This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TO0031
Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 March 2020.#AF v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Action for annulment and damages — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Duties as an administrator as a policy adviser in grade AD 12 — Assignment to the type of post ‘administrator’ — 2014 Staff Regulations — No eligibility for reclassification in the grade above — 2017 reclassification exercise — Refusal to consider the applicant for the purposes of his reclassification in grade AD 13 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-31/19.
Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 March 2020.
AF v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.
Action for annulment and damages — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Duties as an administrator as a policy adviser in grade AD 12 — Assignment to the type of post ‘administrator’ — 2014 Staff Regulations — No eligibility for reclassification in the grade above — 2017 reclassification exercise — Refusal to consider the applicant for the purposes of his reclassification in grade AD 13 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-31/19.
Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 March 2020.
AF v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.
Action for annulment and damages — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Duties as an administrator as a policy adviser in grade AD 12 — Assignment to the type of post ‘administrator’ — 2014 Staff Regulations — No eligibility for reclassification in the grade above — 2017 reclassification exercise — Refusal to consider the applicant for the purposes of his reclassification in grade AD 13 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-31/19.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:133