ISSN 1977-091X doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.353.eng |
||
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353 |
|
English edition |
Information and Notices |
Volume 54 |
Notice No |
Contents |
page |
|
II Information |
|
|
INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
|
|
European Commission |
|
2011/C 353/01 |
||
2011/C 353/02 |
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6404 — Hochtief Solutions/Ventizz/JV) ( 1 ) |
|
2011/C 353/03 |
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6383 — Cargill/KoroFrance) ( 1 ) |
|
2011/C 353/04 |
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6394 — Gilde/Eismann) ( 1 ) |
|
2011/C 353/05 |
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6361 — ZF/Hansen) ( 1 ) |
|
2011/C 353/06 |
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6423 — Carlyle/H&F/Pharmaceutical Product Development) ( 1 ) |
|
|
IV Notices |
|
|
NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
|
|
European Commission |
|
2011/C 353/07 |
||
2011/C 353/08 |
||
|
NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
|
2011/C 353/09 |
||
|
V Announcements |
|
|
PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
|
|
European Commission |
|
2011/C 353/10 |
||
|
PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
|
|
European Commission |
|
2011/C 353/11 |
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6412 — Evraz/Alrosa/Mining and Metallurgical Company Timir JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure ( 1 ) |
|
|
OTHER ACTS |
|
|
European Commission |
|
2011/C 353/12 |
||
|
|
|
(1) Text with EEA relevance |
EN |
|
II Information
INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES
European Commission
3.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353/1 |
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION
Corresponding values of the thresholds of Directives 2004/17/EC, 2004/18/EC and 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
2011/C 353/01
The corresponding values in the national currencies other than euros of the thresholds of Directives 2004/17/EC (1), 2004/18/EC (2) and 2009/81/EC (3) are the following:
EUR 80 000 |
BGN |
New Bulgarian lev |
156 464 |
CZK |
Czech koruna |
2 004 240 |
|
DKK |
Danish krone |
595 928 |
|
GBP |
Pound sterling |
69 574 |
|
HUF |
Hungarian forint |
21 824 000 |
|
LTL |
Lithuanian litas |
276 224 |
|
LVL |
Latvian lats |
56 648 |
|
PLN |
New Polish zloty |
321 568 |
|
RON |
New Romanian leu |
337 232 |
|
SEK |
Swedish krona |
759 016 |
EUR 130 000 |
BGN |
New Bulgarian lev |
254 254 |
CZK |
Czech koruna |
3 256 890 |
|
DKK |
Danish krone |
968 383 |
|
GBP |
Pound sterling |
113 057 |
|
HUF |
Hungarian forint |
35 464 000 |
|
LTL |
Lithuanian litas |
448 864 |
|
LVL |
Latvian lats |
92 053 |
|
PLN |
New Polish zloty |
522 548 |
|
RON |
New Romanian leu |
548 002 |
|
SEK |
Swedish krona |
1 233 401 |
EUR 200 000 |
BGN |
New Bulgarian lev |
391 160 |
CZK |
Czech koruna |
5 010 600 |
|
DKK |
Danish krone |
1 489 820 |
|
GBP |
Pound sterling |
173 934 |
|
HUF |
Hungarian forint |
54 560 000 |
|
LTL |
Lithuanian litas |
690 560 |
|
LVL |
Latvian lats |
141 620 |
|
PLN |
New Polish zloty |
803 920 |
|
RON |
New Romanian leu |
843 080 |
|
SEK |
Swedish krona |
1 897 540 |
EUR 400 000 |
BGN |
New Bulgarian lev |
782 320 |
CZK |
Czech koruna |
10 021 200 |
|
DKK |
Danish krone |
2 979 640 |
|
GBP |
Pound sterling |
347 868 |
|
HUF |
Hungarian forint |
109 120 000 |
|
LTL |
Lithuanian litas |
1 381 120 |
|
LVL |
Latvian lats |
283 240 |
|
PLN |
New Polish zloty |
1 607 840 |
|
RON |
New Romanian leu |
1 686 160 |
|
SEK |
Swedish krona |
3 795 080 |
EUR 1 000 000 |
BGN |
New Bulgarian lev |
1 955 800 |
CZK |
Czech koruna |
25 053 000 |
|
DKK |
Danish krone |
7 449 100 |
|
GBP |
Pound sterling |
869 670 |
|
HUF |
Hungarian forint |
272 800 000 |
|
LTL |
Lithuanian litas |
3 452 800 |
|
LVL |
Latvian lats |
708 100 |
|
PLN |
New Polish zloty |
4 019 600 |
|
RON |
New Romanian leu |
4 215 400 |
|
SEK |
Swedish krona |
9 487 700 |
EUR 5 000 000 |
BGN |
New Bulgarian lev |
9 779 000 |
CZK |
Czech koruna |
125 265 000 |
|
DKK |
Danish krone |
37 245 500 |
|
GBP |
Pound sterling |
4 348 350 |
|
HUF |
Hungarian forint |
1 364 000 000 |
|
LTL |
Lithuanian litas |
17 264 000 |
|
LVL |
Latvian lats |
3 540 500 |
|
PLN |
New Polish zloty |
20 098 000 |
|
RON |
New Romanian leu |
21 077 000 |
|
SEK |
Swedish krona |
47 438 500 |
(1) OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 114.
(3) OJ L 216, 20.8.2009, p. 76.
3.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353/4 |
Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6404 — Hochtief Solutions/Ventizz/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 353/02
On 24 November 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:
— |
in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
— |
in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6404. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
3.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353/4 |
Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6383 — Cargill/KoroFrance)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 353/03
On 16 November 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:
— |
in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
— |
in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6383. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
3.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353/5 |
Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6394 — Gilde/Eismann)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 353/04
On 28 November 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:
— |
in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
— |
in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6394. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
3.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353/5 |
Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6361 — ZF/Hansen)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 353/05
On 30 September 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:
— |
in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
— |
in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6361. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
3.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353/6 |
Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6423 — Carlyle/H&F/Pharmaceutical Product Development)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 353/06
On 25 November 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:
— |
in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
— |
in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6423. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
IV Notices
NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES
European Commission
3.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353/7 |
Euro exchange rates (1)
2 December 2011
2011/C 353/07
1 euro =
|
Currency |
Exchange rate |
USD |
US dollar |
1,3511 |
JPY |
Japanese yen |
105,25 |
DKK |
Danish krone |
7,4332 |
GBP |
Pound sterling |
0,86020 |
SEK |
Swedish krona |
9,0834 |
CHF |
Swiss franc |
1,2343 |
ISK |
Iceland króna |
|
NOK |
Norwegian krone |
7,7660 |
BGN |
Bulgarian lev |
1,9558 |
CZK |
Czech koruna |
25,202 |
HUF |
Hungarian forint |
301,69 |
LTL |
Lithuanian litas |
3,4528 |
LVL |
Latvian lats |
0,6978 |
PLN |
Polish zloty |
4,4726 |
RON |
Romanian leu |
4,3578 |
TRY |
Turkish lira |
2,4567 |
AUD |
Australian dollar |
1,3135 |
CAD |
Canadian dollar |
1,3695 |
HKD |
Hong Kong dollar |
10,4958 |
NZD |
New Zealand dollar |
1,7296 |
SGD |
Singapore dollar |
1,7302 |
KRW |
South Korean won |
1 526,66 |
ZAR |
South African rand |
10,8346 |
CNY |
Chinese yuan renminbi |
8,5702 |
HRK |
Croatian kuna |
7,5145 |
IDR |
Indonesian rupiah |
12 167,30 |
MYR |
Malaysian ringgit |
4,2276 |
PHP |
Philippine peso |
58,293 |
RUB |
Russian rouble |
41,4960 |
THB |
Thai baht |
41,600 |
BRL |
Brazilian real |
2,4122 |
MXN |
Mexican peso |
18,2410 |
INR |
Indian rupee |
69,0480 |
(1) Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
3.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353/8 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION
of 2 December 2011
amending Commission Decision 2011/C 69/01 concerning the adoption of a financing decision for 2011 in the framework of the second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008-13) and on the selection, award and other criteria for financial contributions to the actions to this programme
2011/C 353/08
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Decision No 1350/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 establishing a second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008-13) (1), and in particular Article 8(1) thereof,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (2) (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Financial Regulation’), and in particular Article 75 thereof,
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (3) (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Implementing Rules’), and in particular Article 90 thereof,
Having regard to Commission Decision 2004/858/EC of 15 December 2004 setting up an executive agency, the ‘Executive Agency for the Public Health Programme’, for the management of Community action in the field of public health — pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 (4), and in particular Article 6 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Commission Decision 2011/C 69/01 (5) was adopted on 22 February 2011. |
(2) |
A number of calls for tenders initially planned generated savings or were not successful and will not be implemented in 2011. Therefore it is necessary to modify the budget distribution among the different financing mechanisms indicated in point 2 of Annex I to Decision 2011/C 69/01 to allow for financing of a larger number of project grants. |
(3) |
The variations in the budget initially allocated to the specific actions exceed the 20 % indicated in Article 5 of Decision 2011/C 69/01 and therefore constitute a substantial change of the financing decision adopted necessitating its amendment. The financial flexibility of 20 % should apply to the different financing mechanisms. |
(4) |
This Decision is also a financing decision for the Presidency conference to be held in the first half of 2012 under the Danish Presidency mentioned in Annex I point 2.4.1 of Decision 2011/C 69/01. |
(5) |
Decision 2011/C 69/01 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
(6) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee referred to in Article 10 of the Programme Decision, |
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Sole Article
Decision 2011/C 69/01 is amended as follows:
1. |
The first paragraph of Article 5 is replaced by the following: Cumulative changes of allocations to specific financial mechanisms included in Annex I not exceeding 20 % of the maximum contribution authorised by this Decision for each budgetary line are not considered as substantial provided that they do not significantly affect the nature and objective of the work plan. This may include the increase of the maximum contribution authorised by this Decision up to 20 %. |
2. |
Annex I to Decision 2011/C 69/01 is amended as follows:
|
Done at Brussels, 2 December 2011.
For the Commission
John DALLI
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 301, 20.11.2007, p. 3.
(2) OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 1.
(4) OJ L 369, 16.12.2004, p. 73.
(5) http://ec.europa.eu/health/programme/docs/wp2011_en.pdf
NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES
3.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353/10 |
International call for proposals No D1/20472/5.9.2011 for participation in the non-exclusive seismic survey off the coasts of western and southern Greece
2011/C 353/09
1. SUBJECT
The Ministry of the Environment, Energy and Climate Change (hereinafter referred to as ‘the MINISTRY’) intends to evaluate the hydrocarbon potential and further promote certain offshore areas for hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation off the coasts of western and southern Greece.
The MINISTRY, based in Athens, Greece, is launching a call for participation in a non-exclusive seismic survey. The scope of the work is described in point 2 below.
The MINISTRY intends to conclude a contract with the selected company(ies) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the COMPANY’) to perform the said survey.
This public invitation is subject to the provisions of Law No 2289/1995 (Government Gazette I 27 of 8.2.1995) regarding the prospection, exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons and other provisions, as amended by Law No 4001/2011 (Government Gazette I 179 of 22.8.2011) concerning the operation of the electricity and gas energy markets for the exploration, production and transmission networks of hydrocarbons and other provisions.
2. SCOPE OF THE SURVEY
The objective of the planned seismic survey is to acquire, process and interpret data, including the reprocessing and interpretation of existing data, in accordance with the most up-to-date standards in the oil and gas industry. These data will assist in the evaluation of the hydrocarbon potential of the area shown in Appendix A and in the promotion of a subsequent international licensing round for hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation, which is planned for 2012.
The Ministry’s staff will work closely with the COMPANY’s specialists in the planning of the survey, the selection of data acquisition and processing parameters and the interpretation/evaluation of all available data. The MINISTRY has the right to oversee all stages of the project.
3. ELIGIBILITY — CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL FILE — SUBMISSION OF APPLICATIONS
3.1. |
Participation is open, on equal terms, to those companies which meet the legal, financial and technical requirements set out in the call for proposals and which demonstrate the requisite professional competence and experience. |
3.2. |
The application file must include:
The file must also include documents concerning the COMPANY’s capacity, in particular:
|
3.3. |
The file must be submitted in a sealed envelope, clearly labelled on the outside as follows:
Bids must be submitted no later than 90 days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. Envelopes reaching the MINISTRY after this date will not be taken into consideration. |
4. SELECTION CRITERIA
The MINISTRY will select the most appropriate COMPANY on the basis of the following criteria:
— |
the technical bid, which must include all the documents listed in point 3.2, |
— |
the financial bid, |
— |
the conditions of confidentiality, |
— |
a promotional programme for the area under consideration for the upcoming international licensing round, i.e. international road shows, data room equipment, etc., |
— |
international experience in non-exclusive seismic surveys, |
— |
the technical competence to perform the work (data acquisition, processing and interpretation of new and existing data) using the most up-to-date standards, |
— |
experience in similar geological areas. |
The MINISTRY will negotiate with the companies in order to reach its final decision, which should be announced two months at the latest after the deadline for submitting applications.
The MINISTRY reserves the right, at any time and at its sole discretion, to declare any application or the entire procedure void or to disqualify any applicant, even those fulfilling the obligatory terms and conditions.
Proposals will be valid for 90 calendar days after the final deadline for submissions.
5. PARTICIPATION FEES
All applicants must pay a participation fee amounting to EUR 5 000 by enclosing with their application a bank cheque issued by a recognised credit institution legally operating in Greece.
6. PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE
The selected COMPANY must also deposit a performance guarantee (Annex B) issued by a recognised credit institution legally operating in Greece, amounting to 5 % of the total project cost. This guarantee will remain in full force and effect until any and all obligations assumed by virtue of the contract have been fully implemented.
7. GOVERNING LAW — SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES
Any dispute regarding the interpretation or the application of or in connection with the contract will be brought before the arbitral tribunal in accordance with Law No 2735/1999 on international commercial arbitration, in the currently valid version. The arbitral tribunal comprises three arbitrators appointed in accordance with the rules on arbitration.
The place of arbitration proceedings will be Athens.
The law applicable to the contract will be Greek law.
8. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION — CLARIFICATIONS
For any additional information, please contact: Mr Dimitrios NOMIDIS, Head of the Directorate for Petroleum Policy, tel. +30 2106969410, E-mail: NomidisD@eka.ypeka.gr and Mr Charalampos PIPPOS, Head of the Directorate for Public Relations and International Affairs, tel. +30 2106969166, E-mail: ChPippos@eka.ypeka.gr
Clarifications may be also given in writing by the MINISTRY, at its own initiative or upon the request of an applicant, and will be communicated to all applicants.
In the event of any discrepancy between the Greek and the English versions, the Greek text will prevail.
ANNEX
INDICATIVE LOCATION MAP OF THE AREA OF THE SEISMIC SURVEY
V Announcements
PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY
European Commission
3.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353/15 |
Notice regarding a partial reopening of the anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China
2011/C 353/10
By its judgment of 17 February 2011 in Case T-122/09 (‘the judgement’) the General Court annulled Council Regulation (EC) No 1355/2008 of 18 December 2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China (1) (‘the contested Regulation’) in so far as it concerns Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd and Hubei Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd (‘the applicants’).
In April 2011, the Commission lodged an appeal (2) seeking to set aside the judgement. The appeal procedure is still pending.
1. Partial reopening of the anti-dumping investigation
The General Court, through its judgment, upheld the applicant's complaints alleging infringement of the rights of the defence and failure to state reasons and consequently annulled the contested Regulation. The General Court considered in particular that in the proceeding, leading to the adoption of the contested Regulation, the applicant's rights of the defence were breached and they were not provided with the information necessary for them to determine whether, in the light of the structure of the market, the adjustment as regards the post importation costs taken into account in calculating the price of products originating in China was appropriate. As regards the duty to state reasons the Court considered that the reasons for a measure must appear in the actual body of the measure and may not be stated in written or oral explanations given subsequently when the measure is already the subject of proceedings brought before the European Union Courts.
It is recognised by the Courts (3) that, in cases where a proceeding consists of several administrative steps, the annulment of one of those steps does not annul the complete proceeding. The anti-dumping proceeding is an example of such a multi-step proceeding. Consequently, the annulment of parts of the anti-dumping Regulation imposing definitive measures does not imply the annulment of the entire procedure prior to the adoption of the Regulation in question. On the other hand, according to Article 266 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the institutions of the European Union are obliged to comply with the judgment of 17 February 2011 of the General Court. Accordingly, the Union's institutions, in so complying with the judgment, have the possibility to remedy the aspects of the contested Regulation which led to its annulment (4). It must be noted that all other findings made in the contested Regulation, which are not affected as a consequence of the judgment, remain valid.
The Commission has thus decided to partially reopen the anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China in order to implement the abovementioned Court judgment as far as Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd and Hubei Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd are concerned.
2. Procedure
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that a partial reopening of the anti-dumping investigation is justified, the Commission hereby partially reopens the anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China initiated pursuant to Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (5) (‘the basic Regulation’) by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union (6).
As stated above, the Commission has lodged an appeal. The appeal is limited to the scope of the operative part of the judgment in so far as it annulled the duty, whereas it was undisputed that the legal flaw in question could only have had a limited impact on the duty level, if any. Therefore, since the appeal does not concern the grounds of the judgement, the Commission is considering whether it would be appropriate to already draw certain consequences from the legal errors identified by the General Court before the Court of Justice rules on the appeal. Moreover, the Commission also will examine whether the legal errors identified by the General Court, and described in the previous paragraph, can already be remedied before the ruling of the Court of Justice.
The reopening is limited in scope to the implementation of the abovementioned judgment as far as Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd and Hubei Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd are concerned.
All interested parties are hereby invited to make their views known, submit information and provide supporting evidence. This information and supporting evidence must reach the Commission within the time limit set in point 3(a).
Furthermore, the Commission may hear interested parties, provided that they make a request showing that there are particular reasons why they should be heard. This request must be made within the time limit set in point 3(b).
3. Time limits
(a) For parties to make themselves known and to submit information
All interested parties, if their representations are to be taken into account during the investigation, must make themselves known by contacting the Commission, present their views and submit any information within 20 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, unless otherwise specified. Attention is drawn to the fact that the exercise of most procedural rights set out in the basic Regulation depends on a party making itself known within the aforementioned period.
(b) Hearings
All interested parties may also apply to be heard by the Commission within the same 20-day time limit.
4. Written submissions and correspondence
All submissions and requests made by interested parties must be made in writing (not in electronic format, unless otherwise specified) and must indicate the name, address, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers of the interested party. All written submissions, including the information requested in this notice and correspondence provided by interested parties on a confidential basis shall be labelled as ‘Limited’ (7) and, in accordance with Article 19(2) of the basic Regulation, shall be accompanied by a non-confidential version, which will be labelled ‘For inspection by interested parties’.
Commission address for correspondence:
European Commission |
Directorate-General for Trade |
Directorate H |
Office: N105 04/092 |
1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
Fax +32 22956505 |
5. Non-cooperation
In cases in which any interested party refuses access to or does not provide the necessary information within the time limits, or significantly impedes the investigation, findings, affirmative or negative, may be made in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, on the basis of the facts available.
Where it is found that any interested party has supplied false or misleading information, the information shall be disregarded and use may be made, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, of the facts available. If an interested party does not cooperate or cooperates only partially, and use of facts available is made, the result may be less favourable to that party than if it had cooperated.
6. Processing of personal data
It is noted that any personal data collected in this investigation will be treated in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (8).
7. Hearing Officer
It is also noted that if interested parties consider that they are encountering difficulties in the exercise of their rights of defence, they may request the intervention of the Hearing Officer of the Directorate-General for Trade. He acts as an interface between the interested parties and the Commission services, offering, where necessary, mediation on procedural matters affecting the protection of their interests in this proceeding, in particular with regard to issues concerning access to file, confidentiality, extension of time limits and the treatment of written and/or oral submission of views. For further information and contact details interested parties may consult the Hearing Officer's web pages of the website of the Directorate-General for Trade (http://ec.europa.eu/trade).
(1) OJ L 350, 30.12.2008, p. 35.
(2) C-195/11 P.
(3) Case T-2/95 Industrie des poudres sphériques (IPS) v Council (1998) ECR II-3939.
(4) Case C-458/98 P Industrie des poudres sphériques (IPS) v Council (2000) ECR I-08147.
(5) OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.
(6) OJ C 246, 20.10.2007, p. 15.
(7) This means that the document is for internal use only. It is protected pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43). It is a confidential document pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation and Article 6 of the WTO Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the GATT 1994 (Anti-dumping Agreement).
PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY
European Commission
3.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353/18 |
Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6412 — Evraz/Alrosa/Mining and Metallurgical Company Timir JV)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 353/11
1. |
On 24 November 2011, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Evraz Group SA (‘Evraz’, Luxembourg) and Open Joint Stock Company Alrosa (‘Alrosa’, Russian Federation), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking Open Joint Stock Mining and Metallurgical Company Timir (‘Timir’, Russian Federation) by way of purchase of shares. |
2. |
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
|
3. |
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice. |
4. |
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission. Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6412 — Evraz/Alrosa/Mining and Metallurgical Company Timir JV, to the following address:
|
(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).
(2) OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).
OTHER ACTS
European Commission
3.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 353/19 |
Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs
2011/C 353/12
This publication confers the right to object to the application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 (1). Statements of objection must reach the Commission within six months of the date of this publication.
AMENDMENT APPLICATION
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006
AMENDMENT APPLICATION ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 9
‘OBERPFÄLZER KARPFEN’
EC No: DE-PGI-0105-0191-29.07.2010
PGI ( X ) PDO ( )
1. Heading in the product specification affected by the amendment:
— |
|
Name of product |
— |
|
Description of product |
— |
|
Geographical area |
— |
|
Proof of origin |
— |
|
Method of production |
— |
|
Link with the geographical area |
— |
|
Labelling |
— |
|
National requirements |
— |
|
Other (inspection bodies) |
2. Type of amendment(s):
— |
|
Amendment to single document or summary sheet |
— |
|
Amendment to specification of registered PDO or PGI for which neither the single document nor the summary sheet has been published |
— |
|
Amendment to specification that requires no amendment to the published single document (Article 9(3) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006) |
— |
|
Temporary amendment to specification resulting from imposition of obligatory sanitary or phytosanitary measures by public authorities (Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006) |
3. Amendment(s):
Amendments requested:
3.1. |
(d) Proof of origin: The sentence ‘ “Oberpfälzer Karpfen” is bred from the egg to the finished table fish in the Upper Palatinate itself’ is deleted. |
3.2. |
(e) Method of production: The first sentence is deleted and replaced as follows: ‘During the rearing process, “Oberpfälzer Karpfen” must spend at least one growing season, starting in April in the third production year from fry C2 to sale as table fish (at least C3), in the defined geographical area.’ Explanation:
|
3.3. |
(g) Inspection bodies:
|
SINGLE DOCUMENT
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006
‘OBERPFÄLZER KARPFEN’
EC No: DE-PGI-0105-0191-29.07.2010
PGI ( X ) PDO ( )
1. Name:
‘Oberpfälzer Karpfen’
2. Member State or third country:
Germany
3. Description of the agricultural product or foodstuff:
3.1. Type of product:
Class 1.7 — |
Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom |
3.2. Description of the product to which the name in point 1 applies:
Table carp live, slaughtered or processed into smoked fish (also in cuts such as fillets or cutlets) and finished products; minimum weight of individual live fish: 1 000 g; form: elongated. The meat is white, firm, tasty and low in fat with a unique flavour.
3.3. Raw materials (for processed products only):
Processed products must be produced from ‘Oberpfälzer Karpfen’ which have spent at least one growing season, starting in April in the third production year from fry C2 to sale as table fish (at least C3), in the defined geographical area. C2 designates carp which have spent two summers in the pond, and C3 designates carp which have spent three summers (full growth period) in the pond.
3.4. Feed (for products of animal origin only):
The carp feed predominantly on what is naturally available (bottom nutrients, zooplankton, etc.), with cereals added (but not maize) from local farms.
3.5. Specific steps in production that must take place in the defined geographical area:
‘Oberpfälzer Karpfen’ must spend at least one growing season, starting in April in the third production year from fry C2 to sale as table fish (at least C3), in the defined geographical area.
3.6. Specific rules concerning slicing, grating, packaging, etc.:
—
3.7. Specific rules concerning labelling:
—
4. Concise definition of the geographical area:
Government region of Oberpfalz (Upper Palatinate)/Bavaria
5. Link with the geographical area:
5.1. Specificity of the geographical area:
‘Oberpfälzer Karpfen’ is a product of traditional pond farming with a history going back several centuries. Carp pond farming in the Upper Palatinate started in the Cistercian monastery in Waldsassen (founded in 1132), was at its height in the 15th century and underwent a renaissance in the 20th century. Today carp pond farming is practised on about 3 000 farms in the Upper Palatinate, with a pond surface area of approx. 10 000 ha, and is thus one of the leading areas in Germany, representing a major economic factor in the structurally weak Upper Palatinate area.
As a result of the specific geographical and climate conditions (elevation, soil substrate, water quality, etc.), the Upper Palatinate is distinct from other pond farming regions. The region is characterised by relatively low temperatures and slightly acid soils.
5.2. Specificity of the product:
The meat of ‘Oberpfälzer Karpfen’ is white, firm, tasty and low in fat with a unique flavour. The product is traditionally highly regarded by consumers.
5.3. Causal link between the geographical area and the quality or characteristics of the product (for PDO) or a specific quality, the reputation or other characteristic of the product (for PGI):
The relatively low temperatures, and the weather conditions and slightly acid soils conducive to extensive farming, coupled with moderate use of natural feed supplements, lead to slower fish growth and the typical lean, firm meat. Through the food chain, the meat quality is also influenced by the soil substrate and water properties. The qualities of ‘Oberpfälzer Karpfen’ are thus closely linked to its geographical origin and, continuing the centuries-old tradition of pond farming in the Upper Palatinate, contribute to the reputation traditionally enjoyed by this product.
Reference to publication of the specification:
(Article 5(7) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006)
Markenblatt Vol. 07 of 19 February 2010, Part 7a-bb, p. 2507
http://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/geo/detail.pdfdownload/11251
(1) OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.