ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 15 April 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

(EUR/100 kg)
CN code	Third country code (1)	Standard import value
0702 00 00	MA	69,6
	TN	115,9
	TR	109,1
	ZZ	98,2
0707 00 05	JO	178,8
	MA	43,7
	TR	150,5
	ZZ	124,3
0709 90 70	MA	97,2
	TR	105,2
	ZZ	101,2
0805 10 20	EG	53,4
	IL	59,3
	MA	56,1
	TN	53,2
	TR	56,0
	US	55,6
	ZZ	55,6
0805 50 10	AR	117,4
	IL	117,6
	TR	129,6
	ZA	134,8
	ZZ	124,9
0808 10 80	AR	81,7
	BR	82,8
	CA	79,6
	CL	81,8
	CN	92,0
	MK	57,9
	NZ	124,5
	US	102,4
	UY	73,5
	ZA	73,0
	ZZ	84,9
0808 20 50	AR	83,5
	AU	93,7
	CL	92,9
	CN	47,6
	ZA	95,7
	ZZ	82,7

---

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘ ZZ ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

ANNEX I

Import duties on the products referred to in Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 16 April 2008

CN code	Description	Import duties (1) (EUR/t)
1001 10 00	Durum wheat, high quality	0,00  (*1)
	medium quality	0,00  (*1)
	low quality	0,00  (*1)
1001 90 91	Common wheat seed	0,00
ex 1001 90 99	High quality common wheat, other than for sowing	0,00  (*1)
1002 00 00	Rye	0,00  (*1)
1005 10 90	Maize seed other than hybrid	0,00
1005 90 00	Maize, other than seed (2)	0,00  (*1)
1007 00 90	Grain sorghum other than hybrids for sowing	0,00  (*1)

---

(1)  For goods arriving in the Community via the Atlantic Ocean or via the Suez Canal the importer may benefit, under Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96, from a reduction in the duty of:

—	3 EUR/t, where the port of unloading is on the Mediterranean Sea, or

—	2 EUR/t, where the port of unloading is in Denmark, Estonia, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Finland, Sweden, the United Kingdom or the Atlantic coast of the Iberian peninsula.

(2)  The importer may benefit from a flatrate reduction of EUR 24 per tonne where the conditions laid down in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 are met.

(*1)  In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1/2008, application of this duty is suspended.

ANNEX II

Factors for calculating the duties laid down in Annex I

1.4.2008-14.4.2008

1.

Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96: (EUR/t)   Common wheat (*1) Maize Durum wheat, high quality Durum wheat, medium quality (*2) Durum wheat, low quality (*3) Barley Exchange Minnéapolis Chicago — — — — Quotation 313,39 148,60 — — — — Fob price USA — — 334,99 324,99 304,99 161,68 Gulf of Mexico premium — 11,27 — — — — Great Lakes premium 20,07 — — — — —

2.

Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96: Freight costs: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 41,07  EUR/t Freight costs: Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 35,41  EUR/t

---

(*1)  Premium of 14 EUR/t incorporated (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*2)  Discount of 10 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*3)  Discount of 30 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

A.   Letter from the Government of Ukraine

Kiev, 11 December 2007

Your Excellency,

In the context of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, and Ukraine of 14 June 1994, and pursuant to negotiations on the accession of Ukraine to the World Trade Organisation, the purpose of this letter is to confirm that duties applied by Ukraine to goods originating therein and exported to the European Community shall be eliminated upon the entry into force of an EU-Ukraine Free Trade Area agreement, to be negotiated after finalisation of Ukraine’s WTO accession process, in the framework of a new Enhanced Agreement.

I propose that this letter and your reply to it will establish a formal agreement between us.

This Agreement will enter into force as from the date on which the European Community receives a written notification from Ukraine to the effect that it has completed the necessary internal procedures.

I confirm that this letter and your reply establish a formal agreement between us.

Please accept, Your Excellency, the assurance of my highest consideration.

B.   Letter from the European Community

Brussels, 1 April 2008

Your Excellency,

I confirm the receipt of the letter from the Government of Ukraine dated 11 December 2007 for which I thank you, and which reads as follows:

I confirm that the above-quoted letter and my reply will establish a formal agreement between us.

Please accept, Your Excellency, the assurance of my highest consideration.

ANNEX

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECTS TO BE FINANCED

1.   General objectives

The overall objective of this Joint Action is to support, through the projects described below, the implementation of the BTWC, in particular those aspects that relate to the safety and security of microbial or other biological agents and toxins in laboratories and other facilities, including during transportation as appropriate, in order to prevent unauthorised access to and removal of such agents and toxins.

It is also to contribute to raising awareness of bio-risk management practices and to promote, especially through Project 2, the harmonisation of good national laboratory practices and biological agent response with overall national biological preparedness.

2.   Project-based specific objectives

The projects described below will address three areas of major concern in the accidental and deliberate spread of diseases:

1.

The risk of terrorists or other criminals having access to dangerous biological pathogens/toxins. The intention of terrorists to acquire and to use the disease as a weapon must be contained. Such events as the anthrax spore-laden letters in the US in 2001 have the potential to create huge political and economic disturbances.

2.

A considerable increase in new laboratories in general, but in particular in high-level containment laboratories which lag behind in respecting adequate bio-safety and bio-security standards. In recent years, a considerable number of countries, including countries which have limited resources, have allocated funds to construct high level containment laboratories. While this should allow the country’s scientists to gain experience in the handling of dangerous pathogens like the SARS coronavirus, or viral hemorrhagic fever viruses, it may also bring about risks, especially in countries which are not able to reserve sufficient funds for the long-term maintenance of their facilities and do not provide adequate training for staff.

3.

The occurrence of laboratory incidents and accidental releases of highly dangerous bio-materials due to inadequate bio-safety and bio-security practices in laboratories and other facilities, and lack of compliance with the UN infectious substance packaging and shipping regulations. Three separate SARS laboratory accidents in Asia in 2003 and 2004 and the recent death from laboratory acquired Ebola haemorrhagic fever infection in Russia as well as deficiencies in bio-safety practices leading to laboratory acquired infections (tularemia and meliodosis) in the US are examples demonstrating the associated risks involved in inadequate bio-safety and laboratory bio-security, the improvement of which requires stronger commitment through management practices and the training of staff irrespective of the type of laboratory environment (human, animal or agricultural) in which the worker operates.

2.1.   Project 1: Promotion of bio-risk reduction management through regional and national outreach

Purpose of the project

The purpose of this project is to encourage States to assume responsibility for developing programmes to avoid accidental exposure or release and to prevent deliberate misappropriation or misuse of bio-agents in the laboratories. The project will involve national health policy makers as well as laboratory managers and laboratory staff to encourage their commitment to a bio-safety/bio-security culture. The project will also contribute to the development of bio-risk reduction programmes at national, regional and international levels, including through the networking of laboratories and through a harmonised bio-safety and laboratory bio-security definition in the countries of the region, with the aim of promoting transparency and commitment to bioethics (including the promotion of non-proliferation). Particular attention will be given to cross-sector networking between public health and other sectors such as animal health and the environment, to ensure a coordinated and comprehensive approach to bio-risk reduction.

Results of the project

(i)

Regions and countries will become engaged in active dialogue on the issues related to the safety and security of dangerous bio-agents and toxins in laboratories and other facilities.

(ii)

Existing laboratory bio-safety and bio-security practices will be mapped.

(iii)

The development of national plans will be supported, in particular in compliance with IHR, pathogen regulations and control measures to enhance safety and security in the handling of highly infectious materials.

(iv)

Training curricula will be developed, designed to keep policy makers, laboratory managers and laboratory staff engaged in bio-risk reduction practices. (They will include bio-ethics and the promotion of the Codes of Conduct).

(v)

Means will be provided for connecting national stakeholders among themselves and with international organisations (including the FAO, the OIE and the IPPC), so as to sustain their activities and help them become responsible global partners in regional professional societies and international networks.

Description of the project

(a)   Regional outreach workshops to raise bio-risk reduction management awareness and to envisage concrete country-focused operational initiatives in the field of bio-safety and bio-security

In 2006, the WHO organised bio-risk reduction management awareness-raising workshops in Central and South America, Eastern Mediterranean countries and English-speaking African countries. It will complete this first general awareness-raising cycle of outreach in the remaining regions, and will ensure a follow-up to these efforts through more focused outreach to respond to specific needs of the countries in the selected regions, including on bio-ethics and the Codes of Conduct. In order to avoid duplication of effort and to coordinate and harmonise approaches, the WHO will consult with relevant stakeholders and donors (international actors and non-governmental organisations) on the ongoing projects and needs for assistance.

Five regional workshops are planned, which may target the following regions: sub-Saharan Africa, South America, South and Southeast Asia, East Asia/Western Pacific, Central Asia and Eastern European countries (including Russia).

(b)   Consultations with relevant competent authorities to commit them to bio-risk reduction management in the health sector

The WHO will consult with the competent authorities in the relevant sectors and with the managers of the reference libraries to encourage their commitment to bio-risk reduction management. At least four visits are planned. The countries to be visited will be selected through a consultation process within the Steering Committee, and the selection of the countries will reflect their commitment to the implementation of the non-proliferation policy.

(c)   In-depth topic specific workshops on bio-risk reduction practices

The WHO will arrange at least two regional workshops to discuss specific topics aimed at deepening the understanding of the elements of bio-risk reduction practices, with health policy makers as well as laboratory managers and staff. Issues relating to legislation and management will be addressed, as well as how to plan for sustainability of the programmes through networks, seminars and professional societies. The seminars will target primarily Eastern Mediterranean and Eastern European countries, or other countries relevant for the selection process in Project 2.

2.2.   Project 2: Strengthening the security and laboratory management practices against biological risks (a demonstration model for countries)

Purposes of the project

(i)

To map and assess public health response capacity, in particular in respect of biological agents and toxins, in the context of enhancing national biological preparedness by connecting the health sector with the sectors of foreign affairs, justice, environment, commerce, agriculture (and animal health), intelligence.

(ii)

To develop a forum to keep the relevant national actors informed and connected with regard to public health preparedness and response capacity.

(iii)

To develop a bio-risk reduction management plan, particularly concerning laboratory practice and safety, and to harmonise it with integrated national preparedness plans.

(iv)

To implement the national bio-risk reduction management plan, in particular concerning laboratory practice and safety.

(v)

To map and strengthen the performance, capacity and sustainability of national laboratories by connecting them with regional and international laboratory networks.

Results of the project

(i)

The programme of the selected country will be strengthened, to minimise biological risks.

(ii)

Among national stakeholders, there will be improved understanding of and trust created in the role of the public health sector in biological incident response.

(iii)

The bio-laboratory component will be connected with national stakeholders in biological incident response.

(iv)

Improved laboratory safety, quality and performance.

(v)

Continuance of recognised laboratory quality and connectivity will be assured through regional and international validation.

(vi)

The country will be provided with meeting laboratory core capacity in compliance with the IHR.

Description of the project

For the purposes described above, the project will be implemented over an appropriate period which requires a long-term commitment by both the applicant country and the EU. The project will be implemented in phases. An EU-sponsored seconded expert should be appointed as a country project leader.

Preparatory phase

The WHO will identify a number of candidate countries for the project, with a view to recommending to EU Member States a suitable candidate through the Steering Committee. The selection criteria will reflect as a priority non-proliferation concerns. The WHO and the Presidency, assisted by the SG/HR, will conduct exploratory discussions with the candidate countries. Based on the progress of those discussions, the WHO will conduct preliminary country pre-assessment visits, relevant for the next phase of the project. The WHO will appoint a project officer, who shall be a national of one of the EU Member States.

As a result of this preparatory process, a memorandum of understanding will be signed by the EU (represented for this purpose by the Presidency, assisted by the SG/HR), the WHO and the selected country.

Assessment phase

In the assessment phase, the WHO will conduct an assessment of national biological activities and assets in the selected country, and will assist with their harmonisation with national preparedness for and response to biological incidents. This will include the completion of the bio-incidents evaluation exercise and of the coordination plan to inform all stakeholders of the status of national preparedness against biological incidents, and the initiation of the harmonisation of public health responsibilities in the national preparedness plan for biological threats and/or incidents as well as public health emergencies of international concern.

Technical assistance phase

In this phase, the aim is to strengthen laboratory practices to respond to a public health event of international concern and to ensure that laboratory performance is safe and its results are validated at the national, regional and international levels. To achieve these goals, training will be provided for the responsible stakeholders in the public health area and in the biological response. Laboratory infrastructure plans will be developed and country bio-safety professionals will be connected with international networks, including through participation in the annual meetings and conferences of the international bio-safety associations.

Evaluation phase

The WHO will prepare, on a quarterly basis and in cooperation with the selected country, reports evaluating the implementation of national biological preparedness plans as well as national laboratory performance from the bio-safety and bio-security perspective, and will forward these evaluation reports to the Presidency, assisted by the SG/HR, and to the Commission.

3.   Duration

The total estimated duration of the implementation of this Joint Action is 24 months.

4.   Beneficiaries

The beneficiaries are States Parties to the BTWC or States which have initiated the ratification/accession process. The Joint Action targets primarily countries and regions which are vulnerable because of unsafe practices in biological laboratories, contributing to an increased risk of the loss, theft and misuse of high-consequence micro-organisms and their products.

5.   Implementing entity

The Presidency, assisted by the SG/HR, is responsible for the implementation and supervision of the implementation of the Joint Action. The Presidency is to entrust the technical implementation to the WHO.

The projects will be implemented by WHO staff in cooperation, as appropriate, with (experts from) WHO Member States, in particular the EU Member States. Where recruiting new staff for the implementation of the project, preference should be given to nationals of the EU Member States. The implementation of the Joint Action will be supervised by a Steering Committee consisting of representatives of the WHO, the EU Presidency assisted by the SG/HR and the Commission. The Steering Committee will hold meetings as necessary, but at least twice a year, in order to review progress and to discuss issues relating to implementation. This is to ensure harmonisation of the overall project implementation and evaluation reports. The Steering Committee will also serve as a mechanism for the selection of countries for Project 1(b) and Project 2.