|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2025/1075 |
24.2.2025 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 5 November 2024 – HM and JD v AXA Bank Belgium SA and Others
(Case C-761/24, AXA Bank Belgium and Others)
(C/2025/1075)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Budapest Környéki Törvényszék
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: HM and JD
Defendants: AXA Bank Belgium SA, OTP Bank Nyrt. and OTP Faktoring Követeléskezelő Zrt.
Questions referred
|
1. |
Do Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) on unfair terms in consumer contracts preclude national case-law or an interpretation of domestic law which, in the event that a consumer contract is found to be totally invalid on account of an unfair term applied therein:
|
|
2. |
Does national case-law or an interpretation of domestic law, according to which the legal consequences of the invalidity of an unfair consumer contract may be inferred only as between the current parties to that contract, that is to say between the new lender entering the contractual relationship as a consequence of a change in the parties to that relationship and the consumer as debtor, contravene the concept of ‘seller or supplier’ as defined in Article 2(c) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contracts? |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1075/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)