ISSN 1977-0677 |
||
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 208 |
|
English edition |
Legislation |
Volume 61 |
Contents |
|
II Non-legislative acts |
page |
|
|
REGULATIONS |
|
|
* |
||
|
* |
||
|
|
DECISIONS |
|
|
* |
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1147 of 10 August 2018 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions for waste treatment, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2018) 5070) ( 1 ) |
|
|
* |
||
|
|
RECOMMENDATIONS |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
(1) Text with EEA relevance. |
EN |
Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
II Non-legislative acts
REGULATIONS
17.8.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 208/1 |
COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2018/1145
of 7 June 2018
amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 as regards producer organisations in the fruit and vegetables sector
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 37 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 (2) supplements Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 with regard to the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors. Regulation (EU) 2017/2393 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3) has amended Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 in particular as regards the aid to the producer organisations in the fruit and vegetables sector. Therefore, Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 should reflect the amendments to the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
(2) |
Provisions on national financial assistance in the fruit and vegetables sector should be updated. |
(3) |
Provisions concerning the cases in which producer members of a producer organisation should be allowed to sell a certain percentage of their products outside the producer organisation where the producer organisation so authorises in its statutes and where this is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Member State need to be clarified. The threshold of the sales outside the producer organisation needs to be clarified. |
(4) |
New measures on coaching between producer organisations and on replenishment of mutual funds in operational programmes should be eligible for Union financial assistance. |
(5) |
Member States may continue to provide national financial assistance from national budget to producer organisations in regions of the Union where the organisation degree is particularly low. Consequently, conditions under which national financial assistance may be granted in the fruit and vegetables sector as well as the method of calculation of the degree of organisation referred to in Article 34(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 should be laid down to avoid distortions of the internal market in the Union. |
(6) |
Provisions concerning eligibility of certain investments for Union financial assistance need to be clarified. |
(7) |
Eligible and non-eligible actions related to promotion and communication, including actions and activities aimed at diversification and consolidation on the fruit and vegetable markets, whether for prevention of a crisis or during a crisis period, need to be clarified as regards the eligibility of actions and activities for Union financial assistance. |
(8) |
Provisions relating to the annual reports on producer organisations, associations of producers organisations, including transnational associations of producer organisations, and producer groups, and on operational funds, operational programmes and recognition plans should be simplified. They need to enable the Commission to adequately monitor the sector. |
(9) |
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
(10) |
Transitional provisions should be laid down to ensure a smooth transition from the existing requirements, measures and actions laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 to the new ones provided for in this Regulation. |
(11) |
This Regulation should apply from the same date as Regulation (EU) 2017/2393. However, the provisions concerning national financial assistance, indicators and monitoring should apply from 1 January 2019 to allow Member States and economic operators time to adapt to the new rules, |
(12) |
The conditions for the application of the new measures and actions eligible for Union financial assistance set out in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 should apply from the date of application of the amendments to that Regulation introduced by Regulation (EU) 2017/2393 to ensure market stability for producer organisations and their members, in particular given that those measures concern mainly crisis management and prevention and to enable them to fully benefit from the new measures. To safeguard legitimate expectations, producer organisations may choose to continue the ongoing operational programmes under the rules applicable at the time of the approval of the programmes or to modify their operational programmes to benefit from the new measures and actions eligible for Union financial assistance, as set out in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Amendments to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 is amended as follows:
(1) |
Article 2(e) is replaced as follows:
|
(2) |
Article 12 is replaced as follows: ‘Article 12 Marketing of the production outside the producer organisation 1. Where the producer organisation so authorises in its statutes and where this is in compliance with the terms and conditions laid down by the Member State and the producer organisation, the producer members may:
2. The percentage of the production that the producer members market outside the producer organisation, as referred to in paragraph 1 shall not exceed 25 % in volume or in value of the marketable production of each producer member. However, Member States may set a lower percentage of the production that the producer members may market outside the producer organisation than the one set out in the first subparagraph. Member States may increase that percentage up to 40 % in case of products covered by Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 (*1) or where producer members market their production through another producer organisation designated by their own producer organisation. (*1) Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 (OJ L 189, 20.7.2007, p. 1).’;" |
(3) |
in Article 22, paragraph 10 is replaced as follows: ‘10. Where a reduction in production occurs due to a natural disaster, climatic event, animal or plant diseases or pest infestations, any insurance indemnification received in respect of harvest insurance actions covered by Section 7 of Chapter III, or equivalent actions managed by the producer organisation or its producer members, due to those causes may be included in the value of marketed production.’; |
(4) |
in Article 30, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: ‘2. Producer organisations or associations of producer organisations which have been granted the support provided in Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 or Article 19 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 (*2) may implement an operational programme in the same period provided that the Member State concerned ensures that the beneficiaries receive support for any given action only under one scheme. (*2) Commission Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 of 25 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 193, 1.7.2014, p. 1).’;" |
(5) |
in the first subparagraph of Article 31(6), the first sentence is replaced by the following: ‘Investments, including those under leasing contracts, may be financed through the operational fund in one amount or in instalments that were approved in the operational programme.’; |
(6) |
in Chapter III of Title II, Section 3 is replaced by the following: ‘
Article 40 Support related to mutual funds 1. Member States shall adopt detailed provisions concerning support for the administrative cost of setting up mutual funds and the replenishment of mutual funds, as referred to in point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 33(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. 2. The support for the administrative cost of setting up mutual funds referred to in paragraph 1 shall comprise both the Union financial assistance and the contribution from the producer organisation. The total amount of that support shall not exceed 5 %, 4 % or 2 % of the contribution of the producer organisation to the mutual fund in the first, second and third year of its operation, respectively. 3. A producer organisation may receive the support for the administrative cost of setting up mutual funds referred to in paragraph 1, only once and only within the three first years of the operation of the mutual fund. Where a producer organisation only asks for that support in the second or the third year of operation of the mutual funds, the support shall be 4 % or 2 % of the contribution of the producer organisation to the mutual fund in the second and third year of its operation, respectively. 4. Member States may fix ceilings for the amounts that may be received by a producer organisation as a support related to mutual funds.’; |
(7) |
in Chapter III of Title II, the following Section 8 is added: ‘
Article 51a Implementation of coaching measures 1. For the purposes of Article 33(3)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the following coaching measures shall be eligible for support:
2. The coaching provider shall be the association of producer organisations or the producer organisation. The coaching provider shall be the beneficiary of the support for coaching measures. 3. The coaching recipient shall be a recognised producer organisation or a producer group located in regions with an organisation rate lower than 20 %, for the three consecutive years preceding the implementation of the operational programme. Individual producers, non-members of a producer organisation or their associations, may be coaching recipients even if they are located in regions with organisation rate above 20 %. 4. The expenditure related to coaching shall be part of the crisis prevention and management measures of the operational programme referred to in Article 33(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. Eligible costs related to coaching are listed in Annex III to this Regulation. All costs identified in Annex III shall be paid to the coaching provider. 5. Coaching measures shall not be outsourced.’; |
(8) |
Article 52 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 52 Conditions for the application of national financial assistance 1. For the purposes of Article 35(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the degree of organisation of producers in a region of a Member State shall be calculated on the basis of the value of fruit and vegetables produced in the region concerned and marketed by:
For the purpose of the calculation, the value established as referred to in the first subparagraph shall be divided by the total value of the fruit and vegetables produced in that region. 2. The value of fruit and vegetables produced in the region concerned and marketed by the organisations, associations and groups referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 shall only include those products for which those organisations, associations and groups are recognised. Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis. For the calculation of the total value of the fruit and vegetables produced in that region, the methodology set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 138/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*3) shall apply mutatis mutandis. 3. Only fruit and vegetables produced in the region referred to in paragraph 4 shall benefit from national financial assistance. 4. Member States shall define the regions as a distinct part of their territory in accordance with objective and non-discriminatory criteria, such as their agronomic and economic characteristics and their regional agricultural/fruit and vegetable potential, or their institutional or administrative structure and for which data are available in order to calculate the degree of organisation referred to in paragraph 1. The regions defined by a Member State shall not be amended at least for five years unless such amendment is objectively justified, in particular for reasons that are not related to the calculation of the degree of organisation of producers in the region or regions concerned. 5. Before granting national financial assistance, Member States shall notify the Commission of the list of the region(s) that meet the criteria referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, and of the amount of national financial assistance to be granted to the producer organisations in those regions. Member States shall notify the Commission of any amendment of the region(s) that meet the criteria referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. (*3) Regulation (EC) No 138/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 December 2003 on the economic accounts for agriculture in the Community (OJ L 33, 5.2.2004, p. 1).’;" |
(9) |
Article 56 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 56 Indicators 1. The operational programmes and the national strategies shall be subject to monitoring and evaluation aimed at assessing the progress made in achieving the objectives set in the operational programmes, as well as their efficiency and the effectiveness in relation to those objectives. 2. Progress, efficiency and effectiveness referred to in paragraph 1 shall be assessed throughout the implementation of the operational programme on the basis of indicators, set out in Section 4 of Annex II to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892, relating to actions and measures implemented by recognised producer organisations, associations of producer organisations, transnational associations of producer organisations and producer groups during the operational programmes.’; |
(10) |
Article 57 is modified as follows:
|
(11) |
Annex II, III and V are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation. |
Article 2
Transitional provisions
Without prejudice to Article 34 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/891, an operational programme approved under Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 (4) or Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 before 20 January 2018 shall continue to operate until its end under the conditions applicable before 1 January 2018.
However, at the request of a producer organisation or association of producer organisations, Member States may approve amendments of operational programme approved under Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 or Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 before 20 January 2018. Those amendments shall comply with the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2017/2393, of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 as amended by Article 1 of this Regulation and of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1146 (5).
Article 3
Entry into force and application
This Regulation shall enter into force the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall apply from 1 January 2018.
However, points (8), (9) and (10) of Article 1 and point (3) of the Annex shall apply from 1 January 2019.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 7 June 2018.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude JUNCKER
(1) OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.
(2) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 of 13 March 2017 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors and supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to penalties to be applied in those sectors and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 (OJ L 138, 25.5.2017, p. 4).
(3) Regulation (EU) 2017/2393 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2017 amending Regulations (EU) No 1305/2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), (EU) No 1306/2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy, (EU) No 1307/2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy, (EU) No 1308/2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and (EU) No 652/2014 laying down provisions for the management of expenditure relating to the food chain, animal health and animal welfare, and relating to plant health and plant reproductive material (OJ L 350, 29.12.2017, p. 15).
(4) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1).
(5) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1146 of 7 June 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors and Regulation (EC) No 606/2009 laying down certain detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 as regards the categories of grapevine products, oenological practices and the applicable restrictions (see page 9 of this Official Journal).
ANNEX
The Annexes to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 are amended as follows:
(1) |
Annex II is amended as follows:
|
(2) |
in Annex III, the following new points 12, 13 and 14 are added:
|
(3) |
Annex V is replaced by the following: ‘ANNEX V Information to be included in the annual report of Member States as referred to in Article 54(b) All information shall relate to the calendar year being reported on. It shall cover information on checks executed and administrative penalties applied in respect of that. As regards the information that varies during the year the annual report should reflect the state of play on 31 December of the year reported on. PART A — INFORMATION FOR MARKET MANAGEMENT
PART B — INFORMATION FOR THE CLEARANCE OF ACCOUNTS Information on checks and administrative penalties:
|
17.8.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 208/9 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1146
of 7 June 2018
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors and Regulation (EC) No 606/2009 laying down certain detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 as regards the categories of grapevine products, oenological practices and the applicable restrictions
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 38, Article 182(1) and (4) and Article 223 thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agriculture policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (2), and in particular Article 62(2) thereof
Whereas:
(1) |
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 (3) establishes rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 with regard to the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors. Regulation (EU) 2017/2393 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) has amended Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 in particular as regards the aid in the fruit and vegetables sector. Therefore, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 should reflect the amendments to the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
(2) |
Implementing rules regarding national financial assistance in the fruit and vegetables sector should be updated. |
(3) |
Details for implementation of the increase of the limit of Union financial assistance from 50 % to 60 % in Member States where producer organisations market less than 20 % of fruit and vegetables production referred to in Article 34(3)(f) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and in particular the details of the calculation of the degree of organisation of producers in a Member State should be laid down to ensure that the applications for aid and the verification of the conditions for the increase are implemented coherently throughout the Union. |
(4) |
It should also be clarified that promotion of the products as a crisis measure includes diversifying and consolidating the fruit and vegetables markets. |
(5) |
Provisions relating to annual reports on producer organisations, associations of producers organisations, including transnational organisations, and producer groups, and on operational funds, operational programmes and recognition plans should be simplified. These reports should enable the Commission to adequately monitor the sector. |
(6) |
Conditions for the application of the import duties referred to in Article 182 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 which may apply to imports of certain fruit and vegetables should be clarified. |
(7) |
Where an association of producer organisations or transnational association of producer organisation implements an operational programme Member States should ensure that double funding is avoided, and that appropriate checks are carried out for the actions implemented at the level of the association of producer organisations as well as at the level of its producer organisation members, as required under Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. |
(8) |
Annexes I and II to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 should be updated to simplify Part A of the Annual Report of Member States, common performance indicators and to remove the common baseline indicators. |
(9) |
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
(10) |
Point 3 of Section A of Part I of Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 sets out an obligation for Member States to notify the Commission of any increase in the limits laid down in point 2 of that section. Commission Regulation (EC) No 606/2009 (5) should be amended to provide for the details concerning the submission of this information by Member States to the Commission. |
(11) |
This Regulation should apply from the same day as Regulation (EU) 2017/2393. However, provisions that concern reporting should apply from 1 January 2019 to give Member States and the economic operators concerned sufficient time to implement the amendments set out in this Regulation. The flexibility for producer organisations provided for by the new measures and actions should apply brought by the transitional provisions must be implemented together with retroactivity in order to coincide with the application date of Regulation (EU) 2017/2393 so that the application of the amendments in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 is respected. |
(12) |
The conditions for the application of the new measures and actions eligible for Union financial assistance set out in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 should apply from the date of application of the amendments to that Regulation introduced by Regulation (EU) 2017/2393 to ensure market stability for producer organisations and their members, in particular given that those measures concern mainly crisis management and prevention and to enable them to fully benefit from the new measures. To safeguard legitimate expectations, producer organisations may choose to continue their operational programmes under the previous legal framework or to modify their operational programmes to benefit from the new measures and actions eligible for Union financial assistance as set out in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
(13) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Amendments to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 is amended as follows:
(1) |
The following new Article 8a is inserted: ‘Article 8a Implementation of increase of the limit of the Union financial assistance from 50 % to 60 % 1. The increase of the limit of the Union financial assistance from 50 % to 60 % for an operational programme or part of an operational programme of a recognised producer organisation as referred to in Article 34(3)(f) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be granted if:
2. For the purposes of the increase of the limit of the Union financial assistance from 50 % to 60 % for an operational programme or part of it, the rate of marketing of fruit and vegetable production by producer organisations referred to in Article 34(3)(f) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall be calculated for each year of the duration of operational programme, as a portion of the value of production marketed by producer organisations in a given Member State, of the total value of the production of fruit and vegetables marketed in the given Member State for the reference period set out in Article 23(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891. However, Member States applying the alternative method set out in Article 23(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 shall calculate the rate of marketing of fruit and vegetable production by producer organisations referred to in Article 34(3)(f) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 for each year of the duration of operational programme, as a portion of the value of production marketed by producer organisations in a given Member State, of the total value of the production of fruit and vegetables marketed in the given Member State for the period from 1 January until 31 December of the year preceding the year in which the aid is approved according to Article 8 of this Regulation. 3. Member States shall notify the requesting producer organisation of the approved amount of aid, including the amount of the increase granted pursuant to Article 34(3)(f) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, at the latest by 15 December of the year preceding the implementation of the operational programme, as set out in Article 8 of this Regulation. 4. Member States shall verify each year of the duration of the operational programme that the conditions for increase of the limit of the Union financial assistance from 50 % to 60 % as referred to in Article 34(3)(f) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 are met.’; |
(2) |
In Article 4, paragraph (1)(a) is amended as follows:
|
(3) |
In Article 9, paragraphs 6 and 7 are replaced by the following: ‘6. Producer organisations shall submit an application for aid regarding actions that are implemented at the level of the producer organisations in the Member State where they are recognised. If they are members of a transnational association of producer organisations, the producer organisations shall provide the Member State where the transnational association of producer organisations has its headquarters with a copy of the application. 7. Transnational associations of producer organisations shall submit an application for aid regarding actions implemented at the level of the transnational association in the Member State where that association has its headquarters. Member States shall ensure that there is no double funding risk.’; |
(4) |
In Article 14, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘1. Member States shall adopt provisions on the conditions to be fulfilled by promotion and communication measures, including actions and activities aimed at diversification and consolidation on the fruit and vegetable markets, whether those measures relate to crisis prevention or crisis management. Those provisions shall allow for the rapid application of the measures when required. The principal aim of those measures shall be enhancing the competitiveness of the products marketed by the producer organisations and their associations in the case of serious market disturbance, loss of consumer confidence or other related problems. The specific objectives of the promotion and communication measures implemented by the producer organisations and their associations shall be:
|
(5) |
Chapter III is deleted; |
(6) |
Article 21 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 21 Information and annual reports from producer groups, producer organisations and associations of producer organisations and annual reports from Member States At the request of a competent authority of a Member State, producer groups formed pursuant to Article 125e of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, recognised producer organisations, associations of producer organisations, transnational associations of producer organisations and producer groups shall provide any relevant information needed for drawing up of the annual report referred to in Article 54(b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891.The structure of the annual report is set out in Annex II to this Regulation. Member States shall take the measures necessary to gather information on the number of members, the volume and the value of marketed production of producer organisations which have not submitted operational programmes. Producer organisations and producer groups referred to in Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 shall be requested to provide the number of members, the volume and the value of the marketed production.’; |
(7) |
In Article 33, paragraphs 3 and 4 are replaced by the following: ‘3. The Member State in which the transnational association of producer organisations has its head office shall:
4. The actions of the operational programmes shall comply with the national rules and with the national strategy of the Member State where, in accordance with Article 9, paragraphs 6 and 7, the application for aid is submitted. However, environmental and phytosanitary measures and crisis prevention and management measures shall be subject to the rules of the Member State where these measures and actions are actually carried out.’; |
(8) |
In Article 39, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘1. An additional import duty as referred to in Article 182(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 may be applied to the products and during the periods listed in Annex VII to this Regulation. That additional import duty shall apply if the quantity of any of the products put into free circulation for any of the periods of application set out in that Annex exceeds the trigger volume for that product unless the imports are unlikely to disturb the Union market, or the effects of the additional import duty would be disproportionate to the intended objective.’; |
(9) |
Annexes I and II are replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation. |
Article 2
Amendment to Regulation (EC) No 606/2009
In Regulation (EC) No 606/2009 the following new Article 12a is inserted:
‘Article 12a
Notifications of Member States' decisions allowing an increase in natural alcoholic strength
1. Member States deciding to make use of the possibility to allow an increase in the natural alcoholic strength by volume pursuant to Point 3 of Section A of Part I of Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 shall notify the Commission of this before they adopt the decision. In the notification the Member States shall specify the percentages by which the limits laid down in Point 2 of Section A of Part I of Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 have been raised, the regions and the varieties concerned by the decision and submit data and evidence showing that the climatic conditions have been exceptionally unfavourable in the regions concerned.
2. The notification shall be made in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1183 (*1) and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1185 (*2).
3. The notification shall be communicated by the Commission to the authorities of the other Member States through the information system put in place by the Commission.
Article 3
Entry into force and application
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall apply from 1 January 2018.
However, points (5), (6) and (9) of Article 1 shall apply from 1 January 2019.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 7 June 2018.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude JUNCKER
(1) OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.
(2) OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 549.
(3) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 of 13 March 2017 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (OJ L 138, 25.5.2017, p. 57).
(4) Regulation (EU) 2017/2393 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2017 amending Regulations (EU) No 1305/2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), (EU) No 1306/2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy, (EU) No 1307/2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy, (EU) No 1308/2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and (EU) No 652/2014 laying down provisions for the management of expenditure relating to the food chain, animal health and animal welfare, and relating to plant health and plant reproductive material (OJ L 350, 29.12.2017, p. 15).
(5) Commission Regulation (EC) No 606/2009 of 10 July 2009 laying down certain detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 as regards the categories of grapevine products, oenological practices and the applicable restrictions (OJ L 193, 24.7.2009, p. 1).
ANNEX
‘ANNEX I
Structure and content of a national strategy for sustainable operational programmes as referred to in Article 2
1. Duration of the national strategy
To be indicated by the Member State.
2. Analysis of the situation in terms of strengths and weaknesses and potential for development, the strategy chosen to meet them and the justification of the priorities chosen as referred to in Article 36(2)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
2.1. Analysis of the situation
Description of the current situation of the fruit and vegetable sector using quantified data, highlighting strengths and weaknesses, disparities, needs and gaps and potential for development on the basis of the relevant indicators set out in Table 4.1 of Annex II. This description shall concern at least:
— |
the performances of the fruit and vegetables sector: strengths and weaknesses of the sector, competitiveness and the potential for development of the producer organisations; |
— |
the environmental effects (impacts, pressures and benefits) of the fruit and vegetables production, including key trends. |
2.2. The strategy chosen to meet strengths and weaknesses
Description of the key areas where intervention is expected to bring the maximum value added:
— |
relevance of the objectives set for the operational programmes, of the expected results and the extent to which they can be realistically achieved; |
— |
internal coherence of the strategy, existence of mutually reinforcing interactions and possible conflicts or contradictions between the operational objectives of different actions selected; |
— |
complementarity and consistency of the actions selected with other national or regional actions, and with activities supported through Union funds, in particular with the rural development and promotion programmes; |
— |
expected results and impact compared to the baseline situation and their contribution to Union objectives. |
2.3. Impact from the previous national strategy (where applicable)
Description of results and impact of operational programmes implemented in the recent past.
3. Objectives of operational programmes and performance indicators as referred to in Article 36(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Description of the types of actions selected as eligible for support (non-exhaustive list), the objectives pursued, the verifiable targets and the indicators that allow the progress towards achievement of the objectives, efficiency and effectiveness to be assessed.
3.1. Requirements concerning all or several types of actions
Member States shall ensure that all the actions included in the national strategy and in the national framework are verifiable and controllable. Where the assessment during the implementation of the operational programmes reveals that the requirements of verifiability and controllability are not met, the actions concerned shall be adjusted accordingly or deleted. Where support is granted on the basis of standard flat rates or scales of unit costs, Member States shall ensure that the relevant calculations are adequate and accurate and established in advance on the basis of a fair, equitable and verifiable calculation. Environmental actions shall comply with the requirements set out in Article 33(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
Member States shall adopt safeguards, provisions and checks for ensuring that actions selected as eligible for support are not also supported by other relevant instruments of the common agricultural policy, in particular by rural development and promotion programmes or other national or regional schemes. Effective safeguards in place pursuant to Article 33(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, to protect the environment from possible increased pressures coming from investments supported under operational programmes, and eligibility criteria adopted pursuant to Article 36(1) of that Regulation, for ensuring that investments on individual holdings supported under operational programmes respect the objectives set out in Article 191 TFEU and in the seventh Union environment action programme.
3.2. Specific information required for types of actions aimed at the attainment of the objectives set out or referred to in Article 33(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 (to be filled only for the types of actions selected).
3.2.1. Acquisition of fixed assets
— |
types of investments eligible for support, |
— |
other forms of acquisition eligible for support, e.g. renting, leasing, |
— |
details on eligibility conditions for support. |
3.2.2. Other actions
— |
description of the types of actions eligible for support, |
— |
details on eligibility conditions for support. |
4. Designation of competent authorities and responsible bodies
Designation by the Member State of the national authority responsible for the management, monitoring and evaluation of the national strategy.
5. A description of the monitoring and evaluation systems
The performance indicators set out by the national strategy shall comprise the indicators provided for in Article 4 and listed in Table 4.1 of Annex II. Where deemed appropriate, the national strategy shall specify additional indicators reflecting national or regional needs, conditions and objectives specific to the national operational programmes.
5.1. Assessment of the operational programmes and reporting obligations for producer organisations as referred to in Article 36(2)(d) and (e) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
Description of the monitoring and evaluation requirements and procedures in relation to operational programmes, including the reporting obligations for producer organisations.
5.2. Monitoring and evaluation of the national strategy
Description of the monitoring and evaluation requirements and procedures in relation to the national strategy.
‘ANNEX II
Annual Report Part A
STRUCTURE OF THE ANNUAL REPORT – PART A
These forms constitute the part A of the annual report that the competent authorities of the Member States are required to transmit to the European Commission by 15 November each year in the year following the calendar year covered by the report.
These forms are based on the reporting requirements set out in Article 54(b) and in Annex V to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891, laying down detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors.
1. Administrative information
Table 1.1. |
Changes to national legislation adopted to implement Section 3 of Chapter II of Title I and Sections 1, 2 and 3 of Chapter III of Title II of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 (for the fruit and vegetables sector) |
Table 1.2. |
Changes relating to the national strategy for sustainable operational programmes applicable to operational programmes |
2. Information on producer organisations, transnational producer organisations, associations of producer organisations, transnational association of producer organisations and producer groups
Table 2.1. |
Producer organisations |
Table 2.2. |
Transnational producer organisations |
Table 2.3. |
Associations of producer organisations |
Table 2.4. |
Transnational associations of producer organisations |
Table 2.5. |
Producer groups |
3. Information related to expenditures
Table 3.1. |
Expenditures related to producer organisations, transnational producer organisations, associations of producer organisations and transnational associations of producer organisations |
Table 3.2. |
Total expenditures of operational programmes for producer organisations, transnational producer organisations, associations of producer organisations and transnational associations of producer organisations |
Table 3.3. |
Total expenditures for producer groups |
Table 3.4. |
Withdrawals |
4. Monitoring of operational programmes/recognition plans
Table 4.1. |
Indicators as regards producer organisations and transnational producer organisations, associations of producer organisations and transnational associations of producer associations |
Table 4.2. |
Indicators for producer groups |
Explanatory notes
Abbreviations
Common market organisation |
CMO |
Producer group |
PG |
Producer organisation |
PO |
Transnational producer organisation |
TPO |
Association of producers organisation |
APO |
Transnational association of producers organisation |
TAPO |
Operational fund |
OF |
Operational programme |
OP |
Value of marketed production |
VMP |
Member State |
MS |
Country codes
Country name (source language) |
Short name (English) |
Code |
Belgique/België |
Belgium |
BE |
България (*1) |
Bulgaria |
BG |
Česká republika |
Czech Republic |
CZ |
Danmark |
Denmark |
DK |
Deutschland |
Germany |
DE |
Eesti |
Estonia |
EE |
Éire/Ireland |
Ireland |
IE |
Ελλάδα (*1) |
Greece |
EL |
España |
Spain |
ES |
France |
France |
FR |
Italia |
Italy |
IT |
Κύπρος (*1) |
Cyprus |
CY |
Latvija |
Latvia |
LV |
Lietuva |
Lithuania |
LT |
Luxembourg |
Luxembourg |
LU |
Magyarország |
Hungary |
HU |
Malta |
Malta |
MT |
Nederland |
Netherlands |
NL |
Österreich |
Austria |
AT |
Polska |
Poland |
PL |
Portugal |
Portugal |
PT |
Republika Hrvatska |
Croatia |
HR |
România |
Romania |
RO |
Slovenija |
Slovenia |
SI |
Slovensko |
Slovakia |
SK |
Suomi/Finland |
Finland |
FI |
Sverige |
Sweden |
SE |
United Kingdom |
United Kingdom |
UK |
Region codes
Vlaams Gewest |
BE2 |
Région Wallonne |
BE3 |
The indication of the region concerned on the cover page of each section and at the beginning of each table is an option for any Member State that finds it more appropriate to provide a regional breakdown.
Code number (ID) of POs, TPOs, APOs, TAPOs and PGs
The code number of each PO, TPO, APO, TAPO or PG is UNIQUE. If a PO, TPO, APO, TAPO or PG has its recognition withdrawn, the same code number should never be used again.
Monetary values
All monetary values should be expressed in euro, except for those Member States that use a national currency. A “NATIONAL CURRENCY” box is present at the TOP of Tables.
Currency |
|
The box should indicate the code of the national currency used.
|
CODE |
Euro |
EUR |
Pound sterling |
GBP |
Contact point for communication
Member State: |
|
Year: |
|
Region: |
|
|
|
Organisation |
Name |
|
Postal address |
|
|
Contact person 1 |
Family name |
|
First name |
|
|
Job Title |
|
|
Email address |
|
|
Business phone |
|
|
Business fax |
|
|
Contact person 2 |
Family name |
|
First name |
|
|
Job Title |
|
|
Email address |
|
|
Business phone |
|
|
Business fax |
|
Annual Report – Part A
Member State: |
|
Year: |
|
Region: |
|
|
|
SECTION 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Table 1.1. Changes to national legislation adopted in order to implement Section 3 of Chapter II of Title I of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 (for the fruit and vegetables sector)
National legislation |
||
Title |
Publication in the OJ of the Member State |
Hyperlink |
|
|
|
Table 1.2. Changes to the national strategy for sustainable operational programmes applicable to operational programmes
National strategy |
|
Changes to the national strategy (1) |
Hyperlink |
|
|
Annual Report – Part A
Member State: |
|
Year: |
|
Region: |
|
|
|
SECTION 2
INFORMATION RELATED TO POs, TPOs, APOs, TAPOs AND PGs
Table 2.1. Producer organisations
Total number of recognised POs |
|
||||
Total number of suspended POs |
|
||||
Total number of POs for which the recognition was withdrawn |
|
||||
Total number of POs that merged with another (or more) PO(s)/APO(s)/TPO(s)/TAPO(s) |
Total number of POs concerned |
|
|||
Total number of new PO(s)/APO(s)/TPO(s)/TAPO(s) |
|
||||
New ID number(s) |
|
||||
Number of members of POs |
Total |
|
|||
Legal entities |
|
||||
Natural persons |
|
||||
Number of fruit and/or vegetable producers |
|
||||
Total number of POs implementing an operational programme |
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Part of the production intended for the fresh market |
Value |
|
|||
Volume (tonnes) |
|
||||
Part of the production intended for processing |
Value |
|
|||
Volume (tonnes) |
|
||||
Total area under fruit and vegetables production (ha) (*2) |
|
Table 2.2. Transnational producer organisations (2)
Total number of recognised TPOs |
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
Total number of suspended TPOs |
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
Total number of TPOs for which the recognition was withdrawn |
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
Total number of TPOs that merged with another (or more) TPO(s)/TAPO(s) |
Total number of TPOs concerned |
|
||||
Total number of new TPO(s)/TAPO(s) |
|
|||||
New ID number(s) |
|
|||||
Number of members of TPOs |
Total |
|
||||
Legal entities |
|
|||||
Natural persons |
|
|||||
Number of fruit and/or vegetable producers |
|
|||||
Total number of TPOs implementing an operational programme |
|
with entire OP |
|
|||
with partial OP |
|
|||||
|
with entire OP |
|
||||
with partial OP |
|
|||||
|
with entire OP |
|
||||
with partial OP |
|
|||||
Part of the production intended for the fresh market |
Value |
|
||||
Volume (tonnes) |
|
|||||
Part of the production intended for processing |
Value |
|
||||
Volume (tonnes) |
|
|||||
Total area under fruit and vegetables production (ha) (*3) |
|
Table 2.3. Associations of producer organisations (3)
Total number of recognised APOs |
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
Total number of suspended APOs |
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
Total number of APOs for which the recognition was withdrawn |
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
Total number of APOs that merged with another (or more) APO(s)/TAPO(s) |
Total number of APOs concerned |
|
||||
Total number of new APO(s)/TAPO(s) |
|
|||||
New ID number(s) |
|
|||||
Number of members of APOs |
Total |
|
||||
Legal entities |
|
|||||
Natural persons |
|
|||||
Number of fruit and/or vegetable producers |
|
|||||
Total number of APOs implementing an operational programme |
|
with entire OP |
|
|||
with partial OP |
|
|||||
|
with entire OP |
|
||||
with partial OP |
|
|||||
|
with entire OP |
|
||||
with partial OP |
|
|||||
Part of the production intended for the fresh market |
Value |
|
||||
Volume (tonnes) |
|
|||||
Part of the production intended for processing |
Value |
|
||||
Volume (tonnes) |
|
|||||
Total area under fruit and vegetables production (ha) (*4) |
|
Table 2.4. Transnational associations of producer organisations (4)
Total number of recognised TAPOs |
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
Total number of suspended TAPOs |
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
Total number of TAPOs for which the recognition was withdrawn |
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
Total number of TAPOs that merged with another (or more) TAPO(s) |
Total number of TAPO(s) concerned |
|
||||
Total number of new TAPO(s) |
|
|||||
New ID number(s) |
|
|||||
Number of members of TAPOs |
Total |
|
||||
Legal entities |
|
|||||
Natural persons |
|
|||||
Number of fruit and/or vegetable producers |
|
|||||
Total number of TAPOs implementing an operational programme |
|
with entire OP |
|
|||
with partial OP |
|
|||||
|
with entire OP |
|
||||
with partial OP |
|
|||||
|
with entire OP |
|
||||
with partial OP |
|
|||||
Part of the production intended for the fresh market |
Value |
|
||||
Volume (tonnes) |
|
|||||
Part of the production intended for processing |
Value |
|
||||
Volume (tonnes) |
|
|||||
Total area under fruit and vegetables production (ha) (*5) |
|
Table 2.5. Producer groups
Total number of recognised PGs |
|
|
Total number of suspended PGs |
|
|
Total number of PGs for which the recognition was withdrawn |
|
|
Total number of PGs which have become POs |
|
|
Total number of PGs that merged with another (or more) PG(s) |
Total number of PGs concerned |
|
Total number of new PGs |
|
|
New ID number(s) |
|
|
Number of members of PGs |
Total |
|
Legal entities |
|
|
Natural persons |
|
|
Number of fruit and/or vegetable producers |
|
|
Part of the production intended for the fresh market |
Value |
|
Volume (tonnes) |
|
|
Part of the production intended for processing |
Value |
|
Volume (tonnes) |
|
|
Total area under fruit and vegetables production (ha) (*6) |
|
Annual Report – Part A
Member State: |
|
Year: |
|
Region: |
|
|
|
SECTION 3
EXPENDITURES INFORMATION
Table 3.1. Expenditures related to POs, TPOs, APOs and TAPOs
|
All POs |
All TPOs |
All APOs |
All TAPOs |
||
Operational Fund |
Total approved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Final Operational Fund |
Total spent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
National financial assistance |
Amount of the National financial assistance actually paid |
|
|
|||
Estimated amount of the National financial assistance actually paid to be reimbursed by the EU |
|
|||||
List of the beneficiary regions under Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 |
|
|||||
Value of marketed production (calculated in accordance with Article 22 of Regulation (EU) 2017/891) |
|
|
|
|
(Data in Euro or national currency)
Table 3.2. Total actual expenditures of operational programmes for POs, TPOs, APOs and TAPOs
Actions/Measures Article 2(f)and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/891 |
Objectives Articles 33(1) and (3) and 152(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 |
Total actual expenditures (Euro or national currency) |
|||||
All POs |
All TPOs |
All APOs |
All TAPOs |
||||
Investments |
Planning of production |
|
|
|
|
||
Improvement of product quality |
|
|
|
|
|||
Boosting products' commercial value |
|
|
|
|
|||
Environmental measures |
|
|
|
|
|||
Crisis prevention and management |
|
|
|
|
|||
Research |
|
|
|
|
|||
Research and experimental production |
Planning of production |
|
|
|
|
||
Improvement of product quality |
|
|
|
|
|||
Boosting products' commercial value |
|
|
|
|
|||
Environmental measures |
|
|
|
|
|||
Quality schemes (EU and national) and measures related to quality improvement |
Improvement of product quality |
|
|
|
|
||
Promotion and communications |
Boosting products' commercial value |
|
|
|
|
||
Promotion of the products |
|
|
|
|
|||
Crisis prevention and management |
|
|
|
|
|||
Training and exchange of best practices |
Planning of production |
|
|
|
|
||
Improvement of product quality |
|
|
|
|
|||
Boosting products' commercial value |
|
|
|
|
|||
Environmental measures |
|
|
|
|
|||
Crisis prevention and management |
|
|
|
|
|||
Advisory services and technical assistance |
Planning of production |
|
|
|
|
||
Improvement of product quality |
|
|
|
|
|||
Boosting products' commercial value |
|
|
|
|
|||
Environmental measures |
|
|
|
|
|||
Organic production |
Environmental measures |
|
|
|
|
||
Integrated production |
|
|
|
|
|||
Improved use or management of water, including water saving and drainage |
|
|
|
|
|||
Actions to conserve soil |
|
|
|
|
|||
Actions to create or maintain habitat favourable for biodiversity or to maintain the landscape, including the conservation of historical features |
|
|
|
|
|||
Actions favouring energy saving (excluding transport) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Action related to reduction of waste production and to improve waste management |
|
|
|
|
|||
Transport |
|
|
|
|
|||
Marketing |
|
|
|
|
|||
Setting-up mutual funds |
Crisis prevention and management |
|
|
|
|
||
Replenishment of mutual funds |
|
|
|
|
|||
Replanting of orchards |
|
|
|
|
|||
Market withdrawal |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Green-harvesting |
|
|
|
|
|||
Non-harvesting |
|
|
|
|
|||
Harvest insurance |
|
|
|
|
|||
Coaching |
|
|
|
|
|||
Administrative costs |
Planning of production |
|
|
|
|
||
Improvement of product quality |
|||||||
Boosting products' commercial value |
|||||||
Environmental measures |
|||||||
Crisis prevention and management |
|||||||
Research |
|||||||
Others |
Planning of production |
|
|
|
|
||
Improvement of product quality |
|
|
|
|
|||
Boosting products' commercial value |
|
|
|
|
|||
Environmental measures |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Table 3.3. Total actual expenditures for Producer Groups
|
Total actual expenditures for all PGs (Euro or national currency) |
||
PG investments |
Investments required to attain recognition for PGs |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Table 3.4. Withdrawals
|
Total annual volume (tonnes) |
Total expenditure (Euro or national currency) |
Amount of EU financial assistance |
Free distribution (tonnes) |
Composting (tonnes) |
Processing industry (tonnes) |
Other destination (tonnes) |
|
Products in Annex IV to Regulation (EU) 2017/891 |
Cauliflowers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tomatoes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apples |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grapes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apricots |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nectarines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peaches |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pears |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aubergines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Watermelons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oranges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandarins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clementines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satsumas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lemons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report – Part A
Member State: |
|
Year: |
|
Region: |
|
|
|
SECTION 4
MONITORING OF OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES
The indicators related to actions undertaken by recognised producer organisations, associations of producer organisations, transnational organisations and producer groups under an operational programme/recognition plan does not necessarily capture all the factors that may intervene and affect the outputs, results and impact of an operational programme/recognition plan. In this context, the information provided by the indicators should be interpreted in the light of quantitative and qualitative information relating to other key factors contributing to the success or failure of the programme/plan's implementation.
In case Member States use samples for the calculation of indicators, the size of the sample, its representativeness and its other constituting elements shall be communicated to the Commission services, together with the annual report.
Table 4.1. Indicators as regards POs, TPOs, APOs and TAPOs
Actions/Measures Article 2(f)and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/891 |
Objectives Articles 33(1) and (3) and 152(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 |
Indicators |
All POs |
All TPOs |
All APOs |
All TAPOs |
|
Investments (5) |
Planning of production |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
Total value |
|
|
|
|
|||
Improvement of product quality |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Total value |
|
|
|
|
|||
Boosting products' commercial value |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Total value |
|
|
|
|
|||
Total value of marketed production/Total volume of marketed production (Euro or national currency/kg) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Environmental measures |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Total value |
|
|
|
|
|||
Crisis prevention and management |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Total value |
|
|
|
|
|||
Research |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Total value |
|
|
|
|
|||
Research and experimental production |
Planning of production |
Total value |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Improvement of product quality |
Total value |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Boosting products' commercial value |
Total value |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Environmental measures |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Total value |
|
|
|
|
|||
Quality schemes (EU and national) (6) and measures related to quality improvement |
Improvement of product quality |
Area of PDO/PGI/TSG (7) (ha) |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Volume (tonnes) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Promotion and communications (8) |
Boosting products' commercial value |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of promotion campaigns |
|
|
|
|
|||
Promotion of the products |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of promotion campaigns |
|
|
|
|
|||
Crisis prevention and management |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of promotion campaigns |
|
|
|
|
|||
Training and exchange of best practices |
Planning of production |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of actions |
|
|
|
|
|||
Improvement of product quality |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of actions |
|
|
|
|
|||
Boosting products' commercial value |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of actions |
|
|
|
|
|||
Environmental measures |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of actions |
|
|
|
|
|||
Crisis prevention and management |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of actions |
|
|
|
|
|||
Advisory services and technical assistance |
Planning of production |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of actions |
|
|
|
|
|||
Improvement of product quality |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of actions |
|
|
|
|
|||
Boosting products' commercial value |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of actions |
|
|
|
|
|||
Environmental measures |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of actions |
|
|
|
|
|||
Organic production |
Environmental measures |
Area under organic production of fruit and/or vegetables (ha) |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Integrated production |
Area under integrated production of fruit and/or vegetables (ha) |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Improved use or management of water, including water saving and drainage |
Area under fruit and vegetable production subject to reduction in use of water (ha) |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Difference of volume (m3) (n – 1/n) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Actions to conserve soil |
Area under fruit and vegetable production at risk of soil erosion where anti-erosion measures are implemented (ha) (9) |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Difference of fertiliser use per ha (tonnes/ha) (n – 1/n) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Actions to create or maintain habitat favourable for biodiversity or to maintain the landscape, including the conservation of historical features |
Area concerned by actions contributing to habitat and biodiversity protection (ha) |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Actions favouring energy saving (excluding transport) |
Area under fruit and vegetable production subject to reduction in use of energy (ha) |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Difference of energy consumption (n – 1/n): |
|
||||||
Solids |
(tonnes/volume of marketed production) |
|
|
|
|
||
Liquids |
(L/volume of marketed production) |
|
|
|
|
||
Gas |
(m3/volume of marketed production) |
|
|
|
|
||
Electricity |
(kwh/volume of marketed production) |
|
|
|
|
||
Action related to reduction of waste production and to improve waste management |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Difference of volume of waste (m3/volume of marketed production) (n – 1/n) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Difference of volume of packaging (m3/volume of marketed production) (n – 1./n) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Transport |
Difference of energy consumption (n – 1./n): |
|
|
|
|
||
Liquids |
(L/volume of marketed production) |
|
|
|
|
||
Gas |
(m3/volume of marketed production) |
|
|
|
|
||
Electricity |
(kwh/volume of marketed production) |
|
|
|
|
||
Marketing |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Number of actions |
|
|
|
|
|||
Setting-up mutual funds (10) |
Crisis prevention and management |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
Replenishment of mutual funds (11) |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Replanting of orchards |
Areas concerned (ha) |
|
|
|
|
||
Market withdrawal (11) |
Number of actions undertaken |
|
|
|
|
||
Green-harvesting (12) |
Number of actions undertaken |
|
|
|
|
||
Area concerned (ha) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Non-harvesting (12) |
Number of actions undertaken |
|
|
|
|
||
Area concerned (ha) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Harvest insurance |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Coaching |
Number of actions undertaken |
|
|
|
|
||
Others |
Planning of production |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
Improvement of product quality |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Boosting products' commercial value |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
||
Environmental measures |
Number of holdings |
|
|
|
|
Table 4.2. Indicators as regards Producer Groups
|
Indicator |
Number |
|
PG investments |
Investments required to attain recognition for PGs |
Number of members of PGs |
|
Number of PGs which have been recognised as POs |
|
(*1) Latin transliteration: България = Bulgaria; Ελλάδα = Elláda; Κύπρος = Kýpros.
(1) Summary of the changes introduced to the national strategy during the year reported.
(*2) excluding mushrooms
(2) This table refers to Member States where the head offices of TPOs are located.
The total area refers to areas exploited by TPOs' members, namely POs, growers belonging to POs members to the TPO and growers members to the TPO.
(*3) excluding mushrooms
(3) This table refers to Member States where the head offices of APOs are located.
The total area refers to areas exploited by APOs' members, namely POs, growers belonging to POs members to the APOs.
(*4) excluding mushrooms
(4) This table refers to Member States where the head offices of TAPOs are located.
The total area refers to areas exploited by TAPOs' members, namely POs, growers belonging to POs members to the TAPOs.
(*5) excluding mushrooms
(*6) excluding mushrooms
(5) Including non-productive investments linked to the achievement of commitments undertaken under the operational programme.
(6) Refers to a set of detailed obligations concerning the production methods (a) the respect of which is subject to independent inspection, and (b) that result in a final product the quality of which (i) goes significantly beyond the normal commercial standards as regards public health, plant health or environmental standards and (ii) responds to current and foreseeable market opportunities. It is proposed that the main types of “quality schemes” cover the following: (a) certified organic production; (b) protected geographical indications and protected designations of origin, (c) certified integrated production, (d) private certified product quality schemes.
(7) Protected designations of origin/Protected Geographical Indications/Traditional Speciality Guaranteed
(8) Each day of a promotion/communication campaign counts as one action.
(9) “At risk of soil erosion” shall mean any sloping plot with an inclination higher than 10 %, whether or not anti-erosion measures (e.g. soil cover, crop rotation, etc.) have been taken. Where the relevant information is available, a Member State may instead use the following definition: “At risk of soil erosion” shall mean any plot with a predicted loss of soil exceeding the rate of natural soil formation, whether or not anti-erosion measures (e.g. soil cover or crop rotation) have been taken.
(10) Actions relating to the setting up/refilling of different mutual funds count as different actions.
(11) Market withdrawal of the same product in different periods of the year and market withdrawals of different products count as different actions. Each market withdrawal operation for a given product counts as one action.
(12) Green-harvesting and non-harvesting of different products count as different actions. Green harvesting and non-harvesting of the same product count as one action, regardless of the number of days they take, the number of holdings participating and the number of plots or hectares concerned.
DECISIONS
17.8.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 208/38 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2018/1147
of 10 August 2018
establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions for waste treatment, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
(notified under document C(2018) 5070)
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (1), and in particular Article 13(5) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Best available techniques (BAT) conclusions are the reference for setting permit conditions for installations covered by Chapter II of Directive 2010/75/EU and competent authorities should set emission limit values which ensure that, under normal operating conditions, emissions do not exceed the emission levels associated with the best available techniques as laid down in the BAT conclusions. |
(2) |
The forum composed of representatives of Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection, established by Commission Decision of 16 May 2011 (2), provided the Commission on 19 December 2017 with its opinion on the proposed content of the BAT reference document for waste treatment. That opinion is publicly available. |
(3) |
The BAT conclusions set out in the Annex to this Decision are the key element of that BAT reference document. |
(4) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 75(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The best available techniques (BAT) conclusions for waste treatment, as set out in the Annex, are adopted.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 10 August 2018.
For the Commission
Karmenu VELLA
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.
(2) Commission Decision of 16 May 2011 establishing a forum for the exchange of information pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (OJ C 146, 17.5.2011, p. 3).
ANNEX
BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES (BAT) CONCLUSIONS FOR WASTE
SCOPE
These BAT conclusions concern the following activities specified in Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU, namely:
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Referring to independently operated treatment of waste water not covered by Directive 91/271/EEC above, these BAT conclusions also cover the combined treatment of waste water from different origins if the main pollutant load originates from the activities covered under points 5.1, 5.3 or 5.5 as listed above.
These BAT conclusions do not address the following:
— |
Surface impoundment. |
— |
Disposal or recycling of animal carcases or of animal waste covered by the activity description in point 6.5 of Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU when this is covered by the BAT conclusions on the slaughterhouses and animal by-products industries (SA). |
— |
On-farm processing of manure when this is covered by the BAT conclusions for the intensive rearing of poultry or pigs (IRPP). |
— |
Direct recovery (i.e. without pretreatment) of waste as a substitute for raw materials in installations carrying out activities covered by other BAT conclusions, e.g.:
|
— |
Waste (co-)incineration, pyrolysis and gasification. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for waste incineration (WI) or the BAT conclusions for large combustion plants (LCP). |
— |
Landfill of waste. This is covered by Council Directive 1999/31/EC (2). In particular, underground permanent and long-term storage (≥ 1 year before disposal, ≥ 3 years before recovery) are covered by Directive 1999/31/EC. |
— |
In situ remediation of contaminated soil (i.e. unexcavated soil). |
— |
Treatment of slags and bottom ashes. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for waste incineration (WI) and/or the BAT conclusions for large combustion plants (LCP). |
— |
Smelting of scrap metals and metal-bearing materials. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for non-ferrous metals industries (NFM), the BAT conclusions for iron and steel production (IS), and/or the BAT conclusions for the smitheries and foundries industry (SF). |
— |
Regeneration of spent acids and alkalis when this is covered by the BAT conclusions for ferrous metals processing. |
— |
Combustion of fuels when it does not generate hot gases which come into direct contact with the waste. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for large combustion plants (LCP) or by Directive (EU) 2015/2193 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3). |
Other BAT conclusions and reference documents which could be relevant for the activities covered by these BAT conclusions are the following:
— |
Economics and cross-media effects (ECM); |
— |
Emissions from storage (EFS); |
— |
Energy efficiency (ENE); |
— |
Monitoring of emissions to air and water from IED installations (ROM); |
— |
Production of cement, lime and magnesium oxide (CLM); |
— |
Common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector (CWW); |
— |
Intensive rearing of poultry or pigs (IRPP). |
These BAT conclusions apply without prejudice to the relevant provisions of EU legislation, e.g. the waste hierarchy.
DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of these BAT conclusions, the following definitions apply:
Term used |
Definition |
||||
General terms |
|||||
Channelled emissions |
Emissions of pollutants into the environment through any kind of duct, pipe, stack, etc. This also includes emissions from open-top biofilters. |
||||
Continuous measurement |
Measurement using an ‘automated measuring system’ permanently installed on site. |
||||
Declaration of cleanliness |
Written document provided by the waste producer/holder certifying that the empty waste packaging concerned (e.g. drums, containers) is clean with respect to the acceptance criteria. |
||||
Diffuse emissions |
Non-channelled emissions (e.g. of dust, organic compounds, odour) which can result from ‘area’ sources (e.g. tanks) or ‘point’ sources (e.g. pipe flanges). This also includes emissions from open-air windrow composting. |
||||
Direct discharge |
Discharge to a receiving water body without further downstream waste water treatment. |
||||
Emissions factors |
Numbers that can be multiplied by known data such as plant/process data or throughput data to estimate emissions. |
||||
Existing plant |
A plant that is not a new plant. |
||||
Flaring |
High-temperature oxidation to burn combustible compounds of waste gases from industrial operations with an open flame. Flaring is primarily used for burning off flammable gas for safety reasons or during non-routine operating conditions. |
||||
Fly ashes |
Particles from the combustion chamber or formed within the flue-gas stream, that are transported in the flue-gas. |
||||
Fugitive emissions |
Diffuse emissions from ‘point’ sources. |
||||
Hazardous waste |
Hazardous waste as defined in point 2 of Article 3 of Directive 2008/98/EC. |
||||
Indirect discharge |
Discharge which is not a direct discharge. |
||||
Liquid biodegradable waste |
Waste of biological origin with a relatively high water content (e.g. fat separator contents, organic sludges, catering waste). |
||||
Major plant upgrade |
A major change in the design or technology of a plant with major adjustments or replacements of the process and/or abatement technique(s) and associated equipment. |
||||
Mechanical biological treatment (MBT) |
Treatment of mixed solid waste combining mechanical treatment with biological treatment such as aerobic or anaerobic treatment. |
||||
New plant |
A plant first permitted at the site of the installation following the publication of these BAT conclusions or a complete replacement of a plant following the publication of these BAT conclusions. |
||||
Output |
The treated waste exiting the waste treatment plant. |
||||
Pasty waste |
Sludge which is not free-flowing. |
||||
Periodic measurement |
Measurement at specified time intervals using manual or automated methods. |
||||
Recovery |
Recovery as defined in Article 3(15) of Directive 2008/98/EC. |
||||
Re-refining |
Treatments carried out on waste oil to transform it to base oil. |
||||
Regeneration |
Treatments and processes mainly designed to make the treated materials (e.g. spent activated carbon or spent solvent) suitable again for a similar use. |
||||
Sensitive receptor |
Area which needs special protection, such as:
|
||||
Surface impoundment |
Placement of liquid or sludgy discards into pits, ponds, lagoons, etc. |
||||
Treatment of waste with calorific value |
Treatment of waste wood, waste oil, waste plastics, waste solvents, etc. to obtain a fuel or to allow a better recovery of its calorific value. |
||||
VFCs |
Volatile (hydro)fluorocarbons: VOCs consisting of fluorinated (hydro)carbons, in particular chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). |
||||
VHCs |
Volatile hydrocarbons: VOCs consisting entirely of hydrogen and carbon (e.g. ethane, propane, iso-butane, cyclopentane). |
||||
VOC |
Volatile organic compound as defined in Article 3(45) of Directive 2010/75/EU. |
||||
Waste holder |
Waste holder as defined in Article 3(6) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (4). |
||||
Waste input |
The incoming waste to be treated in the waste treatment plant. |
||||
Water-based liquid waste |
Waste consisting of aqueous liquids, acids/alkalis or pumpable sludges (e.g. emulsions, waste acids, aqueous marine waste) which is not liquid biodegradable waste. |
||||
Pollutants/parameters |
|||||
AOX |
Adsorbable organically bound halogens, expressed as Cl, include adsorbable organically bound chlorine, bromine and iodine. |
||||
Arsenic |
Arsenic, expressed as As, includes all inorganic and organic arsenic compounds, dissolved or bound to particles. |
||||
BOD |
Biochemical oxygen demand. Amount of oxygen needed for the biochemical oxidation of organic and/or inorganic matter in five (BOD5) or in seven (BOD7) days. |
||||
Cadmium |
Cadmium, expressed as Cd, includes all inorganic and organic cadmium compounds, dissolved or bound to particles. |
||||
CFCs |
Chlorofluorocarbons: VOCs consisting of carbon, chlorine and fluorine. |
||||
Chromium |
Chromium, expressed as Cr, includes all inorganic and organic chromium compounds, dissolved or bound to particles. |
||||
Hexavalent chromium |
Hexavalent chromium, expressed as Cr(VI), includes all chromium compounds where the chromium is in the oxidation state +6. |
||||
COD |
Chemical oxygen demand. Amount of oxygen needed for the total chemical oxidation of the organic matter to carbon dioxide. COD is an indicator for the mass concentration of organic compounds. |
||||
Copper |
Copper, expressed as Cu, includes all inorganic and organic copper compounds, dissolved or bound to particles. |
||||
Cyanide |
Free cyanide, expressed as CN-. |
||||
Dust |
Total particulate matter (in air). |
||||
HOI |
Hydrocarbon oil index. The sum of compounds extractable with a hydrocarbon solvent (including long-chain or branched aliphatic, alicyclic, aromatic or alkyl-substituted aromatic hydrocarbons). |
||||
HCl |
All inorganic gaseous chlorine compounds, expressed as HCl. |
||||
HF |
All inorganic gaseous fluorine compounds, expressed as HF. |
||||
H2S |
Hydrogen sulphide. Carbonyl sulphide and mercaptans are not included. |
||||
Lead |
Lead, expressed as Pb, includes all inorganic and organic lead compounds, dissolved or bound to particles. |
||||
Mercury |
Mercury, expressed as Hg, includes elementary mercury and all inorganic and organic mercury compounds, gaseous, dissolved or bound to particles. |
||||
NH3 |
Ammonia. |
||||
Nickel |
Nickel, expressed as Ni, includes all inorganic and organic nickel compounds, dissolved or bound to particles. |
||||
Odour concentration |
Number of European Odour Units (ouE) in one cubic metre at standard conditions measured by dynamic olfactometry according to EN 13725. |
||||
PCB |
Polychlorinated biphenyl. |
||||
Dioxin-like PCBs |
Polychlorinated biphenyls as listed in Commission Regulation (EC) No 199/2006 (5). |
||||
PCDD/F |
Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin/furan(s). |
||||
PFOA |
Perfluorooctanoic acid. |
||||
PFOS |
Perfluorooctanesulphonic acid. |
||||
Phenol index |
The sum of phenolic compounds, expressed as phenol concentration and measured according to EN ISO 14402. |
||||
TOC |
Total organic carbon, expressed as C (in water), includes all organic compounds. |
||||
Total N |
Total nitrogen, expressed as N, includes free ammonia and ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N), nitrite nitrogen (NO2-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) and organically bound nitrogen. |
||||
Total P |
Total phosphorus, expressed as P, includes all inorganic and organic phosphorus compounds, dissolved or bound to particles |
||||
TSS |
Total suspended solids. Mass concentration of all suspended solids (in water), measured via filtration through glass fibre filters and gravimetry. |
||||
TVOC |
Total volatile organic carbon, expressed as C (in air). |
||||
Zinc |
Zinc, expressed as Zn, includes all inorganic and organic zinc compounds, dissolved or bound to particles. |
For the purposes of these BAT conclusions, the following acronyms apply:
Acronym |
Definition |
EMS |
Environmental management system |
EoLVs |
End-of-life vehicles (as defined in Article 2(2) of Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (6)) |
HEPA |
High-efficiency particle air (filter) |
IBC |
Intermediate bulk container |
LDAR |
Leak detection and repair |
LEV |
Local exhaust ventilation system |
POP |
Persistent organic pollutant (as listed in Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7)) |
WEEE |
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (as defined in Article 3(1) of Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (8)) |
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Best Available Techniques
The techniques listed and described in these BAT conclusions are neither prescriptive nor exhaustive. Other techniques may be used that ensure at least an equivalent level of environmental protection.
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions are generally applicable.
Emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs) for emissions to air
Unless stated otherwise, emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs) for emissions to air given in these BAT conclusions refer to concentrations (mass of emitted substances per volume of waste gas) under the following standard conditions: dry gas at a temperature of 273,15 K and a pressure of 101,3 kPa, without correction for oxygen content, and expressed in μg/Nm3 or mg/Nm3.
For averaging periods of BAT-AELs for emissions to air, the following definitions apply.
Type of measurement |
Averaging period |
Definition |
Continuous |
Daily average |
Average over a period of one day based on valid hourly or half-hourly averages. |
Periodic |
Average over the sampling period |
Average value of three consecutive measurements of at least 30 minutes each (9). |
Where continuous measurement is used, the BAT-AELs may be expressed as daily averages.
Emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs) for emissions to water
Unless stated otherwise, emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs) for emissions to water given in these BAT conclusions refer to concentrations (mass of emitted substances per volume of water), expressed in μg/l or mg/l.
Unless stated otherwise, averaging periods associated with the BAT-AELs refer to either of the following two cases:
— |
in the case of continuous discharge, daily average values, i.e. 24-hour flow-proportional composite samples; |
— |
in the case of batch discharge, average values over the release duration taken as flow-proportional composite samples, or, provided that the effluent is appropriately mixed and homogeneous, a spot sample taken before discharge. |
Time-proportional composite samples can be used provided that sufficient flow stability is demonstrated.
All BAT-AELs for emissions to water apply at the point where the emission leaves the installation.
Abatement efficiency
The calculation of the average abatement efficiency referred to in these BAT conclusions (see Table 6.1) does not include, for COD and TOC, initial treatment steps aiming at separating the bulk organic content from the water-based liquid waste, such as evapo-condensation, emulsion breaking or phase separation.
1. GENERAL BAT CONCLUSIONS
1.1. Overall environmental performance
BAT 1. In order to improve the overall environmental performance, BAT is to implement and adhere to an environmental management system (EMS) that incorporates all of the following features:
I. |
commitment of the management, including senior management; |
II. |
definition, by the management, of an environmental policy that includes the continuous improvement of the environmental performance of the installation; |
III. |
planning and establishing the necessary procedures, objectives and targets, in conjunction with financial planning and investment; |
IV. |
implementation of procedures paying particular attention to:
|
V. |
checking performance and taking corrective action, paying particular attention to:
|
VI. |
review, by senior management, of the EMS and its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness; |
VII. |
following the development of cleaner technologies; |
VIII. |
consideration for the environmental impacts from the eventual decommissioning of the plant at the stage of designing a new plant, and throughout its operating life; |
IX. |
application of sectoral benchmarking on a regular basis; |
X. |
waste stream management (see BAT 2); |
XI. |
an inventory of waste water and waste gas streams (see BAT 3); |
XII. |
residues management plan (see description in Section 6.5); |
XIII. |
accident management plan (see description in Section 6.5); |
XIV. |
odour management plan (see BAT 12); |
XV. |
noise and vibration management plan (see BAT 17). |
Applicability
The scope (e.g. level of detail) and nature of the EMS (e.g. standardised or non-standardised) will generally be related to the nature, scale and complexity of the installation, and the range of environmental impacts it may have (determined also by the type and amount of wastes processed).
BAT 2. In order to improve the overall environmental performance of the plant, BAT is to use all of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|||||||||||
a. |
Set up and implement waste characterisation and pre-acceptance procedures |
These procedures aim to ensure the technical (and legal) suitability of waste treatment operations for a particular waste prior to the arrival of the waste at the plant. They include procedures to collect information about the waste input and may include waste sampling and characterisation to achieve sufficient knowledge of the waste composition. Waste pre-acceptance procedures are risk-based considering, for example, the hazardous properties of the waste, the risks posed by the waste in terms of process safety, occupational safety and environmental impact, as well as the information provided by the previous waste holder(s). |
||||||||||
b. |
Set up and implement waste acceptance procedures |
Acceptance procedures aim to confirm the characteristics of the waste, as identified in the pre-acceptance stage. These procedures define the elements to be verified upon the arrival of the waste at the plant as well as the waste acceptance and rejection criteria. They may include waste sampling, inspection and analysis. Waste acceptance procedures are risk-based considering, for example, the hazardous properties of the waste, the risks posed by the waste in terms of process safety, occupational safety and environmental impact, as well as the information provided by the previous waste holder(s). |
||||||||||
c. |
Set up and implement a waste tracking system and inventory |
A waste tracking system and inventory aim to track the location and quantity of waste in the plant. It holds all the information generated during waste pre-acceptance procedures (e.g. date of arrival at the plant and unique reference number of the waste, information on the previous waste holder(s), pre-acceptance and acceptance analysis results, intended treatment route, nature and quantity of the waste held on site including all identified hazards), acceptance, storage, treatment and/or transfer off site. The waste tracking system is risk-based considering, for example, the hazardous properties of the waste, the risks posed by the waste in terms of process safety, occupational safety and environmental impact, as well as the information provided by the previous waste holder(s). |
||||||||||
d. |
Set up and implement an output quality management system |
This technique involves setting up and implementing an output quality management system, so as to ensure that the output of the waste treatment is in line with the expectations, using for example existing EN standards. This management system also allows the performance of the waste treatment to be monitored and optimised, and for this purpose may include a material flow analysis of relevant components throughout the waste treatment. The use of a material flow analysis is risk-based considering, for example, the hazardous properties of the waste, the risks posed by the waste in terms of process safety, occupational safety and environmental impact, as well as the information provided by the previous waste holder(s). |
||||||||||
e. |
Ensure waste segregation |
Waste is kept separated depending on its properties in order to enable easier and environmentally safer storage and treatment. Waste segregation relies on the physical separation of waste and on procedures that identify when and where wastes are stored. |
||||||||||
f. |
Ensure waste compatibility prior to mixing or blending of waste |
Compatibility is ensured by a set of verification measures and tests in order to detect any unwanted and/or potentially dangerous chemical reactions between wastes (e.g. polymerisation, gas evolution, exothermal reaction, decomposition, crystallisation, precipitation) when mixing, blending or carrying out other treatment operations. The compatibility tests are risk-based considering, for example, the hazardous properties of the waste, the risks posed by the waste in terms of process safety, occupational safety and environmental impact, as well as the information provided by the previous waste holder(s). |
||||||||||
g. |
Sort incoming solid waste |
Sorting of incoming solid waste (10) aims to prevent unwanted material from entering subsequent waste treatment process(es). It may include:
|
BAT 3. In order to facilitate the reduction of emissions to water and air, BAT is to establish and to maintain an inventory of waste water and waste gas streams, as part of the environmental management system (see BAT 1), that incorporates all of the following features:
(i) |
information about the characteristics of the waste to be treated and the waste treatment processes, including:
|
(ii) |
information about the characteristics of the waste water streams, such as:
|
(iii) |
information about the characteristics of the waste gas streams, such as:
|
Applicability
The scope (e.g. level of detail) and nature of the inventory will generally be related to the nature, scale and complexity of the installation, and the range of environmental impacts it may have (determined also by the type and amount of wastes processed).
BAT 4. In order to reduce the environmental risk associated with the storage of waste, BAT is to use all of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|||||||
a. |
Optimised storage location |
This includes techniques such as:
|
Generally applicable to new plants. |
||||||
b. |
Adequate storage capacity |
Measures are taken to avoid accumulation of waste, such as:
|
Generally applicable. |
||||||
c. |
Safe storage operation |
This includes measures such as:
|
|||||||
d. |
Separate area for storage and handling of packaged hazardous waste |
When relevant, a dedicated area is used for storage and handling of packaged hazardous waste. |
BAT 5. In order to reduce the environmental risk associated with the handling and transfer of waste, BAT is to set up and implement handling and transfer procedures.
Description
Handling and transfer procedures aim to ensure that wastes are safely handled and transferred to the respective storage or treatment. They include the following elements:
— |
handling and transfer of waste are carried out by competent staff; |
— |
handling and transfer of waste are duly documented, validated prior to execution and verified after execution; |
— |
measures are taken to prevent, detect and mitigate spills; |
— |
operation and design precautions are taken when mixing or blending wastes (e.g. vacuuming dusty/powdery wastes). |
Handling and transfer procedures are risk-based considering the likelihood of accidents and incidents and their environmental impact.
1.2. Monitoring
BAT 6. For relevant emissions to water as identified by the inventory of waste water streams (see BAT 3), BAT is to monitor key process parameters (e.g. waste water flow, pH, temperature, conductivity, BOD) at key locations (e.g. at the inlet and/or outlet of the pretreatment, at the inlet to the final treatment, at the point where the emission leaves the installation).
BAT 7. BAT is to monitor emissions to water with at least the frequency given below, and in accordance with EN standards. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality.
Substance/parameter |
Standard(s) |
Waste treatment process |
Monitoring associated with |
|
EN ISO 9562 |
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
BAT 20 |
|
EN ISO 15680 |
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every month |
||
No EN standard available |
All waste treatments except treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every month |
||
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
|||
Various EN standards available (i.e. EN ISO 14403-1 and -2) |
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
||
Hydrocarbon oil index (HOI) (14) |
EN ISO 9377-2 |
Mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste |
Once every month |
|
Treatment of WEEE containing VFCs and/or VHCs |
||||
Re-refining of waste oil |
||||
Physico-chemical treatment of waste with calorific value |
||||
Water washing of excavated contaminated soil |
||||
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
|||
Arsenic (As), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Lead (Pb), Zinc (Zn) (13) (14) |
Various EN standards available (e.g. EN ISO 11885, EN ISO 17294-2, EN ISO 15586) |
Mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste |
Once every month |
|
Treatment of WEEE containing VFCs and/or VHCs |
||||
Mechanical biological treatment of waste |
||||
Re-refining of waste oil |
||||
Physico-chemical treatment of waste with calorific value |
||||
Physico-chemical treatment of solid and/or pasty waste |
||||
Regeneration of spent solvents |
||||
Water washing of excavated contaminated soil |
||||
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
|||
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
|||
Various EN standards available (i.e. EN ISO 10304-3, EN ISO 23913) |
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
||
Various EN standards available (i.e. EN ISO 17852, EN ISO 12846) |
Mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste |
Once every month |
||
Treatment of WEEE containing VFCs and/or VHCs |
||||
Mechanical biological treatment of waste |
||||
Re-refining of waste oil |
||||
Physico-chemical treatment of waste with calorific value |
||||
Physico-chemical treatment of solid and/or pasty waste |
||||
Regeneration of spent solvents |
||||
Water washing of excavated contaminated soil |
||||
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
|||
PFOA (13) |
No EN standard available |
All waste treatments |
Once every six months |
|
PFOS (13) |
||||
Phenol index (16) |
EN ISO 14402 |
Re-refining of waste oil |
Once every month |
|
Physico-chemical treatment of waste with calorific value |
||||
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
|||
Total nitrogen (Total N) (16) |
EN 12260, EN ISO 11905-1 |
Biological treatment of waste |
Once every month |
|
Re-refining of waste oil |
||||
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
|||
EN 1484 |
All waste treatments except treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every month |
||
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
|||
Total phosphorus (Total P) (16) |
Various EN standards available (i.e. EN ISO 15681-1 and -2, EN ISO 6878, EN ISO 11885) |
Biological treatment of waste |
Once every month |
|
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
|||
Total suspended solids (TSS) (16) |
EN 872 |
All waste treatments except treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every month |
|
Treatment of water-based liquid waste |
Once every day |
BAT 8. BAT is to monitor channelled emissions to air with at least the frequency given below, and in accordance with EN standards. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality.
Substance/Parameter |
Standard(s) |
Waste treatment process |
Minimum monitoring frequency (17) |
Monitoring associated with |
Brominated flame retardants (18) |
No EN standard available |
Mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste |
Once every year |
BAT 25 |
CFCs |
No EN standard available |
Treatment of WEEE containing VFCs and/or VHCs |
Once every six months |
BAT 29 |
Dioxin-like PCBs |
EN 1948-1, -2, and -4 (19) |
Mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste (18) |
Once every year |
BAT 25 |
Decontamination of equipment containing PCBs |
Once every three months |
BAT 51 |
||
Dust |
EN 13284-1 |
Mechanical treatment of waste |
Once every six months |
BAT 25 |
Mechanical biological treatment of waste |
BAT 34 |
|||
Physico-chemical treatment of solid and/or pasty waste |
BAT 41 |
|||
Thermal treatment of spent activated carbon, waste catalysts and excavated contaminated soil |
BAT 49 |
|||
Water washing of excavated contaminated soil |
BAT 50 |
|||
HCl |
EN 1911 |
Thermal treatment of spent activated carbon, waste catalysts and excavated contaminated soil (18) |
Once every six months |
BAT 49 |
Treatment of water-based liquid waste (18) |
BAT 53 |
|||
HF |
No EN standard available |
Thermal treatment of spent activated carbon, waste catalysts and excavated contaminated soil (18) |
Once every six months |
BAT 49 |
Hg |
EN 13211 |
Treatment of WEEE containing mercury |
Once every three months |
BAT 32 |
H2S |
No EN standard available |
Biological treatment of waste (20) |
Once every six months |
BAT 34 |
Metals and metalloids except mercury (e.g. As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Tl, V) (18) |
EN 14385 |
Mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste |
Once every year |
BAT 25 |
NH3 |
No EN standard available |
Biological treatment of waste (20) |
Once every six months |
BAT 34 |
Physico-chemical treatment of solid and/or pasty waste (18) |
Once every six months |
BAT 41 |
||
Treatment of water-based liquid waste (18) |
BAT 53 |
|||
Odour concentration |
EN 13725 |
Biological treatment of waste (21) |
Once every six months |
BAT 34 |
PCDD/F (18) |
EN 1948-1, -2 and -3 (19) |
Mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste |
Once every year |
BAT 25 |
TVOC |
EN 12619 |
Mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste |
Once every six months |
BAT 25 |
Treatment of WEEE containing VFCs and/or VHCs |
Once every six months |
BAT 29 |
||
Mechanical treatment of waste with calorific value (18) |
Once every six months |
BAT 31 |
||
Mechanical biological treatment of waste |
Once every six months |
BAT 34 |
||
Physico-chemical treatment of solid and/or pasty waste (18) |
Once every six months |
BAT 41 |
||
Re-refining of waste oil |
BAT 44 |
|||
Physico-chemical treatment of waste with calorific value |
BAT 45 |
|||
Regeneration of spent solvents |
BAT 47 |
|||
Thermal treatment of spent activated carbon, waste catalysts and excavated contaminated soil |
BAT 49 |
|||
Water washing of excavated contaminated soil |
BAT 50 |
|||
Treatment of water-based liquid waste (18) |
BAT 53 |
|||
Decontamination of equipment containing PCBs (22) |
Once every three months |
BAT 51 |
BAT 9. BAT is to monitor diffuse emissions of organic compounds to air from the regeneration of spent solvents, the decontamination of equipment containing POPs with solvents, and the physico-chemical treatment of solvents for the recovery of their calorific value, at least once per year using one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|
a |
Measurement |
Sniffing methods, optical gas imaging, solar occultation flux or differential absorption. See descriptions in Section 6.2. |
b |
Emissions factors |
Calculation of emissions based on emissions factors, periodically validated (e.g. once every two years) by measurements. |
c |
Mass balance |
Calculation of diffuse emissions using a mass balance considering the solvent input, channelled emissions to air, emissions to water, the solvent in the process output, and process (e.g. distillation) residues. |
BAT 10. BAT is to periodically monitor odour emissions.
Description
Odour emissions can be monitored using:
— |
EN standards (e.g. dynamic olfactometry according to EN 13725 in order to determine the odour concentration or EN 16841-1 or -2 in order to determine the odour exposure); |
— |
when applying alternative methods for which no EN standards are available (e.g. estimation of odour impact), ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality. |
The monitoring frequency is determined in the odour management plan (see BAT 12).
Applicability
The applicability is restricted to cases where an odour nuisance at sensitive receptors is expected and/or has been substantiated.
BAT 11. BAT is to monitor the annual consumption of water, energy and raw materials as well as the annual generation of residues and waste water, with a frequency of at least once per year.
Description
Monitoring includes direct measurements, calculation or recording, e.g. using suitable meters or invoices. The monitoring is broken down at the most appropriate level (e.g. at process or plant/installation level) and considers any significant changes in the plant/installation.
1.3. Emissions to air
BAT 12. In order to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce odour emissions, BAT is to set up, implement and regularly review an odour management plan, as part of the environmental management system (see BAT 1), that includes all of the following elements:
— |
a protocol containing actions and timelines; |
— |
a protocol for conducting odour monitoring as set out in BAT 10; |
— |
a protocol for response to identified odour incidents, e.g. complaints; |
— |
an odour prevention and reduction programme designed to identify the source(s); to characterise the contributions of the sources; and to implement prevention and/or reduction measures. |
Applicability
The applicability is restricted to cases where an odour nuisance at sensitive receptors is expected and/or has been substantiated.
BAT 13. In order to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce odour emissions, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|||||||
a. |
Minimising residence times |
Minimising the residence time of (potentially) odorous waste in storage or in handling systems (e.g. pipes, tanks, containers), in particular under anaerobic conditions. When relevant, adequate provisions are made for the acceptance of seasonal peak volumes of waste. |
Only applicable to open systems. |
||||||
b. |
Using chemical treatment |
Using chemicals to destroy or to reduce the formation of odorous compounds (e.g. to oxidise or to precipitate hydrogen sulphide). |
Not applicable if it may hamper the desired output quality. |
||||||
c. |
Optimising aerobic treatment |
In the case of aerobic treatment of water-based liquid waste, it may include:
In the case of aerobic treatment of waste other than water-based liquid waste, see BAT 36. |
Generally applicable. |
BAT 14. In order to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce diffuse emissions to air, in particular of dust, organic compounds and odour, BAT is to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given below.
Depending on the risk posed by the waste in terms of diffuse emissions to air, BAT 14d is especially relevant.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|||||||||||
a. |
Minimising the number of potential diffuse emission sources |
This includes techniques such as:
|
Generally applicable. |
||||||||||
b. |
Selection and use of high-integrity equipment |
This includes techniques such as:
|
Applicability may be restricted in the case of existing plants due to operability requirements. |
||||||||||
c. |
Corrosion prevention |
This includes techniques such as:
|
Generally applicable. |
||||||||||
d. |
Containment, collection and treatment of diffuse emissions |
This includes techniques such as:
|
The use of enclosed equipment or buildings may be restricted by safety considerations such as the risk of explosion or oxygen depletion. The use of enclosed equipment or buildings may also be constrained by the volume of waste. |
||||||||||
e. |
Dampening |
Dampening potential sources of diffuse dust emissions (e.g. waste storage, traffic areas, and open handling processes) with water or fog. |
Generally applicable. |
||||||||||
f. |
Maintenance |
This includes techniques such as:
|
Generally applicable. |
||||||||||
g. |
Cleaning of waste treatment and storage areas |
This includes techniques such as regularly cleaning the whole waste treatment area (halls, traffic areas, storage areas, etc.), conveyor belts, equipment and containers. |
Generally applicable. |
||||||||||
h. |
Leak detection and repair (LDAR) programme |
See Section 6.2. When emissions of organic compounds are expected, a LDAR programme is set up and implemented using a risk-based approach, considering in particular the design of the plant and the amount and nature of the organic compounds concerned. |
Generally applicable. |
BAT 15. BAT is to use flaring only for safety reasons or for non-routine operating conditions (e.g. start-ups, shutdowns) by using both of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|
a. |
Correct plant design |
This includes the provision of a gas recovery system with sufficient capacity and the use of high-integrity relief valves. |
Generally applicable to new plants. A gas recovery system may be retrofitted in existing plants. |
b. |
Plant management |
This includes balancing the gas system and using advanced process control. |
Generally applicable. |
BAT 16. In order to reduce emissions to air from flares when flaring is unavoidable, BAT is to use both of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|
a. |
Correct design of flaring devices |
Optimisation of height and pressure, assistance by steam, air or gas, type of flare tips, etc., to enable smokeless and reliable operation and to ensure the efficient combustion of excess gases. |
Generally applicable to new flares. In existing plants, applicability may be restricted, e.g. due to maintenance time availability. |
b. |
Monitoring and recording as part of flare management |
This includes continuous monitoring of the quantity of gas sent to flaring. It may include estimations of other parameters (e.g. composition of gas flow, heat content, ratio of assistance, velocity, purge gas flow rate, pollutant emissions (e.g. NOX, CO, hydrocarbons), noise). The recording of flaring events usually includes the duration and number of events and allows for the quantification of emissions and the potential prevention of future flaring events. |
Generally applicable. |
1.4. Noise and vibrations
BAT 17. In order to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce noise and vibration emissions, BAT is to set up, implement and regularly review a noise and vibration management plan, as part of the environmental management system (see BAT 1), that includes all of the following elements:
I. |
a protocol containing appropriate actions and timelines; |
II. |
a protocol for conducting noise and vibration monitoring; |
III. |
a protocol for response to identified noise and vibration events, e.g. complaints; |
IV. |
a noise and vibration reduction programme designed to identify the source(s), to measure/estimate noise and vibration exposure, to characterise the contributions of the sources and to implement prevention and/or reduction measures. |
Applicability
The applicability is restricted to cases where a noise or vibration nuisance at sensitive receptors is expected and/or has been substantiated.
BAT 18. In order to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce noise and vibration emissions, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|||||||||||
a. |
Appropriate location of equipment and buildings |
Noise levels can be reduced by increasing the distance between the emitter and the receiver, by using buildings as noise screens and by relocating building exits or entrances. |
For existing plants, the relocation of equipment and building exits or entrances may be restricted by a lack of space or excessive costs. |
||||||||||
b. |
Operational measures |
This includes techniques such as:
|
Generally applicable. |
||||||||||
c. |
Low-noise equipment |
This may include direct drive motors, compressors, pumps and flares. |
|||||||||||
d. |
Noise and vibration control equipment |
This includes techniques such as:
|
Applicability may be restricted by a lack of space (for existing plants). |
||||||||||
e. |
Noise attenuation |
Noise propagation can be reduced by inserting obstacles between emitters and receivers (e.g. protection walls, embankments and buildings). |
Applicable only to existing plants, as the design of new plants should make this technique unnecessary. For existing plants, the insertion of obstacles may be restricted by a lack of space. For mechanical treatment in shredders of metal wastes, it is applicable within the constraints associated with the risk of deflagration in shredders. |
1.5. Emissions to water
BAT 19. In order to optimise water consumption, to reduce the volume of waste water generated and to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce emissions to soil and water, BAT is to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|||||||||
a. |
Water management |
Water consumption is optimised by using measures which may include:
|
Generally applicable. |
||||||||
b. |
Water recirculation |
Water streams are recirculated within the plant, if necessary after treatment. The degree of recirculation is limited by the water balance of the plant, the content of impurities (e.g. odorous compounds) and/or the characteristics of the water streams (e.g. nutrient content). |
Generally applicable. |
||||||||
c. |
Impermeable surface |
Depending on the risks posed by the waste in terms of soil and/or water contamination, the surface of the whole waste treatment area (e.g. waste reception, handling, storage, treatment and dispatch areas) is made impermeable to the liquids concerned. |
Generally applicable. |
||||||||
d. |
Techniques to reduce the likelihood and impact of overflows and failures from tanks and vessels |
Depending on the risks posed by the liquids contained in tanks and vessels in terms of soil and/or water contamination, this includes techniques such as:
|
Generally applicable. |
||||||||
e. |
Roofing of waste storage and treatment areas |
Depending on the risks posed by the waste in terms of soil and/or water contamination, waste is stored and treated in covered areas to prevent contact with rainwater and thus minimise the volume of contaminated run-off water. |
Applicability may be constrained when high volumes of waste are stored or treated (e.g. mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste). |
||||||||
f. |
Segregation of water streams |
Each water stream (e.g. surface run-off water, process water) is collected and treated separately, based on the pollutant content and on the combination of treatment techniques. In particular, uncontaminated waste water streams are segregated from waste water streams that require treatment. |
Generally applicable to new plants. Generally applicable to existing plants within the constraints associated with the layout of the water collection system. |
||||||||
g. |
Adequate drainage infrastructure |
The waste treatment area is connected to drainage infrastructure. Rainwater falling on the treatment and storage areas is collected in the drainage infrastructure along with washing water, occasional spillages, etc. and, depending on the pollutant content, recirculated or sent for further treatment. |
Generally applicable to new plants. Generally applicable to existing plants within the constraints associated with the layout of the water drainage system. |
||||||||
h. |
Design and maintenance provisions to allow detection and repair of leaks |
Regular monitoring for potential leakages is risk-based, and, when necessary, equipment is repaired. The use of underground components is minimised. When underground components are used, and depending on the risks posed by the waste contained in those components in terms of soil and/or water contamination, secondary containment of underground components is put in place. |
The use of above-ground components is generally applicable to new plants. It may be limited however by the risk of freezing. The installation of secondary containment may be limited in the case of existing plants. |
||||||||
i. |
Appropriate buffer storage capacity |
Appropriate buffer storage capacity is provided for waste water generated during other than normal operating conditions using a risk-based approach (e.g. taking into account the nature of the pollutants, the effects of downstream waste water treatment, and the receiving environment). The discharge of waste water from this buffer storage is only possible after appropriate measures are taken (e.g. monitor, treat, reuse). |
Generally applicable to new plants. For existing plants, applicability may be limited by space availability and by the layout of the water collection system. |
BAT 20. In order to reduce emissions to water, BAT is to treat waste water using an appropriate combination of the techniques given below.
Technique (23) |
Typical pollutants targeted |
Applicability |
|
Preliminary and primary treatment, e.g. |
|||
a. |
Equalisation |
All pollutants |
Generally applicable. |
b. |
Neutralisation |
Acids, alkalis |
|
c. |
Physical separation, e.g. screens, sieves, grit separators, grease separators, oil-water separation or primary settlement tanks |
Gross solids, suspended solids, oil/grease |
|
Physico-chemical treatment, e.g. |
|||
d. |
Adsorption |
Adsorbable dissolved non-biodegradable or inhibitory pollutants, e.g. hydrocarbons, mercury, AOX |
Generally applicable. |
e. |
Distillation/rectification |
Dissolved non-biodegradable or inhibitory pollutants that can be distilled, e.g. some solvents |
|
f. |
Precipitation |
Precipitable dissolved non-biodegradable or inhibitory pollutants, e.g. metals, phosphorus |
|
g. |
Chemical oxidation |
Oxidisable dissolved non-biodegradable or inhibitory pollutants, e.g. nitrite, cyanide |
|
h. |
Chemical reduction |
Reducible dissolved non-biodegradable or inhibitory pollutants, e.g. hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) |
|
i. |
Evaporation |
Soluble contaminants |
|
j. |
Ion exchange |
Ionic dissolved non-biodegradable or inhibitory pollutants, e.g. metals |
|
k. |
Stripping |
Purgeable pollutants, e.g. hydrogen sulphide (H2S), ammonia (NH3), some adsorbable organically bound halogens (AOX), hydrocarbons |
|
Biological treatment, e.g. |
|||
l. |
Activated sludge process |
Biodegradable organic compounds |
Generally applicable. |
m. |
Membrane bioreactor |
||
Nitrogen removal |
|||
n. |
Nitrification/denitrification when the treatment includes a biological treatment |
Total nitrogen, ammonia |
Nitrification may not be applicable in the case of high chloride concentrations (e.g. above 10 g/l) and when the reduction of the chloride concentration prior to nitrification would not be justified by the environmental benefits. Nitrification is not applicable when the temperature of the waste water is low (e.g. below 12 °C). |
Solids removal, e.g. |
|||
o. |
Coagulation and flocculation |
Suspended solids and particulate-bound metals |
Generally applicable. |
p. |
Sedimentation |
||
q. |
Filtration (e.g. sand filtration, microfiltration, ultrafiltration) |
||
r. |
Flotation |
Table 6.1
BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for direct discharges to a receiving water body
Substance/Parameter |
BAT-AEL (24) |
Waste treatment process to which the BAT-AEL applies |
|||||||||||||||||
Total organic carbon (TOC) (25) |
10-60 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Chemical oxygen demand (COD) (25) |
30-180 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total suspended solids (TSS) |
5-60 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Hydrocarbon oil index (HOI) |
0,5-10 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total nitrogen (Total N) |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total phosphorus (Total P) |
0,3-2 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
1-3 mg/l (27) |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Phenol index |
0,05-0,2 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
0,05-0,3 mg/l |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Free cyanide (CN-) (31) |
0,02-0,1 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Adsorbable organically bound halogens (AOX) (31) |
0,2-1 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Metals and metalloids (31) |
Arsenic (expressed as As) |
0,01-0,05 mg/l |
|
||||||||||||||||
Cadmium (expressed as Cd) |
0,01-0,05 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Chromium (expressed as Cr) |
0,01-0,15 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Copper (expressed as Cu) |
0,05-0,5 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Lead (expressed as Pb) |
0,05-0,1 mg/l (32) |
||||||||||||||||||
Nickel (expressed as Ni) |
0,05-0,5 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Mercury (expressed as Hg) |
0,5-5 μg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Zinc (expressed as Zn) |
0,1-1 mg/l (33) |
||||||||||||||||||
Arsenic (expressed as As) |
0,01-0,1 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Cadmium (expressed as Cd) |
0,01-0,1 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Chromium (expressed as Cr) |
0,01-0,3 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Hexavalent chromium (expressed as Cr(VI)) |
0,01-0,1 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Copper (expressed as Cu) |
0,05-0,5 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Lead (expressed as Pb) |
0,05-0,3 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Nickel (expressed as Ni) |
0,05-1 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Mercury (expressed as Hg) |
1-10 μg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Zinc (expressed as Zn) |
0,1-2 mg/l |
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 7.
Table 6.2
BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for indirect discharges to a receiving water body
Substance/Parameter |
Waste treatment process to which the BAT-AEL applies |
||||||||||||||||||
Hydrocarbon oil index (HOI) |
0,5-10 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Free cyanide (CN-) (36) |
0,02-0,1 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Adsorbable organically bound halogens (AOX) (36) |
0,2-1 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Metals and metalloids (36) |
Arsenic (expressed as As) |
0,01-0,05 mg/l |
|
||||||||||||||||
Cadmium (expressed as Cd) |
0,01-0,05 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Chromium (expressed as Cr) |
0,01-0,15 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Copper (expressed as Cu) |
0,05-0,5 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Lead (expressed as Pb) |
0,05-0,1 mg/l (37) |
||||||||||||||||||
Nickel (expressed as Ni) |
0,05-0,5 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Mercury (expressed as Hg) |
0,5-5 μg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Zinc (expressed as Zn) |
0,1-1 mg/l (38) |
||||||||||||||||||
Arsenic (expressed as As) |
0,01-0,1 mg/l |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Cadmium (expressed as Cd) |
0,01-0,1 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Chromium (expressed as Cr) |
0,01-0,3 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Hexavalent chromium (expressed as Cr(VI)) |
0,01-0,1 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Copper (expressed as Cu) |
0,05-0,5 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Lead (expressed as Pb) |
0,05-0,3 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Nickel (expressed as Ni) |
0,05-1 mg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Mercury (expressed as Hg) |
1-10 μg/l |
||||||||||||||||||
Zinc (expressed as Zn) |
0,1-2 mg/l |
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 7.
1.6. Emissions from accidents and incidents
BAT 21. In order to prevent or limit the environmental consequences of accidents and incidents, BAT is to use all of the techniques given below, as part of the accident management plan (see BAT 1).
Technique |
Description |
|||||||
a. |
Protection measures |
These include measures such as:
|
||||||
b. |
Management of incidental/accidental emissions |
Procedures are established and technical provisions are in place to manage (in terms of possible containment) emissions from accidents and incidents such as emissions from spillages, firefighting water, or safety valves. |
||||||
c. |
Incident/accident registration and assessment system |
This includes techniques such as:
|
1.7. Material efficiency
BAT 22. In order to use materials efficiently, BAT is to substitute materials with waste.
Description
Waste is used instead of other materials for the treatment of wastes (e.g. waste alkalis or waste acids are used for pH adjustment, fly ashes are used as binders).
Applicability
Some applicability limitations derive from the risk of contamination posed by the presence of impurities (e.g. heavy metals, POPs, salts, pathogens) in the waste that substitutes other materials. Another limitation is the compatibility of the waste substituting other materials with the waste input (see BAT 2).
1.8. Energy efficiency
BAT 23. In order to use energy efficiently, BAT is to use both of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|||||||
a. |
Energy efficiency plan |
An energy efficiency plan entails defining and calculating the specific energy consumption of the activity (or activities), setting key performance indicators on an annual basis (for example, specific energy consumption expressed in kWh/tonne of waste processed) and planning periodic improvement targets and related actions. The plan is adapted to the specificities of the waste treatment in terms of process(es) carried out, waste stream(s) treated, etc. |
||||||
b. |
Energy balance record |
An energy balance record provides a breakdown of the energy consumption and generation (including exportation) by the type of source (i.e. electricity, gas, conventional liquid fuels, conventional solid fuels, and waste). This includes:
The energy balance record is adapted to the specificities of the waste treatment in terms of process(es) carried out, waste stream(s) treated, etc. |
1.9. Reuse of packaging
BAT 24. In order to reduce the quantity of waste sent for disposal, BAT is to maximise the reuse of packaging, as part of the residues management plan (see BAT 1).
Description
Packaging (drums, containers, IBCs, pallets, etc.) is reused for containing waste, when it is in good condition and sufficiently clean, depending on a compatibility check between the substances contained (in consecutive uses). If necessary, packaging is sent for appropriate treatment prior to reuse (e.g. reconditioning, cleaning).
Applicability
Some applicability restrictions derive from the risk of contamination of the waste posed by the reused packaging.
2. BAT CONCLUSIONS FOR THE MECHANICAL TREATMENT OF WASTE
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in Section 2 apply to the mechanical treatment of waste when it is not combined with biological treatment, and in addition to the general BAT conclusions in Section 1.
2.1. General BAT conclusions for the mechanical treatment of waste
2.1.1. Emissions to air
BAT 25. In order to reduce emissions to air of dust, and of particulate-bound metals, PCDD/F and dioxin-like PCBs, BAT is to apply BAT 14d and to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|
a. |
Cyclone |
See Section 6.1. Cyclones are mainly used as preliminary separators for coarse dust. |
Generally applicable. |
b. |
Fabric filter |
See Section 6.1. |
May not be applicable to exhaust air ducts directly connected to the shredder when the effects of deflagration on the fabric filter cannot be mitigated (e.g. by using pressure relief valves). |
c. |
Wet scrubbing |
See Section 6.1. |
Generally applicable. |
d. |
Water injection into the shredder |
The waste to be shredded is damped by injecting water into the shredder. The amount of water injected is regulated in relation to the amount of waste being shredded (which may be monitored via the energy consumed by the shredder motor). The waste gas that contains residual dust is directed to cyclone(s) and/or a wet scrubber. |
Only applicable within the constraints associated with local conditions (e.g. low temperature, drought). |
Table 6.3
BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for channelled dust emissions to air from the mechanical treatment of waste
Parameter |
Unit |
BAT-AEL (Average over the sampling period) |
Dust |
mg/Nm3 |
2-5 (39) |
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
2.2. BAT conclusions for the mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section apply to the mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste, in addition to BAT 25.
2.2.1. Overall environmental performance
BAT 26. In order to improve the overall environmental performance, and to prevent emissions due to accidents and incidents, BAT is to use BAT 14g and all of the techniques given below:
(a) |
implementation of a detailed inspection procedure for baled waste before shredding; |
(b) |
removal of dangerous items from the waste input stream and their safe disposal (e.g. gas cylinders, non-depolluted EoLVs, non-depolluted WEEE, items contaminated with PCBs or mercury, radioactive items); |
(c) |
treatment of containers only when accompanied by a declaration of cleanliness. |
2.2.2. Deflagrations
BAT 27. In order to prevent deflagrations and to reduce emissions when deflagrations occur, BAT is to use technique a. and one or both of the techniques b. and c. given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|||||||
a. |
Deflagration management plan |
This includes:
|
Generally applicable. |
||||||
b. |
Pressure relief dampers |
Pressure relief dampers are installed to relieve pressure waves coming from deflagrations that would otherwise cause major damage and subsequent emissions. |
|||||||
c. |
Pre-shredding |
Use of a low-speed shredder installed upstream of the main shredder |
Generally applicable for new plants, depending on the input material. Applicable for major plant upgrades where a significant number of deflagrations have been substantiated. |
2.2.3. Energy efficiency
BAT 28. In order to use energy efficiently, BAT is to keep the shredder feed stable.
Description
The shredder feed is equalised by avoiding disruption or overload of the waste feed which would lead to unwanted shutdowns and start-ups of the shredder.
2.3. BAT conclusions for the treatment of WEEE containing VFCs and/or VHCs
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section apply to the treatment of WEEE containing VFCs and/or VHCs, in addition to BAT 25.
2.3.1. Emissions to air
BAT 29. In order to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce emissions of organic compounds to air, BAT is to apply BAT 14d, BAT 14h and to use technique a. and one or both of the techniques b. and c. given below.
Technique |
Description |
|
a. |
Optimised removal and capture of refrigerants and oils |
All refrigerants and oils are removed from the WEEE containing VFCs and/or VHCs and captured by a vacuum suction system (e.g. achieving refrigerant removal of at least 90 %). Refrigerants are separated from oils and the oils are degassed. The amount of oil remaining in the compressor is reduced to a minimum (so that the compressor does not drip). |
b. |
Cryogenic condensation |
Waste gas containing organic compounds such as VFCs/VHCs is sent to a cryogenic condensation unit where they are liquefied (see description in Section 6.1). The liquefied gas is stored in pressurised vessels for further treatment. |
c. |
Adsorption |
Waste gas containing organic compounds such as VFCs/VHCs is led into adsorption systems (see description in Section 6.1). The spent activated carbon is regenerated by means of heated air pumped into the filter to desorb the organic compounds. Subsequently, the regeneration waste gas is compressed and cooled in order to liquefy the organic compounds (in some cases by cryogenic condensation). The liquefied gas is then stored in pressurised vessels. The remaining waste gas from the compression stage is usually led back into the adsorption system in order to minimise VFC/VHC emissions. |
Table 6.4
BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for channelled TVOC and CFC emissions to air from the treatment of WEEE containing VFCs and/or VHCs
Parameter |
Unit |
BAT-AEL (Average over the sampling period) |
TVOC |
mg/Nm3 |
3-15 |
CFCs |
mg/Nm3 |
0,5-10 |
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
2.3.2. Explosions
BAT 30. In order to prevent emissions due to explosions when treating WEEE containing VFCs and/or VHCs, BAT is to use either of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|
a. |
Inert atmosphere |
By injecting inert gas (e.g. nitrogen), the oxygen concentration in enclosed equipment (e.g. in enclosed shredders, crushers, dust and foam collectors) is reduced (e.g. to 4 vol-%). |
b. |
Forced ventilation |
By using forced ventilation, the hydrocarbon concentration in enclosed equipment (e.g. in enclosed shredders, crushers, dust and foam collectors) is reduced to < 25 % of the lower explosive limit. |
2.4. BAT conclusions for the mechanical treatment of waste with calorific value
In addition to BAT 25, the BAT conclusions presented in this section apply to the mechanical treatment of waste with calorific value covered by points 5.3(a)(iii) and 5.3(b)(ii) of Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU.
2.4.1. Emissions to air
BAT 31. In order to reduce emissions to air of organic compounds, BAT is to apply BAT 14d and to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|
a. |
Adsorption |
See Section 6.1. |
b. |
Biofilter |
|
c. |
Thermal oxidation |
|
d. |
Wet scrubbing |
Table 6.5
BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for channelled TVOC emissions to air from the mechanical treatment of waste with calorific value
Parameter |
Unit |
BAT-AEL (Average over the sampling period) |
TVOC |
mg/Nm3 |
10-30 (40) |
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
2.5. BAT conclusions for the mechanical treatment of WEEE containing mercury
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section apply to the mechanical treatment of WEEE containing mercury, in addition to BAT 25.
2.5.1. Emissions to air
BAT 32. In order to reduce mercury emissions to air, BAT is to collect mercury emissions at source, to send them to abatement and to carry out adequate monitoring.
Description
This includes all of the following measures:
— |
equipment used to treat WEEE containing mercury is enclosed, under negative pressure and connected to a local exhaust ventilation (LEV) system; |
— |
waste gas from the processes is treated by dedusting techniques such as cyclones, fabric filters, and HEPA filters, followed by adsorption on activated carbon (see Section 6.1); |
— |
the efficiency of the waste gas treatment is monitored; |
— |
mercury levels in the treatment and storage areas are measured frequently (e.g. once every week) to detect potential mercury leaks. |
Table 6.6
BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for channelled mercury emissions to air from the mechanical treatment of WEEE containing mercury
Parameter |
Unit |
BAT-AEL (Average over the sampling period) |
Mercury (Hg) |
μg/Nm3 |
2-7 |
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
3. BAT CONCLUSIONS FOR THE BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF WASTE
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in Section 3 apply to the biological treatment of waste, and in addition to the general BAT conclusions in Section 1. The BAT conclusions in Section 3 do not apply to the treatment of water-based liquid waste.
3.1. General BAT conclusions for the biological treatment of waste
3.1.1. Overall environmental performance
BAT 33. In order to reduce odour emissions and to improve the overall environmental performance, BAT is to select the waste input.
Description
The technique consists of carrying out the pre-acceptance, acceptance and sorting of the waste input (see BAT 2) so as to ensure the suitability of the waste input for the waste treatment, e.g. in terms of nutrient balance, moisture or toxic compounds which may reduce the biological activity.
3.1.2. Emissions to air
BAT 34. In order to reduce channelled emissions to air of dust, organic compounds and odorous compounds, including H2S and NH3, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|
a. |
Adsorption |
See Section 6.1. |
b. |
Biofilter |
See Section 6.1. A pretreatment of the waste gas before the biofilter (e.g. with a water or acid scrubber) may be needed in the case of a high NH3 content (e.g. 5-40 mg/Nm3) in order to control the media pH and to limit the formation of N2O in the biofilter. Some other odorous compounds (e.g. mercaptans, H2S) can cause acidification of the biofilter media and necessitate the use of a water or alkaline scrubber for pretreatment of the waste gas before the biofilter. |
c. |
Fabric filter |
See Section 6.1. The fabric filter is used in the case of mechanical biological treatment of waste. |
d. |
Thermal oxidation |
See Section 6.1. |
e. |
Wet scrubbing |
See Section 6.1. Water, acid or alkaline scrubbers are used in combination with a biofilter, thermal oxidation or adsorption on activated carbon. |
Table 6.7
BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for channelled NH3, odour, dust and TVOC emissions to air from the biological treatment of waste
Parameter |
Unit |
BAT-AEL (Average over the sampling period) |
Waste treatment process |
mg/Nm3 |
0,3-20 |
All biological treatments of waste |
|
ouE/Nm3 |
200-1 000 |
||
Dust |
mg/Nm3 |
2-5 |
Mechanical biological treatment of waste |
TVOC |
mg/Nm3 |
5-40 (43) |
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
3.1.3. Emissions to water and water usage
BAT 35. In order to reduce the generation of waste water and to reduce water usage, BAT is to use all of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|
a. |
Segregation of water streams |
Leachate seeping from compost piles and windrows is segregated from surface run-off water (see BAT 19f). |
Generally applicable to new plants. Generally applicable to existing plants within the constraints associated with the layout of the water circuits. |
b. |
Water recirculation |
Recirculating process water streams (e.g. from dewatering of liquid digestate in anaerobic processes) or using as much as possible other water streams (e.g. water condensate, rinsing water, surface run-off water). The degree of recirculation is limited by the water balance of the plant, the content of impurities (e.g. heavy metals, salts, pathogens, odorous compounds) and/or the characteristics of the water streams (e.g. nutrient content). |
Generally applicable. |
c. |
Minimisation of the generation of leachate |
Optimising the moisture content of the waste in order to minimise the generation of leachate. |
Generally applicable. |
3.2. BAT conclusions for the aerobic treatment of waste
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section apply to the aerobic treatment of waste, and in addition to the general BAT conclusions for the biological treatment of waste in Section 3.1.
3.2.1. Overall environmental performance
BAT 36. In order to reduce emissions to air and to improve the overall environmental performance, BAT is to monitor and/or control the key waste and process parameters.
Description
Monitoring and/or control of key waste and process parameters, including:
— |
waste input characteristics (e.g. C to N ratio, particle size); |
— |
temperature and moisture content at different points in the windrow; |
— |
aeration of the windrow (e.g. via the windrow turning frequency, O2 and/or CO2 concentration in the windrow, temperature of air streams in the case of forced aeration); |
— |
windrow porosity, height and width. |
Applicability
Monitoring of the moisture content in the windrow is not applicable to enclosed processes when health and/or safety issues have been identified. In that case, the moisture content can be monitored before loading the waste into the enclosed composting stage and adjusted when it exits the enclosed composting stage.
3.2.2. Odour and diffuse emissions to air
BAT 37. In order to reduce diffuse emissions to air of dust, odour and bioaerosols from open-air treatment steps, BAT is to use one or both of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|||||
a. |
Use of semipermeable membrane covers |
Active composting windrows are covered by semipermeable membranes. |
Generally applicable. |
||||
b. |
Adaptation of operations to the meteorological conditions |
This includes techniques such as the following:
|
Generally applicable. |
3.3. BAT conclusions for the anaerobic treatment of waste
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section apply to the anaerobic treatment of waste, and in addition to the general BAT conclusions for the biological treatment of waste in Section 3.1.
3.3.1. Emissions to air
BAT 38. In order to reduce emissions to air and to improve the overall environmental performance, BAT is to monitor and/or control the key waste and process parameters.
Description
Implementation of a manual and/or automatic monitoring system to:
— |
ensure a stable digester operation; |
— |
minimise operational difficulties, such as foaming, which may lead to odour emissions; |
— |
provide sufficient early warning of system failures which may lead to a loss of containment and explosions. |
This includes monitoring and/or control of key waste and process parameters, e.g.:
— |
pH and alkalinity of the digester feed; |
— |
digester operating temperature; |
— |
hydraulic and organic loading rates of the digester feed; |
— |
concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA) and ammonia within the digester and digestate; |
— |
biogas quantity, composition (e.g. H2S) and pressure; |
— |
liquid and foam levels in the digester. |
3.4. BAT conclusions for the mechanical biological treatment (MBT) of waste
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section apply to MBT, and in addition to the general BAT conclusions for the biological treatment of waste in Section 3.1.
The BAT conclusions for the aerobic treatment (Section 3.2) and anaerobic treatment (Section 3.3) of waste apply, when relevant, to the mechanical biological treatment of waste.
3.4.1. Emissions to air
BAT 39. In order to reduce emissions to air, BAT is to use both of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|
a. |
Segregation of the waste gas streams |
Splitting of the total waste gas stream into waste gas streams with a high pollutant content and waste gas streams with a low pollutant content, as identified in the inventory mentioned in BAT 3. |
Generally applicable to new plants. Generally applicable to existing plants within the constraints associated with the layout of the air circuits. |
b. |
Recirculation of waste gas |
Recirculation of waste gas with a low pollutant content in the biological process followed by waste gas treatment adapted to the concentration of pollutants (see BAT 34). The use of waste gas in the biological process may be limited by the waste gas temperature and/or the pollutant content. It may be necessary to condense the water vapour contained in the waste gas before reuse. In this case, cooling is necessary, and the condensed water is recirculated when possible (see BAT 35) or treated before discharge. |
4. BAT CONCLUSIONS FOR THE PHYSICO-CHEMICAL TREATMENT OF WASTE
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in Section 4 apply to the physico-chemical treatment of waste, and in addition to the general BAT conclusions in Section 1.
4.1. BAT conclusions for the physico-chemical treatment of solid and/or pasty waste
4.1.1. Overall environmental performance
BAT 40. In order to improve the overall environmental performance, BAT is to monitor the waste input as part of the waste pre-acceptance and acceptance procedures (see BAT 2).
Description
Monitoring the waste input, e.g. in terms of:
— |
content of organics, oxidising agents, metals (e.g. mercury), salts, odorous compounds; |
— |
H2 formation potential upon mixing of flue-gas treatment residues, e.g. fly ashes, with water. |
4.1.2. Emissions to air
BAT 41. In order to reduce emissions of dust, organic compounds and NH3 to air, BAT is to apply BAT 14d and to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|
a. |
Adsorption |
See Section 6.1. |
b. |
Biofilter |
|
c. |
Fabric filter |
|
d. |
Wet scrubbing |
Table 6.8
BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for channelled emissions of dust to air from the physico-chemical treatment of solid and/or pasty waste
Parameter |
Unit |
BAT-AEL (Average over the sampling period) |
Dust |
mg/Nm3 |
2-5 |
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
4.2. BAT conclusions for the re-refining of waste oil
4.2.1. Overall environmental performance
BAT 42. In order to improve the overall environmental performance, BAT is to monitor the waste input as part of the waste pre-acceptance and acceptance procedures (see BAT 2).
Description
Monitoring of the waste input in terms of content of chlorinated compounds (e.g. chlorinated solvents or PCBs).
BAT 43. In order to reduce the quantity of waste sent for disposal, BAT is to use one or both of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|
a. |
Material recovery |
Using the organic residues from vacuum distillation, solvent extraction, thin film evaporators, etc. in asphalt products, etc. |
b. |
Energy recovery |
Using the organic residues from vacuum distillation, solvent extraction, thin film evaporators, etc. to recover energy. |
4.2.2. Emissions to air
BAT 44. In order to reduce emissions of organic compounds to air, BAT is to apply BAT 14d and to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|
a. |
Adsorption |
See Section 6.1. |
b. |
Thermal oxidation |
See Section 6.1. This includes when the waste gas is sent to a process furnace or a boiler. |
c. |
Wet scrubbing |
See Section 6.1. |
The BAT-AEL set in Section 4.5 applies.
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
4.3. BAT conclusions for the physico-chemical treatment of waste with calorific value
4.3.1. Emissions to air
BAT 45. In order to reduce emissions of organic compounds to air, BAT is to apply BAT 14d and to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|
a. |
Adsorption |
See Section 6.1 |
b. |
Cryogenic condensation |
|
c. |
Thermal oxidation |
|
d. |
Wet scrubbing |
The BAT-AEL set in Section 4.5 applies.
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
4.4. BAT conclusions for the regeneration of spent solvents
4.4.1. Overall environmental performance
BAT 46. In order to improve the overall environmental performance of the regeneration of spent solvents, BAT is to use one or both of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|
a. |
Material recovery |
Solvents are recovered from the distillation residues by evaporation. |
Applicability may be restricted when the energy demand is excessive with regards to the quantity of solvent recovered. |
b. |
Energy recovery |
The residues from distillation are used to recover energy. |
Generally applicable. |
4.4.2. Emissions to air
BAT 47. In order to reduce emissions of organic compounds to air, BAT is to apply BAT 14d and to use a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|
a. |
Recirculation of process off-gases in a steam boiler |
The process off-gases from the condensers are sent to the steam boiler supplying the plant. |
May not be applicable to the treatment of halogenated solvent wastes, in order to avoid generating and emitting PCBs and/or PCDD/F. |
b. |
Adsorption |
See Section 6.1. |
There may be limitations to the applicability of the technique due to safety reasons (e.g. activated carbon beds tend to self-ignite when loaded with ketones). |
c. |
Thermal oxidation |
See Section 6.1. |
May not be applicable to the treatment of halogenated solvent wastes, in order to avoid generating and emitting PCBs and/or PCDD/F. |
d. |
Condensation or cryogenic condensation |
See Section 6.1. |
Generally applicable. |
e. |
Wet scrubbing |
See Section 6.1. |
Generally applicable. |
The BAT-AEL set in Section 4.5 applies.
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
4.5. BAT-AEL for emissions of organic compounds to air from the re-refining of waste oil, the physico-chemical treatment of waste with calorific value and the regeneration of spent solvents
Table 6.9
BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for channelled emissions of TVOC to air from the re-refining of waste oil, the physico-chemical treatment of waste with calorific value and the regeneration of spent solvents
Parameter |
Unit |
BAT-AEL (44) (Average over the sampling period) |
TVOC |
mg/Nm3 |
5-30 |
4.6. BAT conclusions for the thermal treatment of spent activated carbon, waste catalysts and excavated contaminated soil
4.6.1. Overall environmental performance
BAT 48. In order to improve the overall environmental performance of the thermal treatment of spent activated carbon, waste catalysts and excavated contaminated soil, BAT is to use all of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
Applicability |
|||||||
a. |
Heat recovery from the furnace off-gas |
Recovered heat may be used, for example, for preheating of combustion air or for the generation of steam, which is also used in the reactivation of the spent activated carbon. |
Generally applicable. |
||||||
b. |
Indirectly fired furnace |
An indirectly fired furnace is used to avoid contact between the contents of the furnace and the flue-gases from the burner(s). |
Indirectly fired furnaces are normally constructed with a metal tube and applicability may be restricted due to corrosion problems. There may be also economic restrictions for retrofitting existing plants. |
||||||
c. |
Process-integrated techniques to reduce emissions to air |
This includes techniques such as:
|
Generally applicable. |
4.6.2. Emissions to air
BAT 49. In order to reduce emissions of HCl, HF, dust and organic compounds to air, BAT is to apply BAT 14d and to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|
a. |
Cyclone |
See Section 6.1. The technique is used in combination with further abatement techniques. |
b. |
Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) |
See Section 6.1. |
c. |
Fabric filter |
|
d. |
Wet scrubbing |
|
e. |
Adsorption |
|
f. |
Condensation |
|
g. |
Thermal oxidation (45) |
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
4.7. BAT conclusions for the water washing of excavated contaminated soil
4.7.1. Emissions to air
BAT 50. In order to reduce emissions of dust and organic compounds to air from the storage, handling, and washing steps, BAT is to apply BAT 14d and to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|
a. |
Adsorption |
See Section 6.1. |
b. |
Fabric filter |
|
c. |
Wet scrubbing |
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
4.8. BAT conclusions for the decontamination of equipment containing PCBs
4.8.1. Overall environmental performance
BAT 51. In order to improve the overall environmental performance and to reduce channelled emissions of PCBs and organic compounds to air, BAT is to use all of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|||||||||
a. |
Coating of the storage and treatment areas |
This includes techniques such as:
|
||||||||
b. |
Implementation of staff access rules to prevent dispersion of contamination |
This includes techniques such as:
|
||||||||
c. |
Optimised equipment cleaning and drainage |
This includes techniques such as:
|
||||||||
d. |
Control and monitoring of emissions to air |
This includes techniques such as:
|
||||||||
e. |
Disposal of waste treatment residues |
This includes techniques such as:
|
||||||||
f. |
Recovery of solvent when solvent washing is used |
Organic solvent is collected and distilled to be reused in the process. |
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
5. BAT CONCLUSIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF WATER-BASED LIQUID WASTE
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in Section 5 apply to the treatment of water-based liquid waste, and in addition to the general BAT conclusions in Section 1.
5.1. Overall environmental performance
BAT 52. In order to improve the overall environmental performance, BAT is to monitor the waste input as part of the waste pre-acceptance and acceptance procedures (see BAT 2).
Description
Monitoring the waste input, e.g. in terms of:
— |
bioeliminability (e.g. BOD, BOD to COD ratio, Zahn-Wellens test, biological inhibition potential (e.g. inhibition of activated sludge)); |
— |
feasibility of emulsion breaking, e.g. by means of laboratory-scale tests. |
5.2. Emissions to air
BAT 53. In order to reduce emissions of HCl, NH3 and organic compounds to air, BAT is to apply BAT 14d and to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Technique |
Description |
|
a. |
Adsorption |
See Section 6.1. |
b. |
Biofilter |
|
c. |
Thermal oxidation |
|
d. |
Wet scrubbing |
Table 6.10
BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for channelled emissions of HCl and TVOC to air from the treatment of water-based liquid waste
Parameter |
Unit |
BAT-AEL (46) (Average over the sampling period) |
Hydrogen chloride (HCl) |
mg/Nm3 |
1-5 |
TVOC |
3-20 (47) |
The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.
6. DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUES
6.1. Channelled emissions to air
Technique |
Typical pollutant(s) abated |
Description |
Adsorption |
Mercury, volatile organic compounds, hydrogen sulphide, odorous compounds |
Adsorption is a heterogeneous reaction in which gas molecules are retained on a solid or liquid surface that prefers specific compounds to others and thus removes them from effluent streams. When the surface has adsorbed as much as it can, the adsorbent is replaced or the adsorbed content is desorbed as part of the regeneration of the adsorbent. When desorbed, the contaminants are usually at a higher concentration and can either be recovered or disposed of. The most common adsorbent is granular activated carbon. |
Biofilter |
Ammonia, hydrogen sulphide, volatile organic compounds, odorous compounds |
The waste gas stream is passed through a bed of organic material (such as peat, heather, compost, root, tree bark, softwood and different combinations) or some inert material (such as clay, activated carbon, and polyurethane), where it is biologically oxidised by naturally occurring microorganisms into carbon dioxide, water, inorganic salts and biomass. A biofilter is designed considering the type(s) of waste input. An appropriate bed material, e.g. in terms of water retention capacity, bulk density, porosity, structural integrity, is selected. Also important are an appropriate height and surface area of the filter bed. The biofilter is connected to a suitable ventilation and air circulation system in order to ensure a uniform air distribution through the bed and a sufficient residence time of the waste gas inside the bed. |
Condensation and cryogenic condensation |
Volatile organic compounds |
Condensation is a technique that eliminates solvent vapours from a waste gas stream by reducing its temperature below its dew point. For cryogenic condensation, the operating temperature can be down to – 120 °C, but in practice it is often between – 40 °C and – 80 °C in the condensation device. Cryogenic condensation can cope with all VOCs and volatile inorganic pollutants, irrespective of their individual vapour pressures. The low temperatures applied allow for very high condensation efficiencies which make it well-suited as a final VOC emission control technique. |
Cyclone |
Dust |
Cyclone filters are used to remove heavier particulates, which ‘fall out’ as the waste gases are forced into a rotating motion before they leave the separator. Cyclones are used to control particulate material, primarily PM10. |
Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) |
Dust |
Electrostatic precipitators operate such that particles are charged and separated under the influence of an electrical field. Electrostatic precipitators are capable of operating under a wide range of conditions. In a dry ESP, the collected material is mechanically removed (e.g. by shaking, vibration, compressed air), while in a wet ESP it is flushed with a suitable liquid, usually water. |
Fabric filter |
Dust |
Fabric filters, often referred to as bag filters, are constructed from porous woven or felted fabric through which gases are passed to remove particles. The use of a fabric filter requires the selection of a fabric suitable for the characteristics of the waste gas and the maximum operating temperature. |
HEPA filter |
Dust |
HEPA filters (high-efficiency particle air filters) are absolute filters. The filter medium consists of paper or matted glass fibre with a high packing density. The waste gas stream is passed through the filter medium, where particulate matter is collected. |
Thermal oxidation |
Volatile organic compounds |
The oxidation of combustible gases and odorants in a waste gas stream by heating the mixture of contaminants with air or oxygen to above its auto-ignition point in a combustion chamber and maintaining it at a high temperature long enough to complete its combustion to carbon dioxide and water. |
Wet scrubbing |
Dust, volatile organic compounds, gaseous acidic compounds (alkaline scrubber), gaseous alkaline compounds (acid scrubber) |
The removal of gaseous or particulate pollutants from a gas stream via mass transfer to a liquid solvent, often water or an aqueous solution. It may involve a chemical reaction (e.g. in an acid or alkaline scrubber). In some cases, the compounds may be recovered from the solvent. |
6.2. Diffuse emissions of organic compounds to air
Leak detection and repair (LDAR) programme |
Volatile organic compounds |
A structured approach to reduce fugitive emissions of organic compounds by detection and subsequent repair or replacement of leaking components. Currently, sniffing (described by EN 15446) and optical gas imaging methods are available for the identification of leaks. Sniffing method: The first step is the detection using hand-held organic compound analysers measuring the concentration adjacent to the equipment (e.g. using flame ionisation or photo-ionisation). The second step consists of enclosing the component in an impermeable bag to carry out a direct measurement at the source of the emission. This second step is sometimes replaced by mathematical correlation curves derived from statistical results obtained from a large number of previous measurements made on similar components. Optical gas imaging methods: Optical imaging uses small lightweight hand-held cameras which enable the visualisation of gas leaks in real time, so that they appear as ‘smoke’ on a video recorder together with the normal image of the component concerned, to easily and rapidly locate significant organic compound leaks. Active systems produce an image with a back-scattered infrared laser light reflected on the component and its surroundings. Passive systems are based on the natural infrared radiation of the equipment and its surroundings. |
Measurement of diffuse VOC emissions |
Volatile organic compounds |
Sniffing and optical gas imaging methods are described under leak detection and repair programme. Full screening and quantification of emissions from the installation can be undertaken with an appropriate combination of complementary methods, e.g. Solar occultation flux (SOF) or Differential absorption LIDAR (DIAL) campaigns. These results can be used for trend evaluation over time, cross-checking and updating/validation of the ongoing LDAR programme. Solar occultation flux (SOF): The technique is based on the recording and spectrometric Fourier Transform analysis of a broadband infrared or ultraviolet/visible sunlight spectrum along a given geographical itinerary, crossing the wind direction and cutting through VOC plumes. Differential absorption LIDAR (DIAL): This is a laser-based technique using differential absorption LIDAR (light detection and ranging), which is the optical analogue of radio wave-based RADAR. The technique relies on the backscattering of laser beam pulses by atmospheric aerosols, and the analysis of the spectral properties of the returned light collected with a telescope. |
6.3. Emissions to water
Technique |
Typical pollutant(s) targeted |
Description |
Activated sludge process |
Biodegradable organic compounds |
The biological oxidation of dissolved organic pollutants with oxygen using the metabolism of microorganisms. In the presence of dissolved oxygen (injected as air or pure oxygen), the organic components are transformed into carbon dioxide, water or other metabolites and biomass (i.e. the activated sludge). The microorganisms are maintained in suspension in the waste water and the whole mixture is mechanically aerated. The activated sludge mixture is sent to a separation facility from where the sludge is recycled to the aeration tank. |
Adsorption |
Adsorbable dissolved non-biodegradable or inhibitory pollutants, e.g. hydrocarbons, mercury, AOX |
Separation method in which compounds (i.e. pollutants) in a fluid (i.e. waste water) are retained on a solid surface (typically activated carbon). |
Chemical oxidation |
Oxidisable dissolved non-biodegradable or inhibitory pollutants, e.g. nitrite, cyanide |
Organic compounds are oxidised to less harmful and more easily biodegradable compounds. Techniques include wet oxidation or oxidation with ozone or hydrogen peroxide, optionally supported by catalysts or UV radiation. Chemical oxidation is also used to degrade organic compounds causing odour, taste and colour and for disinfection purposes. |
Chemical reduction |
Reducible dissolved non-biodegradable or inhibitory pollutants, e.g. hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) |
Chemical reduction is the conversion of pollutants by chemical reducing agents into similar but less harmful or hazardous compounds. |
Coagulation and flocculation |
Suspended solids and particulate-bound metals |
Coagulation and flocculation are used to separate suspended solids from waste water and are often carried out in successive steps. Coagulation is carried out by adding coagulants with charges opposite to those of the suspended solids. Flocculation is carried out by adding polymers, so that collisions of microfloc particles cause them to bond to produce larger flocs. The flocs formed are subsequently separated by sedimentation, air flotation or filtration. |
Distillation/rectification |
Dissolved non-biodegradable or inhibitory pollutants that can be distilled, e.g. some solvents |
Distillation is a technique to separate compounds with different boiling points by partial evaporation and recondensation. Waste water distillation is the removal of low-boiling contaminants from waste water by transferring them into the vapour phase. Distillation is carried out in columns, equipped with plates or packing material, and a downstream condenser. |
Equalisation |
All pollutants |
Balancing of flows and pollutant loads by using tanks or other management techniques. |
Evaporation |
Soluble pollutants |
The use of distillation (see above) to concentrate aqueous solutions of high-boiling substances for further use, processing or disposal (e.g. waste water incineration) by transferring water to the vapour phase. It is typically carried out in multistage units with increasing vacuum, to reduce the energy demand. The water vapours are condensed, to be reused or discharged as waste water. |
Filtration |
Suspended solids and particulate-bound metals |
The separation of solids from waste water by passing them through a porous medium, e.g. sand filtration, microfiltration and ultrafiltration. |
Flotation |
The separation of solid or liquid particles from waste water by attaching them to fine gas bubbles, usually air. The buoyant particles accumulate at the water surface and are collected with skimmers. |
|
Ion exchange |
Ionic dissolved non-biodegradable or inhibitory pollutants, e.g. metals |
The retention of undesired or hazardous ionic constituents of waste water and their replacement by more acceptable ions using an ion exchange resin. The pollutants are temporarily retained and afterwards released into a regeneration or backwashing liquid. |
Membrane bioreactor |
Biodegradable organic compounds |
A combination of activated sludge treatment and membrane filtration. Two variants are used: a) an external recirculation loop between the activated sludge tank and the membrane module; and b) immersion of the membrane module in the aerated activated sludge tank, where the effluent is filtered through a hollow fibre membrane, the biomass remaining in the tank. |
Membrane filtration |
Suspended solids and particulate-bound metals |
Microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) are membrane filtration processes that retain and concentrate, on one side of the membrane, pollutants such as suspended particles and colloidal particles contained in waste waters. |
Neutralisation |
Acids, alkalis |
The adjustment of the pH of waste water to a neutral level (approximately 7) by the addition of chemicals. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) may be used to increase the pH, whereas sulphuric acid (H2SO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl) or carbon dioxide (CO2) may be used to decrease the pH. The precipitation of some pollutants may occur during neutralisation. |
Nitrification/denitrification |
Total nitrogen, ammonia |
A two-step process that is typically incorporated into biological waste water treatment plants. The first step is aerobic nitrification where microorganisms oxidise ammonium (NH4 +) to the intermediate nitrite (NO2 -), which is then further oxidised to nitrate (NO3 -). In the subsequent anoxic denitrification step, microorganisms chemically reduce nitrate to nitrogen gas. |
Oil-water separation |
Oil/grease |
The separation of oil and water and subsequent oil removal by gravity separation of free oil, using separation equipment or emulsion breaking (using emulsion breaking chemicals such as metal salts, mineral acids, adsorbents and organic polymers). |
Sedimentation |
Suspended solids and particulate-bound metals |
The separation of suspended particles by gravitational settling. |
Precipitation |
Precipitable dissolved non-biodegradable or inhibitory pollutants, e.g. metals, phosphorus |
The conversion of dissolved pollutants into insoluble compounds by adding precipitants. The solid precipitates formed are subsequently separated by sedimentation, air flotation or filtration. |
Stripping |
Purgeable pollutants, e.g. hydrogen sulphide (H2S), ammonia (NH3), some adsorbable organically bound halogens (AOX), hydrocarbons |
The removal of purgeable pollutants from the aqueous phase by a gaseous phase (e.g. steam, nitrogen or air) that is passed through the liquid. They are subsequently recovered (e.g. by condensation) for further use or disposal. The removal efficiency may be enhanced by increasing the temperature or reducing the pressure. |
6.4. Sorting techniques
Technique |
Description |
Air classification |
Air classification (or air separation, or aeraulic separation) is a process of approximate sizing of dry mixtures of different particle sizes into groups or grades at cut points ranging from 10 mesh to sub-mesh sizes. Air classifiers (also called windsifters) complement screens in applications requiring cut points below commercial screen sizes, and supplement sieves and screens for coarser cuts where the special advantages of air classification warrant it. |
All-metal separator |
Metals (ferrous and non-ferrous) are sorted by means of a detection coil, in which the magnetic field is influenced by metal particles, linked to a processor that controls the air jet for ejecting the materials that have been detected. |
Electromagnetic separation of non-ferrous metals |
Non-ferrous metals are sorted by means of eddy current separators. An eddy current is induced by a series of rare earth magnetic or ceramic rotors at the head of a conveyor that spins at high speed independently of the conveyor. This process induces temporary magnetic forces in non-magnetic metals of the same polarity as the rotor, causing the metals to be repelled away and then separated from the other feedstock. |
Manual separation |
Material is manually separated by means of visual examination by staff on a picking line or on the floor, either to selectively remove a target material from a general waste stream or to remove contamination from an output stream to increase purity. This technique generally targets recyclables (glass, plastic, etc.) and any contaminants, hazardous materials and oversized materials such as WEEE. |
Magnetic separation |
Ferrous metals are sorted by means of a magnet which attracts ferrous metal materials. This can be carried out, for example, by an overband magnetic separator or a magnetic drum. |
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) |
Materials are sorted by means of a near-infrared sensor which scans the whole width of the belt conveyor and transmits the characteristic spectra of the different materials to a data processor which controls an air jet for ejecting the materials that have been detected. Generally NIRS is not suitable for sorting black materials. |
Sink-float tanks |
Solid materials are separated into two flows by exploiting the different material densities. |
Size separation |
Materials are sorted according to their particle size. This can be carried out by drum screens, linear and circular oscillating screens, flip-flop screens, flat screens, tumbler screens and moving grates. |
Vibration table |
Materials are separated according to their density and size, moving (in slurry in the case of wet tables or wet density separators) across an inclined table, which oscillates backwards and forwards. |
X-ray systems |
Material composites are sorted according to various material densities, halogen components, or organic components, with the aid of X-rays. The characteristics of the different materials are transmitted to a data processor which controls an air jet for ejecting the materials that have been detected. |
6.5. Management techniques
Accident management plan |
The accident management plan is part of the EMS (see BAT 1) and identifies hazards posed by the plant and the associated risks and defines measures to address these risks. It considers the inventory of pollutants present or likely to be present which could have environmental consequences if they escape. |
Residues management plan |
A residues management plan is part of the EMS (see BAT 1) and is a set of measures aiming to (1) minimise the generation of residues arising from the treatment of waste; (2) optimise the reuse, regeneration, recycling and/or recovery of energy of the residues, and (3) ensure the proper disposal of residues. |
(1) Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment (OJ L 135, 30.5.1991, p. 40).
(2) Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste (OJ L 182, 16.7.1999, p. 1).
(3) Directive (EU) 2015/2193 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from medium combustion plants (OJ L 313, 28.11.2015, p. 1).
(4) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3).
(5) Commission Regulation (EC) No 199/2006 of 3 February 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 466/2001 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs as regards dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (OJ L 32, 4.2.2006, p. 34).
(6) Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles (OJ L 269, 21.10.2000, p. 34).
(7) Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on persistent organic pollutants and amending Directive 79/117/EEC (OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 7).
(8) Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (OJ L 197, 24.7.2012, p. 38).
(9) For any parameter where, due to sampling or analytical limitations, a 30-minute measurement is inappropriate, a more suitable measurement period may be employed (e.g. for the odour concentration). For PCDD/F or dioxin-like PCBs, one sampling period of 6 to 8 hours is used.
(10) Sorting techniques are described in Section 6.4
(11) Monitoring frequencies may be reduced if the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable.
(12) In the case of batch discharge less frequent than the minimum monitoring frequency, monitoring is carried out once per batch.
(13) The monitoring only applies when the substance concerned is identified as relevant in the waste water inventory mentioned in BAT 3.
(14) In the case of an indirect discharge to a receiving water body, the monitoring frequency may be reduced if the downstream waste water treatment plant abates the pollutants concerned.
(15) Either TOC or COD is monitored. TOC is the preferred option, because its monitoring does not rely on the use of very toxic compounds.
(16) The monitoring applies only in the case of a direct discharge to a receiving water body.
(17) Monitoring frequencies may be reduced if the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable.
(18) The monitoring only applies when the substance concerned is identified as relevant in the waste gas stream based on the inventory mentioned in BAT 3.
(19) Instead of EN 1948-1, sampling may also be carried out according to CEN/TS 1948-5.
(20) The odour concentration may be monitored instead.
(21) The monitoring of NH3 and H2S can be used as an alternative to the monitoring of the odour concentration.
(22) The monitoring only applies when solvent is used for cleaning the contaminated equipment.
(23) The descriptions of the techniques are given in Section 6.3.
(24) The averaging periods are defined in the General considerations.
(25) Either the BAT-AEL for COD or the BAT-AEL for TOC applies. TOC monitoring is the preferred option because it does not rely on the use of very toxic compounds.
(26) The upper end of the range may not apply:
— |
when the abatement efficiency is ≥ 95 % as a rolling yearly average and the waste input shows the following characteristics: TOC > 2 g/l (or COD > 6 g/l) as a daily average and a high proportion of refractory organic compounds (i.e. which are difficult to biodegrade); or |
— |
in the case of high chloride concentrations (e.g. above 5 g/l in the waste input). |
(27) The BAT-AEL may not apply to plants treating drilling muds/cuttings.
(28) The BAT-AEL may not apply when the temperature of the waste water is low (e.g. below 12 °C).
(29) The BAT-AEL may not apply in the case of high chloride concentrations (e.g. above 10 g/l in the waste input).
(30) The BAT-AEL only applies when biological treatment of waste water is used.
(31) The BAT-AELs only apply when the substance concerned is identified as relevant in the waste water inventory mentioned in BAT 3.
(32) The upper end of the range is 0,3 mg/l for mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste.
(33) The upper end of the range is 2 mg/l for mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste.
(34) The averaging periods are defined in the General considerations.
(35) The BAT-AELs may not apply if the downstream waste water treatment plant abates the pollutants concerned, provided this does not lead to a higher level of pollution in the environment.
(36) The BAT-AELs only apply when the substance concerned is identified as relevant in the waste water inventory mentioned in BAT 3.
(37) The upper end of the range is 0,3 mg/l for mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste.
(38) The upper end of the range is 2 mg/l for mechanical treatment in shredders of metal waste.
(39) When a fabric filter is not applicable, the upper end of the range is 10 mg/Nm3.
(40) The BAT-AEL only applies when organic compounds are identified as relevant in the waste gas stream, based on the inventory mentioned in BAT 3.
(41) Either the BAT-AEL for NH3 or the BAT-AEL for the odour concentration applies.
(42) This BAT-AEL does not apply to the treatment of waste mainly composed of manure.
(43) The lower end of the range can be achieved by using thermal oxidation.
(44) The BAT-AEL does not apply when the emission load is below 2 kg/h at the emission point provided that no CMR substances are identified as relevant in the waste gas stream, based on the inventory mentioned in BAT 3.
(45) Thermal oxidation is carried out with a minimum temperature of 1 100 °C and a two-second residence time for the regeneration of activated carbon used in industrial applications where refractory halogenated or other thermally resistant substances are likely to be present. In the case of activated carbon used for potable water- and food-grade applications, an afterburner with a minimum heating temperature of 850 °C and a two-second residence time is sufficient (see Section 6.1).
(46) These BAT-AELs only apply when the substance concerned is identified as relevant in the waste gas stream, based on the inventory mentioned in BAT 3.
(47) The upper end of the range is 45 mg/Nm3 when the emission load is below 0,5 kg/h at the emission point.
17.8.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 208/91 |
DECISION (EU) 2018/1148 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
of 10 August 2018
on the eligibility of marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic and repealing Decision (EU) 2016/1041 (ECB/2018/21)
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first indent of Article 127(2) thereof,
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular the first indent of Article 3.1, Article 12.1, Article 18 and the second indent of Article 34.1 thereof,
Having regard to Guideline (EU) 2015/510 of the European Central Bank of 19 December 2014 on the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework (ECB/2014/60) (1) (General Documentation Guideline), and in particular Article 1(4), Titles I, II, IV, V, VI and VIII of Part Four, and Part Six thereof,
Having regard to Guideline ECB/2014/31 of 9 July 2014 on additional temporary measures relating to Eurosystem refinancing operations and eligibility of collateral and amending Guideline ECB/2007/9 (2), and in particular Articles 1(3) and 6(1) and Article 8 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Pursuant to Article 18.1 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of Member States whose currency is the euro may conduct credit operations with credit institutions and other market participants, with lending being based on adequate collateral. |
(2) |
The standard criteria and minimum requirements for credit quality thresholds determining the eligibility of marketable assets as collateral for the purposes of Eurosystem monetary policy operations are laid down in Guideline (EU) 2015/510 (ECB/2014/60) and in particular in Article 59 and in Part Four, Title II thereof. |
(3) |
Pursuant to Article 1(4) of Guideline (EU) 2015/510 (ECB/2014/60), the Governing Council may, at any time, change the tools, instruments, requirements, criteria and procedures for the implementation of Eurosystem monetary policy operations. Pursuant to Article 59(6) of Guideline (EU) 2015/510 (ECB/2014/60), the Eurosystem reserves the right to determine whether an issue, issuer, debtor or guarantor fulfils the Eurosystem's credit quality requirements on the basis of any information that the Eurosystem may consider relevant for ensuring adequate risk protection of the Eurosystem. |
(4) |
By way of derogation from the Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for marketable assets, Article 8(2) of Guideline ECB/2014/31 provides that the Eurosystem's credit quality thresholds do not apply to marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the central governments of euro area Member States under a European Union/International Monetary Fund programme, unless the Governing Council decides that the respective Member State does not comply with the conditionality of the financial support and/or the macroeconomic programme. |
(5) |
On 19 August 2015, following the expiry of the preceding European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) programme of financial support for Greece, the Board of Governors of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) approved the current three-year financial assistance programme for Greece. |
(6) |
The Governing Council assessed the effects of the abovementioned ESM programme for Greece, the continued implementation thereof and the commitment demonstrated by the Greek authorities to fully implement the programme. On the basis of that assessment, the Governing Council considered the Hellenic Republic to be in compliance with the conditionality of the programme. Consequently, on 22 June 2016, the Governing Council adopted Decision (EU) 2016/1041 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2016/18) (3) which restored the eligibility of marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic for Eurosystem monetary policy operations, subject to applying specific haircuts to such instruments, and provided that the Hellenic Republic should be considered a euro area Member State compliant with a European Union/International Monetary Fund programme. |
(7) |
Currently, Article 1(3) of Guideline ECB/2014/31 provides that, for the purposes of Article 6(1) and Article 8 of that Guideline, the Hellenic Republic should be considered a euro area Member State compliant with a European Union/International Monetary Fund programme. Moreover, Article 8(3) of that Guideline provides that marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic are subject to the specific haircuts set out in Annex I to that Guideline. |
(8) |
Pursuant to Article 1 of the Financial Assistance Facility Agreement between the European Stability Mechanism, the Hellenic Republic, the Bank of Greece and the Hellenic Financial Stability Fund dated 19 August 2015 (4), the termination date of the current ESM programme is 20 August 2018. Consequently, from 21 August 2018 the Hellenic Republic can no longer be considered a euro area Member State under a European Union/International Monetary Fund programme. As a result, from that date, the conditions for the temporary suspension of the Eurosystem's credit quality thresholds in respect of marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic, as set out in Article 8(2) of Guideline ECB/2014/31, will no longer be fulfilled. |
(9) |
Therefore, the Governing Council has decided that from 21 August 2018 the Eurosystem's standard criteria and credit quality thresholds should apply in respect of marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic and that such debt instruments will be subject to the standard haircuts set out in Guideline (EU) 2016/65 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2015/35) (5), |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Eligibility of marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic
1. For the purposes of Articles 1(3) and 6(1) and Article 8 of Guideline ECB/2014/31, the Hellenic Republic shall no longer be considered a euro area Member State under a European Union/International Monetary Fund programme.
2. The Eurosystem's minimum requirements for credit quality thresholds, as laid down in Guideline (EU) 2015/510 (ECB/2014/60) and in particular in Article 59 and in Part Four, Title II thereof, shall apply to marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic.
3. Marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic shall no longer be subject to the specific haircuts set out in Annex I to Guideline ECB/2014/31.
Article 2
Repeal
Decision (EU) 2016/1041 (ECB/2016/18) is hereby repealed.
Article 3
Final provisions
1. This Decision shall enter into force on 21 August 2018.
2. In the event of any discrepancy between this Decision and any of Guideline (EU) 2015/510 (ECB/2014/60) and Guideline ECB/2014/31, as implemented at national level by the national central banks of Member States whose currency is the euro, this Decision shall prevail.
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 10 August 2018.
The President of the ECB
Mario DRAGHI
(2) OJ L 240, 13.8.2014, p. 28.
(3) Decision (EU) 2016/1041 of the European Central Bank of 22 June 2016 on the eligibility of marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic and repealing Decision (EU) 2015/300 (ECB/2016/18) (OJ L 169, 28.6.2016, p. 14).
(4) Available on the ESM's website at www.esm.europa.eu
(5) Guideline (EU) 2016/65 of the European Central Bank of 18 November 2015 on the valuation haircuts applied in the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework (ECB/2015/35) (OJ L 14, 21.1.2016, p. 30).
RECOMMENDATIONS
17.8.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 208/94 |
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (EU) 2018/1149
of 10 August 2018
on non-binding guidelines for the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas and other supply chain risks under Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 292 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Natural mineral resources hold great potential for development but can, in conflict-affected or high-risk areas, be a cause of dispute where their revenues fuel the outbreak or continuation of violent conflict, undermining endeavours towards development, good governance and the rule of law. In those areas, breaking the nexus between conflict and illegal exploitation of minerals is a critical element in guaranteeing peace, development and stability. |
(2) |
To address such concerns, Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) lays down supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas; which will apply from 1 January 2021 (hereinafter the ‘Regulation’). |
(3) |
Conflict-affected and high-risk areas for the purposes of that Regulation are defined as areas in a state of armed conflict or fragile post-conflict as well as areas witnessing weak or non-existent governance and security, such as failed states, and widespread and systematic violations of international law, including human rights abuses. |
(4) |
Article 14(1) of that Regulation sets out that in order to create clarity and certainty for and consistency among the practices of economic operators, in particular SMEs, the Commission, in consultation with the European External Action Service and the OECD, is to prepare non-binding guidelines for economic operators, explaining how best to apply the criteria for the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas (hereinafter the ‘Guidelines’). |
(5) |
That Article also sets out that these Guidelines are to be based on the definition of conflict-affected and high-risk areas set out in the Regulation and are to take into account the OECD Due Diligence Guidance in this field, including other supply chain risks triggering red flags as defined in the relevant supplements to that Guidance. |
(6) |
These Guidelines, to be effective, should set out the general concept of due diligence in supply chains of minerals and metals associated with conflict-affected and high-risk areas and the steps companies should take to identify and address the risks in this regard relating to the sourcing of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold. |
(7) |
It should be recalled that the Regulation's requirements for Union importers do not only relate to metals and minerals originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas, but also to associated risks along the upstream chain with regard to, e.g. trading, handling and exporting. |
(8) |
These Guidelines should also explain the key principles of the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas for the specific purpose of implementing the Regulation, while the definition and explanation of such areas are without prejudice to the Union's position on what may constitute conflict-affected and high-risk areas outside the context of that Regulation. |
(9) |
Reference to relevant open-source information that economic operators can use in identifying conflict-affected and high-risk areas should be a central part of these Guidelines, while recalling that relevant sources are updated with varying periodicity and should be complemented with other sources as appropriate. |
(10) |
Other supply chain risks triggering red flags addressed by these Guidelines should relate to location, suppliers and unusual circumstances of trading operations and should be based on the OECD's work in this field. |
(11) |
Article 14(2) of the Regulation sets out that the Commission is to call on external expertise that will provide an indicative, non-exhaustive, regularly updated list of conflict-affected and high-risk areas. That forthcoming list is to be based on the external experts' analysis of these Guidelines and other existing information from, inter alia, academics and supply chain due diligence schemes. |
(12) |
These Guidelines are non-binding and Union importers maintain their responsibility to comply with the due diligence obligations under the Regulation, while the services of the Commission ensure that these Guidelines remain relevant over time, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:
1. |
Union importers with obligations under Regulation (EU) 2017/821 should follow the non-binding guidelines provided in the Annex to this Recommendation. Following these Guidelines will help them to identify conflict-affected and high-risk areas and red flags adequately so as to properly meet the requirements of that Regulation when they apply from 1 January 2021. The guidelines can be followed also by other entities applying due diligence to their mineral supply chain. |
2. |
This Recommendation will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
Done at Brussels, 10 August 2018.
For the Commission
Cecilia MALMSTRÖM
Member of the Commission
(1) Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 laying down supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas (OJ L 130, 19.5.2017, p. 1).
ANNEX
1. OBJECTIVE OF THESE GUIDELINES
Regulation (EU) 2017/821 (hereinafter ‘the Regulation’) entered into force on 8 June 2017 and applies to Union importers (1) (including but not limited to smelters and refiners) as from 1 January 2021. As set out in its first Article, the Regulation is designed to provide transparency and certainty as regards the sourcing practices of Union importers sourcing from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.
According to Article 14(1) of the Regulation, the European Commission is tasked with the preparation of non-binding guidelines in the form of a handbook for economic operators, explaining how best to apply the criteria for the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas. This Article also sets out that the guidelines are to take into account the OECD Due Diligence Guidance (2) in this field, including other supply chain risks triggering the so-called ‘red flags’ , as defined in the relevant supplements to that Guidance.
In these guidelines,
— |
SECTION 2 sets out the general concept of due diligence in supply chains of minerals originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas and the steps companies should take to identify and address the risks associated with sourcing of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold. |
— |
SECTION 3 explains the key elements of the definition of conflict-affected and high-risk areas for the purposes of the Regulation. |
— |
SECTION 4 lists open source information to help companies identify conflict-affected and high-risk areas and other risks. |
— |
SECTION 5 provides information on other indicators of potential risks (or ‘red flags’ ) in the mineral supply chain in relation to location, suppliers, and unusual circumstances of trading operations. |
These guidelines are designed to help EU importers carry out their supply chain due diligence. They are without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2017/821 and are not legally binding.
Furthermore, it should be noted that pursuant to Article 14(2) of the Regulation, the European Commission will (subsequently) call upon external expertise that will provide an indicative, non-exhaustive, regularly updated list of conflict-affected and high-risk areas. That list will be based on the external experts' analysis of these guidelines and existing information from, inter alia, governments, international organisations, academics and supply chain due diligence schemes.
2. DUE DILIGENCE IN THE MINERAL SUPPLY CHAIN — GENERAL CONCEPT AND STEPS
2.1. The concept of risk-based due diligence
In conflict-affected and high-risk areas, companies involved in mining, processing and trade in minerals have the potential to generate income, growth and prosperity, sustain livelihoods and foster local development. In such situations, companies may also be at risk of contributing to or being associated with significant adverse impacts associated with their activities or sourcing decisions, including armed conflict and serious human rights abuses. In this perspective, to ensure that companies do not intentionally or unintentionally contribute to or become (or continue to be) associated with these adverse impacts, they should conduct risk-based due diligence as part of an on-going, proactive and reactive process firmly integrated into their management system.
Generally, risk-based due diligence refers to the steps companies should take to identify and address actual or potential risks in their mineral supply chain in order to prevent or mitigate any contribution to adverse impacts related to the extraction, production, trading, processing, handling and export of minerals associated with conflict-affected and high-risk areas. Risks are defined in relation to the potentially adverse impacts of a given company's operations, which result from the company's own activities or which may be directly linked to operations, products or services by its business relationships with third parties, including suppliers and other entities in the supply chain. Adverse impacts may include harm to people (i.e. external impacts), reputational damage or legal liability for the company (i.e. internal impacts), or both.
Companies may face risks in their mineral supply chains because the circumstances of mineral extraction, production, trading, handling or export by their very nature carry a higher risk of having significant adverse impacts, such as financing conflict or fuelling, facilitating or exacerbating conditions of conflict as outlined in Annex II of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance and its supplements.
Because of these risks, companies should make good faith efforts to identify and assess location, supplier or circumstantial-related risks and put in place due diligence measures adapted to the specific requirements of such risks. Due diligence can also help companies ensure they observe international law and comply with domestic laws, including those governing illicit trade in mineral resources as well as UN sanctions and EU Decisions based on the Treaty of the European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in particular restrictive measures pursuant to Article 215 TFEU.
The overall objective of the Regulation, which is based on the principles set forth in the OECD Guidance, is to enable the development of secure, transparent and verifiable supply chains of minerals and to ensure, facilitate and promote the responsible importation into the EU of minerals and metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas without contributing to armed conflict and associated human rights abuses, thereby contributing to economic development and the livelihood of local communities.
2.2. Due diligence — five-step framework
Risk-based due diligence as recommended by the OECD Due Diligence Guidance is structured around the following five steps, all of which are also enshrined in the Regulation.
Companies along the supply chain should:
— |
Establish a strong management system and adopt and clearly communicate to suppliers and the public their policy for the minerals and metals potentially originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. This includes the identification of the factual circumstances involved in the extraction, transport, handling, trading, processing, smelting, refining, and alloying, manufacturing, or selling of products that contain minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. (Article 4 of the Regulation) |
— |
Identify and assess any actual or potential risks in the supply chain (3). (Article 5(1)(a) of the Regulation) |
— |
Design and implement a strategy to respond to the identified risks in order to prevent or mitigate them by adopting and implementing a risk management plan. This may result in deciding to continue trade throughout the course of the risk mitigation efforts, temporarily suspend trade while pursuing ongoing risk mitigation, or disengage with a supplier either after failed attempts at mitigation or if the supplier is committing serious human rights abuses (e.g. worst forms of child labour, forced labour, and torture) or providing direct or indirect support to non-state armed groups. (Article 5(1)(b) of the Regulation) |
— |
Carry out or obtain an independent third-party audit of the company's activities, processes and systems used to implement supply chain due diligence at identified points in the supply chain, in particular regarding the due diligence practices of smelters and refiners. (Article 6 of the Regulation) |
— |
Publicly report on supply chain due diligence policies and practices in order to generate public confidence in the measures companies are taking. (Article 7 of the Regulation). |
3. UNDERSTANDING THE DEFINITION OF CONFLICT-AFFECTED AND HIGH-RISK AREAS
The definition of conflict-affected and high-risk areas applied in the Regulation is in line with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance as to what characterises such areas and is without prejudice to the EU's position on what may constitute conflict-affected and high-risk areas outside the context of the Regulation. It is solely provided for the purpose of supply chain due diligence with regard to the metals and minerals in scope of the Regulation and it is designed to be practical, thorough and easily understood by companies.
Definition of conflict-affected and high-risk areas in the Regulation (Article 2(f)):
‘Areas in a state of armed conflict or fragile post-conflict as well as areas witnessing weak or non-existing governance and security, such as failed states, and widespread and systematic violations of international law, including human rights abuses.’
This definition follows some key principles set out in international law, including ‘state of armed conflict’, ‘fragile post-conflict’ and ‘failed states’. These principles are further illustrated and explained below to facilitate their practical understanding as part of the responsible supply chain management by companies.
Moreover, these key principles should allow for easy matching with open source information on the situation on the ground in conflict-affected and high-risk areas, and assist companies with the broader identification of risks in their supply chain and the potential impact of their operations (cf. section 4).
It should be recalled that the supply chain due diligence foreseen in the Regulation — as well as in the OECD Due Dilignce Guidance — is tied to identifying and assessing the risks of adverse impacts of certain business operations and relationships relating to metals and minerals originating in or being transported through conflict-affected and high-risk areas (which can be sub-national). Country-related information can provide contextual information to identify the general level of diligence needed.
Key element of the definition |
Explanation |
State of armed conflict |
Presence of armed conflict, widespread violence or other risks of harm to people as decribed under international humanitarian law, which regulates the conduct of armed conflict by combatants. Armed conflict may take a variety of forms, such as a conflict of international or non-international character, which may involve two or more states, or may consist of wars of liberation, or insurgencies, civil wars, etc. Specific guidance on the ‘state of armed conflict’ is provided in the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and includes all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more Parties, even if the state of war is not recognised by one of them; all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory of a Party, even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance. Pursuant to Protocol II (1977) additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, they do not apply to situations of internal disturbances and tensions, such as riots, isolated and sporadic acts of violence and other acts of a similar nature. |
Fragile post-conflict areas Areas witnessing weak or non-existent governance and security, such as failed states, and widespread and systematic violations of international law, including human rights abuses. |
Fragile post-conflict areas are areas witnessing cessation of active hostilities and that are in a state of fragility, meaning that the region or state has a weak capacity to carry out basic governance functions and lacks the ability to develop mutually constructive relations within society due to the prior conflictual state. Such areas are more vulnerable to internal or external shocks such as economic crises or natural disasters. In such cases, as in cases covered by the subsequent paragraph of the definition (i.e. areas witnessing weak or non-existing governance and security), economic operators need to ascertain that there is either institutional weakness or lack of governance and widespread and systematic violations of international law and human rights abuses in order to make a determination that the area is a conflict-affected and high-risk area. Thus, the condition of the violations of international law is a cumulative one to the conditions of fragile post-conflict areas and areas witnessing weak or non-existing governance and security. On the latter, the absence of a formal mining licensing procedure would for instance constitute evidence of lack of governance. |
Failed states |
A ‘failed state’ is an illustration of a situation of extreme institutional weakness. A failed state involves an implosion of structures of power and authority, a collapse of law and order and the absence of institutions capable of representing the state. |
4. OPEN SOURCE INFORMATION TO IDENTIFY CONFLICT-AFFECTED AND HIGH-RISK AREAS
This section includes an indicative, non-exhaustive list of relevant open-source information to help companies identify conflict-affected and high-risk areas. By understanding the national and regional context as well as the potential risks involved in areas they operate in or source from, companies will be in a position to better tailor their due diligence efforts accordingly. Such more general country specific information can also be beneficial in assessing the plausibility of allegations of misconduct.
The listed open-source information is grouped according to the key elements set out in the definition of conflict-affected and high-risk areas (cf. section 3):
— |
CONFLICT — allowing for the assessment of whether an area is in a ‘state of armed conflict’ or is a ‘fragile post-conflict’ area. |
— |
GOVERNANCE — allowing for the assessment of the extent to which areas witness weak or non-existent governance and security. |
— |
HUMAN RIGHTS — allowing for the assessment of whether an area is affected by widespread and systematic violations of international law, including human rights abuses (4). |
In addition, the list provided in section 4.2 includes information sources on mineral resources, for context.
4.1. How to best use the information sources
The listed information sources are of a non-commercial nature, i.e. not requiring subscription fees or any financial contribution. Companies should consider whether that sources provide updated information while using them. The Regulation sets out that in addition to these guidelines, the European Commission is to call upon external expertise that will provide an indicative, non-exhaustive, regularly updated list of conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The European Commission's services will together with such external expertise ensure to update as appropriate the list of information sources to ensure its continued relevance.
Additional sources of a more general nature (some of which are not explicitly mentioned in the list below) that are useful to consult include geological surveys with information on mineral resources (British and U.S. Geological Surveys), the European Commission's Raw Material Information System, the websites of leading organisations on this issue such as the U.S. State Department Country Reports (Governance and Human Rights), reports published by the different UN agencies (including the Human Rights Council, UNHCR, OHCHR, UNICEF, UNDP, ILO, and IOM) and other relevant civil society organisations, for instance Amnesty International, Global Witness, Human Rights Watch and IMPACT (the former Partnership Africa Canada). The websites of other organisations and information sources such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, Natural Resource Governance Index, Global Peace Index, etc. may also be consulted by companies for more topical, news-based information.
It would also be useful to consult national or regional sources. Although sometimes more difficult to access, national/regional sources allow for a more in-depth review of the situation in a specific area compared with aggregate country information.
Companies consulting these sources can proceed as follows:
1. |
On the basis of the supply chain information retained in their management system (step 1 of the five-step framework, cf. section 2), companies should first seek to identify their geographical areas of mineral sourcing, trading, handling and transportation with a view to understanding the context in which the mining and trading activities take place and identify the related risks. |
2. |
To this end, companies can consult the open sources (i.e. analytical sources, maps/tables and news items) listed below covering the three key elements of the definition of conflicted-affected and high-risk areas (i.e. conflict, governance and human rights) to understand the political and security context, and identify and assess the potential risks of adverse impacts of their supply chain against their supply chain policy which are to be consistent with Annex II of the OECD Guidance, and the ‘red flags’ set out in its supplements. |
3. |
In case the sources listed below provide contradictory or inconclusive information, companies should exercise caution before dismissing an area from enhanced due diligence procedures. It should be stressed again that the responsibility of due diligence is tied to identifying and addressing actual or potential risks in order to prevent or mitigate adverse impacts of operations in particular sourcing, trade and business relationships as well as other circumstances associated with companies' activities and not only to the country or area of origin of the mineral. |
4. |
The sources listed below are updated with varying periodicity and while being relevant may not always be fully accurate. They should therefore be used in combination and with the addition of complementary sources as appropriate. Once the abovementioned indicative, non-exhaustive, regularly updated list of conflict-affected and high-risk areas to be provided by external expertise is available, it will provide an addition source of information. |
4.2. List of open information sources
Issue for assessment |
Coverage |
Open sources |
Content of the sources |
CONFLICT |
Global |
Analytical sources |
|
Heidelberg Conflict Barometer http://www.hiik.de/?lang=en/ |
Analysis of the most recent global conflict events in the form of texts and graphics; separate regional and individual country chapters. |
||
Geneva Academy Rule of Law in Armed Conflicts http://www.rulac.org/ |
Database and analysis reporting on the implementation of international law in armed conflicts around the world (global coverage and brief overviews). |
||
Assessment Capacities Project — Global Emergency Overview https://www.acaps.org/countries/ |
World map and country specific analysis providing overview and analysis of countries in ‘situation of concern’, ‘humanitarian crisis’, and ‘severe humanitarian crisis’. |
||
Maps or tables |
|||
Uppsala Conflict Data Programme — Georeferenced Event Dataset http://www.ucdp.uu.se/ged/ |
Interactive map of events of organised violence based on news sources; including fatalities, type of violence (state-based, non-state, one-sided), the user can zoom to a level of unique events. |
||
CrisisWatch http://www.crisisgroup.org |
State of play in most significant global situations of conflict/potential conflict; interactive map and database allowing to assess the situation in selected country cases 2003-2018. |
||
Global Peace Index http://www.visionofhumanity.org |
Interactive map that measures global peace according to qualitative and quantitative indicators (security officers and police, political instability, organised conflict, armed services personnel, etc.). |
||
Major Episodes of Political Violence http://www.systemicpeace.org |
Maps and tables listing e.g. episodes of armed conflict (including casualties) in the world from 1946-2017. |
||
Regional |
Armed Conflict Location and Event Data http://www.acleddata.com/ |
Conflict trend reports and analysis including monthly updates on political violence in Africa, Middle East and Asia based on real-time data, and analysing current and historical dynamics in specific states. |
|
International Peace Information Service — Conflict Mapping http://ipisresearch.be/ |
Maps of Democratic Republic of Congo (conflict/conflict minerals), Central African Republic, Sudan-South Sudan (contested areas, incidents, natural resources, education, community violence, intrastate and interstate violence); analysis of maps is provided. |
||
International Tin Association https://www.internationaltin.org/ http://www.itsci.org/ |
Tin Supply Chain Initiative (iTSCi) provides assessment reports of the security situation of mines sites in Rwanda, Eastern provinces of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Burundi and Uganda. |
||
Mining Conflicts in Latin America http://ejatlas.org/featured/mining-latam |
The environmental justice atlas documents and catalogues social conflict around environmental issues for contextual information. |
||
GOVER-NANCE |
Global |
Worldwide Governance Indicators http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi |
Dataset of updated aggregate and individual governance indicators for specific countries, six dimensions of governance; country data reports summarise indicators per country. |
Fragile States Index http://ffp.statesindex.org |
Index focusing on indicators of risk, based on news articles and reports. |
||
Corruption Perception Index http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview |
Index of the perceived corruption in countries. |
||
National Resource Governance Institute https://resourcegovernance.org/ |
Country specific information and comparative analysis on issues relating to governance of natural resources. |
||
HUMAN RIGHTS |
Global |
United Nations Security Council Resolutions (UNSC) http://www.un.org/en/sc/documents/resolutions |
UNSC Resolutions provide a useful description of the political and security situation in countries of concern on an annual basis. |
United Nations Human Rights Council http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/AboutCouncil.aspx |
Universal, periodic reviews. |
||
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights http://www.ohchr.org/EN/pages/home.aspx |
Country specific information on human rights issues. |
||
United Nations Development Programme — International Human Development Indicators — Country Profiles http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries |
Annual country reports of country-specific human rights practices, global coverage. |
||
Amnesty International https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/ |
|
||
Global Witness https://www.globalwitness.org/en-gb/ |
|
||
Human Rights Watch https://www.hrw.org/ |
|
||
Mines and Communities http://www.minesandcommunities.org/ |
News articles and analyses of global mining and its impacts; classified by theme, country, company, minerals. |
||
MINERAL RESOURCES AND PRODUCTION |
Global |
British Geological Survey https://www.bgs.ac.uk/mineralsuk/statistics/worldStatistics.html |
Country reports on international minerals statistics and information. |
U.S. Geological Survey http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/country/ |
Country reports on international minerals statistics and information. |
||
EU Raw Materials Information System http://rmis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ |
Information on production, trade flows and policy relating to raw materials. |
In addition to the abovementioned open information sources, it is expected that the OECD will provide additional information of relevance to identify conflict-affected and high-risk areas (http://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/mining.htm). Risks related to humanitarian crises and disasters can also provide contextual information and point to areas where armed conflicts may emerge. In this regard, INFORM is a useful source (a collaborative project between the Inter-Agency Standing Committee and the European Commission; http://www.inform-index.org). Another useful tool in this regard is the Global Conflict Risk index (an open-source evidence base to support decision-making on long-term conflict risks developed by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission; http://conflictrisk.jrc.ec.europa.eu/).
Moreover, the European Commission will make available support to SME's in their efforts to put in place and implement policies on responsible sourcing of minerals through the COSME programme, which is expected to partly relate to the identification of conflict-affected and high-risk areas under Regulation (EU) 2017/821.
5. RISK ASSESSMENT OF MINERAL SUPPLY CHAINS — ‘RED FLAGS’ FOR ENHANCED DUE DILIGENCE
5.1. Introduction to red flags and general considerations
The due diligence process set out by the Regulation and the OECD Due Diligence Guidance is not limited to the identification and mitigation of risks in relation to the origin and transportation of minerals in conflict-affected and high-risk areas. Indeed, companies are to consider and provide information on the risks pursuant to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance in relation to the trading, handling and exporting of minerals along the upstream supply chain, and unusual circumstances.
To this end, supplements of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance provide a list of the so called ‘red flag’ situations that trigger the need for enhanced due diligence, including the collection of additional information through the company's management system, in particular in the following situations:
A. |
Red flag locations of minerals origin and transit
|
B. |
Supplier red flags
|
C. |
Red flag circumstances
|
5.2. Identifying specific red flags and ensuring appropriate due diligence
Following the identification of the ‘red-flags’ set out in section 5.1 as part of the company's risk assessment, companies should undertake an in-depth review of the context of all these ‘red-flags’ by collecting additional information through their company's management system and ensuring that the corresponding risks are duly taken into account.
As highlighted in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, due diligence is a risk-based and progressive approach whereby companies must put in place adequate management systems and processes, map the factual circumstances along the supply chain and identify the risks that may lead them to undertake enhanced due diligence.
The following guidance should assist companies to obtain the relevant information on ‘red flag’ situations and tailor their due diligence appropriately. It should be noted that the information sources provided are updated with varying periodicity and while being relevant may not always be fully accurate. They should therefore be used in combination and with the addition of complementary sources as appropriate.
A. |
Red flag locations of minerals origin and transit
|
B. |
Supplier red flags
|
C. |
Red flag circumstances
|
(1) As set out in Article 2(l) of Regulation (EU) 2017/821 ‘Union importer’ means any natural or legal person declaring minerals or metals for release for free circulation within the meaning of Article 201(1) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1) or any natural or legal person on whose behalf such declaration is made, as indicated in data elements 3/15 and 3/16 in accordance with Annex B to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 of 28 July 2015 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards detailed rules concerning certain provisions of the Union Customs Code (OJ L 343, 29.12.2015, p. 1).
(2) The OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (Second Edition, OECD 2013) is the framework to conduct supply chain due diligence pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2017/821.
(3) Risks as set out in Annex II of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, including risks triggered by ‘red flags’ as defined in its supplements.
(4) For the definition of human rights, see the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
(5) Information should be updated regularly, as appropriate.
(6) http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/RBA%20for%20Dealers%20in%20Precious%20Metal%20and%20Stones.pdf
(7) http://www.fintrac-canafe.gc.ca/guidance-directives/compliance-conformite/rba/rba-dpms-eng.asp