) of Council Directive 1999/74/EC (9). The Commission should therefore evaluate the application of the voluntary labelling provisions foreseen with regard to enriched cages before that date in order to examine the need of rendering this labelling compulsory.

(34)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Poultrymeat and Eggs,

(a)

‘pack’ means a wrapping containing Class A or B eggs, excluding transport packaging and containers of industrial eggs;

(b)

‘loose sales’ means the offer for retail sale of eggs to the final consumer, other than in packs;

(c)

‘collector’ means any establishment registered in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 to collect eggs from a producer for delivery to a packing centre, to a market selling exclusively to wholesalers whose undertakings are approved as packing centres, or to food and non-food industry;

(d)

‘sell-by date’ means the maximum time limit for delivery of the egg to the final consumer according to point 3 of Chapter I of Section X of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004;

(e)

‘food industry’ means any establishment producing egg products intended for human consumption, excluding mass caterers;

(f)

‘non-food industry’ means any business producing products containing eggs not intended for human consumption;

(g)

‘mass caterers’ means the entities referred to in Article 1(2) of Directive 2000/13/EC;

(h)

‘industrial eggs’ means eggs not intended for human consumption;

(i)

‘batch’ means the eggs in packs or loose from one and the same production site or packing centre, situated in one place, in the same packs or loose, with one and the same laying date or date of minimum durability or packing date, the same farming method, and in the case of graded eggs, the same quality and weight grading;

(j)

‘repacking’ means the physical transfer of eggs to another pack or the re-marking of a pack containing eggs.

(a)

reference may be made to cereals as a feed ingredient only where they account for at least 60 % in weight of the feed formula given, of which no more than 15 % of cereal by-products may be part;

(b)

without prejudice to the minimum of 60 % referred to in point (a), where reference is made to a specific cereal, it shall account for at least 30 % of the feed formula used. If specific reference is made to more than one cereal, each shall account for at least 5 % of the feed formula.

(a)

the quality gradings;

(b)

the weight grading in accordance with Article 4;

(c)

an indication of the farming method equivalent to that referred to in Article 12(2);

(d)

an explanation of the meaning of the producer code;

(e)

the date of minimum durability.

(a)

the name and address of the operator for whom the eggs are intended;

(b)

the name and address of the operator who has dispatched the eggs;

(c)

the words ‘industrial eggs’ in capital letters 2 cm high, and the words ‘unsuitable for human consumption’ in letters at least 8 mm high.