ISSN 1725-2423 doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.069.eng |
||
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 69 |
|
English edition |
Information and Notices |
Volume 53 |
Notice No |
Contents |
page |
|
III Preparatory acts |
|
|
Initiatives of the Member States |
|
2010/C 069/01 |
||
2010/C 069/02 |
||
|
IV Notices |
|
|
NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
|
|
Council |
|
2010/C 069/03 |
||
EN |
|
III Preparatory acts
Initiatives of the Member States
18.3.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 69/1 |
Initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the rights to interpretation and to translation in criminal proceedings
(2010/C 69/01)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 82(2)(b) thereof,
Having regard to the resolution of the Council of 30 November 2009 on a Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings (1), in particular to Measure A in the Annex thereof,
Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (2),
Whereas:
(1) |
The European Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice. According to the conclusions of the European Council in Tampere of 15 and 16 October 1999, and in particular point 33 thereof, the principle of mutual recognition should become the cornerstone of judicial cooperation in both civil and criminal matters within the European Union. |
(2) |
On 29 November 2000 the Council, in accordance with the Tampere Conclusions, adopted a programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters (3). The introduction to the programme of measures states that mutual recognition is ‘designed to strengthen cooperation between Member States but also to enhance the protection of individual rights’. |
(3) |
Implementation of the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters presupposes that Member States have trust in each other's criminal justice systems. The extent of the mutual recognition exercise is very much dependent on a number of parameters, which include mechanisms for safeguarding the rights of suspects and common minimum standards necessary to facilitate the application of the principle of mutual recognition. |
(4) |
Mutual recognition can only operate effectively in a spirit of confidence, whereby not only judicial authorities, but all actors in the criminal process see decisions of the judicial authorities of other Member States as equivalent to their own, implying not only trust in the adequacy of one's partners' rules, but also trust that those rules are correctly applied. |
(5) |
Although all Member States are parties to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), experience has shown that this in itself does not always provide a sufficient degree of trust in the criminal justice systems of other Member States. |
(6) |
Article 82(2) of the Treaty provides for the establishment of minimum rules applicable in the Member States so as to facilitate mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions and police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters having a cross-border dimension. Point (b) of Article 82(2) refers to ‘the rights of individuals in criminal procedure’ as one of the areas in which minimum rules may be established. |
(7) |
Common minimum rules should lead to increased confidence in the criminal justice systems of all Member States, which in turn should lead to more efficient judicial cooperation in a climate of mutual trust. Such common minimum rules should be applied in the fields of interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings. |
(8) |
The rights to interpretation and to translation for those who do not understand the language of the proceedings are enshrined in Article 6 of the ECHR, as elaborated upon by the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The provisions of this Directive facilitate the application of those rights in practice. To this end, this Directive intends to ensure the rights of a suspected or accused person to interpretation and to translation in criminal proceedings with a view to safeguarding that person's right to fair proceedings. |
(9) |
The rights provided for in this Directive should also apply to proceedings for the execution of a European Arrest Warrant within the limits provided for by this Directive. Executing Members States should provide, and bear the costs of, interpretation and translation for the benefit of the requested person who does not understand or speak the language of the proceedings. |
(10) |
The provisions of this Directive should ensure that the rights of the suspected or accused person who does not speak or understand the language of the proceedings to understand the suspicions or accusations brought against him and to understand the proceedings in order to be able to exercise his rights are protected by providing free and accurate linguistic assistance. The suspected or accused person should be able, inter alia, to explain to his legal counsel his version of the events, point out any statements with which he disagrees and make his legal counsel aware of any facts that should be put forward in the defence. It is recalled in this connection that the provisions of this Directive set minimum rules. Member States may extend the rights set out in this Directive in order to provide a higher level of protection also in situations not explicitly dealt with in this Directive. The level of protection should never fall below the standards provided by the ECHR, as interpreted in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. |
(11) |
Member States should not be obliged to ensure interpretation of communication between the suspected or accused person and his legal counsel in cases where they can effectively communicate in the same language. Neither should the Member States be obliged to ensure interpretation of such communication where the right to interpretation is clearly used for purposes other than exercising fair trial rights in the proceedings concerned. |
(12) |
The finding that there is no need for interpretation or translation should be subject to the possibility of review, in accordance with national law. Such review may be carried out, for example, through a specific complaint procedure, or in the context of an ordinary appeal procedure against decisions on the merits. |
(13) |
Appropriate assistance should be provided also to suspected or accused persons suffering from hearing impediments. |
(14) |
The duty of care towards suspected or accused persons who are in a potentially weak position, in particular because of physical impairments which affect their ability to communicate effectively, underpins a fair administration of justice. The prosecution, law enforcement and judicial authorities should therefore ensure that these persons are able to exercise effectively the rights provided for in this Directive, for example by paying attention to any potential vulnerability that affects their ability to follow the proceedings and make themselves understood, and by taking appropriate steps to ensure these rights. |
(15) |
Safeguarding the fairness of the proceedings requires that essential documents, or at least the important passages of such documents, be translated for the benefit of the suspected or accused person. It is up to the authorities of the Member States to decide which documents should be translated, in accordance with national law. Some documents should always be considered essential documents that should be translated, such as the decision depriving a person of his liberty, the charge or indictment and any judgment. |
(16) |
A waiver of the right to written translation of documents should be unequivocal, with minimum safeguards, and should not run counter to any important public interest. |
(17) |
This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Directive seeks to promote the right to liberty, the right to a fair trial and the right of defence. |
(18) |
Member States should ensure that the provisions of this Directive, where they correspond to rights guaranteed by the ECHR, are implemented consistently with those of the ECHR as elaborated upon by the relevant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. |
(19) |
Since the objective of this Directive, that is, achieving common minimum standards, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as referred to and defined in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective, |
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Article 1
Scope
1. This Directive lays down rules concerning the rights to interpretation and to translation in criminal proceedings and proceedings for the execution of a European Arrest Warrant.
2. Those rights apply to any person from the time that person is made aware by the competent authorities of a Member State that he is suspected or accused of having committed a criminal offence until the conclusion of the proceedings, which is understood to mean the final determination of the question whether the suspected or accused person has committed the offence.
3. This Directive shall not apply to proceedings which may lead to sanctions being imposed by an authority other than a criminal court, as long as those proceedings are not pending before a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters.
Article 2
Right to interpretation
1. Member States shall ensure that a suspected or accused person who does not understand or speak the language of the criminal proceedings concerned is provided with interpretation into his native language or into another language that he understands, in order to safeguard his right to fair proceedings. Interpretation, including of communications between the suspected or accused person and his legal counsel, shall be provided during criminal proceedings before investigative and judicial authorities, including during police questioning, during all court hearings and during any necessary interim hearings, and may be provided in other situations. This provision does not affect rules of national law concerning the presence of a legal counsel during any stage of the criminal proceedings.
2. Member States shall ensure that a person with a hearing impediment receives interpretation assistance, if appropriate for that person.
3. Member States shall ensure that it is verified in any appropriate manner, including by consulting the suspected or accused person, whether he understands and speaks the language of the criminal proceedings and needs the assistance of an interpreter.
4. Member States shall ensure that at some stage in the proceedings, in accordance with national law, there is the possibility of a review of a finding that there is no need for interpretation. Such review does not entail the obligation for Member States to provide for a separate mechanism in which the sole ground for review is the challenging of such finding.
5. In proceedings for the execution of a European Arrest Warrant, the executing Member State shall ensure that its competent authorities provide any person subject to such proceedings who does not understand or speak the language of the proceedings, with interpretation in accordance with this Article.
Article 3
Right to translation of essential documents
1. Member States shall ensure that a suspected or accused person who does not understand the language of the criminal proceedings concerned is provided with a translation, into his native language or into another language that he understands, of all documents which are essential in order to safeguard his right to fair proceedings, or at least the important passages of such documents, provided that the person concerned has the right of access to the documents concerned under national law.
2. The competent authorities shall decide which are the essential documents to be translated under paragraph 1. The essential documents to be translated, in whole or the important passages thereof, shall include at least detention orders or equivalent decisions depriving the person of his liberty, the charge or indictment and any judgment, where such documents exist.
3. The suspected or accused person, or his legal counsel, may submit a reasoned request for translation of further documents which are necessary for the effective exercise of the right of defence.
4. Member States shall ensure that at some stage in the proceedings, in accordance with national law, there is the possibility of a review if translation of a document referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 is not provided. Such review does not entail the obligation for Member States to provide for a separate mechanism in which the sole ground for review is the challenging of such finding.
5. In proceedings for the execution of a European Arrest Warrant, the executing Member State shall ensure that its competent authorities provide any person subject to such proceedings who does not understand the language in which the European Arrest Warrant is drawn up, or into which it has been translated by the issuing Member State, with a translation of that document.
6. Provided that this does not affect the fairness of the proceedings, an oral translation or an oral summary of the documents referred to in this Article may, where appropriate, be provided instead of a written translation.
7. A person who has a right under this Article to translation of documents may, at any time, waive this right.
Article 4
Costs of interpretation and translation
Member States shall cover the costs of interpretation and translation resulting from the application of Articles 2 and 3, irrespective of the outcome of the proceedings.
Article 5
Quality of the interpretation and translation
Member States shall take concrete measures to ensure that the interpretation and translation provided shall be of adequate quality so that the suspected or accused person, as well as a person subject to the execution of a European Arrest Warrant, is fully able to exercise his rights.
Article 6
Non-regression clause
Nothing in this Directive shall be construed as limiting or derogating from any of the rights and procedural safeguards that may be ensured under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, under other relevant provisions of international law or under the laws of any Member States which provide a higher level of protection.
Article 7
Implementation
Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Directive by … (4) at the latest.
By the same date Member States shall transmit to the Council and to the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this Directive.
Article 8
Report
The Commission shall, by … (5), submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the extent to which the Member States have taken the necessary measures in order to comply with this Directive, accompanied, if necessary, by legislative proposals.
Article 9
Entry into force
This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Done at Brussels, …
For the European Parliament
The President
…
For the Council
The President
…
(1) OJ C 295, 4.12.2009, p. 1.
(2) Opinion … (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(3) OJ C 12, 15.1.2001, p. 10.
(4) 30 months after the publication of this Directive in the Official Journal.
(5) 42 months after the publication of this Directive in the Official Journal.
18.3.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 69/5 |
Initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Protection Order
(2010/C 69/02)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 82(1)(d) thereof,
Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (1),
Whereas:
(1) |
The European Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice. |
(2) |
Article 82(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides that judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the Union shall be based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions. |
(3) |
According to the Stockholm programme, adopted by the European Council at its meeting on 10 and 11 December 2009, mutual recognition could extend to all types of judgments and decisions of a judicial nature, which may, depending on the legal system, be either criminal or administrative. The programme also points out that victims of crime can be offered special protection measures which should be effective within the Union. |
(4) |
The resolution of the European Parliament of 2 February 2006 on the current situation in combating violence against women and any future actions recommends that Member States formulate a zero-tolerance policy as regards all forms of violence against women and calls on Member States to take appropriate measures to ensure better protection of and support to actual and potential victims. |
(5) |
In a common area of justice without internal borders, it is necessary to ensure that the protection provided to a person in one Member State is maintained and continued in any other Member State to which the person moves or has moved. It should also be ensured that the legitimate exercise by citizens of the Union of their right to move and reside freely within the territory of Member States, in accordance with Article 3(2) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Article 21 of the TFEU, does not result in a loss of their security. |
(6) |
In order to attain these objectives, this Directive should set out rules whereby the protection stemming from a protection measure adopted according to the law of one Member State (‘the issuing State’) can be extended to another Member State to which the protected person moves (‘the executing State’), regardless of the type or duration of the obligations or prohibitions contained in the protection measure concerned. |
(7) |
In order to prevent a new crime being committed against the victim in the executing State, that State should be given a legal basis for recognising the decision previously adopted in the issuing State in favour of the victim, while also avoiding the need for the victim to start new proceedings or to produce the evidence in the executing State again as if the issuing State had not adopted the decision. |
(8) |
This Directive should be applied and enforced in such a way that the protected person receives the same or equivalent protection in the executing State as he would have received if the protection measure had been issued in that State ab initio, thus avoiding any discrimination. |
(9) |
Given that this Directive deals with situations in which the protected person moves to another Member State, executing its provisions does not imply any transfer to the executing State of powers relating to principal, suspended, alternative, conditional or secondary penalties, or relating to security measures imposed on the person causing danger, if the latter continues to reside in the State that issued the protection measure. |
(10) |
Where appropriate, it should be possible to use electronic means with a view to putting into practice the measures adopted in application of this Directive, in accordance with national laws and procedures. |
(11) |
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to protect persons who are in danger, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States acting unilaterally, given the cross-border nature of the situations involved, and could instead, due to the scale and potential effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as referred to in Article 5(3) of the TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in Article 5(4) of the TEU, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective. |
(12) |
This Directive should contribute to the protection of persons who are in danger, thereby complementing the instruments already in place in this field, such as Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions (2), and Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention (3), |
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Article 1
Definitions
For the purposes of this Directive the following definitions shall apply:
1) |
‘European protection order’ means a judicial decision relating to a protection measure issued by a Member State and aiming at facilitating the taking by another Member State, where appropriate, of a protection measure under its own national law with a view to the safeguard of the life, physical and psychological integrity, freedom or sexual integrity of a person. |
2) |
‘Protection measure’ means a decision adopted by a competent authority of a Member State imposing on a person causing danger one or more of the obligations or prohibitions referred to in Article 2(2), provided that the infringement of such obligations or prohibitions constitutes a criminal offence under the law of the Member State concerned or may otherwise be punishable by a deprivation of liberty in that Member State. |
3) |
‘Protected person’ means the person whose life, physical and psychological integrity, freedom, or sexual integrity are the object of the protection stemming from a protection measure adopted by the issuing State. |
4) |
‘Person causing danger’ means the person on whom one or more of the obligations or prohibitions, referred to in Article 2(2), have been imposed. |
5) |
‘Issuing State’ means the Member State in which a protection measure has been originally adopted, constituting the basis for issuing a European protection order. |
6) |
‘Executing State’ means the Member State to which a European protection order has been forwarded with a view to its recognition. |
7) |
‘State of supervision’ means the Member State to which a judgment, as defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, or a decision on supervision measures, as defined in Article 4 of Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA, has been transferred. |
Article 2
Scope of the European protection order
1. A European protection order may be issued at any moment when the protected person intends to leave or has left the issuing State for another Member State.
2. The European protection order shall only be issued when a protection measure has been previously adopted in the issuing State, imposing on the person causing danger one or more of the following obligations or prohibitions:
(a) |
an obligation not to enter certain localities, places or defined areas where the protected person resides or that he visits; |
(b) |
an obligation to remain in a specified place, where applicable during specified times; |
(c) |
an obligation containing limitations on leaving the territory of the issuing State; |
(d) |
an obligation to avoid contact with the protected person; or |
(e) |
a prohibition on approaching the protected person closer than a prescribed distance. |
Article 3
Obligation to recognise the European protection order
1. Member States shall recognise any European protection order in accordance with the provisions of this Directive.
2. This Directive shall not have the effect of modifying the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Article 6 of the TEU.
Article 4
Designation of competent authorities
1. Each Member State shall inform the General Secretariat of the Council which judicial authority or authorities are competent under its national law to issue a European protection order and to recognise such an order, in accordance with this Directive, when that Member State is the issuing State or the executing State.
2. By derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may designate non-judicial authorities as the competent authorities for taking decisions under this Directive, provided that such authorities have the competence to take decisions of a similar nature under their national law and procedures.
3. The General Secretariat of the Council shall make the information received available to all Member States and to the Commission.
Article 5
Issue of a European protection order
1. On the basis of a protection measure adopted in the issuing State, a judicial authority of that State, or another competent authority referred to in Article 4(2), shall, only at the request of the protected person, issue a European protection order, after verifying that the protection measure meets all the requirements set out in Article 3(1).
2. The protected person or his legal representative may submit a request for the issuance of a European protection order either to the competent authority of the issuing State or to the competent authority of the executing State.
If such a request is submitted in the executing State, its competent authority shall transfer this request as soon as possible to the competent authority of the issuing State in order, where appropriate, to issue the European protection order.
3. The authority which adopts a protection measure containing one or more of the obligations referred to in Article 2(2) shall inform the protected person about the possibility of requesting a European protection order when he intends to move to another Member State. The authority shall advise the protected person to submit the application before leaving the territory of the issuing State.
Article 6
Form and content of the European protection order
The European protection order shall be in accordance with the form set out in Annex I to this Directive. It shall in particular contain the following information:
(a) |
the identity and nationality of the protected person, as well as the identity and nationality of the person's legal representative if the protected person is a minor or is legally incapacitated; |
(b) |
the use of any technological instruments, if any, that have been provided to the protected person to carry out the immediate enforcement of the protection measure, where appropriate; |
(c) |
the name, address, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail address of the competent authority of the issuing State; |
(d) |
the identification of the protection measure on the basis of which the European protection order is adopted; |
(e) |
a summary of the facts and circumstances which have led to the imposition of the protection measure in the issuing State; |
(f) |
the obligations or prohibitions imposed in the protection measure underlying the European protection order on the person causing danger, their length and the express indication that their infringement constitutes a criminal offence under the law of the issuing State or may otherwise be punishable by a deprivation of liberty; |
(g) |
the identity and nationality of the person causing a danger; |
(h) |
where appropriate, other circumstances that could have an influence on the assessment of the danger that confronts the protected person; |
(i) |
the express indication, where applicable, that a judgement, as defined by Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, or a decision on supervision measures, as defined by Article 4 of Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA, has already been transferred to another Member State and the identification of the competent authority for the enforcement of such a judgment or decision. |
Article 7
Transmission procedure
1. Where the competent authority of the issuing State transmits the European protection order to the competent authority of the executing State, it shall do so by any means which leaves a written record so as to allow the competent authority of the executing Member State to establish its authenticity.
2. If the competent authority of either the executing or the issuing State is not known to the competent authority of the other State, the latter authority shall make all the relevant enquiries, including via the contact points of the European Judicial Network created by the Council Joint Action 98/428/JHA of 29 June 1998 on the creation of a European Judicial Network (4), the National Member of Eurojust or the National System for the coordination of Eurojust of its State, in order to obtain the required information.
3. When an authority of the executing State which receives a European protection order has no competence to recognise it, that authority shall, ex officio, forward the European protection order to the competent authority.
Article 8
Measures in the executing State
1. The competent authority of the executing State shall:
(a) |
upon receipt of a European protection order transmitted in accordance with Article 7, recognise that order and take, where appropriate, all measures that would be available under its national law in a similar case in order to ensure the protection of the protected person, unless it decides to invoke one of the grounds for non-recognition referred to in Article 9; |
(b) |
inform the person causing danger, where appropriate, of any measure taken in the executing State; |
(c) |
take any urgent and provisional measure needed in order to ensure the continued protection of the protected person; |
(d) |
immediately notify the competent authority of the issuing State and, if the issuing State is different from the State of supervision, the competent authority of the State of supervision, of any breach of the protection measure underlying the European protection order and described therein. Notice shall be given using the standard form set out in Annex II. |
2. The competent authority of the executing State shall inform the competent authority of the issuing State and the protected person about the measures adopted in accordance with this Article.
Article 9
Grounds for non-recognition of a European protection order
1. Grounds shall be given for any refusal to recognise a European protection order.
2. The competent authority of the executing State may refuse to recognise a European protection order in the following circumstances:
(a) |
the European protection order is not complete or has not been completed within the time-limit set by the competent authority of the executing State; |
(b) |
the requirements set out in Article 2(2) have not been met; |
(c) |
the protection derives from the execution of a penalty or measure that is covered by amnesty according to the law of the executing State and relates to an act which falls within its competence according to that law; |
(d) |
there is immunity conferred under the law of the executing State on the person causing danger, which makes it impossible to adopt the protection measures; |
3. In the cases referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 2, and before deciding not to recognise the European protection order, the competent authority of the executing State shall communicate, by appropriate means, with the competent authority of the issuing State and, if necessary, request the latter to supply, without delay, any additional information required.
Article 10
Subsequent decisions in the issuing State
1. The competent authority of the issuing State shall have jurisdiction to take all subsequent decisions relating to the protection measure underlying a European protection order. Such subsequent decisions shall concern notably:
(a) |
the renewal, review and withdrawal of the protection measure; |
(b) |
the modification of the protection measure; |
(c) |
the issuing of an arrest warrant or any other enforceable judicial decision having the same effect; |
(d) |
the initiation of new criminal proceedings against the person causing the danger. |
2. The law of the issuing State shall apply to decisions taken pursuant to paragraph 1.
3. Where a judgment, as defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, or a decision on supervision measures, as defined in Article 4 of Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA, has already been transferred to another Member State, subsequent decisions shall be taken in accordance with the relevant provisions of those Framework Decisions.
Article 11
Grounds for revoking the recognition of a European protection order
The competent authority of the executing State may revoke the recognition of a European protection order where there is evidence that the protected person has definitively left the territory of the executing State.
Article 12
Time limits
1. The European protection order shall be recognised without delay.
2. The competent authority of the executing State shall decide without delay on the adoption of any measure under its national law further to the recognition of a European protection order, in accordance with Article 8.
Article 13
Governing law
Decisions made by the competent authority of the executing State under this Directive shall be governed by its national law.
Article 14
Obligations of the authorities involved
1. Where, in application of Article 10(1)(b), the competent authority of the issuing State has modified the protection measure underlying the European protection order, it shall without delay inform the competent authority of the executing State of such modification. Where appropriate, the competent authority of the executing State shall take the necessary measures in order to give effect to the modified protection measure, if those measures would be available under its national law in a similar case, informing the competent authority of the issuing State, the protected person and, where appropriate, the person causing danger, when the latter is in the territory of the executing State.
2. The competent authority of the issuing State shall without delay inform the competent authority of the executing State and the protected person of the expiry or revocation of the protection measure underlying the European protection order that was issued in the issuing State and, subsequently, of the revocation of the order.
Article 15
Consultations between competent authorities
Where appropriate, the competent authorities of the issuing State and of the executing State may consult each other in order to facilitate the smooth and efficient application of this Directive.
Article 16
Languages
The European protection order shall be translated into the official language or one of the official languages of the executing State.
Any Member State may, either when this Directive is adopted or at a later date, state in a declaration deposited with the General Secretariat of the Council, that it will accept a translation in one or more other official languages of the institutions of the Union.
Article 17
Costs
Costs resulting from the application of this Directive shall be borne by the executing State, except for costs arising exclusively within the territory of the issuing State.
Article 18
Relation to other agreements and arrangements
1. Member States may continue to apply bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements which are in force upon the entry into force of this Directive, insofar as they allow the objectives of this Directive to be extended or enlarged and help to simplify or facilitate further the procedures for taking protection measures.
2. Member States may conclude bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements after the entry into force of this Directive, insofar as they allow the objectives of this Directive to be extended or enlarged and help to simplify or facilitate the procedures for taking protection measures.
3. By … (5), Member States shall notify the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission of the existing agreements and arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 which they wish to continue applying. Member States shall also notify the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission of any new agreements and arrangements as referred to in paragraph 2, within three months of signing such an agreement.
Article 19
Implementation
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Directive by … (6).
2. Member States shall transmit to the General Secretariat of the Council and to the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this Directive.
Article 20
Review
1. By … (7), the Commission shall draw up a report based on the information received from the Member States under Article 19(2).
2. On the basis of this report, the Council shall assess:
(a) |
the extent to which the Member States have taken the necessary measures in order to comply with this Directive, and |
(b) |
the application of this Directive. |
3. The report shall be accompanied, if necessary, by legislative proposals.
Article 21
Entry into force
This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Done at, …
For the European Parliament
The President
…
For the Council
The President
…
(1) Position of the European Parliament of … (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Council Decision of … (not yet published in the Official Journal).
(2) OJ L 337, 16.12.2008, p. 102.
(3) OJ L 294, 11.11.2009, p. 20.
(5) 3 months after the entry into force of this Directive
(6) 2 years after the entry into force of this Directive
(7) 4 years after the entry into force of this Directive
ANNEX I
EUROPEAN PROTECTION ORDER
referred to in Article 6 of
DIRECTIVE 2010/…/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL OF … ON THE EUROPEAN PROTECTION ORDER
Issuing State: Executing State: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ANNEX II
FORM
referred to in Article 8(1)(d) of
DIRECTIVE 2010/…/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL OF … ON THE EUROPEAN PROTECTION ORDER
REPORT OF A BREACH OF THE PROTECTION MEASURE UNDERLYING AND DESCRIBED IN THE EUROPEAN PROTECTION ORDER
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
IV Notices
NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES
Council
18.3.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 69/19 |
COMMON MILITARY LIST OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
(adopted by the Council on 15 February 2010)
(equipment covered by Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment)
(updating and replacing the Common Military List of the European Union adopted by the Council on 23 February 2009)
(CFSP)
(2010/C 69/03)
Note 1: Terms in "quotations" are defined terms. Refer to ‧Definitions of Terms‧ annexed to this List.
Note 2: In some instances chemicals are listed by name and CAS number. The list applies to chemicals of the same structural formula (including hydrates) regardless of name or CAS number. CAS numbers are shown to assist in identifying a particular chemical or mixture, irrespective of nomenclature. CAS numbers cannot be used as unique identifiers because some forms of the listed chemical have different CAS numbers, and mixtures containing a listed chemical may also have different CAS numbers.
ML1 |
Smooth-bore weapons with a calibre of less than 20 mm, other arms and automatic weapons with a calibre of 12,7 mm (calibre 0,50 inches) or less and accessories, as follows, and specially designed components therefor:
ML1 does not apply to smooth-bore weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes. These weapons must not be specially designed for military use or of the fully automatic firing type. ML1 does not apply to firearms specially designed for dummy ammunition and which are incapable of firing any ammunition specified by ML3. ML1 does not apply to weapons using non-centre fire cased ammunition and which are not of the fully automatic firing type. ML1.d. does not apply to optical weapon sights without electronic image processing, with a magnification of 4 times or less, provided they are not specially designed or modified for military use. |
ML2 |
Smooth-bore weapons with a calibre of 20 mm or more, other weapons or armament with a calibre greater than 12,7 mm (calibre 0,50 inches), projectors and accessories, as follows, and specially designed components therefor:
|
ML3 |
Ammunition and fuse setting devices, as follows, and specially designed components therefor:
|
ML4 |
Bombs, torpedoes, rockets, missiles, other explosive devices and charges and related equipment and accessories, as follows, and specially designed components therefor: For guidance and navigation equipment, see ML11. For Aircraft Missile Protection Systems (AMPS), see ML4.c.
|
ML5 |
Fire control, and related alerting and warning equipment, and related systems, test and alignment and countermeasure equipment, as follows, specially designed for military use, and specially designed components and accessories therefor:
|
ML6 |
Ground vehicles and components, as follows: For guidance and navigation equipment, see ML11.
See also ML13.a ML6.a. includes:
Modification of a ground vehicle for military use specified by ML6.a. entails a structural, electrical or mechanical change involving one or more components that are specially designed for military use. Such components include:
ML6 does not apply to civil automobiles, or trucks designed or modified for transporting money or valuables, having armoured or ballistic protection. |
ML7 |
Chemical or biological toxic agents, "riot control agents", radioactive materials, related equipment, components and materials, as follows:
See also entry 1A004 on the EU Dual-Use List.
ML7.b. and ML7.d. do not apply to the following:
The cultures of cells and biological systems specified by ML7.h. and ML7.i.2. are exclusive and these sub-items do not apply to cells or biological systems for civil purposes, such as agricultural, pharmaceutical, medical, veterinary, environmental, waste management, or in the food industry. |
ML8 |
"Energetic materials", and related substances, as follows: See also 1C011 on the EU Dual-Use List. For charges and devices, see ML4 and 1A008 on the EU Dual-Use List Technical Notes
Not used since 2009 ML8 does not apply to the following substances unless they are compounded or mixed with the "energetic material" specified by ML8.a. or powdered metals specified by ML8.c.:
|
ML9 |
Vessels of war (surface or underwater), special naval equipment, accessories, components and other surface vessels, as follows: For guidance and navigation equipment, see ML11.
|
ML10 |
"Aircraft", "lighter-than-air vehicles", unmanned airborne vehicles, aero-engines and "aircraft" equipment, related equipment and components, specially designed or modified for military use, as follows: For guidance and navigation equipment, see ML11.
ML10.b. does not apply to "aircraft" or variants of those "aircraft" specially designed for military use, and which are all of the following:
ML10.d. does not apply to:
ML10.b. and ML10.d. on specially designed components and related equipment for non-military "aircraft" or aero-engines modified for military use applies only to those military components and to military related equipment required for the modification to military use. |
ML11 |
Electronic equipment, not specified elsewhere on the EU Common Military List, as follows, and specially designed components therefor:
|
ML12 |
High velocity kinetic energy weapon systems and related equipment, as follows, and specially designed components therefor:
For weapon systems using sub-calibre ammunition or employing solely chemical propulsion, and ammunition therefor, see ML1 to ML4. ML12 includes the following when specially designed for kinetic energy weapon systems:
ML12 applies to weapon systems using any of the following methods of propulsion:
|
ML13 |
Armoured or protective equipment, constructions and components, as follows:
ML13.b. includes materials specially designed to form explosive reactive armour or to construct military shelters. ML13.c. does not apply to conventional steel helmets, neither modified or designed to accept, nor equipped with any type of accessory device. ML13.c. and d. do not apply to helmets, body armour or protective garments, when accompanying their user for the user’s own personal protection. The only helmets specially designed for bomb disposal personnel that are specified by ML13. are those specially designed for military use. See also entry 1A005 on the EU Dual-Use List. For "fibrous or filamentary materials" used in the manufacture of body armour and helmets, see entry 1C010 on the EU Dual Use List |
ML14 |
‧Specialised equipment for military training‧ or for simulating military scenarios, simulators specially designed for training in the use of any firearm or weapon specified by ML1 or ML2, and specially designed components and accessories therefor. Technical Note The term ‧specialised equipment for military training‧ includes military types of attack trainers, operational flight trainers, radar target trainers, radar target generators, gunnery training devices, anti-submarine warfare trainers, flight simulators (including human-rated centrifuges for pilot/astronaut training), radar trainers, instrument flight trainers, navigation trainers, missile launch trainers, target equipment, drone "aircraft", armament trainers, pilotless "aircraft" trainers, mobile training units and training equipment for ground military operations. ML14 includes image generating and interactive environment systems for simulators, when specially designed or modified for military use. ML14 does not apply to equipment specially designed for training in the use of hunting or sporting weapons. |
ML15 |
Imaging or countermeasure equipment, as follows, specially designed for military use, and specially designed components and accessories therefor:
ML15.f. includes equipment designed to degrade the operation or effectiveness of military imaging systems or to minimize such degrading effects. In ML15, the term specially designed components includes the following when specially designed for military use:
ML15 does not apply to "first generation image intensifier tubes" or equipment specially designed to incorporate "first generation image intensifier tube". For the classification of weapons sights incorporating "first generation image intensifier tubes" see ML1., ML2. and ML5.a. See also 6A002.a.2. and 6A002.b. on the EU Dual-Use List. |
ML16 |
Forgings, castings and other unfinished products the use of which in a specified product is identifiable by material composition, geometry or function, and which are specially designed for any products specified by ML1 to ML4, ML6, ML9, ML10, ML12 or ML19. |
ML17 |
Miscellaneous equipment, materials and ‧libraries‧, as follows, and specially designed components therefor:
Technical Notes
|
ML18 |
Production equipment and components, as follows:
Technical Note For the purposes of ML18, the term ‧production‧ includes design, examination, manufacture, testing and checking. ML18.a. and ML18.b. include the following equipment:
|
ML19 |
Directed energy weapon systems (DEW), related or countermeasure equipment and test models, as follows, and specially designed components therefor:
Directed energy weapon systems specified by ML19 include systems whose capability is derived from the controlled application of:
ML19 includes the following when specially designed for directed energy weapon systems:
|
ML20 |
Cryogenic and "superconductive" equipment, as follows, and specially designed components and accessories therefor:
|
ML21 |
"Software", as follows:
|
ML22 |
"Technology" as follows:
"Technology""required" for the "development", "production" or "use" of items specified by the EU Common Military List remains under control even when applicable to any item not specified by the EU Common Military List. ML22 does not apply to:
|
DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED IN THIS LIST
The following are definitions of the terms used in this List, in alphabetical order.
Definitions apply throughout the List. The references are purely advisory and have no effect on the universal application of defined terms throughout the List.
Words and terms contained in this List of Definitions only take the defined meaning where this is indicated by their being enclosed in "double quotations marks". Definitions of terms between ‧single quotation marks‧ are given in a Technical note to the relevant item. Elsewhere, words and terms take their commonly accepted (dictionary) meanings.
ML7 |
"Adapted for use in war" Any modification or selection (such as altering purity, shelf life, virulence, dissemination characteristics, or resistance to UV radiation) designed to increase the effectiveness in producing casualties in humans or animals, degrading equipment or damaging crops or the environment. |
ML8 |
"Additives" Substances used in explosive formulations to improve their properties. |
ML8, ML9 and ML10 |
"Aircraft" A fixed wing, swivel wing, rotary wing (helicopter), tilt rotor or tilt-wing airborne vehicle. |
ML11 |
"Automated Command and Control Systems" Electronic systems, through which information essential to the effective operation of the grouping, major formation, tactical formation, unit, ship, subunit or weapons under command is entered, processed and transmitted. This is achieved by the use of computer and other specialised hardware designed to support the functions of a military command and control organisation. The main functions of an automated command and control system are: the efficient automated collection, accumulation, storage and processing of information; the display of the situation and the circumstances affecting the preparation and conduct of combat operations; operational and tactical calculations for the allocation of resources among force groupings or elements of the operational order of battle or battle deployment according to the mission or stage of the operation; the preparation of data for appreciation of the situation and decision-making at any point during operation or battle; computer simulation of operations. |
ML22 |
"Basic scientific research" Experimental or theoretical work undertaken principally to acquire new knowledge of the fundamental principles of phenomena or observable facts, not primarily directed towards a specific practical aim or objective. |
ML7, 22 |
"Biocatalysts" Enzymes for specific chemical or biochemical reactions or other biological compounds which bind to and accelerate the degradation of CW agents. Technical Note "Enzymes" means "biocatalysts" for specific chemical or biochemical reactions. |
ML7, 22 |
"Biopolymers" Biological macromolecules as follows:
Technical Notes
|
ML10 |
"Civil aircraft" Those "aircraft" listed by designation in published airworthiness certification lists by the civil aviation authorities to fly commercial civil internal and external routes or for legitimate civil, private or business use. |
ML21, 22 |
"Development" Is related to all stages prior to serial production, such as: design, design research, design analyses, design concepts, assembly and testing of prototypes, pilot production schemes, design data, process of transforming design data into a product, configuration design, integration design, layouts. |
ML17 |
"End-effectors" Grippers, active tooling units and any other tooling that is attached to the baseplate on the end of a "robot" manipulator arm. Technical Note "Active tooling units" are devices for applying motive power, process energy or sensing to a work piece. |
ML4, 8 |
"Energetic materials" Substances or mixtures that react chemically to release energy required for their intended application. "Explosives", "pyrotechnics" and "propellants" are subclasses of energetic materials. |
ML8, 18 |
"Explosives" Solid, liquid or gaseous substances or mixtures of substances which, in their application as primary, booster, or main charges in warheads, demolition and other applications, are required to detonate. |
ML7 |
"Expression Vectors" Carriers (e.g. plasmid or virus) used to introduce genetic material into host cells. |
ML 17 |
"Fuel cell" An electrochemical device that converts chemical energy directly into Direct Current (DC) electricity by consuming fuel from an external source. |
ML13 |
"Fibrous or filamentary materials" Include:
|
ML15 |
"First generation image intensifier tubes" Electrostatically focused tubes, employing input and output fibre optic or glass face plates, multi-alkali photocathodes (S-20 or S-25), but not microchannel plate amplifiers. |
ML22 |
"In the public domain" This means "technology" or "software" which has been made available without restrictions upon its further dissemination. Note: Copyright restrictions do not remove "technology" or "software" from being "in the public domain". |
ML5, 19 |
"Laser" An assembly of components which produce both spatially and temporally coherent light that is amplified by stimulated emission of radiation. |
ML10 |
"Lighter-than-air vehicles" Balloons and airships that rely on hot air or on lighter-than-air gases such as helium or hydrogen for their lift. |
ML17 |
"Nuclear reactor" Includes the items within or attached directly to the reactor vessel, the equipment which controls the level of power in the core, and the components which normally contain or come into direct contact with or control the primary coolant of the reactor core. |
ML8 |
"Precursors" Speciality chemicals used in the manufacture of explosives. |
ML21, 22 |
"Production" Means all production stages, such as: product engineering, manufacture, integration, assembly (mounting), inspection, testing, quality assurance. |
ML8 |
"Propellants" Substances or mixtures that react chemically to produce large volumes of hot gases at controlled rates to perform mechanical work. |
ML4, 8 |
"Pyrotechnic(s)" Mixtures of solid or liquid fuels and oxidizers which, when ignited, undergo an energetic chemical reaction at a controlled rate intended to produce specific time delays, or quantities of heat, noise, smoke, visible light or infrared radiation. Pyrophorics are a subclass of pyrotechnics, which contain no oxidizers but ignite spontaneously on contact with air. |
ML22 |
"Required" As applied to "technology", refers to only that portion of "technology" which is peculiarly responsible for achieving or exceeding the controlled performance levels, characteristics or functions. Such "required""technology" may be shared by different products. |
ML7 |
"Riot control agents" Substances which, under the expected conditions of use for riot control purposes, produce rapidly in humans sensory irritation or disabling physical effects which disappear within a short time following termination of exposure. (Tear gases are a subset of "riot control agents".) |
ML17 |
"Robot" A manipulation mechanism, which may be of the continuous path or of the point-to-point variety, may use sensors, and has all the following characteristics:
The above definition does not include the following devices:
|
ML21 |
"Software" A collection of one or more "programmes" or "microprogrammes" fixed in any tangible medium of expression. |
ML19 |
"Space-qualified" Products designed, manufactured and tested to meet the special electrical, mechanical or environmental requirements for use in the launch and deployment of satellites or high altitude flight systems operating at altitudes of 100 km or higher. |
ML18, 20 |
"Superconductive" Refers to materials, (i.e. metals, alloys or compounds) which can lose all electrical resistance (i.e. which can attain infinite electrical conductivity and carry very large electrical currents without Joule heating). Technical Note The "superconductive" state of a material is individually characterised by a "critical temperature", a critical magnetic field, which is a function of temperature, and a critical current density which is, however, a function of both magnetic field and temperature. |
ML22 |
"Technology" Specific information necessary for the "development", "production" or "use" of a product. The information takes the form of technical data or technical assistance. Technical Notes
|
ML21, 22 |
"Use" Operation, installation (including on-site installation), maintenance (checking), repair, overhaul and refurbishing. |