|
9.3.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 67/20 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION
of 26 February 2013
on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
(notified under document C(2013) 981)
(Only the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)
(2013/123/EU)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (1), and in particular Article 7(4) thereof,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (2), and in particular Article 31 thereof,
Having consulted the Committee on the Agricultural Funds,
Whereas:
|
(1) |
Under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, and Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of these verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them. |
|
(2) |
The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the reports issued on the outcome have been examined by the Commission. |
|
(3) |
Under Regulations (EC) No 1258/1999 and (EC) No 1290/2005, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed European Union rules may be financed. |
|
(4) |
In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD. |
|
(5) |
The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission’s written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States. |
|
(6) |
As regards the cases covered by this decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with European Union rules was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject. |
|
(7) |
This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 15 October 2012 and relating to its content, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The expenditure itemised in the Annex hereto that has been incurred by the Member States’ accredited paying agencies and declared under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, under the EAGF or under the EAFRD shall be excluded from European Union financing because it does not comply with European Union rules.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Lithuania, Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Poland, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Done at Brussels, 26 February 2013.
For the Commission
Dacian CIOLOȘ
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 103.
(2) OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1.
ANNEX
|
Member State |
Measure |
Financial Year |
Reason |
Type |
% |
Currency |
Amount |
Deductions |
Financial impact |
|
BUDGET ITEM: |
|||||||||
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2006 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–93 217,10 |
0,00 |
–93 217,10 |
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
152,33 |
0,00 |
152,33 |
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 869 463,15 |
0,00 |
– 869 463,15 |
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
4,89 |
0,00 |
4,89 |
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
252,09 |
0,00 |
252,09 |
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 481 485,19 |
0,00 |
–1 481 485,19 |
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, Claim 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
28,08 |
0,00 |
28,08 |
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
19,78 |
0,00 |
19,78 |
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
49,34 |
0,00 |
49,34 |
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on-the-spot controls, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–70,55 |
0,00 |
–70,55 |
|
TOTAL BE |
EUR |
–2 443 729,48 |
0,00 |
–2 443 729,48 |
|||||
|
CY |
Financial audit - Overshooting |
2011 |
exceeding of ceilings |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–26,69 |
–26,69 |
0,00 |
|
TOTAL CY |
EUR |
–26,69 |
–26,69 |
0,00 |
|||||
|
CZ |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 985 525,73 |
0,00 |
– 985 525,73 |
|
CZ |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 355,61 |
0,00 |
– 355,61 |
|
CZ |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 901 569,16 |
0,00 |
–1 901 569,16 |
|
CZ |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–19,89 |
0,00 |
–19,89 |
|
CZ |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 546,95 |
0,00 |
–1 546,95 |
|
CZ |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC non defined, weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–2 366 879,57 |
0,00 |
–2 366 879,57 |
|
TOTAL CZ |
EUR |
–5 255 896,91 |
0,00 |
–5 255 896,91 |
|||||
|
DK |
Irregularities |
2011 |
deficiencies in the recovery of a debt case |
ONE-OFF |
|
DKK |
– 142 645,00 |
0,00 |
– 142 645,00 |
|
TOTAL DK |
DKK |
– 142 645,00 |
0,00 |
– 142 645,00 |
|||||
|
ES |
Entitlements |
2007 |
forage area non-inclusion in the calculation of the reference area/ amounts |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 969 526,34 |
0,00 |
–1 969 526,34 |
|
ES |
Entitlements |
2007 |
deficiencies in the national reserve allocation for the investments into olive sector |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 435 445,92 |
0,00 |
–1 435 445,92 |
|
ES |
Entitlements |
2007 |
deficiencies in the calculation of payment entitlements for bovine premium |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 718 490,48 |
0,00 |
– 718 490,48 |
|
ES |
Entitlements |
2007 |
wrong application of the exceptional circumstances clause in sugar sector |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 107 390,07 |
0,00 |
– 107 390,07 |
|
ES |
Entitlements |
2008 |
forage area non-inclusion in the calculation of the reference area/ amounts |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–2 140 711,78 |
0,00 |
–2 140 711,78 |
|
ES |
Entitlements |
2008 |
deficiencies in the national reserve allocation for the investments into olive sector |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 441 201,28 |
0,00 |
–1 441 201,28 |
|
ES |
Entitlements |
2008 |
deficiencies in the calculation of payment entitlements for bovine premium |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 721 414,45 |
0,00 |
– 721 414,45 |
|
ES |
Entitlements |
2008 |
wrong application of the exceptional circumstances clause in sugar sector |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 136 846,50 |
0,00 |
– 136 846,50 |
|
ES |
Entitlements |
2009 |
deficiencies in the national reserve allocation for the investments into olive sector |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 453 007,15 |
0,00 |
–1 453 007,15 |
|
ES |
Entitlements |
2009 |
forage area non-inclusion in the calculation of the reference area/ amounts |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–5 060 486,51 |
0,00 |
–5 060 486,51 |
|
ES |
Entitlements |
2009 |
deficiencies in the calculation of payment entitlements for bovine premium |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 687 715,79 |
0,00 |
– 687 715,79 |
|
ES |
Entitlements |
2009 |
wrong application of the exceptional circumstances clause in sugar sector |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 157 667,86 |
0,00 |
– 157 667,86 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2002 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 451 439,06 |
0,00 |
– 451 439,06 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2002 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–8 255 792,17 |
0,00 |
–8 255 792,17 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2003 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 625 835,59 |
0,00 |
– 625 835,59 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2003 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 283 466,31 |
0,00 |
– 283 466,31 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2003 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 637 325,71 |
0,00 |
– 637 325,71 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2003 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–10 428 368,99 |
0,00 |
–10 428 368,99 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2004 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 543 032,76 |
0,00 |
– 543 032,76 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2004 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 612 356,11 |
0,00 |
– 612 356,11 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2004 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–85 673,90 |
0,00 |
–85 673,90 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2004 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 420 186,53 |
0,00 |
– 420 186,53 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2004 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 637 325,72 |
0,00 |
– 637 325,72 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2004 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–10 428 369,25 |
0,00 |
–10 428 369,25 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2005 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 644 593,50 |
0,00 |
– 644 593,50 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2005 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–1 197 102,19 |
0,00 |
–1 197 102,19 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2005 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–29 829,44 |
0,00 |
–29 829,44 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - other |
2005 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–3 070,58 |
0,00 |
–3 070,58 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2005 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–73 612,22 |
0,00 |
–73 612,22 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2005 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
–79 665,71 |
0,00 |
–79 665,71 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2005 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–1 303 546,06 |
0,00 |
–1 303 546,06 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2006 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 114 829,31 |
0,00 |
– 114 829,31 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Live animals |
2006 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–12 087,30 |
0,00 |
–12 087,30 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - other |
2006 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 368 662,52 |
0,00 |
– 368 662,52 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose |
2006 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–1 568 548,49 |
0,00 |
–1 568 548,49 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2006 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–1 792,30 |
0,00 |
–1 792,30 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - other |
2006 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–1 792,30 |
0,00 |
–1 792,30 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - other |
2006 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 108 785,66 |
0,00 |
– 108 785,66 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - other |
2007 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 233 717,84 |
0,00 |
– 233 717,84 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2007 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–9 738,24 |
0,00 |
–9 738,24 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose |
2007 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 883 426,04 |
0,00 |
– 883 426,04 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - other |
2007 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 762,46 |
0,00 |
– 762,46 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2007 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 676,14 |
0,00 |
– 676,14 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Non-Annex I |
2008 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–47 777,24 |
0,00 |
–47 777,24 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - other |
2008 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 191 108,96 |
0,00 |
– 191 108,96 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - Sugar and isoglucose |
2008 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 310 869,70 |
0,00 |
– 310 869,70 |
|
ES |
Export refunds - other |
2008 |
deficient ex ante checks on beef, weaknesses in execution of physical checks, inadequate checks on production and stock of sugar, advance notice of physical checks given to the exporters |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–1 043,65 |
0,00 |
–1 043,65 |
|
ES |
Irregularities |
2007 |
reimbursment due to rectification of the Annex III table for financial year 2006 |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
1 998 905,54 |
0,00 |
1 998 905,54 |
|
ES |
Irregularities |
2011 |
weakness in the recovery procedure of a debt |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 214 008,50 |
0,00 |
– 214 008,50 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2006 |
1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–2 049 444,68 |
– 470,83 |
–2 048 973,85 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–9 678,62 |
0,00 |
–9 678,62 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
41,87 |
0,00 |
41,87 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–4 385 343,30 |
– 387,58 |
–4 384 955,72 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
181,89 |
0,00 |
181,89 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–3 017,65 |
0,00 |
–3 017,65 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
0,84 |
0,00 |
0,84 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–35 502,66 |
–2,94 |
–35 499,72 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
50,65 |
0,00 |
50,65 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–2 196,12 |
0,00 |
–2 196,12 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
30,80 |
0,00 |
30,80 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
1 GAEC missing, weaknesses in effectiveness of controls and in application of reduction, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 229,56 |
0,00 |
–1 229,56 |
|
ES |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
1 GAEC missing, Effectiveness of controls, Application of reduction, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
256,70 |
0,00 |
256,70 |
|
TOTAL ES |
EUR |
–61 327 066,88 |
– 861,35 |
–61 326 205,53 |
|||||
|
FI |
Clearance of accounts - Financial Clearance |
2009 |
errors detected during the certification exercise for financial year 2009 in EAGF population |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–64 880,77 |
0,00 |
–64 880,77 |
|
TOTAL FI |
EUR |
–64 880,77 |
0,00 |
–64 880,77 |
|||||
|
FR |
Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines |
2011 |
Late payments |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 138 405,90 |
– 138 405,90 |
0,00 |
|
FR |
Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines |
2011 |
Late payments |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–1 233 451,34 |
–1 233 451,34 |
0,00 |
|
FR |
Certification |
2008 |
Ineligible expenditure |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 108 312,83 |
0,00 |
– 108 312,83 |
|
FR |
Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats |
2007 |
non-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–1 552 358,26 |
–9 314,14 |
–1 543 044,12 |
|
FR |
Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats |
2008 |
non-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–1 492 340,47 |
0,00 |
–1 492 340,47 |
|
FR |
Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats |
2009 |
non-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–1 429 479,12 |
0,00 |
–1 429 479,12 |
|
FR |
Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats |
2010 |
non-compliant holding register, lack of verification of accuracy of entries to the register, update of the register later than on-the-spot check, non-compliance of the computer database |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 109,82 |
0,00 |
– 109,82 |
|
TOTAL FR |
EUR |
–5 954 457,74 |
–1 381 171,38 |
–4 573 286,36 |
|||||
|
GB |
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2008 |
weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–27 569 252,08 |
–11 938 317,64 |
–15 630 934,44 |
|
GB |
Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops |
2008 |
weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–99 998,30 |
0,00 |
–99 998,30 |
|
GB |
Other Direct Aids |
2008 |
weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–88 938,90 |
0,00 |
–88 938,90 |
|
GB |
Other Direct Aids |
2009 |
weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 107 725,59 |
0,00 |
– 107 725,59 |
|
GB |
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2009 |
weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–41 109 525,75 |
0,00 |
–41 109 525,75 |
|
GB |
Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops |
2009 |
weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–31 594,40 |
0,00 |
–31 594,40 |
|
GB |
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2010 |
weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–41 490 749,02 |
0,00 |
–41 490 749,02 |
|
GB |
Other Direct Aids |
2010 |
weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 174 763,24 |
0,00 |
– 174 763,24 |
|
GB |
Other Direct Aid - Energy Crops |
2010 |
weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, in on-the-spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–63 023,44 |
0,00 |
–63 023,44 |
|
GB |
Decoupled Direct Aids |
2010 |
Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in the on-the-spot checks and payments and sanctions |
EXTRAPOLATED |
5,19 % |
EUR |
–16 513 582,57 |
–1 954 694,52 |
–14 558 888,05 |
|
GB |
Irregularities |
2011 |
Deficiencies in the recovery of a debt case |
ONE-OFF |
|
GBP |
–1 452 109,17 |
0,00 |
–1 452 109,17 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–73 257,36 |
0,00 |
–73 257,36 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–4 064,43 |
0,00 |
–4 064,43 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 643 405,41 |
– 700,40 |
–1 642 705,01 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 642 321,16 |
0,00 |
– 642 321,16 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 521,54 |
0,00 |
– 521,54 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–5 359,10 |
0,00 |
–5 359,10 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 712,31 |
0,00 |
– 712,31 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 536,91 |
0,00 |
– 536,91 |
|
TOTAL GB |
GBP |
–1 452 109,17 |
0,00 |
–1 452 109,17 |
|||||
|
TOTAL GB |
EUR |
– 129 619 331,51 |
–13 893 712,56 |
– 115 725 618,95 |
|||||
|
GR |
Financial audit - Overshooting |
2010 |
Exceeding of ceilings |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–4 048 593,82 |
0,00 |
–4 048 593,82 |
|
GR |
Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines |
2010 |
late payments |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–11 217,98 |
–11 217,98 |
0,00 |
|
GR |
Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines |
2010 |
late payments |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–1 148 947,18 |
– 375 753,63 |
– 773 193,55 |
|
GR |
Food Aid within the Community |
2006 |
Overpaid public storage costs |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–58 833,00 |
0,00 |
–58 833,00 |
|
GR |
Public Storage - Rice |
2006 |
Overpaid public storage costs |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 369 174,82 |
0,00 |
– 369 174,82 |
|
GR |
Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines |
2007 |
control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 016 633,47 |
0,00 |
–1 016 633,47 |
|
GR |
Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines |
2007 |
change of the eligibility criteria after the end of the claim year 2006 |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–1 246 345,92 |
0,00 |
–1 246 345,92 |
|
GR |
Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines |
2007 |
control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 358 518,51 |
0,00 |
– 358 518,51 |
|
GR |
Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines |
2008 |
control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 125 128,34 |
0,00 |
– 125 128,34 |
|
GR |
Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines |
2008 |
control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 567 077,51 |
0,00 |
– 567 077,51 |
|
GR |
Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines |
2008 |
control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 339 319,37 |
0,00 |
– 339 319,37 |
|
GR |
Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines |
2008 |
control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
12,58 |
0,00 |
12,58 |
|
GR |
Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines |
2009 |
control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–23 367,16 |
0,00 |
–23 367,16 |
|
GR |
Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines |
2009 |
control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–10 743,31 |
0,00 |
–10 743,31 |
|
GR |
Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines |
2009 |
control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
1 998,07 |
0,00 |
1 998,07 |
|
GR |
Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - except Ovines and Bovines |
2009 |
control free period, weaknesses in determination of the eligibility criteria, in the risk analysis and in the on-the-spot cpntrols, lack of quality supervision for the delegated controls |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 066,26 |
0,00 |
–1 066,26 |
|
TOTAL GR |
EUR |
–9 322 956,00 |
– 386 971,61 |
–8 935 984,39 |
|||||
|
HU |
Cross Compliance |
2006 |
8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
HUF |
– 281 162 836,10 |
–5 622 679,91 |
– 275 540 156,19 |
|
HU |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–1 456,02 |
–1 403,78 |
–52,24 |
|
HU |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–2 836 628,70 |
–21 435,09 |
–2 815 193,61 |
|
HU |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
23,59 |
0,00 |
23,59 |
|
HU |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
387,67 |
–32,60 |
420,27 |
|
HU |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–5 428 019,24 |
–28 383,73 |
–5 399 635,51 |
|
HU |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 101,51 |
0,00 |
– 101,51 |
|
HU |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 416,76 |
0,00 |
– 416,76 |
|
HU |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–8 066,23 |
0,00 |
–8 066,23 |
|
TOTAL HU |
HUF |
– 281 162 836,10 |
–5 622 679,91 |
– 275 540 156,19 |
|||||
|
TOTAL HU |
EUR |
–8 274 277,20 |
–51 255,20 |
–8 223 022,00 |
|||||
|
IE |
Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines |
2011 |
late payments |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–13 215,75 |
–13 215,75 |
0,00 |
|
IE |
Irregularities |
2007 |
Non-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2006 |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–3 606,20 |
0,00 |
–3 606,20 |
|
IE |
Irregularities |
2008 |
Non-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2007 |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–1 048,99 |
0,00 |
–1 048,99 |
|
IE |
Irregularities |
2009 |
Non-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2008 |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–2 109,23 |
0,00 |
–2 109,23 |
|
IE |
Irregularities |
2010 |
Non-reporting of interest in the Annex III table of financial year 2009 |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 892,44 |
0,00 |
– 892,44 |
|
IE |
Irregularities |
2011 |
Negligence in recovering the debt |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–22 624,22 |
0,00 |
–22 624,22 |
|
TOTAL IE |
EUR |
–43 496,83 |
–13 215,75 |
–30 281,08 |
|||||
|
IT |
Cross Compliance |
2006 |
Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–2 140 320,86 |
– 521,76 |
–2 139 799,10 |
|
IT |
Cross Compliance |
2006 |
Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–17,57 |
0,00 |
–17,57 |
|
IT |
Cross Compliance |
2006 |
Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–3 799 568,80 |
– 877,18 |
–3 798 691,62 |
|
IT |
Cross Compliance |
2006 |
Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2005 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 588,40 |
0,00 |
– 588,40 |
|
IT |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–7 065 635,65 |
–60 023,03 |
–7 005 612,62 |
|
IT |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–5 975,35 |
0,00 |
–5 975,35 |
|
IT |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–8 809 763,62 |
–53 375,69 |
–8 756 387,93 |
|
IT |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–19 257,41 |
0,00 |
–19 257,41 |
|
IT |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–11 214 946,03 |
–43 992,23 |
–11 170 953,80 |
|
IT |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers without animals - claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 698 146,26 |
0,00 |
– 698 146,26 |
|
IT |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–14 331 663,30 |
–48 186,16 |
–14 283 477,14 |
|
IT |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
Several SMRs badly controlled, wrong application of correction, for farmers with animals - claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 216 402,75 |
–74,09 |
– 216 328,66 |
|
IT |
Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines |
2011 |
late payments |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–2 458 104,43 |
–2 458 104,43 |
0,00 |
|
IT |
Milk - Quota |
2011 |
recovery of milk levy |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
163 991,21 |
163 991,21 |
0,00 |
|
IT |
Accreditation Paying Agency |
2007 |
deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF |
FLAT RATE |
16,00 % |
EUR |
–3 248,92 |
0,00 |
–3 248,92 |
|
IT |
Accreditation Paying Agency |
2007 |
deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors) |
FLAT RATE |
16,00 % |
EUR |
–64 771,05 |
0,00 |
–64 771,05 |
|
IT |
Accreditation Paying Agency |
2008 |
deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF |
FLAT RATE |
16,00 % |
EUR |
–2 527,19 |
0,00 |
–2 527,19 |
|
IT |
Accreditation Paying Agency |
2008 |
deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors) |
FLAT RATE |
16,00 % |
EUR |
– 119 653,30 |
0,00 |
– 119 653,30 |
|
IT |
Accreditation Paying Agency |
2009 |
deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF |
FLAT RATE |
16,00 % |
EUR |
– 445 807,98 |
0,00 |
– 445 807,98 |
|
IT |
Accreditation Paying Agency |
2009 |
deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAGF (debtors) |
FLAT RATE |
16,00 % |
EUR |
– 118 662,34 |
0,00 |
– 118 662,34 |
|
IT |
Fruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing |
2005 |
Gravely deficient control system, fraud |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
–17 098 044,58 |
0,00 |
–17 098 044,58 |
|
IT |
Fruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing |
2006 |
Gravely deficient control system, fraud |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
– 817 132,98 |
0,00 |
– 817 132,98 |
|
IT |
Fruit and Vegetables - Citrus Processing |
2007 |
Gravely deficient control system, fraud |
FLAT RATE |
25,00 % |
EUR |
1 201,24 |
0,00 |
1 201,24 |
|
IT |
Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures |
2006 |
no cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 318 652,00 |
0,00 |
– 318 652,00 |
|
IT |
Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures |
2006 |
delayed on-the-spot checks; insufficient checks of the use of fertilisers |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–50 391,00 |
0,00 |
–50 391,00 |
|
IT |
Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures |
2006 |
no cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 625 923,00 |
0,00 |
– 625 923,00 |
|
IT |
Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006)* - Area related measures |
2007 |
no cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
4 073,00 |
0,00 |
4 073,00 |
|
TOTAL IT |
EUR |
–70 255 939,32 |
–2 501 163,36 |
–67 754 775,96 |
|||||
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
26,70 |
0,00 |
26,70 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
Three GAEC missing, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–28 566,80 |
– 545,96 |
–28 020,84 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 154 416,57 |
0,00 |
– 154 416,57 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
GAEC not defined (1st pillar only), claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 404 835,64 |
0,00 |
– 404 835,64 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
0,83 |
0,00 |
0,83 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
1 014,70 |
0,00 |
1 014,70 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
Three GAEC missing, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 216,86 |
–3,40 |
– 213,46 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 200,95 |
0,00 |
– 200,95 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 204 161,54 |
0,00 |
– 204 161,54 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC not defined (1st pillar only), claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 468 159,50 |
0,00 |
– 468 159,50 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–0,01 |
0,00 |
–0,01 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
164,08 |
0,00 |
164,08 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
37,58 |
0,00 |
37,58 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Three GAEC missing, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–13,95 |
0,00 |
–13,95 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–24,21 |
0,00 |
–24,21 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 188,77 |
0,00 |
– 188,77 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
5,41 |
0,00 |
5,41 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
29,86 |
0,00 |
29,86 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
One GAEC missing, One GAEC badly controlled, Poor definition of severity, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
29,88 |
0,00 |
29,88 |
|
TOTAL LT |
EUR |
–1 259 475,76 |
– 549,36 |
–1 258 926,40 |
|||||
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–7 853,65 |
0,00 |
–7 853,65 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–20,61 |
0,00 |
–20,61 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–13 568,05 |
0,00 |
–13 568,05 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–2,90 |
0,00 |
–2,90 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–88,08 |
0,00 |
–88,08 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–16 838,20 |
0,00 |
–16 838,20 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
142,32 |
0,00 |
142,32 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2011 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–26,86 |
0,00 |
–26,86 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2011 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–26,01 |
0,00 |
–26,01 |
|
TOTAL MT |
EUR |
–38 282,04 |
0,00 |
–38 282,04 |
|||||
|
NL |
Clearance of accounts - Financial Clearance |
2010 |
known error related to the use of bumble bees for pollination |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 688 510,00 |
0,00 |
– 688 510,00 |
|
TOTAL NL |
EUR |
– 688 510,00 |
0,00 |
– 688 510,00 |
|||||
|
PL |
Fruit and Vegetables - Tomato Processing |
2007 |
weaknesses in the controls checks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
PLN |
–1 166 100,45 |
–8 151,74 |
–1 157 948,71 |
|
PL |
Fruit and Vegetables - Tomato Processing |
2007 |
late payments |
ONE-OFF |
|
PLN |
– 163 034,87 |
0,00 |
– 163 034,87 |
|
PL |
Fruit and Vegetables - Tomato Processing |
2008 |
weaknesses in the controls checks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 340 453,82 |
0,00 |
– 340 453,82 |
|
TOTAL PL |
PLN |
–1 329 135,32 |
–8 151,74 |
–1 320 983,58 |
|||||
|
TOTAL PL |
EUR |
– 340 453,82 |
0,00 |
– 340 453,82 |
|||||
|
RO |
Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines |
2011 |
late payments |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–82 812,73 |
–82 812,73 |
0,00 |
|
TOTAL RO |
EUR |
–82 812,73 |
–82 812,73 |
0,00 |
|||||
|
SE |
Financial audit - Overshooting |
2011 |
exceeding of ceiling |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–3 013,42 |
–3 013,42 |
0,00 |
|
TOTAL SE |
EUR |
–3 013,42 |
–3 013,42 |
0,00 |
|||||
|
SI |
Other Direct Aid - Ewe and Goats |
2007 |
Failure to achieve the minimum rate of on-the-spot checks for ovine throughout the retention period and higher level of reductions and exclusions established during on-the-spot checks in the random sample than in the risk analysis sample |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–37 036,67 |
0,00 |
–37 036,67 |
|
SI |
Other Direct Aid - Article 69 of Reg.1782/2003 - only Ovines and Bovines |
2008 |
Non application of eligibility sanctions in case of late tagging of calves |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–61 130,59 |
0,00 |
–61 130,59 |
|
SI |
Entitlements |
2008 |
Calculation of set-aside entitlements, parcels of land artificially designed in order to fulfil the minimum size requirements, recovery of unduly allocated entitlements and payments, use of national reserve for agricultural land covered by forest, individual cases |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–25 453,98 |
0,00 |
–25 453,98 |
|
SI |
Entitlements |
2009 |
Calculation of set-aside entitlements, parcels of land artificially designed in order to fulfil the minimum size requirements, recovery of unduly allocated entitlements and payments, use of national reserve for agricultural land covered by forest, individual cases |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–13 990,92 |
0,00 |
–13 990,92 |
|
SI |
Entitlements |
2010 |
Calculation of set-aside entitlements, parcels of land artificially designed in order to fulfil the minimum size requirements, recovery of unduly allocated entitlements and payments, use of national reserve for agricultural land covered by forest, individual cases |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 148 484,50 |
0,00 |
– 148 484,50 |
|
TOTAL SI |
EUR |
– 286 096,66 |
0,00 |
– 286 096,66 |
|||||
|
SK |
Financial audit - Late payments and payment deadlines |
2011 |
late payments |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 346 334,22 |
– 346 334,22 |
0,00 |
|
SK |
Cross Compliance |
2007 |
GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 398 260,86 |
0,00 |
– 398 260,86 |
|
SK |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–23,84 |
0,00 |
–23,84 |
|
SK |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 779 668,89 |
0,00 |
– 779 668,89 |
|
SK |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2006 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–8,91 |
0,00 |
–8,91 |
|
SK |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC not defined, weaknesses in on the spot controls, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 796,00 |
0,00 |
– 796,00 |
|
TOTAL SK |
EUR |
–1 525 092,72 |
– 346 334,22 |
–1 178 758,50 |
|||||
|
TOTAL |
DKK |
– 142 645,00 |
0,00 |
– 142 645,00 |
|||||
|
TOTAL |
GBP |
–1 452 109,17 |
0,00 |
–1 452 109,17 |
|||||
|
TOTAL |
HUF |
– 281 162 836,10 |
–5 622 679,91 |
– 275 540 156,19 |
|||||
|
TOTAL |
PLN |
–1 329 135,32 |
–8 151,74 |
–1 320 983,58 |
|||||
|
TOTAL |
EUR |
– 296 785 796,48 |
–18 661 087,63 |
– 278 124 708,85 |
|||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
BUDGET ITEM: |
|||||||||
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on the spot controls, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–31 470,12 |
0,00 |
–31 470,12 |
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on the spot controls, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 440,26 |
0,00 |
–1 440,26 |
|
BE |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
GAEC not implemented, partial on the spot controls, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 352,15 |
0,00 |
– 352,15 |
|
TOTAL BE |
EUR |
–33 262,53 |
0,00 |
–33 262,53 |
|||||
|
BG |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2009 |
deficiencies in timinig of the on-the-spot checks and sample selection |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–40 146,27 |
0,00 |
–40 146,27 |
|
BG |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2010 |
deficiencies in timinig of the on-the-spot checks and sample selection |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
17 174,46 |
0,00 |
17 174,46 |
|
TOTAL BG |
EUR |
–22 971,81 |
0,00 |
–22 971,81 |
|||||
|
CY |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2010 |
Late administrative checks and inappropriate timing of on-the-spot checks |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–2 062,12 |
0,00 |
–2 062,12 |
|
CY |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2011 |
Late administrative checks and inappropriate timing of on-the-spot checks |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–97 678,93 |
0,00 |
–97 678,93 |
|
TOTAL CY |
EUR |
–99 741,05 |
0,00 |
–99 741,05 |
|||||
|
CZ |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2008 |
Lack of on-the-spot checks on livestock density |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–2 153 061,12 |
–10 764,12 |
–2 142 297,00 |
|
CZ |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2009 |
Lack of on-the-spot checks on livestock density |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–2 321 491,75 |
–11 607,46 |
–2 309 884,29 |
|
CZ |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2010 |
Lack of on-the-spot checks on livestock density |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–2 418,58 |
0,00 |
–2 418,58 |
|
CZ |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
GAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 621 456,24 |
0,00 |
– 621 456,24 |
|
CZ |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
GAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–9,15 |
0,00 |
–9,15 |
|
CZ |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–10 682,73 |
0,00 |
–10 682,73 |
|
CZ |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC non defined, Weaknesses in evaluation of non compliances, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 669 467,88 |
0,00 |
– 669 467,88 |
|
TOTAL CZ |
EUR |
–5 778 587,45 |
–22 371,58 |
–5 756 215,87 |
|||||
|
DE |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2007 |
weaknesses in selection among eligible applications |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 130 781,57 |
0,00 |
– 130 781,57 |
|
DE |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2007 |
Payments including ineligible VAT |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–2 698 127,96 |
0,00 |
–2 698 127,96 |
|
DE |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2008 |
weaknesses in selection among eligible applications |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 105 424,95 |
0,00 |
– 105 424,95 |
|
DE |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2009 |
weaknesses in selection among eligible applications |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
– 804 414,05 |
0,00 |
– 804 414,05 |
|
TOTAL DE |
EUR |
–3 738 748,53 |
0,00 |
–3 738 748,53 |
|||||
|
ES |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2009 |
Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2009 paid in financial year 2009) |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–90 572,51 |
0,00 |
–90 572,51 |
|
ES |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2010 |
Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2009 paid in financial year 2010) |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 126 456,16 |
0,00 |
– 126 456,16 |
|
ES |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2010 |
Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2010 paid in financial year 2010) |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 125 866,86 |
0,00 |
– 125 866,86 |
|
ES |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2011 |
Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2009 paid in financial year 2011) |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
536,22 |
0,00 |
536,22 |
|
ES |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2011 |
Weaknesses on the on-the-spot controls, lack of traceability (claim year 2010 paid in financial year 2011) |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–36 730,38 |
0,00 |
–36 730,38 |
|
TOTAL ES |
EUR |
– 379 089,69 |
0,00 |
– 379 089,69 |
|||||
|
FI |
Clearance of accounts - Financial Clearance |
2009 |
errors detected during the certification exercise for financial year 2009 in EAFRD population |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–1 766,40 |
0,00 |
–1 766,40 |
|
TOTAL FI |
EUR |
–1 766,40 |
0,00 |
–1 766,40 |
|||||
|
FR |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 (2007-2013) |
2007 |
Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–2 678 837,27 |
0,00 |
–2 678 837,27 |
|
FR |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2008 |
Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 015 793,65 |
0,00 |
–1 015 793,65 |
|
FR |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2008 |
Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 386 514,48 |
0,00 |
–1 386 514,48 |
|
FR |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2009 |
Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 125 462,91 |
0,00 |
– 125 462,91 |
|
FR |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2009 |
Non-exhaustive administrative control of the preferential loans invoices and late audits in banks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 246 558,73 |
0,00 |
–1 246 558,73 |
|
FR |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2008 |
deficiencies in the on the spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–21 056 869,75 |
0,00 |
–21 056 869,75 |
|
FR |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2009 |
deficiencies in the on the spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–7 898 813,60 |
0,00 |
–7 898 813,60 |
|
TOTAL FR |
EUR |
–35 408 850,39 |
0,00 |
–35 408 850,39 |
|||||
|
GB |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2008 |
weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, on-the-spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 355 672,24 |
–16 180,58 |
– 339 491,66 |
|
GB |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2009 |
weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, on-the-spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 288 122,53 |
0,00 |
– 288 122,53 |
|
GB |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2010 |
weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, in processing of applications, in administrative cross checks, on-the-spot controls |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 298 761,99 |
– 293 852,81 |
–4 909,18 |
|
GB |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2010 |
Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, on-the-spot checks and payments and sanctions |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 173 720,59 |
0,00 |
–1 173 720,59 |
|
GB |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2008 |
deficiencies in the Agri-environment measures |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–3 235 955,12 |
–17 650,45 |
–3 218 304,67 |
|
GB |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2009 |
deficiencies in the Agri-environment measures |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–1 117 396,52 |
–4 828,16 |
–1 112 568,36 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–5 741,43 |
0,00 |
–5 741,43 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–77 419,70 |
0,00 |
–77 419,70 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–22 884,24 |
0,00 |
–22 884,24 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
32,09 |
0,00 |
32,09 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Minimum requirements on fertilisers and plant protection and one SMR not adequately controlled, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–31,12 |
0,00 |
–31,12 |
|
GB |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–70,69 |
0,00 |
–70,69 |
|
TOTAL GB |
EUR |
–6 575 744,08 |
– 332 512,00 |
–6 243 232,08 |
|||||
|
HU |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–79 998,57 |
0,00 |
–79 998,57 |
|
HU |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
8 GAEC not defined, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
10,00 % |
EUR |
–21 025,02 |
0,00 |
–21 025,02 |
|
TOTAL HU |
EUR |
– 101 023,59 |
0,00 |
– 101 023,59 |
|||||
|
IE |
Clearance of accounts - Financial Clearance |
2010 |
Known Error |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
– 197 620,52 |
0,00 |
– 197 620,52 |
|
IE |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2007 |
weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113) |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–10 122,22 |
0,00 |
–10 122,22 |
|
IE |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2008 |
weaknesses in measurability of objectives in the business plan of the Young Farmers scheme (measure 112) |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 115 125,00 |
0,00 |
– 115 125,00 |
|
IE |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2008 |
weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113) |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–31 262,80 |
0,00 |
–31 262,80 |
|
IE |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2009 |
weaknesses in measurability of objectives in the business plan of the Young Farmers scheme (measure 112) |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 134 055,00 |
0,00 |
– 134 055,00 |
|
IE |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2009 |
weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113) |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–20 795,07 |
0,00 |
–20 795,07 |
|
IE |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2010 |
weaknesses in measurability of objectives in the business plan of the Young Farmers scheme (measure 112) |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–55 436,25 |
0,00 |
–55 436,25 |
|
IE |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2010 |
weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113) |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–19 051,20 |
0,00 |
–19 051,20 |
|
IE |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2011 |
weaknesses in the verification of declarations made by the agricultural advisors on certain eligibility criteria under the Early Retirement Scheme (measure 113) |
ONE-OFF |
|
EUR |
–11 113,21 |
0,00 |
–11 113,21 |
|
TOTAL IE |
EUR |
– 594 581,27 |
0,00 |
– 594 581,27 |
|||||
|
IT |
Accreditation Paying Agency |
2008 |
deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD |
FLAT RATE |
16,00 % |
EUR |
–2 885 304,84 |
0,00 |
–2 885 304,84 |
|
IT |
Accreditation Paying Agency |
2009 |
deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD |
FLAT RATE |
16,00 % |
EUR |
–2 709 857,58 |
0,00 |
–2 709 857,58 |
|
IT |
Accreditation Paying Agency |
2009 |
deficiencies in the accreditation criteria for EAFRD (debtors) |
FLAT RATE |
16,00 % |
EUR |
–4 279,19 |
0,00 |
–4 279,19 |
|
IT |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2008 |
delayed on-the-spot checks; insufficient checks of the use of fertilisers |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–7 886,00 |
0,00 |
–7 886,00 |
|
IT |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2008 |
no cross-checks with the animal database; delayed on-the-spot checks |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 246 930,00 |
0,00 |
– 246 930,00 |
|
TOTAL IT |
EUR |
–5 854 257,61 |
0,00 |
–5 854 257,61 |
|||||
|
LT |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2008 |
Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–14 686,92 |
0,00 |
–14 686,92 |
|
LT |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2009 |
Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 848 148,40 |
0,00 |
– 848 148,40 |
|
LT |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2010 |
Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 766 818,02 |
0,00 |
– 766 818,02 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–98 669,98 |
0,00 |
–98 669,98 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–1 743,38 |
0,00 |
–1 743,38 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 101 975,29 |
0,00 |
– 101 975,29 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
392,93 |
0,00 |
392,93 |
|
LT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
One GAEC missing, one GAEC badly controlled, poor definition of severity, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 382,94 |
0,00 |
– 382,94 |
|
TOTAL LT |
EUR |
–1 832 032,00 |
0,00 |
–1 832 032,00 |
|||||
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–6 858,55 |
0,00 |
–6 858,55 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–8 803,69 |
0,00 |
–8 803,69 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–33,58 |
0,00 |
–33,58 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 232,55 |
0,00 |
– 232,55 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–2 078,01 |
0,00 |
–2 078,01 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2010 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–12 545,31 |
0,00 |
–12 545,31 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2011 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2008 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 239,50 |
0,00 |
– 239,50 |
|
MT |
Cross Compliance |
2011 |
Lenient sanctioning system, claim year 2009 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–53,44 |
0,00 |
–53,44 |
|
TOTAL MT |
EUR |
–30 844,63 |
0,00 |
–30 844,63 |
|||||
|
PL |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2008 |
Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 253 108,80 |
0,00 |
– 253 108,80 |
|
PL |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2008 |
Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–9 868 306,45 |
0,00 |
–9 868 306,45 |
|
PL |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2009 |
Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 627 971,30 |
0,00 |
– 627 971,30 |
|
PL |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2009 |
Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–9 761 030,13 |
0,00 |
–9 761 030,13 |
|
PL |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2010 |
Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
– 498 848,26 |
0,00 |
– 498 848,26 |
|
PL |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 - Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) |
2010 |
Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–7 753 973,66 |
0,00 |
–7 753 973,66 |
|
TOTAL PL |
EUR |
–28 763 238,60 |
0,00 |
–28 763 238,60 |
|||||
|
RO |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2009 |
weaknesses in the controls of a risk of creation of artificial conditions, eligibility of the beneficiary, eligibility of expenses |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–3 579 714,82 |
0,00 |
–3 579 714,82 |
|
RO |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) |
2010 |
weaknesses in the controls of a risk of creation of artificial conditions, eligibility of the beneficiary, eligibility of expenses |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–8 921 103,16 |
0,00 |
–8 921 103,16 |
|
RO |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2009 |
Incomplete checks on parcels and on logbooks |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–2 239 090,38 |
–2 239 090,38 |
0,00 |
|
RO |
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures) |
2010 |
Incomplete checks on parcels and on logbooks |
FLAT RATE |
2,00 % |
EUR |
–2 959 592,24 |
0,00 |
–2 959 592,24 |
|
TOTAL RO |
EUR |
–17 699 500,60 |
–2 239 090,38 |
–15 460 410,22 |
|||||
|
SK |
Cross Compliance |
2008 |
GAEC not defined, on-the-spot checks weaknesses - claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 378 504,46 |
0,00 |
– 378 504,46 |
|
SK |
Cross Compliance |
2009 |
GAEC not defined, on-the-spot checks weaknesses - claim year 2007 |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 787,35 |
0,00 |
– 787,35 |
|
TOTAL SK |
EUR |
– 379 291,81 |
0,00 |
– 379 291,81 |
|||||
|
TOTAL |
EUR |
– 107 293 532,04 |
–2 593 973,96 |
– 104 699 558,08 |
|||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
BUDGET ITEM: |
|||||||||
|
LT |
Rural Development - Transitional Instrument |
2007 |
Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 428 809,33 |
0,00 |
– 428 809,33 |
|
LT |
Rural Development - Transitional Instrument |
2008 |
Weak control system on eligibility of beneficiaries |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
– 974 546,18 |
0,00 |
– 974 546,18 |
|
TOTAL LT |
EUR |
–1 403 355,51 |
0,00 |
–1 403 355,51 |
|||||
|
PL |
Rural Development - Transitional Instrument |
2007 |
Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–4 422 645,43 |
0,00 |
–4 422 645,43 |
|
PL |
Rural Development - Transitional Instrument |
2008 |
Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
–1 271 573,68 |
0,00 |
–1 271 573,68 |
|
PL |
Rural Development - Transitional Instrument |
2009 |
Weakness in management of the early retirement scheme |
FLAT RATE |
5,00 % |
EUR |
5 778,15 |
0,00 |
5 778,15 |
|
TOTAL PL |
EUR |
–5 688 440,96 |
0,00 |
–5 688 440,96 |
|||||
|
TOTAL |
EUR |
–7 091 796,47 |
0,00 |
–7 091 796,47 |
|||||