30.6.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 163/37

(1)

On 7 July 2009, by Council Decision 2009/589/EC (1) on the basis of a recommendation from the Commission, the Council decided, in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC), that an excessive deficit existed in Poland.

(2)

On the same date, in accordance with Article 104(7) of the TEC and Article 3(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 (2), the Council, on the basis of a recommendation from the Commission, addressed a recommendation to Poland with a view to bringing the excessive deficit situation to an end by 2012.

(3)

On 21 June 2013, the Council concluded that Poland had taken effective action, but that adverse economic events with major implications on public finances had occurred after the adoption of the original recommendation. Therefore, the Council, on the basis of a recommendation from the Commission, considered that the conditions foreseen in Article 3(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 were fulfilled and adopted a new Recommendation concerning Poland under Article 126(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), with a view to bringing the excessive deficit situation to an end by 2014 (3).

(4)

On 10 December 2013, pursuant to Article 126(8) of the TFEU, the Council decided that Poland had not taken effective action in response to the Council Recommendation of 21 June 2013 to correct its excessive deficit by 2014 (4) and adopted a new recommendation under Article 126(7) of the TFEU, recommending Poland put an end to the excessive deficit situation by 2015 (5). In that recommendation, the Council recommended Poland reach a headline deficit of 4,8 % of GDP in 2013, 3,9 % of GDP in 2014 and of 2,8 % of GDP in 2015 (excluding the impact of the asset transfers from the second pillar pension system). Based on the macroeconomic forecast underlying the Council recommendation, this was consistent with an improvement of the structural balance of 1 % of GDP in 2014 and 1,2 % of GDP for 2015. Poland was also recommended to implement rigorously the measures it had already announced and adopted, while complementing them with additional measures to achieve a sustainable correction of the excessive deficit by 2015. Poland was given a deadline of 15 April 2014 to report on the measures taken to comply with this recommendation.

(5)

On 2 June 2014, the Commission concluded that no further steps in the excessive deficit procedure were needed at that moment.

(6)

In accordance with Article 4 of the Protocol (No 12) on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the TFEU, the Commission provides the data for the implementation of the procedure. As part of the application of that Protocol, Member States are to notify data on government deficits and debt and other associated variables twice a year, namely before 1 April and before 1 October, in accordance with Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2009 (6).

(7)

The Council is to take a decision to abrogate a decision on the existence of an excessive deficit on the basis of notified data. Moreover, a decision on the existence of an excessive deficit should be abrogated only if the Commission's forecasts indicate that the deficit will not exceed the 3 % of GDP threshold over the forecast horizon (7); and the debt ratio fulfils the forward-looking element of the debt benchmark.

(8)

Moreover, in accordance with the Stability and Growth Pact, due consideration should be given to systemic pension reforms introducing a multi-pillar system that includes a mandatory, fully funded pillar.

(9)

Based on data provided by the Commission (Eurostat) in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2009, following the notification by Poland in April 2015, the 2015 Convergence Programme and the Commission's 2015 spring forecast, the following conclusions are justified:

(10)

As from 2015, which is the year following the correction of the excessive deficit, Poland is subject to the preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact and should progress towards its medium-term budgetary objective at an appropriate pace, including respecting the expenditure benchmark. The Commission's 2015 spring forecast projects the structural balance to improve by 0,2 % of GDP both in 2015 and 2016, based on the no-policy-change assumption. On the basis of an overall assessment, Poland is projected to be compliant with the required adjustment towards the medium-term budgetary objective in 2015 based on a net expenditure growth below the benchmark, whereas there is a risk of some deviation from the required adjustment in 2016 as the structural adjustment falls short of the requirement in 2016 so that further measures will be needed in that year.

(11)

In accordance with Article 126(12) of the TFEU, a Council Decision on the existence of an excessive deficit is to be abrogated when the excessive deficit in the Member State concerned has, in the view of the Council, been corrected.

(12)

In the view of the Council, the excessive deficit in Poland has been corrected and Decision 2009/589/EC should therefore be abrogated.

(13)

The Council recalls that the systemic pension reform of 1999 replaced a defined-benefit public pension scheme, with a three-pillar system based on defined contributions. The main objective of the reform was to improve the sustainability of the Polish pension system especially in light of the very challenging demographic outlook Poland is facing. The reversal of the systemic reform at the end of 2013, increased again the role of the first, public pillar, which, contrary to the second pillar, is not fully funded, but a notional defined-contribution system. While producing some budgetary relief in the short term, the reversal of the systemic reform of 1999 does not improve the long-term sustainability of public finances, as the short-term benefits from higher social contributions and lower interest payments will be offset by higher future pension payments from the public pension pillar. Overall, the reversal of the systemic pension reform of 1999 carries some risks for Polish public finances in the long run,