5.8.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 254/3 |
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on mergers given at its meeting of 17 January 2012 regarding a draft decision relating to Case M.6166 — Deutsche Börse/NYSE Euronext
Rapporteur: UK
2014/C 254/04
1. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the notified operation constitutes a concentration within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a) of the Merger Regulation. |
2. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the notified transaction has a Union dimension pursuant to Article 1 of the Merger Regulation. |
3. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s definitions of the relevant product and geographic markets as stated in the draft decision. |
4. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment that the notified transaction would not lead to a significant impediment of effective competition in the markets concerned in the areas of: (1) Cash Instruments; (2) Market Data and Index Licensing; (3) Information Technology Products and Services; and (4) Collateral Management. |
5. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment that the notified transaction, as originally proposed by the notifying parties, would lead to a significant impediment of effective competition in the following markets and this irrespective of their geographic scope:
|
6. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s analysis of efficiencies and the conclusion that they are not of a nature to counteract the significant impediment to effective competition resulting from the notified transaction. |
7. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the final commitments offered by the notifying Parties on 14 December 2011 do not address the competition concerns identified by the Commission in a sufficient manner and will therefore not eliminate the significant impediment to effective competition resulting from the notified transaction. |
8. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the notified transaction must therefore be declared incompatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement. One Member State abstains. |