’.

‘1.

Gabriel JOK RIAK MAKOL (alias: a) Gabriel Jok b) Jok Riak c) Jock Riak) Title: Lieutenant General Designation: a) Former Sudan People's Liberation Army's (SPLA) Sector One Commander; b) Chief of Defence Forces Date of Birth: 1 Jan. 1966 Place of Birth: Bor, Sudan/South Sudan Nationality: South Sudan Passport no: South Sudan number D00008623 National identification no: M6600000258472 Address: a) Unity State, South Sudan b) Wau, Western Bahr El Ghazal, South Sudan Date of UN designation: 1 Jul. 2015 Other information: Appointed as Chief of Defence Forces on 2 May 2018. Commanded SPLA Sector One, which operates primarily within Unity State, since January 2013. In his position as the SPLA Sector One commander, he has expanded or extended the conflict in South Sudan through breaches of the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement. The SPLA is a South Sudanese military entity that has engaged in actions that have extended the conflict in South Sudan, including breaches of the January 2014 Cessation of Hostilities Agreement and the May 9, 2014 Agreement to Resolve the Crisis in South Sudan, which was a re-commitment to the CoHA and has obstructed the activities of IGAD's Monitoring and Verification Mechanism. INTERPOL-UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/notice/search/un/5879060 Information from the narrative summary of reasons for listing provided by the Sanctions Committee: Gabriel Jok Riak was listed on 1 July 2015 pursuant to paragraphs 7(a), 7(f) and 8 of resolution 2206 (2015) for, “actions or policies that have the purpose or effect of expanding or extending the conflict in South Sudan or obstructing reconciliation or peace talks or processes, including breaches of the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement”; “the obstruction of the activities of international peacekeeping, diplomatic, or humanitarian missions in South Sudan, including IGAD's Monitoring and Verification Mechanism or of the delivery or distribution of, or access to, humanitarian assistance”; and as a leader “of any entity, including any South Sudanese government, opposition, militia, or other group, that has, or whose members have, engaged in any of the activities described in paragraphs 6 and 7”. Gabriel Jok Riak is the commander of the Sudan People's Liberation Army's (SPLA) Sector One, a South Sudanese military entity that has engaged in actions that have extended the conflict in South Sudan, including breaches of the January 2014 Cessation of Hostilities Agreement (CoHA) and the May 9, 2014 Agreement to Resolve the Crisis in South Sudan (May Agreement), which was a re-commitment to the CoHA. Jok Riak has commanded SPLA Sector One, which operates primarily within Unity State, since January 2013. SPLA Divisions Three, Four, and Five are subordinate to Sector One and its commander, Jok Riak. Jok Riak and SPLA Sector One and Three forces under his overall command engaged in several actions, as detailed below, that violated the January 2014 CoHA's commitments to cease all military actions aimed at opposing forces, as well as other provocative actions, freeze forces in their current locations, and refrain from activities such as movement of forces or ammunition resupply that could lead to military confrontation. SPLA forces under Jok Riak's overall command breached the CoHA agreement several times through outright hostilities. On January 10, 2014, an SPLA force under the overall command of Sector One commander Jok Riak captured Bentiu, which had previously been under Sudan People's Liberation Army in Opposition (SPLM-IO) control since December 20, 2013. SPLA Division Three ambushed and shelled SPLM-IO fighters near Leer soon after the signing of the January 2014 CoHA and in mid-April 2014 captured Mayom and killed more than 300 SPLM-IO troops. On May 4, 2014, an SPLA force led by Jok Riak again recaptured Bentiu. On state television in Juba, an SPLA spokesman said that the government army commanded by Jok Riak had captured Bentiu at four in the afternoon, adding that Division Three and a special SPLA taskforce were involved. Hours after the May Agreement was announced, SPLA Third and Fourth Division forces engaged and repelled opposition fighters who had earlier attacked SPLA positions near Bentiu and in the northern oil regions of South Sudan. Also after the signing of the May Agreement, SPLA Division Three troops recaptured Wang Kai, and the division commander, Santino Deng Wol, authorized his forces to kill anyone carrying weapons or hiding in homes, and ordered them to burn any homes containing opposition forces. In late April and May 2015, SPLA Sector One forces led by Jok Riak conducted a full-scale military offensive against opposition forces in Unity State from Lakes State. In violation of the terms of the CoHA as detailed above, Jok Riak reportedly sought to have tanks repaired and modified for use against opposition forces in early September 2014. In late October 2014, at least 7 000 SPLA troops and heavy weapons from the Third and Fifth Divisions were redeployed to reinforce Fourth Division troops bearing the brunt of an opposition attack near Bentiu. In November 2014, the SPLA brought new military equipment and weaponry, including armored personnel carriers, helicopters, artillery guns, and ammunition into Sector One's area of responsibility, likely in preparation for fighting against the opposition. In early February 2015, Jok Riak reportedly ordered armored personnel carriers to be sent to Bentiu, possibly to respond to recent ambushes by the opposition. Subsequent to the April and May 2015 offensive in Unity State, SPLA Sector One denied requests by the Intergovernmental Authority on Development Monitoring and Verification Team (IGAD-MVM) in Bentiu to investigate this violation of the CoHA; thereby denying the IGAD-MVM freedom of movement to carry out its mandate. Additionally, in April 2014, Jok Riak expanded the conflict in South Sudan by reportedly assisting in arming and mobilizing as many as 1 000 Dinka youths to supplement traditional SPLA forces.’

1.   The form to be used for the attestation referred to in Article 45(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 shall be as set out in Annex I.

2.   The form to be used for the attestation concerning an authentic instrument referred to in Articles 58(1) and 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 shall be as set out in Annex II.

3.   The form to be used for the attestation concerning a court settlement referred to in Article 60(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 shall be as set out in Annex III.

ATTESTATION

CONCERNING A DECISION IN A MATTER OF MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY REGIMES

(Article 45(3)(b) of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 implementing enhanced cooperation in thearea of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonialproperty regimes (1))

1. Member State of origin (*)

Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Germany Greece Spain France Croatia Italy Cyprus Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Austria Portugal Slovenia Finland Sweden

2. Court or competent authority issuing the attestation

2.1. Name and designation of court or authority (*):

2.2. Address

2.2.1. Street and number/PO box (*):

2.2.2. Place and postcode (*):

2.3. Telephone (*):

2.4. Fax

2.5. Email:

2.6. Other relevant information (please specify):

3. Court (2) which gave the decision (to be completed ONLY if different from the authority referred to in section 2)

3.1. Name and designation of court (*):

3.2. Address

(1) OJ L 183, 8.7.2016, p. 1.

(*) Mandatory information.

(2) In accordance with Article 3(2) of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103, the term ‘court’ includes under certain conditions, in addition to judicial authorities, other authorities and legal professionals with competence in matters of matrimonial property regimes which exercise judicial functions or act pursuant to a delegation of power by a judicial authority or act under the control of a judicial authority. The list of these other authorities and legal professionals is published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

3.2.1. Street and number/PO box (*):

3.2.2. Place and postcode (*):

3.3. Telephone (*):

3.4. Fax:

3.5. Email:

4. Decision

4.1. Date (dd/mm/yyyy) of the decision (*):

4.2. Reference number of the decision (*):

4.3. Parties to the decision

4.3.1. Party A

4.3.1.1. Surname and given name(s) (*):

4.3.1.2. Date (dd/mm/yyyy) and place of birth:

4.3.1.3. Identification number (1)

4.3.1.3.1. Identity number:

4.3.1.3.2. Social security number:

4.3.1.3.3. Other (please specify):

4.3.1.4. Address

4.3.1.4.1. Street and number/PO box:

4.3.1.4.2. Place and postcode:

4.3.1.4.3. Country

Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Germany Greece Spain France Croatia Italy Cyprus Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Austria Portugal Slovenia Finland Sweden

Other (please specify ISO-code):

4.3.1.5. Email:

4.3.1.6. Role in the proceedings (*)

(*) Mandatory information.

(1) Please indicate the most relevant number if applicable.

4.3.1.6.1. Claimant

4.3.1.6.2. Defendant

4.3.1.6.3. Other (please specify):

4.3.2. Party B

4.3.2.1. Surname and given name(s) (*):

4.3.2.2. Date (dd/mm/yyyy) and place of birth:

4.3.2.3. Identification number (1)

4.3.2.3.1. Identity number:

4.3.2.3.2. Social security number:

4.3.2.3.3. Other (please specify):

4.3.2.4. Address

4.3.2.4.1. Street and number/PO box:

4.3.2.4.2. Place and postcode:

4.3.2.4.3. Country

Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Germany Greece Spain France Croatia Italy Cyprus Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Austria Portugal Slovenia Finland Sweden

Other (please specify ISO-code):

4.3.2.5. Email:

4.3.2.6. Role in the proceedings (*)

4.3.2.6.1. Claimant

4.3.2.6.2. Defendant

4.3.2.6.3. Other (please specify):

4.4. The decision was given in default of appearance (*)

4.4.1. Yes (please indicate the date (dd/mm/yyyy) on which the document instituting the proceedings or the equivalent document was served on the person concerned):

4.4.2. No

(*) Mandatory information.

(1) Please indicate the most relevant number if applicable.

4.5. Is registration in a public register sought?

4.5.1. Yes

4.5.2. No

4.6. If YES under point 4.5.1, the decision is no longer subject to ordinary appeal, including any appeal to the Court of last instance:

4.6.1. Yes

4.6.2. No

5. Enforceability of the decision

5.1. Is attestation sought for the purpose of enforcement of the decision in another Member State? (*)

5.1.1. Yes

5.1.2. No

5.1.3. Don’t know

5.2. If YES under point 5.1.1, the decision is enforceable in the Member State of origin without any further conditions having to be met (*)

5.2.1. Yes (please specify the enforceable obligation(s)):

5.2.2. Yes, but limited to part(s) of the decision (please specify the enforceable obligation(s)):

5.2.3. The obligation(s) is (are) enforceable against the following person(s):

5.2.3.1. Party A

(*) Mandatory information.

5.2.3.2. Party B

5.2.3.3. Other (please specify):

6. Interest

6.1. Is recovery of interest sought? (*)

6.1.1. Yes

6.1.2. No

6.2. If YES under point 6.1.1 (*)

6.2.1. Interest

6.2.1.1. Not specified in the decision

6.2.1.2. Yes, specified in the decision as follows

6.2.1.2.1. Interest due from: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)to: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event) (1)

6.2.1.2.2. Final Amount:

6.2.1.2.3. Method to calculate the interest

6.2.1.2.3.1. Rate: %

6.2.1.2.3.2. Rate: % over reference rate (ECB/reference rate of national centralbank: )

in force on: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

6.2.2. Statutory interest to be calculated in accordance with (please specify relevant statute):

6.2.2.1. Interest due from: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)to: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event) (1)

6.2.2.2. Method to calculate the interest

6.2.2.2.1. Rate: %

6.2.2.2.2. Rate: % over reference rate (ECB/reference rate of national central bank: )

in force on: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

6.2.2.2.2.1. First date of the respective semester in which the debtor is overdue

6.2.2.2.2.2. Other event (please specify):

(*) Mandatory information.

(1) Add the number of periods necessary if more than one period.

6.2.3. Capitalisation of interest (please specify):

6.2.4. Currency

euro (EUR) lev (BGN)

Czech koruna (CZK) kuna (HRK)

krona (SEK) Other (please specify (ISO code)):

7. Costs or expenses

7.1. Parties having benefited from complete or partial legal aid

7.1.1. Party A

7.1.2. Party B

7.1.3. Other Party (please specify):

7.2. Parties having benefited from exemption from costs or expenses

7.2.1. Party A

7.2.2. Party B

7.2.3. Other Party (please specify):

7.3. Is recovery of costs or expenses sought? (*)

7.3.1. Yes (1)

7.3.2. No

7.4. If YES under point 7.3.1, the following person(s) against whom enforcement is sought has/have been ordered to bear the costs or expenses (*)

7.4.1. Party A

7.4.2. Party B

7.4.3. Other Party (please specify):

7.4.4. If more than one person has to bear the costs or expenses, may the whole amount be collected from any of them?

(*) Mandatory information.

(1) This point also covers situations where the costs or expenses are awarded in a separate decision.

7.4.4.1. Yes

7.4.4.2. No

7.5. If YES under point 7.3.1, the costs or expenses for which recovery is sought are as follows (in the event that the costs or expenses may be recovered from several persons, insert the breakdown for each person separately) (*)

7.5.1. The costs or expenses have been fixed in the decision by way of a total amount (please specify the amount):

7.5.2. The costs or expenses have been fixed in the decision by way of a percentage of total costs (please specify percentage of total): %.

7.5.3. Liability for the costs or expenses has been determined in the decision and the exact amounts are as follows:

7.5.3.1. Court fees:

7.5.3.2. Lawyers’ fees:

7.5.3.3. Cost of service of documents:

7.5.3.4. Other (please specify):

7.5.4. Other (please specify):

7.6. If YES under point 7.3.1 (*)

7.6.1. Interest on costs or expenses

7.6.1.1. Not specified in the decision

7.6.1.2. Yes, specified in the decision as follows

7.6.1.2.1. Interest due from: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

to: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event) (1)

7.6.1.2.2. Final amount:

7.6.1.2.3. Method to calculate the interest

7.6.1.2.3.1. Rate: %

7.6.1.2.3.2. Rate: % over reference rate (ECB/reference rate of national central bank: ) in force on: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

7.6.2. Statutory interest to be calculated in accordance with (please specify relevant statute):

(*) Mandatory information.

(1) Add the number of periods necessary if more than one period.

7.6.2.1. Interest due from: . (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

to: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event) (1)

7.6.2.2. Method to calculate the interest

7.6.2.2.1. Rate: %

7.6.2.2.2. Rate: % over reference rate (ECB/reference rate of national central bank )

in force on: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

7.6.3. Capitalisation of interest (please specify):

7.6.4. Currency

euro (EUR) lev (BGN)

Czech koruna (CZK) kuna (HRK)

krona (SEK) Other (please specify (ISO code)):

If additional sheets have been attached, state the total number of pages (*)

Done at (*): on (*): (dd/mm/yyyy)

Signature and/or stamp of the court or competent authority issuing the attestation (*):

(1) Add the number of periods necessary if more than one period.

(*) Mandatory information.

ATTESTATION

CONCERNING AN AUTHENTIC INSTRUMENT IN A MATTER OF MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY REGIMES

(Articles 58(1) and 59(2) of of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 implementing enhancedcooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement ofdecisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes (1))

1. Member State of origin (*)

Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Germany Greece Spain France Croatia Italy Cyprus Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Austria Portugal Slovenia Finland Sweden

2. Authority having established the authentic instrument and issuing the attestation

2.1. Name and designation of authority (*):

2.2. Address

2.2.1. Street and number/PO box (*):

2.2.2. Place and postcode (*):

2.3. Telephone (*):

2.4. Fax

2.5. Email:

2.6. Other relevant information (please specify):

3. Authentic instrument

3.1. Date (dd/mm/yyyy) on which the authentic instrument was drawn up (*):

3.2. Reference number of the authentic instrument:

3.3. Date (dd/mm/yyyy) on which the authentic instrument was

3.3.1. registered at the register in the Member State of origin OR

3.3.2. deposited at the register in the Member State of origin

(1) OJ L 183, 8.7.2016, p. 1.

(*) Mandatory information.

(3.3.1 or 3.3.2 to be completed ONLY if different from the date indicated in point 3.1 and if the date of registration/deposit at the register determines the legal effect of the instrument)

3.3.3. Reference number in the register:

3.4. Parties to the authentic instrument (1)

3.4.1. Party A

3.4.1.1. Surname and given name(s) (*):

3.4.1.2. Date (dd/mm/yyyy) and place of birth:

3.4.1.3. Identification number (2)

3.4.1.3.1. Identity number:

3.4.1.3.2. Social security number:

3.4.1.3.3. Other (please specify):

3.4.1.4. Address

3.4.1.4.1. Street and number/PO box:

3.4.1.4.2. Place and postcode:

3.4.1.4.3. Country

Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Germany Greece Spain France Croatia Italy Cyprus Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Austria Portugal Slovenia Finland Sweden

Other (please specify ISO-code):

3.4.2. Party B

3.4.2.1. Surname and given name(s) (*):

3.4.2.2. Date (dd/mm/yyyy) and place of birth:

3.4.2.3. Identification number (2)

3.4.2.3.1. Identity number:

3.4.2.3.2. Social security number:

3.4.2.3.3. Other (please specify):

3.4.2.4. Address

(1) If the authentic instrument concerns more than two parties, please attach an additional sheet.

(*) Mandatory information.

(2) Please indicate the most relevant number if applicable.

3.4.2.4.1. Street and number/PO box:

3.4.2.4.2. Place and postcode:

3.4.2.4.3. Country

Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Germany Greece Spain France Croatia Italy Cyprus Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Austria Portugal Slovenia Finland Sweden

Other (please specify ISO-code):

4. Acceptance of the authentic instrument (Article 58 of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103)

4.1. Is acceptance of the authentic instrument sought? (*)

4.1.1. Yes

4.1.2. No

4.2. Authenticity of the instrument ((*) if YES under point 4.1.1)

4.2.1. Under the law of the Member State of origin, the authentic instrument has specific evidentiary effects compared to other written documents (*).

4.2.1.1. The specific evidentiary effects concern the following elements: (*)

4.2.1.1.1. the date the authentic instrument was drawn up

4.2.1.1.2. the place where the authentic instrument was drawn up

4.2.1.1.3. the origin of the signatures from the parties of the authentic instrument

4.2.1.1.4. the content of the declarations of the parties

4.2.1.1.5. the facts that the authority declares as having been verified in its presence

4.2.1.1.6. the actions which the authority declares to have carried out

4.2.1.1.7. other (please specify):

4.2.2. Under the law of the Member State of origin, the authentic instrument loses its specific evidentiary effects on the basis of (please indicate if relevant):

4.2.2.1. a judicial decision given in

4.2.2.1.1. an ordinary judicial procedure

4.2.2.1.2. a special judicial procedure provided by the law for this purpose (please indicate the name and/or the relevant legal references):

(*) Mandatory information.

4.2.2.2. Other (please specify):

4.2.3. To the knowledge of the authority, the authentic instrument has not been challenged in the Member State of origin as to its authenticity (*).

4.3. Legal acts and relationships recorded in the authentic instrument ((*) if YES under point 4.1.1)

4.3.1. To the knowledge of the authority, the authentic instrument (*):

4.3.1.1. is not challenged as to the legal acts and/or legal relationships recorded

4.3.1.2. is being challenged as to the legal acts and/or legal relationships recorded on specific points not covered by this attestation (please specify):

4.3.2. Other relevant information (please specify):

5. Other information

5.1. In the Member State of origin, the authentic instrument is a valid document for the purposes of recording a right in immovable or movable property in its registers (1).

5.1.1. Yes (please specify):

5.1.2. No

6. Enforceability of the authentic instrument (Article 59 of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103)

6.1. Is enforcement of the authentic instrument sought? (*)

6.1.1. Yes

(*) Mandatory information.

(1) The recording in a register of a right in immovable or movable property is subject to the law of the Member State in which the register is kept.

6.1.2. No

6.2. If YES under point 6.1.1, is the authentic instrument enforceable in the Member State of origin without any further conditions having to be met? (*)

6.2.1. Yes (please specify the enforceable obligation(s)):

6.2.2. Yes, but limited to part(s) of the authentic instrument (please specify the enforceableobligation(s)):

6.2.3. The obligation(s) is(are) enforceable against the following person(s): (*)

6.2.3.1. Party A

6.2.3.2. Party B

6.2.3.3. Other (please specify):

7. Interest

7.1. Is recovery of interest sought? (*)

7.1.1. Yes

7.1.2. No

7.2. If YES under point 7.1.1 (*)

7.2.1. Interest

7.2.1.1. Not specified in the authentic instrument

7.2.1.2. Yes, specified in the authentic instrument as follows

7.2.1.2.1. Interest due from: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

to: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event) (1)

(*) Mandatory information.

(1) Add the number of periods necessary if more than one period.

7.2.1.2.2. Final amount:

7.2.1.2.3. Method to calculate the interest

7.2.1.2.3.1. Rate: %

7.2.1.2.3.2. Rate: % over reference rate (ECB/reference rate of national central bank: )

in force on: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

7.2.2. Statutory interest to be calculated in accordance with (specify relevant statute):

7.2.2.1. Interest due from: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

to: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event) (1)

7.2.2.2. Method to calculate the interest

7.2.2.2.1. Rate: %

7.2.2.2.2. Rate: % over reference rate (ECB/reference rate of national central bank: )

in force on: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

7.2.3. Capitalisation of interest (please specify):

7.2.4. Currency

euro (EUR) lev (BGN)

Czech koruna (CZK) kuna (HRK)

krona (SEK) Other (please specify (ISO code)):

If additional sheets have been added, state the total number of pages (*)

Done at (*): on (*): (dd/mm/yyyy)

Signature and/or stamp of the court or competent authority issuing the attestation (*):

(1) Add the number of periods necessary if more than one period.

(*) Mandatory information.

ATTESTATION

CONCERNING A COURT SETTLEMENT IN A MATTER OF MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY REGIMES

(Article 60(2) of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 implementing enhanced cooperation inthe area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions inmatters of matrimonial property regimes (1))

1. Member State of origin (*)

Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Germany Greece Spain France Croatia Italy Cyprus Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Austria Portugal Slovenia Finland Sweden

2. Court which approved the court settlement or before which the court settlement was concluded and issuing the attestation

2.1. Name and designation of court (2) (*):

2.2. Address

2.2.1. Street and number/PO box (*):

2.2.2. Place and postcode (*):

2.3. Telephone (*):

2.4. Fax

2.5. Email:

2.6. Other relevant information (please specify):

3. Court settlement

3.1. Date (dd/mm/yyyy) of the court settlement (*):

3.2. Reference number of court settlement (*):

(1) OJ L 183, 8.7.2016, p. 1.

(*) Mandatory information.

(2) In accordance with Article 3(2) of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103, the term ‘court’ includes under certain conditions, in addition to judicial authorities, other authorities and legal professionals with competence in matters of matrimonial property regimes which exercise judicial functions or act pursuant to a delegation of power by a judicial authority or act under the control of a judicial authority. The list of these other authorities and legal professionals is published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

3.3. Parties to the court settlement (1)

3.3.1. Party A

3.3.1.1. Surname and given name(s) (*):

3.3.1.2. Date (dd/mm/yyyy) and place of birth:

3.3.1.3. Identification number (2)

3.3.1.3.1. Identity number:

3.3.1.3.2. Social security number:

3.3.1.3.3. Other (please specify):

3.3.1.4. Address

3.3.1.4.1. Street and number/PO box:

3.3.1.4.2. Place and postcode:

3.3.1.4.3. Country

Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Germany Greece Spain France Croatia Italy Cyprus Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Austria Portugal Slovenia Finland Sweden

Other (please specify ISO-code):

3.3.1.5. Email:

3.3.1.6. Role in the proceedings (*)

3.3.1.6.1. Claimant

3.3.1.6.2. Defendant

3.3.1.6.3. Other (please specify):

3.3.2. Party B

3.3.2.1. Surname and given name(s) (*):

3.3.2.2. Date (dd/mm/yyyy) and place of birth:

3.3.2.3. Identification number (2)

(1) If the court settlement concerns more than two parties, please attach an additional sheet.

(*) Mandatory information.

(2) Please indicate the most relevant number if applicable.

3.3.2.3.1. Identity number:

3.3.2.3.2. Social security number:

3.3.2.3.3. Other (please specify):

3.3.2.4. Address

3.3.2.4.1. Street and number/PO box:

3.3.2.4.2. Place and postcode:

3.3.2.4.3. Country

Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Germany Greece Spain France Croatia Italy Cyprus Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Austria Portugal Slovenia Finland Sweden

Other (please specify ISO-code):

3.3.2.5. Email:

3.3.2.6. Role in the proceedings (*)

3.3.2.6.1. Claimant

3.3.2.6.2. Defendant

3.3.2.6.3. Other (please specify):

4. Enforceability of the court settlement

4.1. Is the court settlement enforceable in the Member State of origin without any further conditions having to be met? (*)

4.1.1. Yes (please specify the enforceable obligation(s)):

4.1.2. Yes, but limited to part(s) of the court settlement (please specify the enforceable obligation(s)):

4.2. The obligation is enforceable against the following person(s) (*)

(*) Mandatory information.

4.2.1. Party A

4.2.2. Party B

4.2.3. Other (please specify):

5. Interest

5.1. Is recovery of interest sought? (*)

5.1.1. Yes

5.1.2. No

5.2. If YES under point 5.1.1 (*)

5.2.1. Interest

5.2.1.1. Not specified in the court settlement

5.2.1.2. Yes, specified in the court settlement as follows:

5.2.1.2.1. Interest due from: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

to: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event) (1)

5.2.1.2.2. Final amount:

5.2.1.2.3. Method to calculate the interest

5.2.1.2.3.1. Rate: %

5.2.1.2.3.2. Rate: % over reference rate (ECB/reference rate of national central bank: )

in force on: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

5.2.2. Statutory interest to be calculated in accordance with (specify relevant statute):

5.2.2.1. Interest due from: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

to: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event) (1)

5.2.2.2. Method to calculate the interest

5.2.2.2.1. Rate: %

5.2.2.2.2. Rate: % over reference rate (ECB/reference rate of national central bank: )

in force on: (date (dd/mm/yyyy) or event)

(*) Mandatory information.

(1) Add the number of periods necessary if more than one period.

5.2.3. Capitalisation of interest (please specify):

5.2.4. Currency

euro (EUR) lev (BGN)

Czech koruna (CZK) kuna (HRK)

krona (SEK) Other (please specify (ISO code)):

If additional sheets have been added, state the total number of pages (*)

Done at (*): on (*): (dd/mm/yyyy)

Signature and/or stamp of the court or competent authority issuing the attestation (*):

(*) Mandatory information.

’

Sole Article

The Association Council, by written procedure, recommends that the EU-Morocco Action Plan implementing the advanced status (2013-2017) be extended by one year.

1.   For the purpose of ensuring the continuous and practical implementation of certain elements of the Strategy, the Union shall promote the universalisation and effective implementation of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism (‘ICSANT’) by providing support for the activities of the UNODC, and in particular its Terrorism Prevention Branch (TPB), which, inter alia, supports the efforts of States to adhere to relevant international legal instruments and to strengthen their national legal and criminal justice frameworks and institutional capacity to counter nuclear terrorism, and the UNCCT programme on preventing and responding to weapons of mass destruction (‘WMD’)/chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (‘CBRN’) terrorism, which, inter alia, seeks to support States and international organisations in preventing terrorist groups from accessing and using WMD/CBRN materials and in ensuring that they are better prepared for, and can effectively respond to, a terrorist attack involving WMD/CBRN materials.

2.   The projects to be financed by the Union shall aim to:

(a)	increase the number of States Parties to ICSANT;

(b)	increase ICSANT awareness among beneficiaries, such as national policy- and decision-makers, including members of parliament, and in international fora;

(c)	improve national legislation by incorporating all ICSANT requirements;

(d)	develop e-learning and other relevant training materials and incorporate them into technical legal assistance delivery, including, inter alia, case studies;

(e)	develop and maintain a reference website containing all ICSANT-relevant information, including good practices;

(f)	enhance the capacities of criminal justice officials and other relevant national stakeholders with regard to the investigation, prosecution and adjudication of cases;

(g)	develop synergies with other relevant international legal instruments, such as the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and the Amendment thereto, and UN Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1540 (2004);

(h)	strengthen the capacity of States to detect and respond to the threat of terrorists acquiring nuclear or other radioactive materials.

The projects shall be implemented by the UNODC and the UNCCT in close collaboration with relevant UNODC field offices and other relevant institutions and experts, including the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, the Group of Experts of the UNSC Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1540 (2004) and the EU CBRN Risk Mitigation Centres of Excellence.

In the implementation of the projects, both Union visibility and proper programme management shall be ensured.

All project components shall be supported by proactive and innovative public outreach activities, and resources shall be allocated accordingly.

A detailed description of the projects is set out in the Annex.

1.   The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘the High Representative’) shall be responsible for the implementation of this Decision.

2.   The technical implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2) shall be carried out by the UNODC and the UNCCT. They shall perform that task under the responsibility of the High Representative. For that purpose, the High Representative shall enter into the necessary arrangements with the UNODC and the UNCCT.

1.   The financial reference amount for the implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2) shall be EUR 4 999 986. The total estimated budget of the overall project shall be EUR 5 223 907, which shall be provided through co-financing.

2.   The expenditure financed by the financial reference amount set out in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the Union budget.

3.   The Commission shall supervise the proper management of the financial reference amount referred to in paragraph 1. For that purpose, it shall conclude financing agreements with the UNODC and the UNCCT. The financing agreements shall stipulate that the UNODC and the UNCCT have to ensure the visibility of the Union contribution, appropriate to its size.

4.   The Commission shall endeavour to conclude the financing agreements referred to in paragraph 3 as soon as possible after the entry into force of this Decision. It shall inform the Council of any difficulties in that process and of the date of conclusion of the financing agreements.

1.   The High Representative shall report to the Council twice a year on the implementation of this Decision on the basis of regular reports prepared by the UNODC and the UNCCT. Those reports shall form the basis for the evaluation carried out by the Council.

2.   The Commission shall provide information twice a year on the financial aspects of the implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2).

’.

‘1.

Gabriel JOK RIAK MAKOL (alias: a) Gabriel Jok b) Jok Riak c) Jock Riak) Title: Lieutenant General Designation: a) Former Sudan People's Liberation Army's (SPLA) Sector One Commander; b) Chief of Defence Forces Date of Birth: 1 Jan. 1966 Place of Birth: Bor, Sudan/South Sudan Nationality: South Sudan Passport no: South Sudan number D00008623 National identification no: M6600000258472 Address: a) Unity State, South Sudan b) Wau, Western Bahr El Ghazal, South Sudan Date of UN designation: 1 Jul. 2015 Other information: Appointed as Chief of Defence Forces on 2 May 2018. Commanded SPLA Sector One, which operates primarily within Unity State, since January 2013. In his position as the SPLA Sector One commander, he has expanded or extended the conflict in South Sudan through breaches of the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement. The SPLA is a South Sudanese military entity that has engaged in actions that have extended the conflict in South Sudan, including breaches of the January 2014 Cessation of Hostilities Agreement and the May 9, 2014 Agreement to Resolve the Crisis in South Sudan, which was a re-commitment to the CoHA and has obstructed the activities of IGAD's Monitoring and Verification Mechanism. INTERPOL-UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/notice/search/un/5879060 Information from the narrative summary of reasons for listing provided by the Sanctions Committee: Gabriel Jok Riak was listed on 1 July 2015 pursuant to paragraphs 7(a), 7(f) and 8 of resolution 2206 (2015) for, “actions or policies that have the purpose or effect of expanding or extending the conflict in South Sudan or obstructing reconciliation or peace talks or processes, including breaches of the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement”; “the obstruction of the activities of international peacekeeping, diplomatic, or humanitarian missions in South Sudan, including IGAD's Monitoring and Verification Mechanism or of the delivery or distribution of, or access to, humanitarian assistance”; and as a leader “of any entity, including any South Sudanese government, opposition, militia, or other group, that has, or whose members have, engaged in any of the activities described in paragraphs 6 and 7”. Gabriel Jok Riak is the commander of the Sudan People's Liberation Army's (SPLA) Sector One, a South Sudanese military entity that has engaged in actions that have extended the conflict in South Sudan, including breaches of the January 2014 Cessation of Hostilities Agreement (CoHA) and the May 9, 2014 Agreement to Resolve the Crisis in South Sudan (May Agreement), which was a re-commitment to the CoHA. Jok Riak has commanded SPLA Sector One, which operates primarily within Unity State, since January 2013. SPLA Divisions Three, Four, and Five are subordinate to Sector One and its commander, Jok Riak. Jok Riak and SPLA Sector One and Three forces under his overall command engaged in several actions, as detailed below, that violated the January 2014 CoHA's commitments to cease all military actions aimed at opposing forces, as well as other provocative actions, freeze forces in their current locations, and refrain from activities such as movement of forces or ammunition resupply that could lead to military confrontation. SPLA forces under Jok Riak's overall command breached the CoHA agreement several times through outright hostilities. On January 10, 2014, an SPLA force under the overall command of Sector One commander Jok Riak captured Bentiu, which had previously been under Sudan People's Liberation Army in Opposition (SPLM-IO) control since December 20, 2013. SPLA Division Three ambushed and shelled SPLM-IO fighters near Leer soon after the signing of the January 2014 CoHA and in mid-April 2014 captured Mayom and killed more than 300 SPLM-IO troops. On May 4, 2014, an SPLA force led by Jok Riak again recaptured Bentiu. On state television in Juba, an SPLA spokesman said that the government army commanded by Jok Riak had captured Bentiu at four in the afternoon, adding that Division Three and a special SPLA taskforce were involved. Hours after the May Agreement was announced, SPLA Third and Fourth Division forces engaged and repelled opposition fighters who had earlier attacked SPLA positions near Bentiu and in the northern oil regions of South Sudan. Also after the signing of the May Agreement, SPLA Division Three troops recaptured Wang Kai, and the division commander, Santino Deng Wol, authorized his forces to kill anyone carrying weapons or hiding in homes, and ordered them to burn any homes containing opposition forces. In late April and May 2015, SPLA Sector One forces led by Jok Riak conducted a full-scale military offensive against opposition forces in Unity State from Lakes State. In violation of the terms of the CoHA as detailed above, Jok Riak reportedly sought to have tanks repaired and modified for use against opposition forces in early September 2014. In late October 2014, at least 7 000 SPLA troops and heavy weapons from the Third and Fifth Divisions were redeployed to reinforce Fourth Division troops bearing the brunt of an opposition attack near Bentiu. In November 2014, the SPLA brought new military equipment and weaponry, including armored personnel carriers, helicopters, artillery guns, and ammunition into Sector One's area of responsibility, likely in preparation for fighting against the opposition. In early February 2015, Jok Riak reportedly ordered armored personnel carriers to be sent to Bentiu, possibly to respond to recent ambushes by the opposition. Subsequent to the April and May 2015 offensive in Unity State, SPLA Sector One denied requests by the Intergovernmental Authority on Development Monitoring and Verification Team (IGAD-MVM) in Bentiu to investigate this violation of the CoHA; thereby denying the IGAD-MVM freedom of movement to carry out its mandate. Additionally, in April 2014, Jok Riak expanded the conflict in South Sudan by reportedly assisting in arming and mobilizing as many as 1 000 Dinka youths to supplement traditional SPLA forces.’