|
ISSN 1725-2423 |
||
|
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 296 |
|
|
||
|
English edition |
Information and Notices |
Volume 47 |
|
Notice No |
Contents |
page |
|
|
I Information |
|
|
|
Commission |
|
|
2004/C 296/1 |
||
|
2004/C 296/2 |
||
|
2004/C 296/3 |
||
|
|
III Notices |
|
|
|
Commission |
|
|
2004/C 296/4 |
||
|
EN |
|
I Information
Commission
|
1.12.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 296/1 |
Euro exchange rates (1)
30 November 2004
(2004/C 296/01)
1 euro=
|
|
Currency |
Exchange rate |
|
USD |
US dollar |
1,3295 |
|
JPY |
Japanese yen |
136,54 |
|
DKK |
Danish krone |
7,4287 |
|
GBP |
Pound sterling |
0,69660 |
|
SEK |
Swedish krona |
8,9238 |
|
CHF |
Swiss franc |
1,5114 |
|
ISK |
Iceland króna |
86,45 |
|
NOK |
Norwegian krone |
8,1050 |
|
BGN |
Bulgarian lev |
1,9559 |
|
CYP |
Cyprus pound |
0,5795 |
|
CZK |
Czech koruna |
30,988 |
|
EEK |
Estonian kroon |
15,6466 |
|
HUF |
Hungarian forint |
245,74 |
|
LTL |
Lithuanian litas |
3,4528 |
|
LVL |
Latvian lats |
0,6872 |
|
MTL |
Maltese lira |
0,4324 |
|
PLN |
Polish zloty |
4,2075 |
|
ROL |
Romanian leu |
38 405 |
|
SIT |
Slovenian tolar |
239,82 |
|
SKK |
Slovak koruna |
39,280 |
|
TRL |
Turkish lira |
1 899 800 |
|
AUD |
Australian dollar |
1,7147 |
|
CAD |
Canadian dollar |
1,5785 |
|
HKD |
Hong Kong dollar |
10,3365 |
|
NZD |
New Zealand dollar |
1,8555 |
|
SGD |
Singapore dollar |
2,1772 |
|
KRW |
South Korean won |
1 393,85 |
|
ZAR |
South African rand |
7,7068 |
Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
|
1.12.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 296/2 |
Types of gas and the corresponding supply pressures according to Article 2(2) of Council Directive 90/396/EEC of 29 June 1990
(2004/C 296/02)
(This publication is based on information received by the Commission services from the Member States)
|
Country |
Gas family |
Wobbe index (gross) in |
Supply pressure in mbar |
|||||||||||||
|
MJ/m3 or kWh/m3 (0 °C) |
MJ/m3 or kWh/m3 (15 °C) |
Minimum |
Nominal |
Maximum |
||||||||||||
|
AUSTRIA |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
47,7-56,5 MJ/m3 |
|
18 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Group P |
|
72,9-76,8 MJ/m3 |
42,5 |
50 |
57,5 |
|||||||||||
|
Group B/P |
|
72,9-87,3 MJ/m3 |
42,5 |
50 |
57,5 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
In leisure accommodation vehicles and boats |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
25 |
30 |
35 (1) |
|||||||||||
|
BELGIUM |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group L (a) |
12,19-13,03 kWh/m3 |
11,56-12,35 kWh/m3 |
18 (2) |
25 (2) |
30 (2) |
|||||||||||
|
(43,90-46,89 MJ/m3) |
(41,61-44,45 MJ/m3) |
|||||||||||||||
|
Group H (a) |
13,65-15,78 kWh/m3 |
12,94-14,96 kWh/m3 |
15 (2) |
20 (2) |
25 (2) |
|||||||||||
|
(49,13-56,82 MJ/m3) |
(46,57-53,86 MJ/m3) |
|||||||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Group P (a) |
22,64 kWh/m3 (3) |
21,46 kWh/m3 (3) |
25 (2) |
37 (2) |
45 (2) |
|||||||||||
|
(81,5 MJ/m3) |
(77,26 MJ/m3) |
|||||||||||||||
|
Group B (a) |
25,64 kWh/m3 (5) |
24,30 kWh/m3 (5) |
20 (2) |
28-30 (2) |
35 (2) |
|||||||||||
|
(92,3 MJ/m3) |
(87,50 kWh/m3) |
|||||||||||||||
|
CYPRUS |
THIRD |
88,2-89,4 MJ/m3 |
|
20 |
28-30 |
35 |
||||||||||
|
CZECH REPUBLIC |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
|
45,7-54,7 MJ/m3 |
17 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Group B |
|
81,8-87,3 MJ/m3 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
42,5 |
50 |
57,5 |
||||||||||||||
|
Group B/P |
|
72,9-87,3 MJ/m3 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
42,5 |
50 |
57,5 |
||||||||||||||
|
Group P |
|
72,9-76,8 MJ/m3 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
25 |
37 |
45 |
||||||||||||||
|
42,5 |
50 |
57,5 |
||||||||||||||
|
DENMARK |
FIRST |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group a (b) |
21,6-23,9 MJ/m3 |
|
6 (6) |
8 (6) |
15 (6) |
|||||||||||
|
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Group H (b) |
51,9-55,8 MJ/m3 |
|
17 (6) |
20 (6) |
25 (6) |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Group B/P (b) |
76,9-92,1 MJ/m3 |
|
25 (6) |
30 (6) |
35 (6) |
|||||||||||
|
ESTONIA |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
52,99 MJ/m3 |
|
17 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
79,6-89,9 MJ/m3 |
|
25 |
30 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
FINLAND |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
52,99 MJ/m3 |
|
17 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
81,89 MJ/m3 |
|
25 |
30 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
FRANCE |
FIRST |
24 MJ/m3 (7) |
|
|
8 |
|
||||||||||
|
25,6 MJ/m3 (8) |
|
|
8 |
|
||||||||||||
|
SECOND |
50 MJ/m3 (9) |
|
|
20 (10) |
|
|||||||||||
|
Group H |
48,2-56,5 MJ/m3 |
|
|
20 (10) |
|
|||||||||||
|
Group L |
42,5-46,8 MJ/m3 |
|
|
25 |
|
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Group B |
89,8 MJ/m3 (11) |
|
20 |
28/30 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
42,5 |
50 (12) |
57,5 |
||||||||||||||
|
60 |
112 (13) |
140 |
||||||||||||||
|
Group B/P |
79,6-89,9 MJ/m3 (15) |
|
25 |
28/30 (14) |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
Group P |
79,6 MJ/m3 (16) |
|
25 |
37 |
45 |
|||||||||||
|
42,5 |
50 (12) |
57,5 |
||||||||||||||
|
100 |
148 (17) |
180 |
||||||||||||||
|
GERMANY |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H (c) |
46,08-56,52 MJ/m3 |
43,70-53,56 MJ/m3 |
18 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
12,80-15,70 kWh/m3 |
12,14-14,88 kWh/m3 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Group L (c) |
37,80-46,80 MJ/m3 |
35,83-44,36 MJ/m3 |
18 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
10,50-13,00 kWh/m3 |
9,95-12,32 kWh/m3 |
|||||||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Group P (d) |
79,00-81,70 MJ/m3 |
74,89-77,40 MJ/m3 |
42,5 |
50 |
57,5 |
|||||||||||
|
21,94-22,69 kWh/m3 |
20,80-21,51 kWh/m3 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Group B/P |
79,00-92,70 MJ/m3 |
74,89-87,87 MJ/m3 |
42,5 |
50 |
57,5 |
|||||||||||
|
21,94-25,75 kWh/m3 |
20,80-24,41 kWh/m3 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
In leisure accommodation vehicles and boats |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
25 |
30 |
35 (18) |
|||||||||||
|
GREECE |
SECOND |
48,75-53,92 MJ/m3 |
|
18 |
|
23 |
||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
86,1-87,8 MJ/m3 |
28 |
30 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
77,0-80,0 MJ/m3 |
|
|
37 |
||||||||||||
|
|
88,0-88,4 MJ/m3 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
HUNGARY |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
|
45,66-54,76 MJ/m3 |
18 |
25 (19) |
33 |
|||||||||||
|
75 |
85 (20) |
100 |
||||||||||||||
|
Group S |
|
36,29-41,58 MJ/m3 |
18 |
25 (19) |
33 |
|||||||||||
|
75 |
85 (20) |
100 |
||||||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Group B |
91,63 MJ/m3 |
|
25 |
29 (21) |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
42,5 |
50 (22) |
57,5 |
||||||||||||||
|
Group B/P |
81,45-91,63 MJ/m3 |
|
25 |
29 (21) |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
42,5 |
50 (22) |
57,5 |
||||||||||||||
|
Group P |
81,45 MJ/m3 |
|
25 |
29 (21) |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
42,5 |
50 (22) |
57,5 |
||||||||||||||
|
IRELAND |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
|
45,7-54,7 MJ/m3 |
17 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
72,9-78,7 MJ/m3 (23) |
25 |
37 |
45 |
|||||||||||
|
81,8-87,9 MJ/m3 (24) |
20 |
28 |
35 |
|||||||||||||
|
ITALY |
FIRST |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group A |
21,76 MJ/m3 |
24,75 MJ/m3 |
6 |
8 |
15 |
|||||||||||
|
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Group H |
53,16 MJ/m3 |
50,72 MJ/m3 |
17 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
Group M (25) (e) |
44,76 MJ/m3 |
42,29 MJ/m3 |
17 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
80,58 MJ/m3 |
87,33 MJ/m3 |
20 |
28-30 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
70,69 MJ/m3 |
76,84 MJ/m3 |
25 |
37 |
45 |
||||||||||||
|
LATVIA |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
|
41,2 – 54,4 MJ/m3 (26) |
17 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
LITHUANIA |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
|
50,33-50,48 MJ/m3 |
17 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
76,6-87,8 MJ/m3 |
|
30 |
|
|||||||||||
|
LUXEMBOURG |
THIRD |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
41,866 MJ/m3 |
|
30 |
|
100 |
|||||||||||
|
MALTA |
THIRD |
|
80,02-86,06 MJ/m3 |
28 |
30 |
35 |
||||||||||
|
NETHERLANDS |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group L |
43,9 MJ/m3 (27) |
|
|
25 |
|
|||||||||||
|
Group H |
53,6 MJ/m3 (28) |
|
|
25 |
|
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
92,3 MJ/m3 (29) |
|
|
30 |
|
|||||||||||
|
81,5 MJ/m3 (30) |
|
|
30 + 50 |
|
||||||||||||
|
POLAND |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group E |
45,1-54,1 MJ/m3 |
42,7-51,2 MJ/m3 |
16 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
Gases combined with second family (31) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Group Lm |
23,1-27,1 MJ/m3 |
21,8-25,6 MJ/m3 |
6 |
8 |
11 |
|||||||||||
|
Group Ln |
27,1-32,6 MJ/m3 |
25,6-30,8 MJ/m3 |
10,5 |
13 |
16 |
|||||||||||
|
Group Ls |
32,6-37,6 MJ/m3 |
30,8-35,6 MJ/m3 |
10,5 |
13 |
16 |
|||||||||||
|
Group Lw |
37,6-45,1 MJ/m3 |
35,6-42,7 MJ/m3 |
17,5 |
20 |
23 |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
81,2-92,5 MJ/m3 |
72,9-87,3 MJ/m3 |
29 |
36 |
44 |
|||||||||||
|
PORTUGAL |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
48,1-58,0 MJ/m3 (32) |
|
|
20 |
|
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Group P |
|
77,1 MJ/m3 (33) |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Group B |
|
86,1 MJ/m3 (33) |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
SLOVAKIA |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
|
45,67-54,76 MJ/m3 |
17 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Group B |
|
80,58-87,33 MJ/m3 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
42,5 |
50 |
57,5 |
||||||||||||||
|
Group B/P |
|
72,90-87,33 MJ/m3 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
42,5 |
50 |
57,5 |
||||||||||||||
|
Group P |
|
72,90-76,84 MJ/m3 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
25 |
37 |
45 |
||||||||||||||
|
42,5 |
50 |
57,5 |
||||||||||||||
|
SLOVENIA |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
|
45,7-54,7 MJ/m3 |
17 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Group P |
|
72,9-76,8 MJ/m3 |
25 |
37 |
45 |
|||||||||||
|
Group B/P |
|
72,9-87,3 MJ/m3 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
SPAIN |
FIRST |
|
22,4-24,8 MJ/m3 |
|
8 |
|
||||||||||
|
SECOND |
|
45,7-54,7 MJ/m3 |
17 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
72,9-87,3 MJ/m3 |
|
28 |
|
|||||||||||
|
37 (37) |
||||||||||||||||
|
50 (38) |
||||||||||||||||
|
SWEDEN |
FIRST |
25,4-28,7 MJ/m3 |
|
6 |
8 |
15 |
||||||||||
|
SECOND |
51,9-55,8 MJ/m3 |
|
17 |
20 |
25 |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
75,1-81,3 MJ/m3 |
|
25 |
30 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Group H |
|
46,5-52,85 MJ/m3 |
18,5 |
|
21 (39) |
|||||||||||
|
THIRD |
|
81,8-87,9 MJ/m3 |
20 |
28 |
35 (40) |
|||||||||||
|
72,9-78,7 MJ/m3 |
25 |
37 |
45 (41) |
|||||||||||||
|
72,9-78,7 MJ/m3 |
42,5 |
50 |
57,5 (42) |
|||||||||||||
|
72,9-87,9 MJ/m3 |
— |
— |
— (43) |
|||||||||||||
|
Group B/P (44) |
|
72,9-87,3 MJ/m3 |
20 |
28 |
35 |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Non-EU members of the EEA
|
Country |
Gas family |
Wobbe index (gross) in |
Supply pressure in mbar |
|||
|
MJ/m3 or kWh/m3 (0 °C) |
MJ/m3 or kWh/m3 (15 °C) |
Minimum |
Nominal |
Maximum |
||
|
NORWAY |
SECOND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group H |
|
48,3-52,8 MJ/m3 |
17 |
20 |
25 |
|
|
THIRD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group B/P |
81,7 MJ/m3 |
|
25 |
30 |
35 |
|
(1) For existing gas appliances in leisure accommodation vehicles and boats 50 mbar are permitted.
(2) Pressure at the inlet of the gas appliance.
(3) Commercial propane conformed to the Royal Decree of 20 December 1999.
(4) Only for certain non-domestic appliances (catering etc).
(5) Commercial butane conformed to the Royal Decree of 20 December 1999.
(6) Inlet pressure for the appliances in mbar.
(7) Butane/air mixture.
(8) Propane/air mixture 1.
(9) Propane/air mixture 2.
(10) Pressure level commonly used in the ‘low pressure’ distribution network. Some other higher pressures may be used, the most usual one is 300 mbar.
(11) Commercial butane, distributed by tanks or cylinders.
(12) Only for certain non-domestic appliances (catering etc.).
(13) This value will disappear in the domestic sector.
(14) Standardised supply pressure of 28/30 mbar for domestic appliances equipping leisure vehicles which can use equally commercial butane or commercial propane or a mixture of the two gases (LPG fuel).
(15) Mixture of commercial butane and commercial propane required for carburetting and used to supply domestic appliances found in motor homes.
(16) Commercial propane, distributed by tanks or cylinders or in gas pipe networks.
(17) This value is only available for gas distributed in tanks or cylinders and will disappear in the domestic sector.
(18) For existing gas appliances in leisure accommodation vehicles and boats 50 mbar are permitted.
(19) For gas delivery for public sector.
(20) Direct gas delivery for big users.
(21) Standardised supply pressure of 28/30 mbar for domestic appliances only.
(22) This value is only available for gas distributed in tanks or cylinders and will disappear in the domestic sector.
(23) Propane.
(24) Butane.
(25) LPG/air mixture.
(26) Convention accordingly conditions for dry gas in Latvia are: temperature 20°C, atmospheric pressure 1,01325 bar.
(27) For gas delivery for public purposes.
(28) Direct gas delivery for ‘big users’ (grootverbruikers).
(29) LPG gas (butane/propane mixture).
(30) Gas group 3P for propane installations.
(31) Gases described as combined with second family are not defined in standard EN 437. However this standard foresees in appendix B ‘National situations’ such peculiar gases combined with I or II family.
(32) Calculated under reference conditions 1013 mbar and 0 °C in relation of the upper calorific value.
(33) Upper calorific value calculated under 15 °C reference temperature.
(34) In case of commercial propane.
(35) In case of commercial butane.
(36) For catering appliances, the pressure of 50 mbar for commercial butane and 67 mbar for commercial propane are used.
(37) Domestic use: 28 mbar butane, 37 mbar propane. Appliances must be designed to use both gases at the prescribed pressures.
(38) Propane for industrial use.
(39) Meter outlet pressure.
(40) Commercial butane.
(41) Commercial propane.
(42) Commercial propane.
(43) Higher pressure, including vapour pressure, e.g. for camping use.
(44) This category only for use in appliances installed in caravans and motor caravans.
|
1.12.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 296/8 |
Notice concerning anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Community of furfuryl alcohol originating in the People's Republic of China: Modification of the name of a company with an individual anti-dumping duty rate
(2004/C 296/03)
Imports of furfuryl alcohol originating in the People's Republic of China are subject to definitive anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1905/2003 (1).
Zhucheng Huaxiang Chemical Co., Ltd, a Chinese company whose exports to the Community of furfuryl alcohol are subject to an individual duty rate of EUR 97/tonne by the aforementioned Regulation, has informed the Commission that on 17 December 2003 it changed its name to ‘Zhucheng Taisheng Chemical Co., Ltd’. The company has argued that the change of name does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual duty rate applied to the company under its previous name of Zhucheng Huaxiang Chemical Co., Ltd.
The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of company name in no way affects the findings of Council Regulation (EC) No 1905/2003.
Hence, the references to ‘Zhucheng Huaxiang Chemical Co., Ltd’ should be read as ‘Zhucheng Taisheng Chemical Co., Ltd’ in Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1905/2003.
The Taric code A441, previously attributed to Zhucheng Huaxiang Chemical Co. Ltd, shall apply to Zhucheng Taisheng Chemical Co., Ltd.
(1) OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p. 1.
III Notices
Commission
|
1.12.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 296/9 |
Calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’
Activity: thematic priority area: information society technologies
Call identifier: FP6-2004-IST-4
Call identifier: FP6-2002-IST-C
(2004/C 296/04)
|
1. |
In accordance with Decision No 1513/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 27 June 2002, concerning the sixth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002 to 2006) (1), the Council adopted on 30 September 2002 the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ (2002 to 2006) (2) (referred to as the specific programme). In accordance with Article 5(1) of the specific programme, the Commission of the European Communities (referred to as the Commission) has adopted on 9 December 2002 a work programme (3) (referred to as the work programme) setting out in greater detail the objectives and scientific and technological priorities of the specific programme, and the timetable for implementation. In accordance with Article 9(1) of the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 16 December 2002, concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in, and for the dissemination of research results for, the implementation of the European Community sixth framework programme (2002 to 2006) (4) (referred to as the rules for participation), proposals for indirect RTD actions should be submitted under the terms of calls for proposals. |
|
2. |
The present calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions (referred to as the calls) comprise the present general part and the specific conditions that are described in the annexes. The annexes indicate in particular, the dates of closure for the submission of proposals for indirect RTD actions, an indicative date for the completion of the evaluations, the indicative budget, the instruments and the areas concerned, the evaluation criteria for the evaluation of proposals for indirect RTD actions, the minimum number of participants, and any applicable restrictions. |
|
3. |
Natural or legal persons fulfilling the conditions stated in the rules for participation and that do not fall under any of the exclusion cases in the rules for participation or in Article 114(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (5) (referred to as the proposers) are invited to submit to the Commission proposals for indirect RTD actions subject to the conditions in the rules for participation and in the call concerned being fulfilled. The conditions of participation of the proposers will be verified within the framework of the negotiation of the indirect RTD action. Before that however, proposers will have signed a declaration stating that they do not fall under any of the cases given by Article 93(1) of the Financial Regulation. They will also have given the Commission the information listed in Article 173(2) of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002, of 23 December 2002, laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (6). The European Community has adopted an equal opportunities policy and, on this basis, women are particularly encouraged to either submit proposals for indirect RTD actions or participate in the submission of proposals for indirect RTD actions. |
|
4. |
The Commission makes available to proposers guides for proposers relating to the calls which contain information on the preparation and the submission of a proposal for an indirect RTD action. The Commission also makes available Guidelines on proposal evaluation and selection procedures (7). These guides and guidelines, as well as the work programme and other information relating to the calls, can be obtained from the Commission via the following address:
|
|
5. |
Proposals for indirect RTD actions are invited to be submitted only as an electronic proposal via the web-based electronic proposal submission system (EPSS (8)). In exceptional cases, however, a coordinator may request permission from the Commission to submit on paper in advance of a call deadline. This should be done by writing to one of the following addresses:
The request must be accompanied by an explanation of why the exception is being sought. Proposers wishing to use paper submission take the responsibility for ensuring that such requests for exemption and the associated procedures are completed in time for them to meet the call deadline. All proposals for indirect RTD actions must contain two parts: the forms (part A) and the content (part B). Proposals for indirect RTD actions may be prepared off-line or on-line and submitted on-line. Part B of proposals for indirect RTD actions can only be submitted in PDF (portable document format, compatible with Adobe Version 3 or higher with embedded fonts). Compressed (zipped) files will be excluded. The EPSS software tool (for off-line or on-line usage) is available via the Cordis website www.cordis.lu. Proposals for indirect RTD actions that are submitted on-line and which are incomplete, illegible or contain viruses will be excluded. Versions of proposals for indirect RTD actions submitted on a removable electronic storage medium (eg, CD-ROM, diskette), by email or by fax will be excluded. Any proposal for indirect RTD actions that has been allowed to be submitted on paper and which is incomplete will be excluded. Further details on the various proposal submission procedures are given in Annex J of the Guidelines on proposal evaluation and selection procedures. |
|
6. |
Proposals for indirect RTD actions have to reach the Commission at the latest on the closure date and at the time specified in the call concerned. Proposals for indirect RTD actions arriving after this date and time will be excluded. Proposals for indirect RTD actions not satisfying the conditions relating to the minimum number of participants indicated in the call concerned will be excluded. This also applies regarding any additional eligibility criteria given in the work programme. |
|
7. |
In the case of successive submissions of the same proposal for an indirect RTD action, the Commission will examine the last version received before the closure date and time specified in the call concerned. |
|
8. |
If foreseen in the relevant call, proposals for indirect RTD actions could be evaluated in the framework of a future evaluation. |
|
9. |
In all correspondence relating to a call (e.g. when requesting information, or submitting a proposal for an indirect RTD action), proposers are invited to cite the relevant call identifier. |
(1) OJ L 232, 29.8.2002, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 294, 29.10.2002, p. 1.
(3) Commission Decision C(2002) 4789, as modified by C(2003) 577, C(2003) 955, C(2003) 1952, C(2003) 3543, C(2003) 3555, C(2003) 4609, C(2003) 5183, C(2004) 433, and C(2004) 2002, all decisions unpublished.
(4) OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p. 23
(5) OJ L 248, of 16.9.2002, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 357, of 31.12.2002, p. 1.
(7) C(2003) 883 of 27 March 2003, as last modified by C(2004) 1855 of 18 May 2004.
(8) The EPSS is a tool to assist proposers to develop and submit their proposals electronically.
ANNEX I
CALL 4 OF THE IST PRIORITY
1. Specific programme: Integrating and Strengthening the European Research Area
2. Thematic priority/domain: Information Society Technologies (IST)
3. Call title: Call 4 of the IST priority
4. Call identifier: FP6-2004-IST-4
5. Date of publication:
6. Closure date: 22 March 2005 at 17.00 (Brussels local time)
7. Total indicative budget: EUR 1 120 million
8. Areas and instruments: Proposals are invited to address the following objectives:
9. Minimum number of participants (5):
|
Instrument |
Minimum number |
|
IPs, NoEs, STREPs and CAs |
Three independent legal entities from three different MS or AS, with at least two MS or ACC |
|
Specific support actions |
One legal entity |
10. Restriction to participation: none.
11. Consortium agreement: participants in RTD actions resulting from this call are required to conclude a consortium agreement.
12. Evaluation procedure: the evaluation shall follow a one-stage procedure. Proposals will not be evaluated anonymously.
13. Evaluation criteria: see the section on evaluation criteria in section 4 of the IST 2005 to 2006 Work Programme (6).
14. Indicative evaluation and selection delays: evaluation results are estimated to be available within two months of the closure date.
(1) IP = Integrated projects; NoE = Network of excellence; STREP = Specific targeted research project; CA = Coordination action; SSA = Specific support action.
(2) New instruments: IPs and NoEs.
(3) Traditional instruments: STREPs, SSAs and CAs.
(4) The amount accounts for 90 % of the budget pre-allocated to the Strategic objectives.
(5) MS = Member States of the EU; AS (including ACC) = Associated States; ACC: Associated Candidate Countries. Any legal entity established in a Member State or Associated State and which is made up of the requested number of participants may be the sole participant in an indirect action.
(6) See IST on http://www.cordis.lu/ist/workprogramme/fp6_workprogramme.htm
ANNEX II
CONTINUOUS SUBMISSION CALL (EXTENSION OF CALL FP6-2002-IST-C)
1. Specific programme: Integrating and Strengthening the European Research Area
2. Thematic priority/domain: Information Society Technologies (IST)
3. Call title: Future and emerging technologies – Open domain (Continuous submission)
4. Call identifier: FP6-2002-IST-C
5. Date of publication:
6. Closure date: 5 January 2005 at 17.00 (Brussels local time) for CA, SSA proposals and for short STREP proposals. Successful short STREP proposals that could not be invited to submit a full proposal for a cut-off date in 2004 will be invited to submit a full STREP proposal by a cut-off date of 5 January 2005 or 10 May 2005.
7. Total indicative budget: the budget of EUR 60 million indicated in Call FP6-2002-IST-C, which is expected to be committed for successful proposals submitted by the cut-off dates up to and including 14 September 2004, is supplemented with an additional EUR 39 million (1) (to cover CA, SSA and STREP full proposals submitted by the cut-off/closure date of 5 January 2005 and STREP full proposals submitted by the cut-off date of 10 May 2005). Indicatively, the additional budget will be evenly spread among the two cut-off dates in 2005.
8. Areas and instruments: The domain is open for actions using the following instruments:
9. Minimum number of participants (3):
|
Objective |
Minimum number |
|
STREPs and CAs |
Three independent legal entities from three different MS or AS, with at least two MS or ACC |
|
Specific support actions |
One legal entity |
10. Restriction to participation: none
11. Consortium agreement: It is not mandatory that participants in RTD actions resulting from this call conclude a consortium agreement although such agreements are strongly recommended.
12. Evaluation procedure:
|
— |
proposals for STREPs have to be submitted in two stages: first a short proposal of maximum five pages is submitted describing the key objectives and motivation for the proposed work. Final closing date for the submission of short STREP proposals is 5 January 2005, |
|
— |
short proposals are evaluated anonymously as they come in with the help of remote evaluators, |
|
— |
if the short proposal is successful, the proposers are invited to submit a full proposal by a specified cut-off date. Proposers of successful short proposals will be given at least two months for preparing full proposals. The evaluation of full proposals is not anonymous and is carried out through a combination of remote evaluation and panels of experts that convene in Brussels, |
|
— |
proposals for CAs and SSAs are submitted in one stage and will not be evaluated anonymously. Final closing date for the submission of CAs and SSAs is 5 January 2005, |
|
— |
cut-off dates for the submission of the full proposals for STREPs (second stage) in 2005: 5 January 2005 and 10 May 2005. |
13. Evaluation criteria: see the criteria for FET open in the section on evaluation criteria in paragraph 4.3 of the IST 2005-06 Work Programme (4) and the weights and thresholds below.
14. Indicative evaluation and selection delays:
|
— |
Evaluation results for short proposals: two months from a proposal's reception, |
|
— |
Evaluation results for full proposals: two months from the cut-off or closure date. |
Weights and thresholds for FET open
Specific targeted research projects
SHORT PROPOSALS
|
Criteria |
Relevance to the objectives of the programme |
Potential Impact |
S & T excellence |
Quality of the consortium |
Quality of the management |
Mobilisation of resources |
Overall |
|
Weight |
30 |
30 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
|
Threshold |
3 |
3 |
3 |
- |
- |
2 |
3.5 |
FULL PROPOSALS
|
Weight |
0 |
30 |
40 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
Threshold |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
- |
2 |
3.5 |
Coordination actions
|
Criteria |
Relevance to the objectives of the programme |
Quality of the coordination |
Potential impact |
Quality of the consortium |
Quality of the management |
Mobilisation of resources |
Overall |
|
Weight |
10 |
20 |
30 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
Threshold |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3.5 |
Specific support actions
|
Criteria |
Support to the objectives of the Programme |
Quality of the support action |
Potential impact |
Quality of the management |
Mobilisation of resources |
Overall |
|
Weight |
10 |
20 |
40 |
20 |
10 |
|
|
Threshold |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3.5 |
(1) The amount for FET open accounts for 100 % of the pre-allocated budget.
(2) STREP = Specific targeted research project; CA = Coordination action; SSA = Specific support action.
(3) MS = Member States of the EU; AS (including ACC) = Associated States; ACC: Associated Candidate Countries. Any legal entity established in a Member State or Associated State and which is made up of the requested number of participants may be the sole participant in an indirect action.
(4) See IST on http://www.cordis.lu/ist/workprogramme/fp6_workprogramme.htm