21.10.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 357/21 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 19 July 2019 — Fussl Modestraße Mayr GmbH v SevenOne Media GmbH
(Case C-555/19)
(2019/C 357/26)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Landgericht Stuttgart
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Fussl Modestraße Mayr GmbH
Defendant: SevenOne Media GmbH
Questions referred
Are
1. |
|
2. |
Is Question 1 to be assessed differently if the national law allows statutory rules pursuant to which the regional broadcasting of advertising can be permitted by law and, in that case, is permitted with an — additionally required — official permit? |
3. |
Is Question 1 to be assessed differently if no use is actually made of the possibility of permitting regional advertising as described in Question 2 and regional advertising is therefore prohibited in its entirety? |
4. |
Having regard to Article 10 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, is Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, particularly the principle of pluralism of the media, to be interpreted as meaning that it precludes a national provision such as that described in Questions 1, 2 and 3? |
(1) Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (OJ 2010 L 95, p. 1).