This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TA0318
Case T-318/13: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2015 — Vita Phone v OHIM — (LIFEDATA) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark LIFEDATA — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Lack of specific assessment — Duty to state reasons)
Case T-318/13: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2015 — Vita Phone v OHIM — (LIFEDATA) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark LIFEDATA — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Lack of specific assessment — Duty to state reasons)
Case T-318/13: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2015 — Vita Phone v OHIM — (LIFEDATA) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark LIFEDATA — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Lack of specific assessment — Duty to state reasons)
IO C 107, 30.3.2015, p. 26–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 12/02/2015
- Date lodged:
- 13/06/2013
- Author:
- Cúirt Ghinearálta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Gearmáinis
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
30.3.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 107/26 |
Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2015 — Vita Phone v OHIM — (LIFEDATA)
(Case T-318/13) (1)
((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark LIFEDATA - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Lack of specific assessment - Duty to state reasons))
(2015/C 107/34)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Vita Phone GmbH (Mannheim, Germany) (represented by: P. Ruess and A. Doepner-Thiele, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Marten and G. Schneider, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 March 2013 (Case R 1072/2012-1) concerning an application for registration of the word mark LIFEDATA as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Vita Phone GmbH to pay the costs. |
