ISSN 1977-0677 |
||
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 40 |
|
English edition |
Legislation |
Volume 60 |
|
|
Corrigenda |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
(1) Text with EEA relevance. |
EN |
Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
II Non-legislative acts
REGULATIONS
17.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 40/1 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/268
of 14 February 2017
concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (1), and in particular Articles 57(4) and 58(2) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
In order to ensure uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature annexed to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (2), it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the classification of the goods referred to in the Annex to this Regulation. |
(2) |
Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 has laid down the general rules for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature. Those rules apply also to any other nomenclature which is wholly or partly based on it or which adds any additional subdivision to it and which is established by specific provisions of the Union, with a view to the application of tariff and other measures relating to trade in goods. |
(3) |
Pursuant to those general rules, the goods described in column (1) of the table set out in the Annex should be classified under the CN code indicated in column (2), by virtue of the reasons set out in column (3) of that table. |
(4) |
It is appropriate to provide that binding tariff information issued in respect of the goods concerned by this Regulation which does not conform to this Regulation may, for a certain period, continue to be invoked by the holder in accordance with Article 34(9) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. That period should be set at three months. |
(5) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The goods described in column (1) of the table set out in the Annex shall be classified within the Combined Nomenclature under the CN code indicated in column (2) of that table.
Article 2
Binding tariff information which does not conform to this Regulation may continue to be invoked in accordance with Article 34(9) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 for a period of three months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Article 3
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 14 February 2017.
For the Commission,
On behalf of the President,
Stephen QUEST
Director-General
Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union
(1) OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1.
(2) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).
ANNEX
Description of goods |
Classification (CN Code) |
Reasons |
||||||||
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
||||||||
A product consisting of white tablets composed of the following:
200 tablets (each of 56 mg) put up for retail sale in a pocket dispenser. The product has a caloric value of 0,06 kcal per tablet. |
2106 90 92 |
Classification is determined by general rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, Note 1(b) to Chapter 38 and the wording of CN codes 2106 , 2106 90 and 2106 90 92 . In accordance with Note 1(b) to Chapter 38, the product cannot be regarded as a chemical product of Chapter 38 as it contains substances with nutritive value, of a kind used in the preparation of foodstuffs. There is no threshold for the amount of the nutritive value. Steviol glycosides and leucine are regarded as substances with nutritive value (see also the Harmonized System Explanatory Notes (HSEN) to Chapter 38, General, antepenultimate and penultimate paragraph). Preparations (such as tablets) consisting of a sweetener and a foodstuff used for sweetening purposes should be classified under heading 2106 (see also the HSEN to heading 2106 , number 10). The product is therefore to be classified under heading 2106 as other food preparation of CN code 2106 90 92 . |
17.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 40/4 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2017/269
of 16 February 2017
amending Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning statistics on pesticides, as regards the list of active substances
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 concerning statistics on pesticides (1), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 establishes a common framework for producing comparable European statistics on the sales and use of pesticides. |
(2) |
The Commission should adapt, on a regular basis and at least every five years, the list of substances to be covered and their classification in categories of products and chemical classes as set out in Annex III. As the latter was last updated in 2011 by Commission Regulation (EU) No 656/2011 (2), the list annexed to that Regulation needs to be updated to cover the years from 2016 to 2020. |
(3) |
Given the number of substances concerned and the complex process of identifying and classifying the relevant compounds, it is difficult for the national statistical authorities to acquire the array of tools they need to collect information on use and placing on the market of pesticides. Consequently, only substances assigned an identification number by one or both of the two major internationally recognised institutions that register chemical compounds or pesticides, the Chemical Abstracts Service of the American Chemical Society and the Collaborative International Pesticides Analytical Council, should be included. |
(4) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the European Statistical System Committee, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 is replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 February 2017.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude JUNCKER
(1) OJ L 324, 10.12.2009, p. 1.
(2) Commission Regulation (EU) No 656/2011 of 7 July 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning statistics on pesticides, as regards definitions and list of active substances (OJ L 180, 8.7.2011, p. 3).
ANNEX
‘ANNEX III
HARMONISED CLASSIFICATION OF SUBSTANCES
Major groups |
Categories of products |
Code |
Chemical Class |
Substances common names Common nomenclature |
CAS (1) |
CIPAC (2) |
Fungicides and Bactericides |
|
PES_F |
|
|
|
|
|
Inorganic fungicides |
F01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F01_01 |
COPPER COMPOUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
F01_01_01 |
|
BORDEAUX MIXTURE |
8011-63-0 |
44.604 |
|
|
F01_01_02 |
|
COPPER HYDROXIDE |
20427-59-2 |
44.305 |
|
|
F01_01_03 |
|
COPPER (I) OXIDE |
1319-39-1 |
44.603 |
|
|
F01_01_04 |
|
COPPER OXYCHLORIDE |
1332-40-7 |
44.602 |
|
|
F01_01_05 |
|
TRIBASIC COPPER SULFATE |
1333-22-8 |
44.606 |
|
|
F01_01_06 |
|
OTHER COPPER SALTS |
|
44 |
|
|
F01_02 |
INORGANIC SULFUR |
|
|
|
|
|
F01_02_01 |
|
SULFUR |
7704-34-9 |
18 |
|
|
F01_99 |
OTHER INORGANIC FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F01_99_01 |
|
LIME SULFUR (CALCIUM POLYSULFID) |
1344-81-6 |
17 |
|
|
F01_99_03 |
|
POTASSIUM PHOSPHONATES (FORMERLY POTASSIUM PHOSPHITE) |
13977-65-6 13492-26-7 |
756 |
|
|
F01_99_06 |
|
DISODIUM PHOSPHONATE |
|
808 |
|
|
F01_99_07 |
|
POTASSIUM HYDROGEN CARBONATE |
298-14-6 |
853 |
|
|
F01_99_99 |
|
OTHER INORGANIC FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
Fungicides based on carbamates and dithiocarbamates |
F02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F02_01 |
CARBANILATE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F02_01_01 |
|
DIETHOFENCARB |
87130-20-9 |
513 |
|
|
F02_02 |
CARBAMATE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F02_02_01 |
|
BENTHIAVALICARB-ISOPROPYL |
413615-35-7 177406-68-7 |
744 |
|
|
F02_02_02 |
|
IPROVALICARB |
140923-17-7 |
620 |
|
|
F02_02_03 |
|
PROPAMOCARB |
24579-73-5 |
399 |
|
|
F02_03 |
DITHIOCARBAMATE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F02_03_01 |
|
MANCOZEB |
8018-01-7 |
34 |
|
|
F02_03_02 |
|
MANEB |
12427-38-2 |
61 |
|
|
F02_03_03 |
|
METIRAM |
9006-42-2 |
478 |
|
|
F02_03_04 |
|
PROPINEB |
12071-83-9 |
177 |
|
|
F02_03_05 |
|
THIRAM |
137-26-8 |
24 |
|
|
F02_03_06 |
|
ZIRAM |
137-30-4 |
31 |
|
|
F02_99 |
OTHER FUNGICIDES BASED ON CARBAMATES AND DITHIOCARBAMATES |
|
|
|
|
|
F02_99_99 |
|
OTHER FUNGICIDES BASED ON CARBAMATES AND DITHIOCARBAMATES |
|
|
|
Fungicides based on benzimidazoles |
F03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F03_01 |
BENZIMIDAZOLE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F03_01_01 |
|
CARBENDAZIM |
10605-21-7 |
263 |
|
|
F03_01_02 |
|
FUBERIDAZOLE |
3878-19-1 |
525 |
|
|
F03_01_03 |
|
THIABENDAZOLE |
148-79-8 |
323 |
|
|
F03_01_04 |
|
THIOPHANATE-METHYL |
23564-05-8 |
262 |
|
|
F03_99 |
OTHER FUNGICIDES BASED ON BENZIMIDAZOLES |
|
|
|
|
|
F03_99_99 |
|
OTHER FUNGICIDES BASED ON BENZIMIDAZOLES |
|
|
|
Fungicides based on imidazoles and triazoles |
F04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F04_01 |
CONAZOLE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F04_01_02 |
|
BROMUCONAZOLE |
116255-48-2 |
680 |
|
|
F04_01_03 |
|
CYPROCONAZOLE |
94361-06-5 |
600 |
|
|
F04_01_04 |
|
DIFENOCONAZOLE |
119446-68-3 |
687 |
|
|
F04_01_05 |
|
EPOXICONAZOLE |
106325-08-0 |
609 |
|
|
F04_01_06 |
|
ETRIDIAZOLE |
2593-15-9 |
518 |
|
|
F04_01_07 |
|
FENBUCONAZOLE |
114369-43-6 |
694 |
|
|
F04_01_08 |
|
FLUQUINCONAZOLE |
136426-54-5 |
474 |
|
|
F04_01_10 |
|
FLUTRIAFOL |
76674-21-0 |
436 |
|
|
F04_01_11 |
|
IMAZALIL (ENILCONAZOLE) |
35554-44-0 |
335 |
|
|
F04_01_12 |
|
IPCONAZOLE |
125225-28-7 |
798 |
|
|
F04_01_13 |
|
METCONAZOLE |
125116-23-6 |
706 |
|
|
F04_01_14 |
|
MYCLOBUTANIL |
88671-89-0 |
442 |
|
|
F04_01_15 |
|
PENCONAZOLE |
66246-88-6 |
446 |
|
|
F04_01_16 |
|
PROPICONAZOLE |
60207-90-1 |
408 |
|
|
F04_01_17 |
|
PROTHIOCONAZOLE |
178928-70-6 |
745 |
|
|
F04_01_18 |
|
TEBUCONAZOLE |
107534-96-3 |
494 |
|
|
F04_01_19 |
|
TETRACONAZOLE |
112281-77-3 |
726 |
|
|
F04_01_20 |
|
TRIADIMENOL |
55219-65-3 |
398 |
|
|
F04_01_21 |
|
TRIFLUMIZOLE |
99387-89-0 |
730 |
|
|
F04_01_22 |
|
TRITICONAZOLE |
131983-72-7 |
652 |
|
|
F04_02 |
IMIDAZOLE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F04_02_01 |
|
CYAZOFAMID |
120116-88-3 |
653 |
|
|
F04_02_02 |
|
FENAMIDONE |
161326-34-7 |
650 |
|
|
F04_02_03 |
|
TRIAZOXIDE |
72459-58-6 |
729 |
|
|
F04_99 |
OTHER FUNGICIDES BASED ON IMIDAZOLES AND TRIAZOLES |
|
|
|
|
|
F04_99_01 |
|
AMETOCTRADIN |
865318-97-4 |
818 |
|
|
F04_99_02 |
|
AMISULBROM |
348635-87-0 |
789 |
|
|
F04_99_03 |
|
TRICYCLAZOLE |
41814-78-2 |
547 |
|
|
F04_99_99 |
|
OTHER FUNGICIDES BASED ON IMIDAZOLES AND TRIAZOLES |
|
|
|
Fungicides based on morpholines |
F05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F05_01 |
MORPHOLINE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F05_01_01 |
|
DIMETHOMORPH |
110488-70-5 |
483 |
|
|
F05_01_02 |
|
DODEMORPH |
1593-77-7 |
300 |
|
|
F05_01_03 |
|
FENPROPIMORPH |
67564-91-4 |
427 |
|
|
F05_99 |
OTHER FUNGICIDES BASED ON MORPHOLINES |
|
|
|
|
|
F05_99_99 |
|
OTHER FUNGICIDES BASED ON MORPHOLINES |
|
|
|
Fungicides of microbiological or botanical origin |
F06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F06_01 |
MICROBIOLOGICAL FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F06_01_01 |
|
AMPELOMYCES QUISQUALIS STRAIN AQ10 |
|
589 |
|
|
F06_01_02 |
|
AUREOBASIDIUM PULLULANS (STRAINS DSM 14940-1) |
|
809, 810 |
|
|
F06_01_03 |
|
BACILLUS SUBTILIS STR. QST 713 |
|
661 |
|
|
F06_01_04 |
|
CONIOTHYRIUM MINITANS |
|
614 |
|
|
F06_01_05 |
|
GLIOCLADIUM CATENULATUM STRAIN J1446 |
|
624 |
|
|
F06_01_08 |
|
PSEUDOMONAS CHLORORAPHIS STRAIN MA342 |
|
574 |
|
|
F06_01_09 |
|
PSEUDOZYMA FLOCCULOSA |
|
669 |
|
|
F06_01_11 |
|
TRICHODERMA HARZIANUM RIFAI (T-22) (ITEM 908) |
|
816 |
|
|
F06_01_12 |
|
CANDIDA OLEOPHILA STRAIN O |
|
946 |
|
|
F06_01_14 |
|
PHLEBIOPSIS GIGANTEA (SEVERAL STRAINS) |
|
921, 922, 923, 924, 925, 926, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934 |
|
|
F06_01_15 |
|
PSEUDOMONAS SP. STRAIN DSMZ 13134 |
|
935 |
|
|
F06_01_16 |
|
PYTHIUM OLIGANDRUM (M1) |
|
936 |
|
|
F06_01_17 |
|
STREPTOMYCES K61 (K61) (FORMERLY STREPTOMYCES GRISEOVIRIDIS) |
|
937 |
|
|
F06_01_18 |
|
TRICHODERMA ASPELLERUM (ICC012) (T25) (TV1) (FORMERLY T. HARZIANUM) |
|
938, 939, 940 |
|
|
F06_01_19 |
|
TRICHODERMA ASPERELLUM (STRAIN T34) |
|
941 |
|
|
F06_01_20 |
|
TRICHODERMA ATROVIRIDE (IMI 206040) (T 11) (FORMERLY TRICHODERMA HARZIANUM) |
|
942, 943 |
|
|
F06_01_21 |
|
TRICHODERMA ATROVIRIDE STRAIN I-1237 |
|
944 |
|
|
F06_01_22 |
|
TRICHODERMA GAMSII (FORMERLY T. VIRIDE) (ICC080) |
|
945 |
|
|
F06_01_23 |
|
TRICHODERMA POLYSPORUM (IMI 206039) |
|
946 |
|
|
F06_01_24 |
|
VERTICILLIUM ALBO-ATRUM (WCS850) (FORMERLY VERTICILLIUM DAHLIAE) |
|
948 |
|
|
F06_01_25 |
|
BACILLUS AMYLOLIQUEFACIENS MBI 600 |
|
|
|
|
F06_01_26 |
|
BACILLUS AMYLOLIQUEFACIENS STRAIN FZB24 |
|
|
|
|
F06_01_27 |
|
SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE STRAIN LAS02 |
|
|
|
|
F06_01_28 |
|
TRICHODERMA ATROVIRIDE STRAIN SC1 |
|
|
|
|
F06_01_29 |
|
BACILLUS AMYLOLIQUEFACIENS SUBSP.PLANTARUM D747 |
|
|
|
|
F06_01_30 |
|
BACILLUS PUMILUS QST 2808 |
|
|
|
|
F06_02 |
BOTANICAL FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F06_02_01 |
|
EUGENOL |
97-53-0 |
|
|
|
F06_02_02 |
|
GERANIOL |
106-24-1 |
|
|
|
F06_02_03 |
|
THYMOL |
89-83-8 |
900 |
|
|
F06_02_04 |
|
EXTRACT FROM TEA TREE |
68647-73-4 |
914 |
|
|
F06_02_05 |
|
LAMINARIN |
9008-22-4 |
671 |
|
|
F06_02_06 |
|
FEN 560 |
|
858 |
|
|
F06_02_07 |
|
REYNOUTRIA SACCHALINENSIS EXTRACT |
|
|
|
|
F06_99 |
OTHER FUNGICIDES OF MICROBIOLOGICAL OR BOTANICAL ORIGIN |
|
|
|
|
|
F06_99_01 |
|
CEREVISANE |
|
980 |
|
Bactericides |
F07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F07_01 |
INORGANIC BACTERICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F07_01_01 |
|
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE |
7681-52-9 |
848 |
|
|
F07_01_02 |
|
ALUMINIUM SULFATE |
10043-01-3 |
849 |
|
|
F07_99 |
OTHER BACTERICIDES |
|
|
|
|
Other fungicides and bactericides |
F99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F99_01 |
ALIPHATIC NITROGEN FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_01_01 |
|
CYMOXANIL |
57966-95-7 |
419 |
|
|
F99_01_02 |
|
DODINE |
2439-10-3 |
101 |
|
|
F99_02 |
AMIDE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_02_01 |
|
CYFLUFENAMID |
180409-60-3 |
759 |
|
|
F99_02_02 |
|
FLUOPICOLIDE |
239110-15-7 |
787 |
|
|
F99_02_03 |
|
PROCHLORAZ |
67747-09-5 |
407 |
|
|
F99_02_04 |
|
SILTHIOFAM |
175217-20-6 |
635 |
|
|
F99_02_05 |
|
ZOXAMIDE |
156052-68-5 |
640 |
|
|
F99_02_06 |
|
MANDIPROPAMID |
374726-62-2 |
783 |
|
|
F99_02_07 |
|
PENTHIOPYRAD |
183675-82-3 |
824 |
|
|
F99_02_08 |
|
BENZOVINDIFLUPYR |
1072957-71-1 |
981 |
|
|
F99_02_09 |
|
ISOFETAMID |
875915-78-9 |
972 |
|
|
F99_02_10 |
|
MANDESTROBIN |
173662-97-0 |
|
|
|
F99_02_11 |
|
FLUOPYRAM |
658066-35-4 |
807 |
|
|
F99_03 |
ANILIDE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_03_01 |
|
BENALAXYL |
71626-11-4 |
416 |
|
|
F99_03_02 |
|
BOSCALID |
188425-85-6 |
673 |
|
|
F99_03_03 |
|
CARBOXIN |
5234-68-4 |
273 |
|
|
F99_03_04 |
|
FENHEXAMID |
126833-17-8 |
603 |
|
|
F99_03_05 |
|
FLUTOLANIL |
66332-96-5 |
524 |
|
|
F99_03_06 |
|
METALAXYL-M |
70630-17-0 |
580 |
|
|
F99_03_07 |
|
METALAXYL |
57837-19-1 |
365 |
|
|
F99_03_08 |
|
BENALAXYL-M |
98243-83-5 |
766 |
|
|
F99_03_09 |
|
BIXAFEN |
581809-46-3 |
819 |
|
|
F99_03_12 |
|
ISOPYRAZAM |
881685-58-1 |
963 |
|
|
F99_03_13 |
|
FLUXAPYROXAD |
907204-31-3 |
828 |
|
|
F99_03_14 |
|
PENFLUFEN |
494793-67-8 |
826 |
|
|
F99_03_15 |
|
SEDAXANE |
874967-67-6 |
833 |
|
|
F99_05 |
AROMATIC FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_05_01 |
|
CHLOROTHALONIL |
1897-45-6 |
288 |
|
|
F99_05_03 |
|
2,5-DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID METHYLESTER |
2905-69-3 |
686 |
|
|
F99_06 |
DICARBOXIMIDE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_06_01 |
|
IPRODIONE |
36734-19-7 |
278 |
|
|
F99_07 |
DINITROANILINE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_07_01 |
|
FLUAZINAM |
79622-59-6 |
521 |
|
|
F99_08 |
DINITROPHENOL FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_08_02 |
|
MEPTYLDINOCAP |
131-72-6 |
811 |
|
|
F99_09 |
ORGANOPHOSPHORUS FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_09_01 |
|
FOSETYL-AL |
15845-66-6 |
384 |
|
|
F99_09_02 |
|
TOLCLOFOS-METHYL |
57018-04-9 |
479 |
|
|
F99_10 |
OXAZOLE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_10_01 |
|
FAMOXADONE |
131807-57-3 |
594 |
|
|
F99_10_02 |
|
HYMEXAZOL |
10004-44-1 |
528 |
|
|
F99_11 |
PHENYLPYRROLE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_11_01 |
|
FLUDIOXONIL |
131341-86-1 |
522 |
|
|
F99_12 |
PHTHALIMIDE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_12_01 |
|
CAPTAN |
133-06-2 |
40 |
|
|
F99_12_02 |
|
FOLPET |
133-07-3 |
75 |
|
|
F99_13 |
PYRIMIDINE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_13_01 |
|
BUPIRIMATE |
41483-43-6 |
261 |
|
|
F99_13_02 |
|
CYPRODINIL |
121552-61-2 |
511 |
|
|
F99_13_03 |
|
MEPANIPYRIM |
110235-47-7 |
611 |
|
|
F99_13_04 |
|
PYRIMETHANIL |
53112-28-0 |
714 |
|
|
F99_14 |
QUINOLINE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_14_01 |
|
8-HYDROXYQUINOLINE SULFATE (8-HYDROXYQUINOLINE INCL. OXYQUINOLEINE) |
134-31-6 |
677 |
|
|
F99_14_02 |
|
QUINOXYFEN |
124495-18-7 |
566 |
|
|
F99_15 |
QUINONE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_15_01 |
|
DITHIANON |
3347-22-6 |
153 |
|
|
F99_16 |
STROBILURINE FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_16_01 |
|
AZOXYSTROBIN |
131860-33-8 |
571 |
|
|
F99_16_02 |
|
DIMOXYSTROBIN |
149961-52-4 |
739 |
|
|
F99_16_03 |
|
FLUOXASTROBIN |
361377-29-9 |
746 |
|
|
F99_16_04 |
|
KRESOXIM-METHYL |
143390-89-0 |
568 |
|
|
F99_16_05 |
|
PICOXYSTROBINE |
117428-22-5 |
628 |
|
|
F99_16_06 |
|
PYRACLOSTROBINE |
175013-18-0 |
657 |
|
|
F99_16_07 |
|
TRIFLOXYSTROBINE |
141517-21-7 |
617 |
|
|
F99_17 |
UREA FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_17_01 |
|
PENCYCURON |
66063-05-6 |
402 |
|
|
F99_17_02 |
|
UREA |
57-13-6 |
913 |
|
Unclassified fungicides |
F99_99 |
UNCLASSIFIED FUNGICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
F99_99_01 |
|
2-PHENYLPHENOL |
90-43-7 |
246 |
|
|
F99_99_02 |
|
ACIBENZOLAR -S-METHYL |
126448-41-7 |
597 |
|
|
F99_99_04 |
|
ASCORBIC ACID |
|
774 |
|
|
F99_99_05 |
|
BENZOIC ACID |
65-85-0 |
622 |
|
|
F99_99_06 |
|
FENPROPIDIN |
67306-00-7 |
520 |
|
|
F99_99_08 |
|
METRAFENONE |
220899-03-6 |
752 |
|
|
F99_99_09 |
|
PYRIOFENONE |
688046-61-9 |
827 |
|
|
F99_99_10 |
|
SPIROXAMINE |
118134-30-8 |
572 |
|
|
F99_99_12 |
|
PROQUINAZID |
189278-12-4 |
764 |
|
|
F99_99_13 |
|
VALIFENALATE (FORMERLY VALIPHENAL) |
|
857 |
|
|
F99_99_14 |
|
DIMETHYL DISULPHIDE |
624-92-0 |
|
|
|
F99_99_15 |
|
COS-OGA |
|
979 |
|
|
F99_99_16 |
|
FLUTIANIL |
958647-10-4 |
835 |
|
|
F99_99_17 |
|
FENPYRAZAMINE |
473798-59-3 |
832 |
|
|
F99_99_99 |
|
OTHER FUNGICIDES, NOT CLASSIFIED |
|
|
Herbicides. Haulm Destructors and Moss Killers |
|
PES_H |
|
|
|
|
|
Herbicides based on phenoxy-phytohormones |
H01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H01_01 |
PHENOXY HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H01_01_01 |
|
2,4-D |
94-75-7 |
1 |
|
|
H01_01_02 |
|
2,4-DB |
94-82-6 |
83 |
|
|
H01_01_03 |
|
DICHLORPROP-P |
15165-67-0 |
476 |
|
|
H01_01_04 |
|
MCPA |
94-74-6 |
2 |
|
|
H01_01_05 |
|
MCPB |
94-81-5 |
50 |
|
|
H01_01_06 |
|
MECOPROP |
7085-19-0 |
51 |
|
|
H01_01_07 |
|
MECOPROP-P |
16484-77-8 |
475 |
|
|
H01_99 |
OTHER HERBICIDES BASED ON PHENOXY-PHYTOHORMONES |
|
|
|
|
|
H01_99_99 |
|
OTHER HERBICIDES BASED ON PHENOXY-PHYTOHORMONES |
|
|
|
Herbicides based on triazines and triazinones |
H02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H02_02 |
TRIAZINE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H02_02_01 |
|
TERBUTHYLAZINE |
5915-41-3 |
234 |
|
|
H02_03 |
TRIAZINONE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H02_03_01 |
|
METAMITRON |
41394-05-2 |
381 |
|
|
H02_03_02 |
|
METRIBUZIN |
21087-64-9 |
283 |
|
|
H02_99 |
OTHER HERBICIDES BASED ON TRIAZINES AND TRIAZINONES |
|
|
|
|
|
H02_99_99 |
|
OTHER HERBICIDES BASED ON TRIAZINES AND TRIAZINONES |
|
|
|
Herbicides based on amides and anilides |
H03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H03_01 |
AMIDE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H03_01_01 |
|
BEFLUBUTAMID |
113614-08-7 |
662 |
|
|
H03_01_02 |
|
DIMETHENAMID-P |
163515-14-8 |
638 |
|
|
H03_01_03 |
|
ISOXABEN |
82558-50-7 |
701 |
|
|
H03_01_04 |
|
NAPROPAMIDE |
15299-99-7 |
271 |
|
|
H03_01_05 |
|
PENOXSULAM |
219714-96-2 |
758 |
|
|
H03_01_06 |
|
PETHOXAMIDE |
106700-29-2 |
665 |
|
|
H03_01_07 |
|
PROPYZAMIDE |
23950-58-5 |
315 |
|
|
H03_01_08 |
|
PYROXSULAM |
422556-08-9 |
793 |
|
|
H03_02 |
ANILIDE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H03_02_01 |
|
DIFLUFENICAN |
83164-33-4 |
462 |
|
|
H03_02_02 |
|
FLORASULAM |
145701-23-1 |
616 |
|
|
H03_02_03 |
|
FLUFENACET |
142459-58-3 |
588 |
|
|
H03_02_04 |
|
METAZACHLOR |
67129-08-2 |
411 |
|
|
H03_02_05 |
|
METOSULAM |
139528-85-1 |
707 |
|
|
H03_03 |
CHLOROACETANILIDE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H03_03_02 |
|
DIMETHACHLOR |
50563-36-5 |
688 |
|
|
H03_03_04 |
|
S-METOLACHLOR |
87392-12-9 |
607 |
|
|
H03_99 |
OTHER HERBICIDES BASED ON AMIDES AND ANILIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H03_99_99 |
|
OTHER HERBICIDES BASED ON AMIDES AND ANILIDES |
|
|
|
Herbicides based on carbamates and bis-carbamates |
H04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H04_01 |
BIS-CARBAMATE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H04_01_01 |
|
CHLORPROPHAM |
101-21-3 |
43 |
|
|
H04_01_02 |
|
DESMEDIPHAM |
13684-56-5 |
477 |
|
|
H04_01_03 |
|
PHENMEDIPHAM |
13684-63-4 |
77 |
|
|
H04_02 |
CARBAMATE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H04_02_02 |
|
CARBETAMIDE |
16118-49-3 |
95 |
|
|
H04_99 |
OTHER HERBICIDES BASED ON CARBAMATES AND BIS-CARBAMATES |
|
|
|
|
|
H04_99_99 |
|
OTHER HERBICIDES BASED ON CARBAMATES AND BIS-CARBAMATES |
|
|
|
Herbicides based on dinitroaniline derivatives |
H05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H05_01 |
DINITROANILINE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H05_01_01 |
|
BENFLURALIN |
1861-40-1 |
285 |
|
|
H05_01_02 |
|
PENDIMETHALIN |
40487-42-1 |
357 |
|
|
H05_01_03 |
|
ORYZALIN |
19044-88-3 |
537 |
|
|
H05_99 |
OTHER HERBICIDES BASED ON DINITROANILINE DERIVATIVES |
|
|
|
|
|
H05_99_99 |
|
OTHER HERBICIDES BASED ON DINITROANILINE DERIVATIVES |
|
|
|
Herbicides based on derivatives of urea, of uracil or of sulfonylurea |
H06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H06_01 |
SULFONYLUREA HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H06_01_01 |
|
AMIDOSULFURON |
120923-37-7 |
515 |
|
|
H06_01_02 |
|
AZIMSULFURON |
120162-55-2 |
584 |
|
|
H06_01_03 |
|
BENSULFURON-METHYL |
99283-01-9 83055-99-6 |
502 |
|
|
H06_01_04 |
|
CHLORSULFURON |
64902-72-3 |
391 |
|
|
H06_01_06 |
|
FLAZASULFURON |
104040-78-0 |
595 |
|
|
H06_01_07 |
|
FLUPYRSULFURON-METHYL |
150315-10-9 144740-54-5 |
577 |
|
|
H06_01_08 |
|
FORAMSULFURON |
173159-57-4 |
659 |
|
|
H06_01_09 |
|
IMAZOSULFURON |
122548-33-8 |
590 |
|
|
H06_01_10 |
|
IODOSULFURON-METHYL-SODIUM |
144550-36-7 |
634.501 |
|
|
H06_01_11 |
|
MESOSULFURON-METHYL |
400852-66-6 208465-21-8 |
663 |
|
|
H06_01_12 |
|
METSULFURON-METHYL |
74223-64-6 |
441 |
|
|
H06_01_13 |
|
NICOSULFURON |
111991-09-4 |
709 |
|
|
H06_01_14 |
|
OXASULFURON |
144651-06-9 |
626 |
|
|
H06_01_15 |
|
PROSULFURON |
94125-34-5 |
579 |
|
|
H06_01_16 |
|
RIMSULFURON |
122931-48-0 |
716 |
|
|
H06_01_17 |
|
SULFOSULFURON |
141776-32-1 |
601 |
|
|
H06_01_18 |
|
THIFENSULFURON-METHYL |
79277-67-1 79227-27-3 |
452 |
|
|
H06_01_19 |
|
TRIASULFURON |
82097-50-5 |
480 |
|
|
H06_01_20 |
|
TRIBENURON-METHYL |
106040-48-6 101200-48-0 |
546 |
|
|
H06_01_21 |
|
TRIFLUSULFURON |
135990-29-3 126535-15-7 |
731 |
|
|
H06_01_22 |
|
TRITOSULFURON |
142469-14-5 |
735 |
|
|
H06_01_23 |
|
ORTHOSULFAMURON |
213464-77-8 |
781 |
|
|
H06_01_24 |
|
ETHAMETSULFURON-METHYL |
97780-06-8 |
834.201 |
|
|
H06_01_25 |
|
HALOSULFURON METHYL |
100784-20-1 |
785 |
|
|
H06_02 |
URACIL HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H06_02_01 |
|
LENACIL |
2164-08-1 |
163 |
|
|
H06_03 |
UREA HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H06_03_01 |
|
CHLOROTOLURON |
15545-48-9 |
217 |
|
|
H06_03_02 |
|
DIURON |
330-54-1 |
100 |
|
|
H06_03_03 |
|
FLUOMETURON |
2164-17-2 |
159 |
|
|
H06_03_04 |
|
ISOPROTURON |
34123-59-6 |
336 |
|
|
H06_03_05 |
|
LINURON |
330-55-2 |
76 |
|
|
H06_03_06 |
|
METOBROMURON |
3060-89-7 |
168 |
|
|
H06_99 |
OTHER HERBICIDES BASED ON DERIVATIVES OF UREA, OF URACIL OR OF SULFONYLUREA |
|
|
|
|
|
H06_99_99 |
|
OTHER HERBICIDES BASED ON DERIVATIVES OF UREA, OF URACIL OR OF SULFONYLUREA |
|
|
|
Other herbicides |
H99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H99_01 |
ARYLOXYPHENOXY- PROPIONIC HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_01_01 |
|
CLODINAFOP-PROPARGYL |
114420-56-3 105512-06-9 |
683 |
|
|
H99_01_02 |
|
CYHALOFOP-BUTYL |
122008-85-9 |
596 |
|
|
H99_01_03 |
|
DICLOFOP-METHYL |
40843-25-2 257-141-8 |
358 |
|
|
H99_01_04 |
|
FENOXAPROP-P-ETHYL |
113158-40-0 71283-80-2 |
484 |
|
|
H99_01_05 |
|
FLUAZIFOP-P-BUTYL |
79241-46-6 |
467 |
|
|
H99_01_06 |
|
HALOXYFOP-P |
95977-29-0 |
526 |
|
|
H99_01_07 |
|
PROPAQUIZAFOP |
111479-05-1 |
713 |
|
|
H99_01_08 |
|
QUIZALOFOP-P |
94051-08-8 |
641 |
|
|
H99_01_09 |
|
QUIZALOFOP-P-ETHYL |
100646-51-3 |
641.202 |
|
|
H99_01_10 |
|
QUIZALOFOP-P-TEFURYL |
119738-06-6 |
641.226 |
|
|
H99_02 |
BENZOFURANE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_02_01 |
|
ETHOFUMESATE |
26225-79-6 |
233 |
|
|
H99_03 |
BENZOIC-ACID HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_03_01 |
|
DICAMBA |
1918-00-9 |
85 |
|
|
H99_04 |
BIPYRIDYLIUM HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_04_01 |
|
DIQUAT |
85-00-7 |
55 |
|
|
H99_05 |
CYCLOHEXANEDIONE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_05_01 |
|
CLETHODIM |
99129-21-2 |
508 |
|
|
H99_05_02 |
|
CYCLOXYDIM |
101205-02-1 |
510 |
|
|
H99_05_03 |
|
PROFOXYDIM |
139001-49-3 |
621 |
|
|
H99_05_04 |
|
TEPRALOXYDIM |
149979-41-9 |
608 |
|
|
H99_05_05 |
|
TRALKOXYDIM |
87820-88-0 |
544 |
|
|
H99_06 |
DIAZINE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_06_01 |
|
PYRIDATE |
55512-33-9 |
447 |
|
|
H99_07 |
DICARBOXIMIDE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_07_02 |
|
FLUMIOXAZIN |
103361-09-7 |
578 |
|
|
H99_08 |
DIPHENYL ETHER HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_08_01 |
|
ACLONIFEN |
74070-46-5 |
498 |
|
|
H99_08_02 |
|
BIFENOX |
42576-02-3 |
413 |
|
|
H99_08_03 |
|
OXYFLUORFEN |
42874-03-3 |
538 |
|
|
H99_09 |
IMIDAZOLINONE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_09_01 |
|
IMAZAMOX |
114311-32-9 |
619 |
|
|
H99_10 |
INORGANIC HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_10_01 |
|
IRON SULFATE |
7720-78-7 17375-41-6 7782-63-0 |
837 |
|
|
H99_11 |
ISOXAZOLE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_11_01 |
|
ISOXAFLUTOLE |
141112-29-0 |
575 |
|
|
H99_11_02 |
|
TOPRAMEZONE |
210631-68-8 |
800 |
|
|
H99_13 |
NITRILE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_13_01 |
|
BROMOXYNIL OCTANOATE AND/OR HEPTANOATE |
1689-84-5 1689-99-2 56634-95-8 |
87 |
|
|
H99_13_03 |
|
IOXYNIL |
1689-83-4 3861-47-0 |
86 |
|
|
H99_14 |
ORGANOPHOSPHORUS HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_14_01 |
|
GLUFOSINATE-AMMONIUM |
51276-47-2 77182-82-2 |
437 |
|
|
H99_14_02 |
|
GLYPHOSATE |
1071-83-6 |
284 |
|
|
H99_15 |
PHENYLPYRAZOLE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_15_01 |
|
PINOXADEN |
243973-20-8 |
776 |
|
|
H99_15_02 |
|
PYRAFLUFEN-ETHYL |
129630-19-9 |
605 |
|
|
H99_16 |
PYRIDAZINONE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_16_01 |
|
CHLORIDAZON |
1698-60-8 |
111 |
|
|
H99_16_02 |
|
FLURTAMONE |
96525-23-4 |
569 |
|
|
H99_17 |
PYRIDINECARBOXAMIDE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_17_01 |
|
PICOLINAFEN |
137641-05-5 |
639 |
|
|
H99_18 |
PYRIDINECARBOXYLIC-ACID HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_18_01 |
|
CLOPYRALID MONOETHANOLAMIN SALT |
1702-17-6 57754-85-5 |
455 |
|
|
H99_18_02 |
|
PICLORAM |
1918-02-1 |
174 |
|
|
H99_18_03 |
|
HALAUXIFEN-METHYL |
943831-98-9 |
970 |
|
|
H99_18_04 |
|
AMINOPYRALID |
150114-71-9 |
771 |
|
|
H99_19 |
PYRIDYLOXYACETIC-ACID HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_19_02 |
|
FLUROXYPYR |
69377-81-7 |
431 |
|
|
H99_19_03 |
|
TRICLOPYR |
55335-06-3 |
376 |
|
|
H99_20 |
QUINOLINE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_20_01 |
|
QUINMERAC |
90717-03-6 |
563 |
|
|
H99_21 |
THIADIAZINE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_21_01 |
|
BENTAZONE |
25057-89-0 |
366 |
|
|
H99_22 |
THIOCARBAMATE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_22_01 |
|
MOLINATE |
2212-67-1 |
235 |
|
|
H99_22_02 |
|
PROSULFOCARB |
52888-80-9 |
539 |
|
|
H99_22_03 |
|
TRI-ALLATE |
2303-17-5 |
97 |
|
|
H99_23 |
TRIAZOLE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_23_01 |
|
AMITROLE |
61-82-5 |
90 |
|
|
H99_24 |
TRIAZOLINONE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_24_01 |
|
CARFENTRAZONE-ETHYL |
128639-02-1 |
587.202 |
|
|
H99_25 |
TRIAZOLONE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_25_01 |
|
PROPOXYCARBAZONE-SODIUM |
145026-81-9 181274-15-7 |
655 |
|
|
H99_25_02 |
|
THIENCARBAZONE-METHYL |
936331-72-5 317815-83-1 |
797 |
|
|
H99_26 |
TRIKETONE HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_26_01 |
|
MESOTRIONE |
104206-82-8 |
625 |
|
|
H99_26_02 |
|
SULCOTRIONE |
99105-77-8 |
723 |
|
|
H99_26_03 |
|
TEMBOTRIONE |
335104-84-2 |
790 |
|
Unclassified herbicides |
H99_99 |
UNCLASSIFIED HERBICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
H99_99_01 |
|
ACETIC ACID |
64-19-7 |
838 |
|
|
H99_99_02 |
|
BISPYRIBAC SODIUM |
125401-92-5 |
748.011 |
|
|
H99_99_03 |
|
CLOMAZONE |
81777-89-1 |
509 |
|
|
H99_99_04 |
|
FLUROCHLORIDONE |
61213-25-0 |
430 |
|
|
H99_99_06 |
|
OXADIAZON |
19666-30-9 |
213 |
|
|
H99_99_07 |
|
PELARGONIC ACID |
112-05-0 |
888 |
|
|
H99_99_08 |
|
QUINOCLAMINE |
2797-51-5 |
648 |
|
|
H99_99_99 |
|
OTHER HERBICIDES HAULM DESTRUCTOR MOSS KILLER |
|
|
Insecticides and Acaricides |
|
PES_I |
|
|
|
|
|
Insecticides based on pyrethroids |
I01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I01_01 |
PYRETHROID INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I01_01_01 |
|
ACRINATHRIN |
101007-06-1 |
678 |
|
|
I01_01_02 |
|
ALPHA-CYPERMETHRIN |
67375-30-8 |
454 |
|
|
I01_01_03 |
|
BETA-CYFLUTHRIN |
68359-37-5 |
482 |
|
|
I01_01_04 |
|
BIFENTHRIN |
82657-04-3 |
415 |
|
|
I01_01_06 |
|
CYPERMETHRIN |
52315-07-8 |
332 |
|
|
I01_01_07 |
|
DELTAMETHRIN |
52918-63-5 |
333 |
|
|
I01_01_08 |
|
ESFENVALERATE |
66230-04-4 |
481 |
|
|
I01_01_09 |
|
ETOFENPROX |
80844-07-1 |
471 |
|
|
I01_01_10 |
|
GAMMA-CYHALOTHRIN |
76703-62-3 |
768 |
|
|
I01_01_11 |
|
LAMBDA-CYHALOTHRIN |
91465-08-6 |
463 |
|
|
I01_01_12 |
|
TAU-FLUVALINATE |
102851-06-9 |
786 |
|
|
I01_01_13 |
|
TEFLUTHRIN |
79538-32-2 |
451 |
|
|
I01_01_14 |
|
ZETA-CYPERMETHRIN |
52315-07-8 |
733 |
|
|
I01_01_15 |
|
BETA-CYPERMETHRIN |
65731-84-2 72204-43-4 65732-07-2 83860-31-5 |
632 |
|
|
I01_99 |
OTHER INSECTICIDES BASED ON PYRETHROIDS |
|
|
|
|
|
I01_99_99 |
|
OTHER INSECTICIDES BASED ON PYRETHROIDS |
|
|
|
Insecticides based on chlorinated hydrocarbons |
I02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I02_01 |
ANTHRANILIC DIAMIDE INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I02_01_01 |
|
CYANTRANILIPROLE |
|
|
|
|
I02_99 |
OTHER INSECTICIDES BASED ON CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS |
|
|
|
|
|
I02_99_99 |
|
OTHER INSECTICIDES BASED ON CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS |
|
|
|
Insecticides based on carbamates and oxime-carbamate |
I03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I03_01 |
OXIME-CARBAMATE INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I03_01_01 |
|
METHOMYL |
16752-77-5 |
264 |
|
|
I03_01_02 |
|
OXAMYL |
23135-22-0 |
342 |
|
|
I03_02 |
CARBAMATE INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I03_02_01 |
|
FENOXYCARB |
79127-80-3 |
425 |
|
|
I03_02_02 |
|
FORMETANATE-HYDROCHLORIDE |
22259-30-9 23422-53-9 |
697 |
|
|
I03_02_03 |
|
METHIOCARB |
2032-65-7 |
165 |
|
|
I03_02_04 |
|
PIRIMICARB |
23103-98-2 |
231 |
|
|
I03_99 |
OTHER INSECTICIDES BASED ON CARBAMATE AND OXIME-CARBAMATE |
|
|
|
|
|
I03_99_99 |
|
OTHER INSECTICIDES BASED ON CARBAMATE AND OXIME-CARBAMATE |
|
|
|
Insecticides based on organophosphates |
I04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I04_01 |
ORGANOPHOSPHORUS INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I04_01_01 |
|
CHLORPYRIFOS |
2921-88-2 |
221 |
|
|
I04_01_02 |
|
CHLORPYRIFOS-METHYL |
5589-13-0 |
486 |
|
|
I04_01_03 |
|
DIMETHOATE |
60-51-5 |
59 |
|
|
I04_01_04 |
|
ETHOPROPHOS |
13194-48-4 |
218 |
|
|
I04_01_07 |
|
MALATHION |
121-75-5 |
12 |
|
|
I04_01_08 |
|
PHOSMET |
732-11-6 |
318 |
|
|
I04_01_09 |
|
PIRIMIPHOS-METHYL |
29232-93-7 |
239 |
|
|
I04_99 |
OTHER INSECTICIDES BASED ON ORGANOPHOSPHATES |
|
|
|
|
|
I04_99_99 |
|
OTHER INSECTICIDES BASED ON ORGANOPHOSPHATES |
|
|
|
Insecticides of microbiological or botanical origin |
I05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I05_01 |
MICROBIOLOGICAL INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I05_01_01 |
|
ADOXOPHYES ORANA GV STRAIN BV-0001 |
|
782 |
|
|
I05_01_03 |
|
BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS SUBSP. ISRAELENSIS (AM65-52) |
|
770 |
|
|
I05_01_04 |
|
METARHIZIUM ANISOPLIAE VAR. ANISOPLIAE STRAIN BIPESCO 5F/52 |
|
784 |
|
|
I05_01_05 |
|
PAECILOMYCES FUMOSOROSEUS STRAIN FE9901 |
|
778 |
|
|
I05_01_08 |
|
BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS SUBSP. AIZAWAI (ABTS-1857 AND GC-91) |
|
949, 950 |
|
|
I05_01_09 |
|
BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS SUBSP. KURSTAKI (ABTS 351, PB 54, SA 11, SA12 AND EG 2348) |
|
951, 952, 953, 954, 955 |
|
|
I05_01_10 |
|
BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS SUBSP. TENEBRIONIS (NB 176) |
|
956 |
|
|
I05_01_11 |
|
BEAUVERIA BASSIANA (ATCC 74040 AND GHA) |
|
957, 958 |
|
|
I05_01_12 |
|
CYDIA POMONELLA GRANULOSIS VIRUS (CPGV) |
|
959 |
|
|
I05_01_13 |
|
HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA NUCLEOPOLYHEDROVIRUS (HEARNPV) |
|
960 |
|
|
I05_01_14 |
|
LECANICILLIMUM MUSCARIUM (VE6) (FORMERLY VERTICILLIUM LECANII) |
|
961 |
|
|
I05_01_15 |
|
SPODOPTERA LITTORALIS NUCLEOPOLYHEDROVIRUS |
|
962 |
|
|
I05_01_16 |
|
BEAUVERIA BASSIANA STRAIN 147 |
|
|
|
|
I05_01_17 |
|
BEAUVERIA BASSIANA STRAIN NPP11B005 |
|
|
|
|
I05_01_18 |
|
ISARIA FUMOSOROSEA APOPKA STRAIN 97 (FORMELY PAECILOMYCES FUMOSOROSEUS) |
|
573 |
|
|
I05_01_19 |
|
SPODOPTERA EXIGUA NUCLEAR POLYHEDROSIS VIRUS |
|
592 |
|
|
I05_02 |
BOTANICAL INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I05_02_01 |
|
ORANGE OIL |
|
902 |
|
|
I05_02_02 |
|
TAGETES OIL |
|
903 |
|
|
I05_02_03 |
|
AZADIRACHTIN |
11141-17-6 |
627 |
|
|
I05_02_04 |
|
PYRETHRINS |
8003-34-7 |
32 |
|
|
I05_99 |
OTHER INSECTICIDES OF MICROBIOLOGICAL OR BOTANICAL ORIGIN |
|
|
|
|
|
I05_99_99 |
|
OTHER INSECTICIDES OF MICROBIOLOGICAL OR BOTANICAL ORIGIN |
|
|
|
Acaricides |
I06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I06_01 |
PYRAZOLE ACARICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I06_01_01 |
|
FENPYROXIMATE |
134098-61-6 |
695 |
|
|
I06_02 |
TETRAZINE ACARICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I06_02_01 |
|
CLOFENTEZINE |
74115-24-5 |
418 |
|
|
I06_99 |
OTHER ACARICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I06_99_01 |
|
ACEQUINOCYL |
57960-19-7 |
760 |
|
|
I06_99_02 |
|
CYFLUMETOFEN |
400882-07-7 |
821 |
|
|
I06_99_99 |
|
OTHER ACARICIDES |
|
|
|
Other insecticides |
I99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I99_01 |
INSECTICIDES PRODUCED BY FERMENTATION |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_01_01 |
|
ABAMECTIN |
71751-41-2 |
495 |
|
|
I99_01_02 |
|
MILBEMECTIN |
51596-10-2 51596-11-3 |
660 |
|
|
I99_01_03 |
|
SPINOSAD |
168316-95-8 |
636 |
|
|
I99_01_04 |
|
EMAMECTIN |
155569-91-8 |
791 |
|
|
I99_01_05 |
|
SPINETORAM |
187166-40-1 |
802 |
|
|
I99_03 |
BENZOYLUREA INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_03_01 |
|
DIFLUBENZURON |
35367-38-5 |
339 |
|
|
I99_03_03 |
|
LUFENURON |
103055-07-8 |
704 |
|
|
I99_03_05 |
|
TEFLUBENZURON |
83121-18-0 |
450 |
|
|
I99_03_06 |
|
TRIFLUMURON |
64628-44-0 |
548 |
|
|
I99_04 |
CARBAZATE INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_04_01 |
|
BIFENAZATE |
149877-41-8 |
736 |
|
|
I99_05 |
DIAZYLHYDRAZINE INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_05_01 |
|
METHOXYFENOZIDE |
161050-58-4 |
656 |
|
|
I99_05_02 |
|
TEBUFENOZIDE |
112410-23-8 |
724 |
|
|
I99_05_03 |
|
CHROMAFENOZIDE |
143807-66-3 |
775 |
|
|
I99_06 |
INSECT GROWTH REGULATORS |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_06_01 |
|
CYROMAZINE |
66215-27-8 |
420 |
|
|
I99_06_02 |
|
BUPROFEZIN |
69327-76-0 |
681 |
|
|
I99_06_03 |
|
HEXYTHIAZOX |
78587-05-0 |
439 |
|
|
I99_08 |
NITROGUANIDINE INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_08_01 |
|
CLOTHIANIDIN |
210880-92-5 |
738 |
|
|
I99_08_02 |
|
THIAMETHOXAM |
153719-23-4 |
637 |
|
|
I99_09 |
ORGANOTIN INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_10 |
OXADIAZINE INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_10_01 |
|
INDOXACARB |
173584-44-6 |
612 |
|
|
I99_11 |
PHENYL-ETHER INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_11_01 |
|
PYRIPROXYFEN |
95737-68-1 |
715 |
|
|
I99_12 |
PYRAZOLE (PHENYL-) INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_12_02 |
|
FIPRONIL |
120068-37-3 |
581 |
|
|
I99_12_03 |
|
TEBUFENPYRAD |
119168-77-3 |
725 |
|
|
I99_12_04 |
|
CHLORANTRANILIPROLE |
500008-45-7 |
794 |
|
|
I99_13 |
PYRIDINE INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_13_01 |
|
PYMETROZINE |
123312-89-0 |
593 |
|
|
I99_13_02 |
|
FLONICAMID |
158062-67-0 |
763 |
|
|
I99_13_03 |
|
SULFOXAFLOR |
946578-00-3 |
820 |
|
|
I99_14 |
PYRIDYLMETHYLAMINE INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_14_01 |
|
ACETAMIPRID |
135410-20-7 |
649 |
|
|
I99_14_02 |
|
IMIDACLOPRID |
138261-41-3 |
582 |
|
|
I99_14_03 |
|
THIACLOPRID |
111988-49-9 |
631 |
|
|
I99_14_04 |
|
FLUPYRADIFURONE |
951659-40-8 |
|
|
|
I99_15 |
SULFITE ESTER INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_17 |
TETRONIC ACID INSECTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_17_01 |
|
SPIRODICLOFEN |
148477-71-8 |
737 |
|
|
I99_17_02 |
|
SPIROMESIFEN |
283594-90-1 |
747 |
|
|
I99_18 |
INSECT ATTRACTANTS STRAIGHT CHAIN LEPIDOPTERAN PHEROMONES (SCLPS) |
|
|
895 |
|
|
I99_18_01 |
|
(E,E)-8,10-DODECADIEN-1-OL |
33956-49-9 |
860 |
|
|
I99_18_02 |
|
(Z)-9-DODECEN-1-YL ACETATE |
16974-11-1 112-66-3 |
422 |
|
|
I99_18_03 |
|
(Z)-8-DODECEN-1-YL ACETATE |
28079-04-1 |
861 |
|
|
I99_18_04 |
|
(2E, 13Z)-OCTADECADIEN-1-YL ACETATE |
86252-65-5 |
862 |
|
|
I99_18_05 |
|
(7E, 9E)-DODECADIEN 1-YL ACETATE |
54364-63-5 |
863 |
|
|
I99_18_06 |
|
(7E, 9Z)-DODECADIEN 1-YL ACETATE |
55774-32-8 |
864 |
|
|
I99_18_07 |
|
(7Z, 11E)-HEXADECADIEN-1-YL ACETATE |
51606-94-4 |
865 |
|
|
I99_18_08 |
|
(7Z, 11Z)-HEXADECADIEN-1-YL ACETATE |
53042-79-8 52207-99-5 |
866 |
|
|
I99_18_09 |
|
(9Z, 12E)-TETRADECADIEN-1-YL ACETATE |
31654-77-0 |
867 |
|
|
I99_18_10 |
|
(E)-11-TETRADECEN-1-YL ACETATE |
33189-72-9 |
868 |
|
|
I99_18_11 |
|
(E)-5-DECEN-1-OL |
56578-18-8 |
869 |
|
|
I99_18_12 |
|
(E)-5-DECEN-1-YL-ACETATE |
38421-90-8 |
870 |
|
|
I99_18_13 |
|
(E)-8-DODECEN-1-YL ACETATE |
38363-29-0 |
871 |
|
|
I99_18_14 |
|
(E/Z)-8-DODECEN-1-YL ACETATE |
38363-29-0 28079-04-1 |
872 |
|
|
I99_18_15 |
|
(Z)-11-HEXADECEN-1-OL |
56683-54-6 |
873 |
|
|
I99_18_16 |
|
(Z)-11-HEXADECEN-1-YL ACETATE |
34010-21-4 |
874 |
|
|
I99_18_17 |
|
(Z)-11-HEXADECENAL |
53939-28-9 |
875 |
|
|
I99_18_18 |
|
(Z)-11-TETRADECEN-1-YL ACETATE |
20711-10-8 |
876 |
|
|
I99_18_19 |
|
(Z)-13-OCTADECENAL |
58594-45-9 |
878 |
|
|
I99_18_20 |
|
(Z)-7-TETRADECENAL |
65128-96-3 |
879 |
|
|
I99_18_21 |
|
(Z)-8-DODECEN-1-OL |
40642-40-8 |
880 |
|
|
I99_18_22 |
|
(Z)-9-HEXADECENAL |
56219-04-6 |
881 |
|
|
I99_18_23 |
|
(Z)-9-TETRADECEN-1-YL ACETATE |
16725-53-4 |
882 |
|
|
I99_18_24 |
|
DODECYL ACETATE |
112-66-3 |
884 |
|
|
I99_18_25 |
|
TETRADECAN-1-OL |
112-72-1 |
856 |
|
|
I99_18_26 |
|
DODECAN-1-OL |
112-53-8 |
|
|
|
I99_18_27 |
|
(E/Z)-9-DODECEN-1-YL ACETATE |
16974-34-8 |
|
|
|
I99_18_28 |
|
(E,Z,Z)-3,8,11-TETRADECATRIEN-1-YL ACETATE |
|
|
|
|
I99_18_29 |
|
(E,Z)-3,8-TETRADECATRIEN-1-YL ACETATE |
|
|
|
|
I99_18_30 |
|
N-TETRADECYLACETATE |
|
|
|
|
I99_18_31 |
|
(Z,E)-9,11-TETRADECADIEN-1-YL ACETATE |
50767-79-8 |
|
|
|
I99_18_32 |
|
(E,Z)-3,13- OCTADECADIENYL ACETATE |
53120-26-6 |
|
|
|
I99_18_33 |
|
(Z,Z)-3,13- OCTADECADIENYL ACETATE |
53120-26-7 |
|
|
|
I99_19 |
OTHER INSECT ATTRACTANTS |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_19_01 |
|
AMMONIUM ACETATE |
631-61-8 |
842 |
|
|
I99_19_02 |
|
PUTRESCINE (1,4-DIAMINOBUTANE)) |
110-60-1 |
854 |
|
|
I99_19_03 |
|
TRIMETHYLAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE |
593-81-7 |
848 |
|
|
I99_19_04 |
|
(Z)-13-HEXADECEN-11YN-1-YL ACETATE |
78617-58-0 |
|
|
|
I99_19_05 |
|
(Z,Z,Z,Z)-7,13,16,19-DOCOSATETRAEN-1-YL ISOBUTYRATE |
135459-81-3 |
883 |
|
|
I99_19_06 |
|
RESCALURE |
67601-06-3 |
|
|
|
I99_19_07 |
|
HYDROLYSED PROTEINS |
|
901 |
|
Unclassified insecticides-acaricides |
I99_99 |
UNCLASSIFIED INSECTICIDES-ACARICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
I99_99_03 |
|
ETOXAZOLE |
153233-91-1 |
623 |
|
|
I99_99_04 |
|
FATTY ACIDS C7-C18 AND C18 UNSATURATED POTASSIUM SALTS (CAS 67701-09-1) |
67701-09-1 |
889 |
|
|
I99_99_05 |
|
FATTY ACIDS C8-C10 METHYL ESTERS (CAS 85566-26-3) |
85566-26-3 |
890 |
|
|
I99_99_06 |
|
FENAZAQUIN |
120928-09-8 |
693 |
|
|
I99_99_07 |
|
KIESELGUR (DIATOMACEOUS EARTH) |
61790-53-2 |
647 |
|
|
I99_99_08 |
|
LAURIC ACID (CAS 143-07-7) |
143-07-7 |
885 |
|
|
I99_99_09 |
|
METAFLUMIZONE |
139968-49-3 |
779 |
|
|
I99_99_10 |
|
METHYL DECANOATE (CAS 110-42-9) |
110-42-9 |
892 |
|
|
I99_99_11 |
|
METHYL OCTANOATE (CAS 111-11-5) |
111-11-5 |
893 |
|
|
I99_99_12 |
|
OLEIC ACID (CAS 112-80-1) |
112-80-1 |
894 |
|
|
I99_99_13 |
|
PARAFFIN OIL (CAS 64742-46-7) |
64742-46-7 |
896 |
|
|
I99_99_14 |
|
PARAFFIN OIL (CAS 72623-86-0) |
72623-86-0 |
897 |
|
|
I99_99_15 |
|
PARAFFIN OIL (CAS 8042-47-5) |
8042-47-5 |
898 |
|
|
I99_99_16 |
|
PARAFFIN OIL (CAS 97862-82-3) |
97862-82-3 |
899 |
|
|
I99_99_17 |
|
PHOSPHANE |
7803-51-2 |
127 |
|
|
I99_99_18 |
|
PYRIDABEN |
96489-71-3 |
583 |
|
|
I99_99_19 |
|
PYRIDALYL |
179101-81-6 |
792 |
|
|
I99_99_20 |
|
SPIROTETRAMAT |
203313-25-1 |
795 |
|
|
I99_99_21 |
|
SULFURYL FLUORIDE |
2699-79-8 |
757 |
|
|
I99_99_23 |
|
FATTY ACIDS C7 TO C20 |
|
891 |
|
|
I99_99_27 |
|
ALUMINIUM PHOSPHIDE |
20859-73-8 |
227 |
|
|
I99_99_28 |
|
MAGNESIUM PHOSPHIDE |
12057-74-8 |
228 |
|
|
I99_99_29 |
|
CARBON DIOXIDE |
124-38-9 |
844 |
|
|
I99_99_30 |
|
MALTODEXTRIN |
9050-36-6 |
801 |
|
|
I99_99_31 |
|
TERPENOID BLEND QRD 460 |
|
982 |
|
|
I99_99_32 |
|
FLUBENDIAMIDE |
272451-65-7 |
788 |
|
|
I99_99_99 |
|
OTHER INSECTICIDES-ACARICIDES |
|
|
Molluscicides |
|
PES_M |
|
|
|
|
|
Molluscicides |
M01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
M01_01 |
MOLLUSCICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
M01_01_01 |
|
FERRIC PHOSPHATE |
10045-86-0 |
629 |
|
|
M01_01_03 |
|
METALDEHYDE |
108-62-3 |
62 |
|
|
M01_01_99 |
|
OTHER MOLLUSCICIDES |
|
|
Plant Growth Regulators |
|
PES_PGR |
|
|
|
|
|
Physiological plant growth regulators |
PGR01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PGR01_01 |
PHYSIOLOGICAL PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS |
|
|
|
|
|
PGR01_01_01 |
|
1-METHYLCYCLOPROPENE |
3100-04-7 |
767 |
|
|
PGR01_01_02 |
|
CHLORMEQUAT |
999-81-5 |
143 |
|
|
PGR01_01_04 |
|
DAMINOZIDE |
1596-84-5 |
330 |
|
|
PGR01_01_05 |
|
ETHEPHON |
16672-87-0 |
373 |
|
|
PGR01_01_07 |
|
ETHYLENE |
74-85-1 |
839 |
|
|
PGR01_01_08 |
|
FORCHLORFENURON |
68157-60-8 |
633 |
|
|
PGR01_01_09 |
|
GIBBERELLIC ACID |
77-06-5 |
307 |
|
|
PGR01_01_10 |
|
GIBBERELLIN |
468-44-0 510-75-8 8030-53-3 |
904 |
|
|
PGR01_01_11 |
|
IMAZAQUIN |
81335-37-7 |
699 |
|
|
PGR01_01_12 |
|
MALEIC HYDRAZIDE |
123-33-1 |
310 |
|
|
PGR01_01_13 |
|
MEPIQUAT |
24307-26-4 |
440 |
|
|
PGR01_01_14 |
|
PACLOBUTRAZOL |
76738-62-0 |
445 |
|
|
PGR01_01_15 |
|
PROHEXADIONE-CALCIUM |
127277-53-6 |
567.02 |
|
|
PGR01_01_16 |
|
SODIUM 5-NITROGUAIACOLATE |
67233-85-6 |
718 |
|
|
PGR01_01_17 |
|
SODIUM O-NITROPHENOLATE |
824-39-5 |
720 |
|
|
PGR01_01_18 |
|
SODIUM P-NITROPHENOLATE |
824-78-2 |
721 |
|
|
PGR01_01_19 |
|
TRINEXAPAC-ETHYL |
95266-40-3 |
732.202 |
|
|
PGR01_01_22 |
|
FLUMETRALIN |
62924-70-3 |
971 |
|
|
PGR01_99 |
OTHER PHYSIOLOGICAL PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS |
|
|
|
|
|
PGR01_99_01 |
|
1-NAPHTHYLACETIC ACID (1-NAA) |
86-87-3 |
313 |
|
|
PGR01_99_02 |
|
1-DECANOL |
112-30-1 |
831 |
|
|
PGR01_99_03 |
|
1-NAPHTHYLACETAMIDE (1-NAD) |
86-86-2 |
282 |
|
|
PGR01_99_05 |
|
6-BENZYLADENINE |
1214-39-7 |
829 |
|
|
PGR01_99_07 |
|
INDOLYLBUTYRIC ACID |
133-32-4 |
830 |
|
|
PGR01_99_08 |
|
SINTOFEN (AKA CINTOFEN) |
130561-48-7 |
717 |
|
|
PGR01_99_09 |
|
1,4-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE |
|
822 |
|
|
PGR01_99_10 |
|
SODIUM SILVER THIOSULFATE |
|
762 |
|
|
PGR01_99_11 |
|
S-ABSCISIC ACID |
21293-29-8 |
|
|
|
PGR01_99_99 |
|
OTHER PHYSIOLOGICAL PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS |
|
|
|
Anti-sprouting products |
PGR02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PGR02_02 |
ANTISPROUTING PRODUCTS |
|
|
|
|
|
PGR02_02_01 |
|
CARVONE |
99-49-0 |
602 |
|
|
PGR02_99 |
OTHER ANTISPROUTING PRODUCTS |
|
|
|
|
|
PGR02_99_99 |
|
OTHER ANTISPROUTING PRODUCTS |
|
|
|
Other plant growth regulators |
PGR03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PGR03_99 |
OTHER PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS |
|
|
|
|
|
PGR03_99_01 |
|
SEA-ALGAE EXTRACT (FORMERLY SEA-ALGAE EXTRACT AND SEAWEEDS) |
|
920 |
|
|
PGR03_99_99 |
|
OTHER PGR |
|
|
Other Plant Protection Products |
|
PES_ZR |
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral oils |
ZR01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZR01_01 |
MINERAL OILS |
|
|
|
|
|
ZR01_01_01 |
|
MINERAL OILS |
|
|
|
Vegetal oils |
ZR02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZR02_01 |
VEGETAL OILS |
|
|
|
|
|
ZR02_01_01 |
|
PLANT OILS/CITRONELLA OIL |
|
905 |
|
|
ZR02_01_02 |
|
PLANT OILS/CLOVE OIL |
|
906 |
|
|
ZR02_01_03 |
|
PLANT OILS/RAPE SEED OIL |
|
907 |
|
|
ZR02_01_04 |
|
PLANT OILS/SPEARMINT OIL |
|
908 |
|
|
ZR02_01_99 |
|
OTHER VEGETAL OILS |
|
|
|
Soil sterilants (incl. Nematicides) |
ZR03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZR03_02 |
BIOLOGICAL NEMATICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
ZR03_02_01 |
|
PAECILOMYCES LILACINUS STRAIN 251 |
|
753 |
|
|
ZR03_02_02 |
|
BACILLUS FIRMUS I-1582 |
|
|
|
|
ZR03_02_99 |
OTHER BIOLOGICAL NEMATICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
ZR03_03 |
ORGANOPHOSPHOROUS NEMATICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
ZR03_03_01 |
|
FENAMIPHOS |
22224-92-6 |
692 |
|
|
ZR03_03_02 |
|
FOSTHIAZATE |
98886-44-3 |
585 |
|
|
ZR03_03_99 |
OTHER ORGANOPHOSPHOROUS NEMATICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
ZR03_99 |
OTHER SOIL STERILANTS |
|
|
|
|
|
ZR03_99_03 |
|
DAZOMET |
533-74-4 |
146 |
|
|
ZR03_99_04 |
|
METAM-SODIUM |
137-42-8 |
20 |
|
|
ZR03_99_99 |
|
OTHER SOIL STERILANTS |
|
|
|
Rodenticides |
ZR04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZR04_01 |
RODENTICIDES |
|
|
|
|
|
ZR04_01_01 |
|
CALCIUM PHOSPHIDE |
1305-99-3 |
505 |
|
|
ZR04_01_02 |
|
DIFENACOUM |
56073-07-5 |
514 |
|
|
ZR04_01_04 |
|
ZINC PHOSPIDE |
1314-84-7 |
69 |
|
|
ZR04_01_05 |
|
BROMADIOLONE |
28772-56-7 |
371 |
|
|
ZR04_01_99 |
|
OTHER RODENTICIDES |
|
|
|
All other plant protection products |
ZR99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZR99_01 |
DISINFECTANTS |
|
|
|
|
|
ZR99_01_99 |
|
OTHER DISINFECTANTS |
|
|
|
|
ZR99_02 |
REPELLENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
ZR99_02_01 |
|
ALUMINIUM AMMONIUM SULFATE |
7784-26-1 |
840 |
|
|
ZR99_02_02 |
|
ALUMINIUM SILICATE (AKA KAOLIN) |
1332-58-7 |
841 |
|
|
ZR99_02_03 |
|
BLOOD MEAL |
68911-49-9 |
909 |
|
|
ZR99_02_04 |
|
CALCIUM CARBIDE |
75-20-7 |
910 |
|
|
ZR99_02_05 |
|
CALCIUM CARBONATE |
471-34-1 |
843 |
|
|
ZR99_02_06 |
|
DENATHONIUM BENZOATE |
3734-33-6 |
845 |
|
|
ZR99_02_07 |
|
LIMESTONE |
1317-65-3 |
852 |
|
|
ZR99_02_08 |
|
METHYL NONYL KETONE |
112-12-9 |
846 |
|
|
ZR99_02_09 |
|
QUARTZ SAND |
14808-60-7 |
855 |
|
|
ZR99_02_10 |
|
REPELLENTS BY SMELL/TALL OIL CRUDE |
8002-26-4 |
911 |
|
|
ZR99_02_11 |
|
REPELLENTS BY SMELL/TALL OIL PITCH |
8016-81-7 |
912 |
|
|
ZR99_02_12 |
|
SODIUM ALUMINIUM SILICATE |
1344-00-9 |
850 |
|
|
ZR99_02_13 |
|
FAT DISTILATION RESIDUES |
|
915 |
|
|
ZR99_02_14 |
|
REPELLENTS BY SMELL/FISH OIL |
|
918 |
|
|
ZR99_02_15 |
|
REPELLENTS BY SMELL/SHEEP FAT |
|
919 |
|
|
ZR99_02_16 |
|
GARLIC EXTRACT |
|
916 |
|
|
ZR99_02_17 |
|
PEPPER |
|
917 |
|
|
ZR99_02_99 |
|
OTHER REPELLENTS |
|
|
|
|
ZR99_99 |
OTHER PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS |
|
|
|
|
|
ZR99_99_07 |
|
CAPRIC ACID |
334-48-5 |
886 |
|
|
ZR99_99_08 |
|
CAPRYLIC ACID |
124-07-2 |
887 |
|
|
ZR99_99_12 |
|
HEPTAMALOXYGLUCAN |
870721-81-6 |
851 |
|
|
ZR99_99_24 |
|
ZUCCHINI YELLOW MOSAIK VIRUS, WEAK STRAIN |
|
618 |
|
|
ZR99_99_34 |
|
PEPINO MOSAIC VIRUS, CH2 STRAIN, ISOLATE 1906 |
|
|
|
|
ZR99_99_99 |
|
OTHER PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS |
|
|
(1) Chemical Abstracts Service registry numbers.
(2) Collaborative International Pesticides Analytical Council.’
17.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 40/48 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/270
of 16 February 2017
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the conditions of approval of the active substance sulfuryl fluoride
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (1), and in particular the second alternative of Article 21(3) and Article 78(2) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Commission Directive 2010/38/EU (2) provides further confirmatory information on estimates of sulfuryl fluoride atmospheric lifetime, the tropospheric concentrations of sulfuryl fluoride and the milling conditions, necessary to ensure that residues of fluoride ion in cereals do not exceed the natural background levels. |
(2) |
Active substances included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC (3) are deemed to have been approved under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and are listed in Part A of the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (4). |
(3) |
The notifier submitted additional information with a view to confirm the risk assessment for the fate of sulfuryl fluoride in the atmosphere and for the residues of fluoride ion in milling products present in the machinery during the fumigation. |
(4) |
The United Kingdom assessed the additional information submitted by the notifier. It submitted its assessment, in the form of an addendum to the draft assessment report, to the other Member States, the Commission, and the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter ‘the Authority’, on 4 June 2015. |
(5) |
The Commission considered that according to the additional information provided by the notifier, it could not be excluded that the residue levels in milling products present in the machinery during the fumigation will exceed the natural background concentration for fluoride ion or will not meet the relevant maximum residue levels. Therefore the conditions of approval should be amended to ensure that milling products present in the treated facilities always comply with provisions of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council (5). Furthermore it considered that the information submitted has not demonstrated the steady state of sulfuryl fluoride in troposphere; consequently there is also a need for further monitoring of its tropospheric concentrations until the steady state is fully proven and to submit this information in this regard to the Commission, Member States and the European Food Safety Authority on regular basis, every fifth year. |
(6) |
Sulfuryl fluoride is also approved as a biocidal active substance according to Commission Directive 2009/84/EC (6). Due to the same concerns about the environmental fate of sulfuryl fluoride as for the pesticidal uses, additional information including a monitoring of the tropospheric concentrations has been required. Submission dates of information should be the same, in order to avoid redundant work and rationalize the evaluation process. |
(7) |
The Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
(8) |
The applicant was given the possibility to submit comments on the review report. |
(9) |
Member States should be provided with time to amend or withdraw authorisations for plant protection products containing sulfuryl fluoride which are not complying with the restricted conditions of approval. |
(10) |
For plant protection products containing sulfuryl fluoride, where Member States grant any grace period in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, this period should expire at the latest 18 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. |
(11) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Amendment to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011
The Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
Transitional measures
Member States shall in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, where necessary amend or withdraw existing authorisations for plant protection products containing sulfuryl fluoride as active substance by 9 September 2017.
Article 3
Grace period
Any grace period granted by Member States in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 shall be as short as possible and shall expire 12 months after restriction or withdrawal of the respective authorisation at the latest.
Article 4
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 February 2017.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude JUNCKER
(1) OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1.
(2) Commission Directive 2010/38/EU of 18 June 2010 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include sulfuryl fluoride as active substance (OJ L 154, 19.6.2010, p. 21).
(3) Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1).
(4) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 of 25 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of approved active substances (OJ L 153, 11.6.2011, p. 1).
(5) Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC (OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 1).
(6) Commission Directive 2009/84/EC of 28 July 2009 amending Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to include sulfuryl fluoride as an active substance in Annex I thereto (OJ L 197, 29.7.2009, p. 67).
ANNEX
The column ‘Specific provisions’ of row 307, sulfuryl fluoride, in Part A of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is replaced by the following:
‘PART A
Only uses as insecticide/nematicide (fumigant) applied by professional users in sealable structures may be authorised insofar:
(a) |
these structures are empty; or |
(b) |
where food or feed commodities are present in a fumigated facility, the users and the food business operators ensure that only the food or feed commodities compliant with the existing maximum residue levels for sulfuryl fluoride and fluoride ion set by Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*1) may enter the food and feed chain; to this purpose, the users and the food business operators shall fully implement measures equivalent to the HACCP principles as laid down in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*2); in particular, the users shall identify the critical control point at which control is essential to prevent maximum residue levels to be exceeded, and establish and implement effective monitoring procedures at that critical control point. |
PART B
For the implementation of the uniform principles, as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on sulfuryl fluoride, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed on 7 December 2016 shall be taken into account.
In this overall assessment, Member States must pay particular attention to:
— |
the risk posed by inorganic fluoride through contaminated products, such as flour and bran that remained in the mill machinery during fumigation, or grain stored in silos in the mill. Measures are required to ensure that only products complying with the existing MRLs enter the food and feed chain; |
— |
the risk to operators and the risk to workers, such as when re-entering a fumigated structure after aeration. Measures are required to ensure that they wear self-containing breathing apparatus or other appropriate personal protective equipment; |
— |
the risk to bystanders by applying an appropriate exclusion zone around the fumigated structure. |
Conditions of authorisation shall include risk mitigation measures, where appropriate.
The notifier shall submit to the Commission, Member States and the Authority monitoring data on tropospheric concentrations of sulfuryl fluoride every fifth year, starting from 30 June 2017. The limit of detection for the analysis shall be at least 0,5 ppt (equivalent to 2,1 ng sulfuryl fluoride/m3 of tropospheric air).
(*1) Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC (OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 1).
(*2) Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs (OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p. 1).’ ’
17.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 40/51 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/271
of 16 February 2017
extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of slightly modified certain aluminium foil
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1) (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,
Whereas:
1. PROCEDURE
1.1. Existing measures
(1) |
By Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 (2) (‘the original Regulation’), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 30,0 % on imports of aluminium foil of a thickness of not less than 0,008 mm and not more than 0,018 mm, not backed, not further worked than rolled, in rolls of a width not exceeding 650 mm and of a weight exceeding 10 kg (‘the product concerned’) from the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’ or ‘China’) for all other companies than the ones mentioned in Article 1(2) of that Regulation. |
(2) |
In December 2015, the measures on the same product were extended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2384 (3) (‘the expiry review’). |
(3) |
These measures will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the measures in force’ and the investigation that led to the measures imposed by the original Regulation will be hereinafter referred to as ‘the original investigation’. |
1.2. Initiation following a request
(4) |
On 18 April 2016, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) received a request indicating that the measures in force on imports of certain aluminium foil are being circumvented by imports of slightly modified products concerned from the PRC. |
(5) |
The applicant has requested anonymity on the grounds of a threat of commercial retaliation. The Commission considered the request substantiated and agreed to keep the applicant's identity confidential. |
(6) |
The request provided prima facie evidence that, following the imposition of the measures in force, a significant change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the PRC to the Union occurred, which seemed to have been caused by the imposition of the measures in force. There was allegedly insufficient due cause or justification other than the imposition of the measures in force for such a change. |
(7) |
Furthermore, the evidence on file pointed to the fact that the remedial effects of the measures in force were being undermined both in terms of quantity and price. The evidence showed that the increased imports of the slightly modified product were made at prices below the non-injurious price established in the original investigation. |
(8) |
Finally, there was prima facie evidence that the slightly modified products were dumped in relation to the normal value established for the like product, i.e. the product produced by the Union industry which has the same technical and physical characteristics as the product concerned, during the original investigation. |
(9) |
After having informed the Member States, the Commission determined that sufficient prima facie evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation. It thus initiated the present investigation by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/865 (4) (‘the initiating Regulation’). Pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission, by the initiating Regulation, also directed the customs authorities to register imports of slightly modified product concerned from the PRC. |
1.3. Investigation
(10) |
The Commission duly informed the authorities of the PRC, the exporting producers and traders in the PRC, the importers in the Union known to be concerned and the Union industry of the initiation of the investigation. |
(11) |
Exemption forms were sent to the exporting producers in the PRC and to the known importers in the Union. |
(12) |
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the initiating Regulation. All parties were informed that non-cooperation might lead to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and to findings being based on facts available. |
(13) |
Five groups of companies from the PRC and 19 companies from the Union, including the Union industry and unrelated importers, made themselves known. |
(14) |
Five groups of companies from the PRC and five unrelated importers submitted a questionnaire reply and requested an exemption from the possible extended measures in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation. |
(15) |
The following exporting producers submitted complete replies to the questionnaires and verification visits were subsequently carried out at their premises.
|
(16) |
The following five Union unrelated importers submitted complete replies to the questionnaires:
|
(17) |
One of the unrelated importers, the company Wrap Films Systems Ltd, subsequently ceased cooperation. |
(18) |
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following unrelated importers.
|
(19) |
The company Cellofix S.L. made submissions and requested a hearing as an interested party. |
(20) |
Hearings took place between the Commission and the applicant, and between the Commission and the following companies: Cellofix S.L., Now Plastics Inc. and Von Aschenbach & Voss GmbH. |
(21) |
Following the disclosure another hearing between the Commission and the applicant took place, after which the Commission redisclosed its intention to extend the measures under the mechanism of end-use procedure in accordance with Article 254 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (5) (‘the Union Customs Code’). |
1.4. Investigation period and reporting period
(22) |
The investigation period covered the period from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2016. Data was collected for the investigation period as well as for all years since 2009 (when the measures in force were imposed) to investigate, inter alia, the alleged change in the pattern of trade. For the period 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016 (‘the reporting period’) more detailed data were collected in order to examine the possible undermining of the remedial effect of the measures in force and existence of dumping. |
2. RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION
2.1. General considerations
(23) |
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission analysed successively whether there was a change in the pattern of trade between third countries and the Union; whether this change stemmed from a practice, process or work for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty; whether there was evidence of injury or that the remedial effects of the duty were being undermined in terms of the prices and/or quantities of the like product; and whether there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established for the like product, if necessary in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the basic Regulation. |
2.2. Product concerned
(24) |
The product concerned by the possible circumvention is the product subject to the measures in force, as described above in recital 1. It falls within CN code ex 7607 11 19 (TARIC code 7607111910). As established by the original investigation this particular type of aluminium foil is transformed into a consumer product, household aluminium foil (‘AHF’) used for packing and other household application. |
2.3. Product under investigation
(25) |
The product under investigation for circumvention has the same essential characteristics as the product concerned. However, it can be annealed or not. |
(26) |
The product under investigation was defined in the initiation Regulation as follows:
|
(27) |
The first three products described above currently fall within CN code ex 7607 11 19 (TARIC codes 7607111930, 7607111940 and 7607111950). The fourth product described above falls within CN code ex 7607 11 90 (TARIC codes 7607119045 and 7607119080). |
(28) |
In the original investigation the Commission had established that aluminium converter foil (‘ACF’) was not the product concerned (6). The two products — AHF and ACF — have different use. ACF is used by converter industries that laminate, coat, lacquer and otherwise process and integrate it into products that are used in fields such as packaging for food, medicine, cosmetics, and tobacco or in insulation materials for the construction sector. In December 2014 the Commission initiated an anti-dumping investigation on ACF (7). The request was withdrawn by the applicant and the measures on ACF were not imposed (8). For the above mentioned reasons the Commission found it appropriate to exclude ACF from the scope of this investigation. |
(29) |
After disclosure, the applicant argued that the ACF and AHF were interchangeable. The Commission considered however that this argument did not put into question the uncontested definition of the product concerned established in the original investigation. |
(30) |
In the investigation the Commission found however that the definition of the product under investigation comprised not only the slightly modified product concerned but could also include ACF. The five cooperating exporting producers exported ACF to the Union during the reporting period (see recital 74 below). It was thus decided to take account of the end use when designing the measures (see recitals 58 to 69). |
(31) |
Following the disclosure one of the non-cooperating importers claimed that the Commission should have taken into consideration its suggestion to exclude non-annealed jumbo reels from the scope of the investigation. |
(32) |
Since the company did not cooperate with the investigation, the Commission was not able to verify this claim. No facts available lead to the conclusion that non-annealed jumbo reels should be excluded from the scope of this investigation. Therefore the Commission rejected this claim |
2.4. Degree of cooperation
(33) |
There was a low level of cooperation by exporting producers in the PRC; only five groups of Chinese exporting producers came forward and requested an exemption from any possible extension of the measures in force representing around 22 % of the Chinese exports to the Union during the reporting period. |
(34) |
The exports of non-cooperating exporters were estimated at around 78 % of the total Chinese exports to the Union during the same period. Hence, for those exports the Commission used best facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation. |
2.5. Change in the pattern of trade
(35) |
In order to establish the change in the pattern of trade the Commission analysed the volume of imports of the product concerned and the volume of imports of the slightly modified product concerned for the period between the imposition of the original measures (2009) until September 2016. |
(36) |
The investigation found that 80 % of the total volume of imports of the product under investigation originating in the PRC was the slightly modified product concerned for the reporting period (9). This ratio was then extrapolated for the years concerned since 2009. |
(37) |
The volume of imports of the product concerned was established on the basis of Eurostat for the period between 2009 and reporting period. |
(38) |
The table below compiles the information collected. Table 1 Imports product concerned and slightly modified product concerned from the PRC into the EU
|
(39) |
The total volume of imports of the product concerned from the PRC fell from 30 318 tonnes during IP of the original investigation (July 2007 to June 2008) to 1 152 tonnes during the reporting period of this investigation. In contrast, imports of the slightly modified product concerned increased from 11 393 tonnes in 2009 to 44 522 tonnes during the reporting period of this investigation. |
(40) |
The increase of imports of the slightly modified product concerned as well as the parallel disappearance of imports of the product concerned since imposition of measures, constitute a significant change in the pattern of trade, as required by Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation. |
(41) |
After disclosure one of the non-cooperating importers claimed that the Commission used an erroneous methodology to determine the change in the pattern of trade. More specifically, it questioned the assumption that sales of non-cooperating exporting producers during the reporting period were sales of the slightly modified product. |
(42) |
The Commission reiterated that it based itself on the facts available when establishing the volume of imports of the slightly modified product. Given the very low level of cooperation, in light of the information contained in the request and in absence of any other information to the contrary, the Commission could reasonably conclude that the non-cooperating companies were exporting the slightly modified product. Therefore the methodology used to establish the change in the pattern of trade was confirmed. |
2.6. Existence of circumvention practices
(43) |
Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation requires that the change in the pattern of trade stems from a practice, process or work for which there is insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty. The practice, process or work includes, inter alia, the slight modification of the product concerned. |
(44) |
The activities of the cooperating exporting producers were analysed. This analysis confirmed the existence of the four circumvention practices. |
(45) |
For the four circumvention practices, evidence took form of emails from the Chinese exporting producers advising customers on how the current measures could be circumvented. The different pieces of evidence also contained information that such practices have been actually put in place by some of the Union importers/users. |
(46) |
The Commission also found supporting evidence when verifying one of the cooperating Chinese producers, namely Dingsheng Aluminium Group. In the period since the imposition of the duties in 2009, Dingsheng Aluminium Group exported to the Union AHF thinner than the product concerned, i.e. AHF having the thickness less than 0,008 mm and not less than 0,007 mm. The same exporting producer also exported to the Union AHF thicker than the product concerned, i.e. AHF more than 0,018 mm and less than 0,021 mm. Evidence in form of emails from other exporting producers also confirmed that such a practice exists. |
(47) |
Furthermore, in the same period, Dingsheng Aluminium Group sold to the Union AHF in rolls wider that 650 mm. These rolls were subsequently slit in the Union into smaller rolls. When verifying one of the cooperating importers, the Commission found that this importer, namely the company Von Aschenbach & Voss GmbH, slits in the Union wider rolls into consumer rolls. |
(48) |
Concerning the imports into the Union of the aluminium foil of a thickness between 0,021 mm and 0,045 mm and presented in double layers, the Commission had evidence in the file in the form of emails exchanged between Chinese exporting producers, including from Dingsheng Aluminium Group, and the Union producers. The Commission also established that some of the Union producers own machines used to de-double the foil to standard thicknesses allowing its use as AHF. |
(49) |
On the basis of the findings with regard to the cooperating exporting producers and on the basis of the facts available for the non-cooperating exporting producers, the existence of a circumvention practice within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation is established at a country level for 80 % all imports of the product under investigation from the PRC. This circumvention practice takes the form of a slight modification of the product concerned to make it fall under customs codes which are normally not subject to the measures, namely the product under investigation. |
2.7. Undermining the remedial effects of the duty in terms of the prices and/or the quantities of the like product
(50) |
The increase of imports of the slightly modified product concerned was significant as explained in recital 36 above and represented around 80 % of the total volume of imports of the product under investigation for the period between 2009 and the reporting period. |
(51) |
The Commission compared the export price of the slightly modified product concerned with the injury elimination level as established in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2384 imposing a definitive duty following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation. |
(52) |
As regards the cooperating exporting producer engaging in circumvention practices, the export price was determined on the basis of the information verified during the investigation. For the non-cooperating exporting producers, the export price was established on the basis of Eurostat data, after deduction of the volume of exports made by the cooperating exporting producers. |
(53) |
This comparison showed significant price underselling. |
(54) |
It is therefore considered that the remedial effects of the measures in force are being undermined both in terms of quantities and prices. |
2.8. Evidence of dumping in relation to the normal value previously established for the like product
(55) |
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation and to establish whether export prices of the product under investigation were dumped, export prices of both the cooperating exporting producer engaging in circumvention practices and of non-cooperating exporting producers were determined as described in recitals 51 and 52 above and compared to the normal value established during the expiry review investigation mentioned in recital 51 and duly adjusted to London Metal Exchange (LME) fluctuations. This adjustment was necessary due to the fact that prices of aluminium products refer to price fluctuations of the basic raw material, primary aluminium. LME prices are considered as the global benchmark for primary aluminium. |
(56) |
The comparison of normal value and export price shows that AHF is imported at dumped prices to the Union during the reporting period by both the cooperating exporting producer engaging in circumvention practices and the non-cooperating exporting producers. |
2.9. Conclusion
(57) |
Based on the findings above the Commission concluded that duties on imports of the product concerned as defined in the original investigation were circumvented by imports of slightly modified product concerned originating in the PRC. |
(58) |
The investigation also showed that there was a change in the pattern of trade between the PRC and the Union, and that there was insufficient due cause or economic justification for this change other than the imposition of the duty. |
(59) |
The Commission also found that these imports cause injury and that the remedial effects of the duty are being undermined in terms of the prices and/or quantities of the like product. Evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established for the like product was also found. |
3. MEASURES
(60) |
In view of the findings above, the Commission concluded that the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC is circumvented by imports of the product under investigation originating in the PRC. |
(61) |
However, based on the above mentioned findings, it was concluded that aluminium converter foil must be excluded from the scope of the extended measures. |
(62) |
In order to establish how a distinction can be made between AHF and ACF, the Commission first relied on extra criteria, additional to the thickness of the aluminium foil and the width of the rolls. |
(63) |
The Commission considered that a cumulative analysis of a set of characteristics can lead to the desired distinction: alloys, wettability and pinholes of the aluminium foil. |
(64) |
Aluminium alloy is determined by the chemical composition of the product (content of actual aluminium and other chemicals). Based on submissions from interested parties and on information collected during verification visits, the investigation found that ACF is generally produced using aluminium alloys 1235, 8011 and 8079. |
(65) |
Wettability grade is defined as the degree of dryness (surface cleanliness) of the aluminium foil from the oil that is used during the rolling process. Wettability for ACF is generally of degree A, as any residue of oil in the surface would entail problems in printing and lamination. |
(66) |
Pinholes appear in the texture of the aluminium foil during the process of rolling down. The number of pinholes in sales of AHF is generally not important and not a part of product specifications. The number of pinholes is important for ACF products because during the lamination process adhesive can penetrate from one side of the foil layer to the other side via the pinholes and thus damage the packaging material. The Commission found that the maximum number of pinholes in ACF generally relates to the thickness of the foil. The maximum number of pinholes per m2 in relation to the thickness of the foil is as follows. Table 2 Maximum number of pinholes per m2 in relation to the thickness of the foil
|
(67) |
These criteria were based on findings of the investigation and submissions by third parties. |
(68) |
The applicant maintained and reiterated after disclosure that no workable dividing line could be drawn based on the above criteria and hence this would have created a disproportionate risk of circumvention. It argued that aluminium foils were interchangeable and that some AHF might be produced using the same aluminium foils as it was generally used to produce ACF. In particular it pointed to the alloys 8011 and 8079. Regarding the number of pinholes the applicant submitted that these were not a regulated requirement and generally based on an agreement between seller and buyer. Regarding the wettability criterion the applicant also argued that it was not a decisive factor to determine whether an aluminium foil was ACF. During the hearing after disclosure it also argued that even the cumulative application of the three criteria was not workable to establish the desired distinction. Even if all the three criteria for ACF were fulfilled, imports could still be used as household foil and distort competition. In the applicant's opinion the only way to differentiate between AHF and ACF was by its end-use. Following the additional disclosure the applicant submitted that the exporting producers exempted in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation should be subject to end-use procedure in accordance with Article 254 of the Union Customs Code in order to prevent any future circumvention of the measures. |
(69) |
One of the cooperating exporting producers also argued that the criteria proposed by the Commission to distinguish ACF from AHF were not commonly and widely accepted by the aluminium industry. It argued that this would open the door for circumvention of the extended anti-dumping duties and lead to a significant decrease in the average price of ACF, which could lead to another anti-dumping complaint. |
(70) |
After the additional disclosure an importer maintained its view that a distinction was indeed possible and sufficient based on an additional cumulative analysis of the three characteristics alloys, wettability and pinholes. |
(71) |
In response to these arguments, the Commission first recalled that anti-circumvention measures may not legally be imposed on the basis of the mere risk of circumvention, but only if the conditions set by Article 13 of the Basic Regulation were met. Therefore the applicant's request to make the exempted exporting producers subject to end-use control was rejected. |
(72) |
Following the initial and additional disclosure the Commission further assessed its initial approach detailed in recitals 62 and 66 above and the arguments submitted by the importer stated in recital 70. The Commission maintained its conclusion that due to their similar characteristics it cannot be excluded that ACF meeting the technical requirements stated in recitals 61 and 67 would in fact be actually used for household applications. Therefore it concluded that, given the specific circumstances of the case, the most appropriate way to differentiate between the two products for the purpose of extending the original measure is by their end-use. Accordingly, the importers which do not use the imported aluminium foil for household applications will have the possibility to make a declaration subject to end-use procedure in accordance with Article 254 of the Union Customs Code. |
4. REQUESTS FOR EXEMPTION
4.1. Request for exemption by groups of exporting producers
(73) |
In accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation five cooperating groups of exporting producers from the PRC requested to be exempted from the possible extended measures and submitted an exemption request. |
(74) |
The investigation found that four groups of Chinese exporting producers were exporting only ACF to the Union and not the slightly modified aluminium household foil. Therefore, these groups of Chinese exporting producers were found not to circumvent the current duties. The Commission thus considered that these companies could be granted an exemption from the extended duties under Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation. |
(75) |
The investigation also revealed that one cooperating producer, the Dingsheng Aluminium Group, was involved in all types of circumvention practices, except for one, namely it did not export to the Union aluminium foil of a thickness of not less than 0,021 mm and not more than 0,045 mm, when presented with at least two layers, regardless of the width of the rolls. |
(76) |
The conclusion that this company was involved in three circumvention practices was reached on the basis of several factors. First, the Commission identified the slightly modified products that it exported to the Union based on the information provided by the company with regards to its sales of AHF and ACF to its customers. Second, a sample of invoices related to the AHF and ACF customers was verified. This exercise confirmed that the products sold to customers indicated as AHF were indeed either the product concerned or the slight modified AHF. As a result, the Commission found that the circumvented slightly modified AHF constituted 20 % of all exports of the product under investigation, while the rest was genuine ACF for this company. Third, a clear change in pattern of trade was found for this company whereby the exports of the product concerned had been replaced by the slightly modified product. Fourth, no economic justification other than the imposition of the measures for this change in pattern of trade was found. Fifth, both dumping and undermining the remedial effect of the duties were found with respect to the slightly modified products exported by this exporting producer. |
(77) |
In light of the above, under Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation, an exemption to the Dingsheng Aluminium Group could not be granted. |
(78) |
Following the disclosure the applicant claimed that no exemption from the scope of extended measures should be granted to Chinese exporting producers. |
(79) |
It argued that the Commission could not have verified that the exempted Chinese exporting producers actually exported ACF, as this was not mentioned in the questionnaires. Moreover, it stated that the circumvention practice would take place in the Union. Under these circumstances exemption could not be granted to exporters as a matter of law. |
(80) |
The Commission visited the exporting producers on the spot and verified, inter alia, the technical characteristics and end uses of the product under investigation sold to the Union. Hence, it concluded from the verification visits that the product exported by the four exporting producers was effectively ACF, that is, a product not covered by this investigation. The Commission also observed that the slight modification of the product took place in China, namely at the premises of one of the cooperating producers and — based on the facts available — at the premises of non-cooperating producers. Hence it was possible and indeed necessary to grant an exemption to those who have not engaged in any form of circumvention practices in China and meet the conditions of Article 13(4) of the Basic Regulation. Consequently the claim was rejected. |
4.2. Request for exemption by unrelated importers
(81) |
When the circumvention practice takes place within the Union, Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation allows importers to be exempted from the extended duties, if they can show that they are not related to producers subject to measures. |
(82) |
On these grounds, five exemption requests by unrelated importers were received and examined. One of the companies, Wrap Films Systems Ltd, subsequently ceased cooperation. |
(83) |
The Commission found that, although in some cases the final completion (slitting of the foil into smaller rolls) takes place in the Union, the slight modification of the product concerned as such takes place outside the Union, namely in the PRC. On these grounds the Commission considered that exemptions might not be granted to the unrelated importers. |
(84) |
For three of the four cooperating companies it was found that they were genuine importers reselling the product under investigation without processing it. Therefore these companies cannot be exempted from the extended duties under Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation. Only one of the companies, the company Von Aschenbach &Voss GmbH, imports from the PRC the product under investigation in the form of aluminium household foil in rolls exceeding 650 mm and further processes it. The foil is slit before it is sold to the company's customers (rewinders). |
(85) |
Before imposition of the existing measures, the company Von Aschenbach & Voss imported into the Union the product concerned, and a clear change of pattern was found. The Commission's findings do not support the company's view on an existence of a due cause or economic justification, other than imposition of the duties. Therefore even if the Commission were to accept that this justified that the circumvention practice was completed within the Union, an exemption to this company could not be granted. |
(86) |
Therefore, it was concluded that none of the unrelated importers may be exempted under Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation. |
4.3. Conclusion
(87) |
Based on the above mentioned findings it was concluded that the four of the five cooperating groups of the Chinese exporting producers could be exempted from the extended duties. It was also found that one of the Chinese exporting producers, the Dingsheng Aluminium Group, cannot be exempted. |
(88) |
It was also concluded that none of the unrelated importers may be exempted under Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation. |
5. CONCLUSION
(89) |
In accordance with the first sentence of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the existing anti-dumping measures on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC should be extended to imports of the product under investigation originating in the PRC. |
(90) |
Pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, which provide that any extended measures should apply to imports which entered the Union under registration imposed by the initiating Regulation, the anti-dumping duty should be collected on those imports into the Union of
originating in the PRC. |
(91) |
The product described in recital 90 should be exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty if it is imported for other uses than the use of household foil. Such an exemption should be subject to the conditions laid down in the relevant customs provisions of the Union on the end-use procedure, in particular Article 254 of the Union Customs Code. |
6. DISCLOSURE
(92) |
All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations leading to the above conclusions and were invited to comment. Such comments were addressed in this Regulation. |
(93) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
1. The definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to ‘all other companies’ imposed by Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in the People's Republic of China is hereby extended to imports into the Union of:
— |
aluminium foil of a thickness of not less than 0,007 mm and less than 0,008 mm, regardless of the width of the rolls, whether or not annealed, currently falling within CN code ex 7607 11 19 (TARIC code 7607111930) or |
— |
aluminium foil of a thickness of not less than 0,008 mm and not more than 0,018 mm and in rolls of a width exceeding 650 mm, whether or not annealed, currently falling within CN code ex 7607 11 19 (TARIC code 7607111940), or |
— |
aluminium foil of a thickness of more than 0,018 mm and less than 0,021 mm, regardless of the width of the rolls, whether or not annealed, currently falling within CN code ex 7607 11 19 (TARIC code 7607111950), or |
— |
aluminium foil of a thickness of not less than 0,021 mm and not more than 0,045 mm, when presented with at least two layers, regardless of the width of the rolls, whether or not annealed, currently falling within CN code ex 7607 11 90 (TARIC codes 7607119045 and 7607119080). |
2. This extension does not apply to imports referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article produced by the companies listed below:
Company name |
TARIC additional code |
Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd |
C198 |
Luoyang Wanji Aluminium Processing Co., Ltd |
C199 |
Xiamen Xiashun Aluminium Foil Co., Ltd |
C200 |
Yantai Donghai Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd |
C201 |
3. The application of exemptions granted to the companies specifically mentioned in paragraph 2 of this Article shall be conditional upon presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice issued by the producer on which shall appear a declaration dated and signed by an official of the entity issuing such invoice, identified by his/her name and function. This declaration shall be drafted as follows: ‘I, the undersigned, certify that the (volume) of certain aluminium foil sold for export to the European Union covered by this invoice was manufactured by (company name and address) (TARIC additional code) in (country concerned). I declare that the information provided in this invoice is complete and correct.’ If no such invoice is presented, the anti-dumping duty as imposed by paragraph 1 of this Article shall apply.
4. The product described in paragraph 1 shall be exempted from definitive anti-dumping duty if it is imported for other uses than the use of household foil. An exemption shall be subject to the conditions laid down in the relevant customs provisions of the Union on the end-use procedure, in particular Article 254 of the Union Customs Code.
5. The duty extended by paragraph 1 on this Article shall be collected on imports originating in the People's Republic of China, registered in accordance with Article 2 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/865 and with Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, with the exception of those produced by the companies listed in paragraph 2 of this Article and with the exemption of those which can demonstrate that they were used for other uses than household foil in accordance with paragraph 4.
6. Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.
Article 2
1. Requests for exemption from the duty extended by Article 1 shall be made in writing in one of the official languages of the European Union and must be signed by a person authorised to represent the entity requesting the exemption. The request must be sent to the following address:
European Commission |
Directorate-General for Trade |
Directorate H |
Office: CHAR 04/039 |
1049 Brussels |
Belgium |
2. In accordance with Article 13(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, the Commission may authorise, by decision, the exemption of imports from companies which do not circumvent the anti-dumping measures imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2384, from the duty extended by Article 1 of this Regulation.
Article 3
Customs authorities are hereby directed to discontinue the registration of imports, established in accordance with Article 2 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/865.
Article 4
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 February 2017.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude JUNCKER
(1) OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
(2) Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 of 24 September 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in Armenia, Brazil and the People's Republic of China (OJ L 262, 6.10.2009, p. 1).
(3) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2384 of 17 December 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium foils originating in the People's Republic of China and terminating the proceeding for imports of certain aluminium foils originating in Brazil following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 332, 18.12.2015, p. 63).
(4) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/865 of 31 May 2016 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2384 on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in the People's Republic of China by imports of slightly modified certain aluminium foil from the People's Republic of China, and making such imports subject to registration (OJ L 144, 1.6.2016, p. 35).
(5) Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1).
(6) Recital 89 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 287/2009 of 7 April 2009 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in Armenia, Brazil and the People's Republic of China (OJ L 94, 8.4.2009, p. 17).
(7) OJ C 444, 12.12.2014, p. 13.
(8) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1928 of 23 October 2015 terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain aluminium foil originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 281, 27.10.2015, p. 16).
(9) In order to establish the volume of the slightly modified product concerned within the product under investigation for the reporting period the Commission used the following methodology. Firstly, the Commission established the total volume of exports of the product under investigation from China on the basis of Eurostat. Secondly, from the verified questionnaire replies of the cooperating Chinese exporting producers, the Commission established the volume of the exports of ACF of the five cooperating companies. Thirdly, the Commission deducted the volume of exports of ACF made by the cooperating companies from the total exports from China. Given the very high level of non-cooperation, the Commission considered that it has a sufficient basis to assume that the non-cooperating companies are exporting the slightly modified product. On this basis, the Commission concluded that 80 % of the total exports from China are made of the exports of the slightly modified products and the 20 % are the exports of ACF. The Commission applied this ratio to establish the change of the pattern of trade.
17.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 40/64 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/272
of 16 February 2017
initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1331/2011 on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in the People's Republic of China by imports consigned from India, whether declared as originating in India or not, and making such imports subject to registration
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1) and in particular Articles 13(3) and 14(5) thereof,
After having informed the Member States,
Whereas:
A. REQUEST
(1) |
The European Commission (‘the Commission’) has received a request pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 (‘the basic Regulation’) to investigate the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in the People's Republic of China by imports consigned from India, whether declared as originating in India or not, and to make such imports subject to registration. |
(2) |
The request was lodged on 3 January 2017 by the Defence Committee of the Seamless Stainless Steel Tubes Industry of the European Union (‘the applicant’). |
B. PRODUCT
(3) |
The product concerned by the possible circumvention is certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel (‘SSSPT’) (excluding such pipes and tubes with attached fittings suitable for conducting gases or liquids for use in civil aircraft). It is currently falling within CN codes 7304 11 00, 7304 22 00, 7304 24 00, ex 7304 41 00, 7304 49 10, ex 7304 49 93, ex 7304 49 95, ex 7304 49 99 and ex 7304 90 00, originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the product concerned’). This is the product to which the measures that are currently in force apply. |
(4) |
The product under investigation is the same as that defined in the previous recital, but consigned from India, whether declared as originating in India or not, currently falling within the same CN codes as the product concerned (‘the product under investigation’). |
C. EXISTING MEASURES
(5) |
The measures currently in force and possibly being circumvented are anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1331/2011 (2) (‘the existing measures’). |
D. GROUNDS
(6) |
The request contains sufficient prima facie evidence that the anti-dumping measures imposed on the product concerned are being circumvented by imports of the product under investigation consigned from India. |
(7) |
The evidence submitted is as follows: |
(8) |
The request shows that a significant change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the People's Republic of China and India to the Union has taken place following the imposition of the measures, without sufficient due cause or economic justification for such a change other than the imposition of the duty. |
(9) |
This change appears to stem from the consignment of the product concerned via India to the Union, either after having undertaken completion operations or not. The applicant has provided sufficient prima facie evidence showing that the value added during the completion operation is lower than 25 % of the manufacturing cost. |
(10) |
Furthermore, the request contains sufficient prima facie evidence that the remedial effects of the existing anti-dumping measures on the product concerned are being undermined both in terms of quantity and price. Significant volumes of imports of the product under investigation appear to have replaced imports of the product concerned. In addition, there is sufficient prima facie evidence that imports of the product under investigation are made at prices below the non-injurious price established in the investigation that led to the existing measures. |
(11) |
Finally, the request contains sufficient prima facie evidence that the prices of the product under investigation are dumped in relation to the normal value previously established for the product concerned. |
(12) |
Should circumvention practices via India covered by Article 13 of the basic Regulation, other than transhipment and assembly operations be identified in the course of the investigation, the investigation may also cover these practices. |
E. PROCEDURE
(13) |
In light of the above, the Commission has concluded that sufficient evidence exists to justify the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 13(3) of the basic Regulation and to make imports of the products under investigation subject to registration, in accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation. |
(a) Questionnaires
(14) |
In order to obtain information it deems necessary for its investigation, the Commission will send questionnaires to the known exporters/producers in India and to the known associations of exporters/producers in the PRC, to the known importers and to the known associations of importers in the Union and to the authorities of India and the PRC. Information, as appropriate, may also be sought from the Union industry. |
(15) |
In any event, all interested parties should contact the Commission, but not later than the time-limit set in Article 3 of this Regulation, and request a questionnaire within the time-limit set in Article 3(1) of this Regulation, given that the time-limit set in Article 3(2) of this Regulation applies to all interested parties. |
(16) |
The authorities of India and the PRC will be notified of the initiation of the investigation. |
(b) Collection of information and holding of hearings
(17) |
All interested parties are invited to make their views known in writing and to provide supporting evidence. Furthermore, the Commission may hear interested parties, provided that they make a request in writing and show that there are particular reasons why they should be heard. |
(c) Exemption from registration of imports or measures
(18) |
In accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation, imports of the products under investigation may be exempted from registration or measures if the importation does not constitute circumvention. |
(19) |
Since the possible circumvention may take place outside the Union, exemptions may be granted, in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation, to producers of the products under investigation in India that can show that they are not related (3) to any producer subject to the measures (4) and that are found not to be engaged in circumvention practices as defined in Article 13(1) and (2) of the basic Regulation. Producers wishing to obtain an exemption should submit a request duly supported by evidence within the time-limit indicated in Article 3(3) of this Regulation. |
F. REGISTRATION
(20) |
Pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, imports of the products under investigation shall be made subject to registration in order to ensure that, should the investigation result in findings of circumvention, anti-dumping duties of an appropriate amount can be levied from the date on which registration of such imports was imposed. |
G. TIME-LIMITS
(21) |
In the interest of sound administration, time-limits should be stated within which:
|
(22) |
Attention is drawn to the fact that the exercise of most procedural rights set out in the basic Regulation depends on the party's making itself known within the time-limits laid down in Article 3 of this Regulation. |
H. NON-COOPERATION
(23) |
In cases in which any interested party refuses access to or does not provide the necessary information within the time-limits, or significantly impedes the investigation, findings, affirmative or negative, may be made in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, on the basis of the facts available. |
(24) |
Where it is found that any interested party has supplied false or misleading information, the information shall be disregarded and use may be made of facts available. |
(25) |
If an interested party does not cooperate or cooperates only partially and findings are therefore based on the facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, the result may be less favourable to that party than if it had cooperated. |
(26) |
Failure to give a computerised response shall not be deemed to constitute non-cooperation, provided that the interested party shows that presenting the response as requested would result in an unreasonable extra burden or unreasonable additional cost. The interested party should immediately contact the Commission. |
I. SCHEDULE OF THE INVESTIGATION
(27) |
The investigation will be concluded, pursuant to Article 13(3) of the basic Regulation, within nine months of the date the date of entry into force of this Regulation. |
J. PROCESSING OF PERSONAL DATA
(28) |
It is noted that any personal data collected in this investigation will be treated in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (5). |
K. HEARING OFFICER
(29) |
Interested parties may request the intervention of the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings. The Hearing Officer acts as an interface between the interested parties and the Commission investigation services. The Hearing Officer reviews requests for access to the file, disputes regarding the confidentiality of documents, requests for extension of time-limits and requests by third parties to be heard. The Hearing Officer may organise a hearing with an individual interested party and mediate to ensure that the interested parties' rights of defence are being fully exercised. |
(30) |
A request for a hearing with the Hearing Officer should be made in writing and should specify the reasons for the request. The Hearing Officer will also provide opportunities for a hearing involving parties to take place which would allow different views to be presented and rebuttal arguments offered. |
(31) |
For further information and contact details interested parties may consult the Hearing Officer's web pages on the Directorate-General for Trade's website: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/trade-policy-and-you/contacts/hearing-officer/, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
An investigation is initiated pursuant to Article 13(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, in order to determine if imports into the Union of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel currently falling within CN codes ex 7304 11 00, ex 7304 22 00, ex 7304 24 00, ex 7304 41 00, ex 7304 49 10, ex 7304 49 93, ex 7304 49 95, ex 7304 49 99 and ex 7304 90 00 consigned from India (TARIC codes: 7304110011, 7304110019, 7304220021, 7304220029, 7304240021, 7304240029, 7304410091, 7304491091, 7304499391, 7304499591, 7304499991 and 7304900091), whether declared as originating in India or not, are circumventing the measures imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1331/2011.
Article 2
The Customs authorities shall, pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, take the appropriate steps to register the imports into the Union identified in Article 1 of this Regulation.
Registration shall expire nine months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
The Commission, by regulation, may direct Customs authorities to cease registration in respect of imports into the Union of products manufactured by producers having applied for an exemption from registration and having been found to fulfil the conditions for an exemption to be granted.
Article 3
1. Questionnaires must be requested from the Commission within 15 days from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
2. Interested parties, if their representations are to be taken into account during the investigation, must make themselves known by contacting the Commission, present their views in writing and submit questionnaire replies or any other information within 37 days from the date of entry into force of this Regulation, unless otherwise specified.
3. Producers in India requesting exemption from registration of imports or measures must submit a request duly supported by evidence within the same 37-day time-limit.
4. Interested parties may also apply to be heard by the Commission within the same 37-day time-limit.
5. Information submitted to the Commission for the purpose of trade defence investigations shall be free from copyrights. Interested parties, before submitting to the Commission information and/or data which is subject to third party copyrights, must request specific permission to the copyright holder explicitly allowing a) the Commission to use the information and data for the purpose of this trade defence proceeding and b) to provide the information and/or data to interested parties to this investigation in a form that allows them to exercise their right of defence.
6. All written submissions, including the information requested in this Regulation, completed questionnaires and correspondence provided by interested parties for which confidential treatment is requested shall be labelled ‘Limited’ (6).
7. Interested parties providing ‘Limited’ information are required to furnish non- confidential summaries of it pursuant to Article 19(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, which will be labelled ‘For inspection by interested parties’. These summaries should be sufficiently detailed to permit a reasonable understanding of the substance of the information submitted in confidence. If an interested party providing confidential information does not furnish a non-confidential summary of it in the requested format and quality, such information may be disregarded.
8. Interested parties are invited to make all submissions and requests by email including scanned powers of attorney and certification sheets, with the exception of voluminous replies which shall be submitted on a CD-ROM or DVD by hand or by registered mail. By using email, interested parties express their agreement with the rules applicable to electronic submissions contained in the document ‘CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IN TRADE DEFENCE CASES’ published on the website of the Directorate-General for Trade: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/june/tradoc_148003.pdf
The interested parties must indicate their name, address, telephone and a valid email address and they should ensure that the provided email address is a functioning official business email which is checked on a daily basis. Once contact details are provided, the Commission will communicate with interested parties by email only, unless they explicitly request to receive all documents from the Commission by another means of communication or unless the nature of the document to be sent requires the use of a registered mail. For further rules and information concerning correspondence with the Commission including principles that apply to submissions by email, interested parties should consult the communication instructions with interested parties referred to above.
Commission address for correspondence:
European Commission |
Directorate-General for Trade |
Directorate H |
Office: CHAR 04/039 |
1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
Email: TRADE-R670-SSSPT-CIRC@ec.europa.eu |
Article 4
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 February 2017.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude JUNCKER
(1) OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
(2) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1331/2011 of 14 December 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 336, 20.12.2011, p. 6).
(3) In accordance with Article 127 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 343, 29.12.2015, p. 558), two persons shall be deemed to be related if: (a) they are officers or directors of the other person's business; (b) they are legally recognised partners in business; (c) they are employer and employee; (d) a third party directly or indirectly owns, controls or holds 5 % or more of the outstanding voting stock or shares of both of them; (e) one of them directly or indirectly controls the other; (f) both of them are directly or indirectly controlled by a third person; (g) together they control a third person directly or indirectly; or (h) they are members of the same family. Persons shall be deemed to be members of the same family only if they stand in any of the following relationships to one another: (i) husband and wife, (ii) parent and child, (iii) brother and sister (whether by whole or half blood), (iv) grandparent and grandchild, (v) uncle or aunt and nephew or niece, (vi) parent-in-law and son-in-law or daughter-in-law, (vii) brother-in-law and sister-in-law. In this context ‘person’ means any natural or legal person.
(4) However, even if producers are related in the aforementioned sense to companies subject to the measures in place on imports originating in the People's Republic of China, an exemption may still be granted if there is no evidence that the relationship with the companies subject to the original measures was established or used to circumvent the original measures.
(5) Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1).
(6) A ‘Limited’ document is a document which is considered confidential pursuant to Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 and Article 6 of the WTO Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the GATT 1994 (Anti-Dumping Agreement). It is also a document protected pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43).
17.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 40/70 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/273
of 16 February 2017
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),
Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto. |
(2) |
The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 February 2017.
For the Commission,
On behalf of the President,
Jerzy PLEWA
Director-General
Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development
ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
(EUR/100 kg) |
||
CN code |
Third country code (1) |
Standard import value |
0702 00 00 |
IL |
337,2 |
MA |
110,8 |
|
TN |
194,0 |
|
TR |
130,7 |
|
ZZ |
193,2 |
|
0707 00 05 |
MA |
64,9 |
TR |
183,3 |
|
ZZ |
124,1 |
|
0709 91 00 |
EG |
128,6 |
ZZ |
128,6 |
|
0709 93 10 |
MA |
54,7 |
TR |
180,1 |
|
ZZ |
117,4 |
|
0805 10 22 , 0805 10 24 , 0805 10 28 |
EG |
47,0 |
IL |
74,2 |
|
MA |
50,9 |
|
TN |
56,6 |
|
TR |
76,3 |
|
ZZ |
61,0 |
|
0805 21 10 , 0805 21 90 , 0805 29 00 |
EG |
93,2 |
IL |
123,2 |
|
JM |
122,7 |
|
MA |
93,3 |
|
TR |
85,5 |
|
ZZ |
103,6 |
|
0805 22 00 |
IL |
112,1 |
MA |
103,8 |
|
ZZ |
108,0 |
|
0805 50 10 |
EG |
82,4 |
TR |
98,6 |
|
ZZ |
90,5 |
|
0808 10 80 |
CN |
128,2 |
US |
103,9 |
|
ZZ |
116,1 |
|
0808 30 90 |
CL |
121,2 |
CN |
112,8 |
|
ZA |
127,0 |
|
ZZ |
120,3 |
(1) Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1106/2012 of 27 November 2012 implementing Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries, as regards the update of the nomenclature of countries and territories (OJ L 328, 28.11.2012, p. 7). Code ‘ZZ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
DECISIONS
17.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 40/72 |
DECISION (EU) 2017/274 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
of 10 February 2017
laying down the principles for providing performance feedback to national competent authority sub-coordinators and repealing Decision (EU) 2016/3 (ECB/2017/6)
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (1), and in particular Article 6(1) and (7) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 stipulates that the European Central Bank (ECB) is responsible for the effective and consistent functioning of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM). Recital 79 of that Regulation states that highly motivated, well-trained and impartial staff is indispensable to effective supervision. |
(2) |
In accordance with Articles 3 to 6 of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2014/17) (2), the ECB is in charge of the establishment and composition of joint supervisory teams composed of staff members from the ECB and the national competent authorities. A joint supervisory team (JST) coordinator, assisted by one or more national competent authority (NCA) sub-coordinators, ensures the coordination of the work within the JST. |
(3) |
In view of the NCA sub-coordinators' important role in coordinating the JST members from their NCA, it is necessary and proportionate to introduce a uniform process for the provision of performance feedback on NCA sub-coordinators in JSTs. By assisting with the continuous improvement of the NCA sub-coordinators' performance, this performance feedback might help to ensure the proper functioning of JSTs. |
(4) |
The NCAs are solely responsible for the appraisal of their staff, and the ECB is solely responsible for the appraisal of its staff. Nevertheless, NCAs may use the performance feedback provided in accordance with this Decision in the management of their staff members, and it may serve as input in the internal appraisal systems of the NCAs, if allowed under the relevant national law. |
(5) |
Feedback on the performance of NCA sub-coordinators was initially provided during a trial period in accordance with the principles laid down in Decision (EU) 2016/3 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2015/36) (3). As that trial period has concluded, that Decision should be repealed in the interests of legal certainty. |
(6) |
Experience gained during the trial period indicated that a performance feedback mechanism for NCA sub-coordinators may be useful to ensure the effective functioning of the JSTs. However further assessment is required. The performance feedback mechanism should therefore be continued for a further trial period of one year. A subsequent review should be carried out to assess if it would be useful for the performance feedback mechanism to continue on a more permanent basis. |
(7) |
The findings of the review should be reported to the Supervisory Board. In the light of the review, a proposal to the Governing Council should be made on whether or not the performance feedback mechanism should be continued. |
(8) |
The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) and delivered an opinion on 7 April 2015 recognising that performance feedback is necessary for the management of JSTs, and endorsing the performance feedback mechanism, while advising that its precise operation is defined in an appropriate legal instrument, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Definitions
For the purposes of this Decision, the definitions contained in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 (ECB/2014/17) shall apply.
Article 2
Performance feedback
1. JST coordinators shall provide performance feedback to NCA sub-coordinators on their and their team's performance in carrying out their tasks and objectives within the JST, in accordance with the principles set out in Annex I and shall take into account the competencies set out in Annex II.
2. JST coordinators shall, after consultation with the NCA sub-coordinator, lay down the NCA sub-coordinator's main tasks and objectives.
3. JST coordinators shall provide performance feedback with regard to the feedback cycle that starts on the day of the entry into force of this Decision and ends 12 months later.
Article 3
Review
After the performance feedback cycle ends, the ECB in collaboration with the NCAs, shall review the operation of the performance feedback mechanism and report its findings to the Supervisory Board. The report shall include a proposal on whether the performance feedback mechanism should be continued.
Article 4
Repeal
Decision (EU) 2016/3 (ECB/2015/36) is hereby repealed.
Article 5
Entry into force
This Decision shall enter into force on 15 February 2017.
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 10 February 2017.
For the Governing Council of the ECB
The President of the ECB
Mario DRAGHI
(1) OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 63.
(2) Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2014 establishing the framework for cooperation within the Single Supervisory Mechanism between the European Central Bank and national competent authorities and with national designated authorities (SSM Framework Regulation) (ECB/2014/17) (OJ L 141, 14.5.2014, p. 1).
(3) Decision (EU) 2016/3 of the European Central Bank of 18 November 2015 laying down the principles for providing feedback on the performance of national competent authorities' sub-coordinators in the joint supervisory teams of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (ECB/2015/36) (OJ L 1, 5.1.2016, p. 4).
(4) Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1).
ANNEX I
Principles for providing feedback on the performance of national competent authority sub-coordinators in joint supervisory teams of the Single Supervisory Mechanism
Principle 1
Scope of performance feedback
National competent authority (NCA) sub-coordinators in a joint supervisory team (JST) of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) are subject to performance feedback, provided that they work in the JST on the basis of at least 25 % of a full-time position as defined in the employment framework of the relevant NCA.
Principle 2
Purpose of performance feedback
To support and improve the functioning of the SSM as a whole, the performance feedback will assess the NCA sub-coordinator's performance when carrying out their tasks, with a view to further developing their understanding of the SSM's objectives and competencies as NCA sub-coordinators, thereby contributing to improving the performance and integration of JSTs.
Principle 3
Performance feedback process
1. |
At the beginning of the performance feedback cycle, the JST coordinator, after consultation with the NCA sub-coordinator, sets out the main tasks and objectives for each NCA sub-coordinator that is subject to performance feedback in accordance with Principle 1. These tasks and objectives are recorded in the SSM feedback form. |
2. |
The JST coordinator provides each NCA sub-coordinator with guidance and informal performance feedback throughout the performance feedback cycle. Once the feedback cycle is completed, the JST coordinator provides each NCA sub-coordinator with end-of-cycle performance feedback, both orally and in writing in the SSM performance feedback form. Before the feedback form is finalised, the sub-coordinator is given the opportunity to formally record their views and comments on the performance feedback provided. |
3. |
The informal and the end-of-cycle performance feedback take into account the NCA sub-coordinator's main tasks and objectives, the SSM competencies set out in Annex II, and their team's contribution to the overall functioning of the JST. |
Principle 4
Access to performance feedback
1. |
Upon request by the relevant NCA, the end-of cycle performance feedback will be made accessible to, and may be used by the relevant NCA for the purpose of facilitating its staff management, if permitted by applicable national law. |
2. |
NCAs may choose to use the performance feedback as additional input in their internal appraisal systems, if permitted by applicable national law. |
3. |
Access to the performance feedback, including its transfer, will be granted to NCAs in accordance with Article 8(a) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001. |
Principle 5
Protection of personal data processed in the context of giving performance feedback
1. |
The performance feedback data will be processed by the ECB in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001. |
2. |
The performance feedback data may be used only for the purposes described in Principles 2 and 4, and may be stored for a maximum period of five years. |
ANNEX II
List of competencies particularly relevant for staff working in the SSM (SSM competencies)
Professional knowledge : Knowledge of supervisory policies, methodologies and regulations, especially in the SSM context, as well as of financial institutions functioning. Keeps abreast of developments in those fields and applies the knowledge to the relevant areas of work.
Communication : Conveying information clearly and concisely to groups or individuals, either verbally or in writing, to ensure that they understand the information and the message. Listening and responding appropriately to others.
Cooperation and collaboration : Building and maintaining on-going, collaborative, working relationships with co-workers to achieve the European goals of the team. Developing and maintaining effective relationships with others in order to encourage and support teamwork. Proactively sharing data, information and knowledge within the team.
Determination in achieving objectives : Performing tasks with tenacity and perseverance, pursuing successful solutions while adapting own behaviour to find a suitable approach to reach a successful outcome.
Judgement and intrusiveness : Analysing and assessing situations, data and information in order to develop appropriate strategies, plans and policies. Understanding and formulating different and opposing perspectives on an issue, if needed, adapting approaches as the requirements of a situation change, considering problems from new perspectives and expanding on the thinking or solutions proposed by others. Attempting to fully understand issues prior to making a recommendation or reaching a conclusion, while gathering full and exact information as necessary; arriving at a sound judgement by respectfully asking a series of intrusive questions; and continuously scanning for potential issues and various information.
Breadth of awareness and being forward-looking : Looking beyond the own role to establish the wider context in which one operates, by having a full understanding of the different functions/areas, by showing awareness of diverse cultural contexts and points of view, and by assessing the implications of own decisions on others. Looking ahead and anticipating opportunities and threats in the future, taking action to create opportunities or to avert a future issue.
Acting objectively with integrity and independence : Acting independently and objectively, in the interest of the Union as a whole, on the basis of the professional standards of the SSM, verifying circumstances to get a complete and realistic picture of a situation. Striving to reduce or eliminate biases, prejudices, or subjective evaluations by relying on verifiable data and facts.
Managing SSM teams (applicable to managers only) : Directing (virtual/remote) teams and guiding them to the team objectives. Coordinating team activities across boundaries, by providing direction and by using their competencies and diversity in the most effective and efficient way. Working to reduce and cope with ambiguity and finding ways to direct and deliver under uncertainty.
Corrigenda
17.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 40/78 |
Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2014/955/EU of 18 December 2014 amending Decision 2000/532/EC on the list of waste pursuant to Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
( Official Journal of the European Union L 370 of 30 December 2014 )
On page 44, recital 5:
for:
‘[…] It is appropriate to refer to Council Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 […]’,
read:
‘[…] It is appropriate to refer to Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 […]’;
on page 44, footnote 7:
for:
‘Council Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (OJ L 142 31.5.2008, p. 1).’,
read:
‘Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (OJ L 142 31.5.2008, p. 1).’.