Action brought on 11 July 2021 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO — Save the Duck (ITINERANT)

(Case T-416/21)

(2021/C 357/42)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Itinerant Show Room Srl (San Giorgio in Bosco, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Save the Duck SpA (Milan, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ITINERANT — Application for registration No 17 946 859

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 May 2021 in Case R 997/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—	annul the contested decision;

—	order EUIPO to grant European Union trade mark No 17 946 853 for Classes 18 and 25;

—	order [EUIPO] to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

—	Incorrect exclusion of the evidence submitted before the Board of Appeal;

—	Misapplication of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

—	Misinterpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.