ISSN 1977-0677
Official Journal
of the European Union
L 15
English edition
Legislation
Volume 59
22 January 2016
|
ISSN 1977-0677 |
||
|
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 15 |
|
|
|
||
|
English edition |
Legislation |
Volume 59 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Text with EEA relevance |
|
EN |
Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
II Non-legislative acts
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
|
22.1.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 15/1 |
Information concerning the entry into force of the Additional Protocol to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Croatia to the European Union
The Additional Protocol to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Croatia to the European Union (1), signed on 25 March 2014, has, in accordance with Article 9.1 thereof, entered into force on 1 January 2016.
(1) OJ L 140, 14.5.2014, p. 3.
REGULATIONS
|
22.1.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 15/2 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2016/67
of 19 January 2016
amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for ametoctradin, chlorothalonil, diphenylamine, flonicamid, fluazinam, fluoxastrobin, halauxifen-methyl, propamocarb, prothioconazole, thiacloprid and trifloxystrobin in or on certain products
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC (1), and in particular Article 14(1)(a) thereof,
Whereas:
|
(1) |
For chlorothalonil, propamocarb, thiacloprid and trifloxystrobin, maximum residue levels (MRLs) were set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. For ametoctradin, flonicamid, fluazinam, fluoxastrobin and prothioconazole MRLs were set in Part A of Annex III to that Regulation. For diphenylamine MRLs were set in Annex V and Part A of Annex III to that Regulation. For halauxifen-methyl, no specific MRLs were set nor was that substance included in Annex IV to that Regulation, so the default value of 0,01 mg/kg laid down in Article 18(1)(b) thereof applies. |
|
(2) |
In the context of a procedure for the authorisation of the use of a plant protection product containing the active substance ametoctradin on sage and basil, an application was submitted in accordance with Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 for modification of the existing MRLs. |
|
(3) |
As regards flonicamid, such an application was submitted for peppers, Brussels sprouts, peas (without pods), cotton seeds, barley, oat and rye. As regards fluazinam, such an application was submitted for tomatoes. As regards fluoxastrobin and prothioconazole, such applications were submitted for shallots. As regards propamocarb, such an application was submitted for leeks. As regards thiacloprid, such an application was submitted for Jerusalem artichokes. |
|
(4) |
In accordance with Article 6(2) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 an application was submitted for chlorothalonil used on cranberries. The applicant claims that the authorised uses of that substance on such crop in the United States of America lead to residues exceeding the MRL contained in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and that a higher MRL is necessary to avoid trade barriers for the importation of that crop. |
|
(5) |
In accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, those applications were evaluated by the Member States concerned and the evaluation reports were forwarded to the Commission. |
|
(6) |
The European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter ‘the Authority’, assessed the applications and the evaluation reports, examining in particular the risks to the consumer and, where relevant, to animals and gave reasoned opinions on the proposed MRLs (2). It forwarded those opinions to the Commission and the Member States and made them available to the public. |
|
(7) |
As regards propamocarb, the Authority recommends setting a new MRL on leeks at the level of 30 mg/kg, which was derived by rounding up the value of 20 mg/kg calculated with the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) MRL calculator. By applying the cooking factor of 0,88 derived for leafy crops to leeks, such proposed MRL will not result in an exceedence of the acute reference dose, thus being safe for the consumer. However, given the concerns raised by some Member States, it is more appropriate to set the MRL at the unrounded level of 20 mg/kg. Such value adequately covers the intended uses on leeks. |
|
(8) |
As regards all other applications, the Authority concluded that all requirements with respect to data were met and that the modifications to the MRLs requested by the applicants were acceptable with regard to consumer safety on the basis of a consumer exposure assessment for 27 specific European consumer groups. It took into account the most recent information on the toxicological properties of the substances. The Authority also concluded that neither the lifetime exposure to these substances via consumption of all food products that may contain them, nor the short-term exposure due to high consumption of the relevant crops and products showed that there is a risk that the acceptable daily intake or the acute reference dose is exceeded. |
|
(9) |
As regards diphenylamine, Commission Regulation (EU) No 772/2013 (3) set temporary MRLs for apples and pears. Monitoring data show that an unavoidable cross-contamination affecting untreated apples and pears still occurs. In order to provide the necessary time for business operators to completely remove the residues of diphenylamine in storage facilities, it is appropriate to maintain those temporary MRLs, which will be reviewed. The review will take into account the information available within 2 years from the publication of this Regulation. |
|
(10) |
On 5 July 2013 the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) (4) adopted a Codex maximum residue limit (CXL) for trifloxystrobin in olives for oil production. The CXL is safe for consumers in the Union (5) and should therefore be included in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as MRL. |
|
(11) |
As regards thiacloprid and trifloxystrobin, several MRLs were modified by Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1200 (6). That Regulation lowered the MRLs for thiacloprid in Jerusalem artichokes and for trifloxystrobin in olives for oil production to the relevant limits of determination as of 12 February 2016. In the interest of legal certainty, it is appropriate for the MRLs provided for by this Regulation, to apply from the same date. |
|
(12) |
For halauxifen-methyl, the Authority submitted a conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of that active substance (7). In that framework, it recommended to set MRLs covering the representative uses according to good agricultural practices in the Union. The Commission consulted the European Union reference laboratories on the appropriate limits of determination. |
|
(13) |
Based on the reasoned opinions of the Authority and taking into account the factors relevant to the matter under consideration, the appropriate modifications to the MRLs fulfil the requirements of Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. |
|
(14) |
Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
|
(15) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall however apply from 12 February 2016 as regards the MRL for thiacloprid in Jerusalem artichokes and the MRL for trifloxystrobin in olives for oil production.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 January 2016.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude JUNCKER
(2) EFSA scientific reports available online: http://www.efsa.europa.eu
Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for ametoctradin in sage and basil. EFSA Journal 2015;13(6):4153 (22 pp.).
Setting of an import tolerance for chlorothalonil in cranberries. EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4193 (21 pp.).
Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for flonicamid in several crops. EFSA Journal 2015;13(5):4103 (26 pp.).
Reasoned opinion on the setting of a new MRL for fluazinam in tomatoes. EFSA Journal 2015;13(6):4154 (23 pp.).
Modification of the existing maximum residue level (MRL) for fluoxastrobin in shallots. EFSA Journal 2015;13(6):4143 (19 pp.).
Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing maximum residue levels for propamocarb in onions, garlic, shallots and leeks. EFSA Journal 2015;13(4):4084 (20 pp.).
Modification of the existing maximum residue level (MRL) for prothioconazole in shallots. EFSA Journal 2015;13(5):4105 (20 pp.).
Modification of the existing maximum residue level for thiacloprid in Jerusalem artichokes. EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4191 (18 pp.).
(3) Commission Regulation (EU) No 772/2013 of 8 August 2013 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for diphenylamine in or on certain products (OJ L 217, 13.8.2013, p. 1).
(4) Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues reports available on: http://www.codexalimentarius.org/download/report/799/REP13_PRe.pdf
Joint FAO/WHO food standards programme Codex Alimentarius Commission. Appendices II and III. 36th Session. Rome, Italy, 1-5 July 2013.
(5) Scientific support for preparing an EU position for the 45th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR). EFSA Journal 2013;11(7):3312 (210 pp.) doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3312.
(6) Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1200 of 22 July 2015 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for amidosulfuron, fenhexamid, kresoxim-methyl, thiacloprid and trifloxystrobin in or on certain products (OJ L 195, 23.7.2015, p. 1).
(7) Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance halauxifen-methyl (XDE-729 methyl). EFSA Journal 2014;12(12):3913 (93 pp.).
ANNEX
Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are amended as follows:
|
(1) |
Annex II is amended as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2) |
In Part A of Annex III, the columns for ametoctradin, diphenylamine, flonicamid, fluazinam, fluoxastrobin and prothioconazole are replaced by the following: ‘Pesticide residues and maximum residue levels (mg/kg)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(3) |
In Annex V, the column for diphenylamine is deleted. |
(*) Indicates lower limit of analytical determination
|
(**) |
Pesticide-code combination for which the MRL as set in Annex III Part B applies. |
|
(F) |
= |
Fat soluble |
Chlorothalonil (R)
|
(R) |
= |
The residue definition differs for the following combinations pesticide-code number: Chlorothalonil — codes 1000000 to 1070000, except 1040000: 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) |
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on storage stability as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on anlytical methods and residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it]. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on pigs metabolism and in TRR in poultry commodities as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
Propamocarb (Sum of propamocarb and its salts, expressed as propamocarb) (R)
|
(R) |
= |
The residue definition differs for the following combinations pesticide-code number: code 1000000 except 1016000, 1030000 and 1040000: N-oxide propamocarb; codes 1016000 and 1030000: N-desmethyl propamocarb |
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods and a feeding study as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016 or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods and the hen feeding study as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016 or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods and a feeding study as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016 or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods and the hen feeding study as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016 or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
Thiacloprid
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 23 July 2017, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on crop metabolism with seed treatment as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 23 July 2017, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 23 July 2017, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
Trifloxystrobin (A) (F) (R)
|
(A) |
The EU reference labs identified the reference standard for CGA321113 as commercially not available. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the commercial availability of the reference standard referred to in the first sentence by 23 July 2016, or, if that reference standard is not commercially available by that date, the unavailability of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 23 July 2017, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 23 July 2017, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
(1) For the complete list of products of plant and animal origin to which MRLs apply, reference should be made to Annex I.
|
(F) |
= |
Fat soluble |
Chlorothalonil (R)
|
(R) |
= |
The residue definition differs for the following combinations pesticide-code number: Chlorothalonil — codes 1000000 to 1070000, except 1040000: 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) |
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on storage stability as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on anlytical methods and residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it]. Moreover, the European Food Safety Authority highlights that the metabolite 2,5,6-trichloro-4-hydroxyphtalonitrile (SDS-3701) has not been taken into account, given that a validated method for enforcement, a complete set of residue trials, storage stability studies and data on processing of SDS-3701 are unavailable for all plant commodities. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take this information into account, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on pigs metabolism and in TRR in poultry commodities as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 29 October 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
Propamocarb (Sum of propamocarb and its salts, expressed as propamocarb) (R)
|
(R) |
= |
The residue definition differs for the following combinations pesticide-code number: code 1000000 except 1016000, 1030000 and 1040000: N-oxide propamocarb; codes 1016000 and 1030000: N-desmethyl propamocarb |
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods and a feeding study as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016 or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods and the hen feeding study as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016 or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods and a feeding study as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016 or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods and the hen feeding study as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 22 March 2016 or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
Thiacloprid
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 23 July 2017, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on crop metabolism with seed treatment as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 23 July 2017, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 23 July 2017, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
Trifloxystrobin (A) (F) (R)
|
(A) |
The EU reference labs identified the reference standard for CGA321113 as commercially not available. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the commercial availability of the reference standard referred to in the first sentence by 23 July 2016, or, if that reference standard is not commercially available by that date, the unavailability of it.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on residue trials as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 23 July 2017, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
|
(+) |
The European Food Safety Authority identified some information on analytical methods as unavailable. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information referred to in the first sentence, if it is submitted by 23 July 2017, or, if that information is not submitted by that date, the lack of it.
|
(**) Indicates lower limit of analytical determination
|
(**) |
Pesticide-code combination for which the MRL as set in Annex III Part B applies. |
Halauxifen-methyl (sum of halauxifen-methyl and X11393729 (halauxifen), expressed as halauxifen-methyl)
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
(2) For the complete list of products of plant and animal origin to which MRLs apply, reference should be made to Annex I.
Halauxifen-methyl (sum of halauxifen-methyl and X11393729 (halauxifen), expressed as halauxifen-methyl)
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
(***) Indicates lower limit of analytical determination
(3) For the complete list of products of plant and animal origin to which MRLs apply, reference should be made to Annex I.
|
(F) |
= |
Fat soluble |
Ametoctradin (R)
|
(R) |
= |
The residue definition differs for the following combinations pesticide-code number: Ametoctradin — code 1000000 except 1040000: Ametoctradin, metabolite 4-(7-amino-5-ethyl [1,2,4]triazolo, [1,5-a]pyrimidin-6-yl) butanoic acid (M650F01) and metabolite 6-(7-amino-5-ethyl [1,2,4]triazolo [1,5-a]pyrimidin-6-yl) hexanoic acid (M650F06), expressed as ametoctradin |
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
Diphenylamine
|
(+) |
Monitoring data show that an unavoidable cross-contamination affecting untreated apples and pears still occurs. When re-viewing the MRL, the Commission will take into account the information available within 2 years from the date of publication.
|
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
Flonicamid (sum of flonicamid, TNFG and TNFA) (R)
|
(R) |
= |
The residue definition differs for the following combinations pesticide-code number: Flonicamid — code 1000000: Sum of flonicamid and TFNA-AM |
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
Fluazinam (F)
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
Fluoxastrobin
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
Prothioconazole (Prothioconazole-desthio) (R)
|
(R) |
= |
The residue definition differs for the following combinations pesticide-code number: Prothioconazole — code 1000000 except 1040000: Sum of prothioconazole-desthio and its glucuronide conjugate, expressed as prothioconazoledesthio. |
|
(+) |
The applicable maximum residue level for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the spice group (code 0840040) is the one set for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) in the Vegetables category, root and tuber vegetables group (code 0213040) taking into account changes in the levels by processing (drying) according to Art. 20 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
|
|
22.1.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 15/51 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/68
of 21 January 2016
on common procedures and specifications necessary for the interconnection of electronic registers of driver cards
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on tachographs in road transport (1), and in particular Article 31(5) thereof,
Whereas:
|
(1) |
Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 provides for the obligation of Member States to exchange data electronically in order to ensure the uniqueness of the driver cards issued. |
|
(2) |
In order to facilitate the exchange of electronic data on driver cards by Member States, the Commission set up the messaging system TACHOnet, which allows Member States to request information to the other Member States on the issuance of driver cards, as well as on their status. |
|
(3) |
Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 makes mandatory the interconnection of electronic national registers on driver cards throughout the Union, either using the TACHOnet messaging system or a compatible system. However, in case of a compatible system, the exchange of electronic data with all other Member States must be possible through the TACHOnet messaging system. |
|
(4) |
It is necessary therefore to lay down the compulsory common procedures and specifications for TACHOnet, including the format of the data exchanged, the technical procedures for electronic consultation of the national electronic registers, access procedures and security mechanisms. |
|
(5) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee referred to in Article 42(3) of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Subject-matter
This Regulation lays down the requirements regarding the obligatory connection of the national electronic registers on driver cards to the TACHOnet messaging system referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014.
Article 2
Definitions
In addition to the definitions laid down in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, the following definitions shall apply:
|
(a) |
‘asynchronous interface’ means a process whereby a message in response to a request is returned on a new HTTP connection; |
|
(b) |
‘broadcast search’ means a request message from a Member State addressed to all other Member States; |
|
(c) |
‘card issuing authority’ (‘CIA’) means the entity empowered by a Member State for the issuing and management of tachograph cards; |
|
(d) |
‘central hub’ means the information system enabling the routing of TACHOnet messages between Member States; |
|
(e) |
‘national system’ means the information system set up in each Member State for the purpose of emitting, processing and responding to TACHOnet messages; |
|
(f) |
‘synchronous interface’ means a process whereby a message in response to a request is returned on the same HTTP connection used for the request; |
|
(g) |
‘requesting Member State’ means the Member State emitting a request or a notification, which is then routed to the appropriate responding Member State(s); |
|
(h) |
‘responding Member State’ means the Member State to whom the TACHOnet request or notification is directed; |
|
(i) |
‘singlecast search’ means a request message from a Member State addressed to a single Member State; |
|
(j) |
‘tachograph card’, means either a driver card or a workshop card, as defined in Article 2(f) and (k) of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014. |
Article 3
Obligation to connect to TACHOnet
Member States shall connect the national electronic registers referred to in Article 31(1) of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, to TACHOnet messaging system.
Article 4
Technical specifications
TACHOnet messaging system shall fulfil the technical specifications laid down in Annexes I to VII.
Article 5
Use of TACHOnet
Member States shall follow the procedures set out in Annex VIII.
Member States shall provide access to TACHOnet messaging system to their national card issuing authorities and control officers carrying out the duties referred to in Article 38 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, in order to facilitate effective checks of the validity, status and uniqueness of driver cards.
Article 6
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall apply from 2 March 2018.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 21 January 2016.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude JUNCKER
ANNEX I
General aspects of TACHOnet messaging system
1. Architecture
TACHOnet messaging system shall be composed of the following parts:
|
1.1. |
A central hub, which shall be able to receive a request from the requesting Member State, validate it and process it by forwarding it to the responding Member States. The central hub shall wait for each responding Member State to answer, consolidate all the answers and forward the consolidated response to the requesting Member State. All TACHOnet messages shall be routed by the central hub. |
|
1.2. |
National systems of the Member States, which shall be fitted with an interface capable of both sending requests to the central hub and receiving the corresponding replies. National systems may use propriety or commercial software to transmit and receive messages from the central hub. |
2. Management
2.1. The central hub shall be managed by the Commission, which shall be responsible for the technical operation and maintenance of the central hub.
2.2. The central hub shall not store data for a period exceeding six months, other than the logging and statistical data set out in Annex VII.
2.3. The central hub shall not provide access to personal data, except for authorized Commission personnel, when necessary for the purpose of monitoring, maintenance and troubleshooting.
2.4. Member States shall be responsible for:
|
2.4.1. |
The setup and management of their national systems, including the interface with the central hub. |
|
2.4.2. |
The installation and maintenance of their national system, both hardware and software, whether proprietary or commercial. |
|
2.4.3. |
The correct interoperability of their national system with the central hub, including the management of error messages received from the central hub. |
|
2.4.4. |
Taking all the measures to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the information. |
|
2.4.5. |
The operation of the national systems in accordance with the service levels set out in Annex VI. |
2.5. MOVEHUB web portal
The Commission shall provide a web based application with secured access, referred to as ‘MOVEHUB web portal’, providing at least the following services:
|
(a) |
Member State availability statistics; |
|
(b) |
notification of maintenance on the central hub and Member State national systems; |
|
(c) |
aggregated reports; |
|
(d) |
contact management; |
|
(e) |
XSD schemas. |
2.6. Contact management
2.6.1. The contact management functionality shall provide each Member State with the ability to manage the contact details regarding policy, business, operational and technical users of that Member State, being each Member State's competent authority the responsible for the maintenance of its own contacts. It shall be possible to view, but not edit, the contact details of the other Member States.
2.6.2. TACHOnet shall use the contact details referred to in point 2.6.1 to populate the contact details in response messages.
ANNEX II
Functionalities of TACHOnet messaging system
1. The following functionalities shall be provided through TACHOnet messaging system:
|
1.1. |
Check Issued Cards (CIC): allows the requesting Member State to send a Check Issued Cards Request to one or all responding Member States, to determine if a card applicant already possesses a driver card issued by the responding Member States. The responding Member States shall reply to the request by sending a Check Issued Cards Response. |
|
1.2. |
Check Card Status (CCS): allows the requesting Member State to ask the responding Member State about the details of a card issued by the latter by sending a Check Card Status Request. The responding Member State shall reply to the request by sending a Check Card Status Response. |
|
1.3. |
Modify Card Status (MCS): allows the requesting Member State to notify the responding Member State, through a Modify Card Status Request, that the status of a card issued by the latter has changed. The responding Member State shall reply with a Modify Card Status Acknowledgement. |
|
1.4. |
Issued Card Driving License (ICDL): allows the requesting Member State to notify the responding Member State, through an Issued Card Driving Licence Request, that a card has been issued by the former against a driving licence issued by the latter. The responding Member State shall reply with an Issued Card Driving Licence Response. |
2. Other message types deemed suitable for the efficient functioning of TACHOnet shall be included, for instance error notifications.
3. National systems shall recognize the card statuses listed in the Appendix to this Annex, when using any of the functionalities described in point 1. However, Member States are not required to implement an administrative procedure that makes use of all of the listed statuses.
4. When a Member State receives a response or notification giving a status that is not used in its administrative procedures, the national system shall translate the status on the received message to the appropriate value in that procedure. The message shall not be rejected by the responding Member State, as long as the status in the message is listed in the Appendix of this Annex.
5. The card status listed in the Appendix to this Annex shall not be used to determine if a driver card is valid for driving. When a Member State queries the register of the card issuing Member State via the CCS functionality, the response shall contain the dedicated field ‘valid for driving’. The national administrative procedures shall be such that CCS responses always contain the appropriate ‘valid for driving’ value.
Appendix
Card statuses
|
Card Status |
Definition |
|
Application |
The CIA has received an application to issue a driver card. This information has been registered and stored in the database with the generated search keys. |
|
Approved |
The CIA has approved the application for the tachograph card. |
|
Rejected |
The CIA did not approve the application. |
|
Personalised |
The tachograph card has been personalised. |
|
Dispatched |
The National Authority has dispatched the driver card to the relevant driver or delivering agency. |
|
Handed Over |
The National Authority has handed over the driver card to the relevant driver. |
|
Confiscated |
The driver card has been taken from the driver by the competent authority. |
|
Suspended |
The driver card has been taken temporarily from the driver. |
|
Withdrawn |
The CIA has decided to withdraw the driver card. The card has been permanently invalidated. |
|
Surrendered |
The tachograph card has been returned to the CIA, and declared no longer needed. |
|
Lost |
The tachograph card has been declared lost to the CIA. |
|
Stolen |
The tachograph card has been reported stolen to the CIA. A stolen card is considered lost. |
|
Malfunctioning |
The tachograph card has been reported as malfunctioning to the CIA. |
|
Expired |
The period of validity of the tachograph card has expired. |
|
Replaced |
The tachograph card, which has been reported lost, stolen or malfunctioning, has been replaced by a new card. The data on the new card is the same, with the exception of the card number replacement index, which has been increased by one. |
|
Renewed |
The tachograph card has been renewed because of a change of administrative data or the validity period coming to an end. The card number of the new card is the same, with the exception of the card number renewal index, which has been increased by one. |
|
In Exchange |
The CIA that issued a driver card has received a notification that the procedure to exchange that card for a driver card issued by the CIA of another Member State has started. |
|
Exchanged |
The CIA that issued a driver card has received a notification that the procedure to exchange that card for a driver card issued by the CIA of another Member State has completed. |
ANNEX III
Message provisions of TACHOnet messaging system
1. General technical requirements
1.1. The central hub shall provide both synchronous and asynchronous interfaces for the exchange of messages. Member States may choose the most suitable technology to interface with their own applications.
1.2. All messages exchanged between the central hub and the national systems must be UTF-8 encoded.
1.3. National systems shall be capable of receiving and processing messages containing Greek or Cyrillic characters.
2. XML messages structure and Schema definition (XSD)
2.1. The general structure of XML messages shall follow the format defined by the XSD schemas installed in the central hub.
2.2. The central hub and the national systems shall transmit and receive messages that conform to the message XSD schema.
2.3. National systems shall be capable of sending, receiving and processing all messages corresponding to any of the functionalities set out in Annex I.
2.4. The XML messages shall include at least the minimum requirements laid down in the Appendix to this Annex.
Appendix
Minimum requirements for the content of the XML messages
|
Common Header |
Mandatory |
|
|
Version |
The official version of the XML specifications will be specified through the namespace defined in the message XSD and in the version attribute of the Header element of any XML message. The version number (‘n.m’) will be defined as fixed value in every release of the XML Schema Definition file (xsd). |
Yes |
|
Test Identifier |
Optional id for testing. The originator of the test will populate the id and all participants in the workflow will forward/return the same id. In production it should be ignored and will not be used if it is supplied. |
No |
|
Technical Identifier |
A UUID uniquely identifying each individual message. The sender generates a UUID and populates this attribute. This data is not used in any business capacity. |
Yes |
|
Workflow Identifier |
The workflowId is a UUID and should be generated by the requesting Member State. This id is then used in all messages to correlate the workflow. |
Yes |
|
Sent At |
The date and time (UTC) that the message was sent. |
Yes |
|
Timeout |
This is an optional date and time (in UTC format) attribute. This value will be set only by the Hub for forwarded requests. This will inform the responding Member State of the time when the request will be timed out. This value is not required in MS2TCN_<x>_Req and all response messages. It is optional so that the same header definition can be used for all message types regardless of whether or not the timeoutValue attribute is required. |
No |
|
From |
The ISO 3166-1 Alpha 2 code of the Member State sending the message or ‘EU’. |
Yes |
|
To |
The ISO 3166-1 Alpha 2 code of the Member State to which the message is being sent or ‘EU’. |
Yes |
|
Check Issued Cards Request |
Mandatory |
|
|
Family Name |
Driver's family as displayed on the card. |
Yes |
|
First Name |
Driver's first/given name as detailed on the card (a missing first name does not indicate a wildcard search). |
No |
|
Date of Birth |
Driver's date of birth as displayed on the card. |
Yes |
|
Driving Licence Number |
The driver's driving licence number. |
No |
|
Driving Licence Issuing Country |
The country that issued the driver's driving licence. |
No |
|
Check Issued Cards Response |
Mandatory |
|
|
Status Code |
The status code of the search (e.g. found, not found, error, etc.). |
Yes |
|
Status Message |
An explanatory status description (if necessary). |
No |
|
Found Driver Details |
Yes |
|
|
Family Name |
The family name of any found drivers. |
Yes |
|
First Name |
The first name(s) of any found drivers. |
No |
|
Date of Birth |
The date of birth of any found drivers. |
Yes |
|
Place of Birth |
The place of birth of any found drivers. |
No |
|
Driver Card Number |
The found driver's card number. |
Yes |
|
Driver Card Status |
The found driver's card status. |
Yes |
|
Driver Card Issuing Authority |
The name of the authority that issued the found driver's card. |
Yes |
|
Driver Card Start of Validity Date |
The date of the start of validity of the found driver's card. |
Yes |
|
Driver Card Expiry Date |
The date of expiry the found driver's card. |
Yes |
|
Driver Card Status Modified Date |
The date that the found driver's card was last modified. |
Yes |
|
Search Mechanism |
Was the card found by the NYSIIS search or a custom search. |
Yes |
|
Temporary Card |
The found card is a temporary card |
No |
|
Driving Licence Number |
The found driver's driving licence number. |
Yes |
|
Driving Licence Issuing Country |
The issuing country of the found driver's driving licence. |
Yes |
|
Driving Licence Status |
The status of the found driver's driving licence. |
No |
|
Driving Licence Issuing Date |
The issuing date of the found driver's driving licence. |
No |
|
Driving Licence Expiry Date |
The expiry date of the found driver's driving licence. |
No |
|
Check Card Status Request |
Mandatory |
|
|
Driver Card Number |
The number of the card for which details are required. |
Yes |
|
Check Card Status Response |
Mandatory |
|
|
Status Code |
The status code of the details request (e.g. found, not found, error, etc.). |
Yes |
|
Status Message |
An explanatory status description (if necessary). |
No |
|
Card Status |
The status of the requested card. |
Yes |
|
Card Issuing Authority |
The name of the authority that issued the requested card. |
Yes |
|
Card Start of Validity Date |
The date of the start of validity of the requested card. |
Yes |
|
Card Expiry Date |
The date of expiry the requested card. |
Yes |
|
Card Status Modified Date |
The date that the requested card was last modified. |
Yes |
|
Valid for Driving |
The found card is/is not valid for driving. |
Yes |
|
Temporary Card |
The found card is a temporary card |
No |
|
Workshop Card |
||
|
Workshop Name |
The name of the workshop to which the card was issued. |
Yes |
|
Workshop Address |
The address of the workshop to which the card was issued. |
Yes |
|
Family Name |
The family name of the person to whom the card is issued. |
No |
|
First Name |
The first name of the person to who the card is issued. |
No |
|
Date of Birth |
The date of birth of the person to whom the card is issued. |
No |
|
Card Holder Details |
||
|
Family Name |
The family name of the driver to whom the card was issued. |
Yes |
|
First Name |
The first name of the driver to whom the card was issued. |
No |
|
Date of Birth |
The date of birth of the driver to whom the card was issued. |
Yes |
|
Place of Birth |
The place of birth of the driver to whom the card was issued. |
No |
|
Driving Licence Number |
The driving licence number of the driver to whom the card was issued. |
Yes |
|
Driving Licence Issuing Country |
The country that issued driving licence number to the driver to whom the card was issued. |
Yes |
|
Driving Licence Status |
The status of the driving licence of the driver to whom the card was issued. |
No |
|
Driving Licence Issuing Date |
The issuing date of the driving licence of the driver to whom the card was issued. |
No |
|
Driving Licence Expiry Date |
The expiry date of the driving licence of the driver to whom the card was issued. |
No |
|
Modify Card Status Request |
Mandatory |
|
|
Driver Card Number |
The number of the card who's status has changed. |
Yes |
|
New Driver Card Status |
The status to which the card has been changed. |
Yes |
|
Modification Reason |
The (free text) reason for the card status change. |
No |
|
Driver Card Status Modified Date |
The date and time that the card status was modified. |
Yes |
|
Declared By |
||
|
Authority |
The name of the authority that made the card status change. |
Yes |
|
Family Name |
The family name of the person who made the card status change. |
No |
|
First Name |
The first name of the person who made the card status change. |
No |
|
Phone |
The phone number of the person who made the card status change. |
No |
|
|
The e-mail address of the person who made the card status change. |
No |
|
Modify Card Status Acknowledgement |
Mandatory |
|
|
Status Code |
The status code of the acknowledgement (ok, not found, error, etc.). |
Yes |
|
Acknowledgement type |
The type of the acknowledgment: for request or response |
Yes |
|
Status Message |
An explanatory status description (if necessary). |
No |
|
Modify Card Status Response |
Mandatory |
|
|
Status Code |
The status code of the register update (ok, not ok, error, etc.). |
Yes |
|
Status Message |
An explanatory status description (if necessary). |
No |
|
Issued Card Driving Licence Request |
Mandatory |
|
|
Driver Card Number |
The number of the driver card that has been issued. |
Yes |
|
Driving Licence Number |
The number of the foreign driving licence that was used to apply for the driver card. |
Yes |
|
Issued Card Driving Licence Response |
Mandatory |
|
|
Status Code |
A status code acknowledging the notification (ok, not ok, error, etc.). |
Yes |
|
Status Message |
An explanatory status description (if necessary). |
No |
|
Family Name |
The family name of the driver to whom the card was issued. |
Yes |
|
First Name |
The first name of the driver to whom the card was issued. |
No |
|
Date of Birth |
The date of birth of the driver to whom the card was issued. |
Yes |
ANNEX IV
Transliteration and NYSIIS (New York State Identification and Intelligence System) Services
1. The NYSIIS algorithm implemented in the central hub shall be used to encode the names of all the drivers in the national register.
2. When searching for a card via the CIC functionality the NYSIIS keys shall be used as the primary search mechanism.
3. Additionally, Member States may employ a custom algorithm to return additional results.
4. The search results shall indicate the search mechanism which was used to find a record, either NYSIIS or custom.
5. If a Member State chooses to record ICDL notifications then the NYSIIS keys contained in the notification shall be recorded as part of the ICDL data.
5.1. When searching the ICDL data the Member State shall use the NYSIIS keys of the applicant's name.
ANNEX V
Security requirements
1. HTTPS shall be used for the exchange of messages between the central hub and the national systems.
2. National systems shall use the PKI certificates provided by the Commission for the purposes of securing the transmission of messages between the national system and the central hub.
3. National systems shall implement, as a minimum, certificates using the SHA-2 (SHA-256) signature hash algorithm and a 2 048 bit public key length.
ANNEX VI
Service levels
1. National systems shall fulfil the following minimum level of service:
1.1. They shall be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
1.2. Their availability shall be monitored by a heartbeat message issued from the central hub.
1.3. Their availability rate shall be 98 %, according to the following table (the figures have been rounded to the nearest convenient unit):
|
An availability of |
means an unavailability of |
||
|
Daily |
Monthly |
Yearly |
|
|
98 % |
0,5 hours |
15 hours |
7,5 days |
Member States are encouraged to respect the daily availability rate, however it is recognised that certain necessary activities, such as system maintenance, require a down time of more than 30 minutes. However, the monthly and yearly availability rates remain mandatory.
1.4. They shall respond to a minimum of 98 % of the requests forwarded to them in one calendar month.
1.5. They shall respond to requests within 10 seconds.
1.6. The global request timeout (time within which the requestor may wait for a response) shall not exceed 20 seconds.
1.7. They shall be able to service a request rate of 6 messages per second.
1.8. National systems may not send requests to the TACHOnet hub at a rate exceeding 2 requests per second.
1.9. Every national system shall be able to cope with potential technical problems of the central hub or national systems in other Member States. These include, but are not limited to:
|
(a) |
loss of connection to the central hub; |
|
(b) |
no response to a request; |
|
(c) |
receipt of responses after message timeout; |
|
(d) |
receipt of unsolicited messages; |
|
(e) |
receipt of invalid messages. |
2. The central hub shall:
2.1. feature an availability rate of 98 %;
2.2. provide to national systems notification of any errors, either via the response message or via a dedicated error message. The national systems, in turn, shall receive these dedicated error messages and have an escalation workflow in place to take any appropriate action to rectify the notified error.
3. Maintenance
Member States shall notify other Member States and the Commission of any routine maintenance activities via the web application, at least one week before the beginning of those activities if technically possible.
ANNEX VII
Logging and Statistics of the data collected at the central hub
1. In order to ensure privacy, the data for statistical purposes shall be anonymous. Data identifying a specific card, driver or driver licence shall not be available for statistical purposes.
2. Logging information shall keep track of all transactions for monitoring and debugging purposes, and allow the generation of statistics about these transactions.
3. Personal data shall not be retained in the logs for more than 6 months. Statistical information shall be retained indefinitely.
4. The statistical data used for reporting shall include:
|
(a) |
the requesting Member State; |
|
(b) |
the responding Member State; |
|
(c) |
the type of message; |
|
(d) |
the status code of the response; |
|
(e) |
the date and time of the messages; |
|
(f) |
the response time. |
ANNEX VIII
Use of TACHOnet messaging system
1. Issuing of driver cards
1.1. When the applicant for a driver card holds a driving licence issued in a Member State different than the Member State of application, a broadcast Check Issued Card search shall be performed by the Member State of application.
1.2. Member States issuing a driver card to a driver holding a driving license issued in another Member State, shall immediately notify the latter, through the Issued Card Driving Licence function, that a driver card has been issued.
1.3. When the applicant for a driver card holds a driving licence issued in the Member State of application, and for which an ICDL notification had been previously recorded in its national register, the Member State shall perform either a singlecast CIC or a Check Card Status search to the Member State that sent the ICDL notification.
1.4. Every ICDL notification shall be recorded in the national register of the Member State receiving it.
1.5. Member States shall perform a broadcast CIC search for, at least, 30 % of applications presented by drivers holding a licence issued in that Member State.
1.6. Member States may choose not to use the ICDL functionality as provided for in points 1.3 to 1.5. In this case, they shall carry out a broadcast CIC search for every application received.
1.7. Member States shall notify the Commission by no later than the date of application of this Regulation on whether they will record the ICDL notifications in their national registers or they will follow the procedure in point 1.6.
1.8. Member States that, five years or less before the date of application of this Regulation, did not record ICDL notifications in their national registers as set out in point 1.4, shall perform a broadcast CIC search for the 100 % of applications, except for driving licences for which an ICDL notification has been recorded, in which case point 1.3 shall apply.
1.9. The obligation provided for in point 1.8 shall apply for a period of five years as from the date in which the recording of ICDL notifications has been effectively implemented in the national register of each Member State.
2. Withdrawn, suspended or stolen driver cards
2.1. If, in accordance with Article 26(7) and Article 29(2) of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, a driver card has been withdrawn, suspended or declared as stolen in a Member State other than the issuing Member State, the competent authority of the former shall:
|
(a) |
check the actual status of the card by sending a CCS request to the issuing Member State. If the number of the card is not known, a singlecast CIC request shall be sent before the aforementioned CCS request; |
|
(b) |
send a MCS notification through the TACHOnet messaging system to the issuing Member State. |
3. Exchange of driver cards
3.1. Where the holder of a driver card applies for the exchange of the driver card in a Member State other than the issuing Member State, the competent authority of the former shall check the actual status of the card by sending a CCS request to the latter.
3.2. Once the status of the driver card has been checked and it is valid for exchange, the competent authority of the Member State where the application has been made, shall send a MCS request through the TACHOnet messaging system to the issuing Member State.
3.3. Member States renewing or exchanging a driver card to a driver holding a driving license issued in another Member State, shall immediately notify the issuing Member State, through the ICDL function, that the driver card has been renewed or exchanged.
|
22.1.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 15/69 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/69
of 21 January 2016
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),
Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,
Whereas:
|
(1) |
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto. |
|
(2) |
The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 21 January 2016.
For the Commission,
On behalf of the President,
Jerzy PLEWA
Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development
(1) OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.
(2) OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
|
(EUR/100 kg) |
||
|
CN code |
Third country code (1) |
Standard import value |
|
0702 00 00 |
IL |
236,2 |
|
MA |
79,8 |
|
|
TN |
85,2 |
|
|
TR |
95,8 |
|
|
ZZ |
124,3 |
|
|
0707 00 05 |
MA |
85,6 |
|
TR |
150,9 |
|
|
ZZ |
118,3 |
|
|
0709 93 10 |
MA |
52,6 |
|
TR |
150,6 |
|
|
ZZ |
101,6 |
|
|
0805 10 20 |
EG |
49,1 |
|
MA |
61,0 |
|
|
TN |
58,2 |
|
|
TR |
66,0 |
|
|
ZZ |
58,6 |
|
|
0805 20 10 |
IL |
163,3 |
|
MA |
80,6 |
|
|
ZZ |
122,0 |
|
|
0805 20 30 , 0805 20 50 , 0805 20 70 , 0805 20 90 |
IL |
106,2 |
|
MA |
60,7 |
|
|
TR |
96,4 |
|
|
ZZ |
87,8 |
|
|
0805 50 10 |
TR |
99,3 |
|
ZZ |
99,3 |
|
|
0808 10 80 |
CL |
87,9 |
|
US |
107,7 |
|
|
ZZ |
97,8 |
|
|
0808 30 90 |
CN |
76,1 |
|
TR |
82,0 |
|
|
ZZ |
79,1 |
|
(1) Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1106/2012 of 27 November 2012 implementing Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries, as regards the update of the nomenclature of countries and territories (OJ L 328, 28.11.2012, p. 7). Code ‘ZZ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.