ISSN 1977-0677 |
||
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 242 |
|
![]() |
||
English edition |
Legislation |
Volume 63 |
Contents |
|
II Non-legislative acts |
page |
|
|
REGULATIONS |
|
|
* |
||
|
|
DECISIONS |
|
|
* |
||
|
* |
||
|
* |
||
|
* |
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1107 of 27 July 2020 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States (notified under document C(2020) 5208) ( 1 ) |
|
|
Corrigenda |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
(1) Text with EEA relevance. |
EN |
Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
II Non-legislative acts
REGULATIONS
28.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 242/1 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1103
of 22 July 2020
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Brie de Melun’ (PDO)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined France’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Brie de Melun’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 (2). |
(2) |
By letter of 26 September 2018, the French authorities notified the Commission that a transitional period under Article 15(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, ending on 31 December 2022, had been granted to operators established on their territory who meet the conditions laid down in that Article pursuant to the Order of 29 August 2018 on amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Brie de Melun’, published on 6 September 2018 in the Official Journal of the French Republic. The operators concerned, who had been legally marketing ‘Brie de Melun’ continuously for at least 5 years before the application was submitted, have lodged an objection as part of the national opposition procedure. One operator objected to the following provision: ‘During the permanent stabling period, the use of straw bedding is compulsory with at least 0,5 kg of straw being added on average per lactating dairy cow per day if a cubicle system is used and 5 kg of straw being added on average per lactating dairy cow per day if open stables are used’. The operator concerned is EARL de la Mardelle (SIRET: 38514961200017). Two operators objected to the following provisions: ‘The amount of concentrated feed provided may not exceed 25 % of the dry matter of the total ration per lactating dairy cow per day, averaged over a year’ and ‘Over a year, the hay fed to the milk herd must be supplied from the holding and the geographical area as follows: – from the holding: Feed originating in the geographical area and supplied by the holding must account for at least 50 % of the dry matter of the herd’s total ration, averaged over a year; – from the geographical area: The proportion of the feed originating in the geographical area of production must account for at least 80 % of the dry matter of the dairy herd’s total ration.’ The operators concerned are SCL du Versant laiteux (SIRET: 49225855300014) and GAEC Reconnu Patoux (SIRET: 38008216400019). One operator objected to the following provision: ‘The amount of concentrated feed provided may not exceed 25 % of the dry matter of the total ration per lactating dairy cow per day, averaged over a year.’ The operator concerned is Gérard Maurice Houdard (SIRET: 39226686200011). |
(3) |
Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation. |
(4) |
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Brie de Melun’ (PDO) are hereby approved.
Article 2
The protection provided under Article 1 is subject to the transitional period granted by France under Article 15(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 to operators meeting the conditions laid down in that Article, pursuant to the Order of 29 August 2018 on amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Brie de Melun’ published on 6 September 2018 in the Official Journal of the French Republic.
Article 3
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 22 July 2020.
For the Commission,
On behalf of the President,
Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.
(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 of 12 June 1996 on the registration of geographical indications and designations of origin under the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 (OJ L 148, 21.6.1996, p. 1).
DECISIONS
28.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 242/3 |
POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2020/1104
of 23 July 2020
on the reconfirmation of the authorisation of the European Union military operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI) (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI/1/2020)
THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 38 thereof,
Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/472 of 31 March 2020 on a European Union military operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI) (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
On 31 March 2020, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2020/472, which established and launched a European Union military operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI) for the period until 31 March 2021. |
(2) |
Article 8(3) of Decision (CFSP) 2020/472 provides that, notwithstanding this period, the authorisation of the operation is to be reconfirmed every four months and that the Political and Security Committee is to prolong the operation unless the deployment of maritime assets of the operation produces a pull effect on migration on the basis of substantiated evidence gathered according to the criteria set out in the Operations Plan. |
(3) |
The Operation Commander provided monthly pull factor reports. |
(4) |
The authorisation of the operation should be reconfirmed for the second four-month period of its mandate and the operation should be prolonged accordingly, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The authorisation of EUNAVFOR MED IRINI is hereby reconfirmed and the operation is prolonged from 31 July 2020 to 30 November 2020.
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
Done at Brussels, 23 July 2020.
For the Political and Security Committee
The Chairperson
S. FROM-EMMESBERGER
28.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 242/4 |
COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2020/1105
of 24 July 2020
amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/784 authorising the Italian Republic to apply a special measure derogating from Articles 206 and 226 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of valued added tax (1), and in particular Article 395(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) |
By Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1401 (2), Italy was authorised until 31 December 2017 to require that value added tax (VAT) due on supplies to public authorities was to be paid by those authorities to a separate and blocked bank account of the tax authorities. That special measure constituted a derogation from Articles 206 and 226 of Directive 2006/112/EC in relation to VAT payment and invoicing rules. |
(2) |
By Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/784 (3), Italy was authorised to apply the special measure until 30 June 2020, and the scope of that special measure was broadened to include supplies to certain companies controlled by public authorities and to companies listed on the stock exchange that are included in the Financial Times Stock Exchange Milano Indice di Borsa (‘FTSE MIB’) index. |
(3) |
By letter registered with the Commission on 4 December 2019, Italy requested that the authorisation to apply the special measure be prolonged until 31 December 2023 and that the scope of the special measure be restricted to supplies of goods and services to public authorities only. By letter registered with the Commission on 27 March 2020, Italy modified its request so as to make the requested prolongation identical in scope to the authorisation granted by Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/784. |
(4) |
By letter dated 5 May 2020, the Commission informed the other Member States of the request made by Italy. By letter dated 6 May 2020, the Commission notified Italy that it had all the information necessary to consider the request. |
(5) |
The special measure is part of a package of measures introduced by Italy in order to counter tax fraud and evasion. That package of measures, including an electronic invoicing obligation as authorised by Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/593 (4), has replaced other control measures and allows the Italian tax authorities to cross-check the different operations declared by the operators and to monitor their VAT payments. |
(6) |
Italy considers that, in the context of the package of measures implemented, mandatory electronic invoicing reduces the time needed by the tax administration to become aware of the existence of a potential case of tax fraud or evasion. However, Italy also considers that, in the absence of the split payment mechanism introduced by the special measure, recovery from the tax fraudsters or evaders once the cross-check has been carried out could be impossible if they are insolvent. Thus, the split payment mechanism, as an ex ante measure, has proved to be more effective than mandatory electronic invoicing which is an ex post measure. The definitive data on the effectiveness of the special measure show that it has been even more effective than expected. |
(7) |
One of the effects of the measure is that suppliers, being taxable persons, are not able to offset the VAT paid on their input with the VAT received on their supplies. Such suppliers may constantly be in a credit position and may need to ask for an effective refund of the VAT paid on their input from the tax administration. According to the information provided by Italy, taxable persons carrying out transactions subject to the split payment mechanism are entitled to receive the payment of the relevant VAT credits as a priority, within the limit of the credit deriving from such transactions. This practice implies that refund requests related to the split payment mechanism are processed with priority both during preliminary investigation and during the payment of sums due from non-priority refunds. |
(8) |
According to recital (7) of Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/784, once the system composed by the package of control measures Italy intended to apply was fully implemented, there should be no more need to derogate from Directive 2006/112/EC in order to apply the split payment. Therefore, Italy offered assurance that it would not seek to renew the derogation allowing the application of the split payment mechanism. However, given that it is still early to fully assess the effectiveness of these measures due to their recent implementation, and in view of the time of difficulties that Italy is experiencing due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which makes it more difficult for taxable persons to implement the changes required in their invoicing systems, and for the tax administrations to adapt their control and IT-systems, the removal of the measure could have significant negative effects in the fight against tax evasion and the collection of VAT, as well as on the administrative costs for taxable persons under the current circumstances. It is therefore appropriate to prolong the authorisation to derogate from Directive 2006/112/EC. |
(9) |
The requested derogation should be limited in time to allow an assessment as to whether the special measure is appropriate and effective. The authorisation should therefore be prolonged until 30 June 2023, which would leave sufficient time to assess the effectiveness of the measures implemented by Italy with the aim of reducing tax evasion in the sectors concerned. |
(10) |
To guarantee the necessary follow-up within the framework of the requested derogation and in particular to assess the impact on VAT refunds to taxable persons covered by that derogation, Italy should be required to submit a report to the Commission by September 2021 on the overall situation of, and in particular the average time needed for, VAT refunds to taxable persons, and on the effectiveness of the special measure and any other measures implemented by Italy with the aim of reducing tax evasion in the sectors concerned. That report should include a list of the different measures implemented, together with their date of entry into force. |
(11) |
The special measure is proportionate to the objectives pursued since it is limited in time and restricted to sectors which pose considerable problems as regards tax evasion. In addition, the special measure does not create a risk that tax evasion would shift to other sectors or other Member States. |
(12) |
Due to the difficulties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the process for the renewal of the derogation took more time than expected and was not finalised by 30 June 2020. Without retroactive application of this Decision, companies applying the split payment mechanism would have to change their invoicing systems to accommodate the changes overnight. The tax administration would have to implement similar adaptations to its systems. Due to those difficulties, it does not seem appropriate to request businesses and tax administration to undertake these changes at this moment. It is therefore appropriate to apply this Decision retroactively to ensure legal continuity of the measure. |
(13) |
The derogation will not negatively affect the overall amount of tax revenue collected at the stage of final consumption and will have no adverse impact on the Union’s own resources accruing from VAT. |
(14) |
Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/784 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/784 is amended as follows:
(1) |
in Article 3, the second subparagraph is replaced by the following: ‘By 30 September 2021, Italy shall submit a report to the Commission on the overall situation of VAT refunds to taxable persons affected by the measures referred to in Articles 1 and 2 and, in particular, on the average duration of the refund procedure and on the effectiveness of those measures and any other measures implemented by Italy with the aim of reducing tax evasion in the sectors concerned. That report shall include a list of the different measures implemented, together with their date of entry into force.’; |
(2) |
in Article 5, the date ‘30 June 2020’ is replaced by the date ‘30 June 2023’. |
Article 2
This Decision shall apply from 1 July 2020.
Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.
Done at Brussels, 24 July 2020.
For the Council
The President
M. ROTH
(1) OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1.
(2) Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1401 of 14 July 2015 authorising Italy to introduce a special measure derogating from Articles 206 and 226 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 217, 18.8.2015, p. 7).
(3) Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/784 of 25 April 2017 authorising the Italian Republic to apply a special measure derogating from Articles 206 and 226 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1401 (OJ L 118, 6.5.2017, p. 17).
(4) Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/593 of 16 April 2018 authorising the Italian Republic to introduce a special measure derogating from Articles 218 and 232 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 99, 19.4.2018, p. 14).
28.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 242/7 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2020/1106
of 24 July 2020
on the organisation of a temporary experiment under Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 2002/54/EC and 2002/57/EC as regards the official checking rate for field inspection under official supervision for basic seed, bred seed of generations prior to basic seed and certified seed
(notified under document C(2020) 4955)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 66/401/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of fodder plant seed (1), and in particular Article 13a thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 66/402/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of cereal seed (2), and in particular Article 13a thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/54/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of beet seed (3), and in particular Article 19 thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/57/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (4), and in particular Article 16 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Certified seed of fodder plants, cereals, beet and oil and fibre plants, pursuant to Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 2002/54/EC and 2002/57/EC respectively, are subject to field inspection under official supervision. A proportion of at least 5 % of the crop of such seed (hereinafter: ‘a fixed minimum rate of 5 %’) is subject to official checking in the field. |
(2) |
Basic seed and bred seed of generations prior to basic seed are certified if all crops of these seeds (hereinafter: ’a fixed rate of 100 %’) have undergone official field inspections, satisfying the conditions laid down in Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 2002/54/EC and 2002/57/EC. |
(3) |
In a recent temporary experiment organised on the basis of Commission Implementing Decision 2012/340/EU (5), it was demonstrated that also for basic seed and bred seed of generations prior to basic seed, field inspection under official supervision by licensed and trained seed company inspectors constitutes an improved alternative to official field inspection. The official checking of the established proportion of 5 % of seed crops was sufficient to demonstrate that the level of field inspections under official supervision can also be appropriate for basic seed and bred seed of generations prior to basic seed. However, further improvements may be possible taking into account the performance of the seed suppliers. |
(4) |
Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6) on official controls establishing a harmonised Union framework for the organisation of official controls along the entire agri-food chain requires competent authorities to perform official controls on all operators regularly, on a risk basis and with appropriate frequency. Based on the experience gained from the application of those rules, the possibility to have the official checking of seed crops in the field in the framework of official supervision carried out with frequencies established in accordance with a risk-based approach should be explored also under Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 2002/54/EC and 2002/57/EC. |
(5) |
For competent authorities, the planning of the frequency of their checks in the framework of official supervision, taking into account certain risk criteria in relation to the activities of seed suppliers and past compliance results, may constitute an improved alternative to the fixed minimum rate of 5 % applied for certified seed. As a consequence of the recent temporary experiment, it should also be tested for basic seed and bred seed of generations prior to basic seed, which is officially inspected at a rate of 100 %. |
(6) |
The responsible official bodies of the Member States should take into account certain risk criteria in relation to activities of the seed suppliers and past compliance results, for the planning of the frequencies of their official checks. It is necessary to lay down harmonised criteria for this purpose. A temporary experiment should therefore be organised to assess this alternative. |
(7) |
It is necessary to release the Member States participating in the experiment from the obligations of official field inspections of a fixed rate of 100 % of basic seed and bred seed of generations prior to basic seed and of checking, at a fixed minimum rate of 5 % of the seed crops for certified seed in the framework of official supervision as provided for in Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 2002/54/EC and 2002/57/EC. |
(8) |
Member States participating in the experiment should report annually to the Commission and the Member States in order to the keep other Member States and the Commission informed and facilitate the evaluation of the progress and the monitoring of the experiment. |
(9) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Subject matter
1. A temporary experiment (‘the experiment’) shall be organised at Union level assessing, as regards the official checking of crops for the production of basic seed, bred seed of generations prior to basic seed and of certified seed within the framework of field inspection under official supervision pursuant to the provisions, listed in paragraph 2 of this Article, of Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 2002/54/EC and 2002/57/EC:
(a) |
whether a risk-based approach carried out in accordance with Article 3 of this Decision may constitute an improved alternative to the checking of:
|
(b) |
whether the risk assessement criteria as laid down in Article 3(1) of this Decision are appropriate. |
2. The provisions referred to in paragraph 1 are the following:
(a) |
Article 2(1)(B)(1)(d), Article 2(3)(A)(c) and Article 14a(a) of Directive 66/401/EEC, and point (6) of Annex I thereto; |
(b) |
Article 2(1)(C)(d), Article 2(1)(Ca)(c), Article 2(1)(D)(1)(d), Article 2(1)(D)(2)(b), Article 2(1)(D)(3)(c), Article 2(3)(A)(c) and Article 14a(a) of Directive 66/402/EEC, and point (7) of Annex I thereto; |
(c) |
Article 2(1)(c)(iv), Article 2(3)(A)(c) and Article 21(a) of Directive 2002/54/EC, and point (4) of Part A of Annex I thereto; |
(d) |
Article 2(1)(c)(iv), Article 2(1)(d)(1)(ii), Article 2(1)(d)(2)(iii), Article 2(5)(A)(c) and Article 18(a) of Directive 2002/57/EC, and point (5) of Annex I thereto. |
Article 2
Participation of Member States
All Member States may participate in the experiment.
Member States which decide to participate in the experiment (‘the participating Member States’) shall inform the Commission and the other Member States indicating the species, categories and regions covered by their participation and any restrictions.
Participating Member States may end their participation at any time by informing the Commission accordingly.
Article 3
Risk assessment
1. The Member States shall carry out the risk assessment of the seed suppliers and adapt the extent of their official checks accordingly to a proportion between 1 % and 100 % of seed crops as regards field inspection under official supervision.
For the risk assessment of the seed suppliers, the following criteria shall be taken into account:
(a) |
species and production methods; |
(b) |
area of production and number of fields; |
(c) |
the activities under the control of the seed supplier; |
(d) |
the location of the activities or operations; |
(e) |
any information indicating likelihood that users of seed could be misled, in particular as to the identity, health and quality, properties, composition, quantity, country or area of origin, method of production of the seeds; |
(f) |
the seed suppliers’ past record as regards the outcome of official checking and post-controls performed on their crops and compliance with the requirement set out in paragraph 2; |
(g) |
the reliability and results of inspections that have been performed by the seed suppliers, in particular by a licensed field inspector or by a third party at the request of the seed suppliers, including, where appropriate, private quality assurance schemes, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the requirement set out in paragraph 2; |
(h) |
any information that might indicate non-compliance with the requirement set out in paragraph 2. |
2. The crop to be officially checked shall be grown from seed which has undergone official post-control in accordance with Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 2002/54/EC and 2002/57/EC.
3. A proportion of samples from the seed lots harvested from the crops shall be drawn for official post-control and, where appropriate, for official laboratory seed testing in respect of varietal identity and purity. Member States shall identify, seed lots for which official checks havebeen carried out in accordance with the risk-based approach set out in paragraph 1.
4. Participating Member States shall compare, for the same crop of the same field, the fixed minimum rate of 5 % of seed crops subject to official checking with the risk-based official checking of crops and harvested seeds where no fixed minimum rate is set.
Article 4
Derogations from Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 2002/54/EC and 2002/57/EC
By way of derogation from Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 2002/54/EC and 2002/57/EC, participating Member States are released, for the purposes of the experiment, from the obligations in respect of official field inspection of basic seed, bred seed of generations prior to basic seed and of official checking of certified seed, laid down in the following provisions:
(1) |
Article 2(1)(B)(1)(d), Article 2(3)(A)(c) and Article 14a(a) of Directive 66/401/EEC, and point (6) of Annex I thereto; |
(2) |
Article 2(1)(C)(d), Article 2(1)(Ca)(c), Article 2(1)(D)(1)(d), Article 2(1)(D)(2)(b), Article 2(1)(D)(3)(c), Article 2(3)(A)(c) and Article 14a(a) of Directive 66/402/EEC, and point (7) of Annex I thereto; |
(3) |
Article 2(1)(c)(iv), Article 2(3)(A)(c) and Article 21(a) of Directive 2002/54/EC, and point (4) of Part A of Annex I thereto; and |
(4) |
Article 2(1)(c)(iv), Article 2(1)(d)(1)(ii), Article 2(1)(d)(2)(iii), Article 2(5)(A)(c) and Article 18(a) of Directive 2002/57/EC, and point (5) of Annex I thereto. |
Article 5
Reporting
1. Participating Member States shall for each year, by 31 March of the following year, present to the Commission and to the other Member States a report on the results of the experiment carried out in accordance with Article 3.
2. At the end of the experiment and in any case at the end of their participation, participating Member States shall by 31 March of the following year, present to the Commission and the other Member States a final report on the results of the experiment.
That report may include other information the participating Member States consider relevant in view of the purpose of the experiment.
Article 6
Time period
The experiment shall start on 1 August 2020 and end on 31 July 2027.
Article 7
Addressees
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 24 July 2020.
For the Commission
Stella KYRIAKIDES
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ 125, 11.7.1966, p. 2298/66.
(2) OJ 125, 11.7.1966, p. 2309/66.
(3) OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 12.
(4) OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 74.
(5) Commission Implementing Decision 2012/340/EU of 25 June 2012 on the organisation of a temporary experiment under Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 2002/54/EC, 2002/55/EC and 2002/57/EC as regards field inspection under official supervision for basic seed and bred seed of generations prior to basic seed (OJ L 166, 27.6.2012, p. 90).
(6) Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products, amending Regulations (EC) No 999/2001, (EC) No 396/2005, (EC) No 1069/2009, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) No 1151/2012, (EU) No 652/2014, (EU) 2016/429 and (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulations (EC) No 1/2005 and (EC) No 1099/2009 and Council Directives 98/58/EC, 1999/74/EC, 2007/43/EC, 2008/119/EC and 2008/120/EC, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 854/2004 and (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 89/608/EEC, 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 96/23/EC, 96/93/EC and 97/78/EC and Council Decision 92/438/EEC (Official Controls Regulation) (OJ L 95, 7.4.2017, p. 1).
28.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 242/11 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2020/1107
of 27 July 2020
amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
(notified under document C(2020) 5208)
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption (3), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Commission Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU (4) lays down animal health control measures in relation to African swine fever in certain Member States, where there have been confirmed cases of that disease in domestic or feral pigs (the Member States concerned). The Annex to that Implementing Decision demarcates and lists certain areas of the Member States concerned in Parts I to IV thereof, differentiated by the level of risk based on the epidemiological situation as regards that disease. The Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU has been amended several times to take account of changes in the epidemiological situation in the Union as regards African swine fever that need to be reflected in that Annex. The Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU was last amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1053 (5), following changes in the epidemiological situation as regards that disease in Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. |
(2) |
Council Directive 2002/60/EC (6) lays down the minimum Union measures to be taken for the control of African swine fever. In particular, Article 9 of Directive 2002/60/EC provides for the establishment of a protection zone and a surveillance zone when African swine fever has been officially confirmed in pigs on a holding, and Articles 10 and 11 of that Directive lay down the measures to be taken in the protection and surveillance zones in order to prevent the spread of that disease. In addition, Article 15 of Directive 2002/60/EC lays down the measures to be taken where African swine fever is confirmed in feral pigs. Recent experience has shown that the measures laid down in Directive 2002/60/EC are effective in controlling the spread of that disease, and in particular, the measures providing for the cleaning and disinfecting of infected holdings and the other measures related to the eradication of that disease in domestic and feral pig populations. |
(3) |
Since the date of adoption of Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1053, there have been new occurrences of African swine fever in domestic pigs in Latvia and Poland, and in a feral pig in Slovakia. |
(4) |
In July 2020, two outbreaks of African swine fever in domestic pigs were observed in the county of Skrundas in Latvia in an area currently listed in Part II of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU. These outbreaks of African swine fever in domestic pigs constitute an increased level of risk, which should be reflected in that Annex. Accordingly, this area of Latvia, affected by these recent outbreaks of African swine fever, should now be listed in Part III of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU instead of in Part II thereof. |
(5) |
In July 2020, one outbreak of African swine fever in domestic pigs was observed in the gmina of Biłgoraj in Poland in an area currently listed in Part II of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU. This outbreak of African swine fever in domestic pigs constitutes an increased level of risk, which should be reflected in that Annex. Accordingly, this area of Poland, affected by this recent outbreak of African swine fever, should now be listed in Part III of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU instead of in Part II thereof. |
(6) |
In July 2020, one case of African swine fever in a feral pig was observed in the district of Rožňava in Slovakia in an area currently listed in Part I of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU. This case of African swine fever in a feral pig constitutes an increased level of risk, which should be reflected in that Annex. Accordingly, this area of Slovakia currently listed in Part I of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU affected by this recent case of African swine fever should now be listed in Part II of that Annex instead of in Part I thereof. |
(7) |
Following these recent outbreaks of African swine fever in domestic pigs in Latvia and Poland, and the recent case of African swine fever in a feral pig in Slovakia, and taking into account the current epidemiological situation in the Union, regionalisation in these Member States has been reassessed and updated. In addition, the risk management measures in place have also been reassessed and updated. These changes need to be reflected in the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU. |
(8) |
In order to take account of recent developments in the epidemiological situation of African swine fever in the Union, and in order to combat the risks associated with the spread of that disease in a proactive manner, new high-risk areas of a sufficient size should be demarcated for Latvia, Poland and Slovakia and duly listed in Parts II and III of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU. Given that Part III of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU lists the areas where the epidemiological situation is still evolving and very dynamic, when any amendments are made to areas listed in that Part, particular consideration must always be given to the effect on the surrounding areas, as has been done in this instance. Parts I, II and III of that Annex should therefore be amended accordingly. |
(9) |
Given the urgency of the epidemiological situation in the Union as regards the spread of African swine fever, it is important that the amendments made to the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU by this Decision take effect as soon as possible. |
(10) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 27 July 2020.
For the Commission
Stella KYRIAKIDES
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 13.
(2) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29.
(3) OJ L 18, 23.1.2003, p. 11.
(4) Commission Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU of 9 October 2014 concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States and repealing Implementing Decision 2014/178/EU (OJ L 295, 11.10.2014, p. 63).
(5) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1053 of 16 July 2020 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States (OJ L 230 I, 17.7.2020, p. 1).
(6) Council Directive 2002/60/EC of 27 June 2002 laying down specific provisions for the control of African swine fever and amending Directive 92/119/EEC as regards Teschen disease and African swine fever (OJ L 192, 20.7.2002, p. 27).
ANNEX
The Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU is replaced by the following:
‘ANNEX
PART I
1. Belgium
Les zones suivantes en Belgique:
dans la province de Luxembourg:
|
2. Estonia
The following areas in Estonia:
— |
Hiiu maakond. |
3. Hungary
The following areas in Hungary:
— |
Békés megye 950950, 950960, 950970, 951950, 952050, 952750, 952850, 952950, 953050, 953150, 953650, 953660, 953750, 953850, 953960, 954250, 954260, 954350, 954450, 954550, 954650, 954750, 954850, 954860, 954950, 955050, 955150, 955250, 955260, 955270, 955350, 955450, 955510, 955650, 955750, 955760, 955850, 955950, 956050, 956060, 956150 és 956160 kódszámú vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe, |
— |
Bács-Kiskun megye 600150, 600850, 601550, 601650, 601660, 601750, 601850, 601950, 602050, 603250, 603750 és 603850 kódszámú vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe, |
— |
Budapest 1 kódszámú, vadgazdálkodási tevékenységre nem alkalmas területe, |
— |
Csongrád-Csanád megye 800150, 800160, 800250, 802220, 802260, 802310 és 802450 kódszámú vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe, |
— |
Fejér megye 400150, 400250, 400351, 400352, 400450, 400550, 401150, 401250, 401350, 402050, 402350, 402360, 402850, 402950, 403050, 403250, 403350, 403450, 403550, 403650, 403750, 403950, 403960, 403970, 404570, 404650, 404750, 404850, 404950, 404960, 405050, 405750, 405850, 405950, 406050, 406150, 406550, 406650 és 406750 kódszámú vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe, |
— |
Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok megye 750150, 750160, 750260, 750350, 750450, 750460, 754450, 754550, 754560, 754570, 754650, 754750, 754950, 755050, 755150, 755250, 755350 és 755450 kódszámú vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe, |
— |
Komárom-Esztergom megye 250150, 250250, 250350, 250450, 250460, 250550, 250650, 250750, 250850, 250950, 251050, 251150, 251250, 251350, 251360, 251450, 251550, 251650, 251750, 251850, 252150 és 252250, kódszámú vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe, |
— |
Pest megye 571550, 572150, 572250, 572350, 572550, 572650, 572750, 572850, 572950, 573150, 573250, 573260, 573350, 573360, 573450, 573850, 573950, 573960, 574050, 574150, 574350, 574360, 574550, 574650, 574750, 574850, 574860, 574950, 575050,575150, 575250, 575350, 575550, 575650, 575750, 575850, 575950, 576050, 576150, 576250, 576350, 576450, 576650, 576750, 576850, 576950, 577050, 577150, 577350, 577450, 577650, 577850, 577950, 578050, 578150, 578250, 578350, 578360, 578450, 578550, 578560, 578650, 578850, 578950, 579050, 579150, 579250, 579350, 579450, 579460, 579550, 579650, 579750, 580250 és 580450 kódszámú vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe. |
4. Latvia
The following areas in Latvia:
— |
Pāvilostas novads, |
— |
Stopiņu novada daļa, kas atrodas uz rietumiem no autoceļa V36, P4 un P5, Acones ielas, Dauguļupes ielas un Dauguļupītes, |
— |
Ventspils novada Jūrkalnes pagasts, |
— |
Grobiņas novads, |
— |
Rucavas novada Dunikas pagasts. |
5. Lithuania
The following areas in Lithuania:
— |
Klaipėdos rajono savivaldybės: Agluonėnų, Priekulės, Veiviržėnų, Judrėnų, Endriejavo ir Vėžaičių seniūnijos, |
— |
Kretingos rajono savivaldybės: Darbėnų, Kretingos ir Žalgirio seniūnijos, |
— |
Plungės rajono savivaldybės: Nausodžio sen. dalis nuo kelio 166 į pietryčius ir Kulių seniūnija, |
— |
Skuodo rajono savivaldybės: Lenkimų, Mosėdžio, Skuodo, Skuodo miesto seniūnijos. |
6. Poland
The following areas in Poland:
w województwie warmińsko-mazurskim:
|
w województwie podlaskim:
|
w województwie mazowieckim:
|
w województwie podkarpackim:
|
w województwie świętokrzyskim:
|
w województwie łódzkim:
|
w województwie pomorskim:
|
w województwie lubuskim:
|
w województwie dolnośląskim:
|
w województwie wielkopolskim:
|
7. Slovakia
The following areas in Slovakia:
— |
the whole district of Vranov nad Topľou, |
— |
the whole district of Humenné, |
— |
the whole district of Snina, |
— |
the whole district of Sobrance, except municipalities included in part III |
— |
in the district of Michalovce, the whole municipalities of Tušice, Moravany, Pozdišovce, Michalovce, Zalužice, Lúčky, Závadka, Hnojné, Poruba pod Vihorlatom, Jovsa, Kusín, Klokočov, Kaluža, Vinné, Trnava pri Laborci, Oreské, Staré, Zbudza, Petrovce nad Laborcom, Lesné, Suché, Rakovec nad Ondavou, Nacina Ves, Voľa, Pusté Čemerné and Strážske, |
— |
in the district of Košice – okolie, the whole municipalities not included in Part II, |
— |
in the district of Gelnica, the whole municipalities of Uhorná, Smolník, Smolnícka Huta, Mníšek nad Hnilcom, Prakovce, Helcmanovce, Gelnica, Kojšov, Veľký Folkmár, Jaklovce, Žakarovce and Margecany, |
— |
in the district of Prešov, the whole municipalities of Klenov, Miklušovce, Sedlice, Suchá dolina, Janov, Radatice, Ľubovec, Ličartovce, Drienovská Nová Ves, Kendice, Petrovany, Drienov, Lemešany, Janovík, Bretejovce, Seniakovce, Šarišské Bohdanovce, Varhaňovce, Brestov Mirkovce, Žehňa, Tuhrina, Lúčina and Červenica, |
— |
in the district of Rožňava, the whole municipalities of Bôrka, Brzotín, Drnava, Gočaltovo, Honce, Hrhov, Hrušov, Jablonov nad Turňou, Jovice, Kováčová, Krásnohorská Dlhá Lúka, Krásnohorské Podhradie, Kružná, Kunová Teplica, Lipovník, Lúčka, Pača, Pašková, Pašková, Rakovnica, Rozložná, Rožňavské Bystré, Rožňava, Rudná, Silická Jablonica, Štítnik and Vidová, |
— |
in the district of Revúca, the whole municipalities of Držkovce, Chvalová, Gemerská Ves, Gemerské Teplice, Gemerský Sad, Hucín, Jelšava, Leváre, Levkuška, Licince, Nadraž, Otročok, Polina, Prihradzany, Rašice, Sekerešovo, Šivetice, Kameňany, Višňové and Žiar, |
— |
in the district of Rimavská Sobota, the whole municipalities of Abovce, Barca, Belín, Blhovce, Bottovo, Bátka, Cakov, Chanava, Chrámec, Drňa, Dubno, Dubovec, Dulovo, Figa, Gemerské Dechtáre, Gemerské Michalovce, Gemerský Jablonec, Gortva, Hajnáčka, Hodejov, Hodejovec, Hostice, Hubovo, Ivanice, Janice, Jesenské, Jestice, Kaloša, Kešovce, Kráľ, Lenartovce, Lenka, Martinová, Neporadza, Nová Bašta, Orávka, Pavlovce, Petrovce, Radnovce, Rakytník, Riečka, Rimavská Seč, Rimavské Janovce, Rumince, Stará Bašta, Stránska, Studená, Sútor, Tachty, Uzovská Panica, Valice, Večelkov, Vieska nad Blhom, Vlkyňa, Vyšné Valice, Včelince, Zádor, Číž, Šimonovce, Širkovce, Štrkovec and Žíp, |
— |
in the district of Lučenec, the whole municipalities of Trenč, Veľká nad Ipľom, Jelšovec, Panické Dravce, Lučenec, Kalonda, Rapovce, Trebeľovce, Mučín, Lipovany, Pleš, Fiľakovské Kováče, Ratka, Fiľakovo, Biskupice, Belina, Radzovce, Čakanovce, Šiatorská Bukovinka, Čamovce, Šurice, Halič, Mašková, Ľuboreč, Šíd and Prša, |
— |
in the district of Veľký Krtíš, the whole municipalities of Ipeľské Predmostie, Veľká Ves nad Ipľom, Sečianky, Kleňany, Hrušov, Vinica, Balog nad Ipľom, Dolinka, Kosihy nad Ipľom, Ďurkovce, Širákov, Kamenné Kosihy, Seľany, Veľká Čalomija, Malá Čalomija, Koláre, Trebušovce, Chrastince, Lesenice, Slovenské Ďarmoty, Opatovská Nová Ves, Bátorová, Nenince, Záhorce, Želovce, Sklabiná, Nová Ves, Obeckov, Vrbovka, Kiarov, Kováčovce, Zombor, Olováry, Čeláre, Glabušovce, Veľké Straciny, Malé Straciny, Malý Krtíš, Veľký Krtíš, Pôtor, Veľké Zlievce, Malé Zlievce, Bušince, Muľa, Ľuboriečka, Dolná Strehová, Vieska, Slovenské Kľačany, Horná Strehová, Chrťany and Závada. |
8. Greece
The following areas in Greece:
— |
in the regional unit of Drama:
|
— |
in the regional unit of Xanthi:
|
— |
in the regional unit of Rodopi:
|
— |
in the regional unit of Evros:
|
— |
in the regional unit of Serres:
|
PART II
1. Belgium
Les zones suivantes en Belgique:
dans la province de Luxembourg:
|
2. Bulgaria
The following areas in Bulgaria:
— |
the whole region of Haskovo, |
— |
the whole region of Yambol, |
— |
the whole region of Stara Zagora, |
— |
the whole region of Pernik, |
— |
the whole region of Kyustendil, |
— |
the whole region of Plovdiv, |
— |
the whole region of Pazardzhik, |
— |
the whole region of Smolyan, |
— |
the whole region of Burgas excluding the areas in Part III. |
3. Estonia
The following areas in Estonia:
— |
Eesti Vabariik (välja arvatud Hiiu maakond). |
4. Hungary
The following areas in Hungary:
— |
Békés megye 950150, 950250, 950350, 950450, 950550, 950650, 950660, 950750, 950850, 950860, 951050, 951150, 951250, 951260, 951350, 951450, 951460, 951550, 951650, 951750, 952150, 952250, 952350, 952450, 952550, 952650, 953250, 953260, 953270, 953350, 953450, 953550, 953560, 953950, 954050, 954060, 954150, 956250, 956350, 956450, 956550, 956650 és 956750 kódszámú vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe, |
— |
Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén megye valamennyi vadgazdálkodási egységének teljes területe, |
— |
Fejér megye 403150, 403160, 403260, 404250, 404550, 404560, 405450, 405550, 405650, 406450 és 407050 kódszámú vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe, |
— |
Hajdú-Bihar megye valamennyi vadgazdálkodási egységének teljes területe, |
— |
Heves megye valamennyi vadgazdálkodási egységének teljes területe, |
— |
Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok megye 750250, 750550, 750650, 750750, 750850, 750970, 750980, 751050, 751150, 751160, 751250, 751260, 751350, 751360, 751450, 751460, 751470, 751550, 751650, 751750, 751850, 751950, 752150, 752250, 752350, 752450, 752460, 752550, 752560, 752650, 752750, 752850, 752950, 753060, 753070, 753150, 753250, 753310, 753450, 753550, 753650, 753660, 753750, 753850, 753950, 753960, 754050, 754150, 754250, 754360, 754370, 754850, 755550, 755650 és 755750 kódszámú vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe, |
— |
Komárom-Esztergom megye: 251950, 252050, 252350, 252450, 252460, 252550, 252650, 252750, 252850, 252860, 252950, 252960, 253050, 253150, 253250, 253350, 253450 és 253550 kódszámú vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe, |
— |
Nógrád megye valamennyi vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe, |
— |
Pest megye 570150, 570250, 570350, 570450, 570550, 570650, 570750, 570850, 570950, 571050, 571150, 571250, 571350, 571650, 571750, 571760, 571850, 571950, 572050, 573550, 573650, 574250, 577250, 580050 és 580150 kódszámú vadgazdálkodási egységeinek teljes területe, |
— |
Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg megye valamennyi vadgazdálkodási egységének teljes területe. |
5. Latvia
The following areas in Latvia:
— |
Ādažu novads, |
— |
Aizputes novada, Aizputes un Cīravas pagasts, Kalvenes pagasta daļa uz rietumiem no ceļa pie Vārtājas upes līdz autoceļam A9, uz dienvidiem no autoceļa A9, uz rietumiem no autoceļa V1200, Kazdangas pagasta daļa uz rietumiem no ceļa V1200, P115, P117, V1296un Lažas pagasta daļa uz dienvidiem no autoceļa caur Miķelīšu mežu līdz autoceļam 1265, uz rietumiem no autoceļa, kas savieno autoceļu 1265 pie Mežmaļiem līdz robežai ar Rīvas upi, Aizputes pilsēta, |
— |
Aglonas novads, |
— |
Aizkraukles novads, |
— |
Aknīstes novads, |
— |
Alojas novads, |
— |
Alūksnes novads, |
— |
Amatas novads, |
— |
Apes novads, |
— |
Auces novads, |
— |
Babītes novads, |
— |
Baldones novads, |
— |
Baltinavas novads, |
— |
Balvu novads, |
— |
Bauskas novads, |
— |
Beverīnas novads, |
— |
Brocēnu novads, |
— |
Burtnieku novads, |
— |
Carnikavas novads, |
— |
Cēsu novads, |
— |
Cesvaines novads, |
— |
Ciblas novads, |
— |
Dagdas novads, |
— |
Daugavpils novads, |
— |
Dobeles novads, |
— |
Dundagas novads, |
— |
Durbes novads, |
— |
Engures novads, |
— |
Ērgļu novads, |
— |
Garkalnes novads, |
— |
Gulbenes novads, |
— |
Iecavas novads, |
— |
Ikšķiles novads, |
— |
Ilūkstes novads, |
— |
Inčukalna novads, |
— |
Jaunjelgavas novads, |
— |
Jaunpiebalgas novads, |
— |
Jaunpils novads, |
— |
Jēkabpils novads, |
— |
Jelgavas novads, |
— |
Kandavas novads, |
— |
Kārsavas novads, |
— |
Ķeguma novads, |
— |
Ķekavas novads, |
— |
Kocēnu novads, |
— |
Kokneses novads, |
— |
Krāslavas novads, |
— |
Krimuldas novads, |
— |
Krustpils novads, |
— |
Kuldīgas novada Ēdoles pagasta daļa uz ziemeļiem no autoceļa 1269, 1271, uz austrumiem no autoceļa 1288, uz ziemeļiem no autoceļa P119, Īvandes pagasta daļa uz ziemeļiem no autoceļa P119, uz austrumiem no autoceļa 1292, 1279, uz austrumiem no autoceļa, kas savieno autoceļu 1279 no Upītēm līdz autoceļam 1290, Kurmāles pagasta daļa uz ziemeļiem no autoceļa 1290, uz austrumiem no autoceļa, kas savieno autoceļu 1290 no Alejām līdz autoceļam 1283, uz austrumiem no autoceļa 1283 un P112, Turlavas pagasta daļa uz dienvidiem no autoceļa P112, Laidu pagasta daļa uz ziemeļiem no autoceļa V1296, Padures, Rumbas, Rendas, Kabiles, Vārmes, Pelču un Snēpeles pagasts, Kuldīgas pilsēta, |
— |
Lielvārdes novads, |
— |
Līgatnes novads, |
— |
Limbažu novads, |
— |
Līvānu novads, |
— |
Lubānas novads, |
— |
Ludzas novads, |
— |
Madonas novads, |
— |
Mālpils novads, |
— |
Mārupes novads, |
— |
Mazsalacas novads, |
— |
Mērsraga novads, |
— |
Naukšēnu novads, |
— |
Neretas novads, |
— |
Ogres novads, |
— |
Olaines novads, |
— |
Ozolnieku novads, |
— |
Pārgaujas novads, |
— |
Pļaviņu novads, |
— |
Preiļu novads, |
— |
Priekules novads, |
— |
Priekuļu novads, |
— |
Raunas novads, |
— |
republikas pilsēta Daugavpils, |
— |
republikas pilsēta Jelgava, |
— |
republikas pilsēta Jēkabpils, |
— |
republikas pilsēta Jūrmala, |
— |
republikas pilsēta Rēzekne, |
— |
republikas pilsēta Valmiera, |
— |
Rēzeknes novads, |
— |
Riebiņu novads, |
— |
Rojas novads, |
— |
Ropažu novads, |
— |
Rugāju novads, |
— |
Rundāles novads, |
— |
Rūjienas novads, |
— |
Salacgrīvas novads, |
— |
Salas novads, |
— |
Salaspils novads, |
— |
Saldus novads, |
— |
Saulkrastu novads, |
— |
Sējas novads, |
— |
Siguldas novads, |
— |
Skrīveru novads, |
— |
Skrundas novada Raņķu pagasta daļa uz ziemeļiem no autoceļa V1272 līdz robežai ar Ventas upi, Skrundas pagasta daļa no Skrundas uz ziemeļiem no autoceļa A9 un austrumiem no Ventas upes, |
— |
Smiltenes novads, |
— |
Stopiņu novada daļa, kas atrodas uz austrumiem no autoceļa V36, P4 un P5, Acones ielas, Dauguļupes ielas un Dauguļupītes, |
— |
Strenču novads, |
— |
Talsu novads, |
— |
Tērvetes novads, |
— |
Tukuma novads, |
— |
Vaiņodes novada Vaiņodes pagasts un Embūtes pagasta daļa uz dienvidiem autoceļa P116, P106, |
— |
Valkas novads, |
— |
Varakļānu novads, |
— |
Vārkavas novads, |
— |
Vecpiebalgas novads, |
— |
Vecumnieku novads, |
— |
Ventspils novada Ances, Tārgales, Popes, Vārves, Užavas, Piltenes, Puzes, Ziru, Ugāles, Usmas un Zlēku pagasts, Piltenes pilsēta, |
— |
Viesītes novads, |
— |
Viļakas novads, |
— |
Viļānu novads, |
— |
Zilupes novads. |
6. Lithuania
The following areas in Lithuania:
— |
Alytaus miesto savivaldybė, |
— |
Alytaus rajono savivaldybė: Alytaus, Alovės, Butrimonių, Daugų, Nemunaičio, Pivašiūnų, Punios, Raitininkų seniūnijos, |
— |
Anykščių rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Akmenės rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Biržų miesto savivaldybė, |
— |
Biržų rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Druskininkų savivaldybė, |
— |
Elektrėnų savivaldybė, |
— |
Ignalinos rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Jonavos rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Joniškio rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Jurbarko rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Kaišiadorių rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Kalvarijos savivaldybė, |
— |
Kauno miesto savivaldybė, |
— |
Kauno rajono savivaldybė: Domeikavos, Garliavos, Garliavos apylinkių, Karmėlavos, Lapių, Linksmakalnio, Neveronių, Rokų, Samylų, Taurakiemio, Vandžiogalos ir Vilkijos seniūnijos, Babtų seniūnijos dalis į rytus nuo kelio A1, Užliedžių seniūnijos dalis į rytus nuo kelio A1 ir Vilkijos apylinkių seniūnijos dalis į vakarus nuo kelio Nr. 1907, |
— |
Kazlų rūdos savivaldybė: Kazlų rūdos seniūnija į šiaurę nuo kelio Nr. 230, į rytus nuo kelio Kokė-Užbaliai-Čečetai iki kelio Nr. 2610 ir į pietus nuo kelio Nr. 2610, |
— |
Kelmės rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Kėdainių rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Kupiškio rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Kretingos rajono savivaldybė: Imbarės, Kūlupėnų ir Kartenos seniūnijos, |
— |
Lazdijų rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Marijampolės savivaldybė: Degučių, Marijampolės, Mokolų, Liudvinavo ir Narto seniūnijos, |
— |
Mažeikių rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Molėtų rajono savivaldybė: Alantos seniūnijos dalis į vakarus nuo kelio 119 ir į šiaurę nuo kelio Nr. 2828, Balninkų, Dubingių, Giedraičių, Joniškio ir Videniškių seniūnijos, |
— |
Pagėgių savivaldybė, |
— |
Pakruojo rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Panevėžio rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Panevėžio miesto savivaldybė, |
— |
Pasvalio rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Radviliškio rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Rietavo savivaldybė, |
— |
Prienų rajono savivaldybė: Stakliškių ir Veiverių seniūnijos, |
— |
Plungės rajono savivaldybė: Babrungo, Alsėdžių, Žlibinų, Stalgėnų, Paukštakių, Platelių ir Žemaičių Kalvarijos, Nausodžio sen. dalis nuo kelio Nr. 166 į šiaurės vakarus, Plungės miesto ir Šateikių seniūnijos, |
— |
Raseinių rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Rokiškio rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Skuodo rajono savivaldybės: Aleksandrijos, Barstyčių, Ylakių, Notėnų ir Šačių seniūnijos, |
— |
Šakių rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Šalčininkų rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Šiaulių miesto savivaldybė, |
— |
Šiaulių rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Šilutės rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Širvintų rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Šilalės rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Švenčionių rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Tauragės rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Telšių rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Trakų rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Ukmergės rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Utenos rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Varėnos rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Vilniaus miesto savivaldybė, |
— |
Vilniaus rajono savivaldybė, |
— |
Vilkaviškio rajono savivaldybė: Bartninkų, Gražiškių, Keturvalakių, Kybartų, Klausučių, Pajevonio, Šeimenos, Vilkaviškio miesto, Virbalio, Vištyčio seniūnijos, |
— |
Visagino savivaldybė, |
— |
Zarasų rajono savivaldybė. |
7. Poland
The following areas in Poland:
w województwie warmińsko-mazurskim:
|
w województwie podlaskim:
|
w województwie mazowieckim:
|
w województwie lubelskim:
|
w województwie podkarpackim:
|
w województwie pomorskim:
|
w województwie świętokrzyskim:
|
w województwie lubuskim:
|
w województwie dolnośląskim:
|
w województwie wielkopolskim:
|
w województwie łódzkim:
|
8. Slovakia
The following areas in Slovakia:
— |
in the district of Košice – okolie, the whole municipalities of Belza, Bidovce, Blažice, Bohdanovce, Byster, Čaňa, Ďurďošík, Ďurkov, Geča, Gyňov, Haniska, Kalša, Kechnec, Kokšov- Bakša, Košická Polianka, Košický Klečenov, Milhosť, Nižná Hutka, Nižná Mysľa, Nižný Čaj, Nižný Olčvár, Nový Salaš, Olšovany, Rákoš, Ruskov, Seňa, Skároš, Sokoľany, Slančík, Slanec, Slanská Huta, Slanské Nové Mesto, Svinica, Trstené pri Hornáde, Valaliky, Vyšná Hutka, Vyšná Myšľa, Vyšný Čaj, Vyšný Olčvár, Zdoba, Ždaňa, Hrašovík, Beniakovce, Budimír, Družstevná pri Hornáde, Kostoľany nad Hornádom, Sokoľ, Trebejov, Obišovce, Kysak, Veľká Lodina, Košická Belá, Opátka, Vyšný Klátov, Nižný Klátov, Hýľov, Bukovec, Baška,Nováčany, Hodkovce, Šemša and Malá IDA, |
— |
the whole city of Košice, |
— |
the whole district of Trebišov, except municipalities included in Part III, |
— |
in the district of Michalovce, the whole municipalities of the district not included in Part I and Part III, |
— |
in the district of Revúca, the whole municipalities of Gemer and Tornaľa, |
— |
in the district of Rožňava, the whole municipalities of Ardovo, Bohúňovo, Bretka, Čoltovo, Dlhá Ves, Gemerská Hôrka, Gemerská Panica, Kečovo, Meliata, Plešivec, Silica, Silická Brezová, Slavec, |
9. Romania
The following areas in Romania:
— |
Judeţul Bistrița-Năsăud, |
— |
Județul Suceava. |
PART III
1. Bulgaria
The following areas in Bulgaria:
— |
the whole region of Blagoevgrad, |
— |
the whole region of Dobrich, |
— |
the whole region of Gabrovo, |
— |
the whole region of Kardzhali, |
— |
the whole region of Lovech, |
— |
the whole region of Montana, |
— |
the whole region of Pleven, |
— |
the whole region of Razgrad, |
— |
the whole region of Ruse, |
— |
the whole region of Shumen, |
— |
the whole region of Silistra, |
— |
the whole region of Sliven, |
— |
the whole region of Sofia city, |
— |
the whole region of Sofia Province, |
— |
the whole region of Targovishte, |
— |
the whole region of Vidin, |
— |
the whole region of Varna, |
— |
the whole region of Veliko Tarnovo, |
— |
the whole region of Vratza, |
— |
in Burgas region:
|
2. Latvia
The following areas in Latvia:
— |
Aizputes novada Lažas pagasta daļa uz ziemeļiem no autoceļa caur Miķelīšu mežu līdz autoceļam 1265, uz austrumiem no autoceļa, kas savieno autoceļu 1265 pie Mežmaļiem līdz robežai ar Rīvas upi, Kalvenes pagasta daļa uz austrumiem no ceļa pie Vārtājas upes līdz autoceļam A9, uz ziemeļiem no autoceļa A9, uz austrumiem no autoceļa V1200, Kazdangas pagasta daļa uz austrumiem no ceļa V1200, P115, P117, V1296, |
— |
Alsungas novads, |
— |
Kuldīgas novada Gudenieku pagasts, Ēdoles pagasta daļa uz dienvidiem no autoceļa 1269, 1271, uz rietumiem no autoceļa 1288, uz dienvidiem no autoceļa P119, Īvandes pagasta daļa uz dienvidiem no autoceļa P119, uz rietumiem no autoceļa 1292, 1279, uz rietumiem no autoceļa, kas savieno autoceļu 1279 no Upītēm līdz autoceļam 1290, Kurmāles pagasta daļa uz dienvidiem no autoceļa 1290, uz rietumiem no autoceļa, kas savieno autoceļu 1290 no Alejām līdz autoceļam 1283, uz rietumiem no autoceļa 1283 un P112, Turlavas pagasta daļa uz ziemeļiem no autoceļa P112, Laidu pagasta daļa uz dienvidiem no autoceļa V1296, |
— |
Skrundas novada Rudbāržu, Nīkrāces pagasts, Raņķu pagasta daļa uz dienvidiem no autoceļa V1272 līdz robežai ar Ventas upi, Skrundas pagasts (izņemot pagasta daļa no Skrundas uz ziemeļiem no autoceļa A9 un austrumiem no Ventas upes), Skrundas pilsēta, |
— |
Vaiņodes novada Embūtes pagasta daļa uz ziemeļiem autoceļa P116, P106. |
3. Lithuania
The following areas in Lithuania:
— |
Alytaus rajono savivaldybė: Simno, Krokialaukio ir Miroslavo seniūnijos, |
— |
Birštono savivaldybė, |
— |
Kauno rajono savivaldybė: Akademijos, Alšėnų, Batniavos, Čekiškės, Ežerėlio, Kačerginės, Kulautuvos, Raudondvario, Ringaudų ir Zapyškio seniūnijos, Babtų seniūnijos dalis į vakarus nuo kelio A1, Užliedžių seniūnijos dalis į vakarus nuo kelio A1 ir Vilkijos apylinkių seniūnijos dalis į rytus nuo kelio Nr. 1907, |
— |
Kazlų Rūdos savivaldybė: Antanavo, Jankų, Kazlų rūdos seniūnijos dalis Kazlų Rūdos seniūnija į pietus nuo kelio Nr. 230, į vakarus nuo kelio Kokė-Užbaliai-Čečetai iki kelio Nr. 2610 ir į šiaurę nuo kelio Nr. 2610, Plutiškių seniūnijos, |
— |
Marijampolės savivaldybė: Gudelių, Igliaukos, Sasnavos ir Šunskų seniūnijos, |
— |
Molėtų rajono savivaldybė: Alantos seniūnijos dalis į rytus nuo kelio Nr. 119 ir į pietus nuo kelio Nr. 2828, Čiulėnų, Inturkės, Luokesos, Mindūnų ir Suginčių seniūnijos, |
— |
Prienų rajono savivaldybė: Ašmintos, Balbieriškio, Išlaužo, Jiezno, Naujosios Ūtos, Pakuonio, Prienų ir Šilavotos seniūnijos, |
— |
Vilkaviškio rajono savivaldybės: Gižų ir Pilviškių seniūnijos. |
4. Poland
The following areas in Poland:
w województwie warmińsko-mazurskim:
|
w województwie podlaskim:
|
w województwie mazowieckim:
|
w województwie lubelskim:
|
w województwie podkarpackim:
|
w województwie lubuskim:
|
w województwie wielkopolskim:
|
w województwie dolnośląskim:
|
5. Romania
The following areas in Romania:
— |
Zona orașului București, |
— |
Județul Constanța, |
— |
Județul Satu Mare, |
— |
Județul Tulcea, |
— |
Județul Bacău, |
— |
Județul Bihor, |
— |
Județul Brăila, |
— |
Județul Buzău, |
— |
Județul Călărași, |
— |
Județul Dâmbovița, |
— |
Județul Galați, |
— |
Județul Giurgiu, |
— |
Județul Ialomița, |
— |
Județul Ilfov, |
— |
Județul Prahova, |
— |
Județul Sălaj, |
— |
Județul Vaslui, |
— |
Județul Vrancea, |
— |
Județul Teleorman, |
— |
Judeţul Mehedinţi, |
— |
Județul Gorj, |
— |
Județul Argeș, |
— |
Judeţul Olt, |
— |
Judeţul Dolj, |
— |
Județul Arad, |
— |
Județul Timiș, |
— |
Județul Covasna, |
— |
Județul Brașov, |
— |
Județul Botoșani, |
— |
Județul Vâlcea, |
— |
Județul Iași, |
— |
Județul Hunedoara, |
— |
Județul Alba, |
— |
Județul Sibiu, |
— |
Județul Caraș-Severin, |
— |
Județul Neamț, |
— |
Județul Harghita, |
— |
Județul Mureș, |
— |
Județul Cluj, |
— |
Judeţului Maramureş. |
6. Slovakia
— |
Region Trebišov – municipalities located east of river Bodrog |
— |
Region Michalovce – municipalities: Odorín, Petríkovce, Malčice, Markovce, Sliepkovce, Budkovce, Slavkovce, Zemplínske Kopčany, Malé Raškovce, Veľké Raškovce, Beša, Ižkovce, Drahňov, Stretavka, Stretava, Palín, Senné, Pavlovce nad Uhom, Krišovská Liesková, Vojany, Čičarovce, Veľké Kapušany, Čierne Pole, Kapušianske Kľačany, Ptrukša, Veľké Slemence, Ruská, Budince, Maťovské Vojkovce, Bajany, Vysoká nad Uhom; |
— |
Region Sobrance – municipalities Lekárovce, Pinkovce, Záhor, Bežovce; |
PART IV
Italy
The following areas in Italy:
— |
tutto il territorio della Sardegna. |
Corrigenda
28.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 242/41 |
Corrigendum to Council Directive 85/148/EEC of 29 January 1985 amending Directive 81/645/EEC concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive 75/268/EEC (Greece)
( Official Journal of the European Communities L 56 of 25 February 1985 )
1. |
On page 18, in the Annex, table titled ‘ΠΙΝΑΚΑΣ ΟΡΕΙΝΩΝ ΔΗΜΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΗΤΩΝ (ΑΡΘΡΟ 3 ΠΑΡΑΓΡΑΦΟΣ 3)’, second column, point 30: |
for:
‘30. |
Νόμος ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΑΣ’, |
read:
‘30. |
Νομός ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΑΣ’. |
2. |
On page 19, in the Annex, table titled ‘ΠΙΝΑΚΑΣ ΟΡΕΙΝΩΝ ΔΗΜΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΗΤΩΝ (ΑΡΘΡΟ 3 ΠΑΡΑΓΡΑΦΟΣ 3)’, under ‘30. Νομός ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΑΣ’, first column, point 59: |
for:
‘Σαραντάπηχου (Οικ. Σαρανταπηχιώτικα)’,
read:
‘Σαρανταπήχου (εκτός οικισμού Σαρανταπηχιώτικα)’.