This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009FB0078
Case F-78/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 June 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Action for damages — Reimbursement of costs — Availability of a parallel remedy — Manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-78/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 June 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Action for damages — Reimbursement of costs — Availability of a parallel remedy — Manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-78/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 June 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Action for damages — Reimbursement of costs — Availability of a parallel remedy — Manifestly inadmissible)
IO C 234, 28.8.2010, p. 58–58
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 22/06/2010
- Author:
- An Binse um Sheirbhís Shibhialta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Iodáilis
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Annulment requested by 62010TN0366
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
28.8.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 234/58 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 June 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-78/09) (1)
(Staff cases - Officials - Action for damages - Reimbursement of costs - Availability of a parallel remedy - Manifestly inadmissible)
2010/C 234/106
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents)
Re:
First, application for annulment of the Commission’s decision rejecting the applicant’s application for reimbursement of the costs he incurred in Case T-18/04 and which the defendant was ordered to pay by judgment of 10 June 2008. Secondly, an application for damages.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
Mr Marcuccio’s action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
The parties are to bear their own costs. |
(1) OJ C 312, 19.12.2009, p. 43
