ISSN 1977-0677 |
||
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 315 |
|
English edition |
Legislation |
Volume 57 |
|
|
|
(1) Text with EEA relevance |
EN |
Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
II Non-legislative acts
REGULATIONS
1.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 315/1 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1170/2014
of 29 October 2014
correcting the Slovenian version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 504/2008 implementing Council Directives 90/426/EEC and 90/427/EEC as regards methods for the identification of equidae
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 2009/156/EC of 30 November 2009 on animal health conditions governing the movement and importation from third countries of equidae (1), and in particular Article 4(4) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 90/427/EEC of 26 June 1990 on the zootechnical and genealogical conditions governing intra-Community trade in equidae (2), and in particular Article 4(2)(c) and (d), the second indent of Article 6(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 8(1) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 94/28/EC of 23 June 1994 laying down the principles relating to the zootechnical and genealogical conditions applicable to imports from third countries of animals, their semen, ova and embryos, and amending Directive 77/504/EEC on pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species (3), and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
In the Slovenian language version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 504/2008 (4) the phrase ‘all types including VEE’ is erroneous and therefore a correction of the Slovenian language version is necessary. The other language versions are not affected. |
(2) |
Regulation (EC) No 504/2008 should therefore be corrected accordingly. |
(3) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and the Standing Committee on Zootechnics, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Concerns only the Slovenian language version.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 October 2014.
For the Commission
The President
José Manuel BARROSO
(1) OJ L 192, 23.7.2010, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 55.
(3) OJ L 178, 12.7.1994, p. 66.
(4) Commission Regulation (EC) No 504/2008 of 6 June 2008 implementing Council Directives 90/426/EEC and 90/427/EEC as regards methods for the identification of equidae (OJ L 149, 7.6.2008, p. 3).
1.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 315/3 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1171/2014
of 31 October 2014
amending and correcting Annexes I, III, VI, IX, XI and XVII to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive) (1), and in particular Article 39(2) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Directive 2007/46/EC establishes a harmonised framework containing the administrative provisions and general technical requirements for new vehicles. Directive 2007/46/EC made the EC whole-vehicle type-approval mandatory for all vehicle categories, including those built in multi stages, in accordance with the timetable set out in its Annex XIX. |
(2) |
It is necessary to supplement the requirements of Annex XVII to Directive 2007/46/EC on the procedure to be followed during multi-stage EC approval to make this procedure fully operational. Annexes I, III and IX of Directive 2007/46/EC need also to be amended to ensure the link between the different stages of construction of a multi-stage built vehicle. |
(3) |
Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2), provided for the repeal of several directives and their replacement by the corresponding United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Regulations. With the repeal of most of those directives by Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 from 1 November 2014, it is appropriate to update the relevant entries in Annex VI to Directive 2007/46/EC. |
(4) |
It is appropriate to correct Annex IX to Directive 2007/46/EC to ensure consistency in the numbering used in the different models of certificate of conformity for the entries concerning the mass in running order and the actual mass. In addition, it is necessary to clarify in Annex XI that head restraint systems are only mandatory for vehicles of category M1. |
(5) |
Directive 2007/46/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. |
(6) |
It is necessary to give sufficient time to manufacturers to adapt their vehicles to the new requirements concerning the multi-stage type-approval procedure and to modify the certificate of conformity, as required by this Regulation. |
(7) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Technical Committee — Motor Vehicles, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
1. Annexes I, III, VI, IX and XI to Directive 2007/46/EC are amended in accordance with Annex I to this Regulation.
2. Annex XVII to Directive 2007/46/EC is replaced by the text in Annex II to this Regulation.
Article 2
Type-approvals of new vehicle types shall be granted in accordance with Directive 2007/46/EC as amended by this Regulation.
Manufacturers shall deliver certificates of conformity in accordance with Directive 2007/46/EC as amended by this Regulation for all new vehicles.
Article 3
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall apply from 1 January 2016. It may apply before this date at the request from manufacturers to the approval authority.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 31 October 2014.
For the Commission
The President
José Manuel BARROSO
(1) OJ L 263, 9.10.2007, p. 1.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefor (OJ L 200, 31.7.2009, p. 1.)
ANNEX I
Directive 2007/46/EC is amended as follows:
(1) |
Annex I is amended as follows:
|
(2) |
Annex III is amended as follows:
|
(3) |
Annex VI is amended as follows:
|
(4) |
Annex IX is amended as follows:
|
(5) |
Annex XI is amended as follows:
|
(1) In accordance with Annex IV to this Directive’
ANNEX II
ANNEX XVII
PROCEDURES TO BE FOLLOWED DURING MULTI-STAGE EC TYPE-APPROVAL
1. OBLIGATIONS OF MANUFACTURERS
1.1. |
The satisfactory operation of the process of multi-stage EC type-approval requires joint action by all the manufacturers concerned. To this end approval authorities must ensure, before granting first and subsequent stage approval, that suitable arrangements exist between the relevant manufacturers for the supply and interchange of documents and information such that the completed vehicle type meets the technical requirements of all the relevant regulatory acts as prescribed in Annex IV or Annex XI. Such information must include details of relevant system, component and separate technical unit approvals and of vehicle parts which form part of the incomplete vehicle but are not yet approved. The manufacturer of the previous stage shall provide information to the manufacturer of the subsequent stage regarding any change that may affect system type-approvals or the whole vehicle type-approval. Such information shall be provided as soon as the new extension to the whole vehicle type has been issued and at the latest on the starting date of production of the incomplete vehicle. |
1.2. |
Each manufacturer in a multi-stage EC type-approval process is responsible for the approval and conformity of production of all systems, components or separate technical units manufactured by him or added by him to the previously built stage. The manufacturer of the subsequent stage is not responsible for subjects which have been approved in an earlier stage except in those cases where he modifies relevant parts to an extent that the previously granted approval becomes invalid. |
1.3. |
The multi-stage procedure may be used by a single manufacturer. However, the multi-stage procedure shall not be used to circumvent the requirements applicable to vehicles built in a single stage. In particular, vehicles approved in this way are not considered to be multi-stage build in the context of paragraph 3.4 of this Annex and Articles 22, 23 and 27 of this Directive (Small series and End of Series limits). |
2. OBLIGATIONS OF TYPE-APPROVAL AUTHORITIES
2.1. |
The type-approval authority shall:
|
2.2. |
The number of vehicles to be inspected for the purposes of paragraph 2.1(d) shall be sufficient to permit the proper control of the various combinations to be EC type-approved according to the state of completion of the vehicle and the following criteria:
|
3. APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS
3.1. |
EC type-approvals in accordance with this Annex are granted on the basis of the current state of completion of the vehicle type and shall incorporate all approvals granted at earlier stages. |
3.2. |
For the whole vehicle type-approval, the legislation (in particular the requirements of Annex II and the particular acts listed in Annex IV and Annex XI to this Directive) shall apply in the same manner as if the approval would be granted (or extended) to the manufacturer of the base vehicle. |
3.2.1 |
If a vehicle system/component type has not been modified, the system/component approval granted in the previous stage remains valid as long as the date for first registration in the particular regulatory act has not been reached. |
3.2.2. |
Where a vehicle system type has been modified at the subsequent stage to the extent that it has to be retested for type-approval purposes, the assessment shall be limited to only those parts of the system which have been modified or affected by the changes. |
3.2.3 |
Where a vehicle system or whole vehicle type has been modified by another manufacturer at the subsequent stage to the extent that, except the manufacturer name, it may still be considered as the same type, the requirement applying to existing types may still be applied as long as the date for first registration in the relevant regulatory act has not been reached. |
3.2.4. |
Where the category of a vehicle is changed, the relevant requirements for the new category shall be fulfilled. The type-approval certificates from the previous category may be accepted provided that the requirements that the vehicle complies with are the same or more stringent than those applying to the new category. |
3.3. |
Subject to the agreement of the approval authority, a whole vehicle type-approval granted to the manufacturer of the subsequent stage needs not to be extended or revised where an extension given at the previous stage vehicle does not affect the subsequent stage or the technical data of the vehicle. However, the type-approval number including the extension of the previous stage(s) vehicle shall be copied in point 0.2.2 of the certificate of conformity of the subsequent stage vehicle. |
3.4. |
Where the cargo area of a complete or completed vehicle of category N or O is modified by another manufacturer for the addition of removable fittings to store and secure the cargo (for example, load space lining, storage racks and roof racks), such items can be treated as part of the pay-mass and an approval is not needed, if both of the following conditions are met:
|
4. IDENTIFICATION OF THE VEHICLE
4.1. |
The identification number of the base vehicle (VIN) prescribed by Regulation (EU) No 19/2011 (1) shall be retained during all the subsequent stages of the type-approval process to ensure the “traceability” of the process. |
4.2. |
At the second and subsequent stages, in addition to the statutory plate prescribed by Regulation (EU) No 19/2011, each manufacturer shall affix to the vehicle an additional plate the model of which is shown in the appendix to this Annex. This plate shall be firmly attached, in a conspicuous and readily accessible position on a part not subject to replacement in use. It shall show clearly and indelibly the following information in the order listed:
Unless otherwise provided for above, the plate shall comply with the requirements of Annex I and Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 19/2011. |
Appendix
MODEL OF THE MANUFACTURER'S ADDITIONAL PLATE
The example below is given as a guide only.
MANUFACTURER'S NAME (stage 3) e2*2007/46*2609 Stage 3 WD9VD58D98D234560 1 500 kg 2 500 kg 1 – 700 kg 2 – 810 kg |
(1) Commission Regulation (EU) No 19/2011 of 11 January 2011 concerning type-approval requirements for the manufacturer's statutory plate and for the vehicle identification number of motor vehicles and their trailers and implementing Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefor (OJ L 8, 12.1.2011, p. 1.)
1.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 315/13 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1172/2014
of 31 October 2014
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),
Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto. |
(2) |
The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 31 October 2014.
For the Commission,
On behalf of the President,
Jerzy PLEWA
Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development
(1) OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.
(2) OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
(EUR/100 kg) |
||
CN code |
Third country code (1) |
Standard import value |
0702 00 00 |
AL |
62,5 |
MA |
74,2 |
|
MK |
57,9 |
|
ZZ |
64,9 |
|
0707 00 05 |
AL |
74,3 |
MK |
80,7 |
|
TR |
126,5 |
|
ZZ |
93,8 |
|
0709 93 10 |
MA |
64,8 |
TR |
135,9 |
|
ZZ |
100,4 |
|
0805 50 10 |
AR |
72,8 |
TR |
89,7 |
|
UY |
29,5 |
|
ZZ |
64,0 |
|
0806 10 10 |
BR |
292,6 |
MD |
36,9 |
|
PE |
376,1 |
|
TR |
147,9 |
|
US |
400,6 |
|
ZZ |
250,8 |
|
0808 10 80 |
BR |
53,2 |
CA |
88,6 |
|
CL |
87,4 |
|
NZ |
145,6 |
|
US |
207,7 |
|
ZA |
169,6 |
|
ZZ |
125,4 |
|
0808 30 90 |
CN |
68,8 |
TR |
99,6 |
|
ZZ |
84,2 |
(1) Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1106/2012 of 27 November 2012 implementing Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries, as regards the update of the nomenclature of countries and territories (OJ L 328, 28.11.2012, p. 7). Code ‘ZZ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
DECISIONS
1.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 315/15 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION
of 30 October 2014
establishing the type, format and frequency of information to be made available by the Member States on integrated emission management techniques applied in mineral oil and gas refineries, pursuant to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
(notified under document C(2014) 7517)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/768/EU)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (1), and in particular Article 72(2) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Commission Implementing Decision 2014/738/EU (2) establishes conclusions on best available techniques (‘BAT conclusions’) for the refining of mineral oil and gas. BAT conclusions 57 and 58 established by that Decision enable Member States to make use of an integrated emission management technique for emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulphur dioxide (SO2) from certain technical units. |
(2) |
Mineral oil and gas refineries are significant sources of emissions of air pollutants, in particular sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. If refineries would use an integrated emission management technique, it would become the main determining factor for the environmental performance of those refineries. |
(3) |
It is necessary to establish specific reporting requirements to allow the Commission to assess the correct application of BAT 57 and BAT 58 and more in particular to verify that the integrated emission management technique is designed, implemented and operated in such a way as to comply with the principles of equivalent environmental outcome as set out in those BAT conclusions. |
(4) |
The type of information to be made available by the Member States in relation to the implementation of integrated emission management techniques described in BAT 57 and BAT 58 should be determined and this should include the description of the significant design features of the techniques implemented, the associated emission limit values established, as well as the associated monitoring system and its results. |
(5) |
Under Article 72(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU, Member States are to make the information on the application of best available techniques available in an electronic format. To ensure the consistency and coherence of the information made available by the Member States, they should use the electronic reporting format developed for that purpose by the Commission as assisted by the European Environment Agency. |
(6) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 75(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Reporting by Member States
1. Member States shall make available to the Commission the information on the implementation of the integrated emission management techniques set out in BAT 57 and BAT 58 adopted by Implementing Decision 2014/738/EU.
The information referred to in the first subparagraph shall be made available in accordance with the Annex and shall cover the years 2017, 2018 and 2019. That information shall be made available for each of the mineral oil and gas refineries where an integrated emission management technique set out in BAT 57 or BAT 58 is implemented for emissions to air of nitrogen oxides (NOx) or sulphur dioxide (SO2).
2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made available to the Commission by 30 September 2020 at the latest using the electronic reporting format provided for that purpose.
Article 2
Addressees
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 30 October 2014.
For the Commission
Janez POTOČNIK
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.
(2) Commission Implementing Decision 2014/738/EU of 9 October 2014 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions, for the refining of mineral oil and gas (OJ L 307, 28.10.2014, p. 38).
ANNEX
Type of information on integrated emission management techniques applied in mineral oil and gas refineries to be made available to the Commission
1. General information
1.1. |
Reference number of the installation: unique installation identifier for the purposes of Directive 2010/75/EU. |
1.2. |
Installation name. |
1.3. |
Operator name. |
1.4. |
Installation address: street, postal code, city and country. |
2. Information on the scope of the integrated emission management techniques and the applicable emission limit values
2.1. |
List and description of combustion and process units covered by the integrated emission management techniques for NOx and SO2, in particular:
|
2.2. |
Applicable emission limit values for NOx and SO2 under the integrated emission management techniques, detailing:
|
3. Information on the monitoring system
3.1. |
Description of the monitoring system used for determining the emissions under the integrated emission management techniques. |
3.2. |
Details on the parameters measured and calculated, the type (direct, indirect) and methods of measurements used, the calculation factors used (and their justification) and the frequency of monitoring. |
4. Information on monitoring results
Overview of the results of monitoring in view of demonstrating that the applicable BAT-AELs set out in BAT 57 and BAT 58 have been complied with and that the resulting emissions are equal to or lower than emissions when applying the applicable BAT-AELs and BAT-AEPLs at a unit-by-unit level, including at least the following:
(a) |
average emission concentration across all units concerned (mg/Nm3, all monthly averages during a year); |
(b) |
total monthly emission across all units concerned (tonnes/month); |
(c) |
average emission concentration for each unit concerned (mg/Nm3, all monthly averages during a year); |
(d) |
flue gas flow rate for each unit concerned (Nm3/hour, all monthly averages during a year). |
1.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 315/19 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION
of 30 October 2014
confirming or amending the average specific emissions of CO2 and specific emissions targets for manufacturers of new light commercial vehicles for the calendar year 2013 pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(notified under document C(2014) 7863)
(Only the Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, and Swedish texts are authentic)
(2014/769/EU)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2011 setting emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles as part of the Union's integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles (1), and in particular Articles 8(6) and 10(1) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
The Commission is required, pursuant to Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011, to confirm or amend each year the average specific emissions of CO2 and the specific emissions target for each manufacturer of light commercial vehicles in the Union. On that basis, the Commission is to determine whether manufacturers and pools of manufacturers formed in accordance with Article 7(1) of that Regulation have complied with their specific emissions targets in accordance with Article 4 of that Regulation. |
(2) |
For the calendar years 2012 and 2013, the specific emissions targets are not binding and the Commission should therefore calculate indicative targets. As those indicative targets will serve as indicators to manufacturers of the effort required to reach the mandatory target in 2014, it is appropriate to determine the average specific emissions of CO2 of manufacturers for 2012 and 2013 in accordance with the requirements set out in the third paragraph of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 and take into account 70 % of the manufacturer's new light commercial vehicles registered in that year. |
(3) |
The detailed data to be used for the calculation of the average specific emissions of CO2 and the specific emissions targets are set out in point 1 of Part A of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 and are based on Member States' registrations of new light commercial vehicles. |
(4) |
Where light commercial vehicles are type-approved in a multi-stage process, point 7 of Part B of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 requires that the manufacturer of the base vehicle take responsibility for the CO2 emissions of the completed vehicle. Pending the applicability from 1 January 2014 of the procedure for determining CO2 emissions from this category of vehicles as provided for in Section 5 of Annex XII to Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 (2), the Commission should calculate the specific emissions target for manufacturers of base vehicles using the mass in running order of the completed vehicle as defined in Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 and should use the specific emissions of CO2 of the base vehicle in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 4 of that Regulation. |
(5) |
The 2013 data from all Member States (except for Croatia) were submitted to the Commission by 28 February 2014 in accordance with Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011. Where, as a result of the verification of the data by the Commission, it was evident that certain data were missing or manifestly incorrect, the Commission contacted the Member States concerned and, subject to the agreement of those Member States, adjusted or completed the data accordingly. Where no agreement could be reached with a Member State, the provisional data of that Member State were not adjusted. |
(6) |
It should be noted that several Member States have not been able to distinguish between complete and completed light commercial vehicles in their current monitoring systems. As a consequence, the 2013 data for light commercial vehicles should be considered incomplete with regard to the monitoring of vehicles type-approved in a multi-stage process. In order to address this issue the monitoring systems both at Union and Member State level are to be adjusted with effect from 1 January 2015. |
(7) |
On 21 May 2014, the Commission published the provisional data on light commercial vehicles and notified 58 manufacturers of the provisional calculations of their average specific emissions of CO2 in 2013 and their specific emissions targets in accordance with Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011. Manufacturers were asked to verify the data and to notify the Commission of any errors within three months of receipt of the notification in accordance with Article 8(5) of that Regulation. 25 manufacturers submitted notifications of errors. |
(8) |
For the 33 manufacturers that did not notify any errors in the datasets, the provisional data and provisional calculations of the average specific emissions of CO2 and the specific emissions targets should be confirmed without adjustments. |
(9) |
The Commission has verified the corrections notified by the manufacturers and the respective justifications and the datasets have been adjusted as appropriate. |
(10) |
In the case of records with missing or incorrect identification parameters, such as type, variant, version code or type-approval number, the fact that manufacturers cannot verify or correct those records should be taken into account. As a consequence, it is appropriate to apply an error margin to the CO2 emissions and mass values in those records. |
(11) |
The error margin should be calculated as the difference between the distances to the specific emissions target expressed as the specific emissions targets subtracted from the average emissions calculated including and excluding those registrations that cannot be verified by the manufacturers. Regardless of whether that difference is positive or negative, the error margin should always improve the manufacturer's position with regard to its specific emission target. |
(12) |
The average specific emissions of CO2 from new light commercial vehicles registered in 2013, the specific emissions targets and the difference between those two values should be confirmed or amended accordingly, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The values relating to the performance of manufacturers, as confirmed or amended for each manufacturer of light commercial vehicles and for each pool of manufacturers of light commercial vehicles in respect of the 2013 calendar year in accordance with Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011, are specified in the Annex to this Decision.
The values referred to in points (a) to (e) of Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 for each manufacturer of light commercial vehicles and for each pool of manufacturers of light commercial vehicles in respect of the 2013 calendar year are also specified in the Annex to this Decision, with the exception provided for in Article 2(4) of that Regulation for the manufacturers concerned.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the following individual manufacturers and pools formed in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011:
(1) |
Alke S.r.l.
|
(2) |
Audi AG
|
(3) |
Automobiles Citroen
|
(4) |
Automobiles Peugeot
|
(5) |
AVTOVAZ JSC Represented in the Union by:
|
(6) |
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
|
(7) |
BMW M GmbH
|
(8) |
Chrysler Group LLC Represented in the Union by:
|
(9) |
Automobile Dacia S.A.
|
(10) |
Daimler AG
|
(11) |
Dongfeng Motor Corporation Represented in the Union by:
|
(12) |
DR Motor Company S.p.A.
|
(13) |
Fiat Group Automobiles S.p.A.
|
(14) |
Ford Motor Company of Australia Ltd Represented in the Union by:
|
(15) |
Ford Motor Company
|
(16) |
Ford-Werke GmbH
|
(17) |
Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd Represented in the Union by:
|
(18) |
Mitsubishi Fuso Truck &Bus Corporation Represented in the Union by:
|
(19) |
GM Korea Company
|
(20) |
GAC Gonow Auto Co., Ltd Represented in the Union by:
|
(21) |
Great Wall Motor Company Ltd Represented in the Union by:
|
(22) |
Hebei Zhongxing Automobile Co., Ltd Represented in the Union by:
|
(23) |
Honda of the UK Manufacturing Ltd
|
(24) |
Hyundai Motor Company Represented in the Union by:
|
(25) |
Hyundai Assan Otomotiv Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. Represented in the Union by:
|
(26) |
Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Czech S.r.o.
|
(27) |
Hyundai Motor India Ltd Represented in the Union by:
|
(28) |
Isuzu Motors Limited Represented in the Union by:
|
(29) |
IVECO S.p.A.
|
(30) |
Jaguar Land Rover Limited
|
(31) |
KIA Motors Corporation Represented in the Union by:
|
(32) |
KIA Motors Slovakia S.r.o.
|
(33) |
LADA Automobile GmbH
|
(34) |
LADA France S.A.S.
|
(35) |
Magyar Suzuki Corporation Ltd
|
(36) |
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd Represented in the Union by:
|
(37) |
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd Represented in the Union by:
|
(38) |
Mazda Motor Corporation Represented in the Union by:
|
(39) |
Mia Electric S.A.S.
|
(40) |
Mitsubishi Motors Corporation MMC Represented in the Union by:
|
(41) |
Mitsubishi Motors Europe B.V. MME
|
(42) |
Mitsubishi Motors Thailand Co., Ltd MMTh Represented in the Union by:
|
(43) |
Nissan International SA Represented in the Union by:
|
(44) |
Adam Opel AG
|
(45) |
Piaggio & C S.p.A.
|
(46) |
Dr. Ing.h.c. F. Porsche AG
|
(47) |
Quattro GmbH
|
(48) |
Renault S.A.S.
|
(49) |
Renault Trucks
|
(50) |
Seat SA
|
(51) |
Skoda Auto AS
|
(52) |
Ssangyong Motor Company Represented in the Union by:
|
(53) |
Suzuki Motor Corporation Represented in the Union by:
|
(54) |
Tata Motors Limited Represented in the Union by:
|
(55) |
Toyota Motor Europe NV/SA
|
(56) |
Toyota Caetano Portugal S.A.
|
(57) |
Volkswagen AG
|
(58) |
Volvo Car Corporation
|
(59) |
Pool for: Ford-Werke GmbH
|
(60) |
Pool for: Mitsubishi Motors
|
It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Done at Brussels, 30 October 2014.
For the Commission
Connie HEDEGAARD
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 145, 31.5.2011, p. 1.
(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 of 18 July 2008 implementing and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information (OJ L 199, 28.7.2008, p. 1).
ANNEX
Table 1
Values relating to the performance of manufacturers referred to in Article 1
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
Manufacturer name |
Pools and derogations |
Number of registrations |
Average CO2 (70 %) corrected |
Specific emissions target |
Distance to target |
Distance to target adjusted |
Average mass |
Average CO2 (100 %) |
ALKE SRL |
|
3 |
0,000 |
176,767 |
– 176,767 |
– 176,767 |
1 725,00 |
0,000 |
AUDI AG |
|
956 |
126,447 |
167,776 |
– 41,329 |
– 41,329 |
1 628,32 |
139,872 |
AUTOMOBILES CITROEN |
|
130 216 |
132,088 |
165,747 |
– 33,659 |
– 33,659 |
1 606,51 |
153,024 |
AUTOMOBILES PEUGEOT |
|
129 301 |
131,800 |
166,577 |
– 34,777 |
– 34,777 |
1 615,43 |
153,742 |
AVTOVAZ JSC |
|
188 |
213,061 |
137,118 |
75,943 |
75,943 |
1 298,67 |
216,681 |
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG |
|
1 400 |
107,298 |
142,422 |
– 35,124 |
– 35,124 |
1 355,70 |
118,907 |
BMW M GMBH |
|
250 |
133,771 |
179,006 |
– 45,235 |
– 45,235 |
1 749,08 |
147,264 |
CHRYSLER GROUP LLC |
|
975 |
203,633 |
210,290 |
– 6,657 |
– 6,657 |
2 085,46 |
214,657 |
AUTOMOBILE DACIA SA |
|
17 056 |
118,698 |
134,724 |
– 16,026 |
– 16,026 |
1 272,93 |
132,385 |
DAIMLER AG |
|
113 930 |
190,454 |
209,487 |
– 19,033 |
– 19,819 |
2 076,83 |
204,616 |
DONGFENG MOTOR CORPORATION |
|
660 |
157,693 |
123,311 |
34,382 |
34,382 |
1 150,20 |
165,639 |
DR MOTOR COMPANY SRL |
DMD |
2 |
163,000 |
|
|
|
1 395,00 |
169,000 |
FIAT GROUP AUTOMOBILES SPA |
|
113 326 |
141,438 |
170,671 |
– 29,233 |
– 29,233 |
1 659,45 |
157,488 |
FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LIMITED |
P1 |
8 306 |
213,047 |
218,129 |
– 5,082 |
– 5,788 |
2 169,75 |
227,220 |
FORD MOTOR COMPANY |
P1 |
231 |
209,820 |
216,776 |
– 6,956 |
– 6,956 |
2 155,20 |
223,377 |
FORD-WERKE GMBH |
P1 |
139 486 |
174,866 |
189,160 |
– 14,294 |
– 14,718 |
1 858,26 |
188,594 |
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD |
DMD |
12 |
151,250 |
|
|
|
1 617,50 |
158,083 |
MITSUBISHI FUSO TRUCK &BUS CORPORATION |
|
509 |
243,728 |
218,545 |
25,183 |
25,183 |
2 174,23 |
252,462 |
GM KOREA COMPANY |
|
190 |
132,797 |
167,210 |
– 34,413 |
– 34,413 |
1 622,24 |
146,321 |
GONOW AUTO CO LTD |
D |
81 |
201,536 |
156,933 |
44,603 |
44,603 |
1 511,73 |
217,111 |
GREAT WALL MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED |
D |
377 |
253,163 |
190,421 |
62,742 |
62,742 |
1 871,82 |
261,883 |
HEBEI ZHONGXING AUTOMOBILE CO LTD |
DMD |
37 |
228,880 |
|
|
|
1 927,24 |
230,541 |
HONDA OF THE UK MANUFACTURING LTD |
|
148 |
150,981 |
173,488 |
– 22,507 |
– 22,507 |
1 689,74 |
159,568 |
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY |
|
1 116 |
194,493 |
209,191 |
– 14,698 |
– 14,721 |
2 073,65 |
199,435 |
HYUNDAI ASSAN OTOMOTIV SANAYI VE |
|
56 |
99,000 |
126,944 |
– 27,944 |
– 27,944 |
1 189,27 |
101,696 |
HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING CZECH SRO |
|
438 |
119,085 |
144,904 |
– 25,819 |
– 25,819 |
1 382,39 |
128,993 |
HYUNDAI MOTOR INDIA LTD |
|
13 |
106,222 |
120,695 |
– 14,473 |
– 14,473 |
1 122,08 |
108,538 |
ISUZU MOTORS LIMITED |
|
9 591 |
194,209 |
208,343 |
– 14,134 |
– 14,211 |
2 064,53 |
203,406 |
IVECO SPA |
|
22 853 |
215,230 |
235,846 |
– 20,616 |
– 20,616 |
2 360,26 |
223,520 |
JAGUAR LAND ROVER LIMITED |
D |
11 351 |
268,105 |
204,771 |
63,334 |
63,304 |
2 026,12 |
276,175 |
KIA MOTORS CORPORATION |
|
618 |
105,928 |
133,172 |
– 27,244 |
– 27,244 |
1 256,24 |
117,519 |
KIA MOTORS SLOVAKIA SRO |
|
195 |
120,110 |
149,191 |
– 29,081 |
– 29,081 |
1 428,48 |
131,487 |
LADA AUTOMOBILE GMBH |
|
24 |
225,000 |
134,817 |
90,183 |
90,183 |
1 273,92 |
225,000 |
LADA FRANCE SAS |
|
17 |
179,000 |
140,634 |
38,366 |
38,366 |
1 336,47 |
181,706 |
MAGYAR SUZUKI CORPORATION LTD |
DMD |
48 |
117,485 |
|
|
|
1 293,85 |
124,208 |
MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD |
DMD |
137 |
214,484 |
|
|
|
2 110,26 |
222,307 |
MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD |
DMD |
4 |
99,000 |
|
|
|
930,00 |
99,000 |
MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION |
DMD |
393 |
156,295 |
|
|
|
1 857,95 |
179,527 |
MIA ELECTRIC SAS |
|
67 |
0,000 |
99,972 |
– 99,972 |
– 99,972 |
899,25 |
0,000 |
MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORPORATION MMC |
P2/D |
7 682 |
201,514 |
192,934 |
8,580 |
8,580 |
1 898,84 |
207,294 |
MITSUBISHI MOTORS EUROPE BV MME |
P2/D |
329 |
228,039 |
208,761 |
19,278 |
19,278 |
2 069,02 |
229,532 |
MITSUBISHI MOTORS THAILAND CO LTD MMTH |
P2/D |
3 332 |
202,931 |
201,498 |
1,433 |
1,433 |
1 990,92 |
206,960 |
NISSAN INTERNATIONAL SA |
|
37 487 |
170,623 |
190,191 |
– 19,568 |
– 19,568 |
1 869,34 |
191,780 |
ADAM OPEL AG |
|
67 369 |
164,033 |
176,676 |
– 12,643 |
– 12,655 |
1 724,02 |
177,764 |
PIAGGIO & C SPA |
D |
2 304 |
110,431 |
116,932 |
– 6,501 |
– 6,501 |
1 081,61 |
142,355 |
DR ING HCF PORSCHE AG |
|
69 |
202,625 |
220,133 |
– 17,508 |
– 17,508 |
2 191,30 |
219,551 |
QUATTRO GMBH |
|
5 |
236,667 |
186,160 |
50,507 |
50,507 |
1 826,00 |
241,600 |
RENAULT SAS |
|
184 708 |
114,165 |
165,846 |
– 51,681 |
– 51,705 |
1 607,57 |
151,657 |
RENAULT TRUCKS |
|
3 845 |
211,847 |
220,438 |
– 8,591 |
– 8,591 |
2 194,58 |
221,365 |
SEAT SA |
|
1 132 |
99,999 |
128,148 |
– 28,149 |
– 28,201 |
1 202,21 |
105,428 |
SKODA AUTO AS |
|
4 591 |
122,491 |
133,043 |
– 10,552 |
– 18,894 |
1 254,85 |
130,964 |
SSANGYONG MOTOR COMPANY |
D |
753 |
199,178 |
209,424 |
– 10,246 |
– 10,246 |
2 076,15 |
205,681 |
SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION |
DMD |
250 |
161,137 |
|
|
|
1 253,50 |
164,052 |
TATA MOTORS LIMITED |
|
260 |
192,176 |
202,295 |
– 10,119 |
– 10,119 |
1 999,49 |
193,438 |
TOYOTA MOTOR EUROPE NV SA |
|
24 281 |
179,208 |
194,259 |
– 15,051 |
– 17,217 |
1 913,09 |
191,346 |
TOYOTA CAETANO PORTUGAL SA |
DMD |
455 |
256,849 |
|
|
|
1 902,27 |
258,701 |
VOLKSWAGEN AG |
|
163 306 |
164,829 |
186,358 |
– 21,529 |
– 21,810 |
1 828,13 |
180,171 |
VOLVO CAR CORPORATION |
|
848 |
161,089 |
204,010 |
– 42,921 |
– 42,921 |
2 017,94 |
177,013 |
Table 2
Values relating to the performance of pools referred to in Article 1
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
Pool name |
Pool |
Number of registrations |
Average CO2 (70 %) corrected |
Specific emissions target |
Distance to target |
Distance to target adjusted |
Average mass |
Average CO2 (100 %) |
FORD-WERKE GMBH |
P1 |
148 023 |
176,693 |
190,829 |
– 14,136 |
– 14,900 |
1 876,2 |
190,816 |
MITSUBISHI MOTORS |
P2 |
11 343 |
201,872 |
195,908 |
5,964 |
5,964 |
1 930,82 |
207,841 |
Explanatory notes to Tables 1 and 2
Column A:
Table 1: ‘Manufacturer name’ means the name of the manufacturer as notified to the Commission by the manufacturer concerned or, where no such notification has taken place, the name registered by the registration authority of the Member State.
Table 2: ‘Pool name’ means the name of the pool declared by the pool manager.
Column B:
‘D’ means that a derogation relating to a small volume manufacturer has been granted in accordance with Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 with effect from the monitoring year 2014, i.e. it is not used for the calculation of the performance in 2013.
‘DMD’ means that a de minimis derogation applies, i.e. a manufacturer which together with all its connected undertakings was responsible for fewer than 1 000 new registered vehicles in 2013 does not have to meet a specific emissions target.
‘P’ means that the manufacturer is a member of a pool (listed in table 2) formed in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 and the pooling agreement is valid for the calendar year 2013.
Column C:
‘Number of registrations’ means the total number of new cars registered by Member States in a calendar year, not counting those registrations that relate to records where the values for mass or CO2 are missing and those records which the manufacturer does not recognise. The number of registrations reported by Member States may otherwise not be changed.
Column D:
‘Average CO2 (70 %) corrected’ means the average specific emissions of CO2 that have been calculated on the basis of the 70 % lowest emitting vehicles in the manufacturer's fleet in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011. Where appropriate, the average specific emissions of CO2 have been adjusted to take into account the corrections notified to the Commission by the manufacturer concerned. The records used for the calculation include those that contain a valid value for mass and CO2 emissions.
Column E:
‘Specific emissions target’ means the emissions target calculated on the basis of the average mass of all vehicles attributed to a manufacturer applying the formula set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011.
Column F:
‘Distance to target’ means the difference between the average specific emissions of CO2 specified in column D and the specific emissions target in column E. Where the value in column F is positive, the average specific emissions of CO2 exceed the specific emissions target.
Column G:
‘Distance to target adjusted’ means that where the values in this column are different from those in column F, the values in that column have been adjusted to take into account an error margin. The error margin is calculated in accordance with the following formula:
Error = absolute value of [(AC1 – TG1) – (AC2 – TG2)]
AC1 |
= |
the average specific emissions of CO2 including the unidentifiable vehicles (as set out in column D); |
TG1 |
= |
the specific emissions target including the unidentifiable vehicles (as set out in column E); |
AC2 |
= |
the average specific emissions of CO2 excluding the unidentifiable vehicles; |
TG2 |
= |
the specific emissions target excluding the unidentifiable vehicles. |
Column I:
‘Average CO2 (100 %)’ means the average specific emissions of CO2 that have been calculated on the basis of 100 % of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. Where appropriate, the average specific emissions of CO2 have been adjusted to take into account the corrections notified to the Commission by the manufacturer concerned. The records used for the calculation include those that contain a valid value for mass and CO2 emissions but do not take into account the super-credits referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011.
1.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 315/30 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION
of 30 October 2014
confirming or amending the average specific emission of CO2 and specific emissions targets for manufacturers of passenger cars for the calendar year 2013 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(notified under document C(2014) 7877)
(Only the Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, and Swedish texts are authentic)
(2014/770/EU)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars as part of the Community's integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 8(5) and Article 10(1) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
The Commission is required, pursuant to Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, to confirm each year the average specific emissions of CO2 and the specific emissions target for each manufacturer of passenger cars in the Union as well as for each pool of manufacturers formed in accordance with Article 7(1) of that Regulation. On the basis of that confirmation, the Commission is to determine whether manufacturers and pools have complied with the requirements of Article 4 of that Regulation. |
(2) |
Pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 the average specific emissions of manufacturers for 2013 are calculated in accordance with the second paragraph of that Article and take into account 75 % of the manufacturer's new cars registered in that year. |
(3) |
The detailed data to be used for the calculation of the average specific emissions and the specific emissions targets is set out in point 1 of Part A and in Part C of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 and is based on Member States' registrations of new passenger cars during the preceding calendar year. |
(4) |
The 2013 data from all Member States (except for Croatia) were submitted to the Commission by 28 February 2014 in accordance with Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009. Where, as a result of the verification of the data by the Commission, it was evident that certain data were missing or manifestly incorrect, the Commission contacted the Member States concerned and, subject to the agreement of those Member States, adjusted or completed the data accordingly. Where no agreement could be reached with a Member State, the provisional data of that Member State was not adjusted. |
(5) |
On 30 April 2014, the Commission published the provisional data and notified 84 manufacturers of the provisional calculations of their average specific emissions of CO2 in 2013 and their specific emissions targets in accordance with Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009. Manufacturers were asked to verify the data and to notify the Commission of any errors within three months of receipt of the notification in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 8(5) of that Regulation and Article 9(3) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1014/2010 (2). Five manufacturers accepted the preliminary data without corrections whilst 42 manufacturers submitted notifications of errors within the given deadline. |
(6) |
For the remaining 37 manufacturers that did not notify any errors in the datasets or respond otherwise, the provisional data and provisional calculations of the average specific emissions and the specific emissions targets should be confirmed without adjustments. |
(7) |
The Commission has verified the corrections notified by the manufacturers and the respective justifications, and the dataset has been adjusted as appropriate. |
(8) |
In the case of records with missing or incorrect identification parameters, such as the type, variant, version code or the type approval number, the fact that manufacturers cannot verify or correct those records should be taken into account. As a consequence, it is appropriate to apply an error margin to the CO2 emissions and mass values of those records. |
(9) |
The error margin should be calculated as the difference between the distances to the specific emissions target expressed as the average emission target subtracted from the specific average emissions calculated including and excluding those registrations that cannot be verified by the manufacturers. Regardless of whether that difference is positive or negative, the error margin should always improve the manufacturer's position with regard to its specific emission target. |
(10) |
In accordance with Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, a manufacturer should be considered as compliant with its specific emission target referred to in Article 4 of that Regulation where the average emissions indicated in this Decision are lower than the specific emissions target, expressed as a negative distance to target. Where the average emissions exceed the specific emissions target, an excess emission premium will be imposed in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, unless the manufacturer concerned benefits from an exemption from that target in accordance with Article 2(4) or Article 11 of that Regulation or is a member of a pool in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 and the pool complies with its specific emissions target. On that basis, two manufacturers should be considered exceeding their specific emission targets for 2013. |
(11) |
The average specific emissions of CO2 from new passenger cars registered in 2013, the specific emissions targets and the difference between those two values should be confirmed accordingly, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The values relating to the performance of manufacturers, as confirmed or amended for each manufacturer of passenger cars and for each pool of such manufacturers in respect of the 2013 calendar year in accordance with Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, are specified in the Annex to this Decision.
The values referred to in points (a) to (e) of Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 for each manufacturer of passenger cars and for each pool of such manufacturers in respect of the 2013 calendar year are also specified in the Annex to this Decision, with the exception provided for in Article 2(4) of that Regulation for the manufacturers concerned.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the following individual manufacturers and pools formed in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009:
(1) |
Alpina Burkard Bovensiepen GmbH & Co.,KG
|
(2) |
Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd
|
(3) |
Audi AG
|
(4) |
Audi Hungaria Motor Kft.
|
(5) |
Automobiles Citroën
|
(6) |
Automobiles Peugeot
|
(7) |
AVTOVAZ JSC Represented in the EU by:
|
(8) |
Bentley Motors Ltd
|
(9) |
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
|
(10) |
BMW M GmbH
|
(11) |
Bugatti Automobiles S.A.S.
|
(12) |
Caterham Cars Ltd
|
(13) |
CECOMP S.p.A.
|
(14) |
Chevrolet Italia S.p.A.
|
(15) |
Chrysler Group LLC Represented in the EU by:
|
(16) |
CNG-Technic GmbH
|
(17) |
Automobile Dacia SA
|
(18) |
Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
|
(19) |
Daimler AG
|
(20) |
Donkervoort Automobielen BV
|
(21) |
DR Motor Company S.p.A.
|
(22) |
Ferrari S.p.A.
|
(23) |
Fiat Group Automobiles S.p.A.
|
(24) |
Fisker Automotive and Technology Group LLC
|
(25) |
Ford Motor Company
|
(26) |
Ford Werke GmbH
|
(27) |
Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd Represented in the EU by:
|
(28) |
General Motors Company
|
(29) |
GM Korea Company
|
(30) |
Great Wall Motor Company Ltd Represented in the EU by:
|
(31) |
Honda Automobile (China) Co., Ltd Represented in the EU by:
|
(32) |
Honda Motor Co., Ltd
|
(33) |
Honda Turkiye A.S. Represented in the EU by:
|
(34) |
Honda of the UK Manufacturing Ltd
|
(35) |
Hyundai Motor Company Represented in the EU by:
|
(36) |
Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Czech S.r.o.
|
(37) |
Hyundai Motor India Ltd Represented in the EU by:
|
(38) |
Hyundai Assan Otomotiv Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. Represented in the EU by:
|
(39) |
Jaguar Land Rover Ltd
|
(40) |
Jiangling Motor Holding Co Ltd Represented in the EU by:
|
(41) |
KIA Motors Corporation
|
(42) |
KIA Motors Slovakia S.r.o.
|
(43) |
KTM-Sportmotorcycle AG
|
(44) |
LADA Automobile GmbH
|
(45) |
LADA France S.A.S.
|
(46) |
Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.
|
(47) |
Lotus Cars Ltd
|
(48) |
Magyar Suzuki Corporation Ltd
|
(49) |
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd Represented in the EU by:
|
(50) |
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd Represented in the EU by:
|
(51) |
Maserati S.p.A.
|
(52) |
Mazda Motor Corporation
|
(53) |
McLaren Automotive Ltd
|
(54) |
Mercedes-AMG GmbH
|
(55) |
MG Motor UK Ltd
|
(56) |
Mia Electric S.A.S.
|
(57) |
Mitsubishi Motors Corporation MMC
|
(58) |
Mitsubishi Motors Europe B.V. MME
|
(59) |
Mitsubishi Motors Thailand Co., Ltd MMTh Represented in the EU by:
|
(60) |
Morgan Motor Co., Ltd
|
(61) |
Nissan International SA
|
(62) |
Adam Opel AG
|
(63) |
PERODUA Manufacturing Represented in the EU by:
|
(64) |
Dr. Ing. h.c.F. Porsche AG
|
(65) |
Perushaan Otomobil Nasional Sdn Bhd. Represented in the EU by:
|
(66) |
Qoros Automotive Co., Ltd
|
(67) |
Quattro GmbH
|
(68) |
Radical Motorsport Ltd
|
(69) |
Renault S.A.S.
|
(70) |
Renault Trucks
|
(71) |
Rolls-Royce Motor Cars Ltd
|
(72) |
Seat S.A.
|
(73) |
Secma S.A.S.
|
(74) |
Skoda Auto A.S.
|
(75) |
Ssangyong Motor Company Represented in the EU by:
|
(76) |
Suzuki Motor Corporation Represented in the EU by:
|
(77) |
Tata Motors Ltd Represented in the EU by:
|
(78) |
Tazzari GL S.p.A.
|
(79) |
Tesla Motors Ltd Represented in the EU by:
|
(80) |
Toyota Motor Europe NV/SA
|
(81) |
Vehicules Electriques Pininfarina Bollore S.A.S.
|
(82) |
Volkswagen AG
|
(83) |
Volvo Car Corporation
|
(84) |
Wiesmann GmbH
|
(85) |
Pool for: BMW Group BMW
|
(86) |
Pool for: Daimler AG
|
(87) |
Pool for: Fiat Group Automobiles S.p.A.
|
(88) |
Pool for: Ford -Werke GmbH
|
(89) |
Pool for: General Motors
|
(90) |
Pool for: Honda Motor Europe Ltd
|
(91) |
Pool for: Mitsubishi Motors
|
(92) |
Pool Renault
|
(93) |
Suzuki Pool
|
(94) |
Pool for: Tata Motors Ltd, Jaguar Cars Ltd, Land Rover
|
(95) |
Pool for: Toyota — Daihatsu Group
|
(96) |
Pool for: VW Group PC
|
It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Done at Brussels, 30 October 2014.
For the Commission
Connie HEDEGAARD
Member of the Commission
(2) Commission Regulation (EU) No 1014/2010 of 10 November 2010 on monitoring and reporting of data on the registration of new passenger cars pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 293, 11.11.2010, p. 15).
ANNEX
Table 1
Values relating to the performance of manufacturers confirmed in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
Manufacturer name |
Pools and derogations |
Number of registrations |
Average CO2 (75 %) corrected |
Specific emissions target |
Distance to target |
Distance to target adjusted |
Average mass |
Average CO2 (100 %) |
ALPINA BURKARD BOVENSIEPEN GMBH E CO KG |
DMD |
444 |
169,820 |
|
|
|
1 876,43 |
183,032 |
ASTON MARTIN LAGONDA LTD |
D |
1 579 |
313,688 |
318,000 |
– 4,312 |
– 4,312 |
1 813,29 |
326,017 |
AUDI AG |
P12 |
650 919 |
121,881 |
138,319 |
– 16,438 |
– 16,438 |
1 554,03 |
133,277 |
AUDI HUNGARIA MOTOR KFT |
P12 |
7 132 |
141,911 |
133,391 |
8,520 |
8,520 |
1 446,20 |
150,909 |
AUTOMOBILES CITROEN |
|
587 504 |
106,856 |
129,275 |
– 22,419 |
– 22,419 |
1 356,14 |
116,461 |
AUTOMOBILES PEUGEOT |
|
723 633 |
105,652 |
128,934 |
– 23,282 |
– 23,282 |
1 348,68 |
115,040 |
AVTOVAZ JSC |
D |
1 295 |
215,429 |
201,000 |
14,429 |
14,429 |
1 277,78 |
217,830 |
BENTLEY MOTORS LTD |
P12 |
1 952 |
288,711 |
181,440 |
107,271 |
107,151 |
2497,60 |
308,795 |
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG |
P1 |
758 080 |
123,541 |
138,592 |
– 15,051 |
– 15,179 |
1 560,00 |
133,866 |
BMW M GMBH |
P1 |
4 307 |
239,855 |
153,566 |
86,289 |
85,498 |
1 887,67 |
253,097 |
BUGATTI AUTOMOBILES SAS |
P12 |
11 |
539,000 |
161,670 |
377,330 |
377,330 |
2 065,00 |
544,182 |
CATERHAM CARS LIMITED |
DMD |
85 |
162,714 |
|
|
|
662,06 |
171,776 |
CECOMP S.P.A. |
|
566 |
0,000 |
123,282 |
– 123,282 |
– 123,282 |
1 225,00 |
0,000 |
CHEVROLET ITALIA SPA |
P5 |
746 |
112,021 |
119,423 |
– 7,402 |
– 7,402 |
1 140,56 |
117,095 |
CHRYSLER GROUP LLC |
P3 |
46 131 |
183,732 |
161,282 |
22,450 |
22,398 |
2 056,51 |
194,511 |
CNG-TECHNIK GMBH |
P4 |
85 |
19,235 |
137,855 |
– 118,620 |
– 118,620 |
1 543,89 |
64,165 |
AUTOMOBILE DACIA SA |
P8 |
289 149 |
119,365 |
122,143 |
– 2,778 |
– 2,779 |
1 200,08 |
126,644 |
DAIHATSU MOTOR CO LTD |
P11 |
487 |
148,923 |
124,189 |
24,734 |
24,734 |
1 244,85 |
156,561 |
DAIMLER AG |
P2 |
661 318 |
119,834 |
139,386 |
– 19,552 |
– 19,570 |
1 577,38 |
136,551 |
DONKERVOORT AUTOMOBIELEN BV |
DMD |
8 |
178,000 |
|
|
|
865,00 |
178,000 |
DR MOTOR COMPANY SRL |
DMD |
424 |
125,075 |
|
|
|
1 202,23 |
134,627 |
FERRARI SPA |
D |
2 049 |
304,561 |
303,000 |
1,561 |
1,561 |
1 722,29 |
323,199 |
FIAT GROUP AUTOMOBILES SPA |
P3 |
646 554 |
110,620 |
119,633 |
– 9,013 |
– 9,026 |
1 145,15 |
116,263 |
FISKER AUTOMOTIVE INC |
|
90 |
47,650 |
181,778 |
– 134,128 |
– 134,128 |
2 505,00 |
49,867 |
FORD MOTOR COMPANY |
P4 |
2 |
194,000 |
164,526 |
29,474 |
29,474 |
2 127,50 |
194,000 |
FORD-WERKE GMBH |
P4 |
891 562 |
111,513 |
128,620 |
– 17,107 |
– 17,109 |
1 341,80 |
121,603 |
FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD |
ND |
26 962 |
151,086 |
164,616 |
– 13,530 |
– 13,530 |
1 564,99 |
159,492 |
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY |
P5 |
2 301 |
82,392 |
149,866 |
– 67,474 |
– 67,474 |
1 806,71 |
194,112 |
GM KOREA COMPANY |
P5 |
135 377 |
124,192 |
131,530 |
– 7,338 |
– 7,338 |
1 405,47 |
135,875 |
GREAT WALL MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED |
DMD |
448 |
164,583 |
|
|
|
1 180,63 |
165,531 |
HONDA AUTOMOBILE CHINA CO LTD |
P6 |
14 183 |
124,104 |
119,617 |
4,487 |
4,487 |
1 144,79 |
125,345 |
HONDA MOTOR CO LTD |
P6 |
61 983 |
122,335 |
130,626 |
– 8,291 |
– 8,291 |
1 385,70 |
133,795 |
HONDA TURKIYE AS |
P6 |
1 743 |
154,271 |
126,797 |
27,474 |
27,474 |
1 301,92 |
155,089 |
HONDA OF THE UK MANUFACTURING LTD |
P6 |
53 052 |
134,040 |
137,886 |
– 3,846 |
– 3,846 |
1 544,57 |
145,122 |
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY |
|
44 551 |
134,693 |
143,242 |
– 8,549 |
– 8,549 |
1 661,77 |
146,184 |
HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING CZECH SRO |
|
220 348 |
130,549 |
132,489 |
– 1,940 |
– 1,940 |
1 426,46 |
138,081 |
HYUNDAI MOTOR INDIA LTD |
|
72 184 |
108,201 |
114,154 |
– 5,953 |
– 5,953 |
1 025,25 |
111,015 |
HYUNDAI ASSAN OTOMOTIV SANAYI VE |
|
62 241 |
110,201 |
117,953 |
– 7,752 |
– 7,752 |
1 108,38 |
112,343 |
JAGUAR LAND ROVER LIMITED |
P10/ND |
131 530 |
164,623 |
178,025 |
– 13,402 |
– 13,402 |
2 049,30 |
181,647 |
JIANGLING MOTOR HOLDING CO LTD |
DMD |
23 |
140,000 |
|
|
|
1 378,48 |
143,652 |
KIA MOTORS CORPORATION |
|
285 334 |
117,620 |
127,633 |
– 10,013 |
– 10,013 |
1 320,21 |
127,981 |
KIA MOTORS SLOVAKIA SRO |
|
53 230 |
131,814 |
132,382 |
– 0,568 |
– 0,568 |
1 424,13 |
140,012 |
KTM-SPORTMOTORCYCLE AG |
DMD |
31 |
187,652 |
|
|
|
896,77 |
189,290 |
LADA AUTOMOBILE GMBH |
DMD |
386 |
225,000 |
|
|
|
1 285,00 |
225,000 |
LADA FRANCE |
P8 |
13 |
179,000 |
129,452 |
49,548 |
49,548 |
1 360,00 |
179,000 |
AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI SPA |
P12 |
404 |
340,558 |
144,718 |
195,840 |
195,840 |
1 694,06 |
349,171 |
LOTUS CARS LIMITED |
D |
491 |
197,899 |
280,000 |
– 82,101 |
– 82,101 |
1 228,42 |
207,505 |
MAGYAR SUZUKI CORPORATION LTD |
P9/ND |
98 295 |
118,793 |
123,114 |
– 4,321 |
– 4,321 |
1 151,00 |
125,554 |
MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD |
DMD |
231 |
181,017 |
|
|
|
1 917,84 |
182,987 |
MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD |
P9/ND |
26 564 |
98,182 |
123,114 |
– 24,932 |
– 24,933 |
932,05 |
99,438 |
MASERATI SPA |
P3 |
1 356 |
266,367 |
158,264 |
108,103 |
105,464 |
1 990,46 |
289,532 |
MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION |
ND |
133 180 |
126,281 |
129,426 |
– 3,145 |
– 3,145 |
1 421,75 |
134,115 |
MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE LIMITED |
D |
185 |
275,920 |
285,000 |
– 9,080 |
– 9,080 |
1 542,06 |
276,703 |
MERCEDES-AMG GMBH |
P2 |
1 930 |
177,115 |
147,147 |
29,968 |
28,048 |
1 747,20 |
212,777 |
MG MOTOR UK LIMITED |
D |
488 |
147,645 |
151,600 |
– 3,955 |
– 3,955 |
1 437,34 |
154,408 |
MIA ELECTRIC SAS |
|
257 |
0,000 |
108,278 |
– 108,278 |
– 108,278 |
896,68 |
0,000 |
MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORPORATION MMC |
P7 |
54 367 |
89,125 |
140,783 |
– 51,658 |
– 51,658 |
1 607,95 |
128,371 |
MITSUBISHI MOTORS EUROPE BV MME |
P7 |
6 648 |
118,295 |
121,228 |
– 2,933 |
– 2,933 |
1 180,06 |
126,313 |
MITSUBISHI MOTORS THAILAND CO LTD MMTH |
P7 |
9 816 |
93,898 |
110,407 |
– 16,509 |
– 16,509 |
943,26 |
97,292 |
MORGAN MOTOR CO LTD |
DMD |
426 |
168,746 |
|
|
|
1 104,34 |
189,455 |
NISSAN INTERNATIONAL SA |
|
411 671 |
115,711 |
131,240 |
– 15,529 |
– 15,529 |
1 399,14 |
130,854 |
ADAM OPEL AG |
P5 |
804 072 |
122,121 |
133,249 |
– 11,128 |
– 11,128 |
1 443,09 |
132,096 |
PERODUA MANUFACTURING SDN BHD |
DMD |
200 |
137,000 |
|
|
|
1 011,84 |
138,180 |
DR ING HCF PORSCHE AG |
P12 |
41 854 |
190,087 |
150,634 |
39,453 |
39,453 |
1 823,52 |
200,960 |
PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD |
D |
3 |
157,000 |
181,000 |
– 24,000 |
– 24,000 |
1 380,00 |
158,333 |
QOROS AUTOMOTIVE CO LTD |
DMD |
12 |
146,000 |
|
|
|
1 485,00 |
146,000 |
QUATTRO GMBH |
P12 |
4 282 |
234,695 |
153,137 |
81,558 |
81,558 |
1 878,27 |
247,434 |
RADICAL MOTOSPORT LTD |
DMD |
4 |
229,000 |
|
|
|
850,00 |
229,000 |
RENAULT SAS |
P8 |
793 038 |
96,384 |
124,965 |
– 28,581 |
– 28,583 |
1 261,83 |
109,981 |
RENAULT TRUCKS |
DMD |
18 |
193,000 |
|
|
|
2 130,56 |
199,056 |
ROLLS-ROYCE MOTOR CARS LTD |
P1 |
420 |
324,203 |
181,767 |
142,436 |
141,929 |
2 504,75 |
330,490 |
SEAT SA |
P12 |
280 310 |
111,316 |
123,574 |
– 12,258 |
– 12,361 |
1 231,39 |
118,771 |
SECMA SAS |
DMD |
39 |
131,000 |
|
|
|
658,00 |
131,000 |
SKODA AUTO AS |
P12 |
480 729 |
115,924 |
125,226 |
– 9,302 |
– 9,332 |
1 267,54 |
124,653 |
SSANGYONG MOTOR COMPANY |
D |
4 937 |
171,485 |
180,000 |
– 8,515 |
– 8,515 |
1 856,76 |
182,062 |
SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION |
P9/ND |
21 742 |
158,668 |
123,114 |
35,554 |
35,501 |
1 337,48 |
166,586 |
TATA MOTORS LIMITED |
P10/ND |
883 |
130,428 |
178,025 |
– 47,597 |
– 47,597 |
1 339,85 |
140,574 |
TAZZARI GL SPA |
DMD |
2 |
0,000 |
|
|
|
735,00 |
0,000 |
TESLA MOTORS LTD |
|
1 671 |
0,000 |
166,426 |
– 166,426 |
– 166,426 |
2 169,07 |
0,000 |
TOYOTA MOTOR EUROPE NV SA |
P11 |
512 761 |
102,194 |
127,386 |
– 25,192 |
– 25,724 |
1 314,81 |
116,431 |
VEHICULES ELECTRIQUES PININFARINA-BOLLORE SAS |
|
72 |
0,000 |
123,282 |
– 123,282 |
– 123,282 |
1 225,00 |
0,000 |
VOLKSWAGEN AG |
P12 |
1 486 188 |
115,735 |
130,442 |
– 14,707 |
– 14,827 |
1 381,67 |
127,279 |
VOLVO CAR CORPORATION |
|
203 065 |
107,012 |
145,012 |
– 38,000 |
– 38,000 |
1 700,48 |
130,764 |
WIESMANN GMBH |
DMD |
37 |
281,815 |
|
|
|
1 440,81 |
286,459 |
Table 2
Values relating to the performance of pools confirmed in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
Pool names |
Pool |
Number of registrations |
Average CO2 (75 %) corrected |
Specific emissions target |
Distance to target |
Distance to target adjusted |
Average mass |
Average CO2 (100 %) |
BMW GROUP |
P1 |
762 807 |
123,685 |
138,700 |
– 15,015 |
– 15,141 |
1 562,37 |
134,648 |
DAIMLER AG |
P2 |
663 248 |
119,873 |
139,409 |
– 19,536 |
– 19,555 |
1 577,88 |
136,773 |
FIAT GROUP AUTOMOBILES SPA |
P3 |
694 041 |
111,31 |
122,477 |
– 11,167 |
– 11,197 |
1 207,38 |
121,803 |
FORD-WERKE GMBH |
P4 |
891 649 |
111,492 |
128,621 |
– 17,129 |
– 17,130 |
1 341,82 |
121,598 |
GENERAL MOTORS |
P5 |
942 497 |
121,937 |
133,032 |
– 11,095 |
– 11,095 |
1 438,34 |
132,778 |
HONDA MOTOR EUROPE LTD |
P6 |
130 961 |
126,154 |
132,324 |
– 6,170 |
– 6,170 |
1 422,85 |
137,752 |
MITSUBISHI MOTORS |
P7 |
70 831 |
89,973 |
134,738 |
– 44,765 |
– 44,765 |
1 475,67 |
123,871 |
POOL RENAULT |
P8 |
1 082 200 |
101,787 |
124,211 |
– 22,424 |
– 22,426 |
1 245,33 |
114,434 |
SUZUKI POOL |
P9/ND |
146 601 |
115,69 |
123,114 |
– 7,424 |
– 7,435 |
1 138,98 |
126,907 |
TATA MOTORS JAGUAR CARS LAND ROVER |
P10/ND |
132 413 |
164,303 |
178,025 |
– 13,722 |
– 13,722 |
2 044,57 |
181,373 |
TOYOTA-DAIHATSU GROUP |
P11 |
513 248 |
102,214 |
127,384 |
– 25,170 |
– 25,703 |
1 314,75 |
116,469 |
VW GROUP PC |
P12 |
2 953 781 |
116,868 |
131,039 |
– 14,171 |
– 14,254 |
1 394,74 |
128,793 |
Explanatory notes to Tables 1 and 2
Column A:
Table 1: ‘Manufacturer name’ means the name of the manufacturer as notified to the Commission by the manufacturer concerned or, where no such notification has taken place, the name registered by the registration authority of the Member State.
Table 2: ‘Pool name’ means the name of the pool declared by the pool manager.
Column B:
‘D’ means that a derogation relating to a small volume manufacturer has been granted in accordance with Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 with effect for the calendar year 2013;
‘ND’ means that a derogation relating to a niche manufacturer has been granted in accordance with Article 11(4) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 with effect for the calendar year 2013;
‘DMD’ means that a de minimis derogation applies, i.e. a manufacturer which together with all its connected undertakings was responsible for fewer than 1 000 new registered vehicles in 2013 does not have to meet a specific emissions target;
‘P’ means that the manufacturer is a member of a pool (listed in table 2) formed in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 and the pooling agreement is valid for calendar year 2013.
Column C:
‘Number of registrations’ means the total number of new cars registered by Member States in a calendar year, not counting those registrations that relate to records where the values for mass and/or CO2 are missing and those records which the manufacturer does not recognise. The number of registrations reported by Member States may otherwise not be changed.
Column D:
‘Average CO2 (75 %) corrected’ means the average specific emissions of CO2 that have been calculated on the basis of the 75 % lowest emitting vehicles in the manufacturer's fleet in accordance with the second indent of the second subparagraph of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 and point 4 of Commission Communication COM(2010) 657 final. Where appropriate, the average specific emissions have been adjusted to take into account the corrections notified to the Commission by the manufacturer concerned. The records used for the calculation includes those that contain a valid value for mass and CO2 emissions.
Column E:
‘Specific emissions target’ means the emissions target calculated on the basis of the average mass of all vehicles attributed to a manufacturer applying the formula set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009.
Column F:
‘Distance to target’ means the difference between the average specific emissions specified in column D and the specific emissions target in column E. Where the value in column F is positive the average specific emissions exceed the specific emissions target.
Column G:
‘Distance to target adjusted’ means that where the values in this column are different from those in column F, the values in that column have been adjusted to take into account an error margin. The error margin only applies if the manufacturer has notified the Commission of records with the error code B as set out in Article 9(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1014/2010. The error margin is calculated in accordance with the following formula:
Error = absolute value of [(AC1 – TG1) – (AC2 – TG2)]
AC1 |
= |
the average specific emissions of CO2 including the unidentifiable vehicles (as set out in column D); |
TG1 |
= |
the specific emissions target including the unidentifiable vehicles (as set out in column E); |
AC2 |
= |
the average specific emissions of CO2 excluding the unidentifiable vehicles; |
TG2 |
= |
the specific emissions target excluding the unidentifiable vehicles. |
Column I:
‘Average CO2 (100 %)’ means the average specific emissions of CO2 that have been calculated on the basis of 100 % of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. Where appropriate, the average specific emissions have been adjusted to take into account the corrections notified to the Commission by the manufacturer concerned. The records used for the calculation includes those that contain a valid value for mass and CO2 emissions but do not take into account the super-credits referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009.
1.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 315/44 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION
of 31 October 2014
on the identification of Universal Business Language version 2.1 for referencing in public procurement
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/771/EU)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European standardisation, amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), and in particular Article 13(1) thereof,
After consulting the European multi-stakeholder platform on ICT standardisation and sectoral experts,
Whereas:
(1) |
Standardisation plays an important role in supporting the Europe 2020 strategy, as set out in the Communication from the Commission entitled ‘Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ (2). Several flagship initiatives of the Europe 2020 strategy underline the importance of voluntary standardisation in product or services markets to assure the compatibility and interoperability between products and services, foster technological development and support innovation. |
(2) |
In the digital society standardisation deliverables become indispensable to ensure the interoperability between devices, applications, data repositories, services and networks. The Communication from the Commission entitled ‘A strategic vision for European standards: moving forward to enhance and accelerate the sustainable growth of the European economy by 2020’ (3) recognises the specificity of information and communication technologies (ICT) standardisation where ICT solutions, applications and services are often developed by global ICT Fora and Consortia that have emerged as leading ICT standards development organisations. |
(3) |
Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 aims at modernising and improving the European standardisation framework. It establishes a system whereby the Commission may decide to identify the most relevant and most widely accepted ICT technical specifications issued by organisations that are not European, international or national standardisation organisations. The possibility to use the full range of ICT technical specifications when procuring hardware, software and information technology services will enable interoperability, will help avoid lock-in for public administrations and will encourage competition in the supply of interoperable ICT solutions. |
(4) |
The ICT technical specifications that may be eligible for referencing in public procurement must comply with the requirements set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. Compliance with those requirements guarantees the public authorities that the ICT technical specifications are established in accordance with the principles of openness, fairness, objectivity and non-discrimination that are recognised by the World Trade organisation (WTO) in the field of standardisation. |
(5) |
The decision to identify the ICT specification is to be adopted after consultation of the European multi-stakeholder platform on ICT standardisation set up by Commission Decision (4) complemented by other forms of consultation of sectoral experts. |
(6) |
On 22 May 2014, the European multi-stakeholder platform on ICT standardisation evaluated Universal Business Language version 2.1 (UBL 2.1) against the requirements set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 and gave a positive advice on its identification for referencing in public procurement. The evaluation of UBL 2.1 was subsequently submitted to consultation of sectoral experts that also gave a positive advice on its identification. |
(7) |
UBL 2.1 developed by the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards is a royalty-free library of standard electronic Extensible Markup Language (XML) business documents. It is designed to plug directly into existing business, legal, auditing, and records management practices, and to operate within a standard business framework such as ISO 15000 (ebXML) to provide a complete, standards-based infrastructure that can extend the benefits of existing Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) systems to businesses of all sizes, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Universal Business Language version 2.1 developed by the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards is eligible for referencing in public procurement.
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Done at Brussels, 31 October 2014.
For the Commission
The President
José Manuel BARROSO
(1) OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 12.
(2) COM(2010) 2020 final of 3 March 2010.
(3) COM(2011) 311 final of 1 June 2011.
(4) Commission Decision of 28 November 2011 setting up the European multi-stakeholder platform on ICT standardisation (OJ C 349, 30.11.2011, p. 4).
ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
1.11.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 315/46 |
DECISION OF THE JOINT CUSTOMS COOPERATION COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA ON COOPERATION AND MUTUAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANCE IN CUSTOMS MATTERS
of 16 May 2014
regarding mutual recognition of the Authorised Economic Operator programme in the European Union and the Measures on Classified Management of Enterprises Program in the People's Republic of China
(2014/772/EU)
THE JOINT CUSTOMS COOPERATION COMMITTEE (hereinafter referred to as ‘the JCCC’),
Having regard to the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the People's Republic of China on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters, signed on 8 December 2004 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the CCMAAA’), and in particular Article 21(2)(c) thereof,
Recognising that the European Union (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Union’) and the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as ‘China’) are committed to strengthening their customs cooperation in accordance with the Strategic Framework for EU-China Customs Cooperation,
Affirming the commitment of the Union and China to facilitate trade and to simplify requirements and formalities in respect of the rapid release and clearance of goods,
Affirming that security and safety, and the facilitation of the international trade supply chain, can be significantly enhanced through mutual recognition of their respective programmes for Authorised Economic Operators (hereinafter referred to as ‘AEO’),
Affirming that the programmes are based on internationally recognised security standards advocated by the SAFE Framework of Standards adopted by the World Customs Organization (hereinafter referred to as ‘the SAFE Framework’),
Considering that the AEO programme in the Union and the Measures on Classified Management of Enterprises Program in China (hereinafter referred to as the Programmes), are security and compliance initiatives and that a joint evaluation has revealed that their qualification standards for security and safety purposes are compatible and lead to equivalent results,
Considering that mutual recognition allows the Union and China to provide facilitative benefits to economic operators who have invested in compliance and supply chain security and have been certified under their respective Programmes,
Considering the need to adopt, for that purpose, practical arrangements pursuant to Article 17(5) of the CCMAAA,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1
Scope
This Decision concerns the following Programmes and entities:
(a) |
the Union AEO Programme, covering the ‘AEO certificate — security and safety’, and the ‘AEO certificate — customs simplifications/security and safety’, as provided for in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 (1), together with Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (2); |
(b) |
the Measures of the General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China on classified management of enterprises Decree (GACC) No 170, as amended by Decree (GACC) No 197, (hereinafter referred to as MCME programme') covering Class AA enterprises; and |
(c) |
Economic operators holding an AEO certificate in the Union, as referred to in point (a), and Enterprises holding class AA status under the MCME in China, as referred to in point (b) (hereinafter referred to as ‘Programme Members’). |
Article 2
Mutual Recognition and Responsibility for Implementation
1. The Programmes of the Union and China shall hereby be mutually recognised to be compatible and equivalent. The corresponding Programme Member statuses granted shall be mutually accepted.
2. The Customs Authorities defined in point (b) of Article 1 of the CCMAAA (hereinafter referred to as ‘Customs Authorities’) shall be responsible for implementation of this Decision. They shall take measures to implement this Decision.
Article 3
Compatibility
1. The Customs Authorities shall maintain consistency between the Programmes. The standards applied to the Programmes shall remain compatible with respect to the following matters:
(a) |
the application process for granting membership; |
(b) |
assessment of applications; and |
(c) |
granting of membership and managing of membership status. |
2. The Customs Authorities shall ensure that the Programmes operate within the context of the SAFE Framework.
Article 4
Benefits
1. Each Customs Authority shall provide comparable benefits to Programme Members under the other Customs Authority's Programme.
The benefits shall include, in particular:
(a) |
taking the status of a Programme Member authorised by the other Customs Authority into account favourably in its risk assessment to reduce inspections or controls and in other security and safety-related measures; |
(b) |
taking the status of a Programme Member authorised by the other Customs Authority into account with a view to treating the Programme Member as a secure and safe partner when assessing the business partners requirements for applicants under its own Programme; |
(c) |
taking the status of a Programme Member authorised by the other Customs Authority into account in ensuring priority treatment, expedited processing, simplified formalities and expedited release of the shipments where the Programme Member is involved; |
(d) |
endeavouring to establish a joint business continuity mechanism to respond to disruptions in trade flows due to increases in security alert levels, border closures and/or natural disasters, hazardous emergencies or other major incidents, where priority cargos related to Programme Members could be facilitated and expedited to the extent possible by the Customs Authorities. |
2. Following the review process referred to in Article 7(2), each Customs Authority may provide further facilitation benefits, including streamlining processes and increasing the predictability of cargo release, to the extent possible, in cooperation with other government authorities.
3. Each Customs Authority shall retain the authority to suspend the benefits provided to Programme Members of the other Customs Authority's Programme under this Decision. Such suspension of benefits by one Customs Authority shall be reasoned and promptly communicated to the other Customs Authority for consultation and proper assessment.
4. Each Customs Authority shall report irregularities involving Programme Members of the other Customs Authority's Programme to the other Customs Authority in order to ensure immediate analysis of the appropriateness of the benefits and status granted by the other Customs Authority.
Article 5
Information Exchange and Communication
1. The Customs Authorities shall enhance their communication in order to implement this Decision effectively. They shall exchange information and foster communication with regard to their Programmes by:
(a) |
providing each other with the details on their Programme Members, subject to paragraph 4; |
(b) |
providing updates on operation and development of their Programmes in a timely manner; |
(c) |
exchanging information regarding supply chain security policy and trends; |
(d) |
ensuring effective inter-agency communication between the European Commission Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union and the General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China to enhance risk management practices with respect to supply chain security on the part of the Programme Members. |
2. Article 17 CCMAAA shall apply to any exchange of information pursuant to this Decision.
3. Information and related data shall be exchanged in a systematic manner by electronic means.
4. Details to be exchanged on the Programme Members shall be limited to:
(a) |
the name of the Programme Member; |
(b) |
the address of the Programme Member; |
(c) |
the status of the Programme Member; |
(d) |
the validation or authorisation date; |
(e) |
suspensions and revocations; |
(f) |
the unique authorisation number (e.g. EORI or AEO numbers); and |
(g) |
other details that may be mutually determined between the Customs Authorities, subject, where applicable, to any necessary safeguards. |
Article 6
Treatment of Data
1. Any information, including any personal data, exchanged pursuant to this Decision shall be obtained, used and processed only by the Customs Authorities and for the sole purpose of implementing this Decision.
2. Any information communicated in whatsoever form pursuant to this Decision shall be of a confidential or restricted nature, depending on the rules applicable in each of the Parties and shall be covered by the obligation of official secrecy.
3. The Customs Authorities shall ensure that the information exchanged is accurate and regularly updated, and that appropriate deletion procedures are in place. In the event that a Customs Authority determines that the information provided under this Decision should be amended, the Customs Authority providing this information shall promptly notify the receiving Customs Authority of such amendments. Once notified of such amendments, the receiving Customs Authority shall promptly record those amendments. Information may not be processed and kept longer than is necessary for the purpose of implementing this Decision.
4. Where information with personal data is exchanged according to Article 4 and 5 of this Decision, the Customs Authorities shall also take appropriate measures to ensure data protection, security, confidentiality and integrity. The Customs Authorities shall ensure in particular that:
(a) |
security safeguards are in place (including electronic safeguards) which control, on a need-to-know basis, access to information obtained from the other Customs Authority under this Decision and that the information is used only for the purposes of this Decision; |
(b) |
information obtained from the other Customs Authority under this Decision is protected from unauthorized access, dissemination, alteration, deletion or destruction, except to the extent appropriate to implement paragraph 3; |
(c) |
information obtained from the other Customs Authorities under this Decision is not transmitted to any other party, to any third country or international body, or to any other public authority of the receiving Party without the prior written consent of the Customs Authority which provided the information. Any information transmitted with prior written consent will be used in accordance with the conditions specified in this Decision and subject to any restrictions laid down by the Authority which provided the information; |
(d) |
information obtained from the other Customs Authority under this Decision is stored at all times in secure electronic and/or paper storage systems. Logs or documentation are kept on all access, as well as processing and use of information obtained from the other Customs Authority. |
5. With respect to any personal data which may be exchanged pursuant to this Decision, a Programme Member may request access to, or rectification, blocking or erasure of any such data relating to him or her that are processed by a Customs Authority. Each Customs Authority shall advise its Programme Members as to how to request access, rectification, blocking or erasure in the first instance. The requested Customs Authority shall correct any inaccurate or incomplete data.
6. With respect to any personal data which may be exchanged pursuant to this Decision, Programme Members shall have the right to effective administrative and judicial redress regardless of their nationality and country of residence. In this context, each Customs Authority shall also inform Programme Members of the options for seeking administrative and judicial redress.
7. At the request of the supplying Customs Authority, the receiving Customs Authority shall update, correct, block, or erase information received under this Decision that is inaccurate or incomplete, or if its collection or further processing contravenes this Decision or the CCMAAA.
8. Each Customs Authority shall notify the other Customs Authority if it becomes aware that material information it has transmitted to the other Customs Authority, or received from the other Customs Authority under this Decision, is inaccurate or unreliable or is subject to significant doubt. Where a Customs Authority determines that information it has received from the other Customs Authority under this Decision is inaccurate, it shall take all measures it deems appropriate to safeguard against erroneous reliance on such information, including supplementation, erasure, or correction of such information.
9. Compliance with the provisions in this Article by each Customs Authority shall be subject to oversight and review by the respective relevant authority. For the Union, those authorities are the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Union Member States' data protection authorities, and for China that authority is the General Administration of China Customs. Those authorities shall have effective powers of oversight, investigation, intervention and review and have power to refer violations of law for legal action, where appropriate. They shall ensure that complaints relating to non-compliance are received, investigated, responded to, and appropriately redressed.
10. The JCCC shall review the processing of personal data under this Decision. Such review shall take place at the request of each Customs Authority, or at at least every two years. Each Customs Authority shall provide the necessary information on measures taken to ensure compliance and provide access to relevant documentation, systems and personnel and stop any processing that appears to be in breach of this Decision.
Article 7
Consultation and Review
1. All issues related to the implementation of this Decision shall be settled by consultations between the Customs Authorities in the framework of the JCCC.
2. The JCCC shall review the implementation of this Decision regularly. The review process may include, in particular:
(a) |
joint verifications to identify strengths and weaknesses in implementing mutual recognition; |
(b) |
exchanges of views on details to be exchanged and benefits, including any future benefit, to be granted to operators in accordance with Article 4(2); |
(c) |
exchanges of views on security provisions such as protocols to be followed during and after a serious security incident (business resumption) or when conditions justify the suspension of mutual recognition; |
(d) |
examination of the suspension of the benefits, as referred to in Article 4(3) of this Decision; |
(e) |
review of the implementation of Article 6 of this Decision. |
Article 8
Effect and Suspension
1. The cooperation under this Decision shall take effect upon signature.
2. Either Customs Authority may suspend cooperation under this Decision at any time by giving at least thirty (30) days written notice thereof.
Done at Beijing, 16 May 2014.
For the EU-China Joint Customs Cooperation Committee
For the European Commission
Algirdas ŠEMETA
For the General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China
YU Guangzhou
(1) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1).
(2) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1).