«(Annulment of Commission Decision C (2000) 485 final – Remission of import duties – Inward processing – Lack of equivalence between Community products and imported products)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(Council Regulation No 2913/92, Art. 239; Commission Regulation No 2454/93, Arts 905 and 907)
(Council Regulation No 2913/92, Art. 221(3))
(Council Regulation No 2913/92, Art. 239(1) and Art. 220)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
13 March 2003 (1)
((Action for annulment of Commission Decision C (2000) 485 final – Remission of import duties – Inward processing – Lack of equivalence between Community products and imported products))
In Case C-156/00, Kingdom of the Netherlands, represented initially by M.A. Fierstra, acting as Agent, and, subsequently, by M.A. Fierstra and J. van Bakel, acting as Agent,applicant,
v
Commission of the European Communities, represented by C. van der Hauwaert and R. Tricot, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,defendant,
APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C (2000) 485 final of 23 February 2000 determining in a particular case that an application for remission of import duties is inadmissible in a specified amount and that there is no justification for remission of import duties in a separate amount,THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),,
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing oral argument from the parties at the hearing on 16 May 2002, at which the Kingdom of the Netherlands was represented by N.A.J. Bel, acting as Agent, and the Commission by H.M.H. Speyart, acting as Agent,after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 11 July 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
hereby:
Timmermans |
Edward |
Jann |
von Bahr |
Rosas |
|
R. Grass |
M. Wathelet |
Registrar |
President of the Fifth Chamber |