—

annul the decision of the FRA Director dated 11 November 2019 to issue the disciplinary sanction of removal from post, effective 15 November 2019;

—

if need be, annul the decision of the FRA Director dated 15 April 2020, received on the same day, rejecting the complaint directed by the applicant against the above decision on 16 December 2019;

—

compensate the material and the non-material prejudices suffered by the applicant;

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

1.

First substantive plea in law, alleging error of law and a manifest error of assessment — Violation of the principle of legal certainty — Violation of article 7 paragraph 1 of the Austrian copyright law — Violation of Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

2.

Second substantive plea in law, alleging violation of the principles of good administration and of due diligence — Violation of the principle of the presumption of innocence — Burden of proof — Non-establishment of the reality of the facts — Duty to remain measured in statements made.

3.

Third substantive plea in law, alleging lack of impartiality, neutrality and objectivity of the Director as appointing authority — Violation of the presumption of innocence — Misuse of power.

4.

Fourth substantive plea in law, alleging manifest errors of appreciation.

1.

First procedural plea in law, alleging that the opening of the administrative inquiry lacked even prima facie evidence and disciplinary proceedings were opened irregularly.

2.

Second procedural plea in law, alleging non-respect of the mandate by the inquirer — Violation by the defendant is also alleged of: Article 4(2) and Article 7(6) of FRA Decision no 2013/01, (1) Articles 4(1)(a), 4(1)(b), 4(1)(c), 4(1)(d) and 5(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, (2) and, before applicability of Regulation 2018/1725, of Articles 4(1)(a), 4(1)(b), 4(1)(c), 4(1)(d) and 5(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) 45/2001 (3) — Violation is furthermore alleged of the effects of a judgment of annulment.

3.

Third procedural plea in law, alleging lack of impartiality, neutrality and objectivity of the inquirer.

4.

Fourth procedural plea in law, alleging violation of the rights of the defence, in particular of the right to be heard — Violation by the defendant of Articles 1 and 2 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations and of Article 12 thereof is further alleged.

5.

Fifth procedural plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of good administration and of the duty of care — Violation by the defendant of the reasonable delay and of Article 22 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations is further alleged.