(1)

On 23 April 2007, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate a free trade agreement (FTA) with Member States of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). That authorisation provided for the possibility of bilateral negotiations.

(2)

On 22 December 2009, the Council authorised the Commission to pursue bilateral FTA negotiations with individual ASEAN Member States, starting with Singapore, which were to be conducted in accordance with the existing negotiating directives.

(3)

The negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore (the Agreement) have been concluded, and the Agreement should be signed on behalf of the Union, subject to the fulfilment of the procedures required for conclusion at a later date,

(1)

By Decision 2000/365/EC (1) the Council authorised the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (‘the United Kingdom’) to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis, in accordance with the conditions set out in that Decision.

(2)

Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) established the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (‘the Agency’), commonly referred to as eu-LISA, in order to ensure the operational management of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), the Visa Information System (VIS) and Eurodac and of certain aspects of their communication infrastructures and potentially that of other large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice, on the basis of separate Union legal acts, based on Articles 67 to 89 of the TFEU.

(3)

By Decision 2010/779/EU (3) the Council authorised the United Kingdom to take part in Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 to the extent that it relates to the operational management of the VIS and the parts of the SIS II in which the United Kingdom does not participate.

(4)

On 29 June 2017 the European Commission presented a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA), and amending Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 (‘the proposed Regulation’).

(5)

According to the proposed Regulation, the Agency will be replaced and succeeded by the European Union Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) (‘the proposed Agency’) that will be the legal successor of the Agency. The proposed Agency will be made responsible, as is the case for the Agency, for the operational management of the SIS II, VIS and Eurodac. The proposed Agency will be also responsible for the preparation, development or operational management of the Entry/Exit System (EES), DubliNet and the European Travel Authorisation and Information System (ETIAS) and it might be made responsible for the preparation, development and operational management of other large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice if so provided by relevant Union legal acts based on Articles 67 to 89 of the TFEU.

(6)

SIS II is part of the Schengen acquis. Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA (5) govern the establishment, operation and use of SIS II. However, the United Kingdom has only taken part in the adoption of Decision 2007/533/JHA which develops the provisions of the Schengen acquis referred to in Article 1(a)(ii) of Decision 2000/365/EC.

(7)

VIS is also part of the Schengen acquis. The United Kingdom did not take part in the adoption of, and is not bound by Council Decision 2004/512/EC (6), Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7) and Council Decision 2008/633/JHA (8) which govern the establishment, operation or use of VIS.

(8)

Eurodac is not part of the Schengen acquis. The United Kingdom has taken part in the adoption of, and is bound by Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (9) which governs the establishment, operation and use of Eurodac.

(9)

The EES is part of the Schengen acquis. The United Kingdom did not take part in the adoption of, and is not bound by Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council (10) which govern the establishment, operation and use of the EES.

(10)

ETIAS is also part of the Schengen acquis. The United Kingdom did not take part in the adoption of, and is not bound by Regulation (EU) 2018/1240 of the European Parliament and of the Council (11) which govern the establishment, operation and use of ETIAS.

(11)

DubliNet is not part of the Schengen acquis. The United Kingdom is bound by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003 (12) which sets up DubliNet, a separate secure electronic transmission channel.

(12)

Given its participation in Eurodac, DubliNet and its partial participation in SIS II, the United Kingdom has the right to participate in the activities of the proposed Agency, to the extent that it will be responsible for the operational management of SIS II as governed by Decision 2007/533/JHA, Eurodac and DubliNet, as is the case with regard to the Agency.

(13)

The proposed Agency, as is the case for the Agency, should have a single legal personality and be characterised by the unity of its organisational and financial structure. To this end, the proposed Agency should be established by means of a single legislative instrument which should be voted on within the Council in its entirety. Moreover, once adopted, the proposed Regulation should become applicable in its entirety in the Member States bound by it. This excludes the possibility of partial applicability for the United Kingdom.

(14)

In order to ensure compliance with the Treaties and the applicable Protocols, and at the same time to safeguard the unity and consistency of the proposed Regulation, the United Kingdom has requested to take part in the proposed Regulation under Article 4 of the Protocol No 19 to the extent that its provisions refer to the responsibility of the Agency for the operational management of SIS II as governed by Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006, and of the VIS, the EES and ETIAS.

(15)

The Council recognises the right of the United Kingdom to make, in accordance with Article 4 of the Protocol No 19, a request for participation in the proposed Regulation, to the extent that the United Kingdom will not participate in the proposed Regulation on other grounds.

(16)

Participation of the United Kingdom in the proposed Regulation would be without prejudice to the fact that at present the United Kingdom does not and cannot participate in the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the free movement of third country nationals, visa policy and the crossing by persons of the external borders of the Member States. This would justify the inclusion of specific provisions in the proposed Regulation reflecting this special position of the United Kingdom, in particular as regards limited voting rights in the Management Board of the Agency.

(17)

The Mixed Committee, established pursuant to Article 3 of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters' association with the implementation, application, and development of the Schengen acquis (13), has been informed about the preparation of this Decision in accordance with Article 5 of that Agreement.

(18)

The Mixed Committee, established pursuant to Article 3 of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (14), has been informed about the preparation of this Decision in accordance with Article 5 of that Agreement,

(1)

Action by the Union in the sector of maritime transport should aim to protect the marine environment and improve maritime safety.

(2)

The Marine Environment Protection Committee (‘MEPC’) of the International Maritime Organization (‘IMO’), during its 73rd session on 22 to 26 October 2018 (‘MEPC 73’), is expected to adopt amendments to regulation 14 of Annex VI to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (‘MARPOL Annex VI’).

(3)

The Maritime Safety Committee (‘MSC’) of the IMO, during its 100th session on 3 to 7 December 2018 (‘MSC 100’), is expected to adopt amendments to the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections During Surveys of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (‘2011 ESP Code’).

(4)

It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union's behalf during MEPC 73, as the amendments to regulation 14 of MARPOL Annex VI will be capable of decisively influencing the content of Union law, namely Directive (EU) 2016/802 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

(5)

It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union's behalf during MSC 100, as the amendments to the 2011 ESP Code will be capable of decisively influencing the content of Union law, namely Regulation (EU) No 530/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2).

(6)

The amendments to regulation 14 of MARPOL Annex VI concerning the prohibition on the carriage of non-compliant fuel oil for combustion purposes for propulsion or operation on board a ship should ensure robust enforcement of the fuel oil standard set out in regulation 14.1.3 of MARPOL Annex VI, which becomes effective on 1 January 2020.

(7)

The amendments to the 2011 ESP Code should include editorial changes to the Code, identifying all mandatory requirements and improving the tables and forms, as well as merge the editorial changes with new substantial requirements in order to deal with recent updates to the International Association of Classification Societies' Unified Requirements Z10 series.

(8)

To the extent that the amendments to regulation 14 of MARPOL Annex VI and to the 2011 ESP Code may affect the provisions of Directive (EU) 2016/802 and Regulation (EU) No 530/2012, those amendments fall under the exclusive competence of the Union.

(9)

The Union is not a member of the IMO, nor is it a contracting party to the relevant conventions and codes. The Council should therefore authorise the Member States to express the position of the Union and to express their consent to be bound by those amendments, to the extent that those amendments fall under the exclusive competence of the Union,