23.4.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 142/22 |
Appeal brought on 5 January 2018 by Marine Harvest ASA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 October 2017 in Case T-704/14: Marine Harvest ASA v European Commission
(Case C-10/18 P)
(2018/C 142/30)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Marine Harvest ASA (represented by: R. Subiotto QC)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
— |
Set aside the General Court’s judgment, in whole or in part; |
— |
Annul the Commission’s decision of 23 July 2014 or, in the alternative, annul the fines imposed on the appellant pursuant to the decision or, in the further alternative, substantially reduce the fines imposed on the appellant pursuant to the decision; |
— |
Order the Commission to pay the appellant’s legal and other costs, both these proceedings and of the proceedings before the General Court; |
— |
If necessary, remand the case to the General Court for reconsideration in accordance with the Court’s judgment; |
— |
Take any other measures that this Court considers appropriate. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on two pleas in law.
1. |
By its first plea, the appellant submits that the General Court erred in law in failing to apply Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) (‘EUMR’) in this case.
|
2. |
By its second plea, the appellant submits that the General Court erred in law in imposing two fines for the same conduct.
|
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (OJ 2004, L 24, p. 1).