3.6.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/41


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Miskolci Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 6 March 2019 — UO v Készenléti Rendőrség

(Case C-211/19)

(2019/C 187/45)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Miskolci Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UO

Defendant: Készenléti Rendőrség

Questions referred

1.

Must Article 1(3) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (1) be interpreted as meaning that the scope ratione personae of that directive is determined by Article 2 of Directive 89/391/EEC on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work? (2)

2.

If so, must Article 2(2) of Directive 89/391/EEC on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work be interpreted as meaning that Article 2(1) and (2) of [Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time] is not to be applied to police officers who are members of the professional staff of the Rapid Intervention Police?


(1)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).

(2)  OJ 1989 L 183, p. 1.