4.11.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 372/20 |
Appeal brought on 30 August 2019 by Ja zum Nürburgring eV against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-373/15, Nürburgring eV v European Commission
(Case C- 647/19 P)
(2019/C 372/22)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: Ja zum Nürburgring eV (represented by: D. Frey et M. Rudolph, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
1. |
set aside the judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2019 in Case T-373/15; |
2. |
annul Commission Decision C(2014) 3634 final of 1 October 2014 in so far as it found that
|
3. |
in the alternative, set aside the judgment under appeal and refer the case back to the General Court |
4. |
order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Grounds of appeal and main arguments
The appellant relies on five grounds of appeal.
1. |
The General Court erred in law in finding that there was no effect on the appellant as a competitor:
|
2. |
The General Court erred in law in finding that there was no effect on the appellant as a trade association:
|
3. |
The General Court erred in procedure and law in finding that the appellant had no standing to bring an action as a competitor nor as a trade association in respect of the second decision at issue:
|
4. |
The General Court erred in law in disregarding the Commission’s obligation to initiate the formal investigation procedure regarding the grant of new aid by way of the sale of assets to Capricorn:
|
5. |
The General Court erred in its legal reasoning in respect of the Commission’s failure to state reasons concerning the second decision at issue:
|