Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 May 2019 — Mitliv Exim

(Case C‑9/19) ( 1 )

(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying the need for an answer to the question referred — Manifest inadmissibility)

Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Need to provide the Court with sufficient information on the factual and legislative context — Scope — Application not providing sufficient detail on the factual and legal context — Impossibility for the Court to provide a useful answer to the referring court — Manifest inadmissibility

(Art. 267 TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 50; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94)

(see paras 15-18, 23-26, operative part)

Operative part

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunalul Bucureşti (Regional Court, Bucharest, Romania), by decision of 8 June 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.

( 1 ) OJ C 131, 8.4.2019.