ISSN 1725-2423 doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.189.eng |
||
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189 |
|
English edition |
Information and Notices |
Volume 54 |
Notice No |
Contents |
page |
|
II Information |
|
|
INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
|
|
European Commission |
|
2011/C 189/01 |
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections ( 1 ) |
|
|
III Preparatory acts |
|
|
European Commission |
|
2011/C 189/02 |
||
|
IV Notices |
|
|
NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
|
|
European Commission |
|
2011/C 189/03 |
||
2011/C 189/04 |
||
2011/C 189/05 |
COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission |
|
2011/C 189/06 |
Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union |
|
2011/C 189/07 |
||
|
NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
|
2011/C 189/08 |
||
2011/C 189/09 |
||
|
V Announcements |
|
|
PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
|
|
European Commission |
|
2011/C 189/10 |
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6172 — Daimler/Rolls-Royce/Tognum/Bergen) ( 1 ) |
|
2011/C 189/11 |
Summary of Commission Decision of 3 May 2011 waiving certain commitments in Decision 98/526/EC in Case IV/M.950 — Hoffmann-La Roche/Boehringer Mannheim with respect to the DNA probes market (Case IV/M.950 — Hoffmann-La Roche/Boehringer Mannheim) (notified under document C(2011) 2981 final) ( 1 ) |
|
2011/C 189/12 |
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6291 — CD&R Fund VIII/SPIE) — Candidate case for simplified procedure ( 1 ) |
|
|
OTHER ACTS |
|
|
European Commission |
|
2011/C 189/13 |
||
2011/C 189/14 |
||
2011/C 189/15 |
||
|
|
|
(1) Text with EEA relevance |
EN |
|
II Information
INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES
European Commission
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/1 |
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 189/01
Date of adoption of the decision |
31.5.2011 |
|||||||
Reference number of State Aid |
N 557/10 |
|||||||
Member State |
United Kingdom |
|||||||
Region |
— |
|||||||
Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) |
Amendment to the Renewables Obligation Certificates |
|||||||
Legal basis |
s 32 Electricity Act 1989 (1989 Chapter 29), as amended by ss 37-40 of the Energy Act 2008 (2008 Chapter 32) Implemented by the Renewables Obligation Order 2009 (No 785) as amended by Renewables Obligation Order 2010 (No 1107) to be amended by Renewables Obligation Order 2011 |
|||||||
Type of measure |
Aid scheme |
|||||||
Objective |
Environmental protection |
|||||||
Form of aid |
Transactions not on market terms |
|||||||
Budget |
Overall budget: GBP 7 108 million |
|||||||
Intensity |
— |
|||||||
Duration (period) |
Until 31.3.2021 |
|||||||
Economic sectors |
Energy |
|||||||
Name and address of the granting authority |
|
|||||||
Other information |
— |
The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm
Date of adoption of the decision |
7.3.2011 |
||||
Reference number of State Aid |
SA.32261 (11/N) |
||||
Member State |
Slovenia |
||||
Region |
— |
||||
Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) |
Nova Ljubljanska Banka d.d. („NLB“) |
||||
Legal basis |
Strateški načrt NLB |
||||
Type of measure |
Individual aid |
||||
Objective |
Aid to remedy serious disturbances in the economy |
||||
Form of aid |
Other forms of equity intervention |
||||
Budget |
Overall budget: EUR 250 million |
||||
Intensity |
— |
||||
Duration (period) |
Until 7.9.2011 |
||||
Economic sectors |
Financial intermediation |
||||
Name and address of the granting authority |
|
||||
Other information |
— |
The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm
Date of adoption of the decision |
22.3.2011 |
||||
Reference number of State Aid |
SA.32470 (11/N) |
||||
Member State |
Finland |
||||
Region |
— |
||||
Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) |
Kiinteä toimintatuki uusiutuvia energialähteitä käyttäville voimaloille Fast driftstöd till kraftverk som använder förnybara energikällor |
||||
Legal basis |
Laki uusiutuvilla energialähteillä tuotetun sähkön tuotantotuesta (1396/2010); Lag om stöd till produktion av el från förnybara energikällor (1396/2010) |
||||
Type of measure |
Aid scheme |
||||
Objective |
Environmental protection |
||||
Form of aid |
Direct grant |
||||
Budget |
Overall budget: EUR 21,35 million |
||||
Intensity |
50 % |
||||
Duration (period) |
Until 1.2.2016 |
||||
Economic sectors |
Energy |
||||
Name and address of the granting authority |
|
||||
Other information |
— |
The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm
Date of adoption of the decision |
31.5.2011 |
Reference number of State Aid |
SA.32986 (11/N) |
Member State |
Spain |
Region |
— |
Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) |
Prórroga del Régimen temporal de concesión de ayudas en forma de garantía (ayuda de Estado N 68/10) — España |
Legal basis |
Acuerdo de la Comisión Delegada del Gobierno para Asuntos Económicos sobre el marco nacional transitorio de concesión de garantías públicas para facilitar el acceso a la financiación en el actual contexto de crisis económica y financiera. |
Type of measure |
Aid scheme |
Objective |
Aid to remedy serious disturbances in the economy |
Form of aid |
Guarantee |
Budget |
Overall budget: EUR 700 million |
Intensity |
— |
Duration (period) |
Until 31.12.2011 |
Economic sectors |
All sectors |
Name and address of the granting authority |
Todas las autoridades competentes en España |
Other information |
— |
The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm
III Preparatory acts
European Commission
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/5 |
Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission
2011/C 189/02
Document |
Part |
Date |
Title |
COM(2011) 153 |
|
19.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the position to be adopted by the European Union and its Member States within the Association Council established by the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part, with regard to the adoption of a Recommendation on the implementation of the EU-Jordan ENP Action Plan |
COM(2011) 158 |
|
8.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Implementing Decision authorising Sweden to apply a reduced rate of electricity tax to electricity directly provided to vessels at berth in a port (shore-side electricity) in accordance with Article 19 of Directive 2003/96/EC |
COM(2011) 169 |
|
13.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity |
COM(2011) 182 |
|
7.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision providing precautionary EU medium-term financial assistance for Romania |
COM(2011) 188 |
|
11.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the position to be adopted by the European Union, within the EC-Andorra Joint Committee, on the list of customs security provisions to be established under Article 12b(1) of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Economic Community, on the one hand, and the Principality of Andorra, on the other |
COM(2011) 189 |
|
12.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment |
COM(2011) 191 |
|
11.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation extending the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 598/2009 on imports of biodiesel originating in the United States of America to imports of biodiesel consigned from Canada, whether declared as originating in Canada or not, and extending the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 598/2009 to imports of biodiesel in a blend containing by weight 20 % or less of biodiesel originating in the United States of America, and terminating the investigation in respect of imports consigned from Singapore |
COM(2011) 192 |
|
11.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 599/2009 on imports of biodiesel originating in the United States of America to imports of biodiesel consigned from Canada, whether declared as originating in Canada or not, and extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 599/2009 to imports of biodiesel in a blend containing by weight 20 % or less of biodiesel originating in the United States of America, and terminating the investigation in respect of imports consigned from Singapore |
COM(2011) 193 |
|
11.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation determining measures on fixing certain aids, refunds and prices related to the single common organisation of agricultural markets |
COM(2011) 197 |
|
13.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of melamine originating in the People's Republic of China |
COM(2011) 198 |
|
12.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of coated fine paper originating in the People’s Republic of China |
COM(2011) 201 |
|
12.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation imposing a definitive anti-subsidy duty on imports of coated fine paper originating in the People's Republic of China |
COM(2011) 203 |
|
13.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of zeolite A powder originating in Bosnia and Herzegovina |
COM(2011) 207 |
|
14.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India |
COM(2011) 209 |
|
13.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of furfuraldehyde originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 |
COM(2011) 210 |
|
18.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating in the People's Republic of China and Thailand, and terminating the proceeding on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating in Malaysia |
COM(2011) 212 |
|
14.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2010/031 BE/General Motors Belgium from Belgium) |
COM(2011) 215 |
|
13.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection |
COM(2011) 216 |
|
13.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements |
COM(2011) 221 |
|
20.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the signing of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs |
COM(2011) 223 |
|
20.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs |
COM(2011) 224 |
|
20.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 521/2008 setting up the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking |
COM(2011) 226 |
|
20.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management as regards the multiannual financial framework, to address additional financing needs of the ITER project |
COM(2011) 227 |
|
27.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation concerning the allocation of fishing opportunities under the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Cape Verde |
COM(2011) 228 |
|
27.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of a new Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Cape Verde |
COM(2011) 229 |
|
27.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and the provisional application of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Cape Verde |
COM(2011) 230 |
|
26.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council and Commission Decision on a Union position concerning a Decision of the EU–Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Council amending its Rules of Procedure |
COM(2011) 231 |
|
28.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff |
COM(2011) 233 |
|
18.4.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on appointing members of the European Social Fund Committee |
COM(2011) 235 |
|
4.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Implementing Decision authorising Romania to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax |
COM(2011) 238 |
|
2.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland, of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part; and on the conclusion of the Ancillary Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the first part, Iceland, of the second part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the third part, on the application of the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland, of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part |
COM(2011) 239 |
|
2.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the signature and provisional application of the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland, of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part; and on the signature and provisional application of the Ancillary Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the first part, Iceland, of the second part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the third part, on the application of the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland, of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part |
COM(2011) 241 |
|
10.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences |
COM(2011) 243 |
|
2.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 57/2011 as regards fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks |
COM(2011) 245 |
|
5.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals |
COM(2011) 250 |
|
5.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the allocation of funds decommitted from projects under the 9th and previous European Development Funds (EDF) for development cooperation in South Sudan |
COM(2011) 251 |
|
6.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2010/025 DK/Odense Steel Shipyard from Denmark) |
COM(2011) 252 |
|
6.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on Air Transport between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Federative Republic of Brazil, of the other part |
COM(2011) 253 |
|
6.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the signature of the Agreement on Air Transport between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Federative Republic of Brazil, of the other part |
COM(2011) 258 |
|
6.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2010/022 DK/LM Glasfiber from Denmark) |
COM(2011) 259 |
|
18.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation temporarily suspending autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on imports of certain industrial products into the Canary Islands |
COM(2011) 261 |
|
11.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation terminating the anti-dumping proceeding on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in the People's Republic of China |
COM(2011) 262 |
|
16.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on a Union position on Decision No 1/2011 of the Joint Management Committee for Sanitary and Phytosanitary matters set up by the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part regarding the amendment of Appendix V.A. to Annex IV to the Association Agreement |
COM(2011) 265 |
|
16.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision extending Decision 2010/371/EU concerning the conclusion of the consultation procedure with the Republic of Madagascar under Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement |
COM(2011) 266 |
|
6.5.2011 |
Joint Proposal for a Council Regulation concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria |
COM(2011) 267 |
|
18.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion by the European Union of the amended Constitution and Rules of Procedure of the International Rubber Study Group |
COM(2011) 268 |
|
10.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Implementing Decision amending Implementing Decision 2011/77/EU of 7 December 2010 on granting Union financial assistance to Ireland |
COM(2011) 269 |
|
17.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 7/2010 opening and providing for the management of autonomous tariff quotas of the Union for certain agricultural and industrial products |
COM(2011) 270 |
|
17.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 temporarily suspending the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial, agricultural and fishery products |
COM(2011) 273 |
|
10.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Implementing Decision on granting Union financial assistance to Portugal |
COM(2011) 277 |
|
20.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the signing of a Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Central African Republic on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (FLEGT) |
COM(2011) 279 |
|
18.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the signing by the European Union of the amended Constitution and Rules of Procedure of the International Rubber Study Group |
COM(2011) 280 |
|
19.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the signature of the Agreement between the European Union and Australia on the processing and transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data by air carriers to the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service |
COM(2011) 281 |
|
19.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Australia on the processing and transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data by air carriers to the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service |
COM(2011) 282 |
|
20.5.2011 |
Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of a Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Central African Republic on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (FLEGT) |
These texts are available on EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
IV Notices
NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES
European Commission
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/11 |
Euro exchange rates (1)
28 June 2011
2011/C 189/03
1 euro =
|
Currency |
Exchange rate |
USD |
US dollar |
1,4261 |
JPY |
Japanese yen |
115,31 |
DKK |
Danish krone |
7,4590 |
GBP |
Pound sterling |
0,89420 |
SEK |
Swedish krona |
9,2475 |
CHF |
Swiss franc |
1,1884 |
ISK |
Iceland króna |
|
NOK |
Norwegian krone |
7,8020 |
BGN |
Bulgarian lev |
1,9558 |
CZK |
Czech koruna |
24,398 |
HUF |
Hungarian forint |
269,73 |
LTL |
Lithuanian litas |
3,4528 |
LVL |
Latvian lats |
0,7097 |
PLN |
Polish zloty |
4,0132 |
RON |
Romanian leu |
4,2105 |
TRY |
Turkish lira |
2,3461 |
AUD |
Australian dollar |
1,3630 |
CAD |
Canadian dollar |
1,4070 |
HKD |
Hong Kong dollar |
11,1042 |
NZD |
New Zealand dollar |
1,7762 |
SGD |
Singapore dollar |
1,7718 |
KRW |
South Korean won |
1 545,36 |
ZAR |
South African rand |
9,7863 |
CNY |
Chinese yuan renminbi |
9,2272 |
HRK |
Croatian kuna |
7,3793 |
IDR |
Indonesian rupiah |
12 305,45 |
MYR |
Malaysian ringgit |
4,3507 |
PHP |
Philippine peso |
62,098 |
RUB |
Russian rouble |
40,2485 |
THB |
Thai baht |
44,152 |
BRL |
Brazilian real |
2,2732 |
MXN |
Mexican peso |
16,9650 |
INR |
Indian rupee |
64,2320 |
(1) Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/12 |
Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission
2011/C 189/04
History of previous publications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/13 |
COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission
2011/C 189/05
Document |
Part |
Date |
Title |
COM(2011) 166 |
|
11.4.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the functioning and effects of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 concerning the rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility when travelling by air |
COM(2011) 168 |
|
13.4.2011 |
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee — ‘Smarter energy taxation for the EU: proposal for a revision of the Energy Taxation Directive’ |
COM(2011) 171 |
|
30.3.2011 |
Report to the European Parliament and the Council — ‘Equivalence between old and new career structures’ — Article 6 of the Staff Regulations |
COM(2011) 174 |
|
11.4.2011 |
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of Regulation 261/2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights |
COM(2011) 175 |
|
11.4.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation since 2007 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States |
COM(2011) 176 |
|
12.4.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council based on Article 8 of Council Decision 2007/845/JHA of 6 December 2007 concerning cooperation between asset recovery offices of the Member States in the field of tracing and identification of proceeds from, or other property related to, crime |
COM(2011) 180 |
|
6.4.2011 |
Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — ‘The European Union’s policy approach to the ITU World Radiocommunication Conference 2012 (WRC-12)’ |
COM(2011) 183 |
|
7.4.2011 |
Recommendation for a Council Decision granting mutual assistance for Romania |
COM(2011) 184 |
|
11.4.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on science and technology statistics |
COM(2011) 186 |
|
8.4.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council — ‘Interim evaluation of the Eurostars Joint Programme’ |
COM(2011) 187 |
|
11.4.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the quality of fiscal data reported by Member States in 2010 |
COM(2011) 195 |
|
11.4.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — ‘Implementation of the European Progress Microfinance Facility — 2010’ |
COM(2011) 199 |
|
15.4.2011 |
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council — ‘Technical adjustment of the financial framework for 2012 in line with movements in GNI (point 16 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management)’ |
COM(2011) 202 |
|
12.4.2011 |
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — ‘Smart grids: from innovation to deployment’ |
COM(2011) 204 |
|
14.4.2011 |
Joint report to the Council and the European Parliament — ‘Annual Report — Hong Kong 2010’ |
COM(2011) 205 |
|
14.4.2011 |
Joint report to the European Parliament and the Council — ‘Annual Report — Macao 2010’ |
COM(2011) 206 |
|
13.4.2011 |
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — ‘Single Market Act — Twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence — Working together to create new growth’ |
COM(2011) 211 |
|
15.4.2011 |
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council — ‘Towards robust quality management for European statistics’ |
COM(2011) 214 |
|
15.4.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on socioeconomic implications of GMO cultivation on the basis of Member States’ contributions, as requested by the conclusions of the Environment Council of December 2008 |
COM(2011) 217 |
|
20.4.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the implementation of the European Energy Programme for Recovery |
COM(2011) 219 |
|
15.4.2011 |
Draft amending budget No 3 to the general budget 2011 — Statement of expenditure by section — Section III — Commission |
COM(2011) 220 |
|
20.4.2011 |
Commission report to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — ‘Interim evaluation of the “Youth in Action” programme’ |
COM(2011) 222 |
|
19.4.2011 |
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — ‘The open Internet and net neutrality in Europe’ |
COM(2011) 225 |
|
18.4.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament — ‘Evaluation report on the Data Retention Directive (Directive 2006/24/EC)’ |
COM(2011) 232 |
|
28.4.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Report assessing the implementation and the impact of the measures taken according to Directive 2002/59/EC establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system |
COM(2011) 240 |
|
2.5.2011 |
Communication from the Commission — ‘Developing a common aviation area with the Republic of Moldova’ |
COM(2011) 242 |
|
6.5.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 58/97 and of the Regulation (EC) No 295/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning structural business statistics which repealed and replaced Regulation No 58/97 |
COM(2011) 246 |
|
5.5.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament Report on the interim evaluation of the specific programme ‘Drug prevention and information’ (DPIP) 2007-2013 |
COM(2011) 248 |
|
4.5.2011 |
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — ‘Communication on migration’ |
COM(2011) 249 |
|
5.5.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Report on the interim evaluation of the ‘Fundamental Rights and Citizenship’ programme 2007-2013 |
COM(2011) 254 |
|
11.5.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Report on the interim evaluation of the ‘Daphne III Programme 2007-2013’ |
COM(2011) 255 |
|
11.5.2011 |
Evaluation report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council — ‘Interim evaluation report on the Criminal Justice programme’ |
COM(2011) 257 |
|
13.5.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on EAGF expenditure — ‘Early warning system No 1-3/2011’ |
COM(2011) 260 |
|
12.5.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — ‘Application of the southern hake and Norway lobster recovery plan’ |
COM(2011) 271 |
|
17.5.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council — ‘Report on the status of ratification and recommendations by monitoring bodies concerning conventions listed in Annex III to Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences pursuant to Article 8(3) of this Regulation — GSP+’ |
COM(2011) 272 |
|
17.5.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council — ‘GSP Statistical Report’ |
COM(2011) 286 |
|
23.5.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 2038/2006 on multiannual funding for the action of the European Maritime Safety Agency in the field of response to pollution caused by ships for the period 2007-2009 |
COM(2011) 301 |
|
23.5.2011 |
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on EAGF expenditure — ‘Early warning system No 4/2011’ |
These texts are available on EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/16 |
Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
2011/C 189/06
Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a), second indent, of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are amended as follows:
Chapter 27
Page 110
General
First paragraph, after the word ‘Materials’, delete the expression ‘published in the 1976 edition of standard definitions and specifications for petroleum and lubricating products’
Note 2
Second line, after ‘315 °C’, delete ‘ASTM D 1319-70’ and replace it with ‘EN 15553’
Additional note 5
Paragraph 2, subparagraph (d), after ‘softening’, add ‘or sweetening’
Page 111
Additional Note 5(b)
|
Paragraph 2, subparagraph (a):
|
|
Paragraph 2, subparagraph (b):
|
Additional Note 5(e)
Between ‘glycol’ and ‘morpholine’, add ‘N methyl’.
Page 112
Additional Note 5(l)
First, second and fourth lines, replace ‘deparaffining’ with ‘dewaxing’.
Page 115
2707 50 10 and 2707 50 90
In the phrase beginning with ‘These subheadings …’:
— |
replace ‘ASTM D 86-67’ with ‘EN ISO 3405’; |
— |
after ‘method’, delete ‘(reapproved 1972)’ and add ‘(equivalent to the ASTM D 86 method)’. |
Page 116
2707 99 91 and 2707 99 99
|
Paragraph 1, subparagraph (a):
|
|
Paragraph 1, subparagraph (b): After ‘15 °C’, add ‘by EN ISO 12185’. |
|
Paragraph 1, subparagraph (c): After ‘25 °C by the’, delete ‘ASTM D 5’ and replace it with ‘EN 1426’. |
Page 117
2710 11 11 to 2710 19 99
|
Paragraph I, subparagraph 1: After ‘ASTM D 938’, insert ‘method equivalent to the ISO 2207’. |
|
Paragraph I, subparagraph 2, indent (a):
|
|
Paragraph I, subparagraph 2, indent (b):
|
Page 118
Footnote 1
Delete this footnote: ‘(1) Where a product is found to be too hard for the worked cone penetration test by the ASTM D 217 method, the cone penetration test is to be applied by the ASTM D 937 method.’
Diagram
Modify the diagram as follows:
Page 119
2710 11 21
Delete the phrase ‘The term “Abel-Pensky method” means method DIN (Deutsche Industrienormen) 51755 — March 1974, published by the DNA (Deutsche Normenausschuß), Berlin 15.’
2710 19 11 to 2710 19 29
After ‘to this chapter’, insert the following text and figures.
Subheading 2710 19 21
This subheading covers kerosene type jet fuel. This jet fuel complies with the provisions of Additional Note 2(c) to this chapter.
The gas chromatographic profile of kerosene type jet fuel, for instance the most commonly used jet fuel A-1, is characteristic of an oil obtained by no other process than distillation of a crude oil. The chain length of the alkanes varies between about 10 and 18 carbon atoms. The distillation range according to the EN ISO 3405 method equivalent to the ASTM D 86 method is approximately 130 °C to 300 °C. The aromatic content may be up to 25 % by volume. Its flash point is generally above 38 °C according to the ISO 13736 method.
Jet fuel may contain the following additives: antioxidants, corrosion inhibitors, icing inhibitors, tracer dyes.
Page 120
Gas chromatographic profile of jet fuel type A-1 (kerosene)
Page 121
Subheading 2710 19 25
This subheading covers kerosene other than jet fuel. The kerosene of this subheading complies with the provisions of Additional Note 2(c) to this chapter.
Characteristics of some of these oils are their very low aromatic and olefin content to prevent the formation of soot during combustion.
In some cases, chemical markers are present.
This subheading excludes mixtures of kerosene and other mineral oils or organic solvents.
Gas chromatographic profile of low aromatic kerosene
Page 122
Subheading 2710 19 29
This subheading covers medium oils other than kerosene of subheadings 2710 19 21 and 2710 19 25. The oils of this subheading comply with the provisions of Additional Note 2(c) to this chapter.
An example of these oils is n-paraffin.
Gas chromatographic profile of n-paraffin
Modify the figures of the gas chromatographic profiles as follows:
— |
for all of them, after ‘SIMDIS ASTM D 2887 Extended’ add ‘equivalent to ISO 3924’; |
— |
for the figures concerning jet fuel type A-1 and low aromatic kerosene, delete ‘ASTM D 86 correlation (STP 577)-distribution’, and replace it with ‘EN ISO 3405 equivalent to ASTM D 86 correlation (STP 577)-distribution’. |
Page 123
Table of characteristics of fuel oils
Insert the following text:
— |
after ‘sulphated residue content’, insert ‘(ISO 3987)’; |
— |
after ‘saponification index’, insert ‘(ISO 6293-1 or ISO 6293-2)’. |
2710 19 71 to 2710 19 99
Second phrase:
— |
replace ‘ASTM D 86-67’ with ‘EN ISO 3405’; |
— |
after ‘method’, delete ‘(reapproved 1972)’ and add ‘(equivalent to the ASTM D 86 method)’. |
Page 124
|
Paragraph 2, subparagraph (a):
|
|
Paragraph 2, subparagraph (b): After ‘by the’, delete ‘ASTM D 445 74’ and replace it with ‘EN ISO 3104’. |
|
Paragraph 2, subparagraph (c):
|
Table of characteristics of lubricating and other oils
Insert the following text:
— |
after ‘sulphated residue content’, insert ‘(ISO 3987)’; |
— |
after ‘saponification index’, insert ‘(ISO 6293-1 or ISO 6293-2)’. |
Page 125
2712 90 31 to 2712 90 99
|
Paragraph 1: After ‘ASTM D 938’, insert ‘method equivalent to the ISO 2207’. |
|
Paragraph 2: After ‘at 70 °C’, add ‘by EN ISO 12185’. |
|
Paragraph 3: After ‘ASTM D 217’, insert ‘method equivalent to the ISO 2137’. |
|
Paragraph 4:
|
Page 126
2713 20 00
|
Paragraph 1: After ‘ASTM D 938’, insert ‘method equivalent to the ISO 2207’. |
|
Paragraph 2: After ‘at 70 °C’, add ‘by EN ISO 12185’. |
|
Paragraph 3: After ‘by the’, delete ‘ASTM D 5’ and replace it with ‘EN 1426’. |
2713 90 10 and 2713 90 90
|
Paragraph 2: Between ‘at 15 °C’ and ‘exceeds’ add ‘by EN ISO 12185’. |
|
Paragraph 3:
|
Page 127
2715 00 00
|
Paragraph 2, subparagraph (a), fifth phrase, first indent: After ‘measured by the’, delete ‘ASTM D 5’ and replace it with ‘EN 1426’. |
|
Paragraph 2, subparagraph (a), fifth phrase, second indent:
|
Diagram
Modify the diagram as follows:
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/25 |
New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
2011/C 189/07
National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Monaco
Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), the Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.
Issuing country: Monaco
Subject of commemoration: The wedding of Prince Albert and Charlene
Description of the design: The inner part of the coin shows, at the centre, the effigies of Prince Albert and Charlene. At the bottom, the name of the issuing country ‘MONACO’ and the year of issuance ‘2011’. The mint mark and the mint engravers mark appear before and after ‘MONACO 2011’, respectively.
The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.
Number of coins to be issued:
Date of issue:
(1) See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.
(2) See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).
NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/26 |
Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001
2011/C 189/08
Aid No: SA.33191 (11/XA)
Member State: Slovenia
Region: Gorenjska
Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving an individual aid: Podpore programom razvoja podeželja v Občini Jesenice 2011–2013
Legal basis: Pravilnik o dodelitvi pomoči za ohranjanje in razvoj kmetijstva, gozdarstva in podeželja v Občini Jesenice (Uradni list RS, št. 45/11, z dne 10. junija 2011)
Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company:
|
Overall amount of the ad hoc aid awarded to the undertaking: EUR 0,09 million |
|
Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme: EUR 0,03 million |
Maximum aid intensity: 100 %
Date of implementation: —
Duration of scheme or individual aid award: 18 June 2011-31 December 2013
Objective of aid: Investment in agricultural holdings (Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006), Conservation of traditional landscapes and buildings (Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006), Insurance premiums (Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006), Land reparcelling (Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006), Technical support (Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006)
Sector(s) concerned: Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities
Name and address of the granting authority:
Občina Jesenice |
Cesta železarjev 6 |
SI-4270 Jesenice |
SLOVENIJA |
Website: http://www.uradni-list.si/1/objava.jsp?urlid=201145&objava=2127
Other information: —
Aid No: SA.33194 (11/XA)
Member State: Cyprus
Region: —
Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving an individual aid: Σχέδιο Ελέγχου Τρομώδους Νόσου Αιγοπροβάτων
Legal basis: Άρθρο 03525 του Προϋπολογισμού για το 2011
Άρθρο 03619 του Προϋπολογισμού για το 2011
Ο περί της Εφαρμογής Κοινοτικών Κανονισμών στον Τομέα της Κτηνιατρικής Νόμος του 2004
Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company: Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme: EUR 1,67 million
Maximum aid intensity: 100 %
Date of implementation: —
Duration of scheme or individual aid award: 22 June 2011-31 December 2011
Objective of aid: Animal diseases (Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006)
Sector(s) concerned: Raising of sheep and goats
Name and address of the granting authority:
Κτηνιατρικές Υπηρεσίες, Υπουργείο Γεωργίας, Φυσικών Πόρων και Περιβάλλοντος |
1471 Λευκωσία/Nicosia |
ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/CYPRUS |
Website: http://www.moa.gov.cy/moa/vs/vs.nsf/All/74A7A97B0ECC4F01422578B2001F77CE/$file/scrapie%202011b.pdf
Other information: —
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/28 |
Publication pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions
2011/C 189/09
The High Court of Ireland
IN THE MATTER OF IRISH LIFE AND PERMANENT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY (‘IL&P’) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CREDIT INSTITUTIONS (STABILISATION) ACT 2010 (‘THE ACT’)
The High Court of Ireland did on 9 June 2011 make a direction order pursuant to Section 9 of the Act in the following terms:
Directing IL&P (being a credit institution licensed in Ireland) to take certain steps in connection with the preparation for the possible disposal of some or all of the business and assets of Irish Life Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of IL&P, either by way of initial public offering or private sale thereof.
The Court did declare inter alia that the direction order and each part of it is a reorganisation measure for the purposes of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001.
Pursuant to Section 11 of the Act, an application may be made for the setting aside of the direction order on the conditions set out therein, to the High Court of Ireland, at the Four Courts, Inns Quay, Dublin 7, Ireland not later than five working days after the making of the direction order.
Pursuant to Section 64(2) of the Act, no appeal lies from the direction order to the Supreme Court without leave of the High Court.
Full copies of the order are available from the Central Office of the High Court by e-mail to listroomhighcourt@courts.ie
V Announcements
PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY
European Commission
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/29 |
Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6172 — Daimler/Rolls-Royce/Tognum/Bergen)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 189/10
1. |
On 17 June 2011, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Daimler AG (‘Daimler’, Germany) and Rolls-Royce Group plc (‘Rolls-Royce’, United Kingdom), via Engine Holding GmbH (Germany), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint indirect control over Tognum AG (‘Tognum’, Germany) and over Rolls-Royce’s Bergen business (‘Bergen’, Norway) by way of a purchase of shares. |
2. |
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
|
3. |
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
4. |
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission. Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6172 — Daimler/Rolls-Royce/Tognum/Bergen, to the following address:
|
(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/31 |
Summary of Commission Decision
of 3 May 2011
waiving certain commitments in Decision 98/526/EC in Case IV/M.950 — Hoffmann-La Roche/Boehringer Mannheim with respect to the DNA probes market
(Case IV/M.950 — Hoffmann-La Roche/Boehringer Mannheim)
(notified under document C(2011) 2981 final)
(Only the English version is authentic)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 189/11
On 3 May 2011, the Commission adopted a Decision in a merger case under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (1), and in particular Article 8(2) of that Regulation. A non-confidential version of the full Decision can be found in the authentic language of the case and in the working languages of the Commission on the website of the Directorate-General for Competition, at the following address:
http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/index_en.html
I. EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
(1) |
On 4 February 1998, the Commission adopted a Decision in Case IV/M.950 Hoffmann-La Roche/Boehringer Mannheim (‘the Decision’) declaring the operation by which the undertaking Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (‘Roche’, Switzerland) acquired, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89, control of the undertaking Boehringer Mannheim (‘BM’, Germany) compatible with the common market, subject to conditions and obligations. |
(2) |
The Decision stated that Roche had a dominant position in the EEA-wide market for DNA probes that could be strengthened as a result of the acquisition of control over BM given that BM was a potential entrant having invested substantial efforts in positioning itself on the DNA probes market. Roche submitted commitments made binding in the Decision. |
(3) |
Part of these commitments consisted in Roche granting access to its polymerase chain reaction (‘PCR’) technology to all interested market participants on a non-discriminatory basis under the terms of ‘broad’ and ‘targeted’ licences. |
(4) |
The commitments in the Decision did not include any time framework, deadline or review clause. |
(5) |
On 24 September 2008, Roche addressed to DG COMP a request for the waiver of the commitments. |
(6) |
DG COMP's investigation shows that since the adoption of the Decision Roche has granted 35 PCR licences under the scope of the commitments, including ‘broad licences’ granted to some of its main competitors. This has led to the increase in the number of significant players active on the EEA DNA probes market. In addition, most of the 119 PCR-related patents, to which Roche undertook to grant access on the basis of the commitments (including the foundational patents), have expired. |
(7) |
Interested third parties have been consulted. The results of the consultation show that the waiver of the commitments cannot affect their effectiveness as they have fulfilled their role (i.e. compensate the lost of potential competition resulting from the acquisition of BM by Roche), they do not longer reflect the market needs and their waiver has a neutral effect on the rights of third parties. |
(8) |
Furthermore, Roche has recently granted a number of licences outside the commitments and has thereby demonstrated that it is prepared to grant licences absent the obligation to do so. |
II. CONCLUSION
In view of the above the draft decision waives the commitments relating to DNA probes set out in Part VI-B of Decision 98/526/EC with effect from the date of the adoption of the Decision.
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/32 |
Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6291 — CD&R Fund VIII/SPIE)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 189/12
1. |
On 23 June 2011, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VIII, LP having its seat in the Cayman Islands and belonging to the Clayton, Dubilier & Rice group (‘CD&R’, United States) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Financière SPIE SAS (‘SPIE’, France) by way of purchase of shares. |
2. |
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
|
3. |
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice. |
4. |
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission. Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6291 — CD&R Fund VIII/SPIE, to the following address:
|
(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).
(2) OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).
OTHER ACTS
European Commission
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/33 |
Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs
2011/C 189/13
This publication confers the right to object to the application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 (1). Statements of objection must reach the Commission within six months of the date of this publication.
SINGLE DOCUMENT
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006
‘RHEINISCHES ZUCKERRÜBENKRAUT/RHEINISCHER ZUCKERRÜBENSIRUP/RHEINISCHES RÜBENKRAUT’
EC No: DE-PGI-0005-0717-02.09.2008
PGI ( X ) PDO ( )
1. Name:
‘Rheinisches Zuckerrübenkraut/Rheinischer Zuckerrübensirup/Rheinisches Rübenkraut’
2. Member State or third country:
Germany
3. Description of the agricultural product or foodstuff:
3.1. Type of product:
Class 1.6 |
Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed |
3.2. Description of product to which the name in (1) applies:
The pure, natural, concentrated juice of freshly-harvested sugar beet with no vegetable fibre or any other additive.
—
—
—
—
|
Sucrose: 33 % |
|
Glucose: 17 % |
|
Fructose: 16 % |
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— Reception of good/quality: delivery of freshly harvested beets.
— Acceptance testing: determination of the sugar content to define the necessary operational parameters (temperature, duration of cooking process, etc.). Visual inspection for soil and foliage.
— Storage: short period of storage both on the farm and at the production site, coordination of harvesting and delivery.
— Treatment prior to further processing: pre-cleaning; removal of foliage, earth and stones; subsequent cleaning in the sugar beet washer.
— Processing: Processing takes places in the geographical area. The beets are processed whole or cut up. The mash is heated for several hours and boiled gently. Care must be taken to allow the mash sufficient time to rest. The length of time during which the beets are boiled and the temperature depend on the company’s tradition. The syrup is then extracted under high pressure to obtain the raw juice. Filter equipment is used to remove nearly all the solid particles from the raw juice extracted. The clear juice is sent on to the evaporation unit where the water is gently removed from it in a vacuum. The dry matter content of the final product is at least 78 °Brix. Prior to storage, the pH, colour, sucrose, fructose, glucose and dry substance of the final product are analysed in the processing plant. The final product is also regularly examined by an external laboratory. The sugar beet syrup obtained is stored in tanks from where it can be taken for packaging.
3.3. Raw materials (for processed products only):
Without exception, all of the sugar beet used as a raw material must come from the geographical area in question.
Traditionally, the sugar beet used to make sugar beet syrup comes solely from the beet producers in the region.
3.4. Feed (for products of animal origin only):
—
3.5. Specific steps in production that must take place in the identified geographical area:
The entire production process takes place within the geographical area.
3.6. Specific rules concerning slicing, grating, packaging, etc.:
—
3.7. Specific rules concerning labelling:
—
4. Concise definition of the geographical area:
The Rhineland. In the state of North Rhine-Westphalia this includes the government regions of Cologne (without the Oberbergisch district) and the following districts in the government region of Düsseldorf: Mettmann, Düsseldorf City, Rhine District of Neuss, Mönchengladbach City, Viersen, Krefeld City, Cleves District and Wesel District. In the State of Rhineland-Palatinate, it includes the rural districts of Ahrweiler and Mayen-Koblenz.
5. Link with the geographical area:
5.1. Specificity of the geographical area:
The centuries-old Rhineland tradition of syrup-making has resulted in the perfection of production process and taste. The relevant skills have been passed on from generation to generation. In the 14th and 15th centuries, sugar beet became firmly established as a farmed crop. In the Rhineland, the beets were one of the tithes which farmers had to pay to their feudal lords from the 15th century on. In the early 17th century, the Thirty Years’ War gave rise to a period of starvation; cultivating beets proved to be easier and more productive than growing cereals. In the Rhineland, among other places where the unrest had less of an effect, people could invest the time and effort required in cultivating these sweet, white beets.
Today, it is impossible to state when precisely the production of beet syrup began in the Rhineland, but it has probably been common since the 18th century. The centre of ‘Rübenkraut’ production is the Lower Rhine region. Around 1860, the district of Grevenbroich alone had some 63 registered presses (at the time, there were 309 syrup producers in the Prussian State). Initially, the beet syrup was made from mangelwurzels or carrots. In the 19th century, however, the ‘Lanker Rübe’, a type of mangelwurzel grown in the Lower Rhine region, became established. In the latter part of the century, sugar beets became the more popular raw material. Records from around 1870 belonging to the chamber of commerce in Cologne show that between 6 000 and 10 000Zehntner (= 300 and 500 tonnes) of beet syrup was produced every year.
Furthermore, beet syrup appears as an important, traditional ingredient in a range of typically Rhenish recipes, e.g. for the marinated beef dish ‘Rheinischer Sauerbraten’ and ‘Aachener Printen’ gingerbread. The long tradition of sugar beet syrup production in the Rhineland is also very apparent in the local language: people from the Rhineland call it ‘Rübenkraut’ (in olden times ‘Rüöwenkrut’ or ‘Röbenkraut’). Even outside the Rhineland, this term is still used and understood. Before it was known that they could be used to produce sugar, mangelwurzels were used as vegetables. The name ‘Rübenkraut’ was given to the syrup made from mangelwurzels, drawing on the word ‘Apfelkraut’ which was the name given to a syrup made from apples.
Figure 2 in a publication by Block entitled Rübensirup — Seine Herstellung, Beurteilung und Verwendung (‘Beet syrup — its production, assessment and use’), Leipzig 1920, shows that there was a concentration of beet syrup factories (blacked-in circles) in the Rhineland. Sugar factories were widely spread throughout the German Empire, but were few and far between in the Rhineland. However, the Rhineland made up for this with its unrivalled concentration of beet juice factories. Even today, beet juice is still produced in large quantities in the Rhineland.
5.2. Specificity of the product:
The careful production method, firmly rooted in the region through tradition, guarantees that the finished product retains valuable minerals such as magnesium and iron. The product also contains potassium and folic acid. It is made without any additives.
— |
As a result of its incomparable, markedly sweet and malty taste which, like its sweet, malty and caramelly smell, is the result of the careful production method, it is eminently suitable for use not only as a spread but also as a taste-inducing additive in cooking and baking. |
For a long time now, the product has enjoyed great renown and a very good reputation, particularly in the Rhineland but also beyond its borders. The renown and reputation enjoyed by the product stem from its long history in the geographical area.
5.3. Causal link between the geographical area and a specific quality, the reputation or other characteristic of the product:
The excellent reputation enjoyed by the product stems from its geographical origin.
‘Rübenkraut’ was invented in the Rhineland and has been produced there ever since. It has always been made with sugar beet from the Rhineland. The fact that the beets originate from the production area is one key reason why the product enjoys such a good reputation. It is this local sourcing of the sole raw material (sugar beet) which is inextricably linked to the product's authenticity.
Today the beet syrup is still made in almost exactly the same way as in bygone centuries. Only beets from the geographical area were processed. That is also why there is such a concentration of beet juice factories in the Rhineland (see map). Large quantities of sugar beet are still grown in the Rhineland — most are used for sugar production, but a significant quantity all the same is processed to make ‘Rübenkraut’.
Traditionally, the sugar beet used to make sugar beet syrup comes solely from the beet producers in the region. Sugar beet is cultivated on the basis of a contractual arrangement between processors and farmers, thus facilitating comprehensive farming advice. Cooperation between producers and processors is now streamlined, transparent and accountable. A sales guarantee ensures that beet growers have the basic security they need to plan for the future. The chemical quality of the sugar beets is checked routinely by means of identical analytical procedures.
Reference to publication of the specification:
(Article 5(7) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006)
Markenblatt Vol. 5 of 1 February 2008, Part 7a-aa, p. 26285
http://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/geo/detail.pdfdownload/83
(1) OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/37 |
Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs
2011/C 189/14
This publication confers the right to object to the amendment application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 (1). Statements of objection must reach the Commission within six months of the date of this publication.
SINGLE DOCUMENT
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006
‘MELON DE GUADELOUPE’
EC No: FR-PGI-0005-0844-18.01.2011
PGI ( X ) PDO ( )
1. Name:
‘Melon de Guadeloupe’
2. Member State or third country:
France
3. Description of the agricultural product or foodstuff:
3.1. Type of product:
Class 1.6. |
Fruit and cereals, fresh or processed |
3.2. Description of product to which the name in (1) applies:
This melon is a seasonal product, harvested in the period from November to June and cultivated in an open undivided field (without covering or shelter).
The ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’ is a yellow Charentais melon, whole, fresh and firm in appearance, of at least 450 g in weight.
It has a greenish, yellowish or yellow rind. When fully ripe, it has an oily ring or slight cracks at its point of attachment to the stalk.
The melon may have slight defects of form, colour or rind, provided that they do not affect the general appearance of the product, its quality, keeping quality and presentation.
The ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’ is very sweet. It must have a refractive index of at least 12 °Brix.
It is characterised by a sweet taste with a multiplicity of aromas, lots of flavour and a tender flesh. The flesh is orange in colour and keeps especially well.
The producers' organisation carries out annual selection tests on the yellow Charentais varieties listed in the Official Catalogue of species and varieties and selects those melons adapted to local conditions and able to produce the characteristics expected of a ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’. Only the varieties which pass the introductory test and confirmation test may be used.
3.3. Raw materials (for processed products only):
—
3.4. Feed (for products of animal origin only):
—
3.5. Specific steps in production that must take place in the defined geographical area:
The cultivation and harvesting operations take place in the geographical area.
3.6. Specific rules concerning slicing, grating, packaging, etc.:
The transit period between the harvest of the melon and its arrival at the depot is at most four hours. At the depots, the batches of melons are graded and then washed, followed by manual sorting of the fruits one by one in accordance with the specification.
The melons are placed in individual packages and/or on trays (in a single layer).
3.7. Specific rules on labelling:
Each package must indicate the following:
— |
the name of the PGI ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’, |
— |
the PGI logo. |
A sticker with the words ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’ must be affixed to each fruit.
4. Concise definition of the geographical area:
The geographical area consists of 10 of Guadeloupe's municipalities, which are distributed between the two ‘islands’ of the archipelago:
— |
municipalities on La Grande-Terre: Saint François, Sainte Anne, Le Moule, Morne à L’eau, Petit Canal, Anse Bertrand, Port Louis, |
— |
municipalities on the island of Marie-Galante: Grand Bourg, Capesterre, Saint Louis. |
This area, corresponding to that in which the ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’ is produced, is characterised by particular soil and climatic conditions favouring the production of high-quality melons.
5. Link with geographical area:
5.1. Specificity of the geographical area:
Guadeloupe is located in the tropics, and experiences a dry season (or ‘carême’) which lasts in general from December to April. Nevertheless the days are predominantly sunny from November to June.
The geographical area is located on the Atlantic side of Grande-Terre and on Marie-Galante, well-aerated regions where less rain falls than in the interior. By virtue of their aspect, these areas are healthier and experience fewer parasitic infestations than other regions in Guadeloupe.
Grande-Terre and Marie-Galante consist of a coralline limestone platform which at some time in the past was raised up and covered by volcanic discharges, resulting in a characteristic soil.
The area in which melons are cultivated is characterised by swelling clay soils arranged in toposequences made up of more or less thick and stony vertisols and calcimagnesic soils. The swelling clay gives these soils a very high cation exchange capacity, generally saturated, mainly by calcium. The ratio of calcium to magnesium is optimal for the melons. Potassium is retained well in the soil, and the phosphorus is generally not retrograde. The soils have a neutral or slightly basic pH and, as a result of the presence of minerals, are highly fertile. The abundance of exchangeable calcium means that, despite the fact that they are rich in swelling clays, these soils are structurally very stable.
Given that the clay remains flocculated, the soils are, on the one hand, not easily erodible in spite of the intensity of the tropical rains, and, on the other hand, contain a significant stock of water in very stable tubular micropores of biological origin. These soil properties, favourable to the melons, are durable, provided that the soil is not worked excessively.
Although the melon has been cultivated in Guadeloupe since the 17th century, when it was imported by the colonialists, documentary evidence of the melon's presence on the local market dates only from the Second World War.
Production of the melon in Guadeloupe started to become more organised at the end of the 1970s and the start of the 1980s, under the auspices of Mr Etienne CRANE. Two-way export agreements were concluded with economic groupings in metropolitan France, with the melon among the products selected.
Since 1984, Messrs CRANE, BOYER and FABRE have cooperated to produce and export the melon with the ‘Label Guadeloupe’ out of season. The melon is transported by air to metropolitan France on the same day that it is harvested, and sold the following day. The development strategy for the melon essentially involves producing it out of the European season, i.e. from January to May.
The production techniques, oriented towards attaining a high-quality product (choice of varieties, optimum time of harvesting, reasonable fertilisation levels, wise use of irrigation, highly discriminating selection of fruits at packaging time), have become widespread and are being used by more and more operators.
The ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’ has made inroads into the French and European markets since the end of the 1980s. Following a surge from 1989, production has stabilised at around 7 500 to 8 000 tonnes overall.
Today five marketing organisations operate in the melon sector. Today the melon is Guadeloupe's third most important export product after bananas and sugar cane.
5.2. Specificity of the product:
The melon which the producers of Guadeloupe have chosen to cultivate is a yellow Charentais melon. Of all the various types of melon, it is this one which best encapsulates the particularities of the locality in which it is grown. These melons, apart from their high sugar content, possess exceptional flavours and aromas and, in the case of some varieties, a musky taste. It is the fruits produced by the producers of Guadeloupe which are most highly prized by melon lovers.
The particular nature of the climate of Guadeloupe is such that many varieties that grow well in temperate regions are not able to adapt to the conditions in Guadeloupe. Therefore, the melon producers of Guadeloupe select those varieties of yellow Charentais melon whose characteristics are best brought out in Guadeloupe. The selection process also involves a tasting session: the aromas of the melon and the colour and texture of the flesh are therefore all taken into account.
A survey of wholesalers and retailers who purchase ‘Melons de Guadeloupe’ confirms that the melons are perceived as being of excellent quality, regular in shape, able to keep well and aromatic, which distinguishes them from melons originating elsewhere which are sold concurrently.
The ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’ is characterised by a sweet flavour with a multiplicity of aromas, lots of flavour and tender flesh. The flesh of the melon keeps particularly well. The minimum sugar content is set at 12 °Brix.
Expertise evident in a method of cultivation adapted to local conditions
The producers have chosen to practise solely open-field cultivation, without shelter, so that the melons derive the greatest possible benefit from the soil and climate of Guadeloupe. The producers have also chosen to grow their melons during the optimum period for the aromas of the fruits to express themselves, i.e. during the driest season of the year, although melon production is possible the whole year round.
They have adapted the way they work the soil to the potential offered by the environment. To preserve the qualities (stability, water reserve, etc.) of the special soils on Grande-Terre and Marie-Galante favourable for growing melons, working of the soil is restricted and may be performed only when the soil is dry. These practices are therefore set out in the specification.
In addition, the producers have for several years made efforts to use fertiliser and irrigation more rationally and limit their use of chemical herbicides, so as to protect soil and water resources in the localities concerned. These aspects of the cultivation techniques are stipulated in the specifications.
Reputation of the ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’
Since as early as the end of the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s several press articles have referred to the reputation of the ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’, which is an acknowledged high-quality ‘out-of-season’ fruit (in European terms).
The ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’ has made inroads into the French and European markets since the end of the 1980s. Today the out-of-season ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’ stands alone, is globally recognised and is maintaining its market position.
Therefore, for the French Antilles the reference price for out-of-season melons on the price list of the Rungis International Market is based on melons originating from Guadeloupe, reflecting the fact that melons from Guadeloupe are more widely known, partly because of their volume of production, but also because of their quality.
The ‘Melons de Guadeloupe’ are generally rated more highly than melons originating elsewhere at the same time, as the market recognises their high quality and reputation. This has been confirmed by a study on the sale prices of Charentais melons of various origins at the Rungis International Market from 2000 to 2006.
5.3. Causal link between the geographical area and the quality or characteristics of the product (for PDO) or a specific quality, the reputation or other characteristic of the product (for PGI):
The climate prevailing over Guadeloupe during the dry season (‘carême’) and the clay-limestone soil of Grande-Terre and Marie-Galante are conducive to the natural production of high-quality melons in open fields. Because of their dry and well-aerated climate, proximity to the sea (which dampens down excessive heat and limits plant diseases) and clay-limestone soil, Grande-Terre and Marie-Galante favour the production of sweet melons with many special aromas. Furthermore, the presence of a significant amount of calcium in the soil leads to the production of fruits which characteristically keep exceptionally well. The land is particularly conducive to growing yellow Charentais melons with either a smooth or reticulated rind, and each type can develop to its maximum potential in terms of aromas, flavour, rind colour and taste.
The requisite quality of the melon can be attained only if care is taken not to rush anything, whether it be the rotation of melon beds, the various ways of preparing the soil, the way water or fertiliser is supplied at each growth stage of the plant and the way the cultivar is produced. Therefore, it is the expertise of the producers, as much in the working of the soil as in the upkeep of the melon beds and the daily harvest of fruit which helps achieve optimum quality. A manual, tactile, visual, careful and highly discriminating selection process has raised the profile of the ‘Melon de Guadeloupe’ to a high level, leading to it being appreciated today by all its European distributors for its ability to keep exceptionally well after harvest, its richness in sugar and its aromas and, consequently, its particularities when compared with melons of other origins on sale at the same time.
Reference to publication of the specification:
(Article 5(7) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006)
https://www.inao.gouv.fr/fichier/CDCIGPMelonDeGuadeloupe.pdf
(1) OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.
29.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/42 |
Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs
2011/C 189/15
This publication confers the right to object to the application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 (1). Statements of objection must reach the Commission within six months of the date of this publication.
SINGLE DOCUMENT
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006
‘SEL DE GUÉRANDE/FLEUR DE SEL DE GUÉRANDE’
EC No: FR-PGI-0005-0861-22.02.2011
PGI ( X ) PDO ( )
1. Name:
‘Sel de Guérande/Fleur de sel de Guérande’
2. Member State or third country:
France
3. Description of the agricultural product or foodstuff:
3.1. Type of product:
Class 1.8. |
Other products of Annex I to the Treaty (spices, etc.) |
3.2. Description of the product to which the name in point 1 applies:
‘Sel de Guérande’ and ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ are hand-harvested sea salts originating exclusively from the salt marshes of the Guérande peninsula. They are unrefined, unwashed and additive-free sea salts. They mainly consist of sodium chloride crystals, but also naturally contain other mineral salts and trace elements.
The production of ‘Sel de Guérande’ and ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ is based on a natural process of concentration of salt in sea water, which circulates through a series of pools until it reaches the point of crystallisation in the final basin, the crystalliser or salt pan.
3.2.1. ‘
’‘Sel de Guérande’ is a grey sea salt consisting of salt crystals which form on the natural clay base of the salt pan. It is harvested by hand from the brine in the salt pan using a special tool. After storage and sorting, the ‘Sel de Guérande’ salt can be packaged either as it is, or after drying or grinding, in order to obtain salts of different granule sizes and moistness.
3.2.2. ‘
’‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ is formed of light, fine, brittle crystals which, under favourable climatic conditions (wind and sun), form on the surface of the brine in the salt pans producing grey salt. The fleur de sel (salt blossom) is harvested by hand by skimming the surface of the salt pan using a special tool, before it can sink to the bottom of the pool, where it is no longer harvested as salt blossom.
The salt blossom differs from grey salt as it crystallises on the surface of the salt pans and is white in colour (it has no contact with the base of the salt pans). After storage and sorting, it is packaged either as it is, or after partial drying to improve its flow.
3.3. Raw materials (for processed products only):
Not applicable.
3.4. Feed (for products of animal origin only):
Not applicable.
3.5. Specific steps in production that must take place in the defined geographical area:
Processes which take place in the geographical area are:
— |
the harvesting of the ‘Sel de Guérande’ or the ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ salt, |
— |
the bulk storage of the ‘Sel de Guérande’ or the ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ salt, |
— |
the first packaging process which allows the products to be traced if they are re-packaged at a later date outside the geographical area. |
3.6. Specific rules concerning slicing, grating, packaging, etc.:
Not applicable.
3.7. Specific rules on labelling:
‘Sel de Guérande’ and ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ salt must be kept in sealed packaging. The labelling must indicate:
— |
the name of the PGI: ‘Sel de Guérande’ for the grey salt and products formed by drying or grinding grey salt, and ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ for the salt-blossom salt, |
— |
the PGI logo and/or indication of the ‘Protected Geographical Indication’, |
— |
the name and address of the organisation responsible for the protection and management of the PGI. |
4. Concise definition of the geographical area:
The defined geographical area covers 39 communes of the Loire region (Loire-Atlantique) and 7 communes of Morbihan (Brittany).
Departments |
Communes |
Loire-Atlantique (39 communes) |
Asserac Batz-sur-Mer Baule-Escoublac (LA) Besne Bouée Campbon Chapelle-des-Marais (LA) Chapelle Launay (LA) Croisic (LE) Crossac Donges Drefféac Guenrouët Guérande Herbignac Lavau-sur-Loire Malville Mesquer Missillac Montoir-de-Bretagne Piriac-sur-Mer Pont-Château Pornichet Pouliguen (LE) Prinquiau Quilly Saint-André-des-Eaux Saint-Gildas-des-Bois Saint-Joachim Saint-Lyphard Saint-Malo-de-Guersac Saint-Molf Saint-Nazaire Sainte-Anne-sur-Brivet Sainte-Reine-de-Bretagne Savenay Sévérac Trignac Turballe (LA) |
Morbihan (7 communes) |
Camoël Férel Nivillac Pénestin Roche-Bernard (LA) Saint-Dolay Théhillac |
5. Link with geographical area:
5.1. Specificity of the geographical area:
The specificity of the area is based on its climatic conditions: the presence of wind and sun, and an oceanic climate with mild winters and cool summers.
It is also based on soil type. The formation of coastal salt marshes requires large clay stretches situated at the limits of the highest tides and sheltered from the effects of the swell. The Guérande salt marshes are situated behind the sandbanks. The clay content of the soils (which makes them impermeable and malleable) has allowed the construction of man-made salt marshes.
The specificity of the area also comes from human factors and the way in which is it used. The first written records of salt marshes in the Guérande region date from 854 (‘Cartulaire de Redon’). After a growth in the Guérande salt marshes between the 10th and 14th centuries, the number of salt pans increased considerably from the 16th century onwards, peaking in the 19th century. Between 1840 and 1960, there was a decline in the salt marshes. Since 1970, the production of salt in the Guérande basin has been rising once again. The salt marshes and the production techniques which are used are the same as in past centuries. The salt marshes are restored using traditional techniques. A centre for the vocational training of salt producers was created on the Guérande peninsula in 1979.
Because of the variability in production from year to year and for historic and economic reasons, producers and suppliers in the Guérande basin stockpile strategically. Salt storehouses were traditionally situated at the edge of the salt marshes. The geographical area covered by the PGI includes communes where, historically, storage facilities frequented by salt merchants were situated.
5.2. Specificity of the product:
Characteristic properties:
The harvesting method used in the Guérande peninsula salt marches gives ‘Sel de Guérande’ salt and ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ salt their characteristic properties:
|
Physical properties: brittle texture, pale grey colour of the salt (harvested from a shallow layer of brine from the clay base of the salt pans). The ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ salt (which is ‘gathered’ from the surface of the salt pans before the harvesting of the salt) has a natural white colour. |
|
Chemical properties: natural unwashed, unrefined and additive-free salts from the sea, which means they are richer in minerals (magnesium, calcium, potassium) and trace elements, and have a relatively high moisture content. |
|
Organoleptic properties: not bitter or spicy. |
The production method and the historic and current reputation of ‘Sel de Guérande’ salt and ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ salt contribute to the preservation of their particular characteristics.
Specific expertise:
The salt workers of the Guérande peninsula have perfected a production technique based on one of the oldest maritime agricultural systems of the whole of the French Atlantic coast. The structure of the salt marshes is specific to the Guérande basin. The salt worker simultaneously manages the level of the water and its circulation in the different pools to allow a progressive increase in the concentration of salt over several weeks (keeping a concentration in the salt marsh very close to the point of crystallisation), as well as the natural purification of the waters through decanting, and finally the harvest of the products.
The salt blossom is harvested by hand by skimming the surface of the salt pans using a special long-handled wooden rake (in a ‘gathering’ process) before the salt can sink to the bottom of the pan.
For ‘Sel de Guérande’ salt, the crystals are gathered together at the centre of the salt pans, brought towards a special platform at the edge of the salt pan and scraped onto it, using a tool called a ‘las’. The use of the las allows the brine to be stirred and the crystals which have formed at the bottom of the salt pan to be removed, while leaving the clay particles behind.
The nature of the products and their characteristics (they require draining, do not flow easily, and have a rapid uptake of ambient moisture) mean that ‘Sel de Guérande’ salt and ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ salt are products which also require specific skills and knowledge for storage and packaging. In order to deliver the salt-blossom salt, which is drained and as clean as possible, to an operator or packager, producers carry out the initial storage (intermediate storage or pre-storage) and sorting of the product. This intermediate storage takes place on the premises of the producers, who do not necessarily live close to the salt marshes, given the pressure on land space. The boundaries of the PGI area take this into account.
Reputation:
The particular taste and nutritional qualities of ‘Sel de Guérande’ and ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ salt, renowned for centuries, make it the salt of gastronomes. Consumer interest in ‘Sel de Guérande’ and ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ salt is shown by studies and surveys undertaken by commercial marketing organisations and distributors, and many renowned restaurateurs and agri-food businesses have demonstrated their preference for this salt. Hundreds of articles refer to ‘Sel de Guérande’ and/or ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ salt.
The term ‘Sel(s) de Guérande’ has been used since at least 1698. ‘Fleur de sel’ features in publicity dating from the 1930s, but it is since the end of the 1970s that this name has become well known. The reputation of the terms ‘Sel de Guérande’ and ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ spread with the commercial development of these products at the end of the 1980s.
In a market for an extremely common product, ‘Sel de Guérande’ salt has been the pioneer in the salt market sector which today refers to ‘locally produced salt’.
5.3. Causal link between the geographical area and the quality or characteristics of the product (for PDO) or a specific quality, the reputation or other characteristic of the product (for PGI):
The harvesting of ‘Sel de Guérande’ and ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ salt can only be carried out in salt marshes, which are clearly distinguished by their naturally-occurring clay and their location between the high and low points of spring tides. The complexity of the water network and the structure of the salt marshes form essential elements of the Guérande landscape and local knowledge.
The harvesting method used in the Guérande peninsula salt marshes is different from that used in other production areas on the Atlantic coast. This harvesting method is characterised by the use of the changes in tide, the use of three types of pool to encourage the concentration of salt, the frequency of the harvests, the harvesting of salt from the brine, and the non-mechanised harvesting process.
‘Sel de Guérande’ and ‘Fleur de sel de Guérande’ salt can only be stored in bulk in the PGI area, where producers and handlers in the sector have specific knowledge. Initial sealed and labelled packaging carried out in the PGI area before the product leaves it is also essential to guarantee the origin and traceability of the products.
Reference to the publication of the specification:
(Article 5(7) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006)
https://www.inao.gouv.fr/fichier/CDCIGPSelDeGuerandeFleurDeSelDeGuerande.pdf
(1) OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.