21.10.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/1

21.10.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/2

1.

On 11 October 2004 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Outokumpu Wasacopper Oy (‘Wasacopper’, Finland), belonging to the Outokumpu Group (Finland), and Aurajoki Oy (‘Aurajoki’, Finland), controlled by CapMan Oyj (Finland), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of Cupru Oy, the name of which will be changed to AuraCoat Oy (‘AuraCoat’, Finland), by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No +32 2 2964301 or 2967244) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3536 — Outokumpu Wasacopper/Aurajoki/Cupru JV to the following address:

21.10.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/3

Name

:

Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali

Address

:

Via XX Settembre, 20 – 00187 ROMA

Tel.

:

(39-06) 481 99 68

fax

:

(39-06) 42 01 31 26

e-mail

:

qualita@politicheagricole.it

2.1

:

Name

:

Comitato Promotore D.O.P. Basilico Genovese

2.2

:

Address

:

Via Gropallo n.10/5 - 16122 Genova - Tel. 010-876272

2.3

:

Composition

:

producers/processors (x ) other ( )

3.

Type of product: group 1.6. Fresh fruit and vegetables.

—

under cover 7 000 plants/m2/year,

—

in the open air 2 000 plants/m2/year.

—

under cover 10 kg/m2/year,

—

in the open air 8 kg/m2/year.

Name

:

Camere di Commercio Industria Artigianato ed Agricoltura di Genova, Savona, Imperia e La Spezia.

Address

:

Via Garibaldi n.4 – 16124 Genova

21.10.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/7

1.

On 11 October 2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Quijote Investments SÁRL (Luxembourg), belonging to the Apax group of companies (‘Apax’) and Vista Desarrollo S.A., S.C.R. (‘Vista Desarrollo’, Spain) belonging to Banco Santander Central Hispano S.A. (‘SCH’, Spain) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the undertaking Corporativa de Servicios Grupo Itevelesa, S.L. (‘Itevelesa’, Spain) by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No +32 2 2964301 or 2967244) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3599 — APAX/VISTA DESARROLLO/ITEVELESA, to the following address:

21.10.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/8

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Unit A 3 – Enforcement priorities and decision scrutiny

Access to file notice

B-1049 Brussels

1.

Access to the Commission file is one of the procedural guarantees intended to apply the principle of equality of arms and to protect the rights of the defence. Access to the file is provided for in Article 27(1) and (2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1), Article 15(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 (the Implementing Regulation) (2), Article 18(1) and (3) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Merger Regulation) (3) and Article 17(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 802/2004 (the Merger Implementing Regulation) (4). In accordance with these provisions, before taking decisions on the basis of Articles 7, 8, 23 and 24(2) of Regulation No 1/2003 and Articles 6(3), 7(3), 8(2) to (6), 14 and 15 of the Merger Regulation, the Commission shall give the persons, undertakings or associations of undertakings, where applicable, an opportunity of making known their views on the objections against them and they shall be entitled to have access to the Commission's file in order to fully respect the rights of defence of the parties in the proceedings. The present notice provides the framework for the exercise of the right set out in these provisions. This notice is without prejudice to the interpretation of such provisions by the Community Courts. The principles set out in this Notice apply also when the Commission enforces Articles 53, 54 and 57 of the EEA Agreement (5).

2.

This specific right outlined above is distinct from the general right to access to documents under Regulation No 1049/2001 (6), which is subject to different criteria and exceptions and pursues a different purpose.

3.

The term ‘access to the file’ is used in this notice exclusively to mean the access granted to the parties to whom the Commission has addressed a statement of objections. The same term, or the term ‘access to documents’, is also used in the abovementioned regulations in respect of complainants or other involved parties. These situations are, however, distinct from that of the undertakings or associations to whom a statement of objections is addressed and therefore do not fall under the definition of access to the file for the purposes of this notice. These related situations are dealt with in a separate section of the notice.

4.

This notice clarifies who has access to the file. It also explains to which information access is granted, when access takes place and what are the procedures for implementing access to the file. In contrast, this notice does not address the possibility of the provision of documents before the Commission states its objections to undertakings under the Merger Regulation (7).

5.

As from its publication, this notice replaces the 1997 Commission notice on access to the file (8). The new rules take account of the legislation applicable as of 1 May 2004, namely the abovementioned Regulation No 1/2003, Merger Regulation, Implementing Regulation and Merger Implementing Regulation, as well as the Commission Decision of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (9). It also takes into account the recent case law of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (10) and the practice developed by the Commission since the adoption of the 1997 notice.

6.

Access to the file in competition cases is intended to enable the effective exercise of the rights of defence against the objections brought forward by the Commission. Both in cases under Articles 81 and 82 EC and in cases under the Merger Regulation, access is granted, upon request, to the undertakings or associations of undertakings to which the Commission addresses its objections (11). All such undertakings or associations will be hereinafter referred to as ‘the parties’.

7.

The ‘Commission file’ in a competition investigation (hereinafter also referred to as ‘the file’) consists of all documents (12), which have been obtained, produced and/or assembled by the Commission Directorate General for Competition, during the investigation that has led the Commission to raise its objections.

8.

In the course of investigation under Articles 20, 21 and 22(2) of Regulation No 1/2003 and Articles 12 and 13 of the Merger Regulation, the Commission may collect a number of documents, some of which may, following a more detailed examination, prove to be unrelated to the subject matter of the case in question. Such documents may be returned to the undertaking or association from which those have been obtained. Upon return, these documents will no longer constitute part of the file.

9.

The parties must be able to acquaint themselves with the information in the Commission's file, so that, on the basis of this information, they can effectively express their views on the preliminary conclusions reached by the Commission in its objections. For this purpose they will be granted access to all documents making up the Commission file, as defined in point 0, with the exception of internal documents, business secrets of other undertakings, or other confidential information (13).

10.

Results of a study commissioned in connection with proceedings are accessible together with the terms of reference and the methodology of the study. Precautions may however be necessary in order to protect intellectual property rights.

11.

Internal documents can be neither incriminating nor exculpatory (14). They do not constitute part of the evidence on which the Commission can rely in its assessment of a case. Thus, the parties will not be granted access to internal documents in the Commission file (15). Given their lack of evidential value, this restriction on access to internal documents does not prejudice the proper exercise of the parties' right of defence (16).

12.

There is no obligation on the Commission departments to draft any minutes of meetings (17) with the parties or other persons or undertakings (18). If the Commission chooses to make notes of such meetings, such documents constitute the Commission's own interpretation of what was said at the meetings, for which reason they are classified as internal documents. Where, however, the person or undertaking in question has agreed the minutes, such minutes will be made accessible after deletion of any business secrets or other confidential information. Such agreed minutes constitute part of the evidence on which the Commission can rely in its assessment of a case (19).

13.

In the case of a study commissioned in connection with proceedings, correspondence between the Commission and its contractor containing an evaluation of the contractor's work or relating to financial aspects of the study is considered as internal documents and will thus not be accessible.

14.

A particular case of internal documents is the Commission's correspondence with other public authorities and the internal documents received from such authorities (whether from EC Member States (‘the Member States’) or non-member countries). Examples of such non-accessible documents include:

15.

In certain exceptional circumstances, access is granted to documents originating from Member States, the EFTA Surveillance Authority or EFTA States, after deletion of any business secrets or other confidential information.

This is the case, first, where the documents originating from Member States contain allegations brought against the parties, which the Commission must examine, or form part of the evidence in the investigative process, in a way similar to documents obtained from private parties. Second, access will also be granted to documents originating from Member States which are relevant to the exercise of competence by the Commission in the merger control area (24). These considerations apply, in particular, in the following situations:

16.

The Commission file may also include documents containing two categories of information, namely business secrets and other confidential information, to which access may be partially or totally restricted (28). Access will be granted, where possible, to non-confidential versions of the original information. Where confidentiality can only be assured by summarising the relevant information, access will be granted to a summary. All other documents are accessible in their original form.

17.

In so far as disclosure of information about an undertaking's business activity could result in a serious harm to the same undertaking, such information constitutes business secrets (29). Examples of information that may qualify as business secrets include: technical and/or financial information relating to an undertaking's know-how, methods of assessing costs, production secrets and processes, supply sources, quantities produced and sold, market shares, customer and distributor lists, marketing plans, cost and price structure and sales strategy.

18.

The category ‘other confidential information’ includes information other than business secrets, which may be considered as confidential, insofar as its disclosure would significantly harm a person or undertaking. Depending on the specific circumstances of each case, this may apply to information provided about undertakings which are able to place very considerable economic or commercial pressure on their competitors or on their trading partners, customers or suppliers. The Court of First Instance and the Court of Justice have acknowledged that it is legitimate to refuse to reveal to such undertakings certain letters received from their customers, since their disclosure might easily expose the authors to the risk of retaliatory measures (30). Therefore the notion of other confidential information may include information that would enable the parties to identify complainants or other third parties where those have a justified wish to remain anonymous.

19.

The category of other confidential information also includes military secrets.

20.

Information will be classified as confidential where the person or undertaking in question has made a claim to this effect and such claim has been accepted by the Commission (31).

21.

Claims for confidentiality must relate to information which is within the scope of the above descriptions of business secrets or other confidential information. The reasons for which information is claimed to be a business secret or other confidential information must be substantiated (32). Confidentiality claims can normally only pertain to information obtained by the Commission from the same person or undertaking and not to information from any other source.

22.

Information relating to an undertaking but which is already known outside the undertaking (in case of a group, outside the group), or outside the association to which it has been communicated by that undertaking, will not normally be considered confidential (33). Information that has lost its commercial importance, for instance due to the passage of time, can no longer be regarded as confidential. As a general rule, the Commission presumes that information pertaining to the parties' turnover, sales, market-share data and similar information which is more than five years old is no longer confidential (34).

23.

In proceedings under Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, the qualification of a piece of information as confidential is not a bar to its disclosure if such information is necessary to prove an alleged infringement (inculpatory document) or if it could exonerate a party. In this case, the need to safeguard the rights of the defence of the parties through the provision of the widest possible access to the Commission file may outweigh the concern to protect confidential information of other parties (35). It is for the Commission to assess whether those circumstances apply to any specific situation. This calls, for each piece of information, for an assessment of all relevant elements, including:

Similar considerations apply to proceedings under the Merger Regulation when the disclosure of information is considered necessary by the Commission for the purpose of the procedure (36).

24.

Where the Commission intends to disclose information, the person or undertaking in question shall be granted the possibility to provide a non-confidential version of the documents where that information is contained, with the same evidential value as the original documents (37).

25.

Prior to the notification of the Commission's statement of objections, the parties have no right of access to the file.

26.

Access to the file will be granted upon request and, normally, on a single occasion, following the notification of the Commission's objections to the parties, in order to ensure the principle of equality of arms and to protect their rights of defence. As a general rule, therefore, no access will be granted to other parties' replies to the Commission's objections.

A party will, however, be granted access to documents received after notification of the objections at later stages of the administrative procedure, prior to the adoption of a formal decision, where such documents may constitute new evidence pertaining to the allegations against that party in the Commission's statement of objections.

27.

In accordance with Article 18(1) and (3) of the Merger Regulation and Article 17(1) of the Merger Implementing Regulation, the notifying parties will be given access to the Commission's file upon request at every stage of the procedure following the notification of the Commission's objections up to the consultation of the Advisory Committee.

28.

The present section relates to situations where the Commission may or has to provide access to certain documents contained in its file to the complainants in antitrust proceedings and other involved parties in merger proceedings. Irrespective of the wording used in the antitrust and merger implementing regulations (38), these two situations are distinct — in terms of scope, timing, and parties' rights — from access to the file, as defined in the preceding section of this notice.

29.

The Court of First Instance has ruled (39) that complainants do not have the same rights and guarantees as the parties under investigation. Therefore complainants cannot claim a right of access to the file as established for parties (see points 0 and 0).

30.

However, a complainant who, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Implementing Regulation, has been informed of the Commission's intention to reject its complaint (40), may request access to the documents on which the Commission has based its provisional assessment (41). The complainant will be provided access to such documents on a single occasion, following the issuance of the letter informing the complainant of the Commission's intention to reject its complaint.

31.

Complainants do not have a right of access to business secrets or other confidential information which the Commission has obtained in the course of its investigation (42).

32.

In accordance with Article 17(2) of the Merger Implementing Regulation, access to the file in merger proceedings shall also be given, upon request, to other involved parties who have been informed of the objections in so far as this is necessary for the purposes of preparing their comments.

33.

Such other involved parties are parties to the proposed concentration other than the notifying parties, such as the seller and the undertaking which is the target of the concentration (43).

34.

Any person who submits information or comments in one of the situations listed hereunder, or subsequently submits further information to the Commission in the course of the same procedures, has an obligation to clearly identify any material which it considers to be confidential, giving reasons, and provide a separate non-confidential version by the date set by the Commission for making its views known (44):

35.

Moreover, the Commission may require undertakings (52), in all cases where they produce or have produced documents, to identify the documents or parts of documents, which they consider to contain business secrets or other confidential information belonging to them, and to identify the undertakings with regard to which such documents are to be considered confidential (53).

36.

For the purposes of quickly dealing with confidentiality claims referred to in point 0, the Commission may set a time-limit within which the undertakings shall: (i) substantiate their claim for confidentiality with regard to each individual document or part of document; (ii) provide the Commission with a non-confidential version of the documents, in which the confidential passages are deleted (54). In antitrust proceedings the undertakings in question shall also provide within the said time-limit a concise description of each piece of deleted information (55).

37.

The non-confidential versions and the descriptions of the deleted information must be established in a manner that enables any party with access to the file to determine whether the information deleted is likely to be relevant for its defence and therefore whether there are sufficient grounds to request the Commission to grant access to the information claimed to be confidential.

38.

In antitrust proceedings, if undertakings fail to comply with the provisions set out in points 0 to 0 above, the Commission may assume that the documents or statements concerned do not contain confidential information (56). The Commission will consequently assume that the undertaking has no objections to the disclosure of the documents or statements concerned in their entirety.

39.

In both antitrust proceedings and in proceedings under the Merger Regulation, should the person or undertaking in question meet the conditions set out in points 0 to 0 above, to the extent they are applicable, the Commission will either:

40.

The Commission may reverse its provisional acceptance of the confidentiality claim in whole or in part.

41.

Where the Directorate General for Competition does not agree with the confidentiality claim from the outset or where it takes the view that the provisional acceptance of the confidentiality claim should be reversed, and thus intends to disclose information, it will grant the person or undertaking in question an opportunity to express its views. In such cases, the Directorate General for Competition will inform the person or undertaking in writing of its intention to disclose information, give its reasons and set a time-limit within which such undertaking may inform it in writing of its views. If, following submission of those views, a disagreement on the confidentiality claim persists, the matter will be dealt with by the Hearing Officer according to the applicable Commission terms of reference of Hearing Officers (57).

42.

Where there is a risk that an undertaking which is able to place very considerable economic or commercial pressure on their competitors or on their trading partners, customers or suppliers will adopt retaliatory measures against those, as a consequence of their collaboration in the investigation carried out by the Commission (58), the Commission will protect the anonymity of the authors by providing access to a non-confidential version or summary of the responses in question (59). Requests for anonymity on account of situations of the like, as well as requests for anonymity according to point 81 of the Commission Notice on the handling of complaints (60) will be dealt with according to points 0 to 0.

43.

The Commission may determine that access to the file shall be granted in one of the following ways, taking due account of the technical capabilities of the parties:

The Commission may choose any combination of these methods.

44.

In order to facilitate access to the file, the parties will receive an enumerative list of documents setting out the content of the Commission file, as defined in point 0.

45.

Access is granted to evidence as contained in the Commission's file, in its original form: the Commission is under no obligation to provide a translation of documents in the file (61).

46.

If a party considers that, after having obtained access to the file, it requires knowledge of specific non-accessible information for its defence, it may submit a reasoned request to that end to the Commission. If the request is not granted by the Directorate General for Competition, the party may submit a reasoned request to the Hearing Officer, in accordance with the applicable terms of reference of Hearing Officers (62).

47.

Access to the file in accordance with this notice is granted on the condition that the information thereby obtained may only be used for the purposes of judicial or administrative proceedings for the application of the Community competition rules at issue in the related administrative proceedings (63). Should the information be used for a different purpose, with the involvement of an outside counsel, the Commission may report the incident to the bar of that counsel, with a view to disciplinary action.

48.

With the exception of points 0 and 0, the rules in this section C apply equally to the grant of access to documents to complainants (in antitrust proceedings) and to other involved parties (in merger proceedings).

21.10.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/19

A

:

Meetings bringing together citizens in the framework of new or existing twinning arrangements between towns and municipalities;

B

:

Conferences in the framework of town-twinning dealing with European themes and training seminars for town-twinning officers.

—

towns and municipalities or their twinning associations/committees;

—

towns and municipalities or their twinning associations/committees,

—

other levels of local and regional government,

—

federations and associations of local authorities.

—

the 25 Member States of the European Union (Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom),

—

furthermore an EEA/EFTA country or a candidate country (Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey) will be eligible if, by the deadline for submission of grant applications, an agreement on participation in the programme has been concluded between the Country in concern and the Commission.

21.10.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/s3