(1)

The achievement of the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) should not be undermined by operators violating CFP rules. Pursuant to Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2), financial assistance from the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (‘EMFF’) is made conditional upon compliance by operators with CFP rules.

(2)

According to Article 42(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, serious infringements by operators of the CFP rules are to result in temporary or permanent bans on access to Union financial assistance. Such measures are to be dissuasive, effective, and proportionate.

(3)

In order to safeguard the financial interest of the Union and its taxpayers, operators that, within a particular time before submitting an application for financial assistance, committed serious infringements, offence or fraud as set out in Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 should not benefit from financial assistance from the EMFF.

(4)

Operators applying for EMFF support should be clearly identifiable in order to verify the admissibility of their applications. In order to attain the objectives of the conditionality of EMFF support, it is appropriate to lay down the necessary provisions ensuring that such operators comply with the conditions of admissibility for EMFF support in relation to all fishing vessels under their effective control.

(5)

In accordance with Article 10(4) of Regulation (EU) No 508/2014, the duration of the inadmissibility period shall be proportionate to the nature, gravity, duration and repetition of the serious infringement, offence or fraud. It is therefore necessary to lay down rules for calculation of the duration of inadmissibility and to identify the relevant starting and ending dates of the inadmissibility period.

(6)

In accordance with Article 42(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 and Article 10(4)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 508/2014, where the competent authority has determined that an operator has committed a serious infringement, an application from that operator is to be inadmissible for EMFF support for a period of at least 12 months. As Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 applies as from 1 January 2014, in order to ensure proportionality and legal certainty only serious infringements determined by a decision taken as from 1 January 2013 should be taken into account for the calculation of the inadmissibility period.

(7)

Nevertheless, an immediate and automatic trigger of inadmissibility for EMFF support would be disproportionate in infringement cases which, while maintaining their serious character as determined by the competent authorities, do not necessarily directly cause a serious prejudice to the fishing resources and the marine environment referred to in Article 90(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 (3). Such cases would include, for instance, minor instances of misreporting of catches which should not result as such in the immediate inadmissibility of applications for EMFF support.

(8)

Serious infringements related to the taking on board, transshipping or landing of undersized fish should be appraised in relation to the gradual entry into force of the elimination of discards as envisaged by the CFP. It appears unnecessary and inappropriate to immediately render inadmissible applications for EMFF support by operators having committed such infringements.

(9)

In those exceptional cases referred to in recitals (7) and (8), in order to ensure that the inadmissibility of applications by operators for EMFF support complies with the principle of proportionality, it is appropriate to base the calculation of the period of inadmissibility on the already established system of points assigned for certain serious infringements as laid down in Article 92 of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, and Article 126 and Annex XXX of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011 (4). In those exceptional cases listed in points 1, 2, and 5 of Annex XXX to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011, the starting date of the application and calculation of inadmissibility period should be defined with regard to Article 126(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011.

(10)

In accordance with Article 92(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, if the holder of a fishing licence does not commit, within three years from the date of the last serious infringement, another serious infringement, all points on its fishing licence should be deleted. As a consequence, points on a fishing licence remain valid at least three years. As the provisions of the EMFF apply as from 1 January 2014, in order to ensure proportionality and legal certainty, points for serious infringements listed in points 1, 2, and 5 of Annex XXX to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011 should be taken into account for the calculation of the inadmissibility period, only if assigned as from 1 January 2013.

(11)

Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing constitutes one of the most serious threats to the sustainable exploitation of living aquatic resources and fundamentally undermines the achievement of the CFP objectives. It is therefore appropriate to lay down rules on inadmissibility of applications for EMFF support from operators of fishing vessels flagged to countries included in the Union list of vessels engaged in IUU fishing or of vessels flagged to countries identified as non-cooperating third countries.

(12)

Article 10(3) of Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 provides that applications submitted by operators who have committed a fraud in the context of the European Fisheries Fund (‘EFF’) or the EMFF will be inadmissible for a certain period of time. As fraud constitutes one of the biggest threats to the financial interests of the Union and of its taxpayers, and in order to provide for a harmonised and equal treatment of operators in all Member States, rules appropriate to the gravity of such threat should be defined as regards the period during which applications submitted by operators who committed such fraud will be inadmissible.

(13)

In order to ensure proportionate and effective application of rules on inadmissibility of applications by operators for EMFF support, it is appropriate to lay down rules for calculation of the inadmissibility periods in cases where a single operator owns more than one fishing vessel. These rules should ensure that EMFF support does not benefit fishing vessels that were used to commit serious infringements resulting in the inadmissibility of applications by those operators. It is also appropriate to lay down rules for revision of the inadmissibility period where further serious infringements are committed by an operator during the inadmissibility period.

(14)

Rules should be laid down to ensure fair treatment of operators who become new owners of fishing vessels following a sale or other type of transfer of ownership while at the same time not undermining the Union system for control, inspection and enforcement laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 which is necessary to achieve the objectives of the CFP.

(15)

Should an operator's fishing license be permanently withdrawn due to the high frequency and gravity of the infringements committed, the introduction of a ban on access to EMFF support until the end of the eligibility period laid down in Article 65(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (5) is justified by the need to safeguard the financial interests of the Union and of its taxpayers. The ban would be justified even if according to the calculation method laid down in this Regulation the inadmissibility period ends before the end of the eligibility period.

(16)

In accordance with Article 10(5) of Regulation (EU) No 508/2014, Member States are to require operators submitting an application under the EMFF to provide to the managing authority a signed statement confirming that they comply with criteria laid down in Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 and have not committed a fraud under the EFF or the EMFF as referred to in Article 10(3) of that Regulation. Member States are also to verify the veracity of that statement. Member States should ensure that the application of national rules concerning the suspensory effects of review proceedings do not render the rules on determination of inadmissibility period ineffective.

(17)

Concerning cases of serious infringements and offences referred to in Article 10(1)(c) and (d) of Regulation (EU) No 508/2014, those cases will need to be further assessed and analysed to ensure that the duration of the inadmissibility period is proportionate to the nature, gravity, duration and repetition of those serious infringements and offences. Following that analysis, this Regulation should be amended.

(18)

In order to allow for the prompt application of the measures provided for in this Regulation and given the importance of ensuring a harmonised and equal treatment of operators in all Member States from the start of the programming period, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication and apply from the first day of the eligibility period of the EMFF, namely 1 January 2014,

(1)

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)

The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 391/2013 (2) lays down a common charging scheme for air navigation services. The common charging scheme is an integral element in reaching the objectives of the performance scheme established under Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3) and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 (4).

(2)

Commission Decision 2011/121/EU (5) set Union-wide performance targets, including a cost-efficiency target for the provision of air navigation services for the years 2012 to 2014. By letters of 19 July 2012 and 17 December 2012, the Commission informed the Member States that their revised performance plans and targets are consistent with, and adequately contributing to, the adopted Union-wide performance targets. Cost-efficiency targets are expressed in terms of determined unit rates.

(3)

Pursuant to Article 17(1)(b) and (c) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 391/2013, the Commission is to assess on a yearly basis the unit rates for charging zones, submitted by the Member States to the Commission, against the provisions of that Regulation and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013.

(4)

In 2013, the Commission carried out its assessment of the 2014 unit rates for charging zones with the support of the Performance Review Body (PRB) and Eurocontrol's Central Route Charges Office, using the data and additional information provided by Member States. As a consequence, it adopted Commission Decision 2013/631/EU (6). By means of that Decision the Commission notified the Member States, in accordance with Article 17(1)(d) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 391/2013, that it had found that the 2014 unit rates for charging zones submitted to it are in compliance with Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013.

(5)

Subsequent to the adoption of Decision 2013/631/EU, in 2014, Bulgaria, Denmark, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia informed the Commission about changes in certain parameters for the calculation of the respective unit rates, which were not known to them at the time of submitting the initial data and additional information to the Commission for its compliance assessment and which necessitated certain corrections to the 2014 unit rates concerned. Those six Member States therefore submitted corrected units rates to the Commission.

(6)

In accordance with Article 17(1)(c) and (d) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 391/2013, the Commission has assessed those corrected 2014 unit rates for charging zones in Bulgaria, Denmark, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia against the provisions of Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013 and concluded that they are compliant. This finding should therefore be notified to the Member States concerned.

(7)

In the interest of clarity and transparency, Decision 2013/631/EU should be repealed and replaced by this Decision.

(8)

The notification that unit rates for charging zones are in compliance with Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013 is without prejudice to Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 550/2004.

(9)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Single Sky Committee,