Local and people-centred approaches to the EU's cultural heritage

SUMMARY OF:

Council conclusions on participatory governance of cultural heritage

SUMMARY

WHAT DO THESE CONCLUSIONS DO?

KEY POINTS

The benefits of a participatory approach include:

Action at national level

EU countries are invited to take a number of measures, including:

Action at national and EU level

The Commission and the EU countries are called upon to take action within the limits of their own competence, including:

Action at EU level

The conclusions urge the Commission to:

BACKGROUND

Supporting cultural heritage

KEY TERMS

* Cultural heritage. According to the Unesco definition, this includes the following.

* Democratic participation. Citizens’ involvement in looking after their cultural heritage.

* Sustainability. Ensuring cultural heritage is preserved for future generations. It is a means of maintaining local identity, traditions and practices.

* Social cohesion. Cultural heritage has an important role to play in promoting social cohesion, i.e. a sense of community and people’s willingness to cooperate with one another in the interests of the common good. Examples include regenerating neglected areas of cities, which can create local jobs and increase people’s pride in their neighbourhood.

ACT

Council conclusions on participatory governance of cultural heritage (OJ C 463, 23.12.2014, pp. 1-3)

RELATED ACTS

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe (COM(2014) 477 final, 22.7.2014)

last update 16.11.2015