Action brought on 31 May 2022 — PS v EEAS

(Case T-327/22)

(2022/C 284/73)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: PS (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the decision of the Defendant dated 23/07/2021 establishing an addendum of the Applicant’s contract and whereby his place of assignment was modified from Washington to Brussels as of 01/09/2021 and, in as far as necessary, annul the decision of the Defendant, dated 22/02/2022, rejecting the Applicant’s complaint filed on 20/10/2021, under Article 90(2) of the EU Staff Regulations;

—	order the reimbursement of all the costs incurred by his lawyers for the present appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

—	First plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of the interest of the service.

—	Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of assignment to an equivalent post.