This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2004/085/04
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 February 2004 in Case C-95/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de grande instance de Paris): John Greenham v Léonard Abel (Free movement of goods — Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — Prohibition on marketing foodstuffs to which vitamins and minerals have been added — Justification — Proportionality)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 February 2004 in Case C-95/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de grande instance de Paris): John Greenham v Léonard Abel (Free movement of goods — Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — Prohibition on marketing foodstuffs to which vitamins and minerals have been added — Justification — Proportionality)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 February 2004 in Case C-95/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de grande instance de Paris): John Greenham v Léonard Abel (Free movement of goods — Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — Prohibition on marketing foodstuffs to which vitamins and minerals have been added — Justification — Proportionality)
IO C 85, 3.4.2004, p. 4–4
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)