Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 November 2022 –
Ryanair v Commission (Croatia Airlines; COVID-19)
(Case T‑111/21) ( 1 )
(State aid – Croatian air transport market – Aid granted by Croatia to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Direct grant – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Individual concern – Admissibility – Serious difficulties – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Free provision of services – Assessment of the damage – Obligation to state reasons)
|
1. |
Action for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Concept of ‘regulatory act’ within the meaning of the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Any measure of general application with the exception of legislative acts – Decision of the Commission concerning individual aid – Not included (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paragraph 15) |
|
2. |
Action for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Commission decision finding State aid compatible with the internal market without opening the formal investigation procedure – Action by parties concerned within the meaning of Article 108(2) TFEU – Action designed to safeguard the procedural rights of the parties concerned – Admissibility (Arts 108(2) and 263, fourth para., TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 1(h)) (see paragraphs 17, 19-21, 33, 34) |
|
3. |
Action for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Individual concern – Criteria – Commission decision finding an aid compatible with the internal market – Action by an undertaking not demonstrating that its market position was substantially affected – Inadmissibility (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paragraphs 18, 22-32) |
|
4. |
Action for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Commission decision finding State aid compatible with the internal market without opening the formal investigation procedure – Action by parties concerned within the meaning of Article 108(2) TFEU – Identification of the subject matter of the action – Action designed to safeguard the procedural rights of the parties concerned – Pleas capable of being invoked (Arts 108(2) and 263, fourth para., TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 1(h)) (see paragraphs 36-39) |
|
5. |
State aid – Planned aid – Examination by the Commission – Preliminary review and main review – Compatibility of aid with the internal market – Difficulties of assessment – Commission’s duty to initiate the main review procedure – Serious difficulties – Concept – Objective nature – Burden of proof – Circumstances enabling the existence of such difficulties to be established – Obligation for the Commission to seek, on its own initiative and in the absence of any evidence to that effect, potentially relevant information which was not brought to its attention – No such obligation (Art. 108(2) and (3) TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 4(3) and (4)) (see paragraphs 44-48) |
|
6. |
State aid – Prohibition – Exceptions – Aid compatible with the internal market – Aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences – Restrictive interpretation – Requirement of correspondence between the amount of aid and the amount of damage (Art. 107(2)(b) TFEU) (see paragraphs 57, 58, 66) |
|
7. |
State aid – Planned aid – Examination by the Commission – Preliminary review and main review – Compatibility of aid with the internal market – Difficulties of assessment – Commission’s duty to initiate the main review procedure – Serious difficulties – Concept – Objective nature – Burden of proof – Circumstances enabling the existence of such difficulties to be established – No such circumstances (Arts 107(1) TFEU and 108(2) and (3) TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 4(3) and (4)) (see paragraphs 73, 92, 102) |
|
8. |
State aid – Prohibition – Exceptions – Aid compatible with the internal market – Aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences – Direct grant to an airline to compensate it for the COVID-19 pandemic – Assessment in the light of Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Criteria (Art. 107(2)(b) TFEU) (see paragraphs 95-97, 100) |
|
9. |
State aid – Prohibition – Exceptions – Aid compatible with the internal market – Aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences – Direct grant to an airline to compensate it for the COVID-19 pandemic – Assessment in the light of Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Assessment of compatibility with the principle of non-discrimination – Criteria – Objective of the aid – Need for the aid – Proportionality of the aid (Art. 107(2)(b) TFEU) (see paragraphs 107-127) |
|
10. |
Freedom to provide services – Provisions of the TFEU – Scope of application – Services in the transport sector within the meaning of Article 58(1) TFEU – Air transport services – Specific legal regime (Arts 56, 58(1) and 100(2) TFEU) (see paragraphs 130, 131) |
|
11. |
State aid – Prohibition – Exceptions – Aid compatible with the internal market – Aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences – Direct grant to an airline to compensate it for the COVID-19 pandemic – Aid compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Infringement of the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establishment – No such infringement (Arts 58(1), 100(2) and 107(2)(b) TFEU) (see paragraphs 133, 134) |
|
12. |
State aid – Commission decision not to raise objections to an aid scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Scope – Account taken of the context and all the legal rules governing the matter (Arts 107(2)(b) and 296 TFEU) (see paragraphs 144-150) |
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
|
3. |
Orders the Republic of Croatia to bear its own costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.