This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0893
Case T-893/16: Action brought on 19 December 2016 — Xiaomi v EUIPO — Apple (MI PAD)
Case T-893/16: Action brought on 19 December 2016 — Xiaomi v EUIPO — Apple (MI PAD)
Case T-893/16: Action brought on 19 December 2016 — Xiaomi v EUIPO — Apple (MI PAD)
IO C 46, 13.2.2017, p. 26–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
13.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 46/26 |
Action brought on 19 December 2016 — Xiaomi v EUIPO — Apple (MI PAD)
(Case T-893/16)
(2017/C 046/29)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Xiaomi, Inc. (Beijing, China) (represented by: T. Raab and C. Tenkhoff, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MI PAD’ — Application for registration No 12 780 987
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 in Case R 363/2016-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the contested decision; |
— |
order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Plea in law
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |