16.10.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 347/30 |
Action brought on 21 July 2017 — Shindler and Others v Council
(Case T-458/17)
(2017/C 347/39)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Harry Shindler (Porto d’Ascoli, Italy) and 12 other applicants (represented by: J. Fouchet, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the General Court should:
— |
annul Council Decision (EU, Euratom) XT 21016/17 of 22 May 2017, together with the annex XT 21016/17, ADD 1 REV 2 to that decision, authorising the opening of negotiations with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for an agreement setting out the arrangements for that Member State’s withdrawal from the European Union; |
— |
consequently,
|
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging formal illegality of Council Decision (EU, Euratom) XT 21016/17 of 22 May 2017, together with the annex XT 21016/17, ADD 1 REV 2, to that decision, authorising the opening of negotiations with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for an agreement setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal from the European Union (‘the contested decision’). That plea is divided into two parts:
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging substantive illegality of the contested decision; this plea is divided into three parts:
|