|
17.1.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 24/34 |
Order of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Trasta Komercbanka v ECB
(Case T-247/16 RENV) (1)
(Action for annulment - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Action becoming devoid of purpose - Interest in bringing proceedings ceasing to exist - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 24/45)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Trasta Komercbanka AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)
Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: E. Koupepidou and C. Hernández Saseta, acting as Agents, and by B. Schneider and M. Petite, lawyers)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Pommere, acting as Agent), European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of decision ECB/SSM/2016 — 529900WIP0INFDAWTJ81/1 WOANCA-2016-0005 of the ECB of 3 March 2016, adopted pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) and Article 14(5) of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63).
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to rule on the action. |
|
2. |
Trasta Komercbanka AS and the European Central Bank (ECB) shall bear their own costs. |
|
3. |
The Republic of Latvia and the European Commission shall each bear their own costs. |