ISSN 1725-2555 |
||
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346 |
|
English edition |
Legislation |
Volume 49 |
|
|
Acts adopted under Title V of the Treaty on European Union |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
(1) Text with EEA relevance |
EN |
Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
I Acts whose publication is obligatory
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/1 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1814/2006
of 8 December 2006
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in the Annex thereto. |
(2) |
In compliance with the above criteria, the standard import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the Annex to this Regulation, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 December 2006.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 December 2006.
For the Commission
Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development
(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).
ANNEX
to Commission Regulation of 8 December 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
(EUR/100 kg) |
||
CN code |
Third country code (1) |
Standard import value |
0702 00 00 |
052 |
89,7 |
204 |
48,3 |
|
999 |
69,0 |
|
0707 00 05 |
052 |
149,4 |
204 |
74,3 |
|
628 |
167,7 |
|
999 |
130,5 |
|
0709 90 70 |
052 |
151,2 |
204 |
58,8 |
|
999 |
105,0 |
|
0805 10 20 |
388 |
39,2 |
508 |
15,3 |
|
528 |
26,3 |
|
999 |
26,9 |
|
0805 20 10 |
052 |
63,5 |
204 |
66,0 |
|
999 |
64,8 |
|
0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70, 0805 20 90 |
052 |
67,2 |
388 |
111,5 |
|
999 |
89,4 |
|
0805 50 10 |
052 |
50,5 |
528 |
35,5 |
|
999 |
43,0 |
|
0808 10 80 |
388 |
59,7 |
400 |
99,7 |
|
404 |
99,8 |
|
720 |
59,8 |
|
999 |
79,8 |
|
0808 20 50 |
052 |
134,0 |
400 |
117,2 |
|
528 |
106,5 |
|
720 |
51,2 |
|
999 |
102,2 |
(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘999’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/3 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1815/2006
of 8 December 2006
amending the representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1002/2006 for the 2006/2007 marketing year
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 of 30 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 as regards trade with third countries in the sugar sector (2), and in particular of the Article 36,
Whereas:
(1) |
The representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and certain syrups for the 2006/2007 marketing year are fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1002/2006 (3). These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1800/2006 (4). |
(2) |
The data currently available to the Commission indicate that the said amounts should be changed in accordance with the rules and procedures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 951/2006, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The representative prices and additional duties on imports of the products referred to in Article 36 of Regulation (EC) No 951/2006, as fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1002/2006 for the 2006/2007 marketing year are hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 December 2006.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 December 2006.
For the Commission
Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development
(1) OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1585/20065 (OJ L 294, 25.10.2006, p. 19).
(2) OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 24.
(3) OJ L 179, 1.7.2006, p. 36.
(4) OJ L 341, 7.12.2006, p. 29.
ANNEX
Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 1702 90 99 applicable from 9 December 2006
(EUR) |
||
CN code |
Representative price per 100 kg of the product concerned |
Additional duty per 100 kg of the product concerned |
1701 11 10 (1) |
22,45 |
5,08 |
1701 11 90 (1) |
22,45 |
10,31 |
1701 12 10 (1) |
22,45 |
4,89 |
1701 12 90 (1) |
22,45 |
9,88 |
1701 91 00 (2) |
26,42 |
12,02 |
1701 99 10 (2) |
26,42 |
7,50 |
1701 99 90 (2) |
26,42 |
7,50 |
1702 90 99 (3) |
0,26 |
0,39 |
(1) Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.III to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 (OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1).
(2) Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.II to Regulation (EC) No 318/2006.
(3) Fixed per 1 % sucrose content.
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/5 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1816/2006
of 8 December 2006
on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),
Whereas:
(1) |
Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f). |
(2) |
Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007 at 11 500 t. |
(3) |
It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
1. All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 December 2006 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.
2. Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of January 2007 for 5 686,783 t.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 December 2006.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 December 2006.
For the Commission
Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development
(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).
(2) OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1745/2006 (OJ L 329, 25.11.2006, p. 22).
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/6 |
COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2006/128/EC
of 8 December 2006
amending and correcting Directive 95/31/EC laying down specific criteria of purity concerning sweeteners for use in foodstuffs
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/107/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning food additives authorised for use in foodstuffs intended for human consumption (1), and in particular Article 3(3)(a) thereof,
After consulting the Scientific Committee on Food and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA),
Whereas:
(1) |
Directive 94/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1994 on sweeteners for use in foodstuffs (2), lists those substances which may be used as sweeteners in foodstuffs. |
(2) |
Commission Directive 95/31/EC of 5 July 1995 laying down specific criteria of purity concerning sweeteners for use in foodstuffs (3), sets out the purity criteria for the sweeteners listed in Directive 94/35/EC. |
(3) |
It is necessary to adopt specific criteria for E 968 erythritol, a new food additive authorised by Directive 2006/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 amending Directive 95/2/EC on food additives other than colours and sweeteners and Directive 94/35/EC on sweeteners for use in foodstuffs. |
(4) |
A number of language versions of Directive 95/31/EC contain some errors regarding the following substances: E 954 saccharin and its Na, K and Ca salts, E 955 sucralose, E 962 salt of aspartame-acesulfame, E 965 (i) maltitol, E 966 lactitol. Those errors need to be corrected. In addition it is necessary to take into account the specifications and analytical techniques for additives as set out in the Codex Alimentarius as drafted by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). In particular where appropriate, the specific purity criteria have been adapted to reflect the limits for individual heavy metals of interest. For reasons of clarity the whole text concerning those substances should be replaced. |
(5) |
EFSA in its scientific opinion of 19 April 2006 concluded that the composition of maltitol syrup based on a new production method will be similar to that of the existing product and will be in accordance with the existing specification. It is therefore necessary to amend the definition of E 965 (ii) maltitol syrup set out in Directive 95/31/EC for E 965 by including that new production method. |
(6) |
Directive 95/31/EC should therefore be amended and corrected accordingly. |
(7) |
The measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Article 1
The Annex to Directive 95/31/EC is amended and corrected in accordance with the Annex to this Directive.
Article 2
1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 15 February 2008 at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. Member States shall determine how such reference is to be made.
2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Article 3
This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Article 4
This Directive is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 December 2006.
For the Commission
Markos KYPRIANOU
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 40, 11.2.1989, p. 27. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).
(2) OJ L 237, 10.9.1994, p. 3. Directive as last amended by Directive 2006/52/EC (OJ L 204, 26.7.2006, p. 10).
(3) OJ L 178, 28.7.1995, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/46/EC (OJ L 114, 21.4.2004, p. 15).
ANNEX
The Annex to Directive 95/31/EC is amended and corrected as follows:
1. |
The following text concerning E 968 erythritol is inserted after E 967 xylitol:
|
2. |
The text concerning E 954 saccharin and its Na, K and Ca salts is replaced by the following:
|
3. |
The text concerning E 955 sucralose is replaced by the following:
|
4. |
The text concerning E 962 salt of aspartame-acesulfame is replaced by the following:
|
5. |
The text concerning E 965 (i) maltitol is replaced by the following:
|
6. |
The text concerning E 965 (ii) maltitol syrup is replaced by the following:
|
7. |
The text concerning E 966 lactitol is replaced by the following:
|
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/15 |
COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2006/129/EC
of 8 December 2006
amending and correcting Directive 96/77/EC laying down specific purity criteria on food additives other than colours and sweeteners
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/107/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning food additives authorised for use in foodstuffs intended for human consumption (1), and in particular Article 3(3)(a) thereof,
After consulting the Scientific Committee on Food and the European Food Safety Authority,
Whereas:
(1) |
Commission Directive 96/77/EC (2) of 2 December 1996 laying down specific purity criteria on food additives other than colours and sweeteners sets out the purity criteria for the additives mentioned in Directive 95/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 1995 on food additives other than colours and sweeteners (3). |
(2) |
It is appropriate to withdraw the purity criteria for E 216 propyl p-hydroxybenzoate and E 217 sodium propyl p-hydroxybenzoate which are no longer permitted for use as food additives. |
(3) |
A number of language versions of Directive 96/77/EC contain errors regarding the following substances: E 307 alpha-tocopherol, E 315 erythorbic acid, E 415 xanthan gum. Those errors need to be corrected. In addition it is necessary to take into account the specifications and analytical techniques for additives as set out in the Codex Alimentarius as drafted by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). In particular where appropriate, the specific purity criteria have been adapted to reflect the limits for individual heavy metals of interest. For reasons of clarity the whole text concerning those substances should be replaced. |
(4) |
The level of sulphated ash in the purity criteria for E 472c citric acid esters of mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids should be amended in order to cover partially or wholly neutralised products. |
(5) |
It is necessary to ensure that E 559 aluminium silicate is produced from raw kaolinitic clay which is free from unacceptable dioxin contamination. The presence of dioxin in the raw kaolinitic clay should therefore be restricted to the lowest possible level. |
(6) |
It is necessary to adopt specifications for the new food additives authorised through Directive 2006/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 amending Directive 95/2/EC on food additives other than colours and sweeteners and Directive 94/35/EC on sweeteners for use in foodstuffs: E 319 tertiary-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), E 426 soybean hemicellulose, E 462 ethyl cellulose, E 586 4-hexylresorcinol, E 1204 pullulan and E 1452 starch aluminium octenyl succinate. |
(7) |
Directive 96/77/EC should therefore be amended and corrected accordingly. |
(8) |
The measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Article 1
The Annex to Directive 96/77/EC is amended and corrected in accordance with the Annex to this Directive.
Article 2
1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 15 February 2008 at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. Member States shall determine how such reference is to be made.
2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Article 3
This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Article 4
This Directive is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 December 2006.
For the Commission
Markos KYPRIANOU
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 40, 11.2.1989, p. 27. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).
(2) OJ L 339, 30.12.1996, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/45/EC (OJ L 113, 20.4.2004, p. 19).
(3) OJ L 61, 18.3.1995, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 2006/52/EC (OJ L 204, 26.7.2006, p. 10).
ANNEX
The Annex to Directive 96/77/EC is amended and corrected as follows:
1. |
The texts concerning E 216 propyl p-hydroxybenzoate and E 217 sodium propyl p-hydroxybenzoate are deleted. |
2. |
The text concerning E 307 alpha-tocopherol is replaced by the following:
|
3. |
The text concerning E 315 erythorbic acid is replaced by the following:
|
4. |
The following text concerning E 319 tertiary-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) is inserted after E 316 sodium erythorbate:
|
5. |
The text concerning E 415 xanthan gum is replaced by the following:
|
6. |
The following text concerning E 426 soybean hemicellulose is inserted after E 425(ii) konjac glucomannan:
|
7. |
The following text concerning E 462 ethyl cellulose is inserted after E 461 methyl cellulose:
|
8. |
The text concerning E 472c citric acid esters of mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids is replaced by the following:
|
9. |
The text concerning E 559 aluminium silicate (kaolin) is replaced by the following:
|
10. |
The following text concerning E 586 4-hexylresorcinol is inserted after E 578 calcium gluconate:
|
11. |
The following text concerning E 1204 pullulan is inserted after E 1200 polydextrose:
|
12. |
The following text concerning E 1452 starch aluminium octenyl succinate is inserted after E 1451 acetylated oxidised starch:
|
II Acts whose publication is not obligatory
Council
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/26 |
COUNCIL DECISION
of 30 November 2006
establishing the position to be adopted on behalf of the Community within the Food Aid Committee as regards the extension of the Food Aid Convention 1999
(2006/906/EC)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 181 in conjunction with Article 300(2), second subparagraph, thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
Whereas:
(1) |
The Food Aid Convention 1999 (hereinafter the ‘Convention’) was concluded by the Community by Decision 2000/421/EC (1) and extended by decisions of the Food Aid Committee in June 2002, in June 2003 and in June 2005, so as to remain in force until 30 June 2007. |
(2) |
A further one year extension of the Convention is in the interest of both the Community and its Member States. Pursuant to Article XXV(b) of the Convention, that extension is conditional upon the remaining in force, for the same period, of the Grains Trade Convention 1995. The Commission, which represents the Community in the Food Aid Committee, should therefore be authorised by a Council Decision to vote in favour of such extension, |
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Sole Article
The European Community's position within the Food Aid Committee shall be to vote in favour of the extension of the Food Aid Convention 1999 for a further one year period, on the condition that the Grains Trade Convention 1995 remains in force for the same period.
The Commission is hereby authorised to express this position within the Food Aid Committee.
Done at Brussels, 30 November 2006.
For the Council
The President
L. HYSSÄLÄ
(1) OJ L 163, 4.7.2000, p. 37.
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/27 |
COUNCIL DECISION
of 30 November 2006
appointing a Spanish member to the Committee of the Regions
(2006/907/EC)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Spanish Government,
Whereas:
(1) |
On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
(2) |
A seat as member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr Joan CLOS i MATHEU, |
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1
Mr Jordi HEREU i BOHER, Mayor of the city of Barcelona, is hereby appointed member of the Committee of the Regions in place of Mr Joan CLOS i MATHEU for the remainder of his term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010.
Article 2
This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.
Done at Brussels, 30 November 2006.
For the Council
The President
L. HYSSÄLÄ
(1) OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/28 |
COUNCIL DECISION
of 4 December 2006
on the first instalment of the third Community contribution to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development for the Chernobyl Shelter Fund
(2006/908/EC, Euratom)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 308 thereof,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 203 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),
Whereas:
(1) |
The Community, in pursuance of a clear policy of supporting Ukraine in its efforts to eliminate the consequences of the nuclear accident which occurred on 26 April 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, has already contributed EUR 90,5 million over the years 1999 to 2000 to the Chernobyl Shelter Fund, established at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), in accordance with Decision 98/381/EC, Euratom (2) and a further EUR 100 million over the years 2001 to 2005, in accordance with Decision 2001/824/EC, Euratom (3). |
(2) |
The EBRD, as administrator of the Chernobyl Shelter Fund, confirmed to the Fund’s Assembly of Contributors that there was a shortfall of roughly EUR 250 million and that there were not sufficient unallocated funds to allow a contract award for the New Safe Confinement. New commitments were required from the contributors in 2005 to avoid further delays to the project. |
(3) |
The ex-G7 Members and the Community, which have provided most of the contributions to the Chernobyl Shelter Fund, agreed on the principle of further contributions to the Fund according to the historical burden-sharing amongst the contributors. |
(4) |
Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 99/2000 of 29 December 1999 concerning the provision of assistance to partner States in Eastern Europe and Central Asia (4) includes as a priority in the area of nuclear safety the contribution to relevant EU-supported international initiatives such as the G7/EU initiative on the closure of Chernobyl. |
(5) |
In the Communication of 6 September 2000 from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, the Commission proposed that from 2001 Community financial support for nuclear safety in the newly independent States and the countries of central and eastern Europe should be taken from a single budget line for financial assistance to nuclear safety for the newly independent States. |
(6) |
EBRD procurement rules apply to grants made from the resources of the Chernobyl Shelter Fund, on the understanding that procurement should in principle be limited to goods and services produced in or supplied from the countries of the contributors or the countries of EBRD operations. Those rules are not identical to those applied to operations directly financed through the TACIS programme, which cannot consequently cover the contribution which is the subject of this Decision. |
(7) |
It is, however, appropriate to ensure that, with regard to procurement arrangements made pursuant to the EBRD’s Rules of the Chernobyl Shelter Fund, there is no discrimination between individual Member States, irrespective of whether they have concluded individual contribution agreements with the EBRD or not. |
(8) |
It is also appropriate that procurement arrangements with third countries that are not TACIS partner countries be authorised, on a case-by-case basis, in the interest of the projects concerning the Chernobyl Shelter Implementation Plan. |
(9) |
The Treaties do not provide, for the adoption of this Decision, powers other than those of Article 308 of the EC Treaty and Article 203 of the Euratom Treaty, |
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1
The Community shall make a contribution of EUR 14,4 million to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) for the Chernobyl Shelter Fund in 2006.
The appropriation shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspective. The contribution shall be financed against available annual budgetary appropriations.
Article 2
1. The Commission shall administer the contribution to the Chernobyl Shelter Fund in accordance with Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (5), having particular regard to the principles of sound and efficient management.
The Commission shall forward all relevant information to the budgetary authority and the Court of Auditors and shall provide any supplementary information that they may wish to receive, as regards the aspects of the operation of the Chernobyl Shelter Fund that relate to the Community’s contribution.
2. The Commission shall ensure that, with respect to procurement arrangements relating to grants made from the resources of the Chernobyl Shelter Fund, there is no discrimination between the Member States.
The Commission may authorise, on a case-by-case basis, procurement arrangements with third countries that are not TACIS partner countries, in the interest of the projects concerning the Chernobyl Shelter Implementation Plan.
Article 3
In accordance with Section 2.02 of Article II of the Rules of the Chernobyl Shelter Fund, the Community contribution shall be the subject of a formal Contribution Agreement between the Commission and the EBRD.
Article 4
The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council, on a yearly basis, a progress report on the implementation of the Chernobyl Shelter Fund.
Done at Brussels, 4 December 2006.
For the Council
The President
L. LUHTANEN
(1) Opinion delivered on 14 November 2006 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(2) OJ L 171, 17.6.1998, p. 31.
(3) OJ L 308, 27.11.2001, p. 25.
(4) OJ L 12, 18.1.2000, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2112/2005 (OJ L 344, 27.12.2005, p. 23).
(5) OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/30 |
COUNCIL DECISION
of 4 December 2006
on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway concerning adjustments of trade preferences in cheese undertaken on the basis of Article 19 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2006/909/EC)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 thereof, in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 300(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
Whereas:
(1) |
Article 19(1) of the Agreement on the European Economic Area foresees that the contracting parties shall examine any difficulties that might arise in their trade in agricultural products and shall endeavour to seek appropriate solutions. |
(2) |
The Kingdom of Norway and the European Community held bilateral consultations, on the basis of the aforesaid Article 19(1), which were concluded satisfactorily on 7 June 2006, giving rise to an Agreement. |
(3) |
That Agreement, in the form of an Exchange of Letters, should be approved, |
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1
The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway, concerning adjustments of trade preferences in cheese undertaken on the basis of Article 19 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.
The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.
Article 2
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Community.
Done at Brussels, 4 December 2006.
For the Council
The President
L. LUHTANEN
AGREEMENT
in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway concerning adjustments of trade preferences in cheese undertaken on the basis of Article 19 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area
Sir,
I have the honour to refer to the consultations between the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway on adjustments of preferential concessions on cheese, held from 3 May 2006 to 7 June 2006, undertaken on the basis of Article 19(1) of the Agreement on the European Economic Area.
With the aim of improving the bilateral trade conditions for cheese, the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway have agreed to adjust the current respective preferential quotas.
I hereby confirm that the results of the consultations were as follows:
1. |
The Kingdom of Norway will increase the existing annual duty free tariff quota on imports into Norway of cheese originating in the European Community by 500 tonnes. The additional quantity will be allocated to existing importers on a pro rata basis (i.e. 12,5 % increase of existing quotas). The volume of the additional tariff quota will be 250 tonnes in 2006. The additional quota will be opened as soon as possible, and no later than 1 November 2006. |
2. |
The European Community will merge the two existing annual duty free tariff quotas on imports into the European Community of cheese originating in Norway (quota numbers 09.4781 and 09.4782). The European Community will apply its normal provisions relating to the management of this merged tariff quota, under a licensing management system. The European Community will implement this merge as of 1 January 2007, at the start of the second semester (1 January 2007 to 30 June 2007) of the management year of this concession (1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007). Possible underutilisation of the existing cheese quotas during the semester 1 July 2006 to 31 December 2006 will be transferred to the semester 1 January 2007 to 30 June 2007. |
3. |
The rules of origin for the purpose of implementing the adjustments referred to in items 1 and 2 are set out in Annex IV to the Exchange of Letters of 2 May 1992. However, paragraph 2 to Annex IV shall refer to the list in Annex II to Protocol 4 to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, to be applied according to Annex I to the same Protocol, instead of the list in the Appendix referred to in paragraph 2 of Annex IV to the Exchange of Letters of 2 May 1992. |
4. |
The Parties agree to take the necessary steps in order to ensure that tariff quotas will be managed in such a way that imports may take place regularly and that the quantities agreed for import can effectively be imported. |
This Exchange of Letters shall be approved by the Parties in accordance with their own procedures.
I have the honour to confirm that the European Community is in agreement with the content of this letter.
I should be obliged if you would confirm that the Government of the Kingdom of Norway is in agreement with the above.
Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration,
Sir,
I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date which reads as follows:
‘I have the honour to refer to the consultations between the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway on adjustments of preferential concessions on cheese, held from 3 May 2006 to 7 June 2006, undertaken on the basis of Article 19(1) of the Agreement on the European Economic Area.
With the aim of improving the bilateral trade conditions for cheese, the European Community and the Kingdom of Norway have agreed to adjust the current respective preferential quotas.
I hereby confirm that the results of the consultations were as follows:
1. |
The Kingdom of Norway will increase the existing annual duty free tariff quota on imports into Norway of cheese originating in the European Community by 500 tonnes. The additional quantity will be allocated to existing importers on a pro rata basis (i.e. 12,5 % increase of existing quotas). The volume of the additional tariff quota will be 250 tonnes in 2006. The additional quota will be opened as soon as possible, and no later than 1 November 2006. |
2. |
The European Community will merge the two existing annual duty free tariff quotas on imports into the European Community of cheese originating in the Kingdom of Norway (quota numbers 09.4781 and 09.4782). The European Community will apply its normal provisions relating to the management of this merged tariff quota, under a licensing management system. The European Community will implement this merge as of 1 January 2007, at the start of the second semester (1 January 2007 to 30 June 2007) of the management year of this concession (1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007). Possible underutilisation of the existing cheese quotas during the semester 1 July 2006 to 31 December 2006 will be transferred to the semester 1 January 2007 to 30 June 2007. |
3. |
The rules of origin for the purpose of implementing the adjustments referred to in items 1 and 2 are set out in Annex IV to the Exchange of Letters of 2 May 1992. However, paragraph 2 to Annex IV shall refer to the list in Annex II to Protocol 4 to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, to be applied according to Annex I to the same Protocol, instead of the list in the Appendix referred to in paragraph 2 of Annex IV to the Exchange of Letters of 2 May 1992. |
4. |
The Parties agree to take the necessary steps in order to ensure that tariff quotas will be managed in such a way that imports may take place regularly and that the quantities agreed for import can effectively be imported. |
This Exchange of Letters shall be approved by the Parties in accordance with their own procedures.
I have the honour to confirm that the European Community is in agreement with the content of this letter.
I should be obliged if you would confirm that the Government of the Kingdom of Norway is in agreement with the above.’.
I have the honour to confirm that the Government of Norway is in agreement with the content of your letter.
Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration,
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/33 |
COUNCIL DECISION
of 4 December 2006
concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America renewing the cooperation programme in higher education and vocational education and training
(2006/910/EC)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 149 and 150 in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,
Whereas:
(1) |
By its decision of 24 October 2005 the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate with the United States of America an agreement renewing the cooperation programme in higher education and vocational training. |
(2) |
On behalf of the Community, the Commission has negotiated an agreement with the United States of America in accordance with the directives in the Annex to that decision. |
(3) |
The Community and the United States of America expect to obtain mutual benefit from such cooperation, which must, on the Community's side, be complementary to the bilateral programmes between the Member States and the United States of America and provide a European added value. |
(4) |
The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Community on 21 June 2006 subject to its conclusion at a later date. |
(5) |
The Agreement should be approved, |
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1
1. The Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America renewing a programme of cooperation in higher education and vocational education and training is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.
2. The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.
Article 2
The delegation of the European Community to the Joint Committee referred to in Article 6 of the Agreement shall consist of a representative from the Commission assisted by a representative from each Member State.
Article 3
The President of the Council is authorised to designate the person empowered to give the notification provided for in Article 12(1) of the Agreement.
Done at Brussels, 4 December 2006.
For the Council
The President
L. LUHTANEN
AGREEMENT
between the European Community and the United States of America renewing a programme of cooperation in higher education and vocational education and training
THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY,
of the one part, and
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
of the other part,
(hereinafter collectively referred to as the Parties),
NOTING that the Transatlantic Declaration adopted by the European Community and its Member States (hereinafter referred to as the European Community) and the Government of the United States of America (hereinafter referred to as the United States) in November 1990 makes specific reference to strengthening mutual cooperation in various fields which directly affect the present and future well-being of their citizens, such as exchanges and joint projects in education and culture, including academic and youth exchanges;
NOTING that the new Transatlantic Agenda adopted at the EU-US Summit in December 1995 in Madrid refers under Action IV — Building Bridges Across the Atlantic — to the EC/US Agreement establishing a Cooperation Programme in Education and Vocational Training as a potential catalyst for a broad spectrum of innovative cooperative activities of direct benefit to students and teachers and refers to the introduction of new technologies into classrooms, linking educational establishments in the United States with those in the European Union and encouraging the teaching of each other's languages, history and culture;
NOTING that the 1997 ‘Bridging the Atlantic: People to People Links’ Transatlantic Conference underlined the potential for cooperation between the European Community and the United States of America in the field of non-formal education;
NOTING that at the EU-US Summit in June 2005, leaders agreed on an initiative to enhance transatlantic economic integration and growth which identified education cooperation as one of the tools ‘to increase synergies across the Atlantic as we become more knowledge-based economies’ and committed to work to ‘renew and reinforce the US-EU Agreement on Higher Education and Vocational Training, which includes the Fulbright/European Union Programme, to boost education cooperation and transatlantic exchanges between our citizens;’
CONSIDERING that the adoption and the implementation of the 1995 Agreement Between the European Community and the United States of America Establishing a Cooperation Programme in Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training and the 2000 Agreement Between the European Community and the United States Renewing a Programme of Cooperation in Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training give effect to the commitments of the Transatlantic Declaration and constitute examples of highly successful and cost-effective cooperation;
ACKNOWLEDGING the crucial contribution of education and training to the development of human resources capable of participating in the global knowledge-based economy;
RECOGNISING that cooperation in education and vocational training should complement other relevant cooperation initiatives between the European Community and the United States;
ACKNOWLEDGING the importance of ensuring complementarity with relevant initiatives carried out in the field of higher education and vocational training by international organisations active in these fields such as OECD, UNESCO and the Council of Europe;
RECOGNISING that the Parties have a common interest in cooperation in higher education and vocational education and training;
EXPECTING to obtain mutual benefit from cooperative activities in higher education and vocational education and training;
RECOGNISING the need to widen access to the activities supported under this Agreement, in particular those activities in the vocational education and training sector; and
DESIRING to establish a formal basis for continued cooperation in higher education and vocational education and training,
HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1
Purpose
This Agreement renews the 2000 Cooperation Programme in Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training (hereinafter referred to as the Programme), originally established under the 1995 Agreement Between the European Community and the United States of America establishing a Cooperation Programme in Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training.
Article 2
Definitions
For the purpose of this Agreement:
1. |
‘higher education institution’ means any establishment, according to the applicable laws or practices, which offers qualifications or diplomas at the higher education level, whatever such establishment may be called; |
2. |
‘vocational education and training institutions’ means any type of public, semi-public or private body, which, irrespective of the designation given to it, in accordance with the applicable laws and practices, designs or undertakes vocational education or training, further vocational training, refresher vocational training or retraining; and |
3. |
‘students’ means all those persons participating in learning or training courses or programmes which are run by higher education or vocational education and training institutions as defined in this Article. |
Article 3
Objectives
1. The general objectives of the Programme shall be to:
(a) |
promote mutual understanding between the peoples of the European Community and the United States including broader knowledge of their languages, cultures and institutions; and |
(b) |
improve the quality of human resource development in both the European Community and the United States, including the acquisition of skills required to meet the challenges of the global knowledge-based economy. |
2. The specific objectives of the Programme shall be to:
(a) |
enhance collaboration between the European Community and the United States in the domains of higher education and vocational training; |
(b) |
contribute to the development of higher education and vocational training institutions; |
(c) |
contribute to individual participants' personal development for their own sake and as a way to achieve the general objectives of the Programme; and |
(d) |
contribute to transatlantic exchanges between EU and US citizens. |
3. The operational objectives of the Programme shall be to:
(a) |
support collaboration between higher education and vocational training institutions with a view to promoting joint study programmes and mobility; |
(b) |
improve the quality of transatlantic student mobility by promoting transparency, mutual recognition of qualifications and periods of study and training, and, where appropriate, portability of credits; |
(c) |
support collaboration between public and private organisations active in the field of higher education and vocational training with a view to encouraging discussion and exchange of experience on policy issues; and |
(d) |
support transatlantic mobility of professionals with a view to improving mutual understanding of issues relevant to EC/US relations. |
Article 4
Principles
Cooperation under this Agreement shall be guided by the following principles:
1. |
full respect for the responsibilities of the Member States of the European Community and the United States of America and the autonomy of higher education and vocational education and training institutions; |
2. |
mutual benefit from activities undertaken through this Agreement; |
3. |
broad participation across the different Member States of the European Community and the United States of America; and |
4. |
recognition of the full cultural, social, and economic diversity of the European Community and the United States of America. |
Article 5
Programme actions
The Programme shall be pursued by means of the actions described in the Annex, which forms an integral part of this Agreement.
Article 6
Joint Committee
1. A Joint Committee is hereby established. It shall comprise an equal number of representatives from each of the Parties.
2. The functions of the Joint Committee shall be to:
(a) |
review the cooperative activities envisaged under this Agreement; and |
(b) |
provide a biannual report to the Parties on the level, status, and effectiveness of cooperative activities undertaken under this Agreement. |
3. The Joint Committee shall meet every second year or as agreed upon by the Parties, with such meetings being held alternately in the European Community and the United States.
4. Decisions of the Joint Committee shall be reached by consensus. Minutes, comprising a record of the decisions and principal points, shall be taken at each meeting. These Minutes shall be approved by those persons selected from each side to chair jointly the meeting, and shall, together with the biannual report, be made available to appropriate Minister-level officials of each Party.
Article 7
Monitoring and evaluation
The Programme shall be monitored and evaluated as appropriate on a cooperative basis. This shall permit, as necessary, the reorientation of activities in light of any needs or opportunities becoming apparent in the course of its operation.
Article 8
Funding
1. Activities under this Agreement shall be subject to the availability of funds and to the applicable laws and regulations, policies and programmes of the European Community and the United States. Financing will be, to the extent possible, on the basis of an overall matching of funds between the Parties. The Parties shall attempt to offer Programme activities of comparable benefit and scope.
2. Costs incurred by or on behalf of the Joint Committee shall be met by the Party to whom the members are responsible. Costs, other than those of travel and subsistence, which are directly associated with meetings of the Joint Committee, shall be met by the host Party.
Article 9
Entry of personnel
Each Party shall use its best efforts to facilitate entry to and exit from its territory of personnel, students, material and equipment of the other Party engaged in or used in cooperative activities under this Agreement.
Article 10
Other agreements
This Agreement shall not replace or otherwise affect other agreements or activities undertaken in the fields covered between any Member State of the European Community and the United States of America.
Article 11
Territorial application of this Agreement
This Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories in which the Treaty establishing the European Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other hand, to the United States.
Article 12
Entry into force and termination
1. This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date on which the Parties shall have notified each other in writing that their legal requirements for the entry into force of this Agreement have been fulfilled, whichever is the later date. This Agreement replaces the 2000 Agreement Between the European Community and the United States Renewing a Programme of Cooperation in Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training in its entirety.
2. This Agreement shall remain in force for eight years and may be extended or amended by mutual written agreement.
Amendments or extensions shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date on which the Parties shall have notified each other in writing that their requirements for entry into force of the agreement providing for the amendment or extension in question have been fulfilled.
3. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by either Party by providing twelve months' written notice. The expiration or termination of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or duration of any pre-existing arrangements made under it.
Article 13
Done at Vienna this twenty-first day of June 2006, in duplicate in the English, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish languages, all texts being equally authentic. In the event of discrepancies, the English language shall prevail.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, being duly authorised, have signed the present Agreement.
Por la Comunidad Europea
Za Evropské společenství
For Det Europæiske Fællesskab
Für die Europäische Gemeinschaft
Euroopa Ühenduse nimel
Για την Ευρωπαϊκή Κοινότητα
For the European Community
Pour la Communauté européenne
Per la Comunità europea
Eiropas Kopienas vārdā
Europos bendrijos vardu
Az Európai Közösség részéről
Għall-Komunitá Ewropea
Voor de Europese Gemeenschap
W imieniu Wspólnoty Europejskiej
Pela Comunidade Europeia
Za Európske spoločenstvo
Za Evropsko skupnost
Euroopan yhteisön puolesta
För Europeiska gemenskapen
Por los Estados Unidos de América
Za Spojené státy americké
For Amerikas Forenede Stater
Für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika
Ameerika Ühendriikide nimel
Για τις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες της Αμερικής
For the United States of America
Pour les États-Unis d'Amérique
Per gli Stati Uniti d'America
Amerikas Savienoto Valstu vārdā
Jungtinių Amerikos Valstijų vardu
az Amerikai Egyesült Államok részéről
Għall-Istati Uniti ta'l-Amerika
Voor de Verenigde Staten van Amerika
W imieniu Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki
Pelos Estados Unidos da América
Za Spojené štáty americké
Za Združene države Amerike
Amerikan yhdysvaltojen puolesta
På Amerikas förenta staters vägnar
ANNEX
ACTIONS
Action 1 — Joint European Community/United States consortia projects
1. |
The Parties shall provide support to higher education and vocational education and training institutions which form joint EC/US consortia for the purpose of undertaking joint projects in the area of higher education and vocational education and training. |
2. |
Each joint consortium must be formed by a multilateral partnership of EC and US higher education and vocational training institutions. |
3. |
Joint consortia projects should normally involve transatlantic mobility of students in the framework of joint study programmes, with a goal of parity in the flows in each direction, and should foresee adequate language and cultural preparation. |
4. |
Appropriate authorities on each side will jointly agree upon the eligible subject areas for joint EC/US consortia based on priority fields which are key to EC/US cooperation. |
Action 2 — Excellence (follow-up) mobility projects
The Parties may provide financial support for student mobility to joint consortia of higher education and vocational training institutions that have a proven track record of excellence in the implementation of joint projects funded by the Parties.
Action 3 — Policy-oriented measures
The Parties may provide financial support to multilateral projects involving organisations active in the field of higher education and vocational training with a view to enhancing collaboration between the European Community and the United States as regards the development of higher education and vocational training. Policy-oriented measures may include studies, conferences, seminars, working groups, benchmarking exercises and address horizontal higher education and vocational training issues, including recognition of qualifications.
Action 4 — ‘Schuman-Fulbright’ grants
The Parties intend to provide scholarships to highly qualified professionals (including professionals-in-training, who may be engaged in advanced studies at universities and professional schools) who want to undertake studies or training, in areas of specific relevance to the EU/US relationship, which would be jointly identified by the Parties. For the purpose of promoting ‘Schuman-Fulbright’ grants and supporting grantees, the Parties may provide financial support to an organisation that they shall jointly designate.
Action 5 — Alumni association
The Parties may provide financial support to alumni associations involving students who have participated in exchanges supported by the EC/US cooperation programme in higher education and vocational training. Alumni associations may be run by organisations that the Parties shall jointly designate.
PROGRAMME ADMINISTRATION
Administration of these actions shall be implemented by the competent officials of each Party. These tasks may include:
1. |
deciding upon the rules and procedures for the presentation of proposals, including the preparation of a common set of guidelines for applicants; |
2. |
establishing a timetable for publication of calls for proposals, submission and selection of proposals; |
3. |
providing information on the Programme and its implementation; |
4. |
appointing academic advisors and experts; |
5. |
recommending to the appropriate authorities of each Party which projects to finance; |
6. |
providing financial management; and |
7. |
promoting a cooperative approach to programme monitoring and evaluation. |
As a rule, the European Community will provide support for the use of the European Community project partners; the United States will provide support for United States project partners. In providing support, the Parties may have recourse to flat-rate grants, scales of unit costs and/or scholarships.
TECHNICAL SUPPORT MEASURES
Funds may be used for the purchase of services necessary to the implementation of the Programme. In particular, the Parties may have recourse to experts; may organise seminars, colloquia or other meetings likely to facilitate the implementation of the Programme; and may undertake evaluation, information, publication and dissemination activities.
Commission
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/41 |
COMMISSION DECISION
of 5 December 2006
amending Council Directives 64/432/EEC, 90/539/EEC, 92/35/EEC, 92/119/EEC, 93/53/EEC, 95/70/EC, 2000/75/EC, 2001/89/EC, 2002/60/EC and Decision 2001/618/EC as regards lists of national reference laboratories and State institutes
(notified under document number C(2006) 5856)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2006/911/EC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine (1), and in particular Article 8, Article 9 (2), Article 10 (2) and the second subparagraph of Article 16 (1) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs (2), and in particular Article 34 thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 92/35/EEC of 29 April 1992 laying down control rules and measures to combat African horse sickness (3), in particular Article 18 thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 92/119/EEC of 17 December 1992 introducing general Community measures for the control of certain animal diseases and specific measures relating to swine vesicular disease (4), and in particular Article 24 (2) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 93/53/EEC of 24 June 1993 introducing minimum Community measures for the control of certain fish diseases (5), and in particular the second paragraph of Article 18 thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 95/70/EC of 22 December 1995 introducing minimum Community measures for the control of certain diseases affecting bivalve molluscs (6), and in particular the second paragraph of Article 9 thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 2000/75/EC of 20 November 2000 laying down specific provisions for the control and eradication of bluetongue (7), and in particular the second paragraph of Article 19 thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 2001/89/EC of 23 October 2001 on Community measures for the control of classical swine fever (8), and in particular Article 25 (2) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/60/EC of 27 June 2002 laying down specific provisions for the control of African swine fever and amending Directive 92/119/EC as regards Teschen disease and African swine fever (9), and in particular Article 26 (1) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Directive 64/432/EEC sets out a list of State institutes and national reference laboratories responsible for official testing of tuberculins and reagents, a list of national reference laboratories for bovine brucellosis, as well as a list of official institutes responsible for calibrating the standard working antigen of the laboratory against the official EEC standard serum (EI serum) supplied by the State Veterinary Serum Laboratory in Copenhagen, as regards enzootic bovine leucosis. |
(2) |
Directive 90/539/EEC provides for the designation by Member States of national reference laboratories responsible for coordinating diagnostic methods and their use by approved laboratories. The national reference laboratories are listed in that Directive. |
(3) |
Directive 92/35/EEC provides for the designation by Member States of national reference laboratories responsible for coordinating diagnostic methods and their use by approved laboratories. The national reference laboratories are listed in that Directive. |
(4) |
Directive 92/119/EEC provides for the designation by Member States of national laboratories, for each of the diseases referred to in that Directive. The list of national laboratories for swine vesicular disease is set out in that Directive. |
(5) |
Directive 93/53/EEC provides for the designation by Member States of national reference laboratories, for each of the diseases referred to in that Directive. The list of national reference laboratories for fish diseases is set out in that Directive. |
(6) |
Directive 95/70/EC provides for the designation by Member States of national reference laboratories to carry out sampling and testing. The list of national reference laboratories for diseases of bivalve molluscs is set out in that Directive. |
(7) |
Directive 2000/75/EC provides for the designation by Member States of national laboratories responsible for carrying out laboratory tests. Those national laboratories are listed in that Directive. |
(8) |
Directive 2001/89/EC provides that Member States are to ensure that a national laboratory is responsible for coordinating standards and methods of diagnosis. Those national laboratories are listed in that Directive. |
(9) |
Directive 2002/60/EC provides that Member States are to ensure that a national laboratory is responsible for coordinating standards and methods of diagnosis. Those national laboratories are listed in that Directive. |
(10) |
Commission Decision 2001/618/EC of 23 July 2001 on additional guarantees in intra-Community trade of pigs relating to Aujeszky's disease, criteria to provide information on this disease and repealing Decisions 93/24/EEC and 93/244/EEC (10) establishes the list of institutes responsible for checking the quality of the ELISA method in each Member State, and in particular for producing and standardising national reference sera according to the Community reference sera. That list is set out in that Decision. |
(11) |
The competent authorities of almost all Member States submitted requests for updating details concerning national reference laboratories listed in a number of Directives and Decision. In addition, it is appropriate that the national references laboratories and State institutes referred to in those acts are listed in the alphabetic order of the ISO code for each Member State. |
(12) |
In the interests of clarity and consistency of Community legislation, it is appropriate to replace such lists in those Directives and that Decision. |
(13) |
Directives 64/432/EEC, 90/539/EEC, 92/35/EEC, 92/119/EEC, 93/53/EEC, 95/70/EC, 2000/75/EC, 2001/89/EC, 2002/60/EC and Decision 2001/618/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. |
(14) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Directives 64/432/EEC, 90/539/EEC, 92/35/EEC, 92/119/EEC, 93/53/EEC, 95/70/EC, 2000/75/EC, 2001/89/EC, 2002/60/EC and Decision 2001/618/EC are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Article 2
This Decision shall apply from the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 5 December 2006.
For the Commission
Markos KYPRIANOU
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977/64. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 (OJ L 3, 5.1.2005, p. 1).
(2) OJ L 303, 31.10.1990, p. 6. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).
(3) OJ L 157, 10.6.1992, p. 19. Directive as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.
(4) OJ L 62, 15.3.1993, p. 69. Directive as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.
(5) OJ L 175, 19.7.1993, p. 23. Directive as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.
(6) OJ L 332, 30.12.1995, p. 33. Directive as last amended by Commision Decision 2006/775/EC (OJ L 314, 15.11.2006, p. 33).
(7) OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 74. Directive as amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.
(8) OJ L 316, 1.12.2001, p. 5. Directive as amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.
(9) OJ L 192, 20.7.2002, p. 27. Directive as amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.
(10) OJ L 215, 9.8.2001, p. 48. Decision as last amended by Decision 2005/768/EC (OJ L 290, 4.11.2005, p. 27).
ANNEX
Directives 64/432/EEC, 90/539/EEC, 92/35/EEC, 92/119/EEC, 93/53/EEC, 95/70/EC, 2000/75/EC, 2001/89/EC, 2002/60/EC and Decision 2001/618/EC are amended as follows:
1. |
In Annex B to Directive 64/432/EEC, point 4.2 is replaced by the following: ‘4.2. List of State institutes and national reference laboratories
|
2. |
In Annex C to Directive 64/432/EEC, point 4.2 is replaced by the following: ‘4.2. List of national reference laboratories
|
3. |
In Annex D to Directive 64/432/EEC, points A.1 and A.2 in Chapter II are replaced by the following:
|
4. |
In Annex I to Directive 90/539/EEC, point 1 is replaced by the following:
|
5. |
In Annex I to Directive 92/35/EEC, point A is replaced by the following: ‘A. LIST OF NATIONAL LABORATORIES FOR AFRICAN HORSE SICKNESS
|
6. |
In Annex II to Directive 92/119/EEC, point 5 is replaced by the following: ‘5. Diagnostic laboratories
|
7. |
Annex A to Directive 93/53/EEC is replaced by the following: ‘ANNEX A NATIONAL REFERENCE LABORATORIES FOR FISH DISEASES
|
8. |
Annex C to Directive 95/70/EC is replaced by the following: ‘ANNEX C NATIONAL REFERENCE LABORATORIES FOR DISEASES OF BIVALVE MOLLUSCS
|
9. |
In Annex I to Directive 2000/75/EC, point A is replaced by the following: ‘A. LIST OF THE NATIONAL BLUETONGUE LABORATORIES
|
10. |
In Annex III to Directive 2001/89/EC, point 1 is replaced by the following:
|
11. |
In Annex IV to Directive 2002/60/EC, point 1 is replaced by the following:
|
12. |
In Annex III to Decision 2001/618/EC, point (d) of paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
|
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/59 |
COMMISSION DECISION
of 8 December 2006
amending Decisions 2005/723/EC and 2005/873/EC as regards the reallocation of the Community’s financial contribution to certain Member States for their programmes for the eradication and monitoring of animal diseases and for checks aimed at the prevention of zoonoses for 2006
(notified under document number C(2006) 5937)
(2006/912/EC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field (1), and in particular Article 24(5) and (6), and Articles 29 and 32 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Decision 90/424/EEC provides for the possibility of financial participation by the Community towards the programmes of Member States aimed at the eradication and monitoring of animal diseases and for checks aimed at the prevention of zoonoses. |
(2) |
Commission Decision 2005/723/EC of 14 October 2005 on programmes for the eradication and monitoring of animal diseases, of certain TSEs, and for the prevention of zoonoses, which qualify for a Community financial contribution in 2006 (2) sets out the proposed rate and maximum amount of the Community’s financial contribution for each programme submitted by the Member States. |
(3) |
Commission Decision 2005/873/EC of 30 November 2005 approving programmes for the eradication and monitoring of animal diseases, of certain TSEs, and for the prevention of zoonoses presented by the Member States for the year 2006 (3) sets out the maximum amount of the Community’s financial contribution for each programme submitted by the Member States. |
(4) |
The Commission has analysed the reports forwarded by the Member States on the expenditures of those programmes. The results of that analysis show that certain Member States will not utilise their full allocation for 2006 while others will spend in excess of the allocated amount. |
(5) |
The Community’s financial contribution to certain of those programmes therefore needs to be adjusted. It is appropriate to reallocate funding from programmes of Member States, which are not using their full allocation to those that are exceeding it. The reallocation should be based on the most recent information on the expenditure actually incurred by the concerned Member States. |
(6) |
Decisions 2005/723/EC and 2005/873/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. |
(7) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Annexes I to V to Decision 2005/723/EC are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Article 2
Decision 2005/873/EC is amended as follows:
1. |
in Article 1(2)(d), ‘EUR 105 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 0’; |
2. |
in Article 1(2)(f), ‘EUR 600 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 0’; |
3. |
in Article 3(2)(a), ‘EUR 65 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 135 000’; |
4. |
in Article 3(2)(b), ‘EUR 5 000 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 7 000 000’; |
5. |
in Article 3(2)(e), ‘EUR 240 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 370 000’; |
6. |
in Article 4(2)(c), ‘EUR 50 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 90 000’; |
7. |
in Article 4(2)(e), ‘EUR 100 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 400 000’; |
8. |
in Article 5(2)(f), ‘EUR 1 000 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 1 130 000’; |
9. |
in Article 6(2)(a), ‘EUR 2 200 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 4 200 000’; |
10. |
in Article 7(1)(a), ‘EUR 650 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 550 000’; |
11. |
in Article 7(1)(c), ‘EUR 900 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 300 000’; |
12. |
in Article 7(1)(k), ‘EUR 488 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 38 000’; |
13. |
in Article 8(2)(b), ‘EUR 600 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 1 200 000’; |
14. |
in Article 9(2)(a), ‘EUR 160 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 260 000’; |
15. |
in Article 11(2)(h), ‘EUR 25 760 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 26 065 000’; |
16. |
in Article 11(2)(q), ‘EUR 5 515 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 5 550 000’; |
17. |
in Article 11(2)(t), ‘EUR 2 205 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 2 665 000’; |
18. |
in Article 12(2)(h), ‘EUR 300 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 100 000’; |
19. |
in Article 12(2)(p), ‘EUR 685 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 335 000’; |
20. |
in Article 13(2)(g), ‘EUR 12 790 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 4 790 000’; |
21. |
in Article 13(2)(k), ‘EUR 5 215 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 2 815 000’; |
22. |
in Article 13(2)(p), ‘EUR 685 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 500 000’; |
23. |
in Article 13(2)(r), ‘EUR 865 000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 75 000’. |
Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 December 2006.
For the Commission
Markos KYPRIANOU
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 19. Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/782/EC (OJ L 328, 24.11.2006, p. 57).
(2) OJ L 272, 18.10.2005, p. 18. Decision as amended by Decision 2006/645/EC (OJ L 263, 23.9.2006, p. 14).
(3) OJ L 322, 9.12.2005, p. 21. Decision as amended by Decision 2006/645/EC.
ANNEX
Annexes I to V to Decision 2005/723/EC are replaced by the following:
ANNEX I
List of programmes for the eradication and monitoring of animal diseases (Article 1(1))
Rate and maximum amount of the Community financial contribution
Disease |
Member State |
Rate (%) |
Maximum amount (EUR) |
Aujeszkys disease |
Belgium |
50 |
260 000 |
Spain |
50 |
100 000 |
|
Bluetongue |
Spain |
50 |
4 200 000 |
France |
50 |
150 000 |
|
Italy |
50 |
1 000 000 |
|
Portugal |
50 |
1 250 000 |
|
Bovine brucellosis |
Greece |
50 |
300 000 |
Spain |
50 |
6 000 000 |
|
Ireland |
50 |
1 750 000 |
|
Italy |
50 |
2 600 000 |
|
Cyprus |
50 |
300 000 |
|
Poland |
50 |
260 000 |
|
Portugal |
50 |
1 800 000 |
|
United Kingdom (1) |
50 |
1 900 000 |
|
Bovine tuberculosis |
Estonia |
50 |
135 000 |
Spain |
50 |
7 000 000 |
|
Italy |
50 |
1 800 000 |
|
Poland |
50 |
800 000 |
|
Portugal |
50 |
370 000 |
|
Classical swine fever |
Czech Republic |
50 |
35 000 |
Germany |
50 |
1 200 000 |
|
France |
50 |
400 000 |
|
Luxembourg |
50 |
15 000 |
|
Slovenia |
50 |
25 000 |
|
Slovakia |
50 |
400 000 |
|
Enzootic bovine leucosis |
Estonia |
50 |
5 000 |
Italy |
50 |
90 000 |
|
Lithuania |
50 |
100 000 |
|
Latvia |
50 |
200 000 |
|
Portugal |
50 |
400 000 |
|
Ovine and caprine brucellosis (B. melitensis) |
Greece |
50 |
600 000 |
Spain |
50 |
6 500 000 |
|
France |
50 |
150 000 |
|
Italy |
50 |
3 200 000 |
|
Cyprus |
50 |
310 000 |
|
Portugal |
50 |
1 130 000 |
|
Poseidom (2) |
France (3) |
50 |
100 000 |
Rabies |
Austria |
50 |
180 000 |
Czech Republic |
50 |
390 000 |
|
Germany |
50 |
750 000 |
|
Estonia |
50 |
990 000 |
|
France |
50 |
0 |
|
Finland |
50 |
100 000 |
|
Lithuania |
50 |
0 |
|
Latvia |
50 |
650 000 |
|
Poland |
50 |
3 750 000 |
|
Slovenia |
50 |
300 000 |
|
Slovakia |
50 |
400 000 |
|
African swine fever/Classical swine fever |
Italy |
50 |
50 000 |
Total |
54 395 000 |
ANNEX II
List of programmes of checks aimed at the prevention of zoonoses (Article 2(1))
Rate and maximum amount of the Community financial contribution
Zoonosis |
Member State |
Rate (%) |
Maximum amount (EUR) |
Salmonella |
Austria |
50 |
72 000 |
Belgium |
50 |
550 000 |
|
Cyprus |
50 |
69 000 |
|
Denmark |
50 |
155 000 |
|
Germany |
50 |
300 000 |
|
France |
50 |
315 000 |
|
Ireland |
50 |
75 000 |
|
Italy |
50 |
675 000 |
|
Latvia |
50 |
73 000 |
|
Netherlands |
50 |
759 000 |
|
Portugal |
50 |
38 000 |
|
Slovakia |
50 |
232 000 |
|
Total |
3 313 000 |
ANNEX III
List of programmes for the monitoring of TSEs (Article 3(1))
Rate and maximum amount of the Community financial contribution
Disease |
Member State |
Rate rapid tests and discriminatory tests performed % |
Maximum amount (EUR) |
TSEs |
Belgium |
100 |
3 375 000 |
Czech Republic |
100 |
1 640 000 |
|
Denmark |
100 |
2 380 000 |
|
Germany |
100 |
15 155 000 |
|
Estonia |
100 |
285 000 |
|
Greece |
100 |
1 625 000 |
|
Spain |
100 |
9 945 000 |
|
France |
100 |
26 065 000 |
|
Ireland |
100 |
6 695 000 |
|
Italy |
100 |
9 045 000 |
|
Cyprus |
100 |
565 000 |
|
Latvia |
100 |
355 000 |
|
Lithuania |
100 |
770 000 |
|
Luxembourg |
100 |
140 000 |
|
Hungary |
100 |
1 415 000 |
|
Malta |
100 |
35 000 |
|
Netherlands |
100 |
5 550 000 |
|
Austria |
100 |
2 230 000 |
|
Poland |
100 |
3 800 000 |
|
Portugal |
100 |
2 665 000 |
|
Slovenia |
100 |
410 000 |
|
Slovakia |
100 |
845 000 |
|
Finland |
100 |
1 020 000 |
|
Sweden |
100 |
1 440 000 |
|
United Kingdom |
100 |
7 700 000 |
|
Total |
105 150 000 |
ANNEX IV
List of programmes for the eradication of BSE (Article 4(1))
Rate and maximum amount of the Community financial contribution
Disease |
Member State |
Rate |
Maximum amount (EUR) |
BSE |
Belgium |
50 % culling |
150 000 |
Czech Republic |
50 % culling |
750 000 |
|
Denmark |
50 % culling |
100 000 |
|
Germany |
50 % culling |
875 000 |
|
Estonia |
50 % culling |
15 000 |
|
Greece |
50 % culling |
15 000 |
|
Spain |
50 % culling |
1 000 000 |
|
France |
50 % culling |
100 000 |
|
Ireland |
50 % culling |
2 800 000 |
|
Italy |
50 % culling |
200 000 |
|
Cyprus |
50 % culling |
15 000 |
|
Luxembourg |
50 % culling |
100 000 |
|
Netherlands |
50 % culling |
60 000 |
|
Austria |
50 % culling |
15 000 |
|
Poland |
50 % culling |
985 000 |
|
Portugal |
50 % culling |
335 000 |
|
Slovenia |
50 % culling |
25 000 |
|
Slovakia |
50 % culling |
65 000 |
|
Finland |
50 % culling |
25 000 |
|
United Kingdom |
50 % culling |
530 000 |
|
Total |
8 160 000 |
ANNEX V
List of programmes for the eradication of scrapie (Article 5(1))
Rate and amount of the Community financial contribution
Disease |
Member State |
Rate |
Maximum amount (EUR) |
Scrapie |
Belgium |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
100 000 |
Czech Republic |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
105 000 |
|
Denmark |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
5 000 |
|
Germany |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
1 105 000 |
|
Estonia |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
6 000 |
|
Greece |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
1 060 000 |
|
Spain |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
4 790 000 |
|
France |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
4 690 000 |
|
Ireland |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
705 000 |
|
Italy |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
530 000 |
|
Cyprus |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
2 815 000 |
|
Latvia |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
10 000 |
|
Lithuania |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
5 000 |
|
Luxembourg |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
35 000 |
|
Hungary |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
50 000 |
|
Netherlands |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
500 000 |
|
Austria |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
15 000 |
|
Portugal |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
75 000 |
|
Slovenia |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
160 000 |
|
Slovakia |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
250 000 |
|
Finland |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
6 000 |
|
Sweden |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
6 000 |
|
United Kingdom |
50 % culling; 100 % genotyping |
5 740 000 |
|
Total |
22 763 000 |
(1) United Kingdom only as regards Northern Ireland.
(2) Heartwater, babesiosis and anaplasmosis transmitted by vector insects in the French overseas departments.
(3) France only as regards Guadeloupe, Martinique and Réunion.
Acts adopted under Title V of the Treaty on European Union
9.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 346/67 |
COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2006/913/CFSP
of 7 December 2006
amending and extending Joint Action 2004/847/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission in Kinshasa (DRC) regarding the Integrated Police Unit (EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’)
Extension into 2007
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and, in particular Article 14 and Article 25, third subparagraph, thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
On 9 December 2004, the Council adopted Joint Action 2004/847/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission in Kinshasa (DRC) regarding the Integrated Police Unit (EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’) (1). |
(2) |
By Joint Action 2005/822/CFSP of 21 November 2005 (2), the Council amended and extended the mandate of EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’ for a first phase until 30 April 2006. By Joint Action 2006/300/CFSP of 21 April 2006, the Council amended and extended the mandate of EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’ until 31 December 2006 (3), which notably provided for a temporary reinforcement of EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’ during the electoral process in the DRC. |
(3) |
On 30 November 2006, the Council adopted Joint Action 2006/868/CFSP, which extended the temporary reinforcement of EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’ until 31 December 2006. |
(4) |
The overall mandate of EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’ should be adapted and extended for a further period of six months, and the temporary reinforcement should be extended for a further period of three months. |
(5) |
This Joint Action should be revised, if necessary, once the Council has decided on future EU actions in the field of Security Sector Reform in the Democratic Republic of Congo, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:
Article 1
Joint Action 2004/847/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:
1. |
Article 1(3) shall be replaced by the following: ‘3. EUPOL “Kinshasa” shall be temporarily reinforced during the electoral process and in the immediate period thereafter in the Democratic Republic of Congo, in accordance with the provisions set out in Article 3. This reinforcement shall end on 31 March 2007 at the latest.’. |
2. |
Article 3 shall be replaced by the following: ‘Article 3 Mission Statement The European Union shall conduct a police mission in Kinshasa (DRC) in order to monitor, mentor and advise the setting up and the initial running of the IPU in order to ensure that the IPU acts following the training received in the Academy Centre and according to international best practices in this field. These actions shall be focused on the IPU chain of command to enhance the management capability of the IPU and to monitor, mentor and advise the operational Units in the execution of its tasks. EUPOL “Kinshasa” shall continue to monitor, mentor and advise on the development of the IPU, and shall help ensure the proper integration of the IPU in the National Congolese Police (PNC). EUPOL “Kinshasa” shall also strengthen its advising capacity to the Congolese police with a view to facilitating the Security Sector Reform process in the DRC together with EUSEC RD CONGO. For the purposes of the temporary reinforcement of EUPOL “Kinshasa” during the electoral process, EUPOL “Kinshasa” shall establish, as an integral part of EUPOL “Kinshasa” and under the overall security framework for the elections, a police coordination support element in order to ensure an enhanced and coordinated response of the PNC crowd control units in Kinshasa, in case of disturbances during the electoral period, with particular focus on the election of the of the DRC president. The area of responsibility shall be limited to Kinshasa. The police coordination support element, as part of EUPOL “Kinshasa”, shall not have executive powers. For the purpose of the temporary reinforcement of EUPOL “Kinshasa” during the electoral process, EUPOL “Kinshasa” shall be authorised to use dedicated bilateral financial contributions in order to procure additional equipment for PNC crowd control units in Kinshasa.’. |
3. |
Article 4 shall be replaced by the following: ‘Article 4 Structure of the Mission The Mission will be composed of a Headquarter (HQ) and police monitors. The HQ will consist of the office of the Head of the Mission and an administration support branch. All IPU monitors, mentors and advisors, as well as the trainers, will be co-located in the IPU operational base. For the purposes of the temporary reinforcement of EUPOL “Kinshasa” during the electoral process, EUPOL “Kinshasa” will include a dedicated coordination element in charge of the specific tasks assigned to the mission during this period’. |
4. |
In Article 14 subparagraph two shall be replaced by the following: ‘It shall expire on 30 June 2007’. |
Article 2
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mission for the period from 1 January 2007 until 30 June 2007 shall be a maximum amount of EUR 2 075 000.
Article 3
This Joint Action shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
Article 4
This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Done at Brussels, 7 December 2006.
For the Council
The President
E. TUOMIOJA
(1) OJ L 367, 14.12.2004, p. 30. Joint Action as last amended by Joint Action 2006/868/CFSP (OJ L 335, 1.12.2006, p. 50).
(2) OJ L 305, 24.11.2005, p. 44.
(3) OJ L 111, 25.4.2006, p. 12.