26.9.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/3

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 28 July 2022

on a proposal for a regulation amending the Central Securities Depositories Regulation

(CON/2022/25)

(2022/C 367/03)

Introduction and legal basis

On 13 April 2022 the European Central Bank (ECB) received a request from the Council for an opinion on a proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories (1) (hereinafter the ‘proposed regulation’).

The ECB’s competence to deliver an opinion on the proposed regulation is based on Articles 127(4) and 282(5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), as the proposed regulation touches upon (1) the basic task of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) to promote the smooth operation of payment systems pursuant to Article 127(2), fourth indent, TFEU, and Article 3.1 of the Statute of the ESCB and the ECB (hereinafter the ‘Statute of the ESCB’), and (2) the ESCB’s contribution to the smooth conduct of policies pursued by the competent authorities relating to the stability of the financial system pursuant to Article 127(5) TFEU and Article 3.3 of the Statute of the ESCB. In accordance with the first sentence of Article 17.5 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank, the Governing Council has adopted this opinion.

General observations

The ECB welcomes the proposed regulation, which supports both the priorities of the Union in the areas of capital markets and post-trading, and one of the core actions in the Commission’s 2020 Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan to develop cross-border settlement services. It does this, inter alia, by simplifying the passporting process under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) (hereinafter the ‘Central Securities Depositories Regulation’, or the ‘CSDR’) and enhancing cooperation among competent and relevant authorities. The ECB strongly supports the general aim of further facilitating capital markets integration by reducing barriers to the cross-border provision of settlement services. The proposed regulation is also broadly aligned with policies pursued internationally in the aftermath of the global financial crisis that emerged in 2008-2009, aimed at reinforcing the resilience and effectiveness of core, systemically important financial market infrastructures – including securities settlement systems – as a precondition for sound and robust capital markets, and the promotion of financial stability (3).

Specific observations

1. Settlement discipline regime

1.1.

The ECB welcomes the Union legislator’s objective to establish a more targeted scope for the CSDR’s settlement discipline regime by addressing market behaviours that lead to settlement inefficiencies, but without automatically penalising every individual settlement fail regardless of the context and parties involved. The scope and functioning of the settlement discipline regime should be based on the principle of proportionality. This requires, inter alia, differentiating between, on the one hand, settlement fails that produce adverse financial effects for the non-failing party to a financial transaction, and, on the other hand, those that either produce no adverse financial effects at all or merely affect the financial interests of the failing party. The inclusion of these latter settlement fails within the scope of the settlement discipline regime would be inconsistent with the regime’s rationale. Therefore, the review of the settlement discipline regime should take as its starting point the aim of sanctioning only those settlement fails that result in adverse financial effects for the counterparty of the failing party.

1.2.

In the same vein, the ECB welcomes the proposed exclusions from the settlement discipline regime of both settlement fails caused by factors not attributable to the participants to the transaction, and settlement fails occurring in the context of transactions that do not involve ‘two trading parties’. However, the ECB invites the Union legislator to consider clarifying the scope of the second of these two proposed exclusions, which lends itself to different interpretations. The ECB understands this proposed exclusion as encompassing free-of-payment (FOP) securities transfers to securities accounts at central securities depositories (CSDs) in the context of the (de)mobilisation of collateral, whether those transfers are between private parties or between members of the ESCB and their counterparties. The ECB would welcome an explicit clarification to this effect in the proposed regulation. In this respect, further clarifications on the scope of the second proposed exclusion should be provided in the delegated acts of the Commission, to specify the transactions that are not considered as involving two trading parties. CSDs might not at present be equipped to identify settlement instructions that are to be excluded from the scope of the settlement discipline regime under the proposed regulation. To facilitate such identification, the delegated acts of the Commission could helpfully include definitions that enable the envisaged exclusions to be concretely identified, thereby assisting CSDs in reaching an automated process. The ECB stands ready to support the Union legislator in the elaboration of these clarifications, and notes that the Commission draft delegated acts qualify as ‘proposed Union acts’ for the purposes of Articles 127(4) and 282(5) of the Treaty, which provides that the ECB must be consulted on any draft Union acts falling within its fields of competence (4).

1.3.

In addition, such Commission delegated acts that specify the transactions that are not to be considered as involving two trading parties should contemplate sufficient lead time for CSDs and financial market participants to adjust their systems. For instance, as regards TARGET2-Securities (T2S), if certain transactions are to be excluded from the scope of the settlement discipline regime at CSD level, a dialogue with the market would be advisable to help identify potential implementation issues and possible solutions. Where the relevant Commission delegated acts entail material changes to the design of T2S, the implementation of such changes would require significant time. Hence, the ECB recommends that the period of 24 months which the proposed regulation contemplates between the adoption of the revised CSDR and the entry into force of the amended scope of the settlement discipline regime (5) should only start from the adoption of the relevant Commission delegated acts.

1.4.

The existence of regulation-driven mandatory buy-ins is a significant interference in the execution of securities transactions and the functioning of securities markets. Because of the implications that the deployment by the European Commission of mandatory buy-ins may have (including with respect to the potential non-availability of a buy-in agent), it would be preferable to discard the possibility of mandatory buy-ins altogether. Any later changes in this regard should be left to the subsequent consideration of the Union legislator.

1.5.

If, nevertheless, the Union legislator decides to retain the proposed provisions regarding the implementing act by the European Commission for the deployment of the mandatory buy-in mechanism, the ECB would like to note the following points. First, the ECB welcomes the proposed regulation’s revisions to the mandatory buy-in mechanism. The application, through an implementing act, of conditions for activating a mandatory buy-in mechanism in respect of certain financial instruments or categories of transactions should be weighed against the impact of mandatory buy-ins on the functioning of securities markets. Furthermore, such an implementing act should take into account the potential effects of the mandatory buy-in mechanism on the financial stability of the Union and on settlement efficiency in the Union (6) – both of which are matters that should be considered as falling within the ECB’s fields of advisory competence – and such an implementing act should therefore be submitted for ECB consultation prior to its adoption. It should also afford market participants sufficient time for implementation so that they can achieve operational readiness. Regarding the requirements related to the modalities applicable to the execution of buy-ins, it is important that the costs of execution should not be disproportionate to the value exchanged in the underlying transaction. Moreover, in accordance with the proportionality principle, some measure of flexibility should be given to market participants to whom the buy-in would apply in a given case. Consideration should be given to an approach whereby, instead of legislation prescribing the exact method of executing buy-ins, market participants are required to contractually agree on such details between themselves. In addition, an option could be given to the non-failing party to decide whether or not the buy-in process is to be triggered. This flexibility would enable a non-failing party to avoid the disproportionate burden of the implementation of complex operational, technical and legal changes necessary for the use of buy-ins.

1.6.

Finally, the ECB invites the Union legislator to consider excluding securities financing transactions from the scope of any mandatory buy-ins. A securities financing transaction does not create an outright open position between the trading parties such as to justify a buy-in against the failing party. Accordingly, the application of mandatory buy-ins in the context of securities financing transactions would not be proportionate to the intention of the legislator to reduce, through mandatory buy-ins, the number of settlement fails.

2. Cooperation between competent authorities and relevant authorities: review and evaluation

2.1.

The ECB welcomes the enhancement under the proposed regulation of the role of the relevant authorities in the authorisation of CSDs to provide core services and banking-type ancillary services, as well as in the conduct of the regular review and evaluation of CSDs, that duly acknowledges the legitimate interest that such authorities have in the smooth functioning of the relevant infrastructures. By the same token, the ECB welcomes the balanced approach of the proposed regulation as regards the frequency of conducting the review and evaluation of core CSD services, as well as the longer timeframe within which the relevant authorities may provide a reasoned opinion on the authorisation of CSDs to provide banking-type ancillary services. To ensure consistency, there would be merit in aligning the proposed minimum frequency with which the competent authorities review and evaluate compliance with the CSDR of banking-type ancillary services with the frequency of the review and evaluation of core CSD services.

2.2.

As regards the review and evaluation of core CSD services, the proposed regulation envisages that a competent authority consults the relevant authorities. However, no corresponding procedure is contemplated as regards the review and evaluation of banking-type ancillary services. To address this inconsistency, the ECB recommends introducing in the proposed regulation a corresponding consultation procedure for the review and evaluation of banking-type ancillary services.

2.3.

For those ESCB members that act as a relevant authority, such a consultation procedure would facilitate the performance of the ESCB’s task to ensure efficient and sound clearing systems within the Union. Moreover, in the conduct of their day-to-day activities, CSDs authorised as providers of banking-type ancillary services rely heavily on central bank services (7), further warranting the involvement of central banks. The safety and efficiency of cash settlements in commercial bank money are particularly relevant for central banks of issue, as inadequate management of credit and liquidity risks by the CSDs providing banking type-ancillary services could affect the smooth functioning of money markets.

2.4.

In their role as overseers of clearing and payments systems, central banks have extensive expertise in the field of cash settlement in central bank and commercial bank money (including associated banking-type ancillary services), in particular from the perspective of the management of financial risks. In conducting their oversight activities, central banks apply a framework which – in line with global standards – reflects a systemic perspective. Therefore, their involvement as relevant authorities under the CSDR in the regular review and evaluation of banking-type ancillary services is advisable.

3. Cooperation among competent authorities and relevant authorities: establishment of colleges

3.1.

The ECB welcomes the introduction of colleges of supervisors in order to enhance supervisory convergence and facilitate information exchanges among involved authorities (8). Nevertheless, the structure of the passporting colleges could benefit from further adjustments to ensure, on the one hand, that various types of cross-border activity are covered and, on the other hand, that the cooperation within the college is efficient and does not create a burden where participation in multiple colleges is required. The passporting activity does not include all CSD services with a cross-border dimension. Therefore, the ECB proposes to widen the scope of the passporting colleges’ mandate to cover other types of cross-border activities, including settlement in relevant foreign currencies and the operation of interoperable links, except for interoperable links of CSDs that outsource some of their services (related to those interoperable links) to a public entity as referred to in Article 19(5) of the CSDR (9). The ECB also proposes to rename the passporting colleges as cross-border activity colleges. Moreover, participation in the colleges is crucial for the authorities of Member States where the activities of a CSD are important to their markets. However, it might be less relevant for the authorities of Member States where the activity of a CSD is limited, and should not be mandatory.

3.2.

As regards group colleges, the ECB supports their establishment and, in particular, the optionality introduced in the proposed regulation to merge colleges into one single college. In addition, further flexibility could be introduced by allowing the home competent authority to invite the competent and relevant authorities from countries that are not Member States as observers for both passporting and/or group colleges.

4. Banking-type ancillary services

4.1.

The proposed regulation includes amendments to the CSDR allowing the settlement of the cash payments in a securities settlement system operated by a CSD through another CSD that is authorised to provide banking-type ancillary services. Together with the proposed increase of the threshold for settlement via designated credit institutions, these amendments would facilitate settlement in foreign currencies, and promote cross-border settlement within the Union. At the same time, the potential recourse to FOP settlement where cash and securities transfers are not conditional on each other - and therefore increase settlement risk – would be limited.

4.2.

Nevertheless, the provision of banking-type ancillary services by CSDs authorised to provide them (hereinafter the ‘banking CSDs’) to other CSDs (hereinafter the ‘user CSDs’) would have implications for the financial risk profile of the banking CSDs and for the level playing field for CSDs and for participants in the securities settlement systems that the CSDs operate, as well as in relation to conflicts of interest; all of these implications would need to be further addressed by the Union legislator. Therefore, the proposed regulation could be amended to include the possibility of developing regulatory technical standards to address the implications described in paragraphs 4.3 to 4.8 below of the provision of banking-type ancillary services by banking CSDs to user CSDs.

4.3.

Article 40 of the CSDR requires CSDs to settle the cash leg of securities transactions processed in their securities settlement systems through accounts held with a central bank specifically for transactions denominated in the currency of the country where the settlement takes place, where practical and available. The amendments envisaged by the proposed regulation should neither lead to an unintended shift from settlement in central bank money to settlement in commercial bank money, nor disincentivise the efforts of CSDs to achieve settlement in central bank money. In this respect, it should be noted that currently, subject to one exception, all national central banks of the Member States allow access to central bank money settlement for non-domestic Union CSDs and their participants. However, settlement in central bank money for non-Union currencies may be difficult to achieve.

4.4.

While the objective of the amendments envisaged by the proposed regulation is to facilitate settlement in foreign currencies (10), they also open the possibility to the banking CSDs to offer, without restriction, any banking-type ancillary service to user CSDs. The scope of services to be offered by banking CSDs to user CSDs should be limited to services which are provided for the purposes of settlement in foreign currencies. Such a limitation would prevent the banking CSDs from engaging in a broad range of activities and taking excessive risks. In addition, such a limitation would also discourage user CSDs from seeking the services of banking CSDs where, for EU currencies, cash settlement in central bank money would also be available.

4.5.

The provision by CSDs of banking-type ancillary services to user CSDs would entail additional exposures. In particular, the services that a banking CSD could provide to user CSDs would generate financial risks for the CSDs (e.g. investment, credit and/or liquidity risks) (11). The magnitude of these risks depends on the scope of services availed of by the user CSDs and the value of the activity of such CSDs on the accounts with the banking CSDs. Furthermore, if settlement in foreign currencies is concentrated in one or two banking CSDs within the Union, this may lead to contagion risk. The prudential requirements laid down in the CSDR establish a sound prudential framework and address risks in relation to banking-type ancillary services. However, setting up measures to control risks when a banking CSD provides services to user CSDs may prove to be complex in a context where the participants of the user CSD, as well as the activity generating these risks and the evolution of those risks, are not under the direct control of that banking CSD. Therefore, the Union legislator may need to contemplate introducing a requirement for banking CSDs to develop a framework that elaborates on how risks stemming from the activity of the user CSDs can be contained. Overall, the ECB favours a balanced approach aimed at ensuring that the potential expansion of this activity by banking CSDs (and, therefore, also the increased risk exposures, as well as the concentration and potential contagion risk stemming from this expansion) is commensurate with the intended objective of facilitating settlement in foreign currencies by user CSDs, and does not put at risk the financial soundness of banking CSDs.

4.6.

Under the proposed regulation, banking CSDs could provide cash clearing and settlement services not only to their participants but also to participants of user CSDs. This could give rise to potential conflicts of interest whereby a banking CSD takes decisions or puts in place policies that favour its own participants or CSDs within the same group. This could be particularly relevant in a crisis situation, for example when unforeseen liquidity shortfalls or uncovered credit losses emerge. Therefore, the regulatory framework should include a requirement for CSDs to have in place clear rules and procedures addressing potential conflicts of interest and mitigating the risk of discriminatory treatment towards any user CSDs and their participants.

4.7.

The provision by banking CSDs of banking-type ancillary services to user CSDs would impact the risk profile of those banking CSDs and may also entail additional costs and operational complexity. Not all banking CSDs may be willing or able to increase their exposures to credit and liquidity risks and to allocate resources in order to allow for an expansion of the settlement activity in foreign currencies of user CSDs. The ECB understands that the provision of banking-type ancillary services to user CSDs remains a business decision of each banking CSD (in distinction to the establishment of links and open access to other CSDs, which should be ensured as a matter of course (12)).

4.8.

Moreover, in order to foster transparency in relation to the terms and conditions for the provision of banking-type ancillary services, any future regulatory technical standards should set out the disclosure requirements to which the banking CSDs should adhere as regards the minimum range of services offered, as well as the terms and conditions of such services and the costs and risks associated with them. This would avoid the possibility that CSDs within the same group as a banking CSD benefit from preferential treatment and, therefore, gain a competitive advantage over other user CSDs as regards settlement services in foreign currencies.

5. Netting

5.1.

The ECB welcomes the introduction by the proposed regulation of a requirement for banking CSDs to adequately monitor and manage any risks stemming from netting arrangements in relation to the cash leg of their applied settlement model (13). The ECB understands there are CSDs established in the Union that operate securities settlement systems in which cash and/or securities in relation to securities transactions are settled on a net basis. Such CSDs are not currently subject to specific requirements addressing the risks stemming from their netting arrangements.

5.2.

The risks associated with netting arrangements and the requirements that are intended to address those risks are reflected in several principles of the Principles for financial market infrastructures (PFMIs) issued by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems (CPSS) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) (14). It is noted that the requirement envisaged by the proposed regulation as referred to in paragraph 5.1 applies only to banking CSDs. However, it should apply to all CSDs operating securities settlement systems that use netting arrangements, irrespective of whether those CSDs provide banking-type ancillary services or not. Given the technical nature of the additional requirement applicable to such systems under the proposed regulation, this requirement could be further detailed in regulatory technical standards, to which the ECB stands ready to contribute.

6. Default

6.1.

It is beneficial to broaden the scope of the definition of default in the CSDR (15), which is currently confined to the opening of insolvency proceedings against a participant in a securities settlement system operated by a CSD (hereinafter the ‘CSD participant’). To that end, the definition could be aligned with the definition set out in the PFMIs (16) , (17), which refers to events specified in the CSD’s internal rules as constituting a default, including events related to a failure to complete a transfer of assets in accordance with the terms and rules of the concerned system.

6.2.

It is of crucial importance that when a CSD participant is not able to fulfil its obligations when they fall due, for whatever reason, the relevant CSD can promptly take action to contain losses and limit liquidity pressures. Therefore, the Union legislator may wish to reflect on a clarification to the effect that a CSD has the possibility to determine additional events that constitute a default by a CSD participant, where the default management rules and procedures referred to in the CSDR are not sufficient to address material events that may occur in a system.

Where the ECB recommends that the proposed regulation is amended, specific drafting proposals are set out in a separate technical working document accompanied by an explanatory text to this effect. The technical working document is available in English on EUR-Lex.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 28 July 2022.

The President of the ECB

Christine LAGARDE

(1) COM(2022) 120 final.

(2) Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories and amending Directives 98/26/EC and 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 (OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p.1).

(3) The reference is to the seminal work of the Financial Stability Board entitled ‘Reducing the moral hazard posed by systemically important financial institutions - FSB Recommendations and Time Lines’, 20 October 2010, available on the Financial Stability Board’s website at www.fsb.org

(4) See paragraph 4.1 of Opinion CON/2017/39. All ECB Opinions are published on EUR-Lex.

(5) See Article 2 of the proposed regulation.

(6) See Article 1(2)(b) of the proposed regulation.

(7) For example, CSDs deposit their long cash balances in accounts with central banks, organise the funding and defunding of their settlement activity through transfers via accounts with payment systems operated by central banks, and have recourse to central bank credit facilities as a key source of qualifying liquid resources.

(8) See Article 1(9) of the proposed regulation.

(9) Article 19(5) of the CSDR provides for special treatment of such interoperable links.

(10) See recital 25 of the proposed regulation.

(11) For instance, intraday/overnight deposits of user CSDs’ participants in accounts with a banking CSD need to be reinvested, which gives rise to risk exposures. Extension of intraday credit could result in credit and liquidity risk in case one or more participants of non-banking CSDs do not reimburse the amounts when due. Credit lines provided in several currencies by the banking CSD would also represent a source of market, credit and liquidity risks. Payments of coupons or redemptions of securities issued via/held through the user CSD also generate intraday or overnight risk exposures for the banking CSD.

(12) See Chapter III, Section 2 of the CSDR on access between CSDs.

(13) See Article 1(19)(a)(iii) of the proposed regulation.

(14) See CPSS-IOSCO Principles for financial market infrastructures available on the BIS website at www.bis.org.

(15) See Article 2(26) of the CSDR.

(16) According to Annex H of the PFMIs: ‘default – An event stipulated in an agreement as constituting a default. Generally, such events relate to a failure to complete a transfer of funds or securities in accordance with the terms and rules of the system in question.’

(17) In this context, it is noted that recital 6 of the CSDR underlines the importance of ensuring consistency between the CSDR-related legislation and international standards.

26.9.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/11

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 October 2022

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 (1) )

(2022/C 367/05)

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6.). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basispoints has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basispoints to the base rate.

Modified rates are indicated in bold.

Previous table published in OJ C 306, 11.8.2022, p. 20.

From	To	AT	BE	BG	CY	CZ	DE	DK	EE	EL	ES	FI	FR	HR	HU	IE	IT	LT	LU	LV	MT	NL	PL	PT	RO	SE	SI	SK	UK
1.10.2022	…	1,03	1,03	0,00	1,03	6,95	1,03	1,45	1,03	1,03	1,03	1,03	1,03	0,26	11,15	1,03	1,03	1,03	1,03	1,03	1,03	1,03	7,17	1,03	6,58	1,55	1,03	1,03	1,76
1.9.2022	30.9.2022	0,71	0,71	0,00	0,71	6,95	0,71	1,12	0,71	0,71	0,71	0,71	0,71	0,26	9,23	0,71	0,71	0,71	0,71	0,71	0,71	0,71	7,17	0,71	6,58	1,22	0,71	0,71	1,52
1.8.2022	31.8.2022	0,38	0,38	0,00	0,38	5,73	0,38	0,81	0,38	0,38	0,38	0,38	0,38	0,26	7,67	0,38	0,38	0,38	0,38	0,38	0,38	0,38	5,81	0,38	5,10	0,82	0,38	0,38	1,19
1.7.2022	31.7.2022	0,02	0,02	0,00	0,02	5,73	0,02	0,44	0,02	0,02	0,02	0,02	0,02	0,26	6,24	0,02	0,02	0,02	0,02	0,02	0,02	0,02	5,81	0,02	5,10	0,50	0,02	0,02	1,19
1.6.2022	30.6.2022	-0,19	-0,19	0,00	-0,19	4,85	-0,19	0,24	-0,19	-0,19	-0,19	-0,19	-0,19	0,26	6,24	-0,19	-0,19	-0,19	-0,19	-0,19	-0,19	-0,19	4,88	-0,19	4,40	0,22	-0,19	-0,19	1,02
1.5.2022	31.5.2022	-0,35	-0,35	0,00	-0,35	4,85	-0,35	0,08	-0,35	-0,35	-0,35	-0,35	-0,35	0,26	5,40	-0,35	-0,35	-0,35	-0,35	-0,35	-0,35	-0,35	4,06	-0,35	3,38	0,08	-0,35	-0,35	0,86
1.4.2022	30.4.2022	-0,49	-0,49	0,00	-0,49	4,00	-0,49	0,00	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	0,26	4,66	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	3,42	-0,49	3,38	-0,01	-0,49	-0,49	0,66
1.3.2022	31.3.2022	-0,49	-0,49	0,00	-0,49	4,00	-0,49	-0,03	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	0,26	4,02	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	2,85	-0,49	2,74	-0,04	-0,49	-0,49	0,66
1.2.2022	28.2.2022	-0,49	-0,49	0,00	-0,49	3,29	-0,49	-0,03	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	0,26	3,17	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	2,04	-0,49	2,74	-0,05	-0,49	-0,49	0,66
1.1.2022	31.1.2022	-0,49	-0,49	0,00	-0,49	2,49	-0,49	-0,01	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	0,26	2,38	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	-0,49	1,21	-0,49	2,27	-0,03	-0,49	-0,49	0,51

(1) OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

26.9.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/19

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

(2022/C 367/10)

This communication is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1).

COMMUNICATING THE APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT

‘Alsace grand cru Schoenenbourg’

PDO-FR-A0418-AM02

Date of communication: 20 July 2022

DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT

1. Additional indication

In Chapter I, Section II(1), of the specification, the following common forms of the names of grape varieties have been added: ‘Sylvaner’ and ‘Pinot Noir’, with the corresponding official names, respectively: Sylvaner B and Pinot Noir N.

The common form ‘Sylvaner’ has been added to correct an oversight in the original version of the specification. The original version stated in Chapter I, Section X(1)(b), that the authorised varieties ‘can be made into wine and placed on the market under their respective common names’. However, the corresponding common form of the name was not included in the list of permitted common names. Prior to the approval of the original version of the specification, a national decision meant that Sylvaner B had been added to the varieties authorised for the production of wines with the designation of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Zotzenberg’. This took into account local custom and the reputation of these wines.

The common name ‘Pinot Noir’ has been added to the specification. This is because of an application submitted at national level for recognition of the still red wines of certain ‘Alsace grand cru’ designations of origin. This application for the recognition of a red wine is based on long-standing practice, reputation and the characteristics of the wines produced with grapes of the variety Pinot Noir N grown on demarcated parcels of these ‘Alsace grand cru’ designations. Pinot Noir N is the only variety authorised for these red wines.

Chapter I, Section II(1), of the specification concerns the varieties of Muscat à petits grains, commonly referred to as ‘Muscat’. The words ‘blancs’ and ‘roses’ have been added to the names of these varieties, in order to correct an oversight in the previous version of the specification.

These amendments do not require any amendments to the single document.

2. Types of product

In Chapter I, Section III, of the specification, the text has been amended to show that the protected designations of origin covered by the current specification no longer refer exclusively to still white wines.

The ‘Alsace grand cru’ protected designations of origin which cover red and white still wines are mentioned by name: ‘Alsace grand cru Hengst’ and ‘Alsace grand cru Kirchberg de Barr’.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

3. Geographical area

In Chapter I, Section IV(1), of the specification, a paragraph has been added giving the dates on which the geographical area was approved by the relevant INAO (National Institute for Origin and Quality) committee. The new paragraph also refers to the 2021 Official Geographic Code as the source for the demarcation of the area boundary as it appears in the specification. Reference to the source gives legal certainty to the demarcation of the area.

As a result of the reference to the 2021 Official Geographic Code, the list of names of municipalities has been updated. The municipalities of Kientzheim and Sigolsheim have been abolished. Their territory is now part of the municipality of Kaysersberg Vignoble.

These editorial changes do not affect the boundary of the geographical area.

The following sentences have also been added to Section IV(1):

‘Maps of the geographical area can be accessed on the INAO website.

A map defining the boundaries of the geographical area has been lodged with the municipal authorities in the case of the partially included municipality.’

These amendments require the amendment of point 6 of the single document.

4. Demarcated parcel area

In Chapter I, Section IV(2), of the specification:

—	in order to correct an oversight, the words ‘6 and 7 September 2006’ have been added to the first paragraph. This is a date on which the parcel area was approved by the relevant national committee;

—	in the second paragraph, the wording has been amended to take into account the changes made to the names of municipalities in Section IV(1);

—	the ‘Municipalities’ column in the table has been updated to correspond to the names of municipalities mentioned in Section IV(1).

These amendments do not affect the single document.

5. Area in immediate proximity

In Chapter I, Section IV(3), of the specification, a paragraph has been amended to give the 2021 Official Geographic Code as the source for the demarcation of the area boundary as it appears in the specification. Reference to the source gives legal certainty to the demarcation of the area.

As a result of the reference to the 2021 Official Geographic Code, the list of names of municipalities has been updated. The name of the municipality of Kaysersberg has been deleted and that of Kaysersberg Vignoble added, together with the information that the only part of this municipality included is that belonging to the delegated municipality of Kaysersberg.

These editorial changes do not affect the boundary of the area in immediate proximity.

These amendments require the amendment of point 9 of the single document.

6. Vine varieties

In Chapter I, Section V(1)(a), of the specification, two phrases have been added: ‘— for white wines:’ and ‘— for red wines: from grape variety Pinot Noir N’. This is because an application for recognition of the still red wines was submitted at national level for certain ‘Alsace grand cru’ designations of origin. Pinot Noir N is the only variety authorised for these red wines. It is also the only variety authorised for the production of red wine in the ‘Alsace’ designation of origin.

In Sections V(1)(a), (b) and (e) and V(2)(b), the words ‘blancs’ and ‘roses’ have been added to the names of the different varieties of Muscat à petits grains. This corrects an oversight in the previous version of the specification.

The single document has not been changed on account of these amendments.

7. Planting density

In Chapter I, Section VI(1)(a), of the specification, the following phrases have been added: ‘For white wine production’ and ‘For red wine production’. This is to distinguish between the minimum planting densities according to the colour of the wines. These densities are stated for the designations authorised to produce red wines.

The single document has not been changed on account of these additions.

In Chapter I, Section VI(1)(a), of the specification, the date of ‘25 October 2011’ has been specified for the effective application of the rule regarding the possibility of the density changing due to grubbing-up. It replaces the wording ‘on the date on which this specification was approved’.

This amendment requires the amendment of point 5 of the single document.

8. Pruning rule

In Chapter I, Section VI(1)(b), of the specification, the previous rule for white wines regarding the number of buds per square metre of soil differed according to the grape varieties. This rule has been abolished and replaced by a single rule of 18 buds per plant.

This development makes it possible to harmonise the wording in the specifications of the Alsace designations of origin, and to simplify the methods of checking.

Point 5 of the single document has been amended.

The words ‘For white wines’ have been added at the start of the sentence. This is due to the application for recognition for still red wines submitted at national level for some ‘Alsace grand cru’ designations of origin.

A pruning rule has been added for red wines, setting the maximum number of buds per plant at 14. This is less than the number authorised for white wine production. This rule makes it possible to comply with the rules on yields and to produce good-quality grapes.

The above amendments do not affect the single document.

9. Rules on trellising and foliage height

In Chapter I, Section VI(1)(c), of the specification, the maximum height of the wires supporting the arched canes has been deleted, and the method of measuring the height of trellised foliage has been changed.

These amendments make it possible to verify that the foliage height is compliant as the plants grow. Previously this was possible only through a requirement relating to the support.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

10. Average maximum crop load per parcel

In Chapter I, Section VI(1)(d), of the specification, the average maximum crop load per parcel for white wines has been reduced from 10 000 to 8 500 kilograms per hectare, reflecting the reduced yields for these wines.

An average maximum crop load per parcel has been established for red wines. It is less than that for white wine, reflecting the yields for red wines.

These amendments do not affect the single document.

11. Ripeness of grapes and minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume

In Chapter I, Section VII(2)(a), of the specification, the table has been amended. It now takes into account the application for recognition of still red wines submitted at national level for some ‘Alsace grand cru’ designations of origin.

For these ‘Alsace grand cru’ designations for red wines, minimum levels have been established for the sugar content of the different grape varieties when harvested, and for their minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume.

These amendments do not affect the single document.

For white wines, the minimum levels for the sugar content of the grapes have been increased by 2 or 3 grams per litre of must in order to respect the same 1 % variation with the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume for each grape variety, as in the previous version of the specification. The protection and management body has chosen to calculate the transformation of grams of sugar into alcohol on the basis of 17 grams of sugar producing 1 % alcohol by volume for white wines. The original version of the specification had used the figure of 16,83 grams. The amount of 17 grams had been recommended by the competent national committee of the INAO when the original version of the specifications was established.

These amendments do not affect the single document.

12. Yields

In Chapter I, Section VIII(1) and (2), of the specification, the yields and upper yield limits have been reduced for white wines and white wines labelled ‘Vendanges Tardives’ [Late Harvest], in accordance with the hierarchy of designations in the Alsace region. This amendment will allow better quality control.

Point 5 of the single document has been amended for the maximum yields (upper yield limits).

The words ‘Vins blancs’ have been added for wines without a description. This is due to an application submitted at national level for recognition of still red wines for some ‘Alsace grand cru’ designations of origin.

The yield and upper yield limit for red wines have been established in accordance with the hierarchy of designations of the Alsace regions, meaning that the amounts are lower for these ‘grand cru’ designations.

The latter amendments do not affect the single document.

13. Malolactic fermentation, fermentable sugar content for red wines

Chapter I, Section IX(1)(c), of the specification lays down that malolactic fermentation is carried out for red wines.

For the purpose of checking compliance with this rule, the maximum malic acid content has been established as 0,4 grams per litre at the time of packaging.

Section IX(1)(d) lays down a maximum content for fermentable sugars (glucose and fructose) of 2 grams per litre after fermentation.

The single document has not been amended.

14. Increasing the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume prohibited for red wines

Chapter I, Section IX(1)(e), of the specification lays down that red wines must not be enriched in any way. This restriction applies to the production process. It is consistent with demarcation of parcels for grape-growing, minimum planting density, pruning rules and restricted yields.

The single document has not been amended.

15. Capacity of the winery

In Chapter I, Section IX(1)(g), of the specification, the coefficient for calculating the capacity of the winery has been reduced.

The capacity of the winery does not need to be as large in proportion to the volume of the preceding harvest.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

16. Date of maturing and placing on the market for consumers in the case of red wines

In Chapter I, Section IX(2), of the specification, a minimum maturation period has been established for red wines: until 1 October of the year following the harvest. Wines made with grapes of the variety Pinot Noir N from these vineyards need a minimum period in order to fully express their characteristics.

In Chapter I, Section IX(5)(a), it is stated that, following the maturation period, red wines cannot be placed on the market for consumers until 1 October of the year following the harvest.

These amendments do not require any amendments to the single document.

17. Checks on packaged batches

In Chapter I, Section IX(3)(b), of the specification, the rule has been abolished that required sample bottles to be kept for checks on packaged batches.

This rule is a measure of verifiability. It is now part of the checking plan.

The single document is not affected by this amendment.

18. Storing packaged wines

In Chapter I, Section IX(4), of the specification, further details have been provided of the characteristics of the place where packaged wines are stored.

This helps operators to comply with this rule, and makes checking easier.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

19. Human factors contributing to the link with the geographical area

In Chapter I, Section X(1)(b), of the specification, the text has been amended to take account of the fact that still red wines have been approved for the designations of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Hengst’ and ‘Alsace grand cru Kirchberg de Barr’.

—

The following information has been added for the protected designation of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Hengst’: red wines approved in 2022; Pinot Noir N is the only variety authorised; the minimum planting density is 5 500 plants per hectare for the production of red wine; enrichment is not permitted in any form; there must be a minimum maturing period of 10 months.

—

The following information has been added for the protected designation of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Kirchberg de Barr’: red wines approved in 2022; Pinot Noir N is the only variety authorised; the minimum planting density is 5 000 plants per hectare for the production of red wine; enrichment is not permitted in any form; there must be a minimum maturing period of 10 months.

In Section X(1)(b), information to the effect that these two designations of origin were recognised for white wines has been deleted. The words ‘for white wines’ have been added where necessary for understanding the text.

The single document has not been changed on account of these amendments.

The words ‘blancs’ and ‘roses’ have been added to the names of the different varieties of Muscat à petits grains. This corrects an oversight in the previous version of the specification. These additions do not affect the single document.

20. Description of the wine(s):

In Chapter I, Section X(2), of the specification, details have been added of the visual appearance of the white wines in order to characterise them more fully.

In the case of the first two types of wine described: ‘The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to golden yellow.’

Details of the last two types of wine: ‘The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to amber yellow.’

Point 4 of the single document has been amended.

A description of the main organoleptic characteristics of the red wines has been added for the designations of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Hengst’ and ‘Alsace grand cru Kirchberg de Barr’.

These descriptions do not affect the single document.

21. Link with the geographical area

In Chapter I, Section X(3), of the specification, for the designation of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Hengst’, there are details about the link between the geographical origin and the characteristics of the wines which could also apply to the red wines of this designation. These details have been supplemented by information specific to the red wines.

The single document has not been amended.

22. Transitional measures

In Chapter I, Section XI(2), of the specification, in accordance with the amendments to Chapter I, Section VI, the maximum height of the wires supporting the arched canes has been deleted and the maximum number of buds per plant has been reduced.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

23. Requirement to state the sugar content on labelling and other formats giving information for white wines

Under the previous specification, mention of the sugar content was optional. Chapter I, Section XII(2)(d), of the specification has been replaced by a new text making it obligatory to mention the sugar content as laid down in Regulation (EU) 2019/33.

This information makes it easier for consumers to understand the type of wine.

The new rule does not apply to wines bearing the traditional terms ‘Vendanges Tardives’ and ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ [includes botrytised grapes].

Point 9 of the single document has been supplemented.

The original point (d) of Section XII(2) is now point (e).

This amendment does not affect the single document.

24. Advance declaration of the assignment of parcels

In Chapter II, Section I(1), of the specification, a clarification has been added to the rules regarding the advance declaration of the assignment of parcels. Such declarations are submitted by operators to the protection and management body for the ‘Alsace grand cru’ designations of origin when they cease production under the designation.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

SINGLE DOCUMENT

1. Name(s)

Alsace grand cru Schoenenbourg

2. Geographical indication type

PDO – Protected designation of origin

3. Categories of grapevine products

Wine

4. Description of the wine(s)

BRIEF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION

The wines are still and white.

The minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume of the wines is 12,5 % for Gewürztraminer Rs and Pinot Gris G, and 11 % for other varieties. After enrichment, the total alcoholic strength by volume of the wines does not exceed 15 % for wines made from the varieties Gewürztraminer B and Pinot Gris G, and 14 % for wines made from other varieties.

The other analytical characteristics are as laid down by EU legislation.

Excellent examples of white wines suitable for ageing, they are characterised by powerful freshness underpinned by dominant tartaric acid combined with beautifully ripened grapes. The name of the designation may be supplemented by the common names of the grape varieties, on condition that the wines are made exclusively from grape varieties that can be referred to using the names in question. These are wines of great substance and complexity, with powerful aromas and numerous subtleties. Very long in the mouth, they become more complex over time.

There are two types: — dry wines with minerality; — aromatic wines that are fruity, unctuous and rich. The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to golden yellow.

General analytical characteristics
Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum total acidity	in milliequivalents per litre
Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre)
Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

2. Designation followed by the words ‘Vendanges Tardives’

BRIEF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION

The minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume of the wines is 16 % for Gewürztraminer Rs and Pinot Gris G, and 14,5 % for the other varieties.

The other analytical characteristics are as laid down by EU legislation.

Wines with the description ‘Vendanges Tardives’ often have very exotic aromas, of candied fruits with a fresh finish. They are remarkably concentrated with long-lasting aromas. The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to amber yellow.

General analytical characteristics
Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum total acidity	in milliequivalents per litre
Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre)
Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

3. Designation followed by the words ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’

BRIEF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION

The minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume of the wines is 18,2 % for Gewürztraminer Rs and Pinot Gris G, and 16,4 % for other varieties.

The other analytical characteristics are as laid down by EU legislation.

Wines entitled to be labelled ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ are more concentrated, powerful wines, often with aromas of candied fruits. They are remarkably concentrated with long-lasting aromas. The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to amber yellow.

General analytical characteristics
Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum total acidity	in milliequivalents per litre
Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre)
Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

5. Wine-making practices

5.1. Specific oenological practices

1. Training systems: planting density

Cultivation method

The minimum vine planting density is 4 500 plants per hectare.

The distance between the rows of vines must not exceed 2 metres.

Vines have an in-the-row spacing of no less than 0,75 metres and no more than 1,50 metres.

As of 25 October 2011, grubbing-up of rows within a parcel must not result in spacing wider than 3 metres between the rows.

2. Training systems: pruning rule

Cultivation method

The vines are pruned to single or double Guyot with a maximum of 18 buds per plant.

3. Harvest

Cultivation method

The wines are made from grapes harvested manually.

4. Increase in the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume

Specific oenological practice

Any increase in the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume must not exceed:

0,5 % for wines made from the varieties Gewürztraminer B and Pinot Gris G,

1, 5 % for wines made from other varieties.

Wines eligible for the term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ must not be enriched.

5. Production

Wine-making restriction

Use of wood chips is prohibited.

6. Maturing the wines

Specific oenological practice

The wines must be matured until at least 1 June of the year following the harvest.

Wines eligible for the term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ must be matured until at least 1 June of the second year following the harvest.

5.2. Maximum yields

1.	Yield – Designation with or without the additional term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ 60 hectolitres per hectare

2.	Yield – Designation followed by the term ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ 48 hectolitres per hectare

6. Demarcated geographical area

The grapes are harvested and the wines are produced, developed and matured in the following municipalities, based on the 2021 Official Geographic Code:

—

Department of Haut-Rhin: Entire municipalities: Ammerschwihr, Beblenheim, Bennwihr, Bergheim, Bergholtz, Eguisheim, Gueberschwihr, Guebwiller, Hattstatt, Hunawihr, Ingersheim, Katzenthal, Mittelwihr, Niedermorschwihr, Orschwihr, Pfaffenheim, Ribeauvillé, Riquewihr, Rodern, Rouffach, Saint-Hippolyte, Soultzmatt, Thann, Turckheim, Vieux-Thann, Voegtlinshoffen, Westhalten, Wettolsheim, Wintzenheim, Wuenheim and Zellenberg.

Municipalities partially included: Kaysersberg Vignoble, only the territory of the delegated municipalities of Kientzheim and Sigolsheim.

—	Department of Bas-Rhin: Andlau, Barr, Bergbieten, Blienschwiller, Dahlenheim, Dambach-la-Ville, Eichhoffen, Kintzheim, Marlenheim, Mittelbergheim, Molsheim, Nothalten, Scharrachbergheim-Irmstett and Wolxheim.

A map defining the boundaries of the geographical area has been lodged with the municipal authorities of the partially included municipalities.

Maps of the geographical area can be accessed on the INAO website.

7. Wine grape variety(-ies)

Gewürztraminer Rs

Muscat Ottonel B – Muscat, Moscato

Muscat à petits grains blancs B – Muscat, Moscato

Muscat à petits grains roses Rs – Muscat, Moscato

Pinot Gris G

Riesling B

8. Description of the link(s)

Thanks to the favourable climate conditions characteristic of the vineyards of Alsace, the protected designation of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Schoenenbourg’ benefits from one of the best locations. Nestling in the picturesque countryside of Alsace, the vineyards enable the production of highly expressive wines, with distinctive character and unique personality.

The deep marly soil produces opulent, full-bodied, deep and complex wines, with great restraint when young. They have a particularly remarkable and very original acid structure, characterised by gypsum and a great bitterness.

The excellent climate conditions at the end of the season are favourable to concentration on the vine and to the development of the noble rot. As a result, it is possible to produce wines from grapes harvested when overripe.

The maturation period laid down in the specification allows the wines to improve.

There are strict rules relating to production, such as maintaining a broad canopy and harvesting by hand. By adopting these rules, the winegrowers of Alsace preserve the established character of the wines, which are known for their complexity and their suitability for long keeping.

They are the top of the range for this region. These wines are more prestigious than wines with the protected designation of origin ‘Alsace’.

9. Essential further conditions (packaging, labelling, other requirements)

Area in immediate proximity

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Derogation concerning production in the demarcated geographical area

Description of the condition

The area in the immediate vicinity, defined by derogation for winemaking, processing and maturing, comprises the territory of the following municipalities, based on the 2021 Official Geographic Code:

—

Department of Haut-Rhin: Entire municipalities: Bergholtz-Zell, Berrwiller, Buhl, Cernay, Colmar, Gundolsheim, Hartmanswiller, Herrlisheim, Houssen, Husseren-les-Châteaux, Jungholtz, Leimbach, Obermorschwihr, Osenbach, Ostheim, Rorschwihr, Soultz, Steinbach, Uffholtz, Walbach, Wattwiller, Wihr-au-Val and Zimmerbach.

Municipalities partially included: Kaysersberg Vignoble, only the territory of the delegated municipality of Kaysersberg.

—

Department of Bas-Rhin: Albé, Avolsheim, Balbronn, Bernardswiller, Bernardvillé, Bischoffsheim, Boersch, Bourgheim, Châtenois, Cleebourg, Dachstein, Dangolsheim, Dieffenthal, Dorlisheim, Epfig, Ergersheim, Ernolsheim-Bruche, Fessenheim-le-Bas, Flexbourg, Furdenheim, Gertwiller, Gimbrett-Berstett, Goxwiller, Heiligenstein, Itterswiller, Kienheim, Kirchheim, Kuttolsheim, Mittelhausen, Mutzig, Nordheim, Oberhoffen-les-Wissenbourg, Obernai, Odratzheim, Orschwiller, Osthoffen, Ottrott, Petersbach, Reichsfeld, Riedseltz, Rosenwiller, Rosheim, Rott, Saint-Nabor, Saint-Pierre, Scherwiller, Seebach, Soultz-les-Bains, Steinseltz, Stotzheim, Strasbourg, Traenheim, Villé, Wangen, Westhoffen, Wissembourg and Zellwiller.

Packaging in the area

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Packaging in the demarcated geographical area

Description of the condition

The wines are packaged in ‘Vin du Rhin’ bottles, in accordance with Decree No 55-673 of 20 May 1955, the Order of 13 May 1959 and the Decree of 19 March 1963. No other type of bottle is permitted.

Since the Law of 5 July 1972, the wines must be bottled in the departments of Bas-Rhin and Haut-Rhin in tall, thin ‘Vin du Rhin’ bottles, as laid down in the Decree of 1955.

Stating the vintage

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

The vintage must appear, together with the name of the designation, in any harvest and stock declarations, supporting documents or publicity and on any leaflets, labels, invoices or containers.

Common name

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

The name of the protected designation of origin may be supplemented by one of the common names of the grape varieties, on condition that the wines are made exclusively from grape varieties that can be referred to using the names in question.

Use of two or more common names on the same label is prohibited.

The common names are as follows:

Gewürztraminer

Muscat

Muscat Ottonel

Pinot Gris

Riesling.

Traditional terms ‘Vendanges Tardives’ and ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

For wines eligible for the term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’, the following must also be stated:

—

Vintage

—	one of the common forms of the grape variety name.

Indication of the sugar content

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

The sugar content, as defined by European law, must be clearly stated in the case of white wines for which one of the 51 protected designations of origin ‘Alsace Grand Cru – lieu-dit’ is claimed under the terms of this specification. This applies when such wines are presented under the aforementioned designation and made available to the public, dispatched, offered for sale or sold, which cannot happen unless the sugar content is stated in any publicity and on any leaflets, labels, invoices or containers. It does not apply to wines labelled ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’.

Link to the product specification

https://info.agriculture.gouv.fr/gedei/site/bo-agri/document_administratif-4cec3ff9-abd4-4253-a1db-245ddd809faa

(1) OJ L 9, 11.1.2019, p. 2.

26.9.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/31

(2022/C 367/11)

This communication is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1).

COMMUNICATING THE APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT

‘Alsace grand cru Saering’

PDO-FR-A0375-AM02

Date of communication: 20 July 2022

DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT

1. Additional indication

These amendments do not require any amendments to the single document.

2. Types of product

The ‘Alsace grand cru’ protected designations of origin which cover red and white still wines are mentioned by name: ‘Alsace grand cru Hengst’ and ‘Alsace grand cru Kirchberg de Barr’.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

3. Geographical area

These editorial changes do not affect the boundary of the geographical area.

The following sentences have also been added to Section IV(1):

‘Maps of the geographical area can be accessed on the INAO website.

A map defining the boundaries of the geographical area has been lodged with the municipal authorities in the case of the partially included municipality.’

These amendments require the amendment of point 6 of the single document.

4. Demarcated parcel area

In Chapter I, Section IV(2), of the specification:

—	in order to correct an oversight, the words ‘6 and 7 September 2006’ have been added to the first paragraph. This is a date on which the parcel area was approved by the relevant national committee;

—	in the second paragraph, the wording has been amended to take into account the changes made to the names of municipalities in Section IV(1);

—	the ‘Municipalities’ column in the table has been updated to correspond to the names of municipalities mentioned in Section IV(1).

These amendments do not affect the single document.

5. Area in immediate proximity

These editorial changes do not affect the boundary of the area in immediate proximity.

These amendments require the amendment of point 9 of the single document.

6. Vine varieties

The single document has not been changed on account of these amendments.

7. Planting density

The single document has not been changed on account of these additions.

This amendment requires the amendment of point 5 of the single document.

8. Pruning rule

This development makes it possible to harmonise the wording in the specifications of the Alsace designations of origin, and to simplify the methods of checking.

Point 5 of the single document has been amended.

The above amendments do not affect the single document.

9. Rules on trellising and foliage height

These amendments make it possible to verify that the foliage height is compliant as the plants grow. Previously this was possible only through a requirement relating to the support.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

10. Average maximum crop load per parcel

An average maximum crop load per parcel has been established for red wines. It is less than that for white wine, reflecting the yields for red wines.

These amendments do not affect the single document.

11. Ripeness of grapes and minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume

These amendments do not affect the single document.

12. Yields

Point 5 of the single document has been amended for the maximum yields (upper yield limits).

The latter amendments do not affect the single document.

13. Malolactic fermentation, fermentable sugar content for red wines

Chapter I, Section IX(1)(c), of the specification lays down that malolactic fermentation is carried out for red wines.

For the purpose of checking compliance with this rule, the maximum malic acid content has been established as 0,4 grams per litre at the time of packaging.

Section IX(1)(d) lays down a maximum content for fermentable sugars (glucose and fructose) of 2 grams per litre after fermentation.

The single document has not been amended.

14. Increasing the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume prohibited for red wines

The single document has not been amended.

15. Capacity of the winery

In Chapter I, Section IX(1)(g), of the specification, the coefficient for calculating the capacity of the winery has been reduced.

The capacity of the winery does not need to be as large in proportion to the volume of the preceding harvest.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

16. Date of maturing and placing on the market for consumers in the case of red wines

In Chapter I, Section IX(5)(a), it is stated that, following the maturation period, red wines cannot be placed on the market for consumers until 1 October of the year following the harvest.

These amendments do not require any amendments to the single document.

17. Checks on packaged batches

In Chapter I, Section IX(3)(b), of the specification, the rule has been abolished that required sample bottles to be kept for checks on packaged batches.

This rule is a measure of verifiability. It is now part of the checking plan.

The single document is not affected by this amendment.

18. Storing packaged wines

In Chapter I, Section IX(4), of the specification, further details have been provided of the characteristics of the place where packaged wines are stored.

This helps operators to comply with this rule, and makes checking easier.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

19. Human factors contributing to the link with the geographical area

—

The single document has not been changed on account of these amendments.

20. Description of the wine(s):

In Chapter I, Section X(2), of the specification, details have been added of the visual appearance of the white wines in order to characterise them more fully.

In the case of the first two types of wine described: ‘The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to golden yellow.’

Details of the last two types of wine: ‘The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to amber yellow.’

Point 4 of the single document has been amended.

A description of the main organoleptic characteristics of the red wines has been added for the designations of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Hengst’ and ‘Alsace grand cru Kirchberg de Barr’.

These descriptions do not affect the single document.

21. Link with the geographical area

The single document has not been amended.

22. Transitional measures

This amendment does not affect the single document.

23. Requirement to state the sugar content on labelling and other formats giving information for white wines

This information makes it easier for consumers to understand the type of wine.

The new rule does not apply to wines bearing the traditional terms ‘Vendanges Tardives’ and ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ [includes botrytised grapes].

Point 9 of the single document has been supplemented.

The original point (d) of Section XII(2) is now point (e).

This amendment does not affect the single document.

24. Advance declaration of the assignment of parcels

This amendment does not affect the single document.

SINGLE DOCUMENT

1. Name(s)

Alsace grand cru Saering

2. Geographical indication type

PDO – Protected designation of origin

3. Categories of grapevine products

Wine

4. Description of the wine(s)

BRIEF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION

The wines are still and white.

The other analytical characteristics are as laid down by EU legislation.

There are two types: — dry wines with minerality; — aromatic wines that are fruity, unctuous and rich. The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to golden yellow.

General analytical characteristics
Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum total acidity	in milliequivalents per litre
Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre)
Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

2. Designation followed by the words ‘Vendanges Tardives’

BRIEF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION

The minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume of the wines is 16 % for Gewürztraminer Rs and Pinot Gris G, and 14,5 % for the other varieties.

The other analytical characteristics are as laid down by EU legislation.

Wines with the description ‘Vendanges Tardives’ often have very exotic aromas, of candied fruits with a fresh finish. They are remarkably concentrated with long-lasting aromas. The colour of these wines is deep and intense and ranges to amber yellow.

General analytical characteristics
Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum total acidity	in milliequivalents per litre
Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre)
Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

3. Designation followed by the words ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’

BRIEF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION

The minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume of the wines is 18,2 % for Gewürztraminer Rs and Pinot Gris G, and 16,4 % for other varieties.

The other analytical characteristics are as laid down by EU legislation.

Wines entitled to be labelled ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ are more concentrated, powerful wines, often with aromas of candied fruits. They are remarkably concentrated with long-lasting aromas. The colour of these wines is deep and intense and ranges to amber yellow.

General analytical characteristics
Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum total acidity	in milliequivalents per litre
Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre)
Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

5. Wine-making practices

5.1. Specific oenological practices

1. Training systems: planting density

Cultivation method

The minimum vine planting density is 4 500 plants per hectare.

The distance between the rows of vines must not exceed 2 metres.

Vines have an in-the-row spacing of no less than 0,75 metres and no more than 1,50 metres.

As of 25 October 2011, grubbing-up of rows within a parcel must not result in spacing wider than 3 metres between the rows.

2. Training systems: pruning rule

Cultivation method

The vines are pruned to single or double Guyot with a maximum of 18 buds per plant.

3. Harvest

Cultivation method

The wines are made from grapes harvested manually.

4. Increase in the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume

Specific oenological practice

Any increase in the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume must not exceed:

0,5 % for wines made from the varieties Gewürztraminer B and Pinot Gris G,

1,5 % for wines made from other varieties.

Wines eligible for the term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ must not be enriched.

5. Production

Wine-making restriction

Use of wood chips is prohibited.

6. Maturing the wines

Specific oenological practice

The wines must be matured until at least 1 June of the year following the harvest.

Wines eligible for the term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ must be matured until at least 1 June of the second year following the harvest.

5.2. Maximum yields

1.	Yield – Designation with or without the additional term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ 60 hectolitres per hectare

2.	Yield – Designation followed by the term ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ 48 hectolitres per hectare

6. Demarcated geographical area

The grapes are harvested and the wines are produced, developed and matured in the following municipalities, based on the 2021 Official Geographic Code:

—

Municipalities partially included: Kaysersberg Vignoble, only the territory of the delegated municipalities of Kientzheim and Sigolsheim.

—

Department of Bas-Rhin: Andlau, Barr, Bergbieten, Blienschwiller, Dahlenheim, Dambach-la-Ville, Eichhoffen, Kintzheim, Marlenheim, Mittelbergheim, Molsheim, Nothalten, Scharrachbergheim-Irmstett and Wolxheim.

A map defining the boundaries of the geographical area has been lodged with the municipal authorities of the partially included municipalities.

Maps of the geographical area can be accessed on the INAO website.

7. Wine grape variety(-ies)

Gewürztraminer Rs

Muscat Ottonel B – Muscat, Moscato

Muscat à petits grains blancs B – Muscat, Moscato

Muscat à petits grains roses Rs – Muscat, Moscato

Pinot Gris G

Riesling B

8. Description of the link(s)

Thanks to the favourable climate conditions characteristic of the vineyards of Alsace, the protected designation of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Saering’ benefits from one of the best locations. Nestling in the picturesque countryside of Alsace, the vineyards enable the production of highly expressive wines, with distinctive character and unique personality.

The stony texture and sandstone explain the pronounced salinity of the wines. The presence of limestone provides more creeping acidity, guaranteeing the longevity of the wines.

The maturation period laid down in the specification allows the wines to improve.

They are the top of the range for this region. These wines are more prestigious than wines with the protected designation of origin ‘Alsace’.

The work by Médard Barth entitled Der Rebbau des Elsass und die Absatzgebieten seiner Weine, written in 1958, spoke highly of this lieu-dit, which today is famous.

9. Essential further conditions (packaging, labelling, other requirements)

Area in immediate proximity

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Derogation concerning production in the demarcated geographical area

Description of the condition

The area in the immediate vicinity, defined by derogation for winemaking, processing and maturing, comprises the territory of the following municipalities, based on the 2021 Official Geographic Code:

—

Municipalities partially included: Kaysersberg Vignoble, only the territory of the delegated municipality of Kaysersberg.

—

Packaging in the area

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Packaging in the demarcated geographical area

Description of the condition

Since the Law of 5 July 1972, the wines must be bottled in the departments of Bas-Rhin and Haut-Rhin in tall, thin ‘Vin du Rhin’ bottles, as laid down in the Decree of 1955.

Stating the vintage

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

The vintage must appear, together with the name of the designation, in any harvest and stock declarations, supporting documents or publicity and on any leaflets, labels, invoices or containers.

Common name

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

Use of two or more common names on the same label is prohibited.

The common names are as follows:

Gewürztraminer

Muscat

Muscat Ottonel

Pinot Gris

Riesling.

Traditional terms ‘Vendanges Tardives’ and ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

For wines eligible for the term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’, the following must also be stated:

—

vintage

—	one of the common forms of the grape variety name.

Indication of the sugar content

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

Link to the product specification

https://info.agriculture.gouv.fr/gedei/site/bo-agri/document_administratif-4cec3ff9-abd4-4253-a1db-245ddd809faa

(1) OJ L 9, 11.1.2019, p. 2.

26.9.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/42

(2022/C 367/12)

This communication is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1).

COMMUNICATING THE APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT

‘Alsace grand cru Winzenberg’

PDO-FR-A0641-AM02

Date of communication: 20 July 2022

DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT

1. Additional indication

These amendments do not require any amendments to the single document.

2. Types of product

The ‘Alsace grand cru’ protected designations of origin which cover red and white still wines are mentioned by name: ‘Alsace grand cru Hengst’ and ‘Alsace grand cru Kirchberg de Barr’.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

3. Geographical area

These editorial changes do not affect the boundary of the geographical area.

The following sentences have also been added to Section IV(1):

‘Maps of the geographical area can be accessed on the INAO website.

A map defining the boundaries of the geographical area has been lodged with the municipal authorities in the case of the partially included municipality.’

These amendments require the amendment of point 6 of the single document.

4. Demarcated parcel area

In Chapter I, Section IV(2), of the specification:

—	in order to correct an oversight, the words ‘6 and 7 September 2006’ have been added to the first paragraph. This is a date on which the parcel area was approved by the relevant national committee;

—	in the second paragraph, the wording has been amended to take into account the changes made to the names of municipalities in Section IV(1);

—	the ‘Municipalities’ column in the table has been updated to correspond to the names of municipalities mentioned in Section IV(1).

These amendments do not affect the single document.

5. Area in immediate proximity

These editorial changes do not affect the boundary of the area in immediate proximity.

These amendments require the amendment of point 9 of the single document.

6. Vine varieties

The single document has not been changed on account of these amendments.

7. Planting density

The single document has not been changed on account of these additions.

This amendment requires the amendment of point 5 of the single document.

8. Pruning rule

This development makes it possible to harmonise the wording in the specifications of the Alsace designations of origin, and to simplify the methods of checking.

Point 5 of the single document has been amended.

The above amendments do not affect the single document.

9. Rules on trellising and foliage height

These amendments make it possible to verify that the foliage height is compliant as the plants grow. Previously this was possible only through a requirement relating to the support.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

10. Average maximum crop load per parcel

An average maximum crop load per parcel has been established for red wines. It is less than that for white wine, reflecting the yields for red wines.

These amendments do not affect the single document.

11. Ripeness of grapes and minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume

These amendments do not affect the single document.

12. Yields

Point 5 of the single document has been amended for the maximum yields (upper yield limits).

The latter amendments do not affect the single document.

13. Malolactic fermentation, fermentable sugar content for red wines

Chapter I, Section IX(1)(c), of the specification lays down that malolactic fermentation is carried out for red wines.

For the purpose of checking compliance with this rule, the maximum malic acid content has been established as 0.4 grams per litre at the time of packaging.

Section IX(1)(d) lays down a maximum content for fermentable sugars (glucose and fructose) of 2 grams per litre after fermentation.

The single document has not been amended.

14. Increasing the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume prohibited for red wines

The single document has not been amended.

15. Capacity of the winery

In Chapter I, Section IX(1)(g), of the specification, the coefficient for calculating the capacity of the winery has been reduced.

The capacity of the winery does not need to be as large in proportion to the volume of the preceding harvest.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

16. Date of maturing and placing on the market for consumers in the case of red wines

In Chapter I, Section IX(5)(a), it is stated that, following the maturation period, red wines cannot be placed on the market for consumers until 1 October of the year following the harvest.

These amendments do not require any amendments to the single document.

17. Checks on packaged batches

In Chapter I, Section IX(3)(b), of the specification, the rule has been abolished that required sample bottles to be kept for checks on packaged batches.

This rule is a measure of verifiability. It is now part of the checking plan.

The single document is not affected by this amendment.

18. Storing packaged wines

In Chapter I, Section IX(4), of the specification, further details have been provided of the characteristics of the place where packaged wines are stored.

This helps operators to comply with this rule, and makes checking easier.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

19. Human factors contributing to the link with the geographical area

—

The single document has not been changed on account of these amendments.

20. Description of the wine(s):

In Chapter I, Section X(2), of the specification, details have been added of the visual appearance of the white wines in order to characterise them more fully.

In the case of the first two types of wine described: ‘The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to golden yellow.’

Details of the last two types of wine: ‘The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to amber yellow.’

Point 4 of the single document has been amended.

A description of the main organoleptic characteristics of the red wines has been added for the designations of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Hengst’ and ‘Alsace grand cru Kirchberg de Barr’.

These descriptions do not affect the single document.

21. Link with the geographical area

The single document has not been amended.

22. Transitional measures

This amendment does not affect the single document.

23. Requirement to state the sugar content on labelling and other formats giving information for white wines

This information makes it easier for consumers to understand the type of wine.

The new rule does not apply to wines bearing the traditional terms ‘Vendanges Tardives’ and ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ [includes botrytised grapes].

Point 9 of the single document has been supplemented.

The original point (d) of Section XII(2) is now point (e).

This amendment does not affect the single document.

24. Advance declaration of the assignment of parcels

This amendment does not affect the single document.

SINGLE DOCUMENT

1. Name(s)

Alsace grand cru Winzenberg

2. Geographical indication type

PDO – Protected designation of origin

3. Categories of grapevine products

Wine

4. Description of the wine(s)

BRIEF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION

The wines are still and white.

The other analytical characteristics are as laid down by EU legislation.

There are two types: — dry wines with minerality; — aromatic wines that are fruity, unctuous and rich. The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to golden yellow.

General analytical characteristics
Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum total acidity	in milliequivalents per litre
Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre)
Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

2. Designation followed by the words ‘Vendanges Tardives’

BRIEF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION

The minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume of the wines is 16 % for Gewürztraminer Rs and Pinot Gris G, and 14,5 % for the other varieties.

The other analytical characteristics are as laid down by EU legislation.

Wines with the description ‘Vendanges Tardives’ often have very exotic aromas, of candied fruits with a fresh finish. They are remarkably concentrated with long-lasting aromas. The colour of these wines is deep and intense and ranges to amber yellow.

General analytical characteristics
Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum total acidity	in milliequivalents per litre
Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre)
Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

3. Designation followed by the words ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’

BRIEF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION

The minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume of the wines is 18,2 % for Gewürztraminer Rs and Pinot Gris G, and 16,4 % for other varieties.

The other analytical characteristics are as laid down by EU legislation.

Wines entitled to be labelled ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ are more concentrated, powerful wines, often with aromas of candied fruits. They are remarkably concentrated with long-lasting aromas. The colour of these wines is deep and intense and ranges to amber yellow.

General analytical characteristics
Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum total acidity	in milliequivalents per litre
Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre)
Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

5. Wine-making practices

5.1. Specific oenological practices

1. Training systems: planting density

Cultivation method

The minimum vine planting density is 4 500 plants per hectare.

The distance between the rows of vines must not exceed 2 metres.

Vines have an in-the-row spacing of no less than 0,75 metres and no more than 1,50 metres.

As of 25 October 2011, grubbing-up of rows within a parcel must not result in spacing wider than 3 metres between the rows.

2. Training systems: pruning rule

Cultivation method

The vines are pruned to single or double Guyot with a maximum of 18 buds per plant.

3. Harvest

Cultivation method

The wines are made from grapes harvested manually.

4. Increase in the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume

Specific oenological practice

Any increase in the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume must not exceed:

0,5 % for wines made from the varieties Gewürztraminer B and Pinot Gris G,

1,.5 % for wines made from other varieties.

Wines eligible for the term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ must not be enriched.

5. Production

Wine-making restriction

Use of wood chips is prohibited.

6. Maturing the wines

Specific oenological practice

The wines must be matured until at least 1 June of the year following the harvest.

Wines eligible for the term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ must be matured until at least 1 June of the second year following the harvest.

5.2. Maximum yields

1.	Designation with or without the additional term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ 60 hectolitres per hectare

2.	Designation followed by the words ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ 48 hectolitres per hectare

6. Demarcated geographical area

The grapes are harvested and the wines are produced, developed and matured in the following municipalities, based on the 2021 Official Geographic Code:

—

Municipalities partially included: Kaysersberg Vignoble, only the territory of the delegated municipalities of Kientzheim and Sigolsheim.

—

A map defining the boundaries of the geographical area has been lodged with the municipal authorities of the partially included municipalities.

Maps of the geographical area can be accessed on the INAO website.

7. Wine grape variety(-ies)

Gewürztraminer Rs

Muscat Ottonel B – Muscat, Moscato

Muscat à petits grains blancs B – Muscat, Moscato

Muscat à petits grains roses Rs – Muscat, Moscato

Pinot Gris G

Riesling B

8. Description of the link(s)

Thanks to the favourable climate conditions characteristic of the vineyards of Alsace, the protected designation of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Winzenberg’ benefits from one of the best locations. Nestling in the picturesque countryside of Alsace, the vineyards enable the production of highly expressive wines, with distinctive character and unique personality.

The mesoclimate is conducive to the production of elegant, fine wines. Its unique geology gives the wines a liveliness and a crystalline purity that can be detected on all levels of tasting.

The maturation period laid down in the specification allows the wines to improve.

They are the top of the range for this region. These wines are more prestigious than wines with the protected designation of origin ‘Alsace’.

The work by Médard Barth entitled Der Rebbau des Elsass und die Absatzgebieten seiner Weine, written in 1958, spoke highly of this lieu-dit, which today is famous. The name Winzenberg already appears in a parchment deed dating back to 1477.

9. Essential further conditions (packaging, labelling, other requirements)

Area in immediate proximity

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Derogation concerning production in the demarcated geographical area

Description of the condition

The area in the immediate vicinity, defined by derogation for winemaking, processing and maturing, comprises the territory of the following municipalities, based on the 2021 Official Geographic Code:

—

Municipalities partially included: Kaysersberg Vignoble, only the territory of the delegated municipality of Kaysersberg.

—

Packaging in the area

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Packaging in the demarcated geographical area

Description of the condition

Since the Law of 5 July 1972, the wines must be bottled in the departments of Bas-Rhin and Haut-Rhin in tall, thin ‘Vin du Rhin’ bottles, as laid down in the Decree of 1955.

Stating the vintage

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

The vintage must appear, together with the name of the designation, in any harvest and stock declarations, supporting documents or publicity and on any leaflets, labels, invoices or containers.

Common name

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

Use of two or more common names on the same label is prohibited.

The common names are as follows:

Gewürztraminer

Muscat

Muscat Ottonel

Pinot Gris

Riesling.

Traditional terms ‘Vendanges Tardives’ and ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

For wines eligible for the term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’, the following must also be stated:

—

vintage

—	one of the common forms of the grape variety name.

Indication of the sugar content

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

Link to the product specification

https://info.agriculture.gouv.fr/gedei/site/bo-agri/document_administratif-4cec3ff9-abd4-4253-a1db-245ddd809faa

(1) OJ L 9, 11.1.2019, p. 2.

26.9.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/53

(2022/C 367/13)

This communication is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1).

COMMUNICATING THE APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT

‘Alsace grand cru Rosacker’

PDO-FR-A0341-AM02

Date of communication: 20 July 2022

DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT

1. Additional indication

These amendments do not require any amendments to the single document.

2. Types of product

The ‘Alsace grand cru’ protected designations of origin which cover red and white still wines are mentioned by name: ‘Alsace grand cru Hengst’ and ‘Alsace grand cru Kirchberg de Barr’.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

3. Geographical area

These editorial changes do not affect the boundary of the geographical area.

The following sentences have also been added to Section IV(1):

‘Maps of the geographical area can be accessed on the INAO website.

A map defining the boundaries of the geographical area has been lodged with the municipal authorities in the case of the partially included municipality.’

These amendments require the amendment of point 6 of the single document.

4. Demarcated parcel area

In Chapter I, Section IV(2), of the specification:

—	in order to correct an oversight, the words ‘6 and 7 September 2006’ have been added to the first paragraph. This is a date on which the parcel area was approved by the relevant national committee;

—	in the second paragraph, the wording has been amended to take into account the changes made to the names of municipalities in Section IV(1);

—	the ‘Municipalities’ column in the table has been updated to correspond to the names of municipalities mentioned in Section IV(1).

These amendments do not affect the single document.

5. Area in immediate proximity

These editorial changes do not affect the boundary of the area in immediate proximity.

These amendments require the amendment of point 9 of the single document.

6. Vine varieties

The single document has not been changed on account of these amendments.

7. Planting density

The single document has not been changed on account of these additions.

This amendment requires the amendment of point 5 of the single document.

8. Pruning rule

This development makes it possible to harmonise the wording in the specifications of the Alsace designations of origin, and to simplify the methods of checking.

Point 5 of the single document has been amended.

The above amendments do not affect the single document.

9. Rules on trellising and foliage height

These amendments make it possible to verify that the foliage height is compliant as the plants grow. Previously this was possible only through a requirement relating to the support.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

10. Average maximum crop load per parcel

An average maximum crop load per parcel has been established for red wines. It is less than that for white wine, reflecting the yields for red wines.

These amendments do not affect the single document.

11. Ripeness of grapes and minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume

These amendments do not affect the single document.

12. Yields

Point 5 of the single document has been amended for the maximum yields (upper yield limits).

The latter amendments do not affect the single document.

13. Malolactic fermentation, fermentable sugar content for red wines

Chapter I, Section IX(1)(c), of the specification lays down that malolactic fermentation is carried out for red wines.

For the purpose of checking compliance with this rule, the maximum malic acid content has been established as 0,4 grams per litre at the time of packaging.

Section IX(1)(d) lays down a maximum content for fermentable sugars (glucose and fructose) of 2 grams per litre after fermentation.

The single document has not been amended.

14. Increasing the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume prohibited for red wines

The single document has not been amended.

15. Capacity of the winery

In Chapter I, Section IX(1)(g), of the specification, the coefficient for calculating the capacity of the winery has been reduced.

The capacity of the winery does not need to be as large in proportion to the volume of the preceding harvest.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

16. Date of maturing and placing on the market for consumers in the case of red wines

In Chapter I, Section IX(5)(a), it is stated that, following the maturation period, red wines cannot be placed on the market for consumers until 1 October of the year following the harvest.

These amendments do not require any amendments to the single document.

17. Checks on packaged batches

In Chapter I, Section IX(3)(b), of the specification, the rule has been abolished that required sample bottles to be kept for checks on packaged batches.

This rule is a measure of verifiability. It is now part of the checking plan.

The single document is not affected by this amendment.

18. Storing packaged wines

In Chapter I, Section IX(4), of the specification, further details have been provided of the characteristics of the place where packaged wines are stored.

This helps operators to comply with this rule, and makes checking easier.

This amendment does not affect the single document.

19. Human factors contributing to the link with the geographical area

—

The single document has not been changed on account of these amendments.

20. Description of the wine(s):

In Chapter I, Section X(2), of the specification, details have been added of the visual appearance of the white wines in order to characterise them more fully.

In the case of the first two types of wine described: ‘The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to golden yellow.’

Details of the last two types of wine: ‘The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to amber yellow.’

Point 4 of the single document has been amended.

A description of the main organoleptic characteristics of the red wines has been added for the designations of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Hengst’ and ‘Alsace grand cru Kirchberg de Barr’.

These descriptions do not affect the single document.

21. Link with the geographical area

The single document has not been amended.

22. Transitional measures

This amendment does not affect the single document.

23. Requirement to state the sugar content on labelling and other formats giving information for white wines

This information makes it easier for consumers to understand the type of wine.

The new rule does not apply to wines bearing the traditional terms ‘Vendanges Tardives’ and ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ [includes botrytised grapes].

Point 9 of the single document has been supplemented.

The original point (d) of Section XII(2) is now point (e).

This amendment does not affect the single document.

24. Advance declaration of the assignment of parcels

This amendment does not affect the single document.

SINGLE DOCUMENT

1. Name(s)

Alsace grand cru Rosacker

2. Geographical indication type

PDO – Protected designation of origin

3. Categories of grapevine products

Wine

4. Description of the wine(s)

BRIEF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION

The wines are still and white.

The other analytical characteristics are as laid down by EU legislation.

There are two types: — dry wines with minerality; — aromatic wines that are fruity, unctuous and rich. The colour of these two types of wine is deep and intense and ranges to golden yellow.

General analytical characteristics
Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum total acidity	in milliequivalents per litre
Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre)
Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

2. Designation followed by the words ‘Vendanges Tardives’

BRIEF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION

The minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume of the wines is 16 % for Gewürztraminer Rs and Pinot Gris G, and 14,5 % for the other varieties.

The other analytical characteristics are as laid down by EU legislation.

Wines with the description ‘Vendanges Tardives’ often have very exotic aromas, of candied fruits with a fresh finish. They are remarkably concentrated with long-lasting aromas. The colour of these wines is deep and intense and ranges to amber yellow.

General analytical characteristics
Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum total acidity	in milliequivalents per litre
Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre)
Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

3. Designation followed by the words ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’

BRIEF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION

The minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume of the wines is 18,2 % for Gewürztraminer Rs and Pinot Gris G, and 16,4 % for other varieties.

The other analytical characteristics are as laid down by EU legislation.

Wines entitled to be labelled ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ are more concentrated, powerful wines, often with aromas of candied fruits. They are remarkably concentrated with long-lasting aromas. The colour of these wines is deep and intense and ranges to amber yellow.

General analytical characteristics
Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)
Minimum total acidity	in milliequivalents per litre
Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre)
Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

5. Wine-making practices

5.1. Specific oenological practices

1. Training systems: planting density

Cultivation method

The minimum vine planting density is 4 500 plants per hectare.

The distance between the rows of vines must not exceed 2 metres.

Vines have an in-the-row spacing of no less than 0,75 metres and no more than 1,50 metres.

As of 25 October 2011, grubbing-up of rows within a parcel must not result in spacing wider than 3 metres between the rows.

2. Training systems: pruning rule

Cultivation method

The vines are pruned to single or double Guyot with a maximum of 18 buds per plant.

3. Harvest

Cultivation method

The wines are made from grapes harvested manually.

4. Increase in the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume

Specific oenological practice

Any increase in the minimum natural alcoholic strength by volume must not exceed:

0,5 % for wines made from the varieties Gewürztraminer B and Pinot Gris G,

1,5 % for wines made from other varieties.

Wines eligible for the term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ must not be enriched.

5. Production

Wine-making restriction

Use of wood chips is prohibited.

6. Maturing the wines

Specific oenological practice

The wines must be matured until at least 1 June of the year following the harvest.

Wines eligible for the term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’ must be matured until at least 1 June of the second year following the harvest.

5.2. Maximum yields

1. Designation with or without the additional term ‘Vendanges Tardives’

60 hectolitres per hectare

2. Designation followed by the words ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’

48 hectolitres per hectare

6. Demarcated geographical area

The grapes are harvested and the wines are produced, developed and matured in the following municipalities, based on the 2021 Official Geographic Code:

—

Municipalities partially included: Kaysersberg Vignoble, only the territory of the delegated municipalities of Kientzheim and Sigolsheim.

—	Department of Bas-Rhin: Andlau, Barr, Bergbieten, Blienschwiller, Dahlenheim, Dambach-la-Ville, Eichhoffen, Kintzheim, Marlenheim, Mittelbergheim, Molsheim, Nothalten, Scharrachbergheim-Irmstett and Wolxheim.

A map defining the boundaries of the geographical area has been lodged with the municipal authorities of the partially included municipalities.

Maps of the geographical area can be accessed on the INAO website.

7. Wine grape variety(-ies)

Gewürztraminer Rs

Muscat Ottonel B – Muscat, Moscato

Muscat à petits grains blancs B – Muscat, Moscato

Muscat à petits grains roses Rs – Muscat, Moscato

Pinot Gris G

Riesling B

8. Description of the link(s)

Thanks to the favourable climate conditions characteristic of the vineyards of Alsace, the protected designation of origin ‘Alsace grand cru Rosacker’ benefits from one of the best locations. Nestling in the picturesque countryside of Alsace, the vineyards enable the production of highly expressive wines, with distinctive character and unique personality.

The depth of the soil combined with Rosacker’s climate – in which the grapes take longer to ripen – gives rise to wines with a powerful and ripe acid structure (tartaric acid), which provides considerable length and freshness. The long, regular and complete ripening of the grapes ensures finesse and aromatic complexity.

The maturation period laid down in the specification allows the wines to improve.

They are the top of the range for this region. These wines are more prestigious than wines with the protected designation of origin ‘Alsace’.

The work by Médard Barth entitled Der Rebbau des Elsass und die Absatzgebieten seiner Weine, written in 1958, spoke highly of this lieu-dit, which today is famous.

9. Essential further conditions (packaging, labelling, other requirements)

Area in immediate proximity

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Derogation concerning production in the demarcated geographical area

Description of the condition

The area in the immediate vicinity, defined by derogation for winemaking, processing and maturing, comprises the territory of the following municipalities, based on the 2021 Official Geographic Code:

—

Municipalities partially included: Kaysersberg Vignoble, only the territory of the delegated municipality of Kaysersberg.

—

Packaging in the area

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Packaging in the demarcated geographical area

Description of the condition

Since the Law of 5 July 1972, the wines must be bottled in the departments of Bas-Rhin and Haut-Rhin in tall, thin ‘Vin du Rhin’ bottles, as laid down in the Decree of 1955.

Stating the vintage

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

The vintage must appear, together with the name of the designation, in any harvest and stock declarations, supporting documents or publicity and on any leaflets, labels, invoices or containers.

Common name

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

Use of two or more common names on the same label is prohibited.

The common names are as follows:

Gewürztraminer

Muscat

Muscat Ottonel

Pinot Gris

Riesling.

Traditional terms ‘Vendanges Tardives’ and ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

For wines eligible for the term ‘Vendanges Tardives’ or ‘Sélection de Grains Nobles’, the following must also be stated:

—

vintage

—	one of the common forms of the grape variety name.

Indication of the sugar content

Legal framework

National legislation

Type of further condition

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition

Link to the product specification

https://info.agriculture.gouv.fr/gedei/site/bo-agri/document_administratif-4cec3ff9-abd4-4253-a1db-245ddd809faa

(1) OJ L 9, 11.1.2019, p. 2.

		ISSN 1977-091X
Official Journal of the European Union		C 367

English edition	Information and Notices	Volume 65 26 September 2022

Contents		page
	II Information
	INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES
	European Commission
2022/C 367/01	Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10850 – ASMENT DE TEMARA / VEOM / JV) ( 1 )	1
2022/C 367/02	Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10871 – E.ON / FSI / WESTENERGIE BREITBAND) ( 1 )	2

	IV Notices
	NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES
	European Commission
2022/C 367/04	Euro exchange rates — 23 September 2022	10
2022/C 367/05	Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 October 2022 (Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 )	11

	Currency	Exchange rate
USD	US dollar	0,9754
JPY	Japanese yen	139,43
DKK	Danish krone	7,4365
GBP	Pound sterling	0,88201
SEK	Swedish krona	10,9328
CHF	Swiss franc	0,9565
ISK	Iceland króna	139,90
NOK	Norwegian krone	10,2335
BGN	Bulgarian lev	1,9558
CZK	Czech koruna	24,658
HUF	Hungarian forint	406,30
PLN	Polish zloty	4,7543
RON	Romanian leu	4,9433
TRY	Turkish lira	17,9515
AUD	Australian dollar	1,4828
CAD	Canadian dollar	1,3177
HKD	Hong Kong dollar	7,6567
NZD	New Zealand dollar	1,6846
SGD	Singapore dollar	1,3897
KRW	South Korean won	1 381,97
ZAR	South African rand	17,3853
CNY	Chinese yuan renminbi	6,9442
HRK	Croatian kuna	7,5228
IDR	Indonesian rupiah	14 697,30
MYR	Malaysian ringgit	4,4659
PHP	Philippine peso	57,217
RUB	Russian rouble
THB	Thai baht	36,636
BRL	Brazilian real	5,0456
MXN	Mexican peso	19,5708
INR	Indian rupee	79,0705

	III Preparatory acts
	EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
2022/C 367/03	Opinion of the European Central Bank of 28 July 2022 on a proposal for a regulation amending the Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CON/2022/25)	3

	V Announcements
	PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY
	European Commission
2022/C 367/06	Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10935 – DNB / DANSKE BANK / SB1 / EIKA / BALDER / VIPPS / MOBILEPAY) ( 1 )	12
2022/C 367/07	Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10840 – INFINIGATE / NUVIAS) ( 1 )	14
2022/C 367/08	Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10863 – HANWHA Q CELLS / ENERCITY / LYNQTECH) – Candidate case for simplified procedure ( 1 )	15
2022/C 367/09	Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10909 – KFW / NEDERLANDSE GASUNIE / JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure ( 1 )	17
	OTHER ACTS
	European Commission
2022/C 367/10	Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33	19
2022/C 367/11	Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33	31
2022/C 367/12	Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33	42
2022/C 367/13	Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33	53


	(1) Text with EEA relevance.