This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62003TJ0202
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 7 February 2006. # Alecansan, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative Community trade mark COMP USA - Earlier national figurative mark COMP USA - Lack of similarity of the goods and services - Rejection of the opposition - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. # Case T-202/03.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 7 February 2006.
Alecansan, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative Community trade mark COMP USA - Earlier national figurative mark COMP USA - Lack of similarity of the goods and services - Rejection of the opposition - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.
Case T-202/03.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 7 February 2006.
Alecansan, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative Community trade mark COMP USA - Earlier national figurative mark COMP USA - Lack of similarity of the goods and services - Rejection of the opposition - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.
Case T-202/03.
Thuarascálacha na Cúirte Eorpaí 2006 II-00019*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2006:44
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 7 February 2006 − Alecansan v OHIM
(Case T-202/03)
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the figurative Community trade mark COMP USA – Earlier national figurative mark COMP USA – Lack of similarity of the goods and services – Rejection of the opposition – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 49, 51)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 March 2003 (Case R 711/2002-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Alecansan, SL, and CompUSA Management Co. |
Information relating to the case:
Applicant for the Community trade mark: |
CompUSA Management Co. |
Community trade mark sought: |
Figurative mark ‘COMP USA’ – Application No 2.133.202 for goods in Classes 9 and 37 (computer hardware and software) |
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: |
Alecansan, SL |
Mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: |
English figurative mark ‘COMP USA’, for goods in Class 39 (transport) |
Decision of the Opposition Division: |
Dismissal of the opposition |
Decision of the Board of Appeal: |
Dismissal of the appeal |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay its own costs and those of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); |
3. |
Orders the intervener to pay its own costs. |