24.8.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 279/2 |
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — French Republic v European Parliament
(Case C-92/18) (1)
(Action for annulment - Law of the institutions - Protocol on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union - European Parliament - Concept of ‘budgetary session’ held in Strasbourg (France) - Article 314 TFEU - Exercise of budgetary powers during an additional plenary part-session held in Brussels (Belgium))
(2020/C 279/02)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: French Republic (represented initially by: E. de Moustier, A.-L. Desjonquères, J.-L. Carré, F. Alabrune, D. Colas and B. Fodda, and subsequently by E. de Moustier, A.-L. Desjonquères, A. Daly and J.-L. Carré, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by: R. Crowe, U. Rösslein and S. Lucente, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented initially by: D. Holderer, C. Schiltz and T. Uri, and subsequently by C. Schiltz and T. Uri, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders the French Republic to pay, in addition to its own costs, those of the European Parliament; |
3. |
Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to bear its own costs. |