Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TN0893

    Case T-893/16: Action brought on 19 December 2016 — Xiaomi v EUIPO — Apple (MI PAD)

    IO C 46, 13.2.2017, p. 26–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    13.2.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 46/26


    Action brought on 19 December 2016 — Xiaomi v EUIPO — Apple (MI PAD)

    (Case T-893/16)

    (2017/C 046/29)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Xiaomi, Inc. (Beijing, China) (represented by: T. Raab and C. Tenkhoff, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

    Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MI PAD’ — Application for registration No 12 780 987

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 in Case R 363/2016-1

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the contested decision;

    order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

    Plea in law

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.


    Top