26.7.2007   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/1

26.7.2007   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/3

(1)

Article 29 of the Treaty states that the objective of the Union to provide citizens with a high level of safety within an area of freedom, security and justice is to be achieved by preventing and combating crime, organised or otherwise, including corruption and fraud.

(2)

The European Union strategy for the beginning of the new millennium on the prevention and control of organised crime emphasises the need to develop a comprehensive EU policy against corruption.

(3)

In its Resolution of 14 April 2005 concerning a comprehensive EU policy against corruption, which refers to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee of 28 May 2003 on a Comprehensive EU Policy against Corruption, the Council reaffirms the importance of the role and work of the Member States in developing a comprehensive, multi-faceted policy against corruption in both the public and private sectors, in partnership with all relevant players from civil society and business alike.

(4)

The European Council welcomed the development in the Hague Programme (2) (point 2.7) of a strategic concept with regard to cross-border organised crime and corruption at EU level and asked the Council and the Commission to develop this concept further and make it operational.

(5)

The heads and key representatives of EU Member States' national police monitoring and inspection bodies and those of their anti-corruption agencies with a wider remit met in November 2004 in Vienna at the AGIS conference on the Enhancement of Operational Cooperation in Fighting Corruption in the European Union. They emphasised the importance of further enhancing their cooperation, inter alia through annual meetings, and welcomed the idea of a European anti-corruption network based upon existing structures. In the wake of the Vienna conference these European Partners Against Corruption (EPAC) met in Budapest in November 2006 for their sixth annual meeting, where with an overwhelming majority, they confirmed their commitment to supporting the initiative on setting up a more formal anti-corruption network.

(6)

In order to build upon existing structures, the authorities and agencies to form part of the European anti-corruption network could include EPAC member organisations.

(7)

The enhancement of international cooperation is generally (3) recognised as a key issue in the fight against corruption. The fight against all forms of corruption should be improved by cooperating effectively, identifying opportunities, sharing good practices and developing high professional standards. The establishment of a anti-corruption network at EU level is an important contribution to the improvement of such cooperation,

(1)

it shall constitute a forum for the exchange throughout the EU of information on effective measures and experience in the prevention and combating of corruption;

(2)

it shall facilitate the establishment and active maintenance of contacts between its members.

26.7.2007   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/5

26.7.2007   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/7

26.7.2007   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/8

1.

On 13 April 2007, Poland notified the Commission, on the basis of Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty, of Articles 111 and 172 of a draft act entitled ‘Law on Genetically Modified Organisms’, containing national provisions derogating from Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 concerning the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms (1).

2.

The draft act aims at regulating in a comprehensive manner activities related to GMOs. Its objective is to implement Council Directive 90/219/EEC of 23 April 1990 on the contained use of GMOs (2) and Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of GMOs. In addition, it sets requirements for the cultivation of GM crops and their co-existence with conventional and organic farming.

3.

Article 95(5) of EC Treaty stipulates that:

‘Moreover, without prejudice to paragraph 4, if, after the adoption by the Council or by the Commission of a harmonisation measure, a Member State deems it necessary to introduce national provisions based on new scientific evidence relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment on grounds of a problem specific to that Member State arising after the adoption of the harmonisation measure, it shall notify the Commission of the envisaged provisions as well as the grounds for introducing them.’

According to Article 95(6), the Commission shall, within six months of the notification, approve or reject the national provisions involved after having verified whether or not they are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction to trade between Member States and whether or not they constitute an obstacle to the functioning of the internal market.

4.

Article 111(2), points 5 and 6 of the Polish draft act require that an application for a deliberate release is accompanied by:

5.

According to Article 172, paragraph 1, of the Polish draft act, it shall be prohibited to cultivate genetically modified plants subject to the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 172. Paragraph 2 of this article provides that upon request of an interested party, the minister for agriculture may issue a decision concerning the establishment of a zone for growing GMOs after consultation with the minister for environment and the council of the district authority (gmina) in the territory of which the GMOs are intended to be grown.

6.

The notified provisions aim at introducing a general prohibition regarding the cultivation of GMOs with the possibility of obtaining an authorisation on a case-by-case basis. These provisions establish an additional authorisation procedure by the Polish authorities and make the cultivation of GMOs subject to neighbouring farmers' consent.

7.

As such, these provisions constitute derogations from the provisions set out in Directive 2001/18/EC, particularly with regard to Article 22 which stipulates that ‘Member States may not prohibit, restrict or impede the placing on the market of GMOs, as or in products, which comply with the requirements of this Directive’, and Article 19, according to which ‘only if a written consent has been given for the placing on the market of GMO as or in a product may that product be used without further notification throughout the Community in so far as the specific conditions of use and the environments and/or geographical areas stipulated in these conditions are strictly adhered to’.

8.

Poland argues that:

9.

The present notification will proceed taking due account of Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of GMOs and in accordance with Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty. The Commission has six months to examine the notified provisions derogating from Directive 2001/18/EC and may extend the period by a further period of up to six months if this is justified by the complexity of the facts of the case and no danger to human health exists.

10.

Any comment on the present notification shall be sent to the Commission within 30 days from the publication of this notice. Any comment submitted after these 30 days will not be taken into account.

11.

Further details about the Polish notification can be obtained from: